|Publication number||US3818490 A|
|Publication date||Jun 18, 1974|
|Filing date||Aug 4, 1972|
|Priority date||Aug 4, 1972|
|Also published as||DE2339156A1|
|Publication number||US 3818490 A, US 3818490A, US-A-3818490, US3818490 A, US3818490A|
|Original Assignee||Westinghouse Electric Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (103), Classifications (18)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [191 Leahy DUAL FREQUENCY ARRAY  lnventor: Henry C. Leahy, Glen Bumie, Md.  Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corporation,
 Filed: Aug. 4, 1972 [2.1] Appl. No.: 277,932
 Cl 343/727, 343/779, 343/786, 343/846  Int. Cl. H0lq 21/00  Field of Search 343/725-730, 343/854, 786, 846
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,193,383 7/l965 Provcncher 343/729 3,482,248 12/1969 Jones 343/725 3 623,l ll ll/l97l Proveneher et al 343/727 3,706,998 l2/1972 Hatchet et al. 343/778 FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 724,403 3/1973 Great Britain 343/727 June 18, 1974 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Hsiao, Multiple Frequency Phased Array Of Dielectric Loaded Waveguides; 1970 G-AP International Symposium September 1970, Columbus, Ohio Primary Examiner-Eli Lieberman Attorney, Agent, or FirmJ. B. Hinson ABSTRACT 5 Claims, 6 Drawing Figures PATENTED JUN 1 81574 SHEET 1 OF 2 PATENTEU l 8 I974 SHEET 2 (IF 2 Q Q I I' ,43 I D 0 WAVEGUIDE INPUT OAXIAL NSMISSION LINE FIG.6
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIIIII I 5 DUAL FREQUENCY ARRAY BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention In general, the present invention pertains to a new antenna structure. More specifically, it pertains to an antenna array which couples to two distinct frequency ranges while using the same aperture. That is, it pertains to a situation where it would be necessary to have two systems operating on two different frequencies but where there is a shortage of space. In such a situation, it is highly desirable to minimize the antenna aperture that is, the area of the antenna.
The invention described hereinafter is particularly useful in a phased array that is, an antenna which has a largenumber of radiators which are individually controllable to some extent. In a phased array, the excitation of space is controlled by a large number of independent, point variables. Each of the independent point variables is an individual element of the phased array, the individual excitation of each element being adjustable. If desired, a phased array can be used for scanning purposes. That is, it is possible to steer the beam and change its shape by changing the excitation functions of each element. When the excitation functions of each element are changed very fast, scanning occurs very fast.
Because a phase array can operate very quickly, not retarded by mechanical inertia they are very desirable pieces of equipment. However, they are also very expensive. Therefore, it is very desirable to make the most efficient use of the antenna aperture and the electronics equipment required to operate the antenna. For example, it is desirable to have the antenna perform two distinct functions substantially simultaneously.
For example, it might be desirable for an airplane to carry an antenna system both for the purpose of mapping the terrain below it and, simultaneously, keeping track of all other aircraft in the immediate vicinity in order to avoid a mid-air collision. While performing a mapping function, angular resolution is extremely important in order to determine exactly where the antenna is pointing within predetermined tolerances. A narrower beam width is necessarily a requirement of increased angular resolution. Because higher frequencies provide narrower beam widths, the greater the angular resolution required for the particular mapping function, the higher the frequency required.
In providing a search function, one of the main objectives is detection of objects of interest at larger and larger ranges. In order to increase the range of detection, the antenna must be operated at a lower frequency as range increases. When an antenna is operated at lower frequencies, its energy is more easily able to penetrate clouds, water, and water vapor. The difficulty of penetrating such atmospheric disturbances increases as frequency increases. Therefore, a search radar uses frequencies in a relatively lower frequency range in order to increase its range capabilities.
As discussed above, the present invention pertains to a system which permits a single antenna aperture to perform two functions. For example, the antenna to be described hereinafter could provide both the above described mapping function and search function because each requires a different, distinct frequency range of operation. However, the invention to be described could be used for any two functions which can be performed by using two distinct frequency ranges and which are separated by a sufficiently large frequency range.
2. Description of the Prior Art A commonly considered method of designing the transmitter electronics of an active antenna array is the use of a transmitter amplifier cascaded with a varactor multiplier. Because an antenna array utilizes large numbers of radiators, construction of such an array has posed a problem of combining large numbers of low powered sources with minimal loss. An excellent solution to this problem has been to associate a system having individual array elemental radiators with individual transmitters. In a system thus configured, the varactor multipliers constitute the major source of inefficiency in converting raw power into usable radiated energy. Nevertheless, their use is mandatory in most of such systems where the radiated frequencies lie above the capabilities of existing transistors.
As explained above, there are situations in multimode radars where high frequencies are required for some functions but not for others. In such cases, one approach is to use the amplifier output as the directly radiated signal thereby eliminating the necessity of transmission through the varactor multipliers. The varactor multipliers often reduce radiated energy by 50 percent to percent. However, this new approach has v led to problems in other areas of design, one of which, radiation structure, is a subject of this invention.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF INVENTION The antenna to be described hereinafter in detail is made up of a plurality of juxtaposed basic radiator structures. Each of the radiator structures is, in turn, made up of a plurality of first radiator elements and a plurality of second radiator elements. The first and second radiator elements are each capable of coupling only to their respective frequency ranges. When the basic radiator structures are arranged in a predetermined manner, the result is a first repetitive radiator system and a second repetitive radiator system which, together, form an antenna array.
The first radiator system is made up of a plurality of rows of a certain type of radiator elements. Interspersed between the rows of these elements are rows of a second kind of radiator element. For each element in the first system there is a corresponding element in the second system. Each row of the first system has aconductive strip which helps to form the first radiator elements. The second system is made up of a plurality of parallel plate waveguides with either a monopole or a dipole situated between the plates of the waveguides and normal to the plates.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS For a better understanding of the invention, reference may be had to the preferred embodiment, exemplary of the invention, shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a normal view of the basic radiator structure of the antenna array;
FIG. 2 is an end view of the basic radiator structure;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of the parallel plate waveguide section of the basic radiator structure;
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the parallel plate waveguide portion of the basic radiator structure;
FIG. 5 is a normal view of a portion of an antenna array comprising a plurality of basic radiator structures', and
FIG. 6 is an end view of the basic radiator showing the RF. energy coupling lines.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The antenna described herein is composed of a plurality of basic radiator structures. When these basic radiator structures are juxtaposed in such a manner that each basic structure is in physical contact with a least one other basic radiator structure, the totality of these structures form an antenna array. Referring briefly to FIG. 5, an antenna 100 is shown as being composed of a plurality of radiator elements 10 and 12. For analysis purposes, in order to break down the array 100 into a basic radiator structure, an elemental, repetitive component has been chosen. Examples of such a component are indicated in FIG. 5 as dashed blocks 80, 85, and 90. Each of these dashed blocks represent a predetermined portion of the antenna aperture that is, a predetermined portion of the antenna area. Each of the blocks covers an equal area. For purposes of explanation herein, block 90 is the easiest to explain.
Referring to FIG. 1, block 90 is shown as the basic radiator structure. It will be understood, however, that any component of like size could be chosen to explain the structure and operation of the present invention. As explained above, block 80 or block 85 could have been chosen.
Referring to FIG. 1, the basic radiator structure 90 is enclosed by and includes three parallel plates l5, l6, and 17. Plates and 16 are part of and enclose a first radiator element 18 which is operable to couple to a first frequency range a high frequency range such as 9-l0 GI-lz. Plates 16 and 17 are part of, and enclose, a second radiator element 19 which is operable to couple to a second frequency range a low frequency range such as 1.8-2.0 GHz.
A fundamental problem which is solved by the present invention is isolation of the two radiation systems. Isolation is quite essential if two plane scan is to be accomplished with maintenance of element drive point impedance and/or more than trivial bandwidth is to be realized. Isolation is accomplished by the present invention which uses crossed linear polarizations and cut off phenomena.
The first radiator element 18, hereinafter referred to as the high frequency radiator, includes a conductive strip 20 composed of metals, copper, brass, aluminum or silver, for example. An aperture 22 is made in the conductive strip 20 in order to couple to the high frequency energy. Because most antennas are reciprocal that is, they can be used either to transmit or receive energy, the function of the present invention is not to be construed as being limited to either of these functioris. Accordingly, the term couple will be used throughout the present application to connote both transmitting and receiving functions.
The aperture 22 in the conductive strip 20 can be referred to as a small born or as an open ended waveguide. While it is recognized that some people skilled in the antenna arts might make definite distinctions between what they call a waveguide and a horn, it is difficult to determine exactly when a radiator becomes so small that the terminology used to describe it can be changed from horn to waveguide. Therefore, even though the two terms can be used interchangeably in the present application, no significance is intended to be attached to one term over the other.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the aperture 22 of the high frequency radiator 18 has a circular crosssection that is, it can be said to be X and Y symmetric. It excites, in space, a far field TEM wave with a horizontal E field. Because of the technique of crosspolarization, the horizontal E field coupled to the high frequency radiator 18 cannot couple to the low frequency radiator 19 as will be described in more detail below.
Although FIG. 1 shows a circular aperture 22, the shape of the aperture need not be circular. For example, the shape could be square or rectangular. In the case of the circular aperture 22, shown in FIG. 1, the diameter of the aperture must be greater than one-half the wavelength of the highest frequency in the high fre quency range. If it is desired to make the basic radiator structure as small as possible, the actual physical diameter of the aperture 22 can be made to be less than one-half of the wavelength but electrically, the effective width must be greater than one-half of the wavelength. Such an effective width is essential to obtain propagation of the high frequency energy through the high frequency radiator 18 that is, through the aperture 22 and the waveguide connected to itv In order to increase the effective cross-section or width of the ap' erture 22, the aperture must be filled with a suitable. low loss dielectric material. An example of such material is polystyrene (e,. 2.6) or Teflon (e, 2.07). When such a dielectric material is used, the effective diameter of the aperture 22 is determined by the relationship D,,,,= D,,,., RT.
If a shape other than circular is used for the aperture 22, one effective dimension can be arbitrary but the other effective dimension must be determined by other considerations. One consideration is the cross polarization effect to prevent coupling of the low frequency energy into the high frequency radiator. Accordingly, the dimension of the aperture which is perpendicular to the direction of the E field of the low frequency radiator (that is, parallel to the direction of the E field of the high frequency radiator) must be less than %.\,f e where A, is the wavelength of the lowest frequency of the high frequency range. In one embodiment, the E field of the low frequency radiator will be vertical and the E field of the high frequency radiator will be horizontal the E field of the high frequency. As explained previously, propagation cannot occur unless the effective electrical width is greater than one-half of the wave-length of the frequency being propagated. Because wavelength increases as frequency decreases, the dimension of the aperture perpendicular to the E field, must be greater Vzlt/ VT, for the greatest usable wavelength. In the present invention, the largest wavelength in the high frequency range will therefore occur at the lowest frequency in that range.
In addition to the consideration of cross polarization, the high frequency range must be chosen so that it cannot couple into the low frequency radiator. That is, the high frequency being propagated must be well beyond the cut off of the lower frequency parallel plate waveguide. Stated another way, the lowest frequency in the high frequency range must be substantially greater than the highest frequency of the low frequency range.
Referring briefly to FIG. 2, it can be seen that the aperture 22 extends for an arbitrary distance in depth. It need only be extended far enough so that the energy can be coupled from the high frequency generator (not shown) by any convenient means such for example a mixer or a transmitter.
Referring again to FIG. 1, the second radiator element 19, hereinafter referred to as the low frequency radiator, is shown juxtaposed to and touching the high frequency radiator 18. It can be said to be touching the high frequency radiator 18 because of the common plate 16 which is common to both the high frequency radiator and the low frequency radiator. In describing the low frequency radiator 19, reference will be made to both FIG. 1 and FIG. 2.
The low frequency radiator 19 includes two parallel plates 16 and 17 which make up a parallel plate waveguide. The spacing between the plates is determined by the high frequency range. That is, the cut off frequency of the parallel plate waveguide is determined by the high frequency range. The cut off frequency is then set by proper spacing between the plates.
The spacing between the plates 16 and 17 of the parallel plate waveguide is made small compared to the wavelengths of both frequency ranges. Specifically, the spacing between the plates 16 and 17 is made less than one-half of the wavelength of the highest frequency of the high frequency range. Consequently, the parallel plate waveguide will be able to propagate TE waves with the E field normal to the plates at all frequencies. TE modes with the E field parallel to the planes of the plates (or any other modes) can propagate only at frequencies above the cut-off frequency of the appropriate mode. The lowest cut-off frequency is defined by the relationship c/ \[I where c is the free space velocity of light, L is the spacing between the plates and e, is the free space normalized dielectric constant of the material between the plates. L and e are chosen to yield a cut-off frequency above the highest frequency of the high frequency operating band. Therefore, there will not be any frequencies which can couple to the high frequency radiator which will also be under the cut-off frequency of the low frequency radiator. To summarize, to prevent cross coupling between high and low frequency radiators, the field coupled to the low frequency radiator has an E field which is normal to the plates of the parallel plate waveguide. On the other hand, the E field of the high frequency radiator 18 is parallel to the plates and 16 and, consequently, parallel to the plates of the parallel plate waveguide 16 and 17. Partially as a result of this cross polarization and because of the above described cut-off features of each radiator segment, the energy of the high frequency radiator cannot be coupled into the low frequency radiator and vice versa.
The low frequency radiator 19 also includes a monopole 24 which is disposed between the plates 16 and 17 essentially in the same plane as the conductive strip 20 of the high frequency radiator 18. The specific structure and location of the monopole 24 will be described in greater detail below.
Referring to FIG. 2, it can be seen that the parallel plates 16 and 17 are short circuited by a conductive strip 26. The short circuit 26 is located at a distance which is measured from the center of the monopole 24.
- waveguide appears as an open circuit or of small reactance at the plane of the conductive strip 20 for TE waves with the E field normal to the plates. As a result, during transmission, all of the transmitted energy will radiate out from the front of the waveguide instead of only half of the energy. That is, the monopole will radiate into half-space. All other x polarized waves impinging on this structure impinge on a waveguide beyond cut-off and the surface appears as an inductive surface with evanescent fields existing in the space between the plates.
FIG. 3 is a cut-away, perspective view of the parallel plate waveguide previously discussed in FIGS. 1 and 2. FIG. 3 shows the monopole placed across the open end of the waveguide and normal to the waveguide plates 16 and 17. The waveguide is open circuited for the fields the monopole can excite and the free space on the other side of the monopole has a real impedance into which energy is radiated. The radiation resistance of the monopole is the impedance of free space multiplied by the ratio of the unit cell dimensions. The unit cell can be defined by the unit vectors describing the monopole location.
The precise location fore and aft of the monopole is not important. However, it is desirable to locate it as close as possible to the edges 16a and 17a of the plates 16 and 17 that is, so that it is essentially in the same plane as the conductive strip 20 which was described in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2. It is desirable to place the monopole in such a position because the driving point impedance of the parallel plate waveguide becomes increasingly frequency sensitive as the monopole is moved away from the edges 16a and 17a of the parallel plates.
The monopole 24, in an operative embodiment, is constructed of the inner cable of a coaxial cable. However, it could just as well be constructed of any wire conductor. It is not necessary to physically connect the monopole 24 to the plate 17. However, it is preferable to have the monopole 24 physically and electrically connected to said plate. The connection can be made by a simple soldering operation. If the monopole is not physically connected to the plate 17, a high capacitance electrical connection between the lower end of the monopole and the plate 17 is required. The diameter of the monopole 24 is significant only insofar as its physical strength is concerned. That is, it should not be so thin that it is unable to remain in its preset position without falling over or that it breaks easily.
In order to connect low frequency energy to the low frequency radiator 19, the low frequency generator (not shown) is connected to two parts of the low frequency radiator by means of two wires 26 and 28, which may form the inner and outer conductors of a coaxial cable.
In order to connect the wires 26 and 28 to the appropriate places of the low frequency radiator 19, a small hole is cut into the plate 16. In order to more easily illustrate the structure, FIG. 3 shows only a cut-away view of the upper plate. However, it will be understood that FIG. 3 only shows half of the hole 30 as illustrated by solid line 31. In fact, the hole is complete as illustrated by dotted line 32. The dimension of the hole does not matter as long as it is significantly smaller than the aperture 22 associated with the high frequency radiator 18 described in FIG. 1. Furthermore, it does not matter if the monopole 24 is thin enough so that it can extend up into the hole 30. Or, if desired, the length of the monopole 24 can stop just short of the underside of the plate 16. A wire 28 is attached to the upper end of the monopole 24 and is extended through the hole 30 for connection to one terminal of the low frequency generator. The other wire, 26, is connected to the other terminal of the low frequency generator and is connected to the edge 31 of the hole 30.
FIG. 4 shows an alternative embodiment to the use of a monopole a dipole. The dipole location is to the monopole location which was described in FIG. 3. That is, it is located as close as possible to the edges 16a and 17a of the plates 16 and 17. In an operative embodiment, the dipole consists of a solid conductor 34 and a hollow metal sleeve 36 which extends downwardly from the plate 16 toward the plate 17. The sleeve 36 has a circular cross section and has an aperture in its center. The sleeve 36 forms the upper half or arm of the dipole and the solid conductor 34 forms the other of the dipole. Although sleeve 36 is shown in FIG. 4 in a cross sectional view, it will be understood that it forms a complete cylinder. Wire 28 is connected to the top of the solid conductor 34 and the other end of conductor 28 is connected to one terminal of the low frequency generator (not shown). The other terminal of the low frequency generator is connected to the wire 26 which, in turn, is connected to the inside face of the sleeve 36.
In order to construct the antenna array 100 shown in FIG. 5, a plurality of the above-described basic radiator structures are juxtaposed to one another. It will be noted, however, as discussed previously, that the basic radiator structure could have been considered to be block 80 or block 85 of FIG. 5. If either of those blocks were used, the basic radiator structure would have had portions of more than one low frequency radiator such as shown by block 80 or it would have had portions of more than one high frequency radiator as shown by block 85. Irrespective of which type of basic radiator structure is used in the analysis, the antenna array 100 shown in FIG. is composed of a plurality of them.
FIG. 5 shows only a portion 100 of the entire antenna array aperture. The array includes two repetitive systems. A portion of the first repetitive system is shown as row 40 which includes and is enclosed by plates 43 and 45 each of which extend, as shown in FIG. 5, in a horizontal direction to their respective ends of the antenna array. The first repetitive radiator system is adapted to operate in the first or high frequency range. Its structure consists of a plurality of high frequency radiators each of which is similar to the high frequency radiator 18 of FIG. 1. That is, it includes a conductive strip 44 and a plurality of apertures 46 located in the conductive strip. The dimensions of the apertures 46 are chosen in the same manner as explained with respect to aperture 22 of the high frequency radiator 18 in FIG. 1. Each such radiator is connected to a different high frequency generator.
The antenna array 100 also has a second repetitive radiator system which is adapted to operate in the second or low frequency range. One portion of the second repetitive radiator system is indicated as row 42 which includes and is enclosed by the plates 45 and 47. These plates also extend in a horizontal direction to their respective ends of the antenna array. These plates, 45 and 47, form a parallel plate waveguide the dimensions of which are determined by the same considerations which were explained above with respect to low frequency radiator 19 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. At predetermined locations throughout the parallel plate waveguide are located a plutality of monopoles or dipoles for the same reasons and of the same dimensions and installed into the parallel plate waveguide in the same manner as was explained in FIGS. 1, 2, and 3. Each such radiator may be connected to a different low frequency generator. For every aperture 46 there is a corresponding monopole or dipole 48. That is, the two are present in their respective repetitive systems on a one to one basis.
As explained above, the row 40 is part of a first repetitive radiator system and the row 42 is part of a second repetitive radiator system. Each row is substantially re peated in alternate rows. That is, the structure of row 40 occurs both above and below row 42. The row occurring after row 42 has been designated as 400. Likewise, a row substantially identical to row 42 occurs both above and below row 40a. The row below row 400 has been designated row 42a. Similarly, row 40b is substantially the same as row 40 and occurs after row 42a; and row 42b is substantially the same as row 42 and occurs after row 40b.
In order to insure that the array operates properly, a number of constraints are necessary. Although it is not necessary that the monopoles 48 be located exactly as shown in FIG. 5 with respect to the apertures 46, once a particular location has been chosen for each, relative to one another, that relative position must be maintained throughout the array. For example, if the longitudinal axis of the monopole 48 is exactly aligned with the vertical diameter of the aperture 46 in one particular one to one relationship, the same relative position must be maintained between all of the monopoles 48 and apertures 46.
In the following discussion of the antenna array, it is easier if we define the high frequency radiator elements to be the apertures 46 and the low frequency radiating elements to be the monopoles 48. However, it will be understood that whenever the term high frequency radiator is used that it is also describing all of the structure and factors considered with respect to FIGS. 1, 2, and 3. In addition, whenever the term low frequency radiator" is used it will incorporate by reference all of the information discussed above with respect to FIGS. 1, 2, and 3.
The space between each of the high frequency radiators 46 must be on the order of one-half of the wavelength of the highest frequency of the high frequency range. That is, the spacing between the apertures 46 cannot be greater than said distance. The spacing between the monopoles 48 is the same as the spacing between the high frequency apertures 46. This is done partially in order to more easily obtain the basic radiator structures described above. It is also done to prevent coupling of energy from the high frequency radiators into the low frequency radiators and vice versa. Moreover, at the frequency at which it is operating, that is, at a low frequency, the spacing of the low frequency radiators cannot be greater than one-eighth of a wavelength. This latter constraint, then, partly determines the low frequency range. The maximum frequency of the low frequency range cannot be greater than one-quarter of the minimum frequency of the high frequency range because the drive point impedance of the low frequency radiators becomes highly reactive for wider spacings. The spacing between the low frequency radiators has been chosen to be not greater than one-eighth of a wavelength of the lowest frequency of the low frequency range because at low frequencies, the Q (the ratio of reactance to resistance) gets better that is, the Q gets lower. When designed in such a manner, the low frequency repetitive system is equivalent to a current sheet. The current can be controlled as a function of position in the sheet.
The only coupling possibilities are monopole (dipole) and/or waveguide to near field vertically polarized waves. Since these waves do not exist in the high frequency far field, the total contribution to such waves of each elemental high frequency radiators near field must be zero.
Typical frequency ranges for the high frequency radiator is 9 to 10 Gl-lz, and 1.8 to 2 Gl-lz for the low frequency radiators.
1. An antenna adapted to operate in first and second frequency ranges comprising:
a. a plurality of radiating horns for radiating energy within said first frequency range;
b. a plurality of dipole radiating elements transversely mounted in a plurality of sections of open waveguide, each of said dipoles being designed to radiate energy in said second frequency range;
. means for mounting said horns and said sections of open waveguide to form a unitary antenna aperture comprising rows of radiating elements, the type of radiating element comprising the rows alternating between horns and dipoles in a direction substantially ninety degrees with respect to said waveguides, with said first and second frequency ranges, the dimension of said horns, the dimension of said dipole elements and the dimension of said open waveguide being selected to reduce the coupling between said horns and dipoles.
2. An antenna adapted to operate in first and second frequency ranges, said antenna comprising a plurality of array elements assembled to form a unitary aperture structure with each element being substantially identical and including a first horn radiating element comprising an opening in a conductive strip for radiating energy within a first selected frequency band and a dipole element for radiating energy within a second selected frequency band, said dipole element being mounted substantially parallel to said strip and transverse across and near the open side of a section of open waveguide, the dimensions of said openings in said conductive strip, said dipole and said open waveguide being selected such that coupling between said horns and dipole is minimized, said elements being assembled such that said dipoles and horns form rows with the type of radiating element alternating between rows.
3. An antenna array in accordance with claim 1 in which the spacing between adjacent radiating horns is less than one half of the wavelength of the highest frequency within said first frequency range.
4. An antenna in accordance with claim 1 in which the mechanical spacing of said dipoles is the same as the spacing of said radiating horns.
5. An antenna adapted to operate in first and second frequency ranges, said antenna comprising a plurality of array elements assembled to form a unitary aperture structure with each element of said array being substantially identical and including, a first radiating element comprising an opening in a conductive strip to form a horn for radiating energy within a first selected frequency band and a second dipole radiating element mounted transversely across and near the open edge of a section of open waveguide for radiating energy within a second selected frequency band, the dimension of said opening in said conductive strip, said second radiating element and said waveguide being selected such that coupling between said first and second radiating elements is minimized said elements being assembled to form said aperture such that said first and second radiating elements form rows with the type of radiating element alternating between adjacent rows.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3193383 *||Nov 14, 1962||Jul 6, 1965||Union Carbide Corp||Iron base alloy|
|US3482248 *||Jul 31, 1967||Dec 2, 1969||Us Army||Multifrequency common aperture manifold antenna|
|US3623111 *||Oct 6, 1969||Nov 23, 1971||Us Navy||Multiaperture radiating array antenna|
|US3706998 *||Feb 3, 1971||Dec 19, 1972||Raytheon Co||Multiple interleaved phased antenna array providing simultaneous operation at two frequencies and two polarizations|
|GB724403A *||Title not available|
|1||*||Hsiao, Multiple Frequency Phased Array Of Dielectric Loaded Waveguides; 1970 G AP International Symposium September 1970, Columbus, Ohio|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4775866 *||May 16, 1986||Oct 4, 1988||Nippondenso Co., Ltd.||Two-frequency slotted planar antenna|
|US4870426 *||Aug 22, 1988||Sep 26, 1989||The Boeing Company||Dual band antenna element|
|US6809692||Oct 17, 2002||Oct 26, 2004||Advanced Automotive Antennas, S.L.||Advanced multilevel antenna for motor vehicles|
|US6864851||Sep 26, 2002||Mar 8, 2005||Raytheon Company||Low profile wideband antenna array|
|US6870507||Aug 1, 2003||Mar 22, 2005||Fractus S.A.||Miniature broadband ring-like microstrip patch antenna|
|US6937191||Apr 23, 2002||Aug 30, 2005||Fractus, S.A.||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US6937206||Oct 15, 2003||Aug 30, 2005||Fractus, S.A.||Dual-band dual-polarized antenna array|
|US7015868||Oct 12, 2004||Mar 21, 2006||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel Antennae|
|US7123208||Apr 8, 2005||Oct 17, 2006||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US7148850||Apr 20, 2005||Dec 12, 2006||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US7164386||Jun 16, 2005||Jan 16, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US7202818||Apr 13, 2004||Apr 10, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Multifrequency microstrip patch antenna with parasitic coupled elements|
|US7202822||Jul 12, 2005||Apr 10, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US7215287||Apr 13, 2004||May 8, 2007||Fractus S.A.||Multiband antenna|
|US7310065||Jan 12, 2005||Dec 18, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Undersampled microstrip array using multilevel and space-filling shaped elements|
|US7312762||Apr 13, 2004||Dec 25, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Loaded antenna|
|US7394432||Oct 17, 2006||Jul 1, 2008||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antenna|
|US7397431||Jul 12, 2005||Jul 8, 2008||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US7439923||Feb 6, 2007||Oct 21, 2008||Fractus, S.A.||Multiband antenna|
|US7466281||Apr 3, 2007||Dec 16, 2008||Wavebender, Inc.||Integrated waveguide antenna and array|
|US7505007||Oct 17, 2006||Mar 17, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Multi-level antennae|
|US7511675||Apr 24, 2003||Mar 31, 2009||Advanced Automotive Antennas, S.L.||Antenna system for a motor vehicle|
|US7528782||Jul 20, 2007||May 5, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US7541997||Jul 3, 2007||Jun 2, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Loaded antenna|
|US7554490||Mar 15, 2007||Jun 30, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US7554505||Oct 31, 2007||Jun 30, 2009||Wavebender, Inc.||Integrated waveguide antenna array|
|US7656358||Oct 31, 2007||Feb 2, 2010||Wavebender, Inc.||Antenna operable at two frequency bands simultaneously|
|US7656359||Oct 31, 2007||Feb 2, 2010||Wavebender, Inc.||Apparatus and method for antenna RF feed|
|US7847749||Oct 31, 2007||Dec 7, 2010||Wavebender, Inc.||Integrated waveguide cavity antenna and reflector RF feed|
|US7868843||Aug 31, 2005||Jan 11, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Slim multi-band antenna array for cellular base stations|
|US7884779||Nov 16, 2007||Feb 8, 2011||Wavebender, Inc.||Multiple-input switch design|
|US7920097||Aug 22, 2008||Apr 5, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Multiband antenna|
|US7932870||Jun 2, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US7961153||Nov 13, 2008||Jun 14, 2011||Wavebender, Inc.||Integrated waveguide antenna and array|
|US8009111||Mar 10, 2009||Aug 30, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US8154462||Feb 28, 2011||Apr 10, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US8154463||Mar 9, 2011||Apr 10, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US8207893||Jul 6, 2009||Jun 26, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US8212726||Dec 31, 2008||Jul 3, 2012||Fractus, Sa||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US8228245||Oct 22, 2010||Jul 24, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Multiband antenna|
|US8228256||Mar 10, 2011||Jul 24, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US8330659||Mar 2, 2012||Dec 11, 2012||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US8471772||Feb 3, 2011||Jun 25, 2013||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US8497814||Oct 12, 2006||Jul 30, 2013||Fractus, S.A.||Slim triple band antenna array for cellular base stations|
|US8558741||Mar 9, 2011||Oct 15, 2013||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US8610627||Mar 2, 2011||Dec 17, 2013||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US8723742||Jun 26, 2012||May 13, 2014||Fractus, S.A.||Multiband antenna|
|US8738103||Dec 21, 2006||May 27, 2014||Fractus, S.A.||Multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices|
|US8743004||Dec 14, 2009||Jun 3, 2014||Dedi David HAZIZA||Integrated waveguide cavity antenna and reflector dish|
|US8754824||Jul 2, 2013||Jun 17, 2014||Fractus, S.A.||Slim triple band antenna array for cellular base stations|
|US8896493||Jun 22, 2012||Nov 25, 2014||Fractus, S.A.||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US8941541||Jan 2, 2013||Jan 27, 2015||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US8976069||Jan 2, 2013||Mar 10, 2015||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US9000985||Jan 2, 2013||Apr 7, 2015||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US9054421||Jan 2, 2013||Jun 9, 2015||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US9099773||Apr 7, 2014||Aug 4, 2015||Fractus, S.A.||Multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices|
|US9240632||Jun 27, 2013||Jan 19, 2016||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US9331382||Oct 3, 2013||May 3, 2016||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US9362617||Aug 13, 2015||Jun 7, 2016||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US9450305||May 20, 2014||Sep 20, 2016||Fractus, S.A.||Slim triple band antenna array for cellular base stations|
|US20020140615 *||Mar 18, 2002||Oct 3, 2002||Carles Puente Baliarda||Multilevel antennae|
|US20020171601 *||Apr 23, 2002||Nov 21, 2002||Carles Puente Baliarda||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US20030112190 *||Oct 17, 2002||Jun 19, 2003||Baliarda Carles Puente||Advanced multilevel antenna for motor vehicles|
|US20040061656 *||Sep 26, 2002||Apr 1, 2004||Mcgrath Daniel T.||Low profile wideband antenna array|
|US20040119644 *||Apr 24, 2003||Jun 24, 2004||Carles Puente-Baliarda||Antenna system for a motor vehicle|
|US20040145526 *||Oct 15, 2003||Jul 29, 2004||Carles Puente Baliarda||Dual-band dual-polarized antenna array|
|US20040210482 *||Apr 13, 2004||Oct 21, 2004||Tetsuhiko Keneaki||Gift certificate, gift certificate, issuing system, gift certificate using system|
|US20040257285 *||Apr 13, 2004||Dec 23, 2004||Quintero Lllera Ramiro||Multiband antenna|
|US20050128148 *||Jan 12, 2005||Jun 16, 2005||Jaume Anguera Pros||Undersampled microstrip array using multilevel and space-filling shaped elements|
|US20050190106 *||Apr 13, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Jaume Anguera Pros||Multifrequency microstrip patch antenna with parasitic coupled elements|
|US20050195112 *||Apr 20, 2005||Sep 8, 2005||Baliarda Carles P.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20050231427 *||Jun 16, 2005||Oct 20, 2005||Carles Puente Baliarda||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20050259009 *||Apr 8, 2005||Nov 24, 2005||Carles Puente Baliarda||Multilevel antennae|
|US20050264453 *||Jul 12, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Baliarda Carles P||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20060077101 *||Apr 13, 2004||Apr 13, 2006||Carles Puente Baliarda||Loaded antenna|
|US20060290573 *||Jul 12, 2005||Dec 28, 2006||Carles Puente Baliarda||Multilevel antennae|
|US20070132658 *||Feb 6, 2007||Jun 14, 2007||Ramiro Quintero Illera||Multiband antenna|
|US20070152886 *||Mar 15, 2007||Jul 5, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20070194992 *||Oct 17, 2006||Aug 23, 2007||Fractus, S.A.||Multi-level antennae|
|US20070273599 *||Apr 3, 2007||Nov 29, 2007||Adventenna, Inc.||Integrated waveguide antenna and array|
|US20080018543 *||Dec 21, 2006||Jan 24, 2008||Carles Puente Baliarda||Multiple-body-configuration multimedia and smartphone multifunction wireless devices|
|US20080042909 *||Jul 20, 2007||Feb 21, 2008||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US20080048922 *||Oct 31, 2007||Feb 28, 2008||Haziza Dedi D||Integrated waveguide antenna array|
|US20080111755 *||Oct 31, 2007||May 15, 2008||Haziza Dedi David||antenna operable at two frequency bands simultaneously|
|US20080117113 *||Oct 31, 2007||May 22, 2008||Haziza Dedi David||Integrated waveguide cavity antenna and reflector rf feed|
|US20080303739 *||Jun 6, 2008||Dec 11, 2008||Thomas Edward Sharon||Integrated multi-beam antenna receiving system with improved signal distribution|
|US20080316142 *||Nov 16, 2007||Dec 25, 2008||Wavebender, Inc.||Multiple-input switch design|
|US20090058747 *||Nov 13, 2008||Mar 5, 2009||Wavebender, Inc.||Integrated waveguide antenna and array|
|US20090109101 *||Dec 31, 2008||Apr 30, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20090224995 *||Oct 12, 2006||Sep 10, 2009||Carles Puente||Slim triple band antenna array for cellular base stations|
|US20090237316 *||Apr 24, 2009||Sep 24, 2009||Carles Puente Baliarda||Loaded antenna|
|US20090267863 *||Jun 2, 2009||Oct 29, 2009||Carles Puente Baliarda||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|US20090303134 *||Jul 6, 2009||Dec 10, 2009||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20100149061 *||Dec 14, 2009||Jun 17, 2010||Haziza Dedi David||Integrated waveguide cavity antenna and reflector dish|
|US20110163923 *||Mar 9, 2011||Jul 7, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US20110175777 *||Feb 28, 2011||Jul 21, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Multilevel antennae|
|US20110177839 *||Mar 9, 2011||Jul 21, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20110181478 *||Mar 2, 2011||Jul 28, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|US20110181481 *||Feb 3, 2011||Jul 28, 2011||Fractus, S.A.||Space-filling miniature antennas|
|DE2645058A1 *||Oct 6, 1976||Apr 13, 1978||Licentia Gmbh||Antenna system with several individual units - consists of set of antennae between which further units for smaller frequency range are inserted|
|WO2001031747A1 *||Oct 26, 1999||May 3, 2001||Fractus, S.A.||Interlaced multiband antenna arrays|
|WO2004030151A1 *||Sep 19, 2003||Apr 8, 2004||Raytheon Company||Low profile wideband antenna array|
|WO2007139617A3 *||Apr 3, 2007||Nov 27, 2008||Adventenna Inc||Integrated waveguide antenna and array|
|U.S. Classification||343/727, 343/846, 343/786, 343/779|
|International Classification||H01Q13/06, H01Q9/00, H01Q21/24, H01Q21/28, H01Q21/08, H01Q21/06, H01Q5/00, H01Q3/26|
|Cooperative Classification||H01Q5/0075, H01Q21/24, H01Q21/06|
|European Classification||H01Q5/00M2, H01Q21/06, H01Q21/24|