Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3827457 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 6, 1974
Filing dateJun 22, 1973
Priority dateJun 22, 1973
Publication numberUS 3827457 A, US 3827457A, US-A-3827457, US3827457 A, US3827457A
InventorsD Brown, N Vutz
Original AssigneeWestinghouse Air Brake Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Fluid pressure system for converting digital signals to analog signals
US 3827457 A
A fluid pressure system for converting a digital pressure signal into an analog pressure by control of fluid pressure passing through at least a pair of restrictors in series and by monitoring the pressure between the two restrictors each one of which may be characterized by a subsonic or sonic flow rate therethrough so as to produce any combination of such flow rates therebetween, depending upon the input pressure and the cross-sectional area and geometric configuration of said restrictors.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 1191 Vutz et a1. Aug. 6, 1974 [5 FLUID PRESSURE SYSTEM FOR 3,072,146 1/1963 Gizeski 137/599 x CONVERTING DIGITAL SIGNALS o 3,081,942 3/1963 MaClay 91/31 3,726,296 4/1973 Fr1ed1and et a1 137/599 x ANALOG SIGNALS Inventors: Norman Vutz, Radnor; Donald Brown, Monroeville, both of Pa.

Assignee: Westinghouse Air Brake Company.

Wilmerding, Pa.

Filed: June 22, 1973 Appl. No.: 372,849

US. Cl. 137/599 Int. Cl G05d 7/03, Fl5c 3/00 Field of Search 137/561, 599, 599.1, 601;

91/31; 235/200 R, 201 ME References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 1/1941 Schmohl et al. 137/599 Primary Examiner-William R. Cline Attorney, Agent, or FirmRa1ph W. Mclntire, Jr.

[5 7] ABSTRACT A fluid pressure system for converting a digital pressure signal into an analog pressure by control of fluid pressure passing through at least a pair of restrictors in series and by monitoring the pressure between the two restrictors each one of which may be characterized by a subsonic or sonic flow rate therethrough so as to produce any combination of such flow rates therebetween, depending upon the input pressure and the cross-sectional area and geometric configuration of said restrictors.

4 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures PATENTEDAUI; EISH v 3,827,457

- ANALOG PRESSURE CONSTANT PRESSURE TO ATMOSPHERE SUPPLY 3 I 4 2T 5 ANALOG PRESSURE DOWNSTREAM R E S RQIEQ R I RESTRICTOR CONSTANT A 5 PRESSURE T v 1 v TO-ATMOSPHERE SUPPLY 3 l 7% v 4 8 UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM VALVE VALVE BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In fluid pressure operable systems wherein valve devices are employed for effecting supply of control pressure at varying degrees to other fluid pressure operable devices, such as in a railway train brake system, for example, wherein a manually operable engineers brake valve is operable to a plurality of positions for effecting supply of control fluid, at a preselected degree, to the relay portion of the brake control valve, the degree of such control pressure thus delivered to the brake control valve should be highly accurate in order to avoid overbraking or underbraking of the train. The engineers brake valve device noramlly includes a manually operable handle which the operator moves to a selected position, according to his experience and judgment, that will effect delivery of control pressure at the desired degree. Although the operators experience normally permits him to operate the brake valve with a high degree of accuracy in effecting delivery of control pressure at the desired degree, there is no positive assurance that such will occur with each operation, especially in the case of an operator with little experience.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The object of the present invention, therefore, is to provide apparatus for supplying control fluid at a precise, measured pressure, said apparatus being characterized in that it may be operated without the necessity of judgment in the part of the operator in positioning an operating handle.

Basically, the invention comprises a plurality of control pressure supply restrictors, either of identical flow rate capacities or of various flow rate capacities, connected in parallel relation to each other between an upstream source of control fluid at a contant preselected pressure and a downstream atmospheric restrictor. Respective individually operable cut-off valve devices, which may be of the type operated manually or of the type operated by remote controlled power means, are connected to the downstram side of each of the supply restrictors in interposed relation between each of said supply restrictors so that one or more of said supply restrictors may be cut out or cut in, as desired, to produce the desired control pressure which is tapped off between said atmospheric restrictor and a common conduit connected to all of said supply restrictors and leading to the device to be supplied with such control pressure. A cut-off valve similar to those above described may be connected to the downstream or outlet side of the atmospheric restrictor for further control of the pressure tapped off via the common conduit for the device to be controlled thereby. The apparatus may be, constructed in the form of a manifold in which the several cut-off valves may be disposed and in which the several restrictors may be machined according to specified dimensions and cross-sectional configuration.

In the drawing, FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic of the basic principle of operation of the invention; FIG. 2 is also a diagrammatic of a further development of the basic illustration shown in FIG. 1; and'FIG. 3 is a sectional view of a digitial to analog pressure converter device embodying the invention. A

DESCRIPTION AND OPERATION For purposes of illustrating the basic principle of the invention, FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows an upstream restrictor or choke member I connected in series to a downstream restrictor or choke member 2 by means of conduits 3, 4 and 5. In this case, fluid at a constant preselected pressure, flowing in the direction indicated by the arrows, is supplied to conduit 3 and flows through restrictor 1, through conduit 4, and through restrictor 5 to atmosphere. A tap-off conduit 6 is connected to conduit 4 between the two restrictors 1 and 2. Thus the volume between restrictors I and 2, as tapped by conduit 6, reflects an analog pressure resulting from the digital pressure supplied at conduit 3. By varying the flow areas of the upstream and downstream restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, it is possible to obtain various combinations of sonic/subsonic flow rates through the restrictors.

Depending upon the cross-sectional dimension and the effective pressure at the source, restrictors may be classified as sonic or subsonic.

If the restrictor is subsonic, the flow rate thereof depends upon the square root of the pressure differential across the restrictor. This condition may be represented by the formula R =C V AP, where R is the flow rate of the restrictor, C is a constant determined by the geometric cross-sectional configuration of the restrictor, and AP is the pressure differential across the restrictor. The pressure output, or P of a subsonic restrictor is always greater than one half the pressure input, or P or expressed mathematically, P, P,/2.

If the restrictor is sonic, the flow rate thereof depends on the upstream pressure only, assuming the temperature to be constant. This condition may be represented by the formula R kP, where R is the flow rate, k is a constant determined by the physical characteristics of the restrictor (such as the dimensions, geometric configuration, surface conditions, the effects of temperature, etc.), and P is the pressure input. The pressure output, or P of a sonic restrictor is always less than one half the pressure input, or P,, or expressed mathematically, P,, P,/2.

It should be noted, however, that even though the respective values of both constants C and k, as above set forth, depend on corresponding physical features of the restrictors, in the case where several restrictors having identical physical features are involved, the respective values of the constants C and k will not necessarily be the same but will differ between sonic and subsonic flow rate conditions.

The subject matter and the related formulae contained in the three paragraphs immediately preceding may be confirmed by referenceto Vol. 73, pages 639 through 647 of the Transactions of ASME, 1951, under the title of Discharge Coefficients of Small'Diameter Orifices and Nozzles by H. P. Grace & C. E. Lapple.

By interposing an on-off upstream valve device 7 and an on-ofi' downstream valve device 8 in pipes 4 and 5 downstream of restrictors l and 2, respectively, as shown in FIG. 2, digital control is obtained. If the downstream valve device 8 is shut off, an analog pressure at one limit, that is at a pressure equal to the constant source pressure in pipe 3 is produced in the tapoff pipe 6. The analog pressure in pipe 6 may be read on a pressuregauge 9 connected thereto. By closing upstream valve 7 and opening downstream valve 8,

flow through restrictor l is stopped and the volume comprising pipes 4 and 6 is vented via restrictor 2 to produce an analog pressure at a second limit equal to atmosphere. By opening both valves 7 and 8 an analog pressure between the two limits is obtained, the value of such analog pressure thus obtained being dependent upon the relationship between the flow areas of the upstream and downstream restrictors 1 and 2 as well as the respective upstream pressure of each of said restric tors to determine the sonic/subsonic combination produced. The pressure limits obtainable for the four sonic/subsonic combinations possible with two restrictors in series are as follows:

TYPE OF FLOW THROUGH THE RESTRICTORS bodying the invention, such a device may be like the one shown in FIG. 3.

As shown in FIG. 3, the pilot valve device may comprise a casing having a restrictor section 10 and a valve section 11, the two sections being sealingly joined by any suitable means not shown. The restrictor section 10 has disposed therein a plurality or preselected number of upstream restrictors R R R etc. having the input ends thereof connected in parallel relation via a passageway 12 to a common source of constant pressure, in this case a feed pipe 13 of the brake system.

The output ends of the restrictors R R R etc. are connected to respective inlet ends of upstream flow LIMITS OF ANALOG PRESSURE UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM LOWEST HIGHEST RESTRlCTOR RESTRICTOR (a) Suhsonic Subsonic 1 atmosphere P,, P, ('7) Sonic Subsonic l atmosphere P,, P,/2 (c) Subsonic Sonic 2 atmospheres P,, P, (d) Sonic Sonic 2 atmospheres P,, P,/2

In considering combination (a), for example, in which both the upstream restrictor 1 and the downstream restrictor 2 are subsonic, it should be apparent that P, could be adjusted downwardly to approach one atmosphere (but not actually reduced to one atmosphere, otherwise there would be no flow). For purposes of convenience, however, this P will be called one atmosphere. If the constriction of downstream restrictor 2 is reduced to a point just short of that point at which anincrease of P, from one atmosphere up to a P, just short of producing a sonic flow through the upstream restrictor 1, then the highest possible P, for a subsonic/subsonic combination of the restrictors 1 and 2, respectively, would approach P since, as above noted, P,, P,/2. For convenience, therefore, it is said that the highest limit of output or P in the subsonic/- subsonic combination is input pressure or P ln considering combination (b), that is when upstream restrictor l is sonic and downstream restrictor 2 is subsonic, the lowest possible P, can be close to one atmosphere (that is, just above one atmosphere, as above discussed). P, can then be increased from one atmosphere up to a pressure just short of causing the downstream restrictor 2 to go into a sonic flow rate. In this case, since the pressure leaving the upstream restrictor l, which is sonic, must be less than P,-/2, the upper limit of analog pressure at gauge 9 can only approach P /2.

By applying similar logic to cases (c) and (d) in the above table, one skilled in the art can readily understand how the lower and upper analog pressure limits are derived for each case.

The principles relating to restrictors, as above described, may be applied to a device, which may be called a pilot device, used in providing a control pressure to a second operating or control device. If the characteristic of the control device is such as to require a wide range of analog control pressures, it would not be practical to try to provide said wide range of control pressure by varying the respective flow areas of the two restrictors 1 and 2. If, for example, it is desired to replace an engineers brake valve in a railway brake system with a more compact pilot valve device of equivalent versility and of the type herein described and emcontrol valve devices V V V etc. of the open-closed type disposed in valve section 11, said valve devices having the outlet ends thereof connected in parallel relation via a passageway 14 to a downstream restrictor 15 which, in turn, is connected serially to the inlet of a downstream flow control valve device 16, both said downstream restrictor and downstream valve device also being disposed in valve section 11. The outlet side of downstream valve device 16 is connected to a pipe 18 leading to a device such as the relay valve portion (not shown) of the brake control valve device (not shown).

If all the parallel connected upstream restrictors R R R etc. are of identical flow area, then the analog pressure delivered via pipe 18 may be progressively increased by sequentially opening the appropriate upstream control valves V V V etc. This simulates varying the flow area of a single restrictor in a step wise fashion to produce the desired analog pressure between the upstream and downstream restrictors, said analog pressure being fed via pipe 18 to the relay valve of the brake control valve, which in turn, as is well known to those skilled in the art, controls brake pipe pressure for applying or releasing the train brakes.

Since discrete steps of brake pipe pressure control are effected in the manner above described, a binary digital method of controlling operation of the valves V,, V V etc. would possibly provide a very practical means of approaching a pure analog control pressure which is essential in obtaining smooth variations of brake pipe pressure control. The number of pressure levels obtainable with the pilot valve device shown in FIG. 3 is 2"", where n indicates the number of upstream restrictors. The respective values of the pressure increments comprising a pressure level is determined by the respective restrictor sizes and the valves opened for effecting the resultant upstream to downstream flow range.

It should be apparent that the upstream restrictors R R R etc., as well as the downstream restrictor 15, do not have to be of identical dimension. The dimensions and the number of the several restrictors may vary according to the specifications of the application of the invention. It should also be noted, however, that the total flow area resulting from the restrictor or combination of restrictors, as effected by the binary control logic, should be such as to produce pressure steps of fairly close values so as to allow a smooth transition from one pressure level to the next.

Control of the upstream valves V V V etc. may be effected in the desired binary fashion by any suitable well known manual, electrical, or fluid pressure means. An electrical valve controller 19 connected by multiple-wire conductors 20 and 21 to the several valve devices V V V etc., and incorporating a binary code system, for example, is represented symbolically in the drawing, it being considered that such control means are so well known in the art that a detailed description thereof is not deemed essential to an understanding of the invention. The controller 19 is provided with a control panel 22 which the operator uses in selecting any combination of the valves V V V etc. that he desires to operate in effecting the described analog control pressure.

Having now described the invention, what we claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent, is:

l. A control pressure pilot valve device for converting a digital pressure to an analog control pressure transmitted to a control device for operation thereof, said pilot valve device comprising:

a. at least two upstream restrictors of preselected flow capacity and each having the upstream side thereof connected to first passage means via which fluid at a constant pressure may be supplied concurrently to said upstream restrictors;

b. respective upstream valve devices each having one end connected to respective opposite sides of said upstream restrictors and each having the opposite end connected to second passage means,

c. said upstream valve devices being selectively operable, either singly or in any combination thereof, to respective open positions, in which the respective upstream restrictor connected thereto is communicated with said second passage means, and to respective closed positions in which the said respective upstream restrictor is cutoff from said second passage means, said second passage means being communicable with the control device for transmitting thereto analog control pressure at a degree effected by the combination of opened and closed positions of the upstream valve devices;

. a downstream restrictor having one end connected to said second passage means; and

a downstream valve device having one side connected to the other end of said downstream restrictor, the other side of said downstream valve device being open to atmosphere, said downstream valve device being operable to an open position, in which said second passage means is opened to atmosphere, and being operable to a closed position, in which said second passage means is cut off from atmosphere, for further controlling the degree of analog pressure prevailing in the second passage means.

2. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the dimensions of the flow area of one or more of said upstream restrictors are different from the others.

3. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 2, further characterized by operators control means for effecting selective operation of said upstream and downstream valve devices.

4. A control pressure pilot valve device, as set forth in claim 3, wherein said operators control means comprises an electrical controller incorporating a binary code system and including a control panel for selecting the desired code and consequent combination of valve operation.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2229903 *Feb 4, 1939Jan 28, 1941Arthur L ParkerMetering valve
US3072146 *Sep 24, 1959Jan 8, 1963Gizeski TerrenceDigital regulator valve
US3081942 *Sep 18, 1961Mar 19, 1963IbmDigital-to-analog control system
US3726296 *Aug 9, 1971Apr 10, 1973Process SystemsFluidic control system and method for calibrating same
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3905394 *Apr 12, 1974Sep 16, 1975Digital Dynamics IncFlow control system
US4191215 *May 19, 1978Mar 4, 1980Bodenseewerk Perkin-Elmer & Co., GmbhDigital fluid flow rate controller
US4256100 *Feb 12, 1979Mar 17, 1981Rule Medical Instruments, Inc.Flow control equipment
US4276904 *Sep 1, 1976Jul 7, 1981The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyAdjustable flow rate controller for polymer solutions
US4498496 *Jul 16, 1982Feb 12, 1985Fiat Auto S.P.A.Mixing of gaseous substances
US4577658 *Jun 29, 1984Mar 25, 1986Michel BosteelsCalibrated fluid flow control device
US4842017 *Apr 4, 1988Jun 27, 1989Rolls-Royce PlcFluid flow control apparatus
US4945980 *Sep 7, 1989Aug 7, 1990Nec CorporationCooling unit
US4975766 *Aug 23, 1989Dec 4, 1990Nec CorporationStructure for temperature detection in a package
US5014777 *Sep 19, 1989May 14, 1991Nec CorporationCooling structure
US5023695 *May 8, 1989Jun 11, 1991Nec CorporationFlat cooling structure of integrated circuit
US5036384 *Apr 30, 1990Jul 30, 1991Nec CorporationCooling system for IC package
US5893390 *Oct 3, 1997Apr 13, 1999Texas Instruments IncorporatedFlow controller
US5927325 *Oct 25, 1996Jul 27, 1999Inpod, Inc.Microelectromechanical machined array valve
US6240944 *Sep 23, 1999Jun 5, 2001Honeywell International Inc.Addressable valve arrays for proportional pressure or flow control
US7000330Jul 2, 2003Feb 21, 2006Honeywell International Inc.Method and apparatus for receiving a removable media member
US7293581 *Nov 1, 2006Nov 13, 2007Cytonome, Inc.Latching micro-regulator
US20110272051 *Jan 12, 2010Nov 10, 2011Flsmidth A/SDamper Arrangement
US20130220451 *Feb 8, 2013Aug 29, 2013Fujikin IncorporatedFlow rate range variable type flow rate control apparatus
WO1980001646A1 *Jan 31, 1980Aug 21, 1980Rule IndustriesFlow control equipment
WO2001021962A1 *Sep 22, 2000Mar 29, 2001Honeywell IncAddressable valve arrays for proportional pressure or flow control
U.S. Classification137/599.7
International ClassificationF15C4/00, B60T13/66, F15B5/00, F15C1/00, G05D16/00, F15B11/042
Cooperative ClassificationF15B2211/455, F15B11/0426, B60T13/665, F15B2211/20538, F15B2211/40592, F15B2211/40507, F15B2211/426, F15C1/00, F15B2211/40515
European ClassificationF15C1/00, B60T13/66C, F15B11/042C
Legal Events
Mar 25, 1991ASAssignment
Effective date: 19900307
May 3, 1990ASAssignment
Effective date: 19900309
Mar 14, 1990ASAssignment
Effective date: 19900309
Dec 11, 1989ASAssignment
Effective date: 19781219
Dec 11, 1989AS03Merger
Effective date: 19781219
Jun 28, 1988ASAssignment
Effective date: 19880624