Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3818508 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 25, 1974
Filing dateDec 26, 1972
Priority dateDec 26, 1972
Also published asCA1018301A, CA1018301A1, DE2362325A1
Publication numberUS 3818508 A, US 3818508A, US-A-3818508, US3818508 A, US3818508A
InventorsP Lammers, F Stefan
Original AssigneeGoodyear Tire & Rubber
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Protective headgear
US 3818508 A
Abstract
A protective headgear characterized by microporous semi-flexible polyurethane outer shell and a soft, flexible cellular liner, the outer shell having a density of about 30 to 42 pounds per cubic foot and a deflection test (Z-90 impact) of one inch at about one to 5 pound load and a temperature of 75 DEG F.
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 191 Lammers et a1.

[ PROTECTIVE HEADGEAR [75] Inventors: Peter C. Lammers, Doylestown;

Frank N. Stefan, Akron, both of Ohio [73] Assignee: The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Akron, Ohio [22] Filed: Dec. 26, 1972 [21] Appl. No.: 317,966

[52] U.S. Cl 2/3 R [51] Int. Cl A42b 3/00 [58] Field of Search 2/3 R, 3 A, 3 B, 3 C, 5, 2/6;161/159,160,190

[56] References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,186,004 6/1965 Carline 2/3 R [4 1 June 25, 1974 3,242,500 3/1966 Derr 2/3 R 3,365,725 1/1968 Webb 2/3 R 3,447,163 6/1969 3,501,772 3/1970 3,616,463 11/1971 Theodore et a1 2/3 R Primary Examiner-James R. Boler Assistant ExaminerWai M. Chan Attorney, Agent, or Firm-F. W. Brunner; J. D. Wolfe [57] ABSTRACT A protective headgear characterized by microporous semi-flexible polyurethane outer shell and a soft, flexible cellular liner, the outer shell having a density of about 30 to 42 pounds per cubic foot and a deflection test (Z-90 impact) of one inch at about one to 5 pound load and a temperature of 75F.

3 Claims, 2 Drawing Figures This invention relates to a nonrigid protective headgear. More particularly, it relates to helmets and the method of construction. The term protective headgear has traditionally been used to cover helmets and related protective devices for use in protecting vehicular riders such as motorcycle, automobile and motor bike riders. Also, it has been used to cover the devices used in sports, such as baseball, football and hockey, and in the military service for protecting people in the Air Force, Navy and Army. The protective headgear traditionally has comprised these elements, the first being a rigid outer shell; second, a soft head-contacting liner therein, with a means such as a strap sling to adjust the liner to fit the contour of the wearers head; and third, an anchor means for anchoring the outer shell with the inner strap sling liner on the wearers head, this being traditionally a chin strap device.

Heretofore, the protective headgear has almost universally been comprised of a rigid outer shell member and this rigid outer shell member in some embodiments could extend outward over the face in a bill-like projection or in other embodiments could extend down in the back like a tail to protect the wearers neck. In some instances it has been desirable that some embodiments of the outer shell be shaped to permit ear phones or like special apparatus to be fitted in or on the shell.

Although the protective headgear has been used extensively for ages it has had a number of drawbacks, one of the principal ones being that the outer shell was rigid and had to depend on the inner sling liner or undershell and the means for adjusting the sling liner to distribute the impact to the wearers head.

Also, the rigid outer shell was able to function as a sound deadener or as an insulator from heat. Thus, where the helmet is to be worn on a motorcycle or around aircraft it is very desirable that the outer shell be able to act as a sound or noise deadener.

An object of this invention is to provide a protective headgear wherein the outer shell is nonrigid and is capable of acting as an energy absorber through compression of itself as well as a noise absorber and a heat insulating means. A further object is to provide a protective headgear that is lighter in weight than that normally obtained with the rigid outer shell member.

In the accompanying drawings wherein FIG. 1 is a perspective view in side elevation with a portion cut away to show one embodiment of the shell liner relationship and FIG. 2 is a front view in elevation without the chin strap.

In the drawing, the outer shell 5 is shown as having an enlarged area or flange 6 near the outer edge of the outer shell. This enlarged rounded flange member functions in the capacity of imparting greater strength to the outer shell and also, since it is semi-flexible, permits the distribution of any unusual loads in contact with the neck to be more readily distributed. Resting within the outer shell is a head contacting liner which can be both a flexible soft foam, cork, etc., liner and a strap means, viz., an adjustable head band 8 for adjusting the fit of the liner to the wearers head and this means for adjusting the fit of the liner to the wearers head may be any of the well-known devices for achieving this, such as straps or headbands. Also, it should be noted that the means for anchoring the protective headgear on the wearer is riveted or otherwise attached to or through the outer shell and extends down and to a means such as a slip buckle 10 that may be fastened or unfastened or adjusted whereby the protective headgear can be fastened under the chin of the wearer.

The outer shell has been described as being nonrigid and semi-flexible in nature. Also, the outer shell is usu- V ally smooth but this smoothness may be varied to give a decorative or more aesthetic design to the helmet as described above in regard to the flange around the outer extremity. The outer shell may be formed by pouring a liquid foamable polyurethane reaction mixture into a mold having the contour of the outer shell to form a porous semi-rigid outer shell member. This outer shell member may be removed from the mold and the head contacting liner placed therein. The liner may be secured to the outer shell in any of the well-known manners, for instance, by riveting, bolting or adhesively adhering thereto.

The nature of this invention can more readily be appreciated and understood by reference to the following exemplary and representative examples where all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise indicated.

EXAMPLE I A polyester fiberglass helmet shell mold of the helmet type shown in FIG. 1 was assembled and given a coating of a polyethylene mold release agent. Then the cavity of the shell mold was charged with sufficient amount of a liquid foamable polyurethane reaction mixture to fill the mold and preferably develop a slight positive pressure, usually approximately 0.5 to 45 pounds per square inch during the foaming of the mixture. The charge in the mold is let stand until cured, usually about 15 to 60 minutes if at elevated temperature, but if at room temperature a longer time may pass before opening the mold and stripping out the semiflexible microporous shell.

The shell is desirably given a decorative coat of an elastomeric paint to give the shell the desired color and appearance. Alternately, the liquid foamable polyurethane mixture'is dyed or pigmented to eliminate the need to paint the shell. Also, the shell can be bored or punched to provide the bolt or rivet holes 11.

The soft liner can be prepared bypouring a soft flexible polyurethane reaction mixture in the liner mold and allowing it to foam and cure. This liner is placed in the shell and preferably adhered therein by use of a thin layer of the flexible polyurethane reaction mixture as an adhesive. The soft liner can be made by theuse of any of the well-known soft flexible polyurethane reaction mixtures that give a foam of about 2.5 to 20 pounds per cubic foot in density and a compression set of to percent by ASTM Method 2204.

The semi-flexible foam for the outer shell was made by mixing in an Admiral Foam Machine the following recipe:

Preblended resin* 100 parts Triethylene diamine 0.07 part Dibutyl tin dilaurate 0.10 part Quadrol 8.0 parts Water 0.35 art diethylene glycol. Foams of this type have a density of about 30 to 55 pounds per cubic foot.

The soft, flexible helmet liner foams were made by mixing the ingredients on an Admiral Foam Machine using the following recipe:

Parts Resin 100 Water 1.5 Calcium stearate 3,0 Triethylene diamine 1.0 Stannous octoate 0.25 Mondur MRS 78.1

85/1 5 percent blend of a 4500 molecular weight ethylene oxide capped polypropylene ether triol and 400 molecular weight polypropylene oxide based sucrose polymer.

"Mondur MRS is a Crude polymeric isocyunatc of methane di( phenyl isocynnate) i.c. MD] of approx imatcly 40 percent 4.4-MD1, percent 2.4-MDl and 50 percent trifunctional higher analogues of 2.4- and 4,4-MD1.

Polyurethane reaction mixtures that yield microporous polyurethanes of about 30 to 42 pounds per cubic foot, Shore A hardness of 80 to 100, puncture resistance of 60 to 100 pounds, hammer cold crease resistance to 40F. and exhibit a 1-inch deflection under loads of about 1 to 5 pounds at 75 F. and 5 to 10 pounds at l4F. are satisfactory for the shell of this invention. The puncture test measures the resistance in pounds to the penetration of a push of one-eighth inch diameter flat head pin type through a one-fourth inch thick sample. The hammer crease test is run at decreasing cold temperature at 10F. intervals until the sample fails under hammer impact. The deflection test (Z-90 impact) is' run usually at 75F. and l4F. and the amount of deflection of a inch X 1 inch X 6 inch strip when suspended on a 4 inch span on a load is applied at the center to effect a deflection which is recorded as the inches of deflection at the specified load.

Referring to FIG. 1, it will be seen that in this embodiment'a polystyrene foam head member 12 is positioned inside the liners 7 to adjust the liner to the contour of the wearers head. It is preferred that this polystyrene foam head member have a compression set of at least 90 to l00'percent. Also, the polystyrene foam head member 12 is covered with a soil preventing member 13, usually of fabric such as nylon, polyester 0r cellulose types. The soil preventing member 13 can be used to give the helmet varying sizes in the manner customarily achieved by stuffing behind a headband.

Any of the well known polyurethane reaction mixtures that yield microporous polyurethane or foams having compression set of to 100 percent at 2.5 to 20 pounds per cubic foot can be used. Also, it should be appreciated that the impact resistance of the microporous polyurethane can be varied readily by use of a trito hem-functional crosslinker as the curative in about 0.5 to 1.0 mole per mole of excess organic poly isocyanate. The organic polyisocyanate is used in excess relative to the polyester or polyether and usually about 1.5 to 3.5 moles per mole. The ingredients useful in making polyurethane reaction mixtures are well i1- lustrated in US. Pat. No. 3,680,329.

While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown for the purpose of illustrating the invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:

1. A protective headgear adapted to protect the head, comprising a microporous semi-flexible polyurethane outer shell, a head-contacting liner within the shell ofa soft, flexible cellular material, said liner having means to adjust the liner to fit the contour of the wearers head, said outer shell having a density of about 30 to 42 pounds per cubic foot and a deflection test (Z- impact) of 1 inch at about 1 to 5 pound load and a temperature of 75F.

2. The headgear of claim 1 in which the means to adjust the liner comprises a band secured to the liner.

3. The headgear of claim 1 wherein a polystyrene foam head member of 90 percent or more compression set is placed in the liner as the means to adjust the liner to fit the contour of the wearers head.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3186004 *Jun 7, 1962Jun 1, 1965Richard E CarliniProtective helmet
US3242500 *Aug 24, 1964Mar 29, 1966John W DerrProtective head covering
US3365725 *Feb 10, 1966Jan 30, 1968American Safety EquipSafety helmet
US3447163 *Feb 13, 1967Jun 3, 1969Peter W BothwellSafety helmets
US3501772 *May 8, 1968Mar 24, 1970Sierra Eng CoSporting safety helmet
US3616463 *Jul 6, 1970Nov 2, 1971Mine Safety Appliances CoShock absorbing helmet
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4038700 *Jun 11, 1976Aug 2, 1977Gyoery KalmanSafety helmets for motorcyclists or the like
US4064565 *May 13, 1976Dec 27, 1977Griffiths William SHelmet structure
US4075717 *Jan 22, 1976Feb 28, 1978Lemelson Jerome HHelmate
US4937888 *May 31, 1988Jul 3, 1990Straus Albert EHelmet cover
US5724681 *Nov 22, 1996Mar 10, 1998Sykes; BobShock-absorbing helmet cover
US5887289 *Nov 7, 1997Mar 30, 1999Theoret; NormandSafety cap with removable fabric cover
US6101636 *Nov 27, 1996Aug 15, 2000Williams; MarixSculptured helmet ornamentation
US6389607Sep 26, 2000May 21, 2002James C. WoodSoft foam sport helmet
US6425141 *Jul 30, 1998Jul 30, 2002CerebrixProtective helmet
US6453476 *Dec 21, 2000Sep 24, 2002Team Wendy, LlcProtective helmet
US7124449 *Mar 30, 2004Oct 24, 2006Gentex CorporationProtective helmet assembly having lightweight suspension system
US7240376 *Aug 18, 2005Jul 10, 2007Riddell, Inc.Sports helmet
US7954177 *Jan 10, 2007Jun 7, 2011Riddell, Inc.Sports helmet
US8117679 *Mar 22, 2006Feb 21, 2012Fox Head, Inc.Molded articles and molding methods particularly for a protective helmet
US8528118Jun 3, 2011Sep 10, 2013Riddell, Inc.Sports helmet
US8640267Sep 14, 2012Feb 4, 2014Yochanan CohenProtective helmet
US8911015Mar 5, 2013Dec 16, 2014Yochanan CohenCar seat
US8938818 *Mar 15, 2013Jan 27, 2015Riddell, Inc.Sports helmet
US9289024May 2, 2011Mar 22, 2016Riddell, Inc.Protective sports helmet
US9398783Jul 3, 2013Jul 26, 2016Kranos Ip CorporationHelmet with shell having raised central channel and ear holes with abutting slopped banks
US9487110Mar 5, 2014Nov 8, 2016Pidyon Controls Inc.Car seat
US20050217006 *Mar 30, 2004Oct 6, 2005Brad SutterProtective helmet assembly having lightweight suspension system
US20050278835 *Aug 18, 2005Dec 22, 2005Ide Thad MSports helmet
US20070192944 *Jan 10, 2007Aug 23, 2007Ide Thad MSports helmet
US20070220662 *Mar 22, 2006Sep 27, 2007Fox Racing, Inc.Molded articles and molding methods particularly for a protective helmet
US20080240775 *Mar 27, 2008Oct 2, 2008Brother Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaCartridge and Image Forming Apparatus
US20120317704 *Jun 19, 2012Dec 20, 2012Daniel CoyleNatural Fiber Helmet
US20140259313 *Mar 18, 2014Sep 18, 2014Janet Alan SullivanProtective Helmet
USD708395Aug 23, 2013Jul 1, 2014Joey LaRocqueProtective helmet
USD774257Feb 11, 2015Dec 13, 2016Joey LaRocqueHelmet
USRE46249Jan 30, 2015Dec 27, 2016Joey LaRocqueProtective helmet
DE2724984A1 *Jun 2, 1977Dec 8, 1977RenaultSchutzhelm
WO1990014025A1 *May 22, 1990Nov 29, 1990Frank Anthony MatichCrash helmet
WO1999049745A1 *Mar 19, 1999Oct 7, 1999Niels DahlProtective helmet
WO2005096857A2 *Mar 28, 2005Oct 20, 2005Gentex CorporationProtective helmet assembly having lightweight suspension system
WO2005096857A3 *Mar 28, 2005Jan 26, 2006Gentex CorpProtective helmet assembly having lightweight suspension system
Classifications
U.S. Classification2/412, 2/903
International ClassificationA42B3/12
Cooperative ClassificationA42B3/121, Y10S2/903
European ClassificationA42B3/12B