Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3886599 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 3, 1975
Filing dateJul 25, 1974
Priority dateJul 25, 1974
Publication numberUS 3886599 A, US 3886599A, US-A-3886599, US3886599 A, US3886599A
InventorsSchlein Allen P
Original AssigneeSchlein Louis Charles
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Surgically implantable total ankle prosthesis
US 3886599 A
Abstract
An implantable total ankle prosthesis consists of an upper portion formed of highly polished metal having a stem which is firmly attached to a correspondingly shaped slot formed in the tibia, and a lower portion formed of ultra-high density polyethelyne and having a shank shaped to be sunk into a cavity formed in the surface of the body of the talus. The confronting surfaces of the upper and lower portions are both convex, thereby to provide a bi-plane sliding joint having minimal friction and allowing simultaneous rotational movement. The prosthesis is implantable through an anterior or anterior-medial incision, this approach leaving the ligaments on the lateral and medial side of the ankle joint essentially undisturbed so as to preserve the normal medial-lateral stability of the articulation.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

United States Patent 1 i [111 3,886,599

Schlein June 3, 1975 SURGICALLY IMPLANTABLE TOTAL Primary ExaminerRonald L. Frinks ANKLE PROSTHESIS Attorney, Agent, or FirmSpencer E. Olson [75] Inventor: Allen P. Schlein, Stratford, Conn. [73] Assignee: Louis Charles Schlein, Union, NJ. [57] ABSTRACT An implantable total ankle prosthesis consists of an [22] Filed: July 1974 upper portion formed of highly polished metal having [21] Appl. No.: 491,754 a stem which is firmly attached to a correspondingly shaped slot formed in the tibia, and a lower portion formed of ultra-high density polyethelyne and having a shank shaped -to be sunk into a cavity formed in the surface of the body of the talus. The confronting surfaces of the upper and lower portions are both convex, thereby to provide a bi-plane sliding joint having mini- [56] References Cited mal friction and allowing simultaneous rotational UNITED STATES AT movement. The prosthesis is implantable through an 3 521 302 7/1970 anterior or anterior-medial incision, this approach I 3,715,763 2/1973 leaving the ligaments on the lateral and medial side of 3,774,244 1/19 the ankle joint essentially undisturbed so as to pre- 3,839,742 10/ 1974 serve the normal medial-lateral stability of the articulation.

[52] US. Cl. 3/1; 128/92 C [51] Int. Cl. A61f l/24 [58] Field of Search..... 3/1; 128/92 C, 92 CA, 92 R 6 Claims, 6 Drawing Figures SURGICALLY IMPLANTABLE TOTAL ANKLE PROSTHESIS BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Research workers have for many years attempted to find ways to lessen the disability for the patient suffering from degenerative or post traumatic arthritis of the ankle joint, as well as avascular necrosis of the talus. Although the development of non-reactive metallic implants has made it possible to replace other joints of the human body, such as the elbow and the knee, until very recently the usual procedure for the treatment of the ankle joint was to obliterate the joint by fusion, which, of course, rendersthe ankle stiff and generally immobile, or by surgical removal of the damaged portions of the ankle joint and provision of a suitable ankle brace to give the patient some mobility.

The first reported use of a total ankle prosthesis known to applicant was by Buchholz in 1969 who implanted a device across the tibial-talar joint which consisted of a plastic insert in the tibia which engages a metal insert in the talus. The prosthesis, known as the St. Georg-Buchholz Total Ankle, is currently manufactured by the Waldemar Link Company in Hamburg, Germany and is distributed in the United States and Canada by Richards Manufacturing Company, Inc., Memphis, Tenn. In this device, the contact between the two inserts is convex-to-concave, which allows sliding contact in the anterior-posterior plane only and does not allow rotation of the ankle about a vertical axis, which tends to cause the inserts to loosen and require replacement. Moreover, insertion of this prosthesis requires osteotomy of the fibula, as well as temporary placement of a screw in the medial malleolus. This additional surgery, involving cracking of both sides of the ankle, tends to lengthen the period of rehabilitation, particularly in older patients.

G. Lord and J. H. Marote reported in 1971 in Journal of Orthopedics of the Hospital R. Poincare that arthoplasty of the ankle joint could be performed by total resection of the talus, fixation in the tibia of a metallic prosthesis, resembling that used in the hip, to engage a high density polyethylene bearing device placed in the calcaneus. The metallic portion is a relatively large spherical knob which forms a ball-and-socket type of joint with the bearing device, again a convex-tconcave contact, which permits some degree of rotation of the ankle about a vertical axis but no sliding motion. Insertion of the relatively large parts requires removal of the whole talus, tending to weaken the bearing structure. A ball-and-socket joint proposed by Richard Smith of San Diego, Calif. is somewhat smaller than that described by Lord and Marote, but it, too, does not allow for sliding motion in the anteriorposterior plane. Absence of such sliding motion, which is presentin the healthy human ankle joint, can be expected to cause shearing and early destruction of the digh density plastic utilized as one of the bearing memers.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The primary object of the present invention is to provide an improved implantable total ankle prosthesis having a bi-plane sliding motion which also allows dissipation of rotary forces and exhibiting minimal frictional forces. A more specific object is to provide a total ankle prosthesis which is relatively simple and inexpensive to fabricate, which is fully compatible with human body tissue, and which may be implanted with a minimum of disturbance of the ligaments that provide the normal medial-lateral stability of the articulation. These and other objects are accomplished in a prosthesis consisting of a sliding joint having a convex-toconvex bearing surface provided by an upper portion fabricated of polished Vitallium, a non-reactive alloy of chrome, nickel and cobalt, formed to have a T-shaped stem adapted for insertion in a correspondingly shaped slot formed in the tibia to there be held in place by a suitable cement. The lower portion of the joint is formed of ultra-high density polyethylene and has a shank shaped to be sunk into a cavity either milled or drilled in the surface of the body of the talus. Its bearing surface is also convex in shape, and in plan is trapezoidal in shape, being somewhat narrower at its posterior edge than at its anterior edge. The confronting convex bearing surfaces of the upper and lower portions of the joint provides a line contact which allows them to slide in bi-plane fashion relative to each other, and also allows rotation of the ankle about a vertical axis. In other words, one portion of the joint can roll on the other, or can slide relative to the other so that articulation of the joint portions closely simulates human ankle joint action. The low-friction metal-topolyethylene bearing substantially eliminates the possibility of reactive foreign particles being dispersed into the surrounding tissue.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Other objects, features and advantages of the invention, and a better understanding of its construction and operation will be had from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is an isometric view, greatly enlarged, of the ankle joint prosthesis according to the invention;

FIG. 1A is a front elevation view of the upper portion of the prosthetic joint;

FIG. 1B is a plan view of the upper surface of the lower portion of the joint;

FIG. 1C is a side elevation view of the lower portion;

FIG. 1D is a plan view of the underside of the lower portion; and

FIG. 2 is an anterior cutaway view of the human ankle showing the prosthesis in place.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The prosthesis according to the invention, which is shown greatly enlarged in the drawings, consists of two cooperating portions having confronting bearing surfaces, an upper portion 10 for attachment to the tibia, and a lower portion 12 to be secured to the talus. The upper portion is formed, as by casting, of a nonreactive metal, preferably a chrome-nickel-cobalt alloy known as Vitallium, and consists of a generally rectangularly shaped block 14, typically 32mm. long and 18mm. wide and 8mm. high. The under surface of the block is of convex shape. Integrally joined to and extending upwardly from approximately the geometric center of the rectangular upper surface of the block 14 is a T-shaped stem 16 of square cross-section, typically 6mm. by 6mm, having an overall length of about 15mm. In use, the T-shaped stem is inserted in a correspondingly shaped slot formed in the tibia and held in place by methylmathacrylate cement. The T-shape of the stem not only holds the element in the tibia, but also resists rotational forces to insure continued proper alignment of the upper portion with the lower portion with which it co-acts. As further insurance against displacement of the metallic implant relative to the tibia a groove 16a is formed in the upper surface and perpendicular to the axis of the cross-bar of the T, and depressions are formed in at least two of the vertical surfaces of the stem, one of which is visible at 16b in FIG. 1.

The lower portion 12 of the joint is formed, as by machining, of ultra-high density polyethylene and has a convex surface 18 which, when the prosthesis is in use, confronts and engages the convex surface of the upper portion 10. The radius of curvature of the surface 10 is typically 25mm. and is generally trapezoidal in shape, its posterior dimension 18a being somewhat smaller than its anterior dimension 18b. Typically, the front-toback dimension of the surface is 22 mm., and its nominal width is mm. As shown in FIG. 1C, the plastic component is squared off at its anterior and posterior edges, and on the underside is formed to have a planar surface 18C from which depends an integral shank 18, approximately 4.8mm long and of circular crosssection. The shank has a reverse taper to resist pullout, the maximum diameter being typically 16mm, and is formed with cross slots 18s to prevent rotation. When implanted, the shank 18d is sunk into a circular cavity drilled in the surface of the body of the talus, with the surface 18c engaging the surface of the talus surrounding the cavity. The lower portion 12 is firmly secured in the talar cavity by a suitable methylmathacrylate cement, the gripping power of which is increased by the reverse taper and the cross slots.

Without going into the full details of the operation procedure, the manner in which the prosthesis is implanted will now be generally described with reference to FIG. 2. An anterior or anterior-medial approach to the ankle joint is preferred because an incision at either of these locations preserves the medial and anterior talo-fibular ligaments on the lateral and medial sides of the ankle joint and so preserves the normal mediallateral stability of the articulation. Depending on the nature of the damage to the cartilage separating the tibia and the talus, the remaining cartilage of the tibia and approximately one quarter inch of the bone are resected. The T-shaped stem is then placed against the tibia at the intended location of the implant and the location marked. Using appropriate chisels, gouges and burring tools, a T-shaped slot is resected, the slot being slightly larger than the T-shaped stem so as to permit the metallic tibial component to be placed in position on the under surface of the resected tibia.

The next step involves resection of from one-fourth inch to three-eighths inch of the superior surface of the talus. Thereafter the surface of the resected talus is marked or scribed to indicate the outline of the plastic member at its desired location, together with the location of the shank 18d relative to the outline. Then a circular cavity of diameter slightly larger than the diameter of the shank is drilled and/or reamed into the body of the talus to a depth slightly greater than the length of the shank.

After the two components have been trail fitted for parallelism and are observed to slide under direct vision, they are then permanently cemented into place with methylmathacrylate cement.

The wound is then closed in layers and a suction drain is usually left in place for 24 to 48 hours. External immobilation of the ankle joint is utilized for a period of fourteen to twenty-one days before the patient is allowed to bear any weight on the new articulation.

It will be apparent from the foregoing that applicant has provided a total ankle prosthesis which by reason of its small size permits implantation with a minimum of disturbance of the ligaments of the ankle, is free of external protuberances that could cause irritation of surrounding tissue, has low friction, and does not have metal-to-metal contacts which can cause dispersion of reactive metal particles. Its convex-to-convex contact provides a line contact which can slide in both the anterior-posterior plane and in the plane perpendicular thereto, and which also allows rotation about a vertical axis, thus closely simulating the action of the normal human ankle joint. While there is disclosed what is now considered to be a preferred embodiment, many modifications and variations therein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the dimensions of the parts are subject to considerable variation without losing the advantages of the invention; specifically, the convexity of the confronting surfaces may be different than indicated, including reduction of the convexity of the talar member to almost flat. All such modifications are within the intended scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.

I claim:

1. Prosthesis for total replacement of the ankle joint of humans comprising,

first and second bearing members each having a convex surface and adapted to engage each other along a line contact, said first bearing member being formed of a metal alloy which is essentially non-reactive with body tissue and having a stern adapted to be received in a cavity formed in the tibia, and

said second bearing member being formed of high density plastic material and including an integral shank adapted to be received in a cavity formed in the surface of the head of the talus.

2. Prosthesis in accordance with claim 1 wherein said first bearing member comprises a generally rectangular block of said metal alloy, one surface of which has a predetermined radius of curvature defining its convex bearing surface, and wherein said stem is of T-shape and extends upwardly from the surface of the block opposite the convex surface.

3. Prosthesis in accordance with claim 2, wherein the convex surface of said second bearing member is of trapezoidal shape, with the posterior dimension being narrower than the anterior dimension.

4. Prosthesis in accordance with claim 3, wherein the shank on said second bearing member depends from the surface thereof opposite the convex surface and is of circular cross-section.

5. Prosthesis in accordance with claim 2, wherein said T-shaped stem has at least one groove formed therein for increasing the holding power of the cement with which said bearing member is secured to the tibia.

6. Prosthesis in accordance with claim 4, wherein the shank of said second bearing member has a reverse taper and has at least one groove formed in the free end thereof to increase the holding strength of the cement employed to secure said second bearing member in the cavity formed in the talus.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3521302 *Sep 1, 1967Jul 21, 1970Sulzer AgProsthetic implant joint having compressible slide members to promote joint lubrication
US3715763 *Apr 21, 1971Feb 13, 1973Link WArtificial limb for the knee joint
US3774244 *Feb 8, 1972Nov 27, 1973Relief Ruptured And Crippled SKnee-joint prosthesis
US3839742 *Jun 7, 1973Oct 8, 1974Link WProsthetic device for the tarsal joint
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3987500 *Jan 28, 1976Oct 26, 1976Schlein Allen PSurgically implantable total ankle prosthesis
US4158894 *Mar 13, 1978Jun 26, 1979Worrell Richard VPatellar prosthesis and method of implanting the same
US4179758 *Jul 26, 1977Dec 25, 1979Howmedica, Inc.Fixation stem for prosthetic device
US4301552 *Dec 10, 1979Nov 24, 1981Wright Manufacturing CompanyEndoprosthetic joint device
US6409767 *Nov 3, 2000Jun 25, 2002European Foot PlatformAnkle prosthesis
US6663669Oct 20, 2000Dec 16, 2003Mark A ReileyAnkle replacement system
US6860902Nov 3, 2003Mar 1, 2005Advanced Total Ankles, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US6875236Nov 3, 2003Apr 5, 2005Advanced Total Ankles, Inc.Intramedullary guidance systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US6939380Dec 23, 2002Sep 6, 2005Depuy Products, Inc.Mobile talar component for total ankle replacement implant
US7025790Jun 27, 2002Apr 11, 2006Concepts In Medicine Iii, L.L.C.Ankle joint prosthesis and its method of implantation
US7314488Jan 19, 2005Jan 1, 2008Inbone Technologies, Inc.Intramedullary guidance systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US7534270Sep 2, 2004May 19, 2009Integra Lifesciences CorporationModular total ankle prosthesis apparatuses and methods
US7615082Sep 22, 2004Nov 10, 2009Hjs Gelenk System GmbhArtificial joint
US7641697Aug 27, 2007Jan 5, 2010Inbone Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US7717920Oct 31, 2007May 18, 2010Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement prostheses
US7915046Nov 10, 2009Mar 29, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.System and method for determining the operating state of orthopaedic admixtures
US7935118Jun 21, 2002May 3, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.Prosthesis removal cutting guide, cutting tool and method
US8034114Dec 29, 2006Oct 11, 2011Inbone Technologies, Inc.Systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US8034115 *Apr 16, 2009Oct 11, 2011Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US8048164 *Jan 18, 2005Nov 1, 2011Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US8491596Mar 9, 2009Jul 23, 2013Depuy Products, Inc.Method for removal of bone
US8545507May 2, 2011Oct 1, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCProsthesis removal cutting guide, cutting tool and method
US9119642 *Feb 12, 2015Sep 1, 2015Albert H. BursteinJoint replacement spacers
US9186154Mar 17, 2011Nov 17, 2015Zimmer, Inc.Patient-specific instruments for total ankle arthroplasty
US9248024Oct 12, 2007Feb 2, 2016Integra Life Sciences CorporationAnkle prosthesis for the arthrodesis of the calcaneum
US9278004Mar 15, 2013Mar 8, 2016Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular joints
US9308097Jul 29, 2014Apr 12, 2016Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US9320609Jun 1, 2004Apr 26, 2016Lew C. SchonSemi-constrained ankle joint prosthesis and its method of implantation
US9468466Aug 23, 2013Oct 18, 2016Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the spine
US9480486 *Mar 15, 2013Nov 1, 2016Albert H. BursteinJoint replacement spacers
US9629730Apr 6, 2016Apr 25, 2017Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US9668868Mar 11, 2015Jun 6, 2017Cotera, Inc.Apparatus and methods for treatment of patellofemoral conditions
US20020143403 *Jan 2, 2002Oct 3, 2002Vaidyanathan K. RanjiCompositions and methods for biomedical applications
US20030236525 *Jun 21, 2002Dec 25, 2003Vendrely Timothy G.Prosthesis removal cutting guide, cutting tool and method
US20040002768 *Jun 27, 2002Jan 1, 2004Parks Brent G.Ankle joint prosthesis and its method of implantation
US20040092942 *Nov 3, 2003May 13, 2004Reiley Mark A.Intramedullary guidance systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US20040117027 *Nov 3, 2003Jun 17, 2004Reiley Mark A.Ankle replacement system
US20040122523 *Dec 23, 2002Jun 24, 2004Guzman Jose F.Mobile talar component for total ankle replacement implant
US20050004676 *Jun 1, 2004Jan 6, 2005Schon Lew C.Semi-constrained ankle joint prosthesis and its method of implantation
US20050049711 *Sep 2, 2004Mar 3, 2005Ball Robert J.Modular total ankle prosthesis apparatuses and methods
US20050124995 *Jan 19, 2005Jun 9, 2005Advanced Total Ankles, Inc.Intramedullary guidance systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US20050125069 *Sep 22, 2004Jun 9, 2005Hjs Gelenk System GmbhArtificial joint
US20050125070 *Jan 18, 2005Jun 9, 2005Advanced Total Ankles, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US20050288792 *Jun 23, 2004Dec 29, 2005Landes Mark DModular ankle prosthesis and associated method
US20060020345 *Jun 8, 2005Jan 26, 2006O'connor John JProsthesis device for the ankle articulation
US20060142870 *Aug 19, 2005Jun 29, 2006Shawn RobinsonModular total ankle prosthesis apparatuses, systems and methods, and systems and methods for bone resection and prosthetic implantation
US20070112432 *Dec 29, 2006May 17, 2007Advanced Total Ankles, Inc.Systems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US20070299533 *Aug 27, 2007Dec 27, 2007Reiley Mark ASystems and methods for installing ankle replacement prostheses
US20090054992 *Nov 3, 2008Feb 26, 2009Landes Mark DModular Ankle Prosthesis and Associated Method
US20090082875 *Sep 26, 2007Mar 26, 2009Depuy Products, Inc.Talar implant system and method
US20090240338 *Apr 16, 2009Sep 24, 2009Inbone Technologies, Inc.Ankle replacement system
US20100023066 *Mar 9, 2009Jan 28, 2010Depuy Products, Inc.Method for Removal of Bone
US20100050773 *Nov 10, 2009Mar 4, 2010Depuy Products, Inc.System and Method for Determining the Operating State of Orthopaedic Admixtures
US20100131069 *Feb 2, 2010May 27, 2010Jeffrey HalbrechtMethod and system for patella tendon realignment
US20100198354 *Jul 30, 2008Aug 5, 2010Jeffrey HalbrechtMethod and system for patella tendon realignment
US20110208199 *May 2, 2011Aug 25, 2011Depuy Products, Inc.Prosthesis Removal Cutting Guide, Cutting Tool and Method
US20140277552 *Mar 15, 2013Sep 18, 2014Albert H. BursteinJoint replacement spacers
US20150190152 *Feb 12, 2015Jul 9, 2015Albert H. BursteinJoint replacement spacers
EP1223896A2 *Oct 20, 2000Jul 24, 2002Mark A. ReileyAnkle replacement system
EP1223896A4 *Oct 20, 2000Feb 26, 2003Mark A ReileyAnkle replacement system
EP2913030A1 *Sep 30, 2008Sep 2, 2015Wright Medical Technology, Inc.Ankle prosthesis and a tibial component therefor
WO2001030264A2 *Oct 20, 2000May 3, 2001Reiley Mark AAnkle replacement system
WO2001030264A3 *Oct 20, 2000Oct 25, 2001Mark A ReileyAnkle replacement system
WO2003079938A1 *Mar 13, 2003Oct 2, 2003Hjs Gelenk System GmbhArtificial joint
WO2010039026A1 *Sep 30, 2008Apr 8, 2010J. Van Straten Beheer B.V.Ankle prosthesis and a tibial component therefor
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/21.18
International ClassificationA61F2/42
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2/4202
European ClassificationA61F2/42A