Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3855842 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateDec 24, 1974
Filing dateMay 16, 1973
Priority dateMay 24, 1972
Publication numberUS 3855842 A, US 3855842A, US-A-3855842, US3855842 A, US3855842A
InventorsJ Imabori, T Kuzuoka, A Mori
Original AssigneeSumitomo Rubber Ind
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Apparatus for testing golf clubs
US 3855842 A
An apparatus for testing the dynamic performance of a golf club by simulating human golf swings including an arm driven by a first motor for simulating the rotation of the golfer's arms about his body and a club holder driven by a second motor for simulating the rotation of the golfer's wrists about his arms. The arm and club holder may be driven independently.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

ite States [111 3,855,842 1451 Dec. 24, 1974 Imabori et al.

[ APPARATUS FOR TESTING GOLF CLUBS [75] Inventors: Junpei imabori, Nishinomiya;

Takeshi Kuzuoka,'l(obe; Atsuhiko Mori, Osaka, all of Japan [73] Assignee: Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.,

Kobe-shi, Kyogo, Japan [22] Filed: May 16, 1973 [21] Appl. No.: 361,005

[30] Foreign Application Priority Data May 24, 1972 Japan 47-51351 [52] US. Cl. 73/13 7 3/432 SD [51] Int. Cl. "L G0lm 3/00 [58] Field of Search... 73/432 SD, 65, 13;

273/186 A; 35/29 A;v

[56] References Cited, v

UNITED STATES PATENTS 2/1929 Mesple 35/29 A ShubertW, 73/13 FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 39 ,123 8/1933 Great Britain 35/29 A OTHER PUBLICATIONS S. W. Herwald, Fundamentals of Servomechanisms How to Select and Apply Them, June 1946, 7 pages.

Primary Examiner-Richard C. Queisser Assistant ExaminerAnthony V. Ciarlante Attorney, Agent, or FirmSughrue, Rothwell, Mion, Zinn & Macpeak 57] ABSTRACT An'apparatus for testing the dynamic performance of a golf club by simulating human golf swings including an arm driven by a first motor for simulating'the rotation of the golfers arms about his body and a club holder driven by a second motor for simulating the rotation of the golfers wrists about his arms. The arm and club holder may be driven independently.

2 Claims, 10 Drawing Figures PAIENIED 3.855.842 SHEEIIILFQ ANGLE OF ROTATION PATEM 052241974 3,855,842 sum 3 95 '3 FIG. 8


5 30 C E"-.- R E B r I 8 FIG. I0

I PROGRAMME-D i-PO'SITION "*1 (9)-SlGNAL SWING l J CLOCKrPULSE v 1 POTENTIOMETER j PROGRAMMED SIGNAL POSITION T INPUT GENERATOR ERV Y T M CLUB APPARATUS FOR TESTING GOLF CLUBS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to an apparatus for testing the dynamic characteristics of a golf club by swinging of the golf club in a manner simulating swing patterns of human golf players.

2. Description of the Prior Art It is necessary in designing golf clubs for higher quality to test the dynamic efficiency or a property of a golf club which is appropriate for a particular swing form or pattern. This is because there are so many swing patterns among different golf players. For test purposes, absolutely identical swing patterns should be repeated. However, this requirement cannot be fully met by the human golf players because the reproducibility of a particular swing pattern is poor. Another difficulty resides in that one test player can present only. one swing pattern at the most, and as such it is impossible to attain a variety of swing patterns.

SUMMARY or THE INVENTION According to the present invention, the difficulties encountered in testing golf clubs are eliminated, and a wide variety of swing patterns simulating those of human players are automatically obtained withcomplete and exact reproducibility.

Swinging motion, more specifically the downswing, of a golf club is composed of two motions: one is a rotational motion performed by a player in a plane inclined relative to the horizontal and including an over-head position in which the club-head is over the players head with his body fully wound up and a hitting position in which the club-head just approaches-impact with the golf ball with the players body uncoiled. The other motion is also a rotational motion performed in the above plane concurrently with the former motion but its center of rotation is located at the moving wrists of the player. The apparatus according to the invention correctly simulates and puts the above two rotational motions into effect.

The main feature of the present invention resides in an apparatus for testing the dynamic efficiency of a golf club comprising an arm portion and a club-grip holder both adapted to firmly hold the grip of a golf club and to swing independently of each other with respect to a relatively stationary main body so that the golf club is caused to experience the composed swinging motion with respect to the two differentcenters of rotation; and driving means responsive to an electric control signal for effecting the independent swinging motions of the arm portion and of the club-grip holder.

The apparatus according to the invention is thus composed of a mechanical portion adapted to set a golf club and to cause the same to swing, and of an electric control portion adapted to effect the swinging motion of the golf club in a fashion to simulate a variety of swing patterns of human golf players.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an apparatus for testing dynamic characteristics of a golf club according to the invention.

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view taken along the line AA of FIG. I.

FIG. 3 is an enlarged perspective view of an embodiment of a golf club grip holder as used in the apparatus of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is an explanatory view showing analyzed swing angles of a golf club when a human player makes a downswing of the club.

FIG. 5 shows characteristic curves of the swing angles of FIG. 4 which are plotted against time during the time interval between the initiation of the downswing and the instant of impart with a golf ball. I

FIG. 6 is a block diagram showing a programmed signal generator used with a mechanical portion of the apparatus of FIG. I. I

FIG. 7. is similar to FIG. 6 but shows a displacement servo system as used-with the signal generator of FIG. 6.

FIG. 8 is a graph showing the waveforms occuring in certain portions of FIG. 6.

FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram of the poteneiometer shown in FIG. 7. potentiometer FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the electric control portion of the invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT member 19 which is threaded for locking the position of the apparatus. A tilting handle 8 is mounted on the upper end of the supporting post 9 and is manually turned for controlling the inclination of the motor casing 7 with respect to the horizontal. 7

Turning now to FIG. 2, two electric motors M and M are installed within the motor casing 7.Two pulleys 14 and 15 are rotatably mounted on shaft 21 driven by the motor M, and an arm portion 5 is secured to the extending end of shaft 21. The pulleys 14 and 15 may be preferably integral or coupled with each other so as to rotate simultaneously. A pulley 13 is secured to a shaft 27 driven by the motor M 1 A club-grip holder 4 and a pulley 12 are secured respectively to a shaft 22 on the outside and inside of a casing 6 of the arm portion 5. Two endless belts 17 and 16 are respectively between pulleys l3 and 15 and between pulleys 14 and'12.

With this construction, the driving force of the motor M is delivered from the pulley 13 through the pulleys 15 and 14 to the pulley 12, thus rotating the shaft 22. This rotational motion is then applied to the grip holder 4 and accordingly to a golf club which includes a grip portion 3, shaft portion 2 and head portion 1. The golf club is fastened in advance to the grip holder 4. The

club is caused to swing about the shaft 22 which corresponds to the center of rotation of the players wrists. The driving force of the motor M is directly delivered to the arm portion 5 through the shaft 21, which corresponds to the center of rotation of the players body. Thus, the golf club can swing with the two centers of rotation independent of each other. Therefore, it will be easily understood that a variety of desired swing patterns, correctly simulating those of human players, are

obtainable if the motors M M are properly controlled.

As shown in FIG. 3, the grip holder 4 is composed of two similar plates 24 respectively having a groove of semicircular cross-section sized to receive the grip portion 3 of the golf club-After having interposed the grip portion 3 between the grooves, the mating plates 24 are clamped by a suitable locking means such as a plurality of bolts 23.

The operation of the mechanical portion of the apparatus is electrically controlled by an electric control portion in a manner as will be explained in the following. In order to attain a wide variety of swing patterns correctly simulating those of human golf players, the rotation of the motor M should closely simulate the movement of the players wrists, while the rotation of the motor M should closely simulate the swinging motion of a golf club with respect to the moving wrists.

For these simulating purposes, the movement of the wrists or arms and the swinging motion of the club both during the downswing are diagrammatically analyzed in a manner as shown in FIG. 4. Here, let it be assumed that the angles of rotation taken by both of the players arms and of the club relative to the players wrists during a time interval between the initiation of the downswing and the impact of the club head with a golf ball are respectively denoted by 6 and 4). These two angles 6 and d) are converted into electric signals, which in turn are introduced into respective programmed signal generators, one of which is illustrated in FIG. 6. A programmed signal thus produced in a generator as a volt age signal is then delivered to a servo-amplifier, an SCR trigger unit (phase control) and an SCR unit electrically connected to an AC. power source as shown in FIG. 7. The output of the SCR unit is applied to the corresponding motor M, or M to effect the rotational operations in a finely controlled fashion. The controlled rotations of the motors will lead to the swinging motion ofa golf club, as has been described. The swinging motion thus obtained is observed by suitable potentiometers, one of which is shown in FIG. 7. Each potentiometer converts the characteristics of its associated motion into a voltage signal which in turn is fed back to the servo-amplifier and compared there with the programmed signal to produce an error signal which causes the motor to follow the programmed signal. In this way, inconsistency is eliminated between the obtained swinging motion and the simulated motion expected to be obtained in accordance with the input signals corresponding to the angles and d).

A programmed signal generator, as shown in FIG. 6, can preset a desired angle of rotation in terms of electric potentials (E E E;,, E, E which are determined by resistance levels of a potentiometer corresponding to a number of segments of the time interval as previously defined. The preset potentials are then applied in consecutive order of the segmental time intervals so that a stepped waveform resembling a desired curve (see FIG. which indicates the angle of rota-. tion plotted against time during the downswing, may be obtained. With reference to FIG. 6, more specifically, a stepped waveform signal is transmitted into an auto matic tangent determining circuit, formed by the subtraction integrator and sample-and-hold circuit, to produce a tangential waveform resembling the particular curve.

FIg. 8 illustrates the waveforms present at points A, B, C and D in FIG. 6.

Waveform C indicates the value of a prior step of waveform B immediately after a clock pulse. Since the sample and hold circuit samples and holds the value of the waveform c, the value of waveform D is kept constant until the following sample instruction or clock pulse occurs, even if the value of waveform C varies in accordance with the lapse of time. Accordingly, the difference between the inputs B and D in the subtraction integrator is the difference in height of the steps at the preceding and following clock pulses. The slope or tangent of the integrated output C is directly proportional to the difference between B and D, and the value of C equals the value of B immediately before the following clock pulse. Though being constant, the period of the clock pulse is increased twice or ten times for a slowmotion swing. Therefore, the integrating constant of the subtraction integrator may be changed by interlocking it with the change-over switch for slow-motion.

Referring to FIG. 7, the servo-amplifier may preferably be used with a control element of the SCR type, in which the three phase electric energy is supplied from the power source and rectified. With use of this SCR system, the electric control portion can feed a control signal of sufficiently high voltage and of sufficiently high instantaneous electric current to the mechanical portion, especially the motors. However, this SCR system is not necessarily indispensable; other control units using electronic elements such as transistors may be used for rectifying the high three phase electric energy. In order to improve responsiveness of the apparatus, it may be preferable to increase the frequency of the power source. Moreover, the motors may preferably be used with a reduction unit to minimize the resultant inertia.

A detailed description will now be made of the ernbodiment of the present invention in which the SCR control system of FIG. 7 was employed for rectifying the electric energy of the three-phase power source. The power source used was of the type having the maximum voltage of 180 volts, the maximum instantaneous current of amperes, and a frequency of 400 Hz. If, however, a suitable generator is obtainable as the power source, the output frequency may preferably exceed I000 Hz. The motors used were of a minimum inertia type motor, made by Yasukawa Electric Company, Ltd., which was designed to minimize the moment of inertia of the rotor. The motor M, for controlling the angle 6 had the maximum instantaneous torque of 2.5 kg.m and was used in combiantion with a reduction gear unit having a reduction ratio of 1/17. The motor M for controlling the angle 4) had a maximum instantaneous torque of 1.3 kg.m and a reduction gear unit having a reduction ratio of l/ l 1. Since both of the angles 0 and d) were controlled within a range of 200, the feed-back detector used for observing each of the obtaining swing motion was a potentiometer of the type controlled by a single turn of its shaft. The SCR trigger unit was a thyristor gate FS 3G 24-B, made by Nippon Electric Co. The manner in which an SCR unit is triggered relative to the phase of an applied A.C. wave to control the power applied to a motor is well known. The embodiment as described hereinbefore revealed that the apparatus according to the present invention can produce the desired result.

FIG. 9 schematically illustrates one form of potentiometer which may be'used to observe the actual swinging motion of the club.

The motor shaft 21 of arm portion 5 and the motor shaft 22 of the grip holder 4 are respectively coupled directly to the rotating sliding contact 30 of the potentiometer either directly, or indirectly through a non-slip belt, for example. Consequently, the angle of rotation of the slider contact 30 corresponds exactly to that of motor shafts 21 and 2 2.

In the schematic diagram of FIG. 9, a constant voltage E. is applied to the terminals A and B. When the sliding contact connected to output .terminal C traverses the resistance R in accordance with the angle a of rotation of a driving shaft, the resistance value r between terminal B or B and terminal C is directly proportional to the angle Accordingly, the voltage e between terminals C and B becomes e r/R X E; i.e. voltage e is proportional I to the angle a; or as applied to this invention, the voltage e is proportional to the rotating angle 6 of the shaft 21 or arm portion 5 or to the rotating angle 11) of the shaft 22 of the club-grip holder 4.

FIG. is a block diagram illustrating the manner in which the proportional signal generators (FIG. 6) and the SCR control systems (FIG. 7) are interconnected to form the complete electriccontrol portion of the invention.

Since the apparatus of the invention employs programmed signals for controlling the operations of the mechanical portion, the change of the swing angles during the time interval of the downswing can be set more freely within its maximum angular displacement and acceleration than in the conventional automatic testing apparatus of a purely machanical type. Moreover, the swing angle change can be easily performed by turning a set dial, thus providing for a wide variety of programmed swing patterns. The electric control portion of the apparatus is supplied with voltage signals dictated by the programmed angle changes during the time interval, and includes so-called displacement servo systems in which the resultant angular displacements of the golf club closely follow the commanding voltage signals. As a result, the programming can be carried out without any complicated calculation, and as such a servo system is considerably better than a conventional pneumatic servo system which is very complicated. It should be understood that the source of driving force is not limited to the DC. motor as used in the example but may be a hydraulic pressure motor controlled by an electric signal. In addition, the apparatus of the invention may desirably be used with a photoelectric pick-up device which is positioned in the vicinity of the impact point of a golf ball so as to detect and record the velocities of a golf club and the ball both at the instant of the impact.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

We claim:

.1. An apparatus for testing dynamic characteristics of a golf club, said apparatus comprising:

ond program signals to said first and second drive I means, respectively, whereby said drive means are controlled independently of each other by said program signals so that a plurality of golf club swing patterns may be simulated by the combination of independent operations of I said first and second drive means.

2. The apparatus as set forth in claim 1 wherein each of said first and second drive means comprises:

a. potentiometer means coupled to the associated drive means for producing a position signal indicative. of the actual angle of rotation of the drive means; and

b. servo-amplifier means for receiving and comparing corresponding program and position signals to produce an error signal which causes the drive means to assume the actual position called for by the.

value of the program signal.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1703403 *Oct 3, 1927Feb 26, 1929Mesple John LMechanical figure for teaching golf
US3444729 *Oct 21, 1966May 20, 1969Samuel M ShobertGolf club swinging apparatus
GB396123A * Title not available
Non-Patent Citations
1 *S. W. Herwald, Fundamentals of Servomechanisms How to Select and Apply Them, June 1946, 7 pages.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4062222 *Nov 12, 1976Dec 13, 1977Karsten SolheimGolf club swinging apparatus
US4175440 *Aug 10, 1978Nov 27, 1979Booth W JesseApparatus for dynamically testing golf clubs
US4375887 *May 9, 1979Mar 8, 1983Acushnet CompanyMethod of matching golfer with golf ball, golf club, or style of play
US4996867 *Mar 29, 1989Mar 5, 1991Toshiaki MiyamaeGolf club swinging apparatus
US5390534 *May 7, 1993Feb 21, 1995Lisco, Inc.Impact testing device
US5589628 *Dec 19, 1995Dec 31, 1996Pga TourGolf ball striking device
US5696312 *Nov 13, 1995Dec 9, 1997Brigham Young UniversityAccelerated impact testing apparatus
US5739411 *Dec 17, 1996Apr 14, 1998Callaway Golf CompanyAccelerated impact testing apparatus
US5763761 *Feb 22, 1996Jun 9, 1998Eugene R. ParenteBall striking apparatus
US5908979 *Dec 5, 1997Jun 1, 1999Miyamae; ToshiakiGolf ball test hitter
US6250168 *Mar 24, 1999Jun 26, 2001D'aguanno FrankMethod and apparatus for locating the strongest point on a golf club shaft
US6415671 *Feb 9, 2001Jul 9, 2002Kun-Lin ChienPneumatic golf club testing machine
US6755072 *Sep 1, 1999Jun 29, 2004Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd.Ball-batting implement testing device
US6854170Oct 2, 2000Feb 15, 2005D & T Golf VenturesMethod and apparatus for removing a golf club head from a golf club shaft
US8418536 *Sep 17, 2010Apr 16, 2013Miyamae Co., Ltd.Golf club testing machine
US9463572 *Sep 11, 2012Oct 11, 2016Eugene R. ParenteSystem for remotely swinging a golf club
US9675857 *Apr 11, 2014Jun 13, 2017Kevin RyanApparatus for testing a golf club
US20080058127 *Aug 29, 2007Mar 6, 2008Oliver SmithMulti-axis athletic training device
US20110067507 *Sep 17, 2010Mar 24, 2011Miyamae Co., Ltd.Golf Club Testing Machine
US20110195803 *Sep 13, 2010Aug 11, 2011Oliver Pierce SmithMulti-axis athletic training device
US20140074425 *Sep 11, 2012Mar 13, 2014Eugene R. ParenteSystem for remotely swinging a golf club
US20160067572 *Apr 11, 2014Mar 10, 2016Kevin RyanApparatus for testing a golf club
CN104661712A *Sep 10, 2013May 27, 2015尤金R派伦特System for remotely swinging a golf club
WO2014043055A1 *Sep 10, 2013Mar 20, 2014Parente Eugene RSystem for remotely swinging a golf club
U.S. Classification73/11.1, 73/12.4, 73/865.3, 73/12.2
International ClassificationG01M99/00, A63B53/00, A63B69/40, A63B47/00, G01N3/00, G01M1/10, G01N33/00
Cooperative ClassificationG01N2033/008, G01N3/00, G01M99/00
European ClassificationG01M99/00, G01N3/00