Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3881550 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMay 6, 1975
Filing dateMay 24, 1973
Priority dateMay 24, 1973
Also published asCA1016451A, CA1016451A1
Publication numberUS 3881550 A, US 3881550A, US-A-3881550, US3881550 A, US3881550A
InventorsBarry Charles B
Original AssigneeParsons Co Ralph M
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
In situ recovery of hydrocarbons from tar sands
US 3881550 A
Hydrocarbon products from viscous tar sands are recovered by continuously injecting a hot solvent containing relatively large amounts of aromatics into the formation. Alternatively, steam and solvent are cyclically and continuously injected into the formation to recover the values. The last stimulation is by steam so that solvent is recovered. A third alternative is to continuously inject a mixture of steam and solvent vapors and liquid into the formation. In all cases, the solvent, except perhaps for startup, is produced at the site, as in a conventional topping unit, which alternatively is combined with a conventional visbreaking or reforming unit to increase the volume and/or aromaticity of the solvent produced.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent Barry May 6, 1975 [54] IN SITU RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBONS 3,695,354 10/1972 Dilgren et a1. .1 166/272 3,768,559 10/1973 Allen 6161. 166/272 FROM TAR SANDS Charles B. Barry, Houston, Tex.

75 I 1 nvemor Primary Examiner-David H. Brown [73] Assignee: Ralph M. Parsons Company, Attorney, Agent, or FirmChristie, Parker & Hale Pasadena, Calif. [22] Filed: May 24, 1973 ABSTRACT [21] Appl. No.: 363,596 Hydrocarbon products from viscous tar sands are recovered by continuously injecting a hot solvent containing relatively large amounts of aromatics into the [52] 166/272; 166/266; 166/303 formation. Alternatively, steam and solvent are cycli- [51] Int. Cl E21b 43/24 Cally and continuously injected into the formation to [58] held of Search 166/272 266 recover the values. The last stimulation is by steam so that solvent is recovered. A third alternative is to con- [56] References C'ted tinuously inject a mixture of steam and solvent vapors UNITED STATES PATENTS and liquid into the formation. In all cases, the solvent, 3,358,756 12 1967 Vogel 166 272 X except P p for Startup, is Produced at the Sim, as 3,442,332 /1969 Keith 166/272 X in a onventional topping unit, which alternatively is 3,474,863 /1969 Deans et a1. 166/272 X combined with a conventional visbreaking or reform- 3,500,9l0 3/ p t e 166/272 X ing unit to increase the volume and/or aromaticity of 3,528,501 9/1970 Parker 166/272 x the solvent produced 3,593,790 7/1971 Herce 166/272 X 3,608,638 9/1971 Terwilliger 166/272 4 Claims, 3 Drawing Figures mm/c'aww/s ag //0 6X75 -70 FflEL a)? pas/ 2x41 nwM/lr/c /3i- 60A l A/7 '0Mfl47/5ZE aim/5% 575414 5705465 504 VA/f WAt/W ag 42 P800067 52; 9 4754M 5 y /4@ 5021/5/1/7 H M 05 w ,9 vy 0 rep/7:? 247 //4 -52 25552 5562 62% 2241 5 if gjfizf 1e f/flf /4' ya g. a/ gfi tlk EEFM/Zey A Fg/ i'f'flifi- /0@ E5 m J L iii/1232i; 567 5 #2 5 fj%2 P 222267252 A 5 60/65 9 Call/{Hide a 4 g? 1 7 22 8; W511 #640 54 4402 s/m/ 0/4 A 25572? gffiwme i We if!!! w 90 M 847 W 54 8a a; 72mm d /m1 p 72 5AA/0;5Zz/0a POfl Vfl 8 D/siasn g/ i 9&

1.. pwwf/m/ al fafiwfi'd/ A 12 g W/JTER was ww/ I 1- 5754/4 wi/Mr/m/ WAZLQ 92 7Z47 firm/W 2i: 1 flfopaf/fi/t/ //V/Z7V4Z 1 i 1 Aura/wa 1 5754/14 02/1/16 d 1 W IN SITU RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBONS FROM TAR SANDS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates in general to the art of oil recovery and, more in particular. to recovery of hydrocarbons from heavy crudes or bitumens by stimulation.

There are large petroleum deposits in the form of very viscous crudes or bitumens. These deposits may be residuals from naturally developed fields or deposits which have never been produced. An example of very viscous tar deposits is in the Peace River and Athabasca regions of Canada. These tars have a gravity of from 6 to 20 APl, a clean oil viscosity of to 20,000 cps, and an emulsion viscosity of to more than 100,000 cps. The asphaltene content of these deposits is up to 30% and sulfur up to 6%. Because these tars are so viscous, they cannot be recovered by natural techniques and must be stimulated.

Stimulation of petroleum deposits by steam flooding is a known and tested technique. In this type of stimulation, high pressure and temperature steam is injected into injection wells for recovery of petroleum from pro duction wells. During steam stimulation, steam heats a deposit in a steam zone. Values are distilled there and are forced by steam pressure away from the injection wells towards the production wells. Some of the distilled hydrocarbons will condense in the steam zone because of heat loss from the zone to surrounding strata. Some of the distilled hydrocarbons will reach a front between a hot condensate zone and the steam zone and condense there. The driving force of the steam pressure, however, continuously advances the condensed hydrocarbons towards the production wells. The hot condensate Zone itself fronts on a cold water zone more remote from the steam zone. Finally, there is an oil zone bordering the cold water zone which is the formation unaffected by stimulation. in typical steam flooding, the cold water zone is water flooded and oil is removed by this known technique to the water flooding saturation level. The advancement of the hot condensate zone itself stimulates recovery by lowering viscosity of the oil and by thermal expansion of the oil. Within the steam zone, recovery is promoted, in addition to distillation, by the temperature produced agencies of viscosity reduction and formation swelling. Hydrocarbons are usually recovered at the production wells in primarily liquid form. The considerable driving force of the steam flooding technique is ultimately lost when breakthrough occurs at a production well. This is an event where the steam front advances to the production well and steam pressure is largely dissipated in the well. The well becomes a short circuit. After steam stimulation, the usual practice is to produce without stimulation until further stimulation is necessitated or production terminated.

Obviously, in the steam flooding technique distillation plays only a modest role at best for very heavy crudes such as the Peace River bitumens because they do not contain any considerable light values. Consequently, the action of steam in stimulating recovery from deposits such as the Peace River bitumens must be by viscosity reduction from heating, thermal expansion of the formation, and the driving force of the steam. Even then, recovery can be modest because of channeling resulting from othe permeability of the deposits, fractures, and gravity override between the steam and liquid in the hot and cold zones.

lmportantly also, is the effect of even modest distillation on bitumens or tars. With these crudes, the boiling away of lights will cause the residual crude to become so viscous that no further recovery would be possible, even with the viscosity lowering effect of high temperature from the steam.

Consequently, it has been thought that steam drive recovery is limited to deposits with an API gravity of 20 or greater.

Cold solvent stimulation of oil deposits has improved recovery. Solvents can repair organic and inorganic damage, clean deposited asphaltenes and waxes out from around well bores, and lower the viscosity of the hydrocarbons in the deposit by cutting and demulsification. Demulsification reduces the viscosity of the hydrocarbon deposit because emulsion of water-in-oil and oil-in-water have higher viscosities than oil alone. Solvent stimulation also removes asphaltenes from the deposits. Removal of asphaltenes is especially good with aromatics.

The removal of crude oil from the deposit, however, can create a situation where the solubility of remaining asphaltenes is reduced. Remaining asphaltenes precipitate on surfaces of the deposit and block the passage of crude. Accordingly, to prevent asphaltene precipitation and blockage of the deposit, surfactants have been added to maintain the wetability of deposit surfaces, which prevents blockage.

One of the major drawbacks of solvent stimulation is the high cost of solvent. Quite obviously, if the cost of solvent required to produce effective stimulation of a deposit becomes too great, then solvent stimulation cannot be practiced. Heretofore it has been the practice to produce at least most of the solvents away from the stimulation site. This is so especially with aromatic solvents which are very useful in dissolving asphaltenes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides solvent stimulation of hydrocarbon deposits having extremely high viscosities, such as found in the Peace River region of Canada.

In brief, the present invention contemplates the use of a hot solvent generated from product on site to recover hydrocarbon product values from heavy crudes or bitumens. The hot solvent is injected into the deposit and functions to reduce deposit viscosity by demulsifying viscous emulsions of crude-in-water and water-incrude, solvent cutting of crude, and raising the temperature of the crude. The solvent also solubilizes production restricting precipitated waxes and asphaltenes. The solvent can be used to remove scale deposited from produced water, sand deposited around well bores, and drilling and completion damage. The solvent is introduced at a temperature of from about 200 to about 650F. and is preferably depentanized naphtha of up to about an 800F. end point. This naphtha has substantial quantities of aromatics, the aromatics being useful in the dissolving of asphaltenes and waxes. The solvent may be manufactured from recovered bitumen by topping or by a combination of topping with visbreaking or reforming. Surfactants may be added to the solvent to prevent deposition of asphaltenes on deposit formations by keeping surfaces in the formation water wetable. Suitable surfactants are butylamines or mixed alkyl phenols.

The presently preferred embodiment of the present invention contemplates the use of both solvent and steam extraction of hydrocarbon values from tars or bitumens typified by the Peace River deposits. This is done by either injecting steam and solvent vapors and liquids continuously into the formation or by cyclic injection of steam and hot solvent. With steam, thermal reduction in crude viscosity results and reservoir fluids expand. There will be some, though small, distillation of hydrocarbons by the steam from heat and partial pressure reduction. With the decrease in viscosity, gravity drainage is promoted. The steam pressure, say, 1500 p.s.i.a. at injection, will strongly drive crude to wards production wells.

The steam-solvent process retains the production resulting from thermal stimulation of deposits by the steam while eliminating or minimizing production restrictions occasioned by viscous emulsions, precipitated waxes and asphaltenes, scale and sand deposition, and drilling and completion damage.

When steam and solvent are used together, the difficult problem of solvent-crude mixing is not present because the steam is a low viscosity fluid which will rapidly fill all available voids in the reservoir and carry solvent with it. The solvent can then function more completely throughout the formation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a prior art steam driving technique for the recovery of hydrocarbons as it would apply in tar deposits of the Peace River type;

FIG. 2 illustrates schematically steam and solvent recovery of hydrocarbon values in a deposit of the Peace River type; and

FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a plant for the implementation of the process of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT FIG. 1 illustrates schematically a typical steam drive system which has been implemented before the present invention. Its description is helpful is understanding the principles behind the process of the invention.

In the Figure, injection wells are provided through overburden and to and through tar sands 12. The overburden is, say, 2000 feet and the production interval is, say, 100 feet. In the Peace River deposit, the production interval varies from about 50 to about 1000 feet. Production wells 14 are also provided through the overburden and the production interval.

Steam of a quality of 70 to 80% and at a pressure up to about 2500 p.s.i.a. and at about 668F. is injected into the injection wells. A pressure seal in the overburden prevents backflow of this steam from either the injection wells or production wells.

The gravity of the tars or bitumen in the Peace River deposits is from about 6 to about API. The clean oil viscosity is up to about 20,000 cps. In the emulsion, however, the viscosity increases to more than 100,000 cps. The asphaltic content of the Peace River type of tars is up to about 30%. The sulfur content is also high, being up to about 6%. The tar sands may be bottomed by a water Zone indicated at 16.

Steam injected through the injection wells will progress from that well radially toward the production wells. During the steam drive, a steam zone 18 will continuously expand radially away from the steam injection well. Within the steam zone hydrocarbon vapors will be generated, but immobile hydrocarbons will remain. Owing to temperature rise, the deposit will also expand and there will be a reduction in viscosity. A steam front 20 separates a hot condensate zone 22 from the steam zone. Along this front and into the hot condensate zone condensation of hydrocarbon vapors will occur as steam condenses. Within the hot condensate zone, the temperature varies from steam temperature to reservoir temperature. The hot condensate zone, as is the case in the steam zone, progressively increases with time. Reservoir heating in the hot condensate zone is augmented by the latent heat of the steam and condensing hydrocarbon vapors. A cold water zone 24 is ahead of the hot condensate zone and receives some heat from fluids passing into it from the hot condensate zone. The balance of the reservoir indicated at 26 and is at the original reservoir temperature. As will be seen, with a steam drive system alone, no production occurs from this zone because the hydrocarbons are too immobile to be recovered at the original reservoir temperature.

A production mechanism in the steam drive system illustrated in FIG. 1 is the steam distillation of hydrocarbons in the steam zone. The transfer of the heat energy from the steam to the reservoir deposits will thermally expand these deposits which also results in the production of hydrocarbons. The heating of the deposit also reduces viscosity which makes the oil values there more mobile and results in production. The heated by drocarbons will drain by gravity and be recovered at the production wells which may have bottom hole pumps. A driving force from the pressure differential between the injection wells and the production wells will continuously force hydrocarbons towards the latter for recovery.

Prior techniques of steam stimulation also include the so-called huff and puff system. In this system, steam is injected for a considerable period of time into a well without attendant oil production. The injection of steam is eventually stopped and oil production commences with the stimulation by steam improving the production rate from the well for a time. Ultimately, the well may be restimulated or not, depending on economics. This technique is an alternative to that known as the steam drive discussed above.

FIG. 1 also shows a condition which is known as steam breakthrough during steam drive. Steam breakthrough occurs when steam appears at the production wells. The result of this phenomenon is the loss of the driving pressure of the steam and a marked diminution in the efficiency of the system. A second phenomenon is also illustrated in FIG. 1, and that is steam channeling. It will be noted that the steam zone breaks through at a production well along a very short vertical distance. This channeling is the result of gravity override, permeable strata and horizontal fractures in the reservoir. Gravity override results from the different densities of the steam and the condensate, with the latter tending by gravity toward lower depths. When steam breakthrough occurs, economy precludes continued steam injection, for excessive heat is lost to surrounding strata and is vented up the casing of the production well, this notwithstanding continued gravity drainage due to the rise in temperature of hydrocarbon values in the reservoir. Other problems encountered in the steam drive system is the production of extremely viscous emulsions of oil-in-water and water-in-oil. As previously mentioned, emulsion viscosities can exceed l00,000 cps.

The problem of hydrocarbon immobility from excess viscosity is compounded by removal of distillates from the formation by the steam distillation in the steam zone.

The precipitation of waxes and asphaltenes can effectively block recovery of hydrocarbon values and this precipitation can occur when lighter hydrocarbons are taken from the reservoir. Scale deposition from produced water can also reduce recovery. Steaming can also result in sand deposition around well bores with the result that recoveries are adversely affected. Finally, drilling and completion damage adversely affect recovery.

These problems are reduced by the implementation of hot solvent stimulation of the present invention. The solvent is produced at the production site. With reference to FIG. 2, injection wells 28 are formed in the same manner as the injection wells of FIG. 1. Similarly, production wells 30 are formed in the same manner. The overburden and production zones and water zones are the same. In FIG. 2, production of hydrocarbons is effected by the injection of a mixture of steam and solvent vapors and liquid. The solvent is in two phases, that is, both liquid and vapor. Since the steam has a quality of less than 100% a water phase is also present.

An important aspect of the present invention is the manufacture of solvent on site. The solvent should have a relatively low viscosity and a high aeromatic content. An ideal solvent is depentanized naptha having a maximum end point of up to about 800F.

The production mechanism of the FIG. 2 system includes an increase in mobility of the hydrocarbons through viscosity reduction. Viscosity reduction, as in the steam drive system, results from temperature rise. But in addition to the purely thermal effects of viscosity reduction, and important reduction in viscosity will also be the result of solvent cutting or mixing with the hydrocarbons of the reservoir and the demulsification of the extremely viscous emulsions within the reservoir. This production mechanism also results in thermal expansion of the reservoir fluids due to their heating by both the steam and the solvent. The thermal expansion results in the release of hydrocarbons for recovery. The steam-solvent system also recovers values by gravity drainage. The reduction in viscosity and increased mo-.

bility allows hydrocarbon values to drain for recovery. Again there is a driving force because of the pressure differential between the injection fluid at the injection well and the produced fluid at the production well. The steam may act as a solvent carrier to expose a considerable amount of the deposit to the solvent.

Steam channeling will again occur due to the factors previously set forth, gravity override, permeability of strata, and horizontal fractures. However, the steam channeling may be effectively used to disperse solvent throughout the reservoir. This solvent also prevents precipitation of waxes and asphaltenes at the well bores and washes out scale, sand, and drilling and completion damage.

In FIG. 2, a hot vapor zone 32 is illustrated and it has a front with a cold water and solvent Zone 34. The unaffected portion of the reservoir is shown at 36 and it has the originally constituted hydrocarbons at original reservoir temperature. it should be noted that the use of both steam and hot solvent as recovery vehicles results in greater recovery. The hot solvent conditions the deposit for greater thermally induced recovery over that which would result from steam alone.

Initially, with deposits such as in Peace River, about 10 to about 25% of the gross product is recycled as hot solvent, after the solvent is made by the processing steps set out below. As the process continues, the gross product increases because the injected solvent is being recovererd with the crude. It is possible that product solvent will be left over.

The making of the solvent on site is inexpensive and, with surplus product solvent sold with crude, the quality of the crude increases. Solvent purchased for stimulation, say, cyclohexane, is normally much more expensive than the products produced.

in the simultaneous injection of steam and solvent, in general for each barrel of crude produced and removed from the reservoir, there then may be used about 3% barrels of water converted to steam and about onethird barrel of solvent produced. This ratio, however, is no wise limiting and any ratio of steam to solvent may be employed depending on conditions and process economics.

The solvent produced, such as depentanized naptha having a high aromatic content, should be heavy enough to dissolve the heavier hydrocarbons of the bitumen, but not so heavy as to create mobility problems and remain in the formation. The preferred solvent has a boiling point range of from about 200 to about 800F. An acceptable range is from about 200 to about 500F. The solvent must have a high aromatic content to dissolve asphaltenes. Small quantities of non-ionic surfactants may be used with the solvent. These surfactants are useful in maintaining the wetability of the deposit being processed so that precipitated asphaltenes will not prevent recovery.

As was previously mentioned, hot aromatic solvent will break highly viscous emulsions in the reservoir. They also increase crude temperature and, as such, further decrease the viscosity of the crude.

The present invention also contemplates the cyclic introduction of steam and solvent. The steam stimulates in the manner previously described, i.e., primarily by viscosity reduction and formation swelling, resultant gravity drainage, and pressure drive. in the steam zone, distillation of some values will occur. These values form a solvent slug.

After steam termination the solvent is injected hot at from about 200 to about 650F, to stimulate the steam flooded formation by demulsification, solvent cutting and temperature effects. The solvent cleans up the deposit by removing asphaltenes, waxes, sand and the like. With demulsification, solvent cutting and removal of asphaltenes, the residual crude is conditioned for processing again by steam.

As indicated steam is injected first and steam injection continues until breakthrough at a production well. Steam injection is then terminated and hot solvent injection commenced. Solvent injection is continued until the solvent-to-crude ratio is about 1 to 3. Steam is then injected again until breakthrough. Steam is always injected last to recover solvent from the deposit. As an alternative the huff and puff technique may be employed with solvent and steam, or steam followed by hot solvent injected into th well for a period of time during which production is periodically terminated while stimulation occurs.

The present invention also contemplates recovery of hydrocarbons from highly viscous deposits of tars or bitumens by hot solvent stimulation alone. The solvent is injected into the injection wells at a temperature of from about 200 to about 650F. The solvent is produced from recovered crude at the site and is preferably depentanized naphtha having an end point of less than about 800F. The solvent has a high aromatic content for the solubilizing of asphaltenes. The production mechanism is demulsification of oil-in-water and waterin-oil emulsions, solvent cutting of heavy components of the crude, some formation heating, and removal of physical and chemical impediments to production in the formation.

With reference to FIG. 3, a system to implement the present invention is illustrated. Againthere are a series of production wells that may be bottom-hole pumped. These wells are indicated by the single line 40. A series of steam injection wells are provided at 42. A production zone or interval 43 is the same as the previous Figures, that is, it varies from 50 feet to 1000 feet and is very heavy in tars of the type found in the Peace River deposits. The production zone has a fairly thick overburden 44 on it and is bottomed by a water zone 46.

Product from the recovery leaves the deposit as a stream 48 and consists of heavy crude or tar, water and sand. Stream 48 is introduced at the well head into a separator 50. The separation is of the gaseous constituents of the product and steam from liquid product, sand and water. The gaseous constituents are H 5, CO steam and light hydrocarbons and they leave the separator as a stream 52. The well head separator is provided to measure the production streams and also provides a preliminary breakup of emulsions, which may be by known chemical treatment with the addition of heat, if required. Stream S2 is compressed in a compressor 54 and a compressed stream 56 is introduced into a stream 58 from an ernuision breaker 60 to form a new stream 62. The stream from the emulsion breaker contains crude oil. The united, streams enter a topping unit 64, such as a distillation column.

A crude oil, sand and water stream 68 leaves well head separator 50, passes through a pump 72 before entering line 74. The stream 74 is combined with a recycled stream of light hydrocarbons 76 as a diluent to constitute a stream 78 which passes through heater 80 into a desander 82. A sand and sludge stream 84 from the desander goes to disposal. A stream 86 from a desander enters emulsion breaker 60 where the emulsion is further broken. The requisite input for emulsion breaking is indicated by the flow arrow 88. Emulsion breaking may consist of chemical dehydration, chemical-electrical treaters, flotation and skimming, filtration, centrifuging, or a combination of these methods.

Crude oil stream 58 from the emulsion breaker combines with gas stream 56 to form a stream 62 which is introduced into topping unit 64. which may include a visbreaking and/or reforming unit to increase the aromaticity of the solvent produced. I

A water and oil stream 89 leaves the emulsion breaker and is introduced into a flotationcell 90.111 the A flotation cell, air is introduced at S2 and the water and oil are separated. In addition, any residual sand is separated from the water and oil, as indicated by aneg sand stream 94. The separated water stream Q6 from downstream of a valve 134 in line 132. Line 132 goes water may be treated in such a manner as to be suitable for disposal or, alternatively, for makeup water for a steam generator. Alternate streams for these purposes are indicated at and 102, respectively. The oil stream leaving the flotation cell is a recycle stream and it passes by pump 104 for recycling as stream 76.

Sand slurry 94 is pumped to settling ponds where sand will be precipitated and retained water and oil returned to the process plant. Surplus water not required for the sand slurry mix is directed to settling ponds for skimming remaining oil contaminants and for final set-' tling before being returned to a feed water treatment facility of the plant or a water disposal facility.

Water pumped to flotation cell 90 is air injected to cause any remaining oil particles or sediment to float to the surface. These oil particles or sediment are skimmed resulting in very clean water. Water can be further purified by pumping it through diatomaceous earth filters. Water treatment may also include its softening to Zero hardness.

Stream 62 entering topping unit 64 provides on-site generation of solvent for the recovery process. The topping unit may also employ visbreaking and reforming, the latter operations being employed to increase the aromaticity of the solvent and provide, where necessary, a sufficient volume of solvent to recover very heavy tars such as 6 to 8 A.P.l. tars. The products of the topping unit include heavy crude or tar, which leave the topping unit as a stream 106. The generated solvent leaves the topping unit as a stream 108 and goes to a solvent storage facility 110. This solvent is high in aromatic content. The high aromaticity is valuable in removal of asphaltenes from the deposit. A heavy pitch stream 112 from the topping unit provides fuel for a steam generator 114 and/or fired tubular heater 115. Noncondensable gases are taken from the topping unit as a stream 116. These gases can be used as fuel or can be disposed of in any other suitable manner. An excess reflux stream 118 is introduced into stream 76 to provide a diluent for the stream entering emulsion breaker Excess solvent may be taken from solvent storage as a stream 120, or earlier, as product solvent, which may be commingled with the heavy crude as tar or sold separately.

Steam from steam generator 1 14 passes through a line 122 and may be:

a. combined with solvent in the recovery of values relationship with the aromatic solvent pumped through the heat exchanger from storage by a pump 128. The solvent is heated to a temperature of from about 200 to about 650F. The hot aromatic solvent is then introduced through a line and into a line 132 to the injection wells. Steam in the heat exchanger is condensed and the steam condensate stream 138 is used as makeup for the steam generator and is intro duced to the generator in a stream 140.

Another alternative is to introduce the steam and solvent together. This may be done by a line 142 from solvent storage 110 which bypasses heat exchanger 126 and joins line 130 to the injection wells. In this instance a valve 144 in line 130 is closed and a valve 146 in line 142 is open. On the steam side, valve 124 is closed and valve 134 is open. The result is that both steam and solvent pass through line 132 to the injection wells.

For the introduction of steam and solvent in a cycle, valves 124 and 134 are alternately opened and closed on the steam side, and on the solvent side valves 144 and 146 are alternately opened and closed.

The steam generated from generator 114 is at high temperature and pressure and is of a quality substantially lower than 100%, say, 80%. The reason for this quality is that the water can prevent scale buildup in the steam generator and ancillary lines.

The maximum introduction pressure of steam into the formation is set by formation and overburden characteristics and for 2000 feet of overburden will average about l500p.s.i.g. This requires that the steam generator have a maximum working pressure of about 2500 p.s.i.g.

In cases where hot solvent alone is used to stimulate the reservoir the solvent may be heated in a fired tubular heater 115 and this will, in general, be required if the solvent is employed at high introduction temperatures. Fired tubular heater 1 may be used in conjunction with steam heating of the solvent, in most instances steam and/or solvent temperatures should be maximized for maximum stimulation.

While the process has been described in terms of Canadian tar sands, the process of this invention is useful in recovery of carbonaceous values from many other deposits. Tar sands are found in the United States, Venezula and other countries.

The process of this invention may also be employed to recover values from old oil fields which have been depleted by primary production i.e., natural production followed by water flooding. These systems do not recover the tars present. These fields may still contain from 40 to of their original carbonaceous values as tars.

Yet another example are oil and tar deposits in which the crude is too viscous to process by conventional means or which would be uneconomic to process.

What is claimed is:

1. In a process for recovering hydrocarbons from a subterranean deposit of hydrocarbons having high viscosities and including tar sands, oil and tar deposits by stimulation through the injection of a solvent into the deposit, the improvement which comprises:

a. producing a solvent from the recovered hydrocarbons close to the recovery area;

b. heating the produced solvent to an elevated injection temperature of from about 200 to about 650F;

c. injecting the heatedsolvent into the deposit to demulsify hydrocarbon-water emulsions and cut relatively heavy hydrocarbons; and

d. recovering at least a portion of the stimulated hydrocarbons as field-produced values and at least a portion as solvent for injection into the deposit.

2. The improvement claimed in claim 1 wherein the solvent has a high aromatic content for the solubilization of deposit asphaltenes.

3. The improvement claimed in claim 2 wherein the solvent is depentanized naptha having a maximum end point of about 800F.

4. The improvement claimed in claim 3 wherein the solvent has a boiling point range of from about 200 to about 500F.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3358756 *Mar 12, 1965Dec 19, 1967Shell Oil CoMethod for in situ recovery of solid or semi-solid petroleum deposits
US3442332 *Feb 1, 1966May 6, 1969Percival C KeithCombination methods involving the making of gaseous carbon dioxide and its use in crude oil recovery
US3474863 *Jul 28, 1967Oct 28, 1969Shell Oil CoShale oil extraction process
US3500910 *Jan 26, 1967Mar 17, 1970San Miguel Project IncSolvent recovery of petroleum
US3528501 *Aug 4, 1967Sep 15, 1970Phillips Petroleum CoRecovery of oil from oil shale
US3593790 *Jan 2, 1969Jul 20, 1971Shell Oil CoMethod for producing shale oil from an oil shale formation
US3608638 *Dec 23, 1969Sep 28, 1971Gulf Research Development CoHeavy oil recovery method
US3695354 *Mar 30, 1970Oct 3, 1972Shell Oil CoHalogenating extraction of oil from oil shale
US3768559 *Jun 30, 1972Oct 30, 1973Texaco IncOil recovery process utilizing superheated gaseous mixtures
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4007786 *Jul 28, 1975Feb 15, 1977Texaco Inc.Secondary recovery of oil by steam stimulation plus the production of electrical energy and mechanical power
US4022277 *May 19, 1975May 10, 1977The Dow Chemical CompanyIn situ solvent fractionation of bitumens contained in tar sands
US4068716 *Sep 17, 1976Jan 17, 1978Texaco Inc.Oil recovery process utilizing aromatic solvent and steam
US4086960 *Feb 25, 1976May 2, 1978Haynes Charles AApparatus for hydrocarbon recovery from earth strata
US4149597 *Dec 27, 1977Apr 17, 1979Texaco Exploration Canada Ltd.Method for generating steam
US4158638 *Mar 27, 1978Jun 19, 1979Gulf Research & Development CompanyRecovery of oil from oil shale
US4230184 *Dec 1, 1978Oct 28, 1980Shell Oil CompanySulfur extraction method
US4250964 *Nov 15, 1979Feb 17, 1981Gulf Research & Development CompanyProcess for recovering carbonaceous organic material from a subterranean formation
US4271905 *Feb 21, 1979Jun 9, 1981Alberta Oil Sands Technology And Research AuthorityGaseous and solvent additives for steam injection for thermal recovery of bitumen from tar sands
US4280559 *Oct 29, 1979Jul 28, 1981Exxon Production Research CompanyMethod for producing heavy crude
US4310049 *Apr 17, 1979Jan 12, 1982California Institute Of TechnologyCrude oil desulfurization
US4333529 *Aug 29, 1980Jun 8, 1982Wetcom Engineering Ltd.Oil recovery process
US4362213 *Nov 19, 1980Dec 7, 1982Hydrocarbon Research, Inc.Method of in situ oil extraction using hot solvent vapor injection
US4398603 *Jan 7, 1981Aug 16, 1983Hudson's Bay Oil And Gas Company LimitedSteam generation from low quality feedwater
US4407367 *Oct 14, 1980Oct 4, 1983Hri, Inc.Method for in situ recovery of heavy crude oils and tars by hydrocarbon vapor injection
US4461350 *Dec 16, 1981Jul 24, 1984Mobil Oil CorporationThermal solvent recovery method utilizing visbroken produced crude oil
US4465138 *Dec 16, 1981Aug 14, 1984Mobil Oil CorporationCyclic thermal solvent recovery method utilizing visbroken produced crude oil
US4469177 *Nov 29, 1982Sep 4, 1984Mobil Oil CorporationRecovery of viscous oil from asphaltic oil-containing formations
US4475592 *Oct 28, 1982Oct 9, 1984Texaco Canada Inc.In situ recovery process for heavy oil sands
US4519454 *Dec 21, 1983May 28, 1985Mobil Oil CorporationCombined thermal and solvent stimulation
US4531586 *Dec 21, 1983Jul 30, 1985Mobil Oil CorporationMethod of solvent stimulation of heavy oil reservoirs
US4550779 *Mar 6, 1984Nov 5, 1985Zakiewicz Bohdan M DrProcess for the recovery of hydrocarbons for mineral oil deposits
US4884635 *Aug 24, 1988Dec 5, 1989Texaco Canada ResourcesEnhanced oil recovery with a mixture of water and aromatic hydrocarbons
US4930574 *Mar 2, 1987Jun 5, 1990Interatom GmbhMethod for tertiary oil recovery from deep-well drill holes with utilization of the escaping petroleum gas
US4969520 *Jun 26, 1989Nov 13, 1990Mobil Oil CorporationSteam injection process for recovering heavy oil
US6540023 *Mar 27, 2001Apr 1, 2003Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyProcess for producing a diesel fuel stock from bitumen and synthesis gas
US6662872 *Nov 7, 2001Dec 16, 2003Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyCombined steam and vapor extraction process (SAVEX) for in situ bitumen and heavy oil production
US7240739Aug 4, 2004Jul 10, 2007Schlumberger Technology CorporationWell fluid control
US7461693Dec 20, 2005Dec 9, 2008Schlumberger Technology CorporationMethod for extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using electrical energy and critical fluids
US7875120Feb 4, 2008Jan 25, 2011Raytheon CompanyMethod of cleaning an industrial tank using electrical energy and critical fluid
US8096349Dec 20, 2005Jan 17, 2012Schlumberger Technology CorporationApparatus for extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using electrical energy and critical fluids
US8256511 *Jun 18, 2008Sep 4, 2012Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyUse of a heavy petroleum fraction as a drive fluid in the recovery of hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation
US8770289 *Nov 16, 2012Jul 8, 2014Exxonmobil Upstream Research CompanyMethod and system for lifting fluids from a reservoir
US8813846 *Oct 5, 2009Aug 26, 2014The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaHydrocarbon recovery process for fractured reservoirs
US9187979Oct 30, 2008Nov 17, 2015Schlumberger Technology CorporationMethod for extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using electrical energy and critical fluids
US20060027377 *Aug 4, 2004Feb 9, 2006Schlumberger Technology CorporationWell Fluid Control
US20070137852 *Dec 20, 2005Jun 21, 2007Considine Brian CApparatus for extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using electrical energy and critical fluids
US20080163895 *Feb 4, 2008Jul 10, 2008Raytheon CompanyMethod of cleaning an industrial tank using electrical energy and critical fluid
US20090114384 *Oct 30, 2008May 7, 2009Schlumberger Technology CorporationMethod for extraction of hydrocarbon fuels or contaminants using electrical energy and critical fluids
US20100155062 *Jun 18, 2008Jun 24, 2010Boone Thomas JUse Of A Heavy Petroleum Fraction As A Drive Fluid In The Recovery of Hydrocarbons From A Subterranean Formation
US20110174498 *Oct 5, 2009Jul 21, 2011The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaHydrocarbon recovery process for fractured reservoirs
US20130199780 *Dec 19, 2012Aug 8, 2013George R. ScottRecovery from a hydrocarbon reservoir
EP2226131A2Sep 12, 2006Sep 8, 2010Raytheon CompanyMethod of cleaning an industrial tank using electrical energy and critical fluid
WO2010040202A1 *Oct 5, 2009Apr 15, 2010The Governors Of The University Of AlbertaHydrocarbon recovery process for fractured reservoirs
U.S. Classification166/272.6, 166/266
International ClassificationE21B43/16, E21B43/34, E21B43/24, E21B43/40
Cooperative ClassificationE21B43/24, E21B43/40
European ClassificationE21B43/24, E21B43/40