Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3819007 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 25, 1974
Filing dateApr 27, 1973
Priority dateApr 27, 1973
Publication numberUS 3819007 A, US 3819007A, US-A-3819007, US3819007 A, US3819007A
InventorsMorrow D, Wirt L
Original AssigneeLockheed Aircraft Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Controllable laminar sound absorptive structure
US 3819007 A
An acoustical facing sheet comprising a permeable member having perforations therethrough and tubular elements extending therefrom on one side in register with said perforations. The structure provides a lumped acoustic impedance having an acoustic resistance proportional to frequency, and an acoustic inertance that is inversely proportional to frequency. It permits the design of highly efficient laminar-type sound attenuating panel structures having an unusually low first resonant frequency without impairing performance at the higher frequencies, and occupying smaller volume than prior devices.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

[45] June 25, 1974 United States Patent [191 Wirt et al.

XXX GGG 333 333 S UHU N www@ NUT m m m A mmmme.. W H :MP A .m m m R O mm n amaN HJD E T mmmA 999 P Mmmm m O F [54] CONTROLLABLE LAMINAR SOUND 3,525,663 ABSORPTIVE STRUCTURE /gg [75] Inventors: Leslie Spencer Wirt, Newhall; 7

Duane Lloyd Morrow, Saugus, both of Calif.

[73] Assignee: Lockheed Aircraft Corporation,

Burbank, Calif.

Apr. 27, 1973 Appl. No.: 355,161

Assistant Examiner-Vit W. Miska [22] Filed:

Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Billy G. Corber; Ralph M. Flygare ABSTRACT [52] U.S. 181/33 G,

l CONTROLLABLE LAMINAR SOUND ABSORPTIVE STRUCTURE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Permeable sheet materials are widely used in the construction of sound absorptive panels. When used as a facing over a compartmented airspace, such materials are known as laminar absorbers. Such a structure has the property that the resistive component of its acoustic impedance is essentially constant and is not a function of frequency.

It has been discovered from an examination of the solutions to certain wave equations that attenuation in acoustically treated ducts could be singifcantly improved if the acoustic resistance of the duct walls were a particular function of the frequency to be attenuated. The optimum value of the resistance starts at a predetermined value at low frequencies and increases uniformly with increasing frequency to within a predetermined value at the maximum frequency of interest. In the case of an aircraft turbine-engine inlet, to attenuate the highest frequency the resistance desired may be eight times the resistance desired to attenuate the lowest frequency, Materials of the prior art have not been able to provide these properties.

Typical laminar sound absorbers of the prior art are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,502,171 to Cowan and 3,507,355 to Lawson. A typical acoustic face sheet is also shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,700,067 to Dobbs et al. These prior art devices do not yield the desired, previously-discussed, property whereby the resistance component of the acoustic impedance is a desired function of frequency.

SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION There is provided by the present invention an apertured facing sheet in which the resistance component of the acoustic impedance is completely controllable. Thus, it may be tailored to be optimum for any given application. The structure comprises apermeable facing sheet modified by the addition of an array of ducted ports of specified dimensions. This facing, used over any of several types of air-cavity structures, provides a lower tuning frequency without the usual highfrequency rolloff penalty. It closely follows an ideal facing sheet in that it is characterized by a resistance that increases with frequency and a large initial inertance (inductance) that decreases rapidly toward zero as frequency increases.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. l is a perspective view of a first embodiment showing the facing Asheet constructed in accordance with the invention together with a back panel and a cavity-type structure interposed therebetween.

FIG. 2 is a side cross-sectional view of a single collared aperture, constructed in accordance with a second embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a side cross-sectional view of a third embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 4'is a schematic diagram of an equivalent electrical circuit network, useful in the exposition of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS Referring to the structure shown in FIG. l, a typical embodiment comprises a sheet l of permeable material having a relatively large flow resistance. Typically the flow resistance is ten times the characteristic impedance of the fluid in which the device is to operate. The permeable sheet l may be fabricated from sintered or felted metal, paper, woven or felted fibers, or other similar porous materials. The sheet l is provided with regularly-spaced apertures or perforations therethrough, a typical one of which is indicated at 2. Although the exemplary embodiment of FIG. l shows a pattern of perforations arrayed in an orthogonal grid, it should be understood that other patterns or even random arrangements of the perforations may be employed. Also, the percentage of open area is a design parameter that may vary over a considerable range. The perforations, whether they be in a straight or staggered line may be of various shapes such as round, square, slotted, or of complex decorative shape. Each perforation (2) is provided with a tubular collar such as shown at 3 which extends from one side of the sheet and in registration with the corresponding perforation. Thus, each straight-through passage in the sheet l has an effective length 4 which is considerably greater than the thickness 5 of the sheet 1.

The facing sheet with its integral collared apertures comprises the essence of the invention; however, it should be understood that the invention is especially useful in conjunction with a laminar absorber, or other compartmented airspace type of sound absorber, such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,734,234 entitled Sound Absorption Structure, of common assignee herewith.

FIG. l shows the present invention as used in conjunction with the aforesaid compartmented sound absorber. This assembly comprises impermeable backing sheet 6, impermeable wall members (typically such as those indicated at 7 and 8) which divide the device into a plurality of cellular compartments, and oblique permeable partitions 9 and l0 located within a compartment. The structure comprising elements 6-10 has the properties that the resistive component of its acoustic impedance is essentially constant and is not a function of frequency. This is in contradistinction to the property of the present invention wherein the acoustic resistance is proportional to frequency and the acoustic inertance is inversely proportional to frequency.

The acoustical behavior of the above-described assembly may be best understood in terms of its acoustical elements and their electrical analogs. Circuit elements and their acoustic analogs are listed below:

Electrical Acoustical Common Symbol Resistance Resistance R lnductance lnertance L Capacitance Capacitance C meable facing sheets, R and L are approximate constants, independent of frequency.

There is shown in FIG. 2 a detailed portion of a second embodiment of the invention comprising a perforated structure having 50 percent open perforations in the planar, or sheet portion 12 of the structure. Typical perforations are indicated at 13 and 14. At spaced intervals, a depending hollow collar portion 15 extends downwardly from the bottom face of the sheet portion 12. A porous, or permeable, outer lamina overlies, or is bonded to, sheet portion 12. The outer lamina 16 is provided with apertures, such as the one indicated at 17, which are coaxially aligned with the passage 18 through collar portion 15. The described structural elements are repeated at fixed regular spacings in the manner shown in FIG. 1. The lamina 16 provides part of the desired flow resistance; the remaining part of the flow resistance is provided by sheet portion 12.

There is shownin FIG. 3 an alternative construction which is functionally the equivalent of the structure shown in FIG. 2. This embodiment comprises a twopart laminated sheet comprising flow resistive lamina 19 and 50 percent open perforate lamina 20. A rivetlike hollow tubular element 21 extends through the laminated sheet (19-20) and has its upper flange end 22 flush with the outer surface of lamina 19 and its lower end extending beyond the outer surface of lamina 20. The dependent end of the tubular element 2l may bel chamfered as shown in FIG. 3 to permit the element to be driven through the laminated sheet (19-20) by a suitable tool (not shown) in order to installthe element. Other suitable manufacturing techniques will be apparent to those versed in the art, it being only necessary that the effective length of the passage through the tubular element be considerablyv greater than the thickness of the laminated structure through which it extends.

The electrical network analog of an area of the sheet is shown in FIG. 4. A large resistance R1 is connected in parallel with several other circuit branches. Each of the circuit branches consists of a small resistance, nR2, in series with an inductance, nL2, when n is the number of such side branches (per unit area).

The impedance of the nth resistance and inductance is the series combination of the two; therefore:

The inductive side branches are all in parallel so the total impedance of the side branches per unit area is:

But, R, and Z2 are also in parallel circuits and thus are combined by adding their admittances:

The trends of the circuit response may be visualized by noting the limiting cases:

w 00 Thus, the resistance is about R2 at low frequencies and about R1 at high frequencies. The inductance is also a function of frequency and tends to vanish at high frequency:

and for R, R2

Lim L L2 and for all values of R1 Lim L 0 By direct analogy, the acoustic resistance of the permeable sheet l without the tubular collar 3 (as shown in FIG. l) corresponds to R1, the small acoustical resistance in each collared hole corresponds to nR2 and the acoustic nertance of the mass of air in the tubular passages (3) corresponds to nL2. Each acoustic resistance, nR2, is is series with nertance, nL2. The large acoustic resistance R1 is in parallel with all the side branches exactly as in the electrical analogy.

Thus, it will be seen that a wide range of variations is possible. For example, in a practical construction permeable sheet materials may be fabricated which actually contain a small series inertance which has been neglected in the above-discussed analysis for the sake of simplicity.

The parallel branches need not be identical to each other. The essence of the invention is the paralleling of acoustic elements in the facing sheet such that the end effect is a resistance which increases with frequency. The decreasing value of net nertance is also a desirable characteristic since it means that, for example, a laminar absorber to be applied as a facing will have an unusually low first resonant frequency, but at higher frequencies the nertance will become small such that the high frequency performance is not impaired. By separately designing R1, and nR2, and nL2, a wide range of characteristics may be obtained.

The value R1 is controlled by the composition of the permeable sheet per se. The value nR2 is controlled by the size of the perforations (2) through the sheet (l) and their depth. The value nL2 is controlled by the size and length of the collared apertures (3). It is preferred that the perforations through the sheet (and their various coaxial passages) be quite closely spaced compared to a wavelength of the highest frequency of interest.

Table I below sets forth comparative test results which illustrate normal incidence sound absorption coefficients, as a function of frequency, obtained for various acoustical facings. The sound absorption coefficients were measured by means of a commercial Bruel and Kjaer Standing Wave Apparatus, using the standard test procedure set forth by ASTM C-3 84-5 8. The test specimens were assembled from the following components:

l. Permeable felted metal facing having a throughflow resistance of cgs rayls;

2. A brass tubular collar having an inner diameter of 0.22 inch and a length 0.290 inch; and,

3. An absorptive main body of l inch thick fiberglass.

The specimens were assembled into a standard Bruel and Kjaer variable depth specimen holder with the l inch deep fiberglass main body absorber being spaced first at 1A inch from the permeable facing sheet for the first series of tests, and then at l inch from the permeable facing sheet for the second series of tests. The l inch thick fiberglass material comprises the conventional main body absorber with which the novel facing sheet of the invention cooperates. This is the functional equivalent of the structure comprising elements 6-10.

The following three test configurations are representative of three separate structural designs each intended to provide good low frequency absorption in a limited space. The first design, identified as Type A, comprises a resistive permeable facing sheet overlaying a main-body absorber, and is typical of acoustical panels such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,712,846. The second design, identified as Type B, comprises an impermeable facing sheet with spaced apertures therethrough overlying a main-body absorber, and is typical of devices such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,174,580. The third design, identified as Type C, is constructed in accordance with the present invention.

TABLE l 2 INCH OVERALL DEPTH ll/z INCH OVERALL DEPTH Hz Type A B C Type A B C PRIOR ART TYPE A A 100 rayl resistive facing was placed in front of a fiberglass main-body absorber, to serve as a protective facing and to increase the total acoustic resistance. It is well known, to those skilled in the art, that fiberglass alone will provide a first absorption coefficient maximum near 1,600 Hz where the overall depth of the facing and the main absorber is 2 inches, (or 2,500 Hz where the depth is 1.25 inches), but the lower frequency response can be improved by overdamping with the resistive facing at the expense of the high frequency absorption. 1n the case of the tests shown in Table l, the heavy damping resulted in absorption coefficients of about 0.75 starting at 500 Hz for the 2 inch depth and 630 Hz for the 1.25 inch depth.

PRIOR ART TYPE B An alternate, and well-known, approach to a low frequency problem is the Helmholtz resonator such as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,174,580 to Schultz. The resonator contains supplemental resistive material such as fiberglass in the cavity. An example of the large inertance (acoustical inertia) in the collared hole in series combination with the resonator airspace provides a low frequency absorption peak, but results in a nearly total loss of high frequency absorption. This is clearly illustrated in the data of Table I. The absorption spectra consists of single peaks a 0.86 at 400 Hz for the 2 inch depth and a 0.99 at 500 Hz for the 1.25 inch depth. Clearly such prior art design is most useful for the absorption of a single pure tone.

PRESENT INVENTION TYPE C The facing sheet structure of the present invention comprises a collared aperture and the resistive facing sheet in acoustically parallel combination. The resulting absorption coefficient spectra, as indicated in Table l, shows a substantial improvement in low-frequency response as compared to the Type-A configuration, and also an improved high-frequency response as compared to either the Type-B configuration or the Type-A configuration. These improvements are equally apparent in the case of either the 2 inch depth or the 1.25 inch depth.

The improved response of the present invention (Type-C) results directly from the fact that it provides both inertance and resistance that vary with frequency in a desirable and useful way. The inertance 1 of the Helmholtz resonator is constant. As a result, the positive reactance wl (w 21rf, f= frequency) increases in direct proportion to frequency. At some value of frequency this reactance cancels the negative reactance of the airspace and creates a resonant response. At all higher frequencies the constantly increasing reactance results in the rapid deterioration of the high-frequency absorption, because the large positive reactance reflects the sound and does not permit it to enter the cavity.

The resistive facing alone broadens the frequency response of the fiberglass by extending it to lower frequencies but can do so only at the expense of higher frequency absorption.

The present invention provides a large value of inertance to move the initial peak downward in frequency. As frequency increases, however, the inertance diminishes smoothly and rapidly such that the highfrequency response is not impaired. The resistance of the present invention asymptotically rises to that of the facing hseet alone as its inertance vanishes. Note in the date of Table l that the absorption coefficients of the Type-C and the Type-A converge at the highest frequency.

In summary, there is provided by the structures shown in FIGS. 1-3, apparatus having broadband absorption extending to moderately low frequencies and for which the allowable space is constrained.

It will be apparent to those versed in the art that various modifications may be made to the representative embodiments of the invention shown and described above.

What is claimed is:

l. An acoustical facing for a laminar sound absorber of the type comprising an array of open-ended resonant compartments, said facing comprising:

a sheet of permeable material through which have been fonned a multiplicity of holes, said holes '7 being smaller than the open ends of said compartments and spaced apart for registration with said open ends; and,

a multiplicity of means for providing a passage which extends from each of said holes into a corresponding compartment of said array.

2. An acoustical facing as defined in claim 1 wherein the material comprising said permeable sheet is characterized by having a finite lumped acoustic impedance which is predominantly resistive.

3. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein said passage providing means are characterized by having a lumped acoustic impedance which is partly resistive and partly positive reactive.

4. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein the material comprising said permeable sheet is characterized by having a finite lumped acoustic impedance which is predominantly resistive, and wherein said passage providing means are characterized by having a lumped acoustic impedance which is partly resistive and partly positive reactive, and whereby the lumped acoustic impedances of said permeable sheet and said passage providing means are in parallel to the flow of acoustic energy.

5. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein said sheet of permeable material comprises:

a first planar lamina of porous material; and

a second lamina, co-planar with said first lamina,

having open perforations therethrough.

6. An acoustical facing as defined in claim 5 wherein 8 i i each of said passage providing means comprises:

an outwardly extending hollow collar integral with said second lamina.

7. An acoustical facing as defined in claim 5 wherein each of said passage providing means comprises:

a hollow tubular element extending through said first and second laminae.

8. An acoustical facing as defined in claim 1 wherein the cross-sectional area of each of said passage providing means is substantially coextensive with the crosssectional area of its corresponding hole.

9. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein the axis of the passage through each of said passage providing means is normal to said sheet.

10. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein said holes are of uniform size.

1l. An acoustical facing as defined in claim 1 wherein said holes are circular and said passage providing means are cylindrical.

12. An acoustical facing as defined in claim l wherein the finite lumped acoustic impedance of said facing, defined as R +jwL, is a predetermined function of the angular frequency w such that R increases monotonically with frequency and wL first increases, and then decreases as frequency increases; where R is the resistive component of said impedance, j is l, w is two 1r times the frequency of interest, and L is the acoustic inertance of said facing.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2280631 *May 15, 1939Apr 21, 1942Burgess Battery CoFacing sheet for sound absorbing material
US2755882 *Apr 22, 1952Jul 24, 1956Mario MaccaferriAcoustic tiles
US2984312 *Apr 24, 1959May 16, 1961Owens Corning Fiberglass CorpAcoustical wall board
US3161385 *Jun 15, 1960Dec 15, 1964Coleman Kramer IncMeans and method for stabilizing laminar boundary layer flow
US3174580 *Apr 28, 1961Mar 23, 1965Schulz Carl GAcoustical tile construction
US3227598 *Dec 2, 1960Jan 4, 1966Robb Wayne FCore structure
US3231454 *Apr 14, 1961Jan 25, 1966Cadillac ProductsCushioning material
US3525663 *Mar 9, 1967Aug 25, 1970Hale Jesse RAnticlastic cellular core structure having biaxial rectilinear truss patterns
US3622430 *Nov 24, 1969Nov 23, 1971Jurisich Peter LDimpled sheet structural laminate
US3712846 *Jun 23, 1971Jan 23, 1973Carpenter L & CoAcoustical panel
GB732079A * Title not available
GB1147492A * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4084366 *Nov 14, 1975Apr 18, 1978Haworth Mfg., Inc.Sound absorbing panel
US4084367 *Jan 24, 1977Apr 18, 1978Haworth Mfg., Inc.Sound absorbing panel
US4100993 *Apr 15, 1976Jul 18, 1978United Technologies CorporationAcoustic liner
US4135603 *Aug 19, 1976Jan 23, 1979United Technologies CorporationSound suppressor liners
US4150732 *Jan 3, 1978Apr 24, 1979Societe Nationale D'etude Et De Construction De Moteurs D'aviationResonant cavity devices for reducing noise within a duct in the presence of a gaseous fluid
US4189027 *Dec 12, 1977Feb 19, 1980United Technologies CorporationSound suppressor liners
US4231447 *Mar 20, 1979Nov 4, 1980Rolls-Royce LimitedMulti-layer acoustic linings
US4319661 *Feb 4, 1980Mar 16, 1982The Proudfoot Company, Inc.Acoustic space absorber unit
US4944362 *Nov 25, 1988Jul 31, 1990General Electric CompanyClosed cavity noise suppressor
US5100730 *Nov 16, 1989Mar 31, 1992Lambers Thomas JStructural reinforcement apparatus and method of making same
US5310586 *Feb 5, 1993May 10, 1994Eldim, Inc.Angled I-beam honeycomb structure
US5491307 *Oct 5, 1990Feb 13, 1996Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationPorous single expansion ramp
US5491310 *Sep 7, 1994Feb 13, 1996Jen; Wang H.Acoustic board
US5512715 *Jun 14, 1994Apr 30, 1996Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Sound absorber
US5543198 *Jul 24, 1989Aug 6, 1996Short Brothers PlcNoise attenuation panel
US5723831 *Feb 18, 1997Mar 3, 1998Herman Miller Inc.Tackable acoustical barrier panel
US5782082 *Jun 13, 1996Jul 21, 1998The Boeing CompanyAircraft engine acoustic liner
US5962823 *May 15, 1996Oct 5, 1999Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Noise insulating wall structure
US6012543 *Mar 9, 1998Jan 11, 2000Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.Sound isolation plate structure
US6209679May 15, 1998Apr 3, 2001The Boeing CompanyAircraft engine acoustic liner and method of making same
US6360844Apr 2, 2001Mar 26, 2002The Boeing CompanyAircraft engine acoustic liner and method of making the same
US6371240 *May 23, 2000Apr 16, 2002Austin Acoustic Systems, Inc.Anechoic chamber
US6509081Sep 28, 2000Jan 21, 2003The Boeing CompanyNo-septum acoustic sandwich panel, and apparatus and method for suppressing noise in a nozzle
US6817442 *Mar 29, 2002Nov 16, 2004Intel CorporationAcoustically insulated bezel
US7033137Mar 19, 2004Apr 25, 2006Ametek, Inc.Vortex blower having helmholtz resonators and a baffle assembly
US7552796 *Jun 30, 2009United Technologies CorporationTurbine engine tailcone resonator
US7819224 *Jan 20, 2005Oct 26, 2010Eads Deutschland GmbhAssembly for reducing noise in turbofan engines
US7923092Aug 22, 2005Apr 12, 2011Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LlcDie cut insulation blanket and method for producing same
US8133568Jul 18, 2008Mar 13, 2012Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LlcDie cut insulation blanket
US8205287Jun 26, 2012Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, LlcInsulation element for an electrical appliance such as a dishwasher
US8381872 *May 5, 2009Feb 26, 20133M Innovative Properties CompanyAcoustic composite
US8689936 *Dec 11, 2012Apr 8, 2014Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KgAcoustic absorber having conical inserts
US8783412 *Jan 19, 2012Jul 22, 2014Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KgSound absorber for a gas turbine exhaust cone, and method for the production thereof
US8835883 *Jun 3, 2011Sep 16, 2014Hitachi High-Technologies CorporationCharged particle radiation device and soundproof cover
US20030072934 *Aug 30, 2002Apr 17, 2003Rem KoolhaasPanel for architectural design
US20050241877 *Jun 25, 2003Nov 3, 2005Czerny Hans RSound absorber comprising two parts delimiting a hollow space
US20060059801 *Sep 15, 2004Mar 23, 2006Quality Research Development & Consulting, Inc.Acoustically intelligent structures with resonators
US20070042156 *Aug 22, 2005Feb 22, 2007Rockwell Anthony LDie cut insulation blanket and method for producing same
US20070251760 *Apr 27, 2006Nov 1, 2007United Technologies CorporationTurbine engine tailcone resonator
US20080308345 *Jan 20, 2005Dec 18, 2008Eads Deutschland GmbhAssembly for Reducing Noise in Turbofan Engines
US20100024851 *Aug 4, 2009Feb 4, 2010Rockwell Anthony LInsulation Element For An Electrical Appliance Such As A Dishwasher
US20110048850 *May 5, 2009Mar 3, 2011Alexander Jonathan HAcoustic composite
US20120247867 *Oct 14, 2010Oct 4, 2012Jun YangComposite sound-absorbing device with built in resonant cavity
US20130082194 *Jun 3, 2011Apr 4, 2013Daisuke MutoCharged particle radiation device and soundproof cover
US20130306401 *Jan 19, 2012Nov 21, 2013Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KgSound absorber for a gas turbine exhaust cone, and method for the production thereof
US20150027629 *Jul 29, 2013Jan 29, 2015The Boeing CompanySeptumization of Honeycomb Sandwiches
US20150090526 *May 23, 2013Apr 2, 20153M Innovative Properties CompanySound absorbing (acoustic) board
EP0352993A1 *Jul 24, 1989Jan 31, 1990Short Brothers PlcNoise attenuation panel
EP1662480A1 *Aug 31, 2004May 31, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko ShoSound absorbing structure and method of producing the same
WO1990000968A1 *Jul 24, 1989Feb 8, 1990Short Brothers PlcNoise attenuation panel
WO1992012854A1 *Jan 21, 1992Aug 6, 1992Short Brothers PlcStructural cellular component
WO2011082510A1 *Oct 14, 2010Jul 14, 2011Institute Of Acoustics, Chinese Academy Of SciencesCompound sound absorption device with built-in resonant cavity
U.S. Classification181/286, 428/116, 428/131
International ClassificationE04B1/84, G10K11/172, G10K11/00, E04B1/86, E04B1/74
Cooperative ClassificationE04B2001/8433, E04B2001/8428, G10K11/172, E04B2001/748, E04B1/86
European ClassificationE04B1/86, G10K11/172