Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3854984 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateDec 17, 1974
Filing dateNov 27, 1973
Priority dateDec 17, 1971
Publication numberUS 3854984 A, US 3854984A, US-A-3854984, US3854984 A, US3854984A
InventorsRairden J, Schadler H
Original AssigneeGen Electric
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Vacuum deposition of multi-element coatings and films with a single source
US 3854984 A
Abstract
Multi-element coatings and films having a composition substantially the same as that of a precast ingot of source material are prepared by continuously and rapidly sweeping a high intensity electron beam over the source surface so that only a small volume is heated at any one instant, completely evaporated and vacuum deposited on a desired substrate as a coating of great uniformity in volume and thickness.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

MTR04 XR 3 98511 1984- UnitedfStates Pat ent 1 Schadler et al.

1451 Dec. 17, 1974 VACUUM DEPOSITION OF MULTI-ELEMENT COATINGS AND FILMS WITH A SINGLE SOURCE Inventors: Harvey W. Schadler, Scotia; John R.

Rairden, Ill, Schenectady, both of NY.

General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY.

Filed: Nov. 27, 1973 Appl. No.: 419,285

Related US. Application Data Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 209,359, Dec. 17, 1971, abandoned.

Assignee:

US. Cl 117/933, 117/107, 117/131, 1l8/49.l, 219/121 EB Int. Cl. C236 13/02 Field of Search 117/933, 106 R, 107, 131; 118/491, 49.5; 219/121v EB References Cited,

UNlTED STATES PATENTS 2,932,588 4/1960 Frank 117/106 R 3,432,335 3/1969 Schiller etal. 117/106 R 3,485,997 12/1969 Rheinberger 117/933 Primary Examiner-William D. Martin Assistant Examiner-John H. Newsome Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Charles T. Watts; Joseph T. Cohen; Jerome C. Squillaro [5 7] ABSTRACT 8 Claims, No Drawings This is a continuation-in-part of our copending patent application Ser. No. 209,359 filed Dec. 17, 1971, assigned to the assignee hereof and now abandoned.

This invention relates to a method of forming multi element coatings and films from a single source, and to a product produced thereby, and in more particular relates to the formation of coatings by vacuum deposition of predictable compositions essentially identical to that of the source material.

Coatings according to the invention find utility, for example, as applied to parts of gas turbine engines.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The electron beam heating of source materials for vacuum deposition of coatings and films is a well established processing technique. Commercially available types of equipment for this processing generally employ a maximum electron accelerating voltage of -20 KV. This type of equipment has proven to be excellent for depositing single element layers. However, when multi-element layers are required, control of deposit composition is difficult because of the differing vapor pressures of the elements at any given temperature. If a single source is used, the element or elements having the higher vapor pressure are distilled preferentially from a molten pool of the source material, giving rise to deposits of substantially different composition than that of the source. Additionally, the rates at which elements diffuse into such a melt can differ considerably with the result that the melt composition rapidly shifts away from that of the original source material which leads to further disproportion in the deposited coating.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the present invention, a small, high energy intensity electron beam during operation is continuously and rapidly swept over a surface of the source material so that evaporation takes place under highly nonequilibrium conditions. As a consequence, at any instant only a small volume (a few cubic milliinches) will be heated and evaporated without forming a persisting melt, thus overcoming the problem of the varying vapor pressures of the elemental components as well as that of different diffusion rates.

The coating produced is highly uniform throughout its thickness and volume as a result of control of the power density and beam sweep rate, which together determine the temperature of the incremental surface volume at the point of impact of the electron beam such as to achieve a vapor pressure for the least volatile constituent of the alloy of at least 10 torr.

Accordingly, an object of the invention is to provide a uniform thin film coating which is economical to apply and durable in use.

Another object of the invention is to provide a coated turbine blade which will resist hot corrosive conditions longer than coated blades heretofore known.

Still another object of the invention is to provide a coating on a turbine engine part which will resist attack under severe conditions of operation to which it is subjected-including severe oxidation and hot corrosion.

DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS In accordance with the invention, a multiple component source contains at least two elements, preferably selected from the group iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, aluminum, yttrium and silicon. The power density of the electron beam is controlled within the limits of 10 to 10 watts/sq. inch for these preferred alloys. The sweep rate of the electron beam across the surface of the source material must be fast enough to avoid spattering and the formation of persisting liquid phase, but slow enough to effect the evaporation from the source. The sweep rate can range from about to 3,600 linear inches/min. A preferred range of power density and sweep rate for multiple alloy sources of the above named preferred group of metals is within the range of 10 to 10 watts/sq. inch power density, and when the power density is 2 X 10 watts/sq. inch, the sweep rate should be about 100 linear inches per minute. Stated in terms of exposure time or electron beam residence interval, the travel of the beam will be such that the beam will impinge upon any given point on the source material surface from about one three-hundredth second to about one twelve-thousandth second. Thus the beam may be moved back and forth along a line across the source material surface impinging upon a given point tens or even hundreds of times every second and each time cause heating, melting, evaporation and refreezing of the melt residue. Alternatively, the beam may be moved to define a raster-like pattern across the source material surface so that the interval between beam exposures at any given point on that surface is considerably longer.

In general, the multiple element source in the from of an ingot or similar bulk body is placed in a vacuum chamber within the path of an electron beam and the chamber is evacuated to a pressure between 2 X 10' to 4 X 10 torr in order to avoid electric arcing in the beam gun. It is preferable to evaporate in a chamber where the pressure is below 10 torr in order to minimize gas phase collisions between the evaporating atoms from the source and the residual gas atoms in the chamber. Thus, the lower the pressure in the chamber, the better, but for reasons of economy a vacuum of l X 10 torr is preferred.

According to the invention, a uniform coating is produced wherein the variation in composition of the resulting film at any point throughout its volume is less than i 5 percent from that of the nominal composition of the source.

By other methods of the prior art such as conventional evaporation using a stationary source, variations in nominal composition as high as i- 50 percent are frequently observed, and in no case can one achieve, reproducibly over extended periods of time, a variation of less than i 10 percent by such prior art methods. Likewise, the traveling beam technique of the prior art has not proven to be the answer to the problem solved by this invention, the molten pool or residue formed and maintained in such an operation resulting in variations in nominal composition of the order of at least i 10 percent.

The following typical examples demonstrate the beneficial results of the method of the present invention.

EXAMPLE 1 A vacuum melted ingot was prepared containing (nominally, by weight) 70Co-25Cr-4Al-1Y. A section cut from the ingot and serving as the source was placed in a water-cooled copper crucible in a vacuum chamber exhausted to a vacuum between torr and 10 torr. An electron beam of about 0.005 inch diameter giving an energy intensity of about 10 watts/in. was employed, using a Hamilton Standard electron beam welder, model Wl-l provided with, GE beam deflection coils for controlling the beam sweep in X and Y directions in various desired sweep patterns to permit concentrated focusing. A beam power of about 120 KV and about 2ma was used, and the beam was swept back and forth across the source of 60 cycles/sec. along a line on the surface about one-half inch long. A film of about 2000 A. thick was deposited in about 20 seconds on a glass coupon three-fourths inch by three-fourths inch which was positioned about 4 inches from the alloy source. The alloy source was onehalf inch by three-fourths inch by one-eighth inch, cut from the above described vacuum-melted ingot. The relative chemical composition of the resulting film deposited was measured by X-ray fluorescence technique and is listed in Table I. Also listed for comparison purposes, is the X-ray fluorescence analysis of a sample of the bulk material which was cut from the original ingot, as well as the analysis of a film deposited by conventional electron beam evaporation from a source cut from the same original ingot. The conventional evaporation was performed using a stationary beam of somewhat lower intensity, namely at a power of 17 KV and l 10 ma, giving an estimated energy intensity 10 watts/in.

TABLE I Comparison of Relative Compositions of Deposited Films from 70Co-25Cr-4AHY Source The comparative analyses in Table I above, as well as in Table II, was by X-ray fluorescence analysis, expressed as:

Counts per sec/2cm of element/Total counts per sec/2cm and is used as a relative comparison, not equivalent to weight percent nor an absolute quantitative analysis, but does give an indication for comparison purposes.

From the above data in Table I, it is seen that the films deposited by method 1 are relatively closer in composition to the bulk source alloy. It is particularly relevant that the highly volatile element chromium in the films deposited in accordance with the invention are much closer to the composition of the original bulk source alloy than was the film deposited by conventional technique using a stationary beam for the evaporation.

EXAMPLE [I A section of a cast ingot (about one-fourth inch thick by 2 1/16 inch diameter), containing, by weight, percent Ni and 20 percent Cr was mounted on a watercooled copper pedestal. A beam power of 0.67 KW (122 KV, 5.5 ma) was used to evaporate the material from the source. The moving beam was swept across the surface of the specimen in a moving circle about three-fourths inch diameter at a rate of 40 rpm instead of along a straight line, as in Example 1. Initially the beam spot size was about one-eighth inch diameter, which made the beam intensity 5.5 X 10 watts/inf. At seven minutes into the run, the spot size was focused to about 0.002 inches diameter, making the beam intensity about 2 X 10" watts/m A series of films were deposited on glass coupons at intervals, ranging from about 2,000A to about 8,000A in film thickness. The composition of these films was analyzed, using the X-ray fluorescence technique, as in Table I, to give a relative indication. A comparison of the results shows that the high power density moving beam achieved a deposited film much closer in composition to the bulk source alloy.

TABLE II Comparison of Relative Compositions of Deposited Films from 20Cr-80Ni Source (stationary beam) It will be noted that Table II as well as Table I shows that the high powered intensity moving beam causes a film to be deposited which is closer in composition to that of the bulk source alloys than the film deposited by the conventional evaporation process using a stationary electron beam. In both Example I and Example II, the highly volatile constituent occurs in the film at a composition which deviates much less from the desired bulk composition as compared to the film produced by the conventional evaporation method.

Thus, the two compared methods of evaporation in each example demonstrate clearly that the composition of the deposit made from the high intensity evaporation and moving electron beam conforms more nearly to that of the bulk source alloy than a comparable film deposited by conventional evaporation with a stationary beam.

Those skilled in the art will understand that the concept of this invention constitutes a basic departure from prior art practice, particularly in respect to the fact that no lasting or persisting liquid phase is produced or established at any time during the vacuum evaporating and depositing operations. As indicated above the diameter of the focussed electron beam on the bulk body source material surface is relatively small, being from about two mils to five mils (i.e., 0.002 0.005 inch) so that only a very small fraction of the beam travel course over the bulk body surface is exposed to the beam at any one time. Heating, melting and evaporation, as well as refreezing of any unevaporated melt, are a sequence of virtually milli-second events which take place at each point of impingement of the beam with the bulk body surface. Thus, at each successive point of impingement, a superficial portion of the bulk body is melted and part (possibly one-half) of the melt is evaporated before the beam moves to the next successive points of impingement. Refreezing of the melt residue is virtually instantaneous and in any event so rapid as to preclude diffusion of source material constituents into the meILSurprisingly, such melting and evaporating and'refreezing can be caused to occur in the same small area of the bulk body surface over 100 times per second so that there is no persisting melt but evaporation is continuous throughout the deposition process.

What we claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the United States is:

1. The method of vacuum evaporating and depositing on the surface of a turbine engine metal part a multielement protective coating of substantially the composition of a single metallic alloy source, which comprises thesteps of cutting a section from an ingot of said alloy and placing the ingot section in a chamber evacuated to a pressure of to 10 torr, sweeping a focused electron beam of power density from 10 to 10 watts per square inch back and forth across the surface of the ingot section at 60 cycles per second along a line on' the ingot section surface one-half inch long, and exposing the turbine engine part to the combined evaporated components.

2. The method of claim 1 in which the alloy source has a nominal composition of 70Co-25Cr-4Al-1Y, and in which the electron beam is operated at an intensity of about 10 watts per square inch.

3. The method of vacuum evaporating and depositing on the surface of a turbine engine part a multi-element protective coating of substantially the composition of a single metallic alloy source which comprises the steps of providing a bulk body of said alloy in a chamber evacuated to a pressure less than 10' torr, continuously heating and evaporating alloy from the bulk body by sweeping an electron beam across the surface of the body. at a rate such that the residence interval of the beam at each successive point of impingement of the beam on the body surface is less than one-three hundredth of a second and causing at each said successive impingement point the melting of a superficial portion of the bulk body and the evaporation of part of the resulting melt under the electron beam followed by freezing of melt residue of that superficial portion as the beam moves to the next successive points of impingement with the bulk body surface, and exposing the turbine engine part to the combined evaporated components of the said alloy.

4. The method of claim 3 in which the power density of the electron beam is from 10 to 10" watts per square inch.

5. The method of claim 3 in which the alloy of the bulk is of at least two elements selected from the group consisting of iron, cobalt, nickel, chromium, aluminum, yttrium and silicon.

6. The method of claim 3 in which the diameter of the electron beam at the bulk body surface is between 0.002 and 0.005 inch.

7. The method of claim 3 in which the electron beam is swept across the bulk body surface in a raster-like pattern.

8. The method of claim 3 in which the residence interval of the electron beam is from one-three hundredth second to one-twelve thousandth second.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2932588 *Jun 22, 1956Apr 12, 1960English Electric Valve Co LtdMethods of manufacturing thin films of refractory dielectric materials
US3432335 *Jul 19, 1966Mar 11, 1969Lokomotivbau ElektrotechCyclically moving electron beam for uniform vapor deposited coating
US3485997 *Nov 25, 1966Dec 23, 1969Balzers Patent Beteilig AgProcess and apparatus for the thermal vaporization of mixtures of substances in a vacuum
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4011982 *Sep 15, 1975Mar 15, 1977Airco, Inc.Surface joining by bonding of metal and deposited metal
US4563262 *Feb 23, 1982Jan 7, 1986Sablev Leonid PConsumable cathode for electric-arc metal vaporizer
US5458754Apr 15, 1994Oct 17, 1995Multi-Arc Scientific CoatingsPlasma enhancement apparatus and method for physical vapor deposition
US5750185 *Apr 29, 1996May 12, 1998Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V.Method for electron beam deposition of multicomponent evaporants
US6042878 *Dec 31, 1996Mar 28, 2000General Electric CompanyMethod for depositing a ceramic coating
US6139964Jun 6, 1995Oct 31, 2000Multi-Arc Inc.Plasma enhancement apparatus and method for physical vapor deposition
US6284691Jan 26, 2000Sep 4, 2001General Electric CompanyYttria-stabilized zirconia feed material
US6946034 *Aug 19, 2003Sep 20, 2005General Electric CompanyElectron beam physical vapor deposition apparatus
US6977088Feb 26, 2001Dec 20, 2005Muenzel MartinMethod for pest control and for producing low-concentration phosphine air mixtures and device for carrying out a method of this type
US7591057Apr 12, 2005Sep 22, 2009General Electric CompanyMethod of repairing spline and seal teeth of a mated component
US7687151Apr 12, 2005Mar 30, 2010General Electric CompanyOverlay for repairing spline and seal teeth of a mated component
US20060102597 *Nov 16, 2004May 18, 2006Exponent, Inc.Electron beam welding method and apparatus using controlled volumetric heating
US20060225263 *Apr 12, 2005Oct 12, 2006General Electric CompanyMethod of repairing spline and seal teeth of a mated component
US20060228573 *Apr 12, 2005Oct 12, 2006General Electric CompanyOverlay for repairing spline and seal teeth of a mated component
EP0418905A2 *Sep 21, 1990Mar 27, 1991Dornier Luftfahrt GmbhCorrosion- and friction-resistance coatings
EP0418905A3 *Sep 21, 1990Apr 15, 1992Dornier Luftfahrt GmbhCorrosion- and friction-resistance coatings
Classifications
U.S. Classification427/293, 118/726, 219/121.15
International ClassificationC23C14/16, C23C14/28, C23C14/30
Cooperative ClassificationC23C14/16, C23C14/30
European ClassificationC23C14/16, C23C14/30