Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3838646 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 1, 1974
Filing dateNov 1, 1972
Priority dateNov 1, 1972
Also published asCA1001137A1
Publication numberUS 3838646 A, US 3838646A, US-A-3838646, US3838646 A, US3838646A
InventorsSmith W, Turner D
Original AssigneeGen Signal Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Noise suppression system for car retarders
US 3838646 A
Abstract
A noise suppression system for a railway classification yard is disclosed. An oil-in-water emulsion consisting essentially of one part of oil and ten parts of water is sprayed against the rail car wheels as they enter the master retarder. Additional spray means are provided at the group retarders for spraying additional emulsion against the wheels of heavily loaded cars as they enter the group retarders. The oil-in-water emulsion eliminates the squealing of the car retarders with only a minor reduction in braking efficiency.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent [1 1 Smith et a1.

[451 Oct. 1, 1974 NOISE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FOR CAR RETARDERS [75] Inventors: Willis R. Smith; Daniel E. Turner,

both of Rochester, NY.

[73] Assignee: General Signal Corporation,

Rochester, NY.

22 Filed: Nov. 1,1972

21 App1.No.: 302,701

OTHER PUBLICATIONS Conway Yard by Pennsylvania R.R., date 4/1/58.

GROUP RETARDERS SPRAY PUMP 24 CONTROL SPRAY-PUMP .25; CONTROL SPRAY PUMP CONTROL BN Studies Retarder Noise Abatement by Burlington Northern in 11/72, issue of Railway System Controls, pp. 14-17, 20.

Primary Examiner- Robert .l. Spar Assistant Examiner-Lawrence J. Oresky Attorney, Agent, or FirmMilton E. Kleinman; George Vande Sande; Harold S. Wynn [57] ABSTRACT A noise suppression system for a railway classification yard is disclosed. An oil-in-water emulsion consisting essentially of one part of oil and ten parts of water is sprayed against the rail car wheels as they enter the master retarder. Additional spray means are provided at the group retarders for spraying additional emulsion against the wheels of heavily loaded cars as they enter the group retarders. The oil-in-water emulsion eliminates the squealing of the car retarders with only a minor reduction in braking efficiency.

13 Claims, 8 Drawing Figures WEIGHT DETECTOR MASTER RETARDER CONTROLLER PATENTED m 1 74 4 $838546 SHEH 205 3 j.

OJ K 3 E a s E 1N no a I] a W. Q a gin l Mm 1 z =5 w 5: :5 ELF Fw v W K N r J 5 L M P 3- NM 1 I mm As dim a E M U a H N mm -26 a 3 m: t% a mi n: Q Kg m PATENIEUOET 1:214

REFRACTOMETER 4TO STRAGE TANKS no. a

NOISE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM FOR CAR RETARDERS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION This invention relates to a noise suppression system for use in a railway classification yard. Specifically, it eliminates the squeal caused by metal to metal contact when the brake shoes of the master and group retarders exert a braking action against the wheels of the incoming railway cars.

Car retarders are employed in railway classification yards in conjunction with a hump over which a string of cars is pushed. The cars are then individually, or in cuts, allowed to accelerate down the hump and through the appropriate switching networks to their ultimate destination. As the cars accelerate down the hump, it is necessary to keep the speed of travel within certain predetermined levels in accordance with their rolling resistance, distance to be travelled before coupling, and various other factors.

Since light cars generally have the greatest rolling resistance and thus must be given thegreatest accelera tion to reach the most distant destination in the classification yard, the hump is built high enough to cause light cars to reach sufficient speed to carry them to the furthest point. Car retarders are then added to reduce the speed of the heavier cars. The first retarder is employed on the main track downstream of the hump but before the track divides into the classification branches. This main retarder is known as the master car retarder, and the retarders that are placed on the individual branch lines are known as group retarders.

Each of these retarders employ a pair of elongated brake shoes on either side of each rail which come together to grip the wheels of the rail car and cause a partial braking of the cars movement. The steel-on-steel friction generated by the car retarder at the substantial loads imposed by the retarder results in a loud and offensive squeal each time the retarder engages a railway car. The present invention is particularly adapted to eliminate the squeal with only a minimal amount of reduction in braking efficiency. 4

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION It is an object of the present invention to provide a noise suppression system which will eliminate the squeal of a railway car retarder by spraying the wheels of the railway car with an oil-in-water emulsion as the car passes throughthe retarder. The emulsion consists essentially of one part of lubricating oil to ten parts of water and provides sufficient lubrication to eliminate the chatter or vibration which results in the squealing noise without substantially impairing the braking efficiency of the car retarder. In actual practice, the squeal is eliminated with only a 6 percent reduction in braking efficiency.

A plurality of spray means is mounted immediately adjacent each of the braking shoes in the master retarder to spray the oil-in-water emulsion against the wheels of the railway car as it passes through the master retarder. A cardetector means energizes and deenergizes the spray means for the master retarders. The group retarder spray means are activated when an exceptionally heavy car is cut through one of the group retarders. In actual practice, it has been found advantageous to spray the wheels of each car loaded in excess of 80 tons. Although the group retarders are also used on empty cars and lighter cars, it has been found that the oil-in-vvater emulsion deposited by the master retarder is sufficient lubrication for the group retarder.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a plan view of a portion of a railway classification yard illustrating a master retarder and three group retarders with the appropriate controls for each;

FIG. 2 is a plan view of a car retarder; FIG. 3 is an elevation view of a car retarder illustrating the retarder and a sump formed below the retarder;

FIG. 4 is a detailed plan view of a portion of a car retarder illustrating the spray means employed in the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a car retarder taken along section line 5 5 of FIG. 4;

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of a car retarder taken along section line 6 6 in FIG. 4;

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional elevation view of the storage means utilized in the present invention; and

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional elevation view of the mixing means used to mix the oil-in-water emulsion in the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT against the wheels of a rail car as it passes through the retarder. The master control for the noise suppression system is controller 19 which is connected to car detectors 20 and 21 and which energizes the spray pump 22 for the master retarder when the car detector 21 senses an incoming freight car or cut of freight cars.

As was pointed out previously, it is intended that every car be sprayed in the master retarder, but that only those cars in excess of eighty tons be sprayed in the. group retarder. It has been found the residual lubrication remaining after the spraying operation in the master retarder is sufficient to prevent excessive noise for light cars when they pass through the group retarder. It is desirable, however, to energize the spray means for those exceptionally heavy cars.

A weight detector 23 is placed on the main track to identify those cars which are in excess of eighty tons.

This is coordinated through the controller 19, and the controller for the main rail classification yard to energize the appropriate spray pump control for the group retarders l6, l7, and 18. These spray pump controls 24, 25 and 26 are also equipped with car detectors to detennine the presence of a rail car at the group retarder. The spray pump control 24 receives signals not only from the weight detector 23 and the main controller 19, but also from the car detectors 27 and 28. The spray pump control 24 will energize group retarder 16 if positive or and signals are received from both the weight detector and the controller 19. Similarly, spray. pump control is equipped with car detectors 29 and 30 while spray pump control 26 is equipped with car detectors 31 and 32.The car detectors 28, 30 and 32 deenergize the spray pumps as the car or cut of cars pass through the retarder.

A fluid mixing and handling system is provided to supply an oil-in-water emulsion consisting essentially of a lubricating oil and water. The fluid mixing system is indicated generally at 33 in FIG. 1 and, as will be hereinafter later described with reference to FIG. 8, includes a fluid handling and mixing means. Conduits 34 and 35 lead to the master retarder and the group retarders and provide a fresh emulsion consisting essentially of 1 part of lubricating oil to 10 parts of water. Conduit 34 leads to pump 36 which continually fills a storage means 37. The pump 22 is energized by a signal from the car detector 21 and draws from the storage means 37. The emulsion is then sprayed against the wheels of the rail car as will be hereinafter later, described and the surplus drains into a sump 38 which will be hereinafter. later described. The sump drains through conduit 39 to the group retarder 17. Each of the group retarders 16, 17 and 18 are also equipped with concrete sump basins to collectthe excess emulsion after it has been sprayed against the railway car wheels. The sump basins are connected to drain line 40 which returns the used emulsion back to the mixing and storage means 33. A positive assist is added by means of pump 41.

The outlet supply conduit 35 leads to the group retarders 16, 17 and 18 and is pumped to intermediate storage tanks42, 43 and 44 by means of pumps 45, 46 and 47. The pumps 48, 49 and 50 are energized by means of spray pump controls 24, 25, and 26 and draw from the intermediate storage tanks 42, 43 and 44 when the proper combination of signals has been received by the spray pump controllers.

The spray means used to spray the oil-in-water emul sion against a railway car wheels is illustrated in FIGS. 4, 5 and 6. FIG. 4 is a plan view of one section of a car retarder equipped with a spray means. FIG. 5 is a crosssectional view taken along section line 5-5 in FIG. 4. FIG. 6 is a sectional view taken along section line-6-6 in FIG. 4. As will be noted from a brief examination of FIGS. 3 and 4, each of the car retarders is equipped with a plurality of sections and shoes. One such section or shoe is illustrated in FIG. 4. The car retarder comprises a pair of elongated brake shoes 50 and 51 mounted on either side of a railway car rail. The rails are supported by means of beams 52 and 53. Each of the beams is adapted to move the brake shoes 50and 51 into and out of engagement with a railway car wheel as illustrated in FIG. 5. The actuating mechanisms for means 52 and 53 are well-known in the art and will not be further described. Each of the means 52 and 53 define a load bearing flange 54 and 55 which extends the entire length of the beam and provides a mounting surface for the brake shoes 50 and 51. This flange is reinforced by a plurality of perpendicularly aligned and equally spaced support ribs 56-62. The ribs are joined together by means of a web 63 which also extends the length of the support beam 52. The support beam 53 also defines a plurality of ribs 64-70 and a longitudinally extending web 71.

The spray means comprises a plurality of nozzles mounted on either side of the rail for spraying the oilin-water emulsion against the rail car wheel as illustrated in FIG. 5. In the preferred embodiment, one-half inch pipes 72 and 73 are mounted on either side of the rail by means of a plurality of spring clips. 74 and 75 which extend over the pipe 73 and down through an opening 76 defined in the webs of the beams 52 and 53 to clamp said pipes against said beams. The pipe itself rests upon the upstanding ribs 56-62 of beam 52. The resilient nature of clamps 74 and 7S ensures that the pipes 72 and 73 are held securely in place.

Each of the pipes 72 and 73 is equipped with a plurality of spray nozzles. These spray nozzles 77-83 for pipe 72 and nozzles 84-90 for pipe 73 are aligned to provide a continuous bath of oil-in-water emulsion on either side of the rail 91. The diverging nature of the sprays, and the curved portions 720 and 73a provide angled sprays which will thoroughly wet both the flange 92 and the rim 93 of the rail car wheel. The curved portions 72a and 73a also ensure the space between the individual retarder sections is covered. Since the brake shoes are brought to bear against the rim on one side and the flange on the other, itis necessary that both surfaces receive the proper amount of lubrication. The l:l0 ratio or mixture of oil and water has been found to provide the proper degree or amountof lubrication when the rail car wheels are thoroughly wetted with the emulsion.

FIGS. 2 and 3 are diagrammatic views of the complete retarder with some of the detail omitted for purposes of clarity. FIG. 2 illustrates a plurality of elongated braking shoes 101-120 mounted on either side of each rail 121 and 122. Each of these braking shoes is supported by the respective support or retarder beam 101a-120a. The beams in turn support spray pipes 121-140 which are secured to the beams in the manner illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6. The pipes are connected together by means of 1 rubber hose connectors 121a-140a. These connector hoses provide. the requisite flexibility for the spray pipes since each section is individually operated. They also provide for the relative expansion between the various members due to extreme temperature variation. The spray pipes 121-140 are connected to the fluid supply system by means of manifold. 141 which extends perpendicularly .to the tracks 121 and 122 and intersects the spray pipes 121-140 at a convenient midpoint. The midpoint is selected to minimize the problems associated with pressure drop across the respective lengths of piping 121-140. Each of theterminal ends of spray pipes 121-124 and 137-140 is equipped with caps to seal the ends of the spray pipes and to prevent the discharge of emulsion therefrom.

The retarder illustrated in FIG. 2 is illustrated in elevation view in FIG. 3. As indicated previously, the retarders are generally placed on the slant of a hump to assistin regulating the speed of a railway car after it passes over the hump and is routed to its preselected destination. The individual retarder beams. l04a-l20a are supported'by a plurality. of wooden railway cross ties 142-1150.- These cross ties are in turn supported by a concrete basin or sumpillustrated generally by numeral 151. This sump provides a collection point for the excess emulsion sprayed against the car wheels as they pass through the retarder. As was previously described in FIG. 1, the emulsion 152 collected in the lower portion of the sump is routed back to the mixing and storage means 33 by means of drain pipes 39 and 40 and pump 41.

The fluid mixing and handling system for supplying the oil-in-water emulsion is illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8. FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional and elevation view of the storage tank provided at each of the retarders. FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional and elevational'view of the mixing means for preparing the oil-in-water emulsion.

As illustrated in FIG. 8, the mixing means comprises a water inlet 201, an oil inlet 202, and a discharge outlet 203 for discharging the oil-in-water emulsion. The tank 204 is sized to accomodate the total volume of all the retarder storage tanks. The incoming solution from conduit 40 is first filtered by filter means 205 and then pumped by means of pump 206 into the mixing tank 204. This pump is actuated whenever the liquid level in the mixing tank drops below a certain predetermined level. This predetermined level is established by the position or placement of the detector 207 mounted in the wall of the mixing tank 204. When pump 206 is activated, it drains the emulsion from each of the retarder sumps and recycles the filtered emulsion for reuse in the system. In the preferred embodiment, a large percentage of the solution is recovered and recycled for reuse in the system. In the event there is no solution available in the retarder sumps to fill the mixing tank 204, the mixing controller 208 will open the water control valve 209 and allow a predetermined quantity of water to be admitted to the mixing tank 204.

A second detector 210 is placed within the mixing tank 204 to determine the level where the maximum addition of soluble oil will fill the tank if the solution is pure water. When detector 210 has indicated that the requisite amount of water has been supplied to the mixing tank 204, it will close valve 209 and energize the refractometer 211 to analyze the solution 212 in the mix ing tank 204. At the same time, the mixing means 213 will be energized by drive means 214 to thoroughly mix the existing emulsion with the incoming water. After a suitable time delay, the refractometer will analyze the percentage of oil and water and provide a representational signal to the master controller 208. The master controller 208 will then open the lubricant control valve 215 to allow the proper amount of oil-to enter the mixing tank 204. Detector 216 senses the maximum quantity of emulsion desired in the mixing tank 204. It

also operates as a high limit or upper limit control in the event of failure of one of the other components.

The automatic analysis of the emulsion 212 is also necessary since substantial amounts of rain water will be collected in the sump basins 151 and the mixture pumped from the retarder sumps may have a vastly altered oil to water mixture ratio. In the event a substantial amount of fresh water has been added to the system, pump 206 will fill the mixing tank to the level indicated by detector 210. At that time, the mixture will be analyzed by refractometer 211 and if additional oil is needed to bring the mixture to the proper ratio, valve 215 will be open, and the appropriate amount of oil will be added to the solution. Although the emulsion is extremely stable, it may be desirable to have the mixing means 213 continuously rotating within the tank 204. This would ensure that the lubricant and oil do not separate. The solution is drawn from the mixing tank 204 to each of the retarder storage tanks by means of pumps 36, 45, 46 and 47. The storage tank for retarder 12 is illustrated in FIG. 7 wherein pump 36 draws the mixture from the mixing tank to the storage tank 37. A pair of liquid level indicators 217 and 218 provide low level and upper level limit indicators for the amount of solution stored in tank 37. When the amount of solution has dropped below the level predetermined by level indicator 217, the control means 219 energizes pump 36 and withdraws the appropriate amount of solution from tank 204 to fill the local storage tank 37.

When the level of the solution reaches the level indicated by level indicator 218, pump 36 is deenergized. The solution is withdrawn from storage tank 37 through conduit 220 by means of pump 22. Pump 22 is activated by controller 19 whenever the car detector 21 senses a railway car entering the master retarder. After the car has left the retarder, pump 22 is deenergized by the car detector 20.

The emulsion provided by the fluid mixing and handling system is an oil-in-water'solution consisting essentially of a lubricating oil and water. It has been found that a mixture of Texaco type 1609, class 38 soluble heavy duty oil, mixed ten parts of water to one part of oil will eliminate the noise and squeal of the normal car retarder but will only reduce the braking efficiency by approximately 6 percent.

In a first test of the retarder noise suppression system, a mixture of 20 parts of water to 1 part of soluble oil was used with only partial abatement of the noise. Of ten cars that passed through the retarder, two generated substantial noise when the retarders were actuated.

In a second test of the solution, that being 10 parts of water for 1 part of oil, all the cars passed through the retarder without any excessive noise or squealing and the effective retardation was diminished by only 6 percent.

v In a third test, a mixture of 5 parts of water to 1 part of oil was employed and the noise was totally eliminated; however, the retarder efficiency was substantially reduced.

The mixture of oil and water appears thoroughly emulsified. The Texaco 1609 class 38 soluble heavy duty oil is reddish in appearance, but when mixed with i 10 parts of water to 1 part of oil provides a milky, almost opaque solution.

While there has been described what at present is considered to be the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made therein without departing from the invention. For example, it would be possible to interchange the liquid level detectors 207, 210, 216, 217 and 218 with continuous line level indicators to provide an analog output. Additionally, the refractometer 211 could continuously analyze the solution 212 to continuously adjust the oil and water mixture present in the mixing tank 204.

. Having thus described a noise suppression system in one specific embodiment, it is understood that this form is selected to facilitate the disclosure of the invention rather than to limit the number of forms which it 1. A noise suppression system for car retarders comprising a. a car retarder for partially braking a rail car, said retarder comprising a pair of elongated braking shoes mounted on either side of each rail, said elongate shoes being mounted on a support base and movable into and out of engagement with the wheels of the rail car when partial braking is desired,

b. a plurality of spray means mounted on said support base for spraying an oil-in-water emulsion against said rail car wheels, said emulsion consisting essentially of lubricating oil and water,

c. detector means for detecting the presence of a rail car and energizing said spray means.

2. A noise suppression system for car retarders as claimed in claim 1 wherein said retarder comprises a plurality of elongated braking shoes on either side of said rail, each of said braking shoes being provided with a plurality of spray nozzles for spraying said emulsion against said rail car wheels.

3. A noise suppression system for car retarders as claimed in claim 1 which further comprises a concrete basin which surrounds and supports said car retarder, said basin providing a collection sump for the emulsion sprayed by said spray means.

4. A noise suppression system for a rail classification yard, said system comprising a. a master car retarder for partially braking a plurality of rail cars, said master retarder comprising a pair of elongated braking shoes mounted on either side of each rail, said master retarder also comprising a detector means for detecting the presence of a rail car, and weight detector means for determining the weight of a rail car as it passes through said master retarder,

b. at least one group retarder for partially braking at least one rail car, said group retarder comprising a pair of elongated braking shoes mounted on either side of each rail, said group retarder also comprising detector means for detecting the presence of a rail car,

. a plurality of spray means mounted on each of said group retarders and said master retarder for spraying an oil-in-water emulsion against the wheels of a rail car, said emulsion consisting essentially of a lubricating oil and water,

d. control means for actuating said spray means mounted on said master retarder as said car is passed through the master retarder, and selectively activating the spray means mounted in said group retarder when said rail car exceeds a certain predetermined weight.

5. A noise suppression system for a rail classification yard as claimed in claim 4 wherein each of said retarders is mounted in a concrete basin, said basin defining a collection sump for said emulsion after it has been sprayed against said rail car wheels.

6. A noise suppression system for a rail classification.

yard-as claimed in claim 4 which further includes a fluid mixing and handling system to prepare and supply the oil in water emulsion. said means comprising a water inlet. an oil inlet. means for mixing said emulsion, and discharge means for conveying said solution to said spray means.

7. A noise suppression system for car retarders comprising a. a car retarder for partially braking a rail car, said retarder comprising a pair of elongated braking shoes mounted on either side of each rail, said elongated shoes being mounted on a support base and movable into and out of engagement with the wheels of a rail car when said partial braking is desired,

b. a plurality of spray means mounted on said support base for spraying an oil-in-water emulsion against said rail car wheels, said emulsion consisting essentially of a lubricating oil and water,

c. detector means for detecting the presence of a rail car and energizing said spray means,

d. mixing means for preparing and supplying said oil and water emulsion, said means comprising a water inlet, an oil inlet, means for mixing said emulsion, and discharge means for conveying said solution to said spray means.

8. A noise suppression system for car retarders as claimed in claim 7 which further comprises storage means for receiving the oil in water emulsion from said mixing means, said storage means having a liquid level means for withdrawing said emulsion from said mixing means when the level of emulsion in said storage means has dropped below a certain predetermined level, said storage means also defining means for supplying said emulsion to said spray means.

9. A noise suppression system for car retarders as claimed in claim 7 which further comprises a control means for activating said water inlet and said oil inlet and energizing said mixing means when said liquid level means indicates the emulsion in .said mixing means has dropped below a predetermined level;

10. A noise suppression system for car retarders as claimed in claim 8 which further comprises refractometer means for measuring the relative proportion of oil and water in said mixing means.

11. A fluid mixing and handling system for supplying a lubricating emulsion to a railway car retarder comprising a. a car retarder meansfor braking the wheels of a rail car,

b. spray means mounted on said car retarder for spraying an oil-in-water emulsion against a rail car wheel, said emulsion consisting essentially of a lubricating oil and water,

c. mixing means for preparing and supplying an oil and water emulsion, said mixing means comprising a water inlet, an oil inlet, means for mixing said emulsion and outlet means for discharging said emulsion,

d.'storage means for receiving the emulsion from said mixing means and supplying said emulsion to said spray means, said storage means also having a liquid level means mounted therein for indicating when the level of said emulsion has dropped below a certain predetermined level,

e. control means for receiving signals from said liquid level means and energizing means to withdraw additional emulsion from said mixing means.

12. A fluid mixing and handling system for supplying a lubricating emulsion as claimed in claim 11 wherein said mixing means further includes refractometer means to determine the proportion of oil and water being mixed in said mixing means.

13. A fluid mixing and handling system for supplying a lubricating emulsion to a railway car retarder as claimed in claim 12 which further comprises control valves for said water inlet and said oil inlet,said control means responsive to said refractomcter means to open and close said oil and water valves to achieve a predetermined proportion of oil and water in said mixing means. 1 g

* a: i a:

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US967774 *Aug 16, 1909Aug 16, 1910D C ThomasAutomatic oiling device.
US3155191 *Jan 12, 1959Nov 3, 1964New York Central Railroad CompAutomatic journal box oiling apparatus
US3713738 *Jul 8, 1971Jan 30, 1973Beet Sugar Dev FoundationMethod and apparatus for rapidly and selectively determining purity of process streams
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 * BN Studies Retarder Noise Abatement by Burlington Northern in 11/72, issue of Railway System Controls, pp. 14 17, 20.
2 * Conway Yard by Pennsylvania R.R., date 4/1/58.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4393960 *Jan 21, 1981Jul 19, 1983Aaa Sales & Engineering, Inc.Low noise railroad retarder brake shoe structure
US5676337 *Jan 6, 1995Oct 14, 1997Union Switch & Signal Inc.Railway car retarder system
US5829552 *Apr 26, 1994Nov 3, 1998Societe Industrielle De Produits Speciaux S.I.P.S.Method, device and composition for use in the maintenance of track equipment
US6585085 *May 30, 2000Jul 1, 2003Tranergy CorporationWayside wheel lubricator
US7096997Jun 10, 2003Aug 29, 2006Portec, Rail Products Ltd.Trackside friction management digital control system
EP1226059A1 *May 21, 2001Jul 31, 2002Tranergy CorporationWayside wheel lubricator
WO2000053481A1 *Mar 10, 2000Sep 14, 2000Bojan PavcnikMethod and device for decreasing braking noise level
WO2001092081A1 *May 21, 2001Dec 6, 2001Tranergy CorpWayside wheel lubricator
Classifications
U.S. Classification104/26.2, 184/3.2, 188/62, 188/264.00B
International ClassificationB61K7/00, B61B1/00, B61K7/02, B61K3/00
Cooperative ClassificationB61K3/00, B61K7/02, B61B1/005
European ClassificationB61K3/00, B61B1/00B, B61K7/02
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 19, 1991ASAssignment
Owner name: SASIB S.P.A., VIA DI CORTICELLA 87/89, 40128 BOLOG
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION, A CORP. OF NEW YORK;REEL/FRAME:005646/0241
Effective date: 19910311