Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3827340 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 6, 1974
Filing dateDec 8, 1972
Priority dateAug 6, 1971
Publication numberUS 3827340 A, US 3827340A, US-A-3827340, US3827340 A, US3827340A
InventorsKeck J, Rowley J
Original AssigneeLudlow Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Fracturable adhesive backing tool
US 3827340 A
A process and apparatus for selectively compressing paper stock of the type which is used as a protective backing sheet for adhesive-coated systems. The process comprises use of a novel compression tool, the precise characteristics of which depend on the paper stock being utilized. The compression tool comprises a blunt, rotatable, circular, working edge which has a radius of at least 0.02, but preferably at least 0.04 inches in diameter and at least one half of the thickness of the paper being weakend. This tool advantageously comprises the compressing edge, being mounted integrally with a bearing surface which makes pressure control easier and limits penetration of the tool. In the preferred embodiments of the invention, the bearing surface is faced with elastomeric material. Disclosure is also made of a novel release sheet and adhesive sheet assembly which is manufactured utilizing the process and apparatus of the invention.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent [191 Keck et a1.

[ Aug. 6, 1974 1 FRACTURABLE ADHESIVE BACKING TOOL [75] Inventors: Jerry L. Keck, Chicago; James Robert Rowley, Calumet Park, both of ill.

[73] Assignee: Ludlow Corporation, Needham Heights, Mass.

[22] Filed: Dec. 8, 1972 [21] Appl. No.: 313,241

Related US. Application Data [62] Division of Ser. No. 169,653, Aug. 6, 1971, Pat. No.

[52] US. Cl. 93/58.1, 93/1 R, 93/58 ST [51] int. Cl ..B31b 1/14 [58] Field of Search 93/58 ST, 58.1, 58.2, 58.2 F, 93/58 R, l R, 1 G; 83/1, 6, 8,12, 663

Primary Examiner-Roy Lake Assistant Examiner-James F. Coan Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Cesar.i and McKenna 5 7 ABSTRACT A process and apparatus for selectively compressing paper stock of the type which is used as a protective backing sheet for adhesive-coated systems. The process comprises use of a novel compression tool, the precise characteristics of which depend on the paper stock being utilized. The compression tool comprises a blunt, rotatable, circular, working edge which has a radius of at least 0.02, but preferably at least 0.04 inches in diameter and at least one half of the thickness of the paper being weakend. This tool advantageously comprises the compressing edge, being mounted integrally with a bearing surface which makes pressure control easier and limits penetration of the tool. In the preferred embodiments of the invention, the bearing surface is faced with elastomeric material. Disclosure is also made of a novel release sheet and adhesive sheet assembly which is manufactured utilizing the process and apparatus of the invention.

1 Claim, 7 Drawing Figures 1 FRACTURABLE ADHESIVE BACKING TOOL RELATED APPLICATION This application is a Divisional Application divided out of U.S. Ser. No. 169,653 filed Aug. 6, 1971, Now U.S. Pat. No. 3,719,584 by Jerry L. Keck and James Robert Rowley and entitled Fracturable Adhesive Backing.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION There have always been a number of problems associated with the use of adhesive-backed papers such as those used as labels, etc. These problems, largely related to avoiding premature contact of the adhesive with other objects, have been largely overcome by the use of releasable backing sheets. The need for convenient removal of labels or other adhesive papers from these release-coated backing sheets raised new problems and a considerable amount of inventive effort has been undertaken in solving such problems.

For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,035,957 to Morgan disclosed a chemical embrittlement process which is used to provide embrittled lines along a backing sheet and thereby facilitate the breaking of the backing sheet and the mechanical removal of the sheet from the adhesive. Such a process avoids the need to mechanically score and cut through the release-coated sheet. The avoidance of cut-through eliminates the problem associated with the seepage of adhesive through the cuts. On the other hand, use of chemical composition present handling problems in the plant, leave an unsightly marking on the sheet, and have a tendency to result in a product that will flake and lint in use.

US Pat. No. 2,319,272 to Starr includes a disclosure of other methods such as knife-scoring, scorching and abrasion of a sheet, to selectively weaken linear portions therealong, on an adhesive-coated rubber patch. Starrs rubber patch may provide an especially high degree of cushioning for the backing sheet being processed; the Starr patent does teach the utility of such support, however.

Thus it is seen that the prior art has utilized various linear weakening techniques such as applying thin lines of acid to chemically weaken selected linear portions of the backing sheet, abrading the sheet to selectively weaken it along the abraded line, cutting through part of the sheet along predetermined lines, etc.

One problem which has interfered with obtaining the maximum product advantage from these processes has been the requirement to leave a rather high safety margin to avoid cutting a slit through the paper during each process. Such cut-through, of course, tends to allow adhesive to seep through the backing sheet and stick to adjacent sheets, thereby completely obviating the advantage sought by using a non-perforating process to selectively weaken the paper.

While it is undesirable to have such adhesivepenetrable weak-spots in the backing sheet, it is equally undesirable to have tear lines which are supposed to crack open when deliberately flexed by the user but which do not do so because the line is not weak enough. Therefore, it will be understood that a selectively weakened line must be deep enough to allow easy splitting but also must be strong enough so that it will not split when it is not supposed to split (for example, by tearing at split points not subjected to deliberate flexing. Such secondary split lines are often provided on release sheets of the so-called universal-split type ahd which are particularly described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,006,793 to Wheeler.)

In many prior art backing sheets, the extra lines were so weak that the sheet would tear at the extra lines and greatly slow down the stripping of the backing sheet and consequently, delay the label-applying process. The compressed paper lines of the instant invention have a relatively high residual strength when compared to the low resistance to breakage when flexed along a score line. As has been indicated above, this strength is a consequence of the uniformity with which weakening may be achieved by use of the present method and apparatus.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved process for controllably weakening a protective, release'coated backing sheet for use in backing of an adhesive-coated label stock or the like.

Another object of the invention is to provide improved apparatus for selectively weakening paper along linear portions thereof.

Another object of the invention is to provide a superior process for making a release-sheet-backed label display assembly.

A further object of the invention is to provide such apparatus which performs well when applied to resincoated paper surfaces.

Another object of the invention is to provide an improved apparatus for selectively weakening linear section of paper sheet.

Other objects of the invention will be obvious to those skilled in the art on reading the instant application.

The above objects have been substantially achieved by a process utilizing a novel tool having a working edge of a relatively large radius with respect to the paper to be compressed, and simultaneously weakened by use of the tool. The use of such an edge has been found to allow a compressing depth of up to percent or more of the paper thickness without danger of excessively weakening, or cutting through, the paper being processed. The compression of paper caused by use of this tool results in a weakened path which parts easily along a sheet when one bends the sheet along the line of the compressed path. However, the processed sheet also provides a suitable shield against seepage of adhesive. The invention when used with relatively heavy paper, such as clay-coated kraft tag stock of 78 lbs. per ream, does not have any significant tendency to part at embrittled and compressed linear paths along which splitting is required during removal of the backing from an adhesive sheet. This is a consequence of the relative uniformity with which the linear paths can be formed: enough compression can be achieved to give an easysnapping line but the residual tensile strength is great enough to prevent accidental tearing.

The radius of the edge of the embrittling tool of the invention is from about 0.020 inches to 0.100 inches depending on the thickness of the paper. It has been determined that there should be a bearing surface mounted with compression edge to assure maximum ease of control over the line of compression when light paper stock is being processed. In such cases the cutting edge protrudes a distance from the bearing surface of about 75 percent of the papers thickness. By light paper stock is meant paper of about 80 lbs. per ream or heavier and particularly paper of I lbs or more per ream. With heavier paper bearing surfaces are not needed to moderate compression, but they are helpful for carrying traction rings and for moderating the rate of compression.

ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION In this application and accompanying drawings are shown and described a preferred embodiment of the invention. Various alternatives and modifications thereof, are suggested, but it is to be understood that these are not intended to be exhaustive and that other changes and modifications can be made within the scope of the invention. The suggestions herein are selected and included for purposes of illustration in order that others skilled in the art will more fully understand the invention and the principles thereof, and will be able to modify it and embody it in a variety of forms, each as may be best suited in the condition of a particular case.

IN THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a plan view of a segment of a typical backing sheet of the universal-split type" mounted over an adhesive-coated sheet.

FIG. 2 shows a cross-sectioned, somewhat schematic view of the backed adhesive sheet of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a side view of one compression wheel constructed according to the invention.

FIG. 4 is an elevation taken normal to the axial direction of the compression wheel of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 is an elevation of another compression wheel constructed according to the invention and taken normal to the axial direction thereof.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show a particularly advantageous tool formed according to the process of the invention.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, it is seen that an adhesive-sheet assembly 10 comprises an adhesive-bearing sheet 12, a coating of adhesive 14 firmly attached thereto, and an adhesive-backing sheet 16. Backing sheet 16 is only moderately adherent to adhesive 14 and may be conveniently peeled therefrom. Such peeling is facilitated by bending sheet assembly 10 toward the label-bearing side and thereby causing it to crack along a line 18 as shown in FIG. 2. The bending causes cracking along the compressed paper 20 of lines 18. This bending will cause an edge of the sheet 16 to become exposed and readily grippable for pulling the remaining part of 16 from the assembly 10.

As indicated in FIG. 1, a backing sheet normally contains a number of weakened lines 18 so that there will be at least one present on the smallest item likely to be cut from the sheet by a manufacturer. In practice, this means that most users will be peeling backing sheet 16 from items containing a plurality of lines 18, some of which are not intended to be ruptured by that particular user. Their remaining intact allows a quick removal of the backing sheet by the user.

FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a compression wheel 30 particularly useful in embrittling a relatively light backing sheet. This wheel is mounted on an axis 32 and comprises, in addition to a semi-circular compressing edge 34 having a radius R1 of 0.04 inches, a pair of integrally mounted shoulders 36 which provide means to limit the degree of compression along linear portions of a backing-sheet being treated.

FIG. 5 illustrates a compression wheel which has a radius R2 of 0.05 inches. Wheels of such radii do not absolutely require limiting shoulders when used to selectively embrittle backing sheets of 8 mils or more in thickness, although use of such shoulders to moderate compression or to hold traction rings is most often desirable.

It is desirable to operate with 78 lb. per ream paper. It is less troublesome to make universal-split type assemblies with such paper than with paper of a smaller weight basis. Such 78-lb. paper is about 0.004 inches in thickness when clay-coated to provide a suitable surface for receiving a release coating, e.g., silicone coating. With such paper, a radius of about 0.025 inches on the compressing edge of the tool is about optimum.

The process can be run most smoothly, however, when coated tag papers of 7 to 8 mil caliper are used with a scoring wheel of 0.05 mils in radius and it is such a paper that is most advantageous for use in the process of the invention. When such papers are properly compacted, they break with a sharp snap on being bent about 60 to toward the side which was contacted by the scoring wheel. The compressing is advantageously done by applying the scoring tool to the release-coated side of the paper. This tends to be less stressful on the release coating; strain applied from the opposite side from the release coating often ruptures otherwise suitable release coatings. The pressure is such that the paper is weakened to have a tensile strength of between about 5.0 and about 18 lbs per inch when tested on an Instron-type tensile-testing instrument Model No. TM 481, an instrument commonly known to the art and sold by Instron Corporation. Most advantageously, the strength of compression line ranges between about 6 to 12 pounds. And this is less than about 8 to 15% of the tensile strength of the paper before it is embrittled by compression.

The test procedure is as follows:

Sample Size: l-inch wide; 1 inch between clamp-jaws Stain Rate Speed: 1 inch per minute Chart Speed: l0 inches per minute In general, paper should be weakened to less than about 20% of its original strength by the process of in vention.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show a particularly advantageous embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment of the invention, a compression wheel assembly 40 comprises set into a groove 45 on each side of wheel 30, a resilient wheel such as an O-ring 42. The wheels 42 help to assure a relatively uniform compression rate and are of particular value in maintaining traction of the wheel on the paper and thus assuring is continuous rotation. As seen in FIG. 7, they are compressed when engaged with paper sheet 44 against a firm backing support member 50. Normally these wheels are formed of an elastomeric material such as a silicone rubber elastomer, or BUNA-N type of synthetic rubber. An O-ring about 0.103 in thickness is appropriate; and l-I2l49 O-ring is particularly suitable, and may be spaced conveniently about 0.15 inch or so from the compressing wheel itself.

The total width 46 of assembly 40 is about 0.75 inches. Wheels 42 and 30 extend about 0.125 inches outwardly from the main body 48 of the wheel.

Production speeds of well over 200 feet per minute are easily attained using the scoring process of the invention because it does not involve a mechanical engagement with the paper as is required in conventional scoring or abrading processes, and it does not require controlled application of a chemical reagent as is required by use of chemical etchants. Indeed the process is not at all limiting of line speed in most cases, that being more limited by drying times. However, when the process is applied to weakening paper in operations not limited by such factors as drying time, it allows excellent improvements in line speeds while maintaining a relatively more uniform weakening of the paper along the line of compression.

It has been discovered that the most satisfactory procedure to use is to compress the paper being treated by application of compression from the release side. This has the special advantage of eliminating descriptions in the release coating which were noticed to occur with some frequency when the coating was extended by strain caused by the scoring tool applied to the noncoated surface of the release paper. Such descriptions, of course, result in an undesirable sticking of adhesive coated labels to the paper substrate and interfere with the convenience with which the mounted labels can be used.

It has also been found that the rupture of the release paper is more uniformly controllable when the paper is bent toward the grooved side rather than away from it.

It is also to be understood that the following claims are intended to cover all of the generic and specific features of the invention herein described and all statements of the scope of the invention which might be said to fall therebetween.

We claim:

1. A tool for selectively weakening linear paths on cellulosic paper by compaction of the fibers thereof to the point said paper will break along said path on bending, said tool comprising a. a circular, relatively blunt, rotable working edge,

said edge having a minimum radius of at least about 0.02 inches and being the only working edge on said tool b. means for mounting said edge for rotation and a support member for holding said paper against said tool;

c. wherein a pair of round shoulders is integrally mounted with said working edge and recessed from said working edge by from about 0.003 to 0.012 inches and forming means to bear against the paper on each side of a said linear path;

and said tool comprising distortable resilient elastomeric rings mounted on saidxshoulders, and. wherein said recessed position of said shoulders is provided at least in part by distortion of said rings on being compressed against the surface of the said paper.

p 3, 7Q'3 Dated August 6, 197 1 Jerry L. Keck ac Jemee Robert Rowley Inventor(s) It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below;

Column 1,- line 7 The U.S. Patent 3,7l9,58 L"-should Signed and sealed this 28th day of January 1975..

(SEAL) Attest McCOY M. GIBSON JR. c. MARSHALI; DANN Attesting Officer Commissioner of Patents F ORM PO-l Q50 (10-69)

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1859513 *Mar 29, 1929May 24, 1932United Shoe Machinery CorpWork locating and guiding device
US2019499 *Nov 23, 1933Nov 5, 1935American Can CoScoring machine
US3157398 *Oct 19, 1961Nov 17, 1964Dick Co AbScoring mechanism
US3318206 *Oct 18, 1966May 9, 1967Koppers Co IncUnitized rotary scorer
US3654842 *Oct 13, 1969Apr 11, 1972Int Paper CoMethod of making side seam sealed container
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5309792 *Jul 1, 1993May 10, 1994Gerhardt International A/SDevice for cutting a sheet material and process for its manufacture
US5398580 *Feb 8, 1994Mar 21, 1995Gerhardt International A/SDevice for cutting a sheet material
US7563220 *Dec 12, 2007Jul 21, 2009Tech-Ni-Fold Ltd.Drum for a creasing device
US7670275May 16, 2007Mar 2, 2010Bindery Parts Source, Inc.Paper scoring system
US7686754May 24, 2007Mar 30, 2010Tech-Ni-Fold LtdDrum for a creasing device
US7775960Oct 14, 2009Aug 17, 2010Tech-Ni-Fold LtdDrum for a creasing device
US20070243988 *May 24, 2007Oct 18, 2007Tech-Ni-Fold Ltd.Drum for a creasing device
US20080090712 *Dec 12, 2007Apr 17, 2008Tech-Ni-Fold Ltd.Drum For A Creasing Device
US20080287276 *May 16, 2007Nov 20, 2008Schaack Dennis RPaper scoring system
US20090298660 *Aug 13, 2009Dec 3, 2009Schaack Dennis RPaper Scoring System
US20100035741 *Oct 14, 2009Feb 11, 2010Tech-ni-Fold, Ltd.Drum For A Creasing Device
US20100152011 *Mar 2, 2010Jun 17, 2010Schaack Dennis RPaper Scoring System
US20150119221 *Oct 25, 2013Apr 30, 2015Gyre Innovations LpApparatus and method for forming a bending crease in corrugated paperboard
EP0534481A1 *Sep 25, 1992Mar 31, 1993Gerhardt International A/SApparatus for cutting, slitting, perforating or scoring sheets and method for producing the same
U.S. Classification493/396
International ClassificationG09F3/02, B26D3/08
Cooperative ClassificationB26D3/085, G09F3/0286, C09J2483/005
European ClassificationG09F3/02B, B26D3/08B
Legal Events
Jun 30, 1987AS02Assignment of assignor's interest
Effective date: 19861212
Jun 30, 1987ASAssignment
Effective date: 19861212