|Publication number||US3875068 A|
|Publication date||Apr 1, 1975|
|Filing date||Feb 20, 1973|
|Priority date||Feb 20, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3875068 A, US 3875068A, US-A-3875068, US3875068 A, US3875068A|
|Inventors||James W Mitzel|
|Original Assignee||Tegal Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (57), Classifications (21), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 1 Mitzel 1 GASEOUS PLASMA REACTION APPARATUS  Inventor: James W. Mitzel, Richmond, Calif.
 Assignee: Tegal Corporation, Richmond,
22 Filed: Feb. 20, 1913 211 App]. No.: 333,880
 11.8. C1 250/531, 204/164, 250/542  Int. Cl. H01t 19/00, B01k 3/00  Field of Search 204/164, 165, 193, 195 R,
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,619,403 11/1971 Gorin 250/531 3,687,832 8/1972 Fydelor et a1 1. 250/542 3,775,621 11/1973 Gorin 250/531 Primary Examiner-F. Edmundson Attorney, Agent, or FirmDavid E. Newhouse 1 1 Apr. 1, 1975 [57} ABSTRACT A low-temperature, gaseous, plasma reaction apparatus is described in which the reaction vessel is formed by two coaxially nested cylindrical chambers. A gas is introduced into the vessel and ionized by an RF. electromagnetic field inductively coupled to the gas within the vessel by an exciter coil around the outer chamher. The inner chamber defines a central reaction region and is designed to optimize both the flow and distribution of gaseous ions around a non-gaseous specimen disposed in that region for efficient and uniform reaction therewith. The inner vessel is adapted to be removed from the outer vessel to thereby allow modular processing of non-gaseous specimens. The coaxial configuration of the dual chamber reaction vessel re duces contamination in the reaction region, provides means for conveniently and precisely positioning nongaseous samples in the reaction region, and circumvents devitrification problems.
31 Claims, 8 Drawing Figures GASEOUS PLASMA REACTION APPARATUS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The invention relates to a low temperature gaseous plasma reactor apparatus. More particularly, the invention relates to a highly efficient gaseous plasma reaction vessel, which provides for uniform flow and distri bution of gaseous ions around a non-gaseous material for reaction therewith.
2. Prior Art The number of applications for low temperature gaseous plasma is increasing. For example, in fields of analytical chemistry, such low temperature gaseous plasmas are used for the following purposes: ashing organic materials at low temperatures; structural and chemical phase analysis of solid substances; low temperature pyrolyses; specimen pre-concentration; trace material analysis and gas-phase or gas/solid studies. In the biomedical field, gaseous plasmas are used for preparing solid samples for electron and optical microscopic examination; investigation of cell biology and structure and micro-incineration of specimens at low temperatures. Such gaseous plasmas are also extremely useful in fabrication and processing of electronic components; e.g., stripping photo-resist from etching and cleaning surfaces of semiconductor elements. Such gaseous plasmas are also used for preparing bonding surfaces and for cleaning optical surfaces.
Gaseous plasma chemistry techniques involve basically the following steps and apparatus: A material or specimen is placed in a sample boat" which is loaded into a reaction chamber. The chamber is evacuated to a mild vacuum (approximately 1 Torr) by a mechanical vacuum pump. A carrier gas such as oxygen is drawn through the chamber and over the sample. Radiofrequency power is applied (usually 13.56 MHz) to excite the carrier gas molecules and change some of them to other species, such as atoms, radicals, ions, and free electrons.
This gaseous plasma is highly reactive and it causes a gentle, low-temperature combustion of the organic materials or impurities in the sample. The combustion products are carried away in the gas stream, leaving the base material for further processing or analysis. By using different gases, highly selective reactions with the sample can be obtained. The gas can be an oxidizing or reducing gas. It can also be chosen for different ratios of RF excited species. Typical gases used are oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, ammonia, helium, argon, and methane.
There are basically three different types of apparatus described in the prior art for carrying out gaseous plas ma-solid chemical reaction. Each type of the prior art apparatus is briefly described below, and its particular defects and disadvantages are pointed out.
The first type of prior art apparatus is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3410776, issued to R. BERSIN. Briefly, the BERSIN apparatus includes a vessel having two chambers connected in an L configuration. A gas, e.g., oxygen, is introduced into one ofthe chambers, i.e., the ionization chamber, and is ionized into a plasma or activated gaseous medium by a RF. electromagnetic field, inductively coupled into the gas by an exciter coil around the ionization chamber. The gaseous plasma flows from the ionization chamber into the reaction or material-handling chamber containing the solid substance. The neutral and active species of the gaseous plasma, as well as the gaseous reaction products from the plasma solid reaction, exhaust from the reaction chamber of the BERSIN apparatus via an exhaust port at the end of the material-handling chamber.
The primary defects of the BERSIN apparatus relate to the distribution of the gas or the plasma in the material-handling chamber. Specifically, because of the L-shaped configuration of the vessel, the plasma is not uniformly distributed in the material-handling chamber; consequently, the plasma-solid reaction cannot occur at a uniform rate, thus making precision processing with the plasma impossible. An extension of the BERSIN apparatus, described in U.S. Pat. No. 3428548, issued to .l. R. HOLLAHAN, improves the distribution of the plasma in the material-handling chamber by providing multiple ionization chambers. However, the HOLLAHAN apparatus has relatively high power requirements in that a plurality of inductive exciter coils must be driven by a single R.F. generator. For that reason the generator must also be relatively sophisticated. Finally, if the HOLLAHAN apparatus is to be used around other sensitive electronic devices, the exciter coils must be extensively shielded.
A description of the second type of plasma-solid reaction apparatus can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3547802, issued to C. E. GLEIT, et a1. Briefly, the GLEIT apparatus, comprises a single tubular vessel with smoothly curved end sections. An inductive R. F. exciter coil is wound around a linear portion of the tu bular vessel for generating a gaseous plasma. A solid materials receiving section is located in the linear portion of the tube just downstream from the exciter coil. A gas is introduced into the vessel at one of the curved ends and exits out the opposite curved end.
The primary defects of the GLEIT apparatus relate to its configuration. Specifically, the long tubular vessel must be decoupled from its end sections before a solid specimen can be placed in the vessel. Then, the vessel must be re-connected to its end section, evacuate and the plasma excited. Secondly, the gaseous plasma, once generated, will have an axial density gradient induced by gas flow through the vessel. Hence, the upstream end of the solid sample will react at a different rate than the downstream end. Furthermore, a solid specimen, must be held by an independent boat-structure near the central axis of the tube. Accordingly, the sample essentially acts as a stopper or a baffle which greatly disrupts the flow and the uniformity of the gaseous plasma down the tube. To minimize the baffle or the stopper effect, the relative diameter of the solid specimen must be small as compared to the diameter of the vessel. Accordingly, the tubular GLEIT apparatus is simply not suited for handling bulky solids, such as biological specimens and the like. It is equally obvious, that the GLEIT apparatus does not lend itself to modular processing of solid samples. Finally, because of the variability and non-uniformity of the plasma distribution in the tube induced by the sample, the GLEIT apparatus is not suitable for precision processing samples with gaseous plasmas.
A description of the third type of prior art apparatus can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3619403 issued to G. .l. GORIN. The GORIN apparatus includes a cylindrical reaction vessel with two or more small-diameter gasinlet tubes, positioned symetrically around the periphery inside the vessel. Each of the gas-inlet tubes is closed at one end with a series of holes along its respective length. The other end of each tube is connected to a gas-inlet port through the reaction-vessel wall. One end of the reaction vessel is adapted to be removed to provide a material-handling port for inserting and removing solid substances. An exhaust port is centrally located through the opposite end of the chamber. An inductive R.F. exciter coil, connected to a conventional R.F. generator, is wound around the vessel for ionizing the gas.
The primary defects of the GORIN apparatus relate to the location of the exhaust port. Specifically, as the gas enters the chamber via the inlet tubes, it flows preferentially towards that port. Accordingly, the distribution of the plasma ions in the chamber is not uniform either in an axial direction or in a radial direction. In addition, because of the numerous gas-inlet tubes and the centrally located exhaust port, there is a relatively large mass flow of gas through the chamber of the GORIN apparatus. Accordingly, the GORIN apparatus requires a substantial amount of RF. energy to maintain the proper ion-density level in the chamber.
Still another defect of the GORIN apparatus relates to the vacuum seal, disposed between the chamber and the closure lid. Specifically, the seal is exposed to the plasma and, therefore, is a source of contamination in the chamber.
From the above descriptions of the prior art plasma/- solid reaction devices, it is apparent that they can not provide a uniform distribution of ions in the reaction chamber. Moreover, the reaction vessels of prior art devices do not include any internal structure for positioning or holding solid specimens in the reaction region of the chamber. Accordingly, separate structures, such as boats or racks holding the solid specimens must be slid into and out of the chamber manually. Such structures materially affect the distribution of the plasma and the reaction region of the vessels. Moreover, because such structures must be manually positioned in the chamber, it is practically impossible to expose two identical specimens to an identical plasm region within the vessel. Finally, the walls of the reaction vessel are often scratched by the boats. Such scratches serve as initiation sites for devitrification of the glass walls of the chamber. In particular the reaction chamber of each of the prior art apparatus is a single-wall vessel, usually composed of glass or other transparent mediums to allow the radiation energy to escape from the plasma. Devitrification results from the combined effect of atmospheric pressure; the R.F. field and a defect such as a scratch of the vessel wall, which causes the glass in the region of the defect to transform from an amorphous or glassy state to a crystalline state and become opaque. The opaque region then absorbs energy radiating from the plasma, heats up and liquefies, whereupon the pressure differential across the vessel wall causes a hole to form. In such instances, the entire reaction vessel must be replaced. The replacement of the reaction vessels can become expensive, especially where the vessel is a complicated structure, such as that described in the GORIN patent.
Still another drawback of the single vessel configuration as taught by the prior art is that the reaction products from the plasma/solid reaction often deposit on the interior walls of the reaction vessel. Such deposits are not easily removed because the chamber cannot be easily disengaged from the rest of the reaction apparatus for cleaning. This factor greatly limits the utility of the prior art devices because deposits from one plasma/solid reaction are often contaminents to another such reaction.
More importantly, the prior art apparatus have not been extensively utilized for processing sensitive semiconductor elements, e.g., metal-oxide-silicon (MOS) devices, because the elements, after being treated in the apparatus, developed instabilities. Specifically, when, for example, MOS devices are placed in prior art apparatus, a surface charge builds up. This surface charge creates an electric field across the device inducing drift. The subsequent instability in the MOS devices are directly attributable to that drift which occurs while the device was in the apparatus.
Another drawback of the prior art plasma/solid reaction apparatus relates to reacting a gaseous plasma with a powdered solid specimen. Specifically, due to the unimpeded exhaust ports, such powder specimens tend to blow around the chamber as it is evacuated or as the chamber is re-pressurized for removal of the reaction products. Accordingly, the prior devices require bleed valves and the like to slow evacuation and re-pressurization of the chamber, thereby greatly increasing the time for processing such powdered samples, or resultant powdered or delicate solid residues.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In accordance with the teachings of the present invention, a gaseous plasma/solid reaction apparatus is provided wherein the distribution of gaseous ions and activated gaseous species in a central reaction region is controlled by controlling the flow of gas from that region. Such a flow-control is implemented by appropriately porting an inner chamber defining a reaction re gion. Such porting can take into account the shape of the non-gaseous substance reacting with the plasma, as well as any structures holding the substance in plasma. Accordingly, highly precise and efficient processing of the non-gaseous materials with a gaseous plasma is made possible.
More particularly, in accordance with the present invention, a reaction vessel for conducting precision, gaseous plasma/solid chemical reactions is formed by two coaxially cylindrical chambers, each having an open and a closed end. A gas is introduced and distributed in the vessel via a plurality of small diameter finger tubes, each with a series of holes along its respective length and projecting through the end wall of the outer chamber, into a central reaction region, defined by the inner chamber. The inner chamber is appropriately ported to optimize the flow and distribution of gaseous ions in the reaction region around a non-gaseous material for efficient and uniform reaction therewith. Neutral and active species of the gaseous plasma, together with the gaseous reaction products, exit from the central reaction region, into an annular exhaust region, defined between the two nested cylindrical chambers. An exhaust port for removing gas from the vessel is located near the open end of the outer chamber and thus is operatively isolated from the central reaction region by the inner chamber wall.
In addition, the inner chamber includes the structural means integral therewith for positioning non-gaseous substances in the central reaction region so that repeatable precision reactions can be conducted. The inner vessel also serves as a shield and as a collector of contaminants to thereby reduce contamination in the central reaction region. Accordingly, the invented apparatus, provides means for better quality control over the gaseous plasma/solid reactions.
Still another advantage of the invented apparatus relates to the interchangeability of the inner chambers; in particular, each apparatus can include a plurality of inner chambers, each specifically designed to perform either different or identical functions. Accordingly, because of the interchangeability of the inner chambers, the invented apparatus is substantially more versatile than those devices described and taught in the prior art.
Moreover, the present invention makes a modular processing of solid samples with a series of gaseous plasmas possible. For example, a non-gaseous specimen can be loaded into a single cylindrical inner chamber. The inner chamber can then be inserted into a first outer outer chamber to form a first reaction vessel for treating the specimen at a first station with a gaseous plasma. The inner chamber can then be removed from the first outer chamber carrying the specimen therewith and inserted into a second outer chamber to form a second reaction vessel for treating the specimen with a second gaseous plasma reaction, and so on. Such a process can be carried out without directly handling the specimen.
An important advantage of the invented vessel configurations is that it minimizes the build-up of a surface charge on the specimens being processed. Accordingly, very sensitive semiconductor elements, e.g., MOS, devices can be processed in the chamber without fear of inducing an instability.
Still another advantage of the invented apparatus relates to the elimination devitrification failure of the reaction vessel. Specifically, the reaction vessel is provided by two coaxially nested cylindrical chambers, the inner chamber carrying the sample. Accordingly, the probability of scratching the outer chamber is greatly decreased, and if the inner chamber deteriorates due to devitrification, it can be easily removed and replaced. However, such an event is unlikely since the side walls of the inner vessel are not subject to atmospheric pressure.
The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the instant invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment of the invention, together with the accompanying figures.
DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of the invented gas reaction apparatus.
FIG. 2 is a view along line AA of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus wherein the inner chamber has means for introducing a gas.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus with a rack holding silicon wafer samples disposed within the inner chamber of the apparatus.
FIG. 5 is a view along line BB of the apparatus shown in FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus with a sample boat containing a planar sample disposed within the inner chamber of the apparatus.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram showing a method for sequentially treating samples with the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus.
FIG. 8 is a line diagram showing the different regions within the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus.
DISCLOSURE OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring to FIGS. 1, 2, and 8, the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus generally designated by the number 10, includes an outer vessel, 12, of a generally cylindrical cup-like configuration having an end wall, 14, while being open at the opposite end. The cylindrical walls of the outer vessel 12 terminate in a raised annular shoulder, 16, having a flat or planar cross-section. An inner vessel, 20, also of a generally cylindrical cuplike configuration, having an end wall 22, while being open at the opposite end, has a lesser diametric dimension than the outer vessel 12. The inner vessel 20 is adapted to fit within the outer vessel 21 in a nested coaxial relationship. The inner vessel 20 has a series of outlet ports, 42, along its axial length.
More particularly, with reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, the outlet ports, 42, comprise slots having a predetermined circumferential length and axial width. As shown in FIG. I, the ports, 42, are located through the downward side wall of the inner vessel 20 and are re gularly spaced axially along its length. It should be noted that the configuration, the location, the circumferential length, the axial width, and the location of the ports, 42, through the walls of the inner vessel 20 may be varied in different inner vessels, to implement desired operational behavior as will be more fully discussed infra.
The end wall 22 of the inner vessel 20 is planar and has a slightly greater diametric dimension than the outer vessel 12. An anular seal 18 is disposed around the outside surface of the inner vessel 20 in an abutting relationship with the raised shoulder 24 integrally provided by the end wall 22 ofthe inner vessel 20. Accordingly, when the inner vessel 20 is coaxially inserted within the outer vessel 12 the respective shoulders 16 and 24 abutt hermetically against the seal 18 to form an evacuatable chamber 26.
A port, 28, for exhausting the chamber 26 is located through the wall of the outer vessel 12 proximate its open end. The port 28 basically comprises a cylindrical receptacle 30 extending downward from the wall of the outer vessel 12 with a tubular port means 32 connected to a vacuum source 34, extending from the side wall thereof. Accordingly, the exhaust port is multifunctional in that in addition to serving as an exhaust port it also traps unwanted contaminates from the vacuum source as well as acting as a baffle to minimize and disrupt large scale currents in the chamber 26 as it is evacuated or re-pressurized.
Reactant gaseous species are introduced into the chamber 26 via a plurality of finger tubes, 36, projecting through and fused with the end wall I4 of the outer vessel 12. The finger tubes, 36, are closed at the end proximate the opened end of the outer vessel 12 and have a series of holes, 38, generally oriented in a downward direction regularly spaced along their respective lengths. The opened ends, 44, of the finger tubes, 36, are connected to a gas source, 40, by appropriate valving and tubing means as are well known in the art.
A conductive coil is helically wound around the outside cylindrical wall of the outer chamber 12. The coil, 44, is connected to a suitable radio frequency genera tor 46 such that the chamber 26 is surrounded with a resonant circuit adapted to couple a radio frequency electromagnetic field to the reactant gasses within the chamber 26. In particular, the coil 44 inductively couples radio frequency electromagnetic energy (usually 13.56 MHz) to the reactant gaseous molecules to convert some of them to such species as atoms, radicals, ions, and free electrons, or in other words, to convert the reactant gaseous species into a gaseous plasma.
The invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus design optimizes the volume of the chamber 26, the design and parameters of the chamber 26 and the gas flow through the chamber 26 such that the load between the RF. generator 46 and the chamber 26 is balanced. Accordingly, it is possible to minimize the R.F. power requirements and to simplify the electronics which form the radio frequency generator 46 according to principles and teachings well known in the art.
Referring now in particular to FIG. 8, when the inner vessel is coaxially inserted into the outer vessel 12, the resultant evacuatable chamber 26 has three regions: an entrant region 48 within the finger tube 36; a central reaction region 50 defined by the inner cylindrical walls of the inner vessel 20; and an annular exhaust region 52 between the cylindrical walls of the inner and outer vessels 20 and 12 respectively. The finger tubes 36 project into the upper portion of the central reaction region 50 proximate the inner cylindrical wall of the inner vessel 20. Gaseous reactant species flow into the entrant region 48 within the finger tube 36 and are slightly ionized by the radio frequency fields inductively coupled into the interior of the chamber 26 by the helical coil 44, due to the flow rate within the entrant region 48. The gaseous reactant species then flow out of the entrant region 48 via the holes 38 through the finger tube 36 into the central reaction region wherein they are ionized into a gaseous plasma.
The density and distribution of the gaseous plasma in the central reaction region is highly uniform. In explanation. deleterious local electromagnetic field effects due to the helical induction coil 44 are minimized as will be discussed later. In addition, the gaseous plasma flows both in an axial direction as signified by the arrow 54 and in a radial or diametric direction as signified by the arrow 56.
More specifically, the central reaction region 50 communicates with the annular exhaust region 52 via the porting 42 through the walls of the inner vessel 20 and through an annular exhaust port 58 defined between the opened end of the inner vessel 20 ad the closed end wall 14 of the outer vessel. The crosssectional dimension 'T of the exhaust annulus 58 can be varied by varying the thickness, T, of the annular seal 18. by increasing the cross-sectional dimension, T, of the annular exhaust port 58 the rate of axial flow in the central region, 50, can be increased. Similarly, by increasing the cross-sectional dimension T the axial flow rate can be decreased. In addition, the flow ofthe gaseous plasma in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the central reaction region 50 can be regulated by appropriately porting the vessel wall of the inner chamber 20. Specifically, to increase the rate of radial flow, one merely increases the cross-sectional area of the ports 42. As shown in FIG. 8, the ports 42 are located through the downside of the inner vessel wall such that gas will flow perpendicular to the axis of the central reaction region 50 in a more or less straight line fashion from the holes 38 through the finger tubes 36.
In summary, the distribution of the gaseous plasma in the central reaction region 50 is controlled by controlling the flow of the plasma from that region. The insulative walls of the inner vessel 20 define the central reaction region 50. The flow of the gaseous plasma is controlled by appropriately porting that inner chamber. Such porting, as should be recognized by those skilled in the art, can take into account the particular shapes of non-gaseous samples and substances placed in the central reaction region 50, as well as any structures such as boats and racks holding such substances in that region. Accordingly, highly precise and efficient processing of non-gaseous matericals with a gaseous plasma is made possible.
As the gaseous plasma leaves the central reaction region 50 via the exhaust port described above, it enters the annular exhaust region 52. The plasma flows in an opposite axial direction in the annular exhaust region than it does in the central region. Accordingly, disruptions in the volumetric distribution of the gaseous plasma in the central region due to electromagnetic field effects caused by the flowing gaseous plasma medium are minimized. In addition, the plasma ions species in the exhaust region 52 form a coaxial conductive sheath which effectively isolates the central reaction region 50 from the localized field effects of the helical induction coil 44 wound around the outside wall of the outer vessel 12.
More specifically, the gaseous plasma in the annular exhaust region 52 phenomenologically functions as a secondary oscillator, which inductively couples the radio frequency electromagnetic field, driving it into the central reaction region. Specifically, the cylindrical walls of the inner vessel is an insulative material, e.g., glass or quartz. Hence, the outer annulus 52 is electronically isolated from the central reaction region 50. Localized field effects induced by the helical coil wound around the outside wall of the outer vessel 12 are only seen by the gaseous plasma in that annular exhaust region. Then, since the plasma in that region is basically a uniform conductive coaxial body, it inductively couples the electromagnetic field driving it uniformly into the cylindrical central reaction region 50 which it surrounds. In effect, the exhaust annulus serves to buffer and eliminate deleterious field effects due to the essentially localized coupling of an RF. field into the chamber 26 with a conductive helical coil.
For these and many other reasons which should be obvious to those skilled in the gaseous plasma, physical science, and electronic arts, the central reaction region 50 of the invented apparatus is an ideal region in which higly precise and very sensitive experiments, processes and other such operations with a gaseous plasma can be conducted. It is believed by the inventor and others that the explanation for the absence of a surface charge on semi-conductor elements, e.g., MOS devices, processed in the invented gaseous plasma apparatus is due in large part to the idealized environment within the central reaction region 50.
Moreover, the highly uniform distribution and density of the gaseous plasma in the central reaction region has been observed. Specifically, the inventor placed a thin aluminum wafer, coated with a photo-resist material on both sides, in the central reaction region and then visually observed the oxidation of the photo-resist material by a gaseous oxygen plasma. He noted that the photo-resist material disappeared simultaneously from the respective surfaces of the aluminum wafer. Moreover, they noted that the photo-resist material uniformly oxidized, in that no islands and the like of photo-resist material existed while the photo-resist material was being oxidized. The only explanation for such phenomenon was that the gaseous plasma within the central reaction region was extremely uniform in its distribution and density.
Referring now to FIG. 3, the versatility of the in vented plasma reaction apparatus is evident. Specifically, as shown in FIG. 3, the inner vessel 20 includes a third finger tube 60 projecting through and fused with its end wall 22. The finger tube 60 is closed at its distal end and has a series of holes through its walls along its length. The tube 60 may lie either in the same plane as the finger tubes 36 projecting through the back wall of the outer vessel 12 or along any circular cord between the finger tubes 36, in order to preserve axial symmetry. The finger tube 60 is adapted to be connected to a second gas source (not shown in the figure).
Sequential processes can be conducted on the solid specimens with apparatus shown in FIG. 3. Specifically, a first reaction on such a solid specimen can be conducted with a first reactant gas introduced into the chamber 26 via the finger tubes 36. After the first reaction has progressed to completion, the chamber is isolated from the first gas source, 40, by an appropriate valve and the first reactant gas species and reaction products are evacuated from the chamber 26 via the exhaust port 28 connected to the vacuum source 34. After the first reaction species have been evacuated from the chamber a second reactant gaseous species can be introduced into the chamber via the finger tube 60 to initiate a second gaseous plasma reaction with the solid sample. While the second reaction progresses, a third gas source can be connected to the finger tubes 36 by conventional means well recognized by those skilled in the art. After the second gaseous plasma reaction has progressed to completion, the second gas source can be isolated bia a valving means whereupon the chamber will again be evacuated of all gaseous species. A third gaseous plasma reaction process can be initiated by introducing the gas from the third source. Accordingly, by repeating the above sequential steps many times, a large number of processes can be expeditiously and efficiently carried out on a solid specimen with a single gaseous plasma reaction apparatus.
Referring now to FIGS. 4 and 5, a rack 62 carrying a plurality of semi-conductor wafers 64, is disposed within the inner vessel 20 in the central reaction region 50 of the invented apparatus 10. Such racks 62 are typically composed of quartz or other such non-reactive substances. The legs, 66, of the rack, 64, rest on parallel ledges, 68, longitudinally disposed along the lower wall portion of the inner vessel and fused therewith. The ledges include a stop, 70, such that the racks can be precisely positioned in the inner vessel, 20, before the inner vessel is inserted into the outer vessel 12. Such positioning means for the rack, 52, makes possible high quality control over the gaseous reaction process occurring within the central reaction region 50.
Referring now to FIG. 6, a quartz boat 72 is shown placed within the inner vessel 20 of the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus. The boat contains a filter, 74, which is to be oxidized or reduced by a gaseous plasma. In this instance, the inner walls of the inner vessel 20 do not have precise positioning means in that such are not necessary. Moreover, as shown in FIG. 6, the ports, 42, through the vessel wall have not been altered to accomodate or to adjust for the blockage due to the quartz boat 72. However, as should be obvious to those skilled in the art, it would be an easy matter to appropriately port an inner vessel 20 such that the flow of gaseous plasma out of the central reaction region would be optimal for reacting with samples disposed within a solid reaction boat placed within the inner vessel 20.
Referring now to the diagram shown in FIG. 7, the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus makes possible sequential treatment of a single specimen with a plurality of chambers 76. Specifically, a plurality of solid samples (not shown) can be loaded into a plurality of inner vessels, 78. A first vessel, 78', containing its solid specimen is inserted into the first chamber 76A. The chamber is then evacuated to soft vacuum pressures and the sample processed with a gaseous plasma. The chamber is then re-pressurized, the inner vessel, 78', removed therefrom and inserted into the second chamber 768, whereupon that chamber is evacuated and a second gaseous plasma reaction conducted on the solid specimen within the chamber 78'. As shown by the arrows 80 in FIG. 7, each inner vessel carrying its respective solid sample can be cycled through any number ofchamber stations 76 in a sequential fashion.
The process utilizing a single inner vessel 78 and a plurality of chamber stations, 76, for processing solid specimens with a sequence of gaseous plasma reactions is particularly adapted for high speed processing with different gaseous plasmas wherein:
(I) the reaction gaseous species of a prior process would be a contaminant in a subsequent gaseous plasma process; (2) the reaction gaseous species of a subsequent process are incompatible with prior gaseous reaction species.
Referring now back to FIGS. I and 2, the inner vessel 20 also serves a a baffle to prevent blow-off of powdered specimens when the chamber 26 is evacuated or re-pressurized. Specifically, the cylindrical wall of the inner vessel 20 isolates the exhaust port 28 from the central reaction region. Accordingly, bleed valves and other such devices slow the rate of evacuation and/or re-pressurization of the chamber 26 can be eliminated.
More importantly, referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the inner vessel shields the central reaction region from contaminants. Specifically, products of any reactions of the gaseous plasma with the seal 18 which is exposed to the gaseous plasma are confined in the annular exhaust region 52. Moreover, the cylindrical wall of the inner vessel shields the central reaction region from contaminants originating from the vacuum source or from associated vacuum piping such as the vapors of oils lubricating the vacuum pump and the like. Finally, the cylindrical wall of the inner vessel serves as a collector of reaction products of gaseous plasma-solid reactions which deposit or precipitate on surfaces proximate to the reaction. Accordingly, it is not necessary to clean the outer vessel as frequently as must be done with the prior art apparatus.
Finally, because the outer vessel rarely comes into contact with specimens, boats, racks and other such devices which might scratch its surface, the vessel 12 rarely fails because of devitrification. Moreover, devitrification failure of the inner vessel 20 will not signifi cantly disrupt or otherwise affect the gaseous plasma reaction occurring within the central reaction region 50. In effect, such devitrification failure may only create an additional port through which the gaseous plasma can exhaust into the annular exhaust region 52.
Finally. the inner and outer vessels, 20 and 12 respectively, as well as the finger tubes, should be composed of transparent insulative medium such as pyrex glass or quartz. The mediums should be transparent to allow the radiations from the excited gaseous plasma to escape from the inner chamber region. The mediums should be insulative to allow the radio frequency field to be inductively coupled into the gaseous reactant spe- Specifications for an exemplary embodiment of the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus Controls and meters: Lighted AC Power switch; vacuum control switch; RF power switch; RF tuning control; RF meter calibrated in watts.
R.F. power: O-lOO Watts, continuously variable at l3.56 MHz, crystal controlled.
R.F. Transfer network: Variable capacitor optimized RF power transfer to plasma load; power amplifier direct coupled to reaction chamber through matched high impedance network.
Chamber: Removable inner chamber, 3% inch lD X inch IL, sealed by silicone gasket and vacuum pumpdown; Pyrex standard, quartz optional.
Dimensions: l l inches wide X 9% inches high X inches long; weight, pounds.
Facilities required: Mechanical vacuum pump, 50 liters per minute; 115 volts AC, 60 Hz, l5 amps peak line power; gas flow regulator with O to 10 PSIG adjustment.
While the invented gaseous plasma reaction apparatus is described with respect to exemplary, representative and schematic embodiments, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous variations and modifications can be effected within the scope and spirit of the invention as described hereinabove and as defined and set forth in the appended claims.
What is claimed is:
l. A gaseous plasma reaction apparatus comprising in combination:
a reaction chamber having means for introducing and removing non-gaseous materials;
means for introducing and distributing a gas into said reaction chamber;
means for ionizing the gas in the reaction chamber into a plasma;
means for controlling the flow and distribution of said plasma with said reaction chamber;
means for minimizing local electromegnetic field ef fects on said plasama within said chamber comprises in combination:
an outer vessel of a generally symetrical configuration composed of an insulative material;
an inner vessel of a generally similar symetrical configuration as said outer vessel also composed of an insulative material and disposed in a nested symetrical relationship within said outer vessel, the interior of said inner vessel defining said reaction chamber;
a shell zone surrounding said reaction chamber defined by the interior wall of said outer vessel and the exterior wall of said inner vessel, containing a conductive gaseous plasma; and
means for withdrawing gas from said reaction chamber.
2. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 1 further defined in that said means for ionizing the gas includes a radio frequency generator means having an output coupled to a resonant circuit surrounding said reaction chamber.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 further defined in that said resonant circuit surrounding said reaction chamber comprises a conductive coil disposed around said outer vessel adapted to inductively coupled a R.F. electromagnetic field resonantly into said reaction chamher.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 further defined in that said inner vessel has a port whereby said gas and said plasma exhausts from said reaction chamber into said shell zone and in that said means for withdrawing gas from said chamber is connected to an exhaust port defined through the wall of said outer vessel.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 further defined in that said inner vessel has a plurality of ports symetrically located around and through said inner vessel wall.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 further defined in that said inner and outer vessels have a generally cylindrical configuration, and said conductive coil has a helical configuration.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 further defined in that said means for controlling the flow and distribution of said plasma within said chamber further comprises in combination means for directing plasma flow within said reaction chamber.
8. The gaseous plasma reaction apparatus of claim 7 further defined in that said outer vessel has a generally cylindrical cup-like configuration having an open and closed end;
and in that said inner vessel has a generally cylindrical cup-like configuration having an open and closed end, said inner vessel being coaxially inserted through said open end and into said outer vessel, and having a raised annular shoulder of greater diametric dimension than said outer vessel such that said shoulder abutts against walls defining said open end of said outer vessel; and hermetic seal disposed between said open end of said outer vessel and said shoulder of said inner vessel, composed of relatively inert resilient materials of the class consisting of plastics and silicone rubbers, whereby a hermetic chamber is formed having means for introducing and removing nongaseous materials therefrom; and
integral structural means within said inner vessel for receiving, positioning and holding said non-gaseous materials in such reaction chamber for reaction with said plasma.
9. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 8 further defined in that said exhaust port communicating through the wall of said outer vessel is located proximate said open end of said outer vessel and means are connected to said exhaust port for evacuating gas from said hermetic chamber.
10. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 9 further defined in that said means for introducing and distributing a gas within said closed chamber comprises a plurality of tubes extending from the closed end of said outer vessel through the opened end of said inner vessel proximate to the interior wall of said inner vessel, each of said tubes having a plurality of holes along their respective lengths each tube being integrally connected to a corresponding gas inlet port defined through said closed end of said outer vessel.
11. The apparatus as defined in claim further defined in that said tubes are symetrically disposed about the interior wall of said inner vessel and have an outer diameter which is small with respect to the inner diameter of said inner vessel.
12. A plasma reaction apparatus comprising in combination',
an outer vessel of a generally cylindrical cup-like configuration having an open and closed end; an inner vessel of a generally cylindrical cup-like configuration having an open end, a closed end and a raised annular shoulder on its exterior surface proximate the closed end, said inner vessel being coaxially inserted within said outer vessel through said open end thereof whereby said shoulder abuts against the walls defining said open end of said outer vessel to thereby form a closed chamber;
means for making a hermetic seal disposed between said open end of said outer vessel and said shoulder of said inner vessel;
means for introducing and distributing a gas in said closed chamber;
means for ionizing the gas in said chamber into a plasma;
means for controlling the flow and distribution of said plasma within said chamber; and
means for withdrawing gas from said chamber.
13. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 12 fur ther defined in that said means for ionizing the gas includes a radio frequency generator means having an output coupled to a resonant circuit surrounding said chamber.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 further defined in that said resonant circuit surrounding said chamber comprises a conductive coil disposed around said outer vessel adapted to inductively coupled a RF. electromagnetic field resonantly into said chamber.
15. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 14 further defined in that said means for introducing and distributing a gas within said closed chamber comprises a plurality of tubes extending from the closed end of said outer vessel through the open end of said inner vessel proximate to the interior wall of said inner vessel, each of said tubes having a plurality of holes along their respective lengths, each tube being integrally connected to a corresponding gas inlet port defined through said closed end of said outer vessel.
16. The apparatus as defined in claim 15 further delined in that said tubes are symetrically disposed about the interior wall of said inner vessel and have an outer diameter which is small with respect to the inner diameter of said inner vessel.
17. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 15 further defined in that said means for withdrawing gas from said closed chamber comprises an exhaust port communicating through the wall of said outer vessel proximate said open end of said outer vessel and means connected to said exhaust port for evacuating gas from said chamber.
18. The plasma reaction apparatus of claim 17 wherein said means for introducing and distributing a gas within said closed chamber further comprises a plurality of tubes extending from the closed end of said inner vessel proximate the interior walls of said inner vessel, each of said tubes having a plurality of holes along their respective lengths and each tube being integrally connected to a corresponding gas inlet port defined through said closed end of said inner vessel.
19. The apparatus as defined in claim 18 wherein said tubes extending from the end wall of said inner vessel are symetrically disposed around the interior wall of said inner vessel and have an outer diameter which is small with respect to the inner diameter of said inner vessel.
20. The apparatus of claim 17 further defined in that the walls of said inner vessel define a central reaction region of a generally cylindrical shape; and in that the interior wall of said outer vessel and the exterior wall of said inner vessel define an exhaust region of a generally annular configuration and an orifice of a generally annular configuration between the open end of said inner vessel and the closed end of said outer vessel to thereby induce said plasma to flow axially in said cylindrical reaction region; exhaust from that region via said orifice into said exhaust region, and flow in the opposite axial direction to said exhaust port.
21. The apparatus of claim 20 further defined in that said means for controlling the flow and distribution of said plasma within the chamber includes means for regulating the cross sectional area of said annular orifice whereby axial flow rate of said plasma in the central reaction region is controlled.
22. The apparatus of claim 21 further defined in that said means for making an hermetic seal between said opened end of said outer vessel and said shoulder of said inner vessel comprises an annular gasket.
23. The apparatus of claim 22 further defined in that said means for regulating the cross sectional area of said annular orifice comprises a plurality of annular gaskets, each having a different thickness and each adapted to be disposed between said opened end of said outer vessel and the raised annular shoulder of said inner vessel whereby the thickness of each gasket determines the linear distance between said open end of said inner vessel and said closed end of said outer vessel.
24. The apparatus of claim 23 further defined in that said means for controlling the flow and distribution of said plasma within the chamber further comprises a plurality of ports defined through the cylindrical wall of said inner chamber whereby said plasma exhausts from said central reaction region into said exhaust region via said ports.
25. The apparatus of claim 24 further defined in that said ports are located through the wall of said inner vessel so as to also insure plasma flow in said central reaction region in a generally perpendicular direction with respect to the longitudinal axis of said central reaction region.
26. The apparatus of claim 25 further defined in that said plurality of gas inlet tubes are located generally on one side of said central reaction region and said ports are located on a generally opposite side of said central reaction region from said gas inlet tubes.
27. The apparatus of claim 26 further defined in that said ports comprised slots defined through the walls of said inner vessel generally oriented perpendicularly with respect to the longitudinal axis of said central reaction region, each slot having a particular circumferential length and width whereby the flow and distribution of said plasma within said central reaction region are controlled.
28. The apparatus of claim 27 further defined in that said slots are located in a cooperative relationship with the holes through said inlet tubes and with said nongaseous material disposed within the central reaction region to provide a uniform and homogeneous flow of gaseous plasma around the surface of said material whereby said material uniformly reacts with said gaseous plasma.
29. The apparatus of claim 28 further defined in that said inner vessel includes integral structural means within its interior for positioning said non-gaseous material in said contral reaction region with said plasma.
30. The apparatus described in claim 17 further delined in that said inner vessel, outer vessel and gas inlet tubes are composed of transparent and insulative materials of the class consisting of quartz and pyrex glass respectively.
31. The apparatus as described in claim 23 further defined in that said annular gaskets are composed of relatively inert resilient materials of the class consisting of plastics and silicon rubber.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3619403 *||Jun 30, 1970||Nov 9, 1971||Lfe Corp||Gas reaction apparatus|
|US3687832 *||Nov 23, 1970||Aug 29, 1972||Surface Activation Corp||Production of improved polymeric materials using electrical gas discharges|
|US3775621 *||Dec 29, 1972||Nov 27, 1973||Lfe Corp||Gas reaction apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4149923 *||Jun 16, 1978||Apr 17, 1979||Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus for the treatment of wafer materials by plasma reaction|
|US4178877 *||Mar 13, 1978||Dec 18, 1979||Fujitsu Limited||Apparatus for plasma treatment of semiconductor materials|
|US4252595 *||Mar 28, 1978||Feb 24, 1981||Tokyo Shibaura Electric Co., Ltd.||Etching apparatus using a plasma|
|US4292153 *||Mar 14, 1980||Sep 29, 1981||Fujitsu Limited||Method for processing substrate materials by means of plasma treatment|
|US4352974 *||Jul 29, 1980||Oct 5, 1982||Hitachi, Ltd.||Plasma etcher having isotropic subchamber with gas outlet for producing uniform etching|
|US4474828 *||Mar 30, 1983||Oct 2, 1984||Sperry Corporation||Method of controlling the supercurrent of a Josephson junction device|
|US4487161 *||Oct 28, 1980||Dec 11, 1984||Vlsi Technology Research Association||Semiconductor device manufacturing unit|
|US4600563 *||Feb 5, 1985||Jul 15, 1986||Psi Star Incorporated||Plasma reactor with voltage transformer|
|US4687560 *||Aug 16, 1985||Aug 18, 1987||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Method of synthesizing a plurality of reactants and producing thin films of electro-optically active transition metal oxides|
|US4711767 *||Apr 30, 1986||Dec 8, 1987||Psi Star||Plasma reactor with voltage transformer|
|US4898715 *||Nov 22, 1988||Feb 6, 1990||Adir Jacob||Process and apparatus for dry sterilization of medical devices and materials|
|US4909995 *||Nov 22, 1988||Mar 20, 1990||Adir Jacob||Process and apparatus for dry sterilization of medical devices and materials|
|US4990229 *||Jun 13, 1989||Feb 5, 1991||Plasma & Materials Technologies, Inc.||High density plasma deposition and etching apparatus|
|US5200158 *||Sep 19, 1991||Apr 6, 1993||Adir Jacob||Process and apparatus for dry sterilization of medical devices and materials|
|US5433780 *||Nov 19, 1993||Jul 18, 1995||Tokyo Electron Limited||Vacuum processing apparatus and exhaust system that prevents particle contamination|
|US5532447 *||Dec 6, 1993||Jul 2, 1996||Aluminum Company Of America||Method of cleaning an aluminum surface by plasma treatment|
|US5537004 *||Apr 29, 1994||Jul 16, 1996||Tokyo Electron Limited||Low frequency electron cyclotron resonance plasma processor|
|US5554223 *||Mar 4, 1994||Sep 10, 1996||Tokyo Electron Limited||Plasma processing apparatus with a rotating electromagnetic field|
|US5698168 *||Nov 1, 1995||Dec 16, 1997||Chorus Corporation||Unibody gas plasma source technology|
|US5944193 *||Jun 27, 1997||Aug 31, 1999||Nec Corporation||Wafer storing system having vessel coating with ozone-proof material and method of storing semiconductor wafer|
|US5962923 *||Aug 7, 1995||Oct 5, 1999||Applied Materials, Inc.||Semiconductor device having a low thermal budget metal filling and planarization of contacts, vias and trenches|
|US5976259 *||Nov 9, 1995||Nov 2, 1999||Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor device, manufacturing method, and system|
|US6045666 *||Nov 24, 1997||Apr 4, 2000||Applied Materials, Inc.||Aluminum hole filling method using ionized metal adhesion layer|
|US6136095 *||Oct 6, 1997||Oct 24, 2000||Applied Materials, Inc.||Apparatus for filling apertures in a film layer on a semiconductor substrate|
|US6204197||Jun 12, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.||Semiconductor device, manufacturing method, and system|
|US6217721||Apr 5, 1996||Apr 17, 2001||Applied Materials, Inc.||Filling narrow apertures and forming interconnects with a metal utilizing a crystallographically oriented liner layer|
|US6238533||Oct 16, 1997||May 29, 2001||Applied Materials, Inc.||Integrated PVD system for aluminum hole filling using ionized metal adhesion layer|
|US6290806 *||Mar 24, 1997||Sep 18, 2001||Micron Technology, Inc.||Plasma reactor|
|US6313027||Oct 6, 1997||Nov 6, 2001||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method for low thermal budget metal filling and planarization of contacts vias and trenches|
|US6413358||Aug 3, 2001||Jul 2, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for improving etch uniformity in remote source plasma reactors with powered wafer chucks|
|US6500300||Apr 25, 2002||Dec 31, 2002||Micron Technology, Inc.||Plasma reactor|
|US6784033||Jan 27, 1995||Aug 31, 2004||Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.||Method for the manufacture of an insulated gate field effect semiconductor device|
|US6946053||Nov 5, 2002||Sep 20, 2005||Micron Technology, Inc.||Plasma reactor|
|US7074714||Nov 3, 2004||Jul 11, 2006||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing a metal seed layer on semiconductor substrates|
|US7253109||Feb 28, 2005||Aug 7, 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing a tantalum nitride/tantalum diffusion barrier layer system|
|US7381639||Jun 9, 2006||Jun 3, 2008||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing a metal seed layer on semiconductor substrates|
|US7687909||Mar 30, 2010||Applied Materials, Inc.||Metal / metal nitride barrier layer for semiconductor device applications|
|US8029105||Oct 4, 2011||Eastman Kodak Company||Ambient plasma treatment of printer components|
|US8398773 *||Mar 19, 2013||Asm International N.V.||Thermal processing furnace and liner for the same|
|US8841607 *||Sep 3, 2012||Sep 23, 2014||Bruker Daltonics, Inc.||Atmospheric pressure ion source with exhaust system|
|US20050020080 *||Aug 18, 2004||Jan 27, 2005||Tony Chiang||Method of depositing a diffusion barrier layer and a metal conductive layer|
|US20050085068 *||Nov 3, 2004||Apr 21, 2005||Tony Chiang||Method of depositing a metal seed layer on semiconductor substrates|
|US20050173376 *||Apr 8, 2005||Aug 11, 2005||Donohoe Kevin G.||Method for etching a wafer in a plasma etch reactor|
|US20050208767 *||Feb 28, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing a tantalum nitride / tantalum diffusion barrier layer system|
|US20050272254 *||Jul 18, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing low resistivity barrier layers for copper interconnects|
|US20070020922 *||Jun 9, 2006||Jan 25, 2007||Tony Chiang||Method of depositing a metal seed layer on semiconductor substrates|
|US20070178682 *||Apr 10, 2007||Aug 2, 2007||Tony Chiang||Damage-free sculptured coating deposition|
|US20070227451 *||Feb 14, 2007||Oct 4, 2007||R3T Gmbh Rapid Reactive Radicals Technology||Device for producing excited and/or ionized particles in a plasma|
|US20070241458 *||May 30, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Applied Materials, Inc.||Metal / metal nitride barrier layer for semiconductor device applications|
|US20090053888 *||Oct 20, 2008||Feb 26, 2009||Applied Materials, Inc.||Method of depositing a diffusion barrier layer which provides an improved interconnect|
|US20120160662 *||May 26, 2010||Jun 28, 2012||Microwaste Limited||Pyrolisis Reactor and Process for Disposal of Waste Materials|
|US20120186573 *||Jul 26, 2012||Jdira Lucian C||Thermal processing furnace and liner for the same|
|DE102004039468A1 *||Aug 14, 2004||Mar 2, 2006||Gschwandtner, Alexander, Dr.phil.||Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung angeregter und/oder ionisierter Teilchen in einem Plasma|
|DE102004039468B4 *||Aug 14, 2004||Sep 25, 2008||R3T Gmbh Rapid Reactive Radicals Technology||Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung angeregter und/oder ionisierter Teilchen in einem Plasma|
|EP0152511A1 *||Feb 23, 1984||Aug 28, 1985||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Apparatus and method for plasma treatment of resin material|
|EP0176295A2 *||Sep 16, 1985||Apr 2, 1986||Randall Mundt||Eliminating unwanted material from a gas flow line|
|WO2015183479A1 *||May 4, 2015||Dec 3, 2015||Applied Materials, Inc.||Apparatus for treating a gas in a conduit|
|U.S. Classification||422/186.5, 422/906, 204/164, 204/298.33, 204/192.32|
|International Classification||B01J12/00, B01J19/12, H05H1/46, B01J3/00|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S422/906, B01J19/129, B01J12/002, B01J2219/0894, B01J3/006, H05H1/46, B01J19/126|
|European Classification||B01J19/12D6, B01J3/00F, B01J12/00B, H05H1/46, B01J19/12D12|
|May 10, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: COAST BUSINESS CREDIT, A DIVISION OF SOUTHERN PACI
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TEGAL CORPORATION;TEGAL JAPAN, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010785/0795
Effective date: 20000414
|Aug 9, 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MOTOROLA, INC., 1303 EAST ALGONQUIN ROAD, SCHAUMBU
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST. EFFECTIVE 12/18/89;ASSIGNOR:TEGAL CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:005439/0781
Effective date: 19891218