|Publication number||US3841860 A|
|Publication date||Oct 15, 1974|
|Filing date||Jul 11, 1973|
|Priority date||Jul 11, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3841860 A, US 3841860A, US-A-3841860, US3841860 A, US3841860A|
|Original Assignee||Dentsply Res & Dev|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (15), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 1191 h Wolf Oct. .15, 1974  DENTAL ALLOY 3,532,521 10 1970 Bakan et al 75/l69  Inventor: Donald Timothy Wolf, Milford, vDel.
. Primary Examiner-L. Dewayne Rutledge  Asslgnee ggs g ig fs g i Development Assistant Examiner-E. L. Weise  Filed: July 11, 1973  Appl. No.: 378,361  ABSTRACT A novel dental restorative is described which achieves 52 us. 01. 75/.s R 75/169 75/173 impmved Physica' propemfs by COmbi'  Int Cl C22c 5/00 B22f H00 nation of amalgamatable silver-copper-tm dental al-  Fie'ld 75/69 C 5 R loys in the trituration with a minimum of mercury where one of the silver-containing alloys contains be-  References Cited tween percent and percent copper by weight of UNITED STATES PATENTS 2/1967 Youdelis 75/169 the single alloy component.
1 Claim, No Drawings DENTAL ALLOY BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The mainstay restorative material used in the midst of rapidly advancing technology in the health care fields is still dental amalgam made by triturating a silver, tin alloy with mercury to form a coherent settable mass. This use of this material remains the standard technique used by the dental profession in repairing carious tooth structure. The oral environment has proven'to be hostile and difficult for the newer materials designed-to replace the amalgam restoration.
Likewise, newer amalgamatable dental alloys have been developed which improve on the classical advantages of this type of restoration. Improvements in compressive strengths, reduction in static flow or creep of the set amalgam, corrosion resistance and controlled expansion in a professionally acceptable material for dental restoration techniques are all sought in any new materials.
The novel restorative product of the present invention achieves improved properties in the foregoing areas by employing an alloy composition made up of a mixture of at least two silver, copper and tin-containing dental alloys where the copper content of one of the alloys is at least 15 percent by weight of that alloy and that alloy comprises at least 50 percent by weight of the total of all the amalgamatable silver-containing alloys used.
The following examples demonstrate the preferred alloy compositions which can be used to make the dental restorative material of the present invention.
EXAMPLE 1 A dental restoration according to the present invention was prepared by triturating 45 percent by weight of mercury with 55 percent by weight of a specially prepared dental alloy in a capsule on a mechanical mixer which is operated for approximately seconds. The resulting coherent mass of unset triturated amalgam is then placed in a standard mold cavity and condensed by applying a dead load of 2,030 psi for 90 seconds. The load is then removed and the amalgam permitted to set upon standing for at least minutes. The exact procedural details of testing can be determined with reference to American Dental Association Specification No. l for Alloy for Dental Amalgam with June 1970 revision (see Guide to Dental Materials and Devices 6th edition American Dental Association publication, 211 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, lllinois, 60611, pp 168-171).
Tensile strength measurements are taken at 15 minutes, flow at 3 to 24 hours, and dimensional change is measured at 5 minutes to 24 hours, according to the ADA Specification hereinbefore identified.
The specially prepared alloy of this example was prepared by spraying two different molten alloy compositions at approximately 2,000F, sizing according to a preselected particle size distribution, annealing the resulting alloy when desired and then blending the separate alloys in a predetermined proportion. The first alloy component was prepared by spraying molten alloy having the composition by weight, 70 percent silver, 22 percent copper and 8 percent tin in a conventional manner, i.e., such as described in US. Pat. No. 3,305,356, issued Feb. 21, 1967 at Column 2, lines 9 et seq through Column 3, line 25. The alloy is then collected and sized by Vortec brand air classification equipment which separates the alloy into two fractions approximately 20 microns and larger and the second 20 microns and smaller.
Typically, the 20 micron and larger fraction is then sieved in a 325 mesh sieve and the fraction containing particles over 20 microns in size and under 44 microns in size are all retained and blended with the fraction containing particles of 20 microns and under in predetermined proportions which help to establish set time in the final alloy.
Typically, a three to five minute work time before set with approximately 40 to 50 percent by weight of mercury is desired and' can be accomplished by using an alloy comprising percent by weight of the larger particle size fraction and 20 percent by weight of the smaller particle size fraction.
The second alloy component used is similar to conventional dental alloy used today, i.e., L. D. Caulk Spherical Alloy, which conforms to the ADA standard for such alloys and comprises approximately 65 percent silver minimum and a maximum of 29 percent tin, a maximum of 6 percent copper and a maximum of 2 percent zinc. The alloy is classified as the first component by preparing two fractions with a Vortec brand air classifier, one having particle sizes 15 microns and larger, and one having particle sizes 15 microns and smaller. Again, the larger particle size fraction is sieved with a 325 mesh sieve resulting in a fraction having particle sizes from 15 microns to 44 microns in size. To control work time in the final alloymixture, the 15 micron to 44 micron fraction is annealled by heating at 320F for between 1 and 6 hours. The smaller particle size fraction is annealed to a dead soft condition by heating at 680F for 24 hours. The two particle size fractions are thus blended to a composition typically containing 50 percent by weight of each fraction with variations being possible depending on the length of annealling of each fraction, as well as the relative particle size distribution in the fractions.
The first and second alloy components are then blended to a composition comprising 60 percent by weight of the first alloy component and 40 percent by weight of the second alloy component.
The foregoing composition, when evaluated according to the ADA Specification and other tests, shows superior properties as shown in the data in Table l and compared to the standard for dental amalgams.
EXAMPLE 2 An amalgam was prepared as in Example 1, using a first alloy component of 70 percent silver, 25 percent copper and 5 percent tin with the results shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE 3 An amalgam was prepared as in Example 1, using percent of a first alloy component comprising 70 percent silver, 25 percent copper and 5 percent tin with the results shown in Table 1.
EXAMPLE 4 EXAMPLE 5 A satisfactory amalgam restoration is prepared as in Example 1, using 60 percent of a first alloy component comprising 70 percent silver, '1 5 percent copper and 15 percent tin.
EXAMPLE 6 A satisfactory amalgam restoration is prepared as in Example 1, using 50 percent of a first alloy component comprising 60 percent silver, 30 percent copper and 10 percent tin.
EXAMPLE 7 46:!372-1381, 1967; and G, E. Stoncr. K. R. Lawless and F. Wawncr. J. Dental Research 501519 Accordingly, it is important that sufficient tin is present in the dental alloy to produce Ag-,Sn, while his undesirable for any substantial amount of tin to be present in a form which is available for the formation of the Gamma 2 phase product of tin and mercury.
While it is not certain at the present time what the exact mechanism may be, it is postulated that the addition of copper in the manner described herein has a A satisfactory amalgam restoration is prepared as in i5 Example 1, using 60 percent of a first alloy compone t twofold beneficial effect on amalgamatable sllver-tincomprising 80 percent silver, percent copper and 5 Contammg dental y percent i First, the copper 15 in a form 1n the first alloy component which permits it to preferenually react w1th the tin EXAMPLE 8 of the second component before any substantial A satisfactory amalgam restoration is prepared as in amOUIlt of Gamma 2 has been fOfmedn y. it p- Example 1, using 60 percent of a first alloy component pears that besides scavengermg tin, the copper tends to comprising 75 percent silver, 23 rce t pp d 2 harden the resultant amalgam, thus reducmg dynam1c percent tin. creep or flow, and reducing the phenomenon of ditch- 25 ing in the placed dental restoration. This occurs when EXAMPLE 9 the forces of mastication or chewing work the more A satisfactory amalgam restoration is prepared as in flowable restorations over the edge of a restorative cav- Example 1, using 90 percent by weight of a first alloy ity with subsequent fracturing of the extruded material component comprising 70 percent silver, 15 percent and exposure of the margin of the restoration to carious copper and 15 percent tin. attack. The reduction in dynamic creep, which the TABLE 1 ADA STD. Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Tensile psi:
15 minutes 290 psi i232 psi 639 psi 372 psi minimum 1 hour 3246 psi 24 hours 7324 psi Compressive Strength 0.02 in/min; Crosshead Speed 1 hour 30,582 22,471 23,710 24 hours 59.105 64,846 57,596
Compressive Strength .002 in/min. Crosshead Speed 24 hours 47,041 49,874 48,761
Dead Load Flow Between 3 and 24 hours 3% 0.3% 0.35% 0.5%
maximum Ex ansion Microns/cm :20 0.94 +8.3 -0.8
The amalgam prepared according to the present inhardening effect of copper has in these systems, vention possesses many superior features over present thereby provides an unexpected benefit in the reduccommercially available dental alloy amalgam preparation of carious attack on margins. tions. For example, it is now considered important to Further, the u f f the resultant amalgam resto- Wold amalgam Preparanons Whlch Perm1t significant ration is relatively corrosion-free and capable of being amounts of tin in the dental alloy to react with mercury b rnished, However, the margins of the amalgam restobecause of tins propensity to form a phase of a specific ration seem, for some reason, to provide f an imercury-tin compound (Sn Hg8). known as Gamma 2 ronment which is conducive to the ionization of the phase. This Gamma 2 phase is the Sims for t e CO O- metals present at the surface. This ionization permits sion which contributes to the failure of present dental amalgams in service. It has been recognized that a reduction in the amount of this phase present enhances the corrosion resistance of the amalgam restoration.
compound formation at the surface of the restoration which is contiguous to the tooth cavity, enhancing the mechanical fit of the restoration and tending to reduce margin seepage.
Likewise, the ionization seems to provide a bactericidal environment at the margin which discourages further carious attack at the margin of the tooth cavity next to the restoration.
The present invention has been described in terms of 5 the presently known preferred embodiments, and it is intended that compositions which may depart from those presently preferred which demonstrate the equivalent novel advantages in use, are to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
1. A dental composition amalgamatable by trituraper.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3305356 *||Oct 31, 1963||Feb 21, 1967||Youdelis William V||Dental amalgam|
|US3532521 *||Feb 3, 1969||Oct 6, 1970||Ncr Co||Amalgamation mixture containing encapsulated mercury|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3954457 *||Apr 28, 1975||May 4, 1976||Gary Maurice Weikel||Dental amalgam|
|US3963484 *||Aug 20, 1974||Jun 15, 1976||Sarkar Nikhil K||Dental amalgam alloys|
|US3980472 *||Jul 16, 1975||Sep 14, 1976||Special Metals Corporation||Dental amalgam|
|US3997327 *||Dec 29, 1975||Dec 14, 1976||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Dental composition|
|US3997328 *||Dec 29, 1975||Dec 14, 1976||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Dental amalgams|
|US3997329 *||Dec 29, 1975||Dec 14, 1976||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Dental composition|
|US3997330 *||Dec 29, 1975||Dec 14, 1976||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Dental amalgams|
|US4008073 *||Nov 18, 1975||Feb 15, 1977||Deutsche Gold- Und Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler||Alloy powder for the production of dental amalgam|
|US4226622 *||Aug 24, 1978||Oct 7, 1980||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Corrosion-resistant dental alloy|
|US4234339 *||Aug 24, 1978||Nov 18, 1980||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Corrosion-resistant dental alloy|
|US4235631 *||Aug 24, 1978||Nov 25, 1980||Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation||Corrosion-resistant dental alloy having improved handling characteristics|
|DE2631906A1 *||Jul 15, 1976||Feb 10, 1977||Special Metals Corp||Metallpulvermischung fuer die herstellung von in der zahnheilkunde verwendbaren zahnamalgamen durch mischen mit quecksilber|
|DE2658785A1 *||Dec 24, 1976||Jun 29, 1978||Wieland Fa Dr Th||Dental compsn. with improved corrosion resistance - consisting of dispersion-strengthened amalgam of silver-tin-copper alloy|
|EP0147383A2 *||Dec 5, 1984||Jul 3, 1985||ÖGUSSA Österreichische Gold- und Silber-Scheideanstalt Scheid und Roessler Gesellschaft m.b.H. & Co. KG.||Alloy powder mixture for preparing dental amalgam|
|WO1983002959A1 *||Jan 17, 1983||Sep 1, 1983||Sybron Corp||Admix dental alloy and amalgam|
|U.S. Classification||75/255, 420/527|
|International Classification||C22C5/06, A61K6/02, A61K6/05|
|Cooperative Classification||A61K6/05, C22C5/06|
|European Classification||C22C5/06, A61K6/05|