|Publication number||US3841130 A|
|Publication date||Oct 15, 1974|
|Filing date||Nov 20, 1973|
|Priority date||Nov 20, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3841130 A, US 3841130A, US-A-3841130, US3841130 A, US3841130A|
|Inventors||Scott I, Swenck G|
|Original Assignee||Reynolds Metals Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (24), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent Scott, Jr. et al.
[451 Oct. 15,1974
[ BALL BAT SYSTEM 3.691.625 9/1972 Swcnck 273/72  In en o in C. Sco J G g R 3,735,463 5/l973 Merola 29/155 Swenck, both of Richmond, Va.
P E  Assignee: Reynolds Metals Company, nmary xammer Lowell A Larson Richmond, Va.
22 Filed: Nov. 20, 1973 ABSTRACT  Appl. No.: 417,695 The hollow metal body for a ball bat is made by machining a tapered surface on most of the length of hollow cylindrical metal extruded workpiece, and swag- '8 72/70 2 2 5 ing the machined portion of the workpiece to form the  Fie'ld 273/72 A desired outside contour of a ball bat, the wall thickness along the length of the metal body being determined by the balance of the thinning effect of the ma-  g gg fi g gi chining against the thickening effect of the swaging. 2,227 ,817 l/1941 Allen 72/367 4 Claims, 7 Drawing Figures 30 32 34 L l8 i 22 24 H I I J K PATENIED BUT I 5l974 am a or 2 BALL BAT SYSTEM BACKGROUND Bats for hitting balls vary with the particular. game being played, but have the common'characteristic of comprising a handle at one end for grasping the bat, and a portion at the other end for hitting the ball. In the case of the American baseball, for example, there are differences between bats used for professional hard ball, bats used for the soft ball, and bats used for Little Leaque games, but in general a design good for one of these uses can be adapted to the other two'uses.
Wooden ball bats have been conventional for years in all three types of American baseball mentioned above. However, the combination of population increase and lumber resources decrease has led to a search for other materials for making such bats. While all sorts of metals might be used, aluminum and alumi num base alloys are especially well suited for the purpose, considering strength to weight ratio, surface characteristics, forrnability and cost. While aluminum bats presently cost more than wood bats, they have the great advantage of lasting longer, and hence of costing less in the long run. I e v Early efforts to develop aluminum bats comprised the approach of mounting a cylindrical tube of extruded aluminum in a lathe and turning it down by pressure of a blunt instrument against the outside of the workpiece as it was rotated with a, shaping mandrel inside. The resultant shaped metal bat stock had its original extruded form along one end, where it was designed to hit balls, and had a reduced diameter at its other end, where it was designed to be gripped. A ba't made in this way had generally uniform thickness of its metal wall from one end to the other. The metal at the tapered-end was forced longitudinally away from the center of the bat. thus lengthening the original cylindrical extrusion. There was less metal per unit length at the tapered handle end of the bat, because of the uniformity of wall bat for hitting purposes,.and has in turn proved comthickness in conjunction with decreased diameter at V the handle end. As a result, the center of gravity of the bat was displaced from the geometric center of length of the bat in the direction of the hitting end of the bat. A bat made in this way thus had its metal weight concentrated toward the hitting end, where it should be for best results, and where it exists inherently in conventional solid wooden bats. Unfortunately, the turning down step was relatively expensive, and this'system of bat manufacture was apparently never employed on a large commercial scale in spite of successful tests of the product. j j
An improvement over the earlier aluminum bat is disclosed in Merola U.Si, Pat." No. 3,479,030, issued Nov. l8,' 1969. In accordance with the teaching'of that patent, a length of cylindrical aluminum extrusion is swaged down in a rotating the having a tapered throat into whichone end of the extrusion is'pressed. As the die rotates, the metal is radially compressed, without substantial lengthwise displacement; As compression occurs, the metal stock is thrust further into the die, until the workpiece has completed a predetermined end of the body to the other.
substantial influence on the weight distribution of the metal in the batfAlthough the hitting end of the bat-is plugged with a realtively large piece of material having a substantial weight, the fact remains that the handle end has more metal in it than is desirable from the point of view of weight distribution for purposes of good hitting characteristics. In spite of this, however, bats can be made by this-method at'a relatively low cost, and they have proved commercially successful on a substantial scale.
A further improvement is disclosed in Swenck US.
Pat. No. 3,691,625 which issued Sept. 19, 1972. In accordance with the teaching of that patent, the swa'ging operation described above in connection with the Merola patent is followed by a drilling operation to remove excess metal from the thickened handle end of the work piece. This gives better weight balance in the mercially successful on a substantial scale. It is believed tobe still the best method of making a metal ball bat having the relatively short tapered portion shown in the drawings of the two said patents.
In" accordance with the present-invention, bat design can be improved for better-performance, particularly in terms of improved capability for power hitters of hard balls, by the combination of machining a tapered surface along most of the lengthof the initial hollow cylindrical work piece, and then swaging the machined portion of the work piece to produce the desired configuration. The resultant gradual taper preferably begins relatively close to the handle end of the completed metal body, so that the gradually increasing outer diameter will provide increasing strength to resist excessive bending adjacent the grasped portion of the bat when a strong hitter connects with a hard thrown pro fessional baseball, as in a professional or collegiate game. Since there is no internal drilling, there is no problem of excessive thickening of the wall at the point where tapering of the body begins, as described in Column 3, Lines 36-37 of Swenck US. Pat, No. 3,691,625. Consequently,it is now made feasible to begin the taper of the bat as far back toward the handle as desired. The wall thickness along the length of the swaged portion of the body can be controlled by the amount of initial machining at'each point along the length of the bat,'and preferably this is doneso that the final wall thickness is substantially uniform from one The accompanying drawings'show, for pur'posesof illustration only, a present'preferred' embodiment of the invention. ln the drawings, i
FIG. 1 shows diagrammatically in section a hollow cylindrical metal workpiecej Y FIG; 2 shows diagrammatically in section the "work piece of FIG. lafter it has been machinedon the out- FIG. 3shows diagrammatically insection the work piece of FIG. 2 after it has chined portion; I I FIG. 4 showsdiagrammatically in, section the work 1 piece, of FIG. 3 after it has been furtherswaged,
movement into the die. As'explained.inthe-patent,
metal bat stock formed in this way has equal weight along its length from one end to the other. A minimum counterbore is made in the thickened reduced end, to. facilitate insertion of a wooden plug, but this has no FIG. 5 shows diagrammatically a completed ball bat incorporating the work piece of FIG. 4; l
FIG. 6 is afragmentary, front elevational view, pap tially in section and drawn to an enlarged scale, illustrating the hitting'end of the bat prior to the. insertion of an end plug; and, I i
been "swaged along'its ma- FIG. 7 is a fragmentary, front elevational view, partially in section illustrating the bat of FIG. 6 after inserting an end plug.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, a metal work piece indicated generally at 10 is shown in FIG. 1 to have a hollow metal body with cylindrical inside and outside surfaces. The work piece 10 is made of a light metal, such as aluminum or magnesium and alloys based on either of them. The present preferred example of work piece 10 is an aluminum alloy extruded, drawn, and heat treated.
The work piece 10 is initially machined to the form 10a illustrated in FIG. 2. This machining is done so that what is to become the handle end of the completed bat is machined on the outside to produce a cylindrical outer surface 11 extending along the length of the work piece 10a shown as dimension C in FIG. 2. The opposite end of the work piece 10a, which is to become the hitting end of the completed bat, is left with an unmachined cylindrical outer surface 14 along the length B shown in FIG. 2. The intermediate portion of the work piece 10a, extending along the length D in FIG. 2, between planes and 21, is machined on the outside to produce a conical outer surface 12 which tapers between the reduced outer diameter of the surface 11 and the unreduced outer diameter of the surface l4.The whole length of the inner surface 16 of the work piece 100 remains unmachined, with the same cylindrical surface 16 that was in the original work piece 10. Although the taper of the surface 12 has been described as conical, so that the taper varies linearly, the machining can be adjusted to achieve any other desired curvature for purposes of achieving the ultimate desired pur pose.
After said machining, the work piece 10a is subjected to an initial swaging operation to form the work piece 10b shown in FIG. 3. Such swaging may be of the conventional kind, in which a rotating swaging die is used. A conventional swaging die has an opening therethrough which is relatively small at one end, and relatively large at the other, with a conical or other tapered surface between the ends of the opening. The handle end of the work piece 10a is inserted into the large end of the first rotating swaging die, and the work piece 10a is pressed endwise against the die until all of the length C and a minor part of the length D have passed entirely through the small end of the first swaging die, leaving part of the remainder of the work piece 10a in the tapered portion of the die between its small and large end openings.
This produces an untapered, swaged end26 adjacent the handle end and a tapered, swaged portion 18 between planes 28 and 45.
The 'portion of the work piece 10b which is passed entirely through the small opening of the first swaging die is shown as'dimension E in FIG. 3, and the portion remaining in the tapered portion of the die is shown as along that portion of the length E corresponding to length C in FIG. 2 is uniformly thickened compared to the thickness of the wall of the work piece 10a along the length C shown in FIG. 2. This increase in thickness may be predetermined to offset to any desired degree the reduction of thickness caused by the initial machining along the length C shown in FIG. 2. The portion of the length E shown in FIG. 3 extending into one end of the length D shown in FIG. 2 has a wall thickness which may be slightly thicker than the wall thickness of the rest of the length E shown in FIG. 3 because the effect of the initial machining is to increase the wall thickness along the length D shown in FIG. 2 away from the handle end, while the effect of the first swaging operation is to progressively diminish the thickening effect of swaging along the length D toward the handle end. As to the portion of the work piece 10b along the length F, the offsetting effects of the machining operation in the first swaging operation likewise can be predetermined to give a substantially uniform wall thickness along the length F shown in FIG. 3, or to permit a grad ual increase of wall thickness from left to right in FIG. 3, depending on the predetermined thickness of adjacent portions of the bat.
The entire swaging operation could be done in one operation, if swaging dies were available which were of the proper dimensions to do so. However, conventional swaging dies have a relatively short length, usually up to about 13 inches, between the large and small ends of the die, and this limitation can be overcome in accordance with the invention by a second swaging operation, on the intermediate work piece 10b shown in FIG. 3. The second swaging die has a small end of less diameter than that of the first swaging die, and a large end of a less diameter than the large end of the first swaging die. The handle end of the work piece 10b is pressed against the large opening of the second swaging die while it is rotating, and this action is continued until the extreme end of the handle extends through the small end of the second swaging die, along the length H shown in FIG. 4 leaving the length I shown in FIG. 4 in the tapered portion of the second swaging die. Thus the second swaging operation produces an untapered swaged end 30 and a tapered portion 34 which extends between planes 32 and 28. The second swaging die may have the same but-preferably has a lesser degree of taper than the first swaging die, and this change of taper closely simulates that of conventional wooden baseball bats. The differing degrees of taper are in contiguous and abutting relationship.- The lengths and I shown in FIG. 4 together correspond substantially to the length E shown in FIG. 3,-(this being the total second swaging operation), while the lengths] and- K shown in FIG. 4 correspond to the lengths F and G shown in FIG. 3. The wall thicknesses along the lengths H and I may be predetermined by the amount of initial dimension F in FIG. 3. The length F of FIG. 3 extends machining" balanced against the amount of swaging, to provide'a uniform'wall thickness along H, LL and K, but preferably'H. has a uniform small wall thickness, and the thickness progressively increases along I and J until reaching a maximum uniform thicknessalong K.
Swaged length). However, an internal mandrel might be used, if its tendency to limit wall thickening and increase lengthening is taken into account in the choice of dimensions specified for the various steps.
After the two swaging operations, the work piece c shown in FIG. 4 is preferably trimmed at the handle end to the desired dimensions, and the large end is internally machined at 42 as shown in FIG. 6. The machined end is bullnosed and a suitable end plug 40 is inserted and locked in place by folded over portion 44. A handle grip 38 is also added to complete the bat.
Two illustrative examples are given below of baseball bats actually constructed in accordance with this invention with dimensions A-L being listed in Tables I and II wherein:
A overall length in inches of original tube or work piece 10a of FIG. 2;
B distance in inches of unmachined area from the hitting end of the work piece to the runout of the machined portion (FIG. 2);
C distance in inches of machined area of constant CD. from the handle end of the work piece to the beginning of the machined transition area 12 at plane 21 (FIG. 2);
D distance in inches of the machined taper or transition area 12 in FIG. 2 between planes 21 and 20. In Tables I and II this distance is a constant for all sizes;
E (FIG. 3) the constant outer diameter resulting from the first swaging operation;
F (FIG. 3) the Same as J (FIG. 4);
G n (FIG. 3) the same as K (FIG. 4);
H distance in inches after Sawing, from the handle end of the work piece having a constant diameter (O.D.) to the beginnning of the transition or tapered portion at plane 32 (FIG. 4) from the second swaging operation;
I length in inches of the transition or. tapered portion (FIG. 4) from the second swaging operation;
J length in inches of the transition or taper from the first swaging operation (FIG. 4);
K in inches of the unmachined and unswaged por- 6 tion at the hitting end of the work piece (FIG.
L overall length in inches of the finished work piece 10c (FIG. 4) cut to length.
From the foregoing examples, it will be seen that each bat has a relatively long taper area produced by the first and second swaging operations of 23 inches which substantially exceeds the l3-inch stroke capability of available swaging machines.
While presently preferred embodiments of the practice of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be understood that the description and drawings are for purposes of illustration only, and that the scope of the invention is limited only by the appended claims.
1. The method of making a metal body for a'ball bat comprising the steps of a. providing a cylindrical hollow metal work piece;
b. machining post of the length of the outside of the work piece, thereby reducing its wall thickness to a predetermined extent; and, 1 swaging down most of the machined portion of the work piece in successive swaging operations to form two abutting tapering sections, thereby shaping the work piece and increasing the thickness of the wall of the work piece to a predetermined extent where it had been thinned by machining, the
offsetting effects of machining and swaging being such as to provide a tapered metal bat'body having a predetermined wall thickness from one end to the other.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein a first swaging operation produces a first degree of taper on the outside of the work piece and a second swaging operation pro duces a lesser degree of taper on the outside of an abutting portion of said work piece.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the wall thickness is generally uniform from one end to the other.
4. The method of claim 1 in which the swaged length portion formed by said two abutting tapering sections is substantially greater than 13 inches.-
Table I NOMINAL BATSIZE A B c L H v 1 I. I K D (INCHES) (INCHES INCHES (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) INCHES) INCHES INCHES 32 31 43/l6 1113/16 317/16 4% 11 12 311/16 15 33 32 4 3/16 1213/16 32 7/16 5% 11 12 3 II/16 15 34 33 5 3/16 1213/16 33 7/16 5% 11 12 4 11/16 15 35 .34 5 3/16 1313 16 34 7/16 6% 11 12 411/16 15 TABLE II NOMINAL BAT SIZE A B C L, H 1 J I K 'D (INCHES (INCHES) (INCHES) (INCHES) )(INCHES) (INCHES) INCHES (INCHES) INCHES INCHES *zg g UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Patent No. 3 a 8'41, 3 Dated October 5 .9 7
Inventor(s) Irvin C Scott Jr. et a1 It is ::e1:t:if:ledthat: error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent are hereby corrected as shown below:
Column 6, line 20 for "post" read mostsighed and "sealed this 4th day of F'Iarch 1975'.
At'test Y 4 c r tARsPALL DANE.
.EUTH c MAbON Commissioner create-nus Attestlng Officer, and Trademarks
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2227817 *||Jun 3, 1938||Jan 7, 1941||C O Two Fire Equipment Co||Method of forming a container for high pressure fluid|
|US3691625 *||Mar 19, 1971||Sep 19, 1972||Reynolds Metals Co||Method of making ball bat metal body system|
|US3735463 *||Nov 4, 1971||May 29, 1973||Amerola Prod Corp||Method of forming tapered tubular members|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4145048 *||Apr 4, 1977||Mar 20, 1979||Basil Samuel C||Concentric basketlike target game|
|US4417462 *||Dec 4, 1981||Nov 29, 1983||Rockwell International Corporation||Axle spindle and method for making the same|
|US4744136 *||Nov 17, 1986||May 17, 1988||Ten Pro Corporation||Process for manufacturing end weighted bats|
|US4961576 *||Nov 23, 1988||Oct 9, 1990||Sandvik Special Metals Corporation||Constant wall shaft with reinforced tip|
|US5074555 *||Apr 24, 1989||Dec 24, 1991||Sandvik Special Metals Corp.||Tapered wall shaft with reinforced tip|
|US5626050 *||Dec 8, 1994||May 6, 1997||Aluminum Company Of America||Method of making metal ball bats|
|US5954602 *||Oct 2, 1998||Sep 21, 1999||Demarini Sports, Inc.||Bat end plug and method for making the same|
|US6146291 *||Aug 16, 1997||Nov 14, 2000||Nydigger; James D.||Baseball bat having a tunable shaft|
|US6344007||May 13, 1999||Feb 5, 2002||Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.||Bat with high moment of inertia to weight ratio and method of fabrication|
|US6735998||Oct 4, 2002||May 18, 2004||George A. Mitchell Company||Method of making metal ball bats|
|US6869373||Jul 15, 2002||Mar 22, 2005||American Trim, Llc||Knob for a metal ball bat and method of attaching knob|
|US7214152||Oct 6, 2005||May 8, 2007||Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.||Bat having a sleeve with slots|
|US7294073||Oct 4, 2005||Nov 13, 2007||Miken Sports, Llc||Bat having a sleeve with holes|
|US7361106||Oct 26, 2006||Apr 22, 2008||Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.||Bat having a sleeve with slots|
|US7377867||Oct 26, 2006||May 27, 2008||Rawlings Sporting Goods Company, Inc.||Bat having a sleeve with holes|
|US7485020 *||Aug 15, 2006||Feb 3, 2009||Yamaha Marine Kabushiki Kaisha||Outboard motor|
|US7534179||Sep 26, 2007||May 19, 2009||Miken Sports, Llc||Bat having a sleeve with holes|
|US7534180||Feb 15, 2008||May 19, 2009||Miken Sports, Llc||Bat having a sleeve with slots|
|US8517866 *||Aug 18, 2011||Aug 27, 2013||Larry W. Williams||Training bat|
|US20070042651 *||Aug 15, 2006||Feb 22, 2007||Daisuke Nakamura||Outboard motor|
|US20110209802 *||Mar 1, 2010||Sep 1, 2011||Chih-Feng Ho||Method for processing steel tubes and the likes|
|US20120046135 *||Aug 18, 2011||Feb 23, 2012||Williams Larry W||Training bat|
|CN100540168C||Mar 22, 2004||Sep 16, 2009||乔治·A·米切尔公司||Method for producing metal ball bar|
|EP0370978A2 *||Oct 25, 1989||May 30, 1990||Sandvik Special Metals Corp.||Constant wall shaft with reinforced tip|
|U.S. Classification||72/70, 473/566, 72/370.24|
|International Classification||A63B59/06, B21D51/16, A63B59/00|