|Publication number||US3848091 A|
|Publication date||Nov 12, 1974|
|Filing date||Apr 12, 1973|
|Priority date||Apr 12, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3848091 A, US 3848091A, US-A-3848091, US3848091 A, US3848091A|
|Inventors||B Elpern, W Stearns|
|Original Assignee||Holmes J|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (20), Classifications (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent Stearns et al.
[ Nov. 12, 1974 METHOD OF FITTING A PROSTHETIC 2,768,236 l0/l956 Allison 179/1 N DEVICE OR PROVIDING CORRECTIONS 3,404,235 10/1968 Goldberg 179/1 N 01111 222122; 211221 2:11;: 1221:: AURALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONS  Inventors: William P. Stearns, Scottsdale; primary Emminer R-a|ph Biukcslec g f Elpem, Phoemx, both of Attorney, Agent. or FirmLy0n and Lyon  Assignee: John L. Holmes, Scottsdale, Ariz. 5 ABSTRACT  Filed: 1973 The method of fitting a prosthetic device for providing 21 App] 350 377 compensatory amplification for aurally handicapped persons. The method includes the steps of determining absolute threshold information and tone discomfort  US. Cl 179/1 N, 181/.5 G, 179/107 F information and coupling the subject to a master hear- 128/2 Z ing aid which includes a filter network selected to be  Int. Cl H04! 25/00 in the genfiral range of the acuity deficiency as damp  F'eld of Search 107 107 FD; mined by the above information. Then, forced-choice 181/5 G; 128/2 Z paired-comparison techniques, using continuous discourse, gives the required information for selecting  References cued the appropriate filter, filter gain and flat gain parame- UNITED STATES PATENTS ters to be used as a single filter network in a prosthetic 2,112,569 3/1938 Lybarger 179/1 N device.
2,394,569 2/1946 Strom l79/l N 2,625.233 1/1953 Curry??? 179/1 N 14 Clam, 9 Drawlng Flgul'es PATENI w 1 21 974 3.848.091 SNEEIHF 4 QSNNQQ METHOD OF FITTING A PROSTHETIC DEVICE FOR PROVIDING CORRECTIONS OF AUDITORY DEFICIENCIES IN AURALLY HANDICAPPED PERSONS CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS The present application is directed to inventive concepts which are related to those described in copending application Ser. No. 133,229, filed Apr. 12, 1971 by William P. Stearns and entitled, Method and Apparatus for Providing Electronic Sound Clarification for Aurally Handicapped Persons". The present application also is related to co-pending applications, Ser. No. 229,322 filed Feb. 25, 1972 in the names of William P. Stearns and John K. Lauchner entitled, Apparatus and Prosthetic Device for Providing Electronic Correction of Auditory Deficiencies for Aurally Handicapped Persons, and Ser. No. 229,398 filed Feb. 25, 1972 in the names of William P. Stearns and Barry S. Elpern entitled Method for Providing Electronic Restoration of Speech Discrimination in Aurally Handicapped Persons. The present application also is related to the co-pending application Ser. No. 350,415 filed Apr. 12, 1973. concurrently filed herewith in the names of William P. Stearns, Vernon O. Blackledge and John S. Rohrer, entitled Prosthetic Device for Providing Corrections of Auditory Deficiencies in Aurally Handicapped Persons which describes and claims apparatus disclosed herein. All of the above cited applications are assigned to the assignee of the present application and the disclosures thereof are incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE'INVENTION This invention relates to the sound amplification arts, and to their application in the amelioration of auditory deficiencies resulting from damage to the sensorineural structures of the human ear. It relates particularly to methods for correcting deficiencies in a persons ability to perceive and to comprehend spoken language.
Sensori-neural hearing loss is generally considered to be the most prevalent type of auditory handicap found in the United States as well as in other civilized cultures. It constitutes a significant barrier to adequate communication in 5 to percent of the total United States population, and in more than 50 percent of the opulation over 60 years of age. Furthermore, these proportions are expected to increase in conjunction with ongoing increases in ambient noise levels and life expectancy in our society.
Sensori-neural impairment may result from any one or more of a number of causes, including, but not limited to genetic and congenital factors, viral diseases,
specific toxic agents, circulatory disturbances, specific physical traumaand excessive exposure to noise. Irrespective of the primary cause, however, sensory cells within the organ of hearing or their associated neural units suffer some degree of damage and are rendered partially or totally incapable of fulfilling their respective roles in the processing of auditory information. This form of damage cannot be repaired by means of currently known medical or surgical techniques, and the probability of discovery of effective techniques within the foreseeable future appears rather remote. Thus, in virtually all cases of sensori-neural hearing loss, amplification of incoming sounds represents the only possible means for restoring adequate hearing ability.
Hearing loss resulting from sensori-neural damage is usually irregular with respect to frequency, being selectively greater for particular portions of the audible frequency range. The ability to hear sounds in the range above 1,000 Hz is often affected more than the hearing of sounds below 1,000 Hz, although this is by no means a universal observation. The ultimate consequence of irregular hearing acuity for various portions of the audio frequency spectrum is distortion in the perception of complex sounds, i.e., sounds composed of a number of different frequencies.
A certain amount of distortion in complex sounds may be tolerable, but current information does not permit precise specification of the maximum amount of each type of distortion which may exist without interfering materially with accurate sound recognition. Many gross sounds, for example, do not demand a great deal of analytic power in the auditory system, so even a rather severely impaired system may function adequately in the interpretation of such sounds.
In audiologic parlance, the term discrimination denotes the capacity of the ear to analyze incoming acoustic patterns and interpret them appropriately. Analytic power may fail at any of several stages in the auditory process, commonly in the organ of hearing or first order neurons due to damage to these structures. Since the ear may be required to perform many degrees of discrimination, varying from extremely coarse to extremely fine, its analytic power may be measured through the use of tests which demand auditory discriminations of progressive difficulty until failure occurs.
Among the most difficult discriminations required of the human ear are those necessary for accurate interpretation of speech, particularly speech in the presence of noise. Because of the fundamental importance of spoken communication, it is obvious that chronic inability to understand what people say could profoundly influence an individuals social, economic and cultural well-being. Tests of speech discrimination are commonly employed, therefore, to derive a realistic estimate of a persons everyday functional adequacy in hearing.
Each of the phonic units of a spoken word is a complex sound, composed of several frequencies clustered in a more-or-less definable range. When the acuity of the ear has been selectively impaired in a specific frequency range, speech sounds or their components falling in that range may be heard at reduced intensity or not at all. Impairment in several frequency ranges compounds the difficulty and is probably responsible in large measure for the primary complaint of the individual with sensori-neural hearing loss, that he can hear a speakers voice but cannot understand what is said. The mechanism for inhibiting such understanding may be the non-linear responses that result in intermodulation products and harmonics which could cause interference with the desired spectral components of speech.
On the basis of the foregoing information, it would seem quite reasonable to deal with scnsori-neural hearing loss by selective spectrum amplification; that is, providing amplification only in those frequency ranges or bands in which acuity is deficient, and only in the amount of the deficiency. Thus, the ultimate value of selective spectrum amplification rests on the application of appropriate methods for measuring the degree of auditory deficiency as a function of various frequency bands, and also on the construction of a wearable device which is fully capable of producing amplification to compensate for the measured deficiencies. Because of existing inadequacies in both respects, the principle of selective amplification has fallen into disrepute, for the hearing aid industry has adopted the pure tone (single frequency) threshold audiogram as the criterion measurement, and has produced hearing aids with inadequate capabilities for providing proper acoustic output at each portion of the audio band.
The threshold audiogram curve represents an individuals measured absolute auditory threshold for a series of pure frequency tones, usually in the range of 250 Hz to 8000 Hz sampled at octave intervals on the assumption that intra-octave tone thresholds follow the general audiogram contour. However, it is demonstrable that fairly marked departures from this overall pattern may exist at intermediate frequencies, i.e., frequencies between pure tones one octave apart.
The rationale for utilizing threshold measurements is shrouded in history, but it is exceedingly interesting to note that the analogous procedure of measuring visual thresholds for monochromatic (single color) lights is never performed to measure the visual acuity of the eye or to prescribe eyeglasses. In fact, careful consideration of the types of measurements which are genuinely helpful in guiding the design of particular hearing aid features suggests that the pure tone threshold curve is virtually useless for several reasons:
A. Under everyday circumstances, individuals react only to supra-threshold sounds, as these are the sounds of primary significance. For practical purposes, threshold sounds remain unnoticed.
B. The contour of an individuals threshold curve is observably different from the contour of his suprathreshold equal loudness curves or comfortable listening level curves.
C. An individuals recognition of complex phonic units or their combination into spoken words is essentially unrelated to his acuity for individual pure tones.
Control of acoustic output in current hearing aids is ordinarily achieved through manipulation of frequency response, which refers to the acoustic output of a sound transmission system at each of the frequencies within its pass band when the input level is maintained constant for all frequencies. A graphic representation of a systems frequency response is referred to as a response characteristic, curve or contour. Manufacturers com- Imonly claim that they are able to build hearing aids to One additional comment is relevant as a preface to the innovative concepts to which the present invention is particularly addressed. It is generally recognized that the ear with sensori-neural hearing loss is excessively susceptible to overloading, which is to say that, although it may-be relatively insensitive to sounds of low or moderate intensity, it is hypersensitive to sounds of higher intensity (i.e., non-linear response characteristics). This condition restricts the useful operating range of the ear, referred to as the dynamic range; that is, the decibel difference between the lowest intensity at which a sound is reliably detected (absolute threshold) and the upper limit of comfortable loudness for that sound (discomfort threshold).
Whereas the dynamic range of the normal ear is of the order of dB, the range of a sensori-neurally impaired ear may be as little as 10 or 15 dB, generally over a limited frequency spectrum range. Thus, for an impaired ear to function with any degree of adequacy, the full intensity range of the outside acoustic world must be restricted in some way to fit through an abnormally small sound window and such restriction must cause minimal intermodulation products, harmonics, and so forth which would result in distortion. Without such restriction, the ear is readily overloaded, leading to psychologic or physical annoyance and distortion of incoming acoustic patterns.
The consequences of overloading have been appreciated for many years, and output compression devices are widely used in todays hearing aids. Without exception, however, these devices operate on a broad frequency band, so that when any frequency component of a signal reaches a predetermined critical level, the entire pass band of the hearing aid is compressed. Consequently, the components which are not at a critical intensity are needlessly attenuated.
Our evaluation of relevant factors has led to the evolution of several innovative concepts concerned with improved methods and apparatus for measuring and describing auditory deficiency for purposes of prescribing compensatory amplification, and with improved methods and apparatus for providing such compensatory amplification in practical and wearable form.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION While the present application and the previouslymentioned, concurrently-filed application include similar disclosures, for the sake of completeness, the claims of the present application are particularly directed to methods of the nature disclosed herein and equivalents thereof for enabling the objectives set forth herein to be accomplished. Accordingly, it is an objective of the present application to provide an electronic correction system with the following capabilities:
a. Division of the audible frequency spectrum into two or more adjacent frequency bands through the use of a filter network. The width and location of these bands are adjustable. They can be set so as to closely fit the patients required response curve. This required curve may be determined by the method as defined in the previously mentioned U.S. Pat. application No. 229,309 entitled Method for Providing Electronic Restoration of Speech Discrimination in Aurally Handicapped Persons in the names of Stearns and Elpern filed Feb. 25 1972, which application is assigned to the assignee of the present application and the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference;
b. specific and individual intensity or volume control associated with each of the frequency bands defined in (a) above;
c. specific and individually adjustable output compression associated with each of the bands defined in (a) above;
d. electro-meehanieal transduction of electronically processed signals into acoustical signals, such transduction occurring within the external auditory canal of the test subject; and
e. pre-amplification and mixing of input signals for broadband intensity control.
Another object of this invention is to provide a method of fitting a prosthetic device for providing corrections of auditory deficiencies in aurally handicapped persons to be accomplished by electronic techniques.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The invention both as to its organization and principle of operation together with further objects and advantages thereof may better be understood by referring to the following detailed description of an embodiment of the invention when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary embodiment of the basic concepts utilized in the present invention to provide compensatory amplification in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of an exemplary embodiment of the basic concepts utilized in the present invention to provide compensatory amplification in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of a highpass filter network utilized in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 4 is a circuit diagram of a bandpass filter network utilized in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram for an alternate embodiment of a summing amplifier in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 6 is a diagram of highpass response curves in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 7 is a diagram of bandpass response curves in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 8 is a system block diagram of apparatus for the testing method utilized in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 9 is a system block diagram of apparatus, including details of the master hearing aid unit in the system of FIG. 8 of the testing method in accordance with this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring now to FIG. 1, a basic hearing aid is illustrated which can be employed to duplicate a subjects required response curve in a manner described subsequently. The resulting hearing aid will be wearable and may be as small as practical and readily adapted to be manufactured in a miniaturized wearable form. The basic components of such a hearing aid include a transducer, such as a miniature ceramic microphone 11, including a built-in, low noise, field effect transistor amplifier. A unit similar to the Knowles BL-l67l may readily be employed in the practice of this invention as a suitable transducer stage. Such a unit has a frequency response from less than 100 Hz to greater than 8,000 Hz, as measured by standard hearing aid microphone measurement techniques. Microphone 1 l is such a unit and receives power for its built-in field effect transistor (PET) amplifier from a 1.3 volt DC source The output of the microphone 11 is connected to an input of a broadband automatic gain control (AGC) 12.
The broadband AGC output is connected to an input of a preamplifier 13. Preamplifier 13, as is well known in the art, may incorporate an internally compensated circuit, such as an integrated operational amplifier similar to Fairchild 776. The preamp 13 may precede the broadband AGC 12 without altering the effect of the units. The preamp 13 may also be an integral part of the broadband AGC 12. The output of the preamp 13 is to an input of a flat gain control 14 and an input of a filter AGC 15.
The output of the filter AGC 15 is connected to an input of an active filter network 16. The filter network 16 comprises a filter arrangement such as a highpass filter (in FIG. 3) or a bandpass filter (in FIG. 4) and may include a plurality of filters or filter types to provide flexibility to achieve individualized auditory compensation. The broadband AGC 12 provides compression over the whole audio spectrum (to prevent loud inputs from producing discomfort and/or amplifier saturation), and the filter AGC 15 provides for additional compression control over a predetermined portion of the audio spectrum which depends upon the selected filter network 16. Thus the dual AGC system 12 and 15 provides two functions: 1) it prevents discomfort and- '/or amplifier saturation and 2) it provides decreasing high-frequency emphasis for louder sounds. Previously mentioned applications Ser. No. 229,322 and Ser. No. 229,398 described the importance of fitting the filter curve to a patients conversation-level loudness curve and not to his threshold-level curve. Thus, filter AGC 15 allows the fitting to both these curves simultaneously. The filter AGC 15 and the filter 16 can be interchanged without affecting performance.
The output of the flat gain control 14 is connected to a first input of a summation amplifier 17. The output of the filter 16 is connected to a second input of the summation amplifier 17. The signals at the first and second inputs of the summation amplifier 17 are linearly summed in the summation amplifier 17. The output of the summation amplifier 17 is connected to an input of a volume control 18, which attenuates the output signals from the summation amplifier 17 before feeding the siganls to a miniature magnetic receiver 19. The output of the summation amplifier 17 is also connected to an input of an automatic gain control detector 60, which in turn is connected at its output to a second input of the broad band automatic gain control 12 and a second input of the filter automatic gain control 15.
In operation, a DC supply, such as rechargeable or long-life batteries, provides a power source which allows the acoustical input signals to be fed from the microphone 11 to the broadband AGC 12.
The preamplifier l3 and the associated broadband automatic gain control 12 amplify and compress the signals from the microphone 11 and drive the filter AGC 15 and the flat gain control 14. The filter automatic gain control 15 compresses the filtered frequencies by an amount determined by the automatic gain control detector 60. The filter network 16 has an active bandpass or highpass filter configuration dependent on the patients hearingproblem. The two signals from the flat gain control 14 and the filter network 16 are each fed to the summation amplifier 17 to be summed and trol signals to the broadband automatic gain control 12 and the filter automatic gain control to control the overall compression and the filter compression. The wearable hearing aid described herein permits a substantial size reduction. Ease of repair, ruggedness, and waterproof scaling of the electronic circuits can be readily accomplished. Attractive and compact packaging for post-auricular (behind the ear) fittings can be provided in that the total circuit herein discussed is readily adaptable to commonly known integrated circuit techniques.
Referring now to a more specific discussion of the electronics circuitry utilized in the practice of this invention, the circuit of FIG. 2 illustrates the miniature ceramic microphone 11 which included a built-in, low noise, field effect transistor amplifier and is utilized as an input transducer. The input signals received at the microphone 11 are fed through the broadband automatic gain control network 12 to an input of an operational amplifier, which serves as the preamplifier 13. The output of the preamplifier 13 is passed through the filter automatic gain control network 15 to the input of a filter driver 16A. The output of the preamplifier l3 also is connected to the flat gain control 14. Filter network 16 receives its input from the filter driver 16A and in turn is connected to an input of an operational amplifier employed as the summation amplifier 17. A second input of the summation amplifier 17 is connected to the flat gain control 14. The output of the summation amplifier 17 is connected to the volume control 18, which in turn is connected to the receiver 19. The output of the summation amplifier 17 is also connected to the input of an automatic gain control potentiometer 60A, which is connected to the input of a peak detector circuit 60B. The two of which serve as the automatic gain control detector 60.
The operational amplifiers of FIG. 2 may be any state-of-the-art units such as Fairchild 776, which uses a 2.7V supply; or units that operate from a single 1.3V supply, or any number of similar units.
The circuit of FIG. 2 preferably employs a miniature magnetic receiver 19 at the output of the summation amplifier 17. Various miniature magnetic receivers can be connected to a driver circuit of a hearing aid, de-
pending on the patients requirements, i.e., for persons requiring more volume, larger diaphragm receivers can be used. Smaller receivers capable of being placed entirely within the ear channel can also be driven by the same driver stages.
In FIG. 2, the negative input of the amplifier 17 is used to sum both signals from the flat gain control 14 and the filter network 15. This provides same-poiarity summing. If an operational amplifier with differential inputs is used, it is also possible to sum the input from the filter network 16 into the negative (inverting) input and the input from the flat gain control 14 into the positive (non-inverting) input to provide opposite polarity summing as is illustrated in FIG. 5. This may be necessary dependent upon the filter characteristics.
In FIG. 5, the summation amplifier 17 has the input from the flat gain control connected to its positive (non-inverting) input and the input(s) from the filter(s) connected to its negative (inverting) input. This allows a smoother frequency response when used with some types of filters.
FIG. 3 illustrates a 7-pole highpass filter, including three operational amplifiers 25, 26 and 27 in an active filter configuration. A suitable filter has its break frequency capable of being placed anywhere from 200 Hz to l0,000 Hz. Adjusting the proper resistors (28, 29 and 30) determines the precise break frequency, and adjusting the proper resistors (31, 32, 33) determines the Q of each 2-pole section. The output of the highpass filter is linearly summed with the output of the flat gain control in the summation amplifier as previously described.
Referring now to FIG. 4, there is illustrated a 6-pole bandpass filter including three operational amplifiers 34, 3S and 36 in an active filter configuration. As in FIG. 3, any filter can be designated such that its center frequency can be placed between 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz. Adjusting the proper resistors (37, 38 and 39) determines the precise center frequency, and adjusting the proper resistors (40, 41 and 42) determines the Q of each 2-pole section. The output of the bandpass filter is linearly summed with the output of the fiat gain control in the summation amplifier as previously described. As in FIG. 3, the filters utilized may have a gain of from 0 dB to 40 dB or more. A typical gain in an embodiment of this invention would be 30 dB.
FIG. 6 and FIG. 7 illustrate highpass and bandpass response curves respectively. Further, FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate how the fiat gain can be adjusted in relationship to the filter gain. Once the filter has been tuned, a definite frequency response is obtained. The flat gain control provides a convenient method for raising or lowering the flat gain area of the curves in FIGS. 6 and 7 in relationship to the filter gain area. FIGS. 6 and 7 both illustrate two different flat gain control settings. The flat gain control settings being at approximately 30 and 40 dB.
The filter network 16 of FIG. 2 may be comprised of 2-pole, 3-pole, 4-pole, 5-pole, 6-pole or greater, highpass or bandpass filter configurations or combinations thereof to provide the desired response. More poles are generally required to provide steeper slopes.
Referring now to the system block diagram of FIG. 8, in the operate mode, a pure tone source 40 (such as a Wavetek is connected through a switch 51 to an input of a pulser 41, which in turn is connected at its output to an input of an amplitude modulator 42. The pulser 41 gates the tone from the source 40 at a rate from 2 to 10 Hz and a 50 percent duty cycle. The low frequency and the high frequency are so chosen that the patient wontt think the tone is continuous. The purpose of the pulser is to prevent fatiguing the patient and to allow easier recognition. He gets tired quicker if the tone is not pulsed. Some patients find certain pulse rates more desirable than other rates. The amplitude modulator 42 varies in magnitude of the pure tone from the pulser 41 exponentially with time (or with DC control voltage) at a rate of approximately 2 dB per second, increasing if an associated hand held switch 43 is not pressed. The amplitude modulator 42 possesses a dynamic range of 120 dB in order to permit traversal of virtually the entire range of human hearing (typically I34 to dB SPL at l KH The amplitude modulator 42 has two outputs. The amplitude-modulated, pulsed pure tone output is fed to a first input of a summation amplifier 44, the output of which is connected to a patients receiver 45. A DC voltage which corresponds to the logarithm of the amplitude of the pure tone is fed to the Y input of an XY recorder 46 in the operate mode through a switch 61. A suitable XY recorder 46 is the Esterline Angus XY 8511. A second output from the pure tone source 40, which corresponds to the logarithm of the frequency of the pure tone, is connected to the X input of the XY recorder 46. The pure tone source 40 is designed to automatically sweep exponentially from 100 Hz to 10,000 Hz at a sweep speed of approximately one octave per minute.
In a calibration mode the output from the pure tone source 40 is connected through the switch 51 to an input of an attenuator 47 which provides means for attenuating the tone to be fed to an input of the Master Hearing Aid (MI-IA) 49 through 'a switch 52 (with a sound field and a test tone mode). The output of the MHA 49 in the calibrate and test tone mode is connected through a switch 62 (with a sound field and a test tone" mode) to an input of the log converter 50. The log converter 50 provides a DC voltage through switch 61 to the Y input of the XY recorder 46, corresponding to the logarithm of the amplitude of the pure tone output of the Master Hearing Aid 49. With the pure tone'source 40 set to sweep, the response of the MHA 49 is plotted on the XY recorder 46.
FIG. 9 includes details of the Master Hearing Aid 49. A ceramic microphone 48, which includes a built-in field effect transistor, is connected to an input of a microphone preamplifier 53 in the Master Hearing Aid 49 when the switch 52 is in the sound field mode. The reamplifier 53 provides amplification prior to signals reaching a filter network. The signal from the output of the preamplifier 53 takes two routes, one through the filter network illustrated as filters 54, 55, 56 and one route through a fiat gain attenuator 59.
The outputs of the filters 54, 55 and 56 (three filters being chosen for convenience of illustration) are connected to inputs of a filter selector and/or attenuators unit 57. The unit 57, depending on the Master Hearing Aid 49, might select a single filter, or on another master hearing aid unit, might attenuate each of a plurality of filters separately.
The output (or outputs) of unit 57 is connected to a first input of a summation amplifier 58, and an output of the flat gain attenuator 59 is connected to a second input of the summation amplifier 58. The signals from the two previously mentioned routes arrive at the summation amplifier 58 and, at the output thereof are fed through switch 62 in its sound field mode and summation amplifier 44 to an associated receiver such as the patients receiver 45, all as illustrated in FIG. 8.
In operation and referring to FIG. 8 in the operate mode, to obtain an absolute auditory thresholdcurve, the test stimulus from the pure tone source 40 is a pure tone of gradually increasing frequency from approximately 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz pulsed at a rate from 2 to ID pulses per second by the pulser 41. The subject controls the intensity of the tone by means of the hand held switch 43-or the like. The subject causes the tone intensity to decrease to a just-inaudible level, immediately after which he causes the tone to increase to a justaudible level, repeating this procedure continuously as the tone frequency increases gradually. The results are readily recorded in ink on semi-log paper and provide data regarding the absolute threshold for pure tone as a function of frequency in the XY recorder 46.
To achieve information as to the auditory discomfort level for pure tones, the same test stimulus as utilized in obtaining information as to absolute auditory threshold for pure tones is utilized. The subject again (referring to FIG. 8 in the operate mode) uses the hand held switch 43 to control the intensity of the tone. The subject causes the tone intensity to increase to a level of distinct discomfort immediately after which he causes the tone intensity to decrease to a level which is tolerable, repeating this procedure continuously as the tone frequency increasesgradually. The results are recorded in ink on semi-log paper on the XY recorder 46 and provide data regarding intensity as a function of frequency which produces auditory discomfort.
From the observed results of the absolute threshold and the auditory discomfort curves, as obtained in the above manner, a hearing examiner will select a general filter network of a type (e.g., bandpass or highpass) and frequency range so corresponding to the broad range of acuity deficiency. Such filter (e.g., 54, 55, or 56 in FIG. 9) or filter combination, is initially selected to generally provide compensatory amplification in steps in the general frequency band which requires amplification. To determine more precisely the proper range and type selection to be made, the two curves mentioned previously may be used to determine the patient's required response curve in a manner disclosed in the previously mentioned U.S. Pat. application No. 229,309.
Referring now to FIG. 9 in the sound field mode, the receiver is coupled to the subjects ear by means of a custom fitted earmold or the like. The stimulus fed to the microphone 48 is recorded continuous discourse, preferably a short paragraph which is reiterated. The subject is required to make a forced-choice judgement, as the examiner presents the master hearing aid parameters in pairs. The individual filters (e.g., 54, 55 and 56) may be of any practical number to divide the selected broad frequency range into narrow ranges. For
. example, the subject listens to a brief period of continuous discourse with the master hearing aid set at a highpass filter number 54, and then to a similarly brief period of continuous discourse with the master hearing aid set at a highpass filter number 55. The subject is then required to choose which condition was best.
By using similar forced-choice paired comparison the best condition is determined for each parameters. The Master Hearing Aid 49 is then so set, and, the calibration mode of FIG. 8 is used to record on recorder 46 the final prescription or curves from which the examiner determines the filter, filter gain and flat gain combination which will provide the best qualitative performance and which will be implemented in a system such as FIG. 1 as a single filter network.
The subject is then coupled with an appropriate hearing aid, such as the Master Hearing Aid 49, which hearing aid has its parameters adjusted as described above. A recorded formalized word test, such as C.l.D. Auditory Test W-22 is then administered at a conversational loudness level, i.e., 65 dB S.P.L. and the subjects score on such test is noted. If the score obtained on the word test is not satisfactory, i.e., less than percent, the above tests as to the forced-choice paired comparison may be readily repeated.
Further refinements may be accomplished through analysis of information obtained on an accompanying questionaire, which will provide data regarding the subjects qualitative evaluation of the hearing aid in real life listening conditions.
A method is provided which determines absolute threshold and discomfort information over a predetermined audio range. The subject is then coupled to a master hearing aid which includes a filter network selected to be in the broad range of the acuity deficiency as determined by the above information. After a forced-choice paired comparison technique between individual filters in the selected filter network, the appropriate parameters are determined to achieve with a single filter network, compensatory amplification in a prosthetic device in a practical wearable form.
lt has been pointed out earlier that attempts to compensate for a subjects hearing loss by adjusting the frequency response of an acoustic transmission system so that such response mirrors the subjects absolute auditory threshold are largely futile, simply because humans do not respond to threshold stimuli in real-life listening situations. Only supra-threshold stimuli are of significance to the subject, and it is well known that the frequency response of the ear to supra-threshold stimuli is markedly different from its response to threshold stimuli. Ideally, then, an acoustic transmission system designed to compensate for hearing loss should provide a frequency response which varies so that it is appropriate for low intensity stimuli when low intensity stimuli are present, and for high intensity stimuli when high intensity stimuli are present.
While embodiments and applications of this invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many more modifications are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein described. The invention thereof is not to be restricted except as necessary by the prior art and by the spirit of the appended claims. What is'claimed as new and desired to be secured by Letters Patent of the United States is:
1. A method of fitting a prosthetic device having a single filter and a fiat gain control by-passing said filter for providing corrections of auditory deficiencies in an aurally handicapped subject comprising the steps of:
. 1. determining absolute threshold information over a predetermined audio range for a pure tone as a function of frequency, I
2. determining information over a predetermined audio range for tone discomfort level of a pure tone as a function of frequency;
3. providing the subject with an output from a master prosthetic device including a general filter network over a general range of acuity deficiency of the subject as determined by the results of step 1 and step 2. said general filter network including a plurality of individual filter networks;
4. providing the subject with a choice as to the better perception of continuous discourse between discourse at the output of the master device when the master device is set at different individual filter networks;
5. determining the best individual filter network to provide corrections of auditory deficiencies in the aurally handicapped subject in response to the results of step 4, and
6. choosing the prosthetic device having a single filter with the said characteristics of said individual filter network.
2. The method as in claim 1 wherein step 1 further comprises the steps of:
a. generating a signal of gradually increasing frequency from 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz of a pure tone;
b. pulsating the signal at at a comfortable number of pulses per second thereby forming a test stimulus; and
c. controlling the intensity of the tone of the test stimulus to achieve absolute threshold information.
3. The method as in claim'2 wherein step (0) further includes the steps of:
aa. causing the tone intensity to decrease to an approximate inaudible level;
bb. causing the tone intensity to increase to an approximate barely audible level; and
cc. repeating steps (aa) and (bb) continuously as the tone frequency gradually increases.
4. The method as in claim 1 wherein step 2 further includes the steps of:
a. generating a signal of gradually increasing frequency from 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz of a pure tone;
b. pulsating the signal at 2 to 10 pulses per second thereby forming a test stimulus;
c. controlling the intensity of the tone of the test stimulus to achieve auditory discomfort information.
5. The method as in claim 4 wherein step (c) further includes the steps of:
aa. causing the tone intensity to increase to a level of distinct discomfort;
bb. causing the tone intensity to decrease to a tolerable level;
cc. repeating steps (aa) and (bb) continuously as the tone frequency gradually increases.
6. A method of fitting a prosthetic device having a single fitter and a flat gain control by-passing said filter for providing corrections of auditory deficiencies in an aurally handicapped subject comprising the steps of:
l. generating a signal of gradually increasing frequency from 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz of a pure tone;
2. pulsating the signal at two pulses per second thereby forming a test stimulus;
3. causing the tone intensity to decrease to an approximate inaudible level;
4. causing the tone intensity to increase to an approximate barely audible level;
5. repeating steps 3 and 4 continuously as the tone frequency gradually increases;
6. generating a signal of gradually increasing frequency from 200 Hz to 10,000 Hz of a pure tone;
7. pulsating the signal at 2 to 10 pulses per second thereby forming a test stimulus;
8. causing the tone intensity to increase to a level of distinct discomfort;
9. causing the tone intensity to decrease to a tolerable level;
10. repeating steps 8 and 9 continuously as the tone gradually increases;
1 1. providing the subject with an output from a master prosthetic device including a general filter network over a general range of acuity deficiency of the subject as determined by the results of the above steps, said general filter network comprising a plurality of individual filter network;
12. providing the subject with a choice as to the better perception of continuous discourse, between discourse at the output of the master device when the master device is set at different individual filter networks;
13. determining the best individual filter network to provide corrections of auditory deficiencies in the aurally handicapped subject in response to the results of step 12; and
14. choosing the prosthetic device having a single filter with the said characteristics of said individual filter network.
7. The method as in claim 1 wherein step 1 includes the step of recording the absolute threshold information for the pure tone as a function of frequency.
8. The method as in claim 1 wherein step 2 includes the step of recording the auditory discomfort information for a pure tone intensity as a function of frequency.
9. The method as in claim 1 wherein step 1 includes the step of recording absolute threshold information for a pure tone as a function of frequency and step 2 includes recording auditory discomfort information for pure tone as a function of frequency.
10. The method as in claim 1 wherein the following step is added;
6. administering at a conversational loudness level a recorded formalized word test.
11. A method of fitting a prosthetic device having a single filter and a flat gain control by-passing said filter for providing corrections of auditory deficiencies in an aurally handicapped subject, the method comprising the steps of:
1. providing the subject with an output from a master prosthetic device, said master device including a general filter network over a general range of acuity deficiency of the subject, said general filter network including a plurality of individual filter network;
2. providing the subject with a choice as to the better perception of continuous discourse, between discourse at the output of the master device set at a first individual filter network and subsequently set at another individual filter network;
3. determinding the individual filter network to provide corrections of auditory deficiencies in the aurally handicapped subject in response to step 2, and
" 4. choosing the prosthetic device having a single filter with the said characteristics of said individual filter network.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein step 3 further includes the step of determining the best combination of individual filter networks to provide correction of auditory deficiencies in the aurally handicapped subject.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein step 2 further includes the step of continuously providing the subject with choices between discourse at the output of the master device set alternatively to pairs of individual filter networks until the best individual filter network is determined.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein step 3 further includes the step of determining the best combination of individual filter networks to provide correction of auditory deficiencies in the aurally handicapped subject.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2112569 *||Jun 16, 1936||Mar 29, 1938||E A Myers & Sons||Method and apparatus for selecting and prescribing audiphones|
|US2394569 *||Jul 14, 1941||Feb 12, 1946||Dictograph Products Company In||Fitting hearing aid device|
|US2625233 *||Oct 25, 1949||Jan 13, 1953||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Method of fitting hearing aids|
|US2768236 *||Dec 6, 1950||Oct 23, 1956||Patent Man Inc||Hearing test system|
|US3404235 *||Jan 18, 1966||Oct 1, 1968||Goldberg Hyman||Method and apparatus for the testing of hearing|
|US3531595 *||Oct 31, 1966||Sep 29, 1970||Michael S Demaree||Method and apparatus for the testing and treatment of hearing deficiencies|
|US3588358 *||Aug 29, 1968||Jun 28, 1971||Tracor||Method and apparatus for testing hearing|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3989904 *||Dec 30, 1974||Nov 2, 1976||John L. Holmes||Method and apparatus for setting an aural prosthesis to provide specific auditory deficiency corrections|
|US4139730 *||Aug 10, 1977||Feb 13, 1979||Barbara Franklin||Method of testing human auditory responses|
|US4143648 *||Apr 13, 1977||Mar 13, 1979||Behavioral Controls, Inc.||Portable therapeutic apparatus having patient responsive feedback means|
|US4188667 *||Nov 18, 1977||Feb 12, 1980||Beex Aloysius A||ARMA filter and method for designing the same|
|US4239047 *||May 22, 1978||Dec 16, 1980||William L. Griggs, III||Method and apparatus for aurally determining presence or absence of pathological stenosis|
|US4484345 *||Feb 28, 1983||Nov 20, 1984||Stearns William P||Prosthetic device for optimizing speech understanding through adjustable frequency spectrum responses|
|US4508940 *||Jul 21, 1982||Apr 2, 1985||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Device for the compensation of hearing impairments|
|US4577641 *||Jun 29, 1983||Mar 25, 1986||Hochmair Ingeborg||Method of fitting hearing prosthesis to a patient having impaired hearing|
|US4628276 *||Dec 14, 1984||Dec 9, 1986||Matsushita Graphic Communications Systems, Inc.||Logarithmically linearly controlled variable gain amplifier|
|US4803732 *||Oct 25, 1984||Feb 7, 1989||Dillon Harvey A||Hearing aid amplification method and apparatus|
|US5303327 *||Jul 2, 1991||Apr 12, 1994||Duke University||Communication test system|
|US6201875||Mar 17, 1998||Mar 13, 2001||Sonic Innovations, Inc.||Hearing aid fitting system|
|US6240193||Sep 17, 1998||May 29, 2001||Sonic Innovations, Inc.||Two line variable word length serial interface|
|US6574342||Feb 8, 2000||Jun 3, 2003||Sonic Innovations, Inc.||Hearing aid fitting system|
|EP0146355A2 *||Dec 14, 1984||Jun 26, 1985||Matsushita Graphic Communication Systems, Inc.||Logarithmically linearly controlled variable gain amplifier|
|EP0146355A3 *||Dec 14, 1984||Jun 11, 1986||Matsushita Graphic Communication Systems, Inc.||Logarithmically linearly controlled variable gain amplifier|
|EP0403069A1 *||May 8, 1990||Dec 19, 1990||Ford Motor Company Limited||Audio amplifier with voltage limiting|
|EP3185586A1 *||Dec 23, 2015||Jun 28, 2017||GN Resound A/S||Hearing device with improved feedback suppression|
|WO1985002085A1 *||Oct 25, 1984||May 9, 1985||The Commonwealth Of Australia||Hearing aid amplification method and apparatus|
|WO2017108802A1 *||Dec 20, 2016||Jun 29, 2017||Gn Resound A/S||Hearing device with improved initialisation of digital feedback suppression circuitry|
|U.S. Classification||73/585, 704/200.1|
|International Classification||H04R25/00, H03G9/02|
|Cooperative Classification||H04R25/502, H03G9/025, H04R25/70|
|European Classification||H04R25/70, H03G9/02B|