|Publication number||US3891541 A|
|Publication date||Jun 24, 1975|
|Filing date||Aug 29, 1973|
|Priority date||Aug 29, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3891541 A, US 3891541A, US-A-3891541, US3891541 A, US3891541A|
|Inventors||Milstein Donald, Oleck Stephen M, Sherry Howard S, Stein Thomas R|
|Original Assignee||Mobil Oil Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (87), Classifications (34)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [1 1 Oleck et al.
 3,891,541 51 June 24, 1975 PROCESS FOR DEMETALIZING AND DESULFURIZING RESIDUAL OIL WITH HYDROGEN AND ALUMlNA-SUPPORTED CATALYST  Inventors: Stephen M. Oleck, Moorestown;
Thomas R. Stein, Cherry Hill; Howard S. Sherry, Cherry Hill; Donald Milstein, Cherry Hill, all of  Assignee: Mobil Oil Corporation, New York,
 Filed: Aug. 29, 1973  Appl. No.: 392,708
 US. Cl. 208/89; 208/216; 208/251 H 51 Im. Cl Cl0g 23/02  Field of Search 208/216, 89, 213, 25] H,
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,622,500 11/1971 Alpert et a1 208/216 3,630,888 12/1971 Alpert ct al 4. 208/216 3,669,904 6/1972 Cornelius et al 252/465 3,712,861 1/1973 Rosinski et al. 208/216 3,714,032 1/1973 Bertolacini et a1. 208/216 3,730,879 5/1973 Christman et a1. 208/210 Primary Examiner-Delbert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-G. J. Crasanakis Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Charles A. Huggett; Michael G. Gilman; Vincent J. Frilette 57 ABSTRACT 7 Claims, 5 Drawing Figures Demetoloflon, Wt. 7
PATENTEDJUN24 ms 3.891. 541 SHEET 1 FIGURE 1' DEMETALATION SELECTIVITY FOR HYDROPROCESSING KUWAIT ATM RESIDUA (3.9 WT"/ SULFUR, 5| PPM MW) 2000 p sig, 0.75 LHSV Smo 8056 Catalyst A l I I I I 50 so I00 PATENTEDJUN24 ms 3,891,541
saw 2 FIGURE 2 CATALYST DEMETALATION ACTIVITY FOR HYDROPROCESSING KUWAIT ATMOSPHERIC RESIDUA (3.9 WT SULFUR, 5| PPM Ni v) 2000 p s ig 0.75 LHSV IOO Smo 8056 E 90 .9 580 Q) E Q.) Q
Catalyst A 60 l l I 675 725 775 Required Catalyst TemperofurefF PATENTEDJUN 24 I975 SHEET m? m? Kw O 0 m M ow w mmom m M o w 5228 r om gnaw 0 POROSITY PROFILE Sample SMO- 805| 1 Micron l0,000 Angsfroms PATENTEIJ JUN 24 1975 FIGURE!- SHEET 4 OOIO D Pore Diameter (Microns) 5 0' 0' m3 uogmueue IQOOO 8000 Absolute Pressure (Psi) PATENTEDJUN 24 I975 SHEET OON OO OOO 00m 00m OON OOQ OOm 00 00m OON OO O W 933 J 29 E052 wm M 55 2mm W &3 2 l 2w n C v 53 2 :3 0 fim o M 0.32 annex u 1 w BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION l. Field of the Invention This invention relates to demetalation and desulfurization of petroleum oils, preferably those containing residual hydrocarbon components, and having a significant metals and sulfur content. More particularly the invention relates to a demetalation-desulfurization process for reducing high metals and sulfur contents of petroleum oils, again preferably those containing residual hydrocarbon components, by the use of catalytic compositions that are especially effective for such a purpose.
2. Description of the Prior Art Residual petroleum oil fractions such as those heavy fractions produced by atmospheric and vacuum crude distillation columns, are typically characterized as being undesirable as feedstocks for most refining pro cesses due primarily to their high metals and sulfur content. The presence of high concentrations of metals and sulfur and their compounds precludes the effective use of such residua as chargestocks for cracking, hydrocracking and coking operations as well as limiting the extent to which such residua may be used as fuel oil. Perhaps the single most undesirable characteristic of such feedstocks is the high metals content. Principal metal contaminants are nickel and vanadium, with iron and small amounts of copper also sometimes present. Additionally, trace amounts of zinc and sodium are found in some feedstocks. As the great majority of these metals when present in crude oil are associated with very large hydrocarbon molecules, the heavier fractions produced by crude distillation contain substantially all the metal present in the crude, such metals being particularly concentrated in the asphaltene residual fraction. The metal contaminants are typically large organo-metallic complexes such as metal prophyrins and asphaltenes.
At present, cracking operations are generally performed on petroleum fractions lighter than residua fractions. Such cracking is commonly carried out in a reactor operated at a temperature of about 800 to 1500F., a pressure of about 1 to 5 atmospheres, and a space velocity of about 1 to 1000 WHSV. Typical cracking chargestocks are coker and/or crude unit gas oils, vacuum tower overhead etc., the feedstock having an API gravity range of between about to about 45. As these cracking chargestocks are lighter than residual hydrocarbon fractions, residual fractions being characterized as having an API gravity of less than about 20, they do not contain significant proportions of the heavy and large molecules in which the metals are concentrated.
When metals are present in a cracking unit chargestock such metals are deposited on the cracking catalyst. The metals act as a catalyst poison and greatly decrease the efficiency of the cracking process by altering the catalyst so that it promotes increased hydrogen production.
The amount of metals present in a given hydrocarbon stream is generally judged by petroleum engineers by making reference to a chargestocks "metals factor. This factor is equal to the summation of the metals concentration in parts per million of iron and vanadium plus ten times the amount of nickel and copper in parts per million. The factor may be expressed in an equation form as follows:
A chargestock having a metals factor greater than 2.5 is indicative of a chargestock which will poison cracking catalyst to a significant degree. A typical Kuwait atmospheric crude generally considered of average metals content, has a metals factor of about to about 100. As almost all of the metals are combined with the residual fraction of a crude stock, it is clear that metals removal of percent and greater will be required to make such fractions (having a metals factor of about 150 to 200) suitable for cracking chargestocks.
Sulfur is also undesirable in a process unit chargestock. The sulfur contributes to corrosion of the unit mechanical equipment and creates difficulties in treating products and flue gases. At typical cracking conversion rates, about one half of the sulfur charged to the unit is converted to H 5 gas which must be removed from the light gas product, usually by scrubbing with an amine stream. A large portion of the remaining sulfur is deposited on the cracking catalyst itself. When the catalyst is regenerated, at least a portion of this sulfur is oxidized to form S0 and/or 50;, gas which must be removed from the flue gas which is normally discharged into the atmosphere.
Such metals and sulfur contaminants present similar problems with regard to hydrocracking operations which are typically carried out on chargestocks even lighter than those charged to a cracking unit, and thus typically having an even smaller amount of metals present. Hydrocracking catalyst is so sensitive to metals poisoning that a preliminary or first stage is often utilized for trace metals removal. Typical hydrocracking reactor conditions consist of a temperature of 400 to I000F. and a pressure of to 3500 psig.
ln the past, and to a limited extent under present operating schemes, high molecular weight stocks containing sulfur and metal have often been processed in a coker to effectively remove metals and also some of the sulfur, the contaminants remaining in the solid coke. Coking is typically carried out in a reactor or drum operated at about 800 to 1100F. temperature and a pressure of l to l0 atmospheres wherein heavy oils are converted to lighter gas oils, gasoline, gas and solid coke. However, there are limits to the amount of metals and sulfur that can be tolerated in the product coke if it is to be saleable. Hence, there is considerable need to develop economical as well as efficient means for effecting the removal and recovery of metallic and nonmetallic contaminants from various fractions of petroleum oils so that conversion of such contaminated charges to more desirable product may be effectively accomplished. The present invention is particularly concerned with the removal of metal contaminants from hydrocarbon materials contaminated with the same. Also of concern is the removal of sulfur contaminants from the contaminated hydrocarbon fractions.
It has been proposed to improve the salability of high sulfur content, residual-containing petroleum oils by a variety of hydrodesulfurization processes. However, difficulty has been experienced in achieving an economically feasible catalytic hydrodesulfurization process, because notwithstanding the fact that the desulfurized products may have a wider marketability, the
manufacturer may be able to charge little or no addi tional premium for the low sulfur desulfurized products, and since hydrodesulfurization operating costs have tended to be relatively high in view of the previously experienced, relatively short life for catalysts used in hydrodesulfurization of residual-containing stocks. Short catalyst life is manifested by inability of a catalyst to maintain a relatively high capability for desulfurizing chargestock with increasing quantities of coke and/or metallic contaminants which act as catalyst poisons. Satisfactory catalyst life can be obtained relatively easily with distillate oils, but is especially difficult to obtain when desulfurizing petroleum oils containing residual components, since the asphaltene or asphaltic components of an oil, which tend to form disproportionate amounts of coke, are concentrated in the residual fractions of a petroleum oil, and since a relatively high proportion of the metallic contaminants that normally tend to poison catalysts are commonly found in the asphaltene components of the oil.
An objective of this invention is to provide means for the removal of metal and/or sulfur contaminants from petroleum oils. A further objective of this invention is to provide means for the removal of metal and/or sulfur contaminants from residual hydrocarbon fractions. Another objective of this invention is to provide a method whereby hydrocarbon fractions having a significant metal and/or sulfur contaminant content may be demetalized in order to produce suitable cracking, hydrocracking or coking unit chargestock. An objective of this invention is to provide means for the removal of sulfur contaminants from petroleum oils. A further objective of this invention is to provide a method whereby hydrocarbon fractions having a significant metal and/or sulfur contaminant content may be demetalized in order to produce a suitable fuel oil or fuel oil blend stock. Other and additional objectives of this invention will become obvious to those skilled in the art following a consideration of the entire specification including the drawings and claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a curve showing the demetalation and desulfurization ability of a catalyst of the class according to the present invention as compared with another catalyst now used commercially for demetalation and desulfurization.
FIG. 2 is a curve showing demetalation activity as a function of temperature for a catalyst of the class of the present invention as compared with another catalyst now used commercially for such a process.
FIG. 3 is a curve showing desulfurization activity as a function of temperature for a catalyst of the class of this invention as compared with another catalyst now used commercially for such a process.
FIG. 4 is a porosity profile of a catalyst of the class of this invention.
FIG. 5 is an alumina phase diagram.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION A hydrodemetalation-desulfurization class of catalysts comprising a hydrogenating component (cobalt and molybdenum in a preferred embodiment) composited with a refractory base (alumina in a preferred embodiment), said composite catalyst having not less than 65 1': of the volume of the pores having a diameter within the range of about ISO-300A and having a surface area of about 40 to I00 m lg has been discovered.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory of operability, it is postulated that the utility of this inventions catalyst is produced by the high concentration of pores within the 180-300A range.
A metal and/or sulfur containing hydrocarbon chargestock is contacted with a catalyst of the class of this invention under a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 3000 psig and a hydrogen circulation rate of about 1000 to l5,000 s.c.f./bbl of feed, and at about 600 to 850F. temperature and 0.l to 5.0 LHSV. When higher desulfurization is desired, the preferred operating conditions are more severe: 725 to 850F., a hydrogen pressure of 2000 to 3000 and a space velocity of 0. ID to 1.5 LHSV.
Catalysts having a surface area of about 40 to about 100 m /g performed well. A preferred surface area is m lg or less. FIG. 4 illustrates the porosity profile of a catalyst of the class of applicants invention. Such a profile is produced by plotting the amount of a fluid (in this case mercury) in cc/g forced into the pore structure as a function of pressure. As the pressure is increased. the mercury is forced into smaller and smaller pores. As is shown by curve 4, a dramatic increase in penetration with a small pressure increase indicates that the structure has a large number of pores within a particular size. The specific size is determined by a standard capilliary tube equation calculation.
As illustrated in FIG. 1, a catalyst of such a class has the ability to dramatically reduce metals content by as much as 98 percent, while also removing over percent of the sulfur contaminants.
As illustrated by FIG. 1, a catalyst of the class of this invention has a strong selectivity for metals removal. Thus, a catalyst of the type of this invention might well be employed with a second catalyst having a high selectivity for sulfur removal, such as a catalyst having at least about 50 percent of its pores in a 30A to 100A range. Optimum metals lay-down might be achieved by layering the two catalysts, the 30A to IOOA catalyst upstream of the catalyst of this invention. The petroleum oils demetallized and desulfurized by such a layered catalyst treatment would be particularly useful as a cracking feedstock.
The catalyst is prepared by impregnating one or more hydrogenating components on a suitable particulate matter refractory base, in a preferred embodiment cobalt and molybdenum on a theta and/or delta phase alumina base. A specific method of preparation is given in Example 4. A particularly suitable particulate material for demetalizing is one which has pores sufficiently large to permit relatively unrestricted movement of the metal complex molecule in and out of the pore as well as decomposition products thereof after deposition of released metal. Solid porous particulate materials which may be used with varying degrees of success for this purpose include relatively large pore silica alumina and silica-magnesia type compositions of little cracking activity, activated carbon, charcoal, petroleum coke and particularly large pore aluminas or high alumina ores and clays.
Clay supports of particular interest are those known as dickite, halloysite and kaolinite. On the other hand, ores fitting the herein provided physical properties either as existing in their natural or original form or employed with alumina binders or after chemical treatment thereof may also be used as porous support materials in combination with the desired hydrogenation activity herein discussed. By chemical treatment we intend to include acid or caustic treatment as well as treatment with aqueous solutions like sodium aluminate and alumina sulfate containing alumina to increase the alumina content of the support.
The feedstock to be demetalized can be any metal contaminant containing petroleum stock, preferably one containing residual fractions. A process in accordance with the previously described operating conditions is especially advantageous in connection with chargestocks having a metals factor of greater than about 25.
From what has been said, it will be clear that the feedstock can be a whole crude. However, since the high metal and sulfur components of a crude oil tend to be concentrated in the higher boiling fractions, the present process more commonly will be applied to a bottoms fraction of a petroleum oil, i.e. one which is obtained by atmospheric distillation of a crude petroleum oil to remove lower boiling materials such as naphtha and furnace oil or by vacuum distillation of an atmospheric residue to remove gas oil. Typical residues to which the present invention is applicable will normally be substantially composed of residual hydrocarbons boiling above 900F. and containing a substantial quantity of asphaltic materials. Thus, the chargestock can be one having an initial or 5 percent boiling point somewhat below 900F., provided that a substantial proportion, for example, about 40 or 50 percent by volume, of its hydrocarbon components boil above 900F. A hydrocarbon stock having a 50 percent boiling point of about 900F. and which contains asphaltic materials, 4 percent by weight sulfur and 51 ppm nickel and vanadium is illustrative of such chargestock. Typical process conditions may be defined as contacting a metal and or sulfur contaminant containing chargestock with this invention 5 catalyst under a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 3000 psig, of 600 to 850F. temperature, 0.1 to 5 LHSV.
The hydrogen gas which is used during the hydrodemetalation-hydrodesulfurization is circulated at a rate between about lOOO and 15,000 s.c.f./bbl of feed and preferably between about 3000 and 8000 s.c.f./bbl. The hydrogen purity may vary from about 60 to 100 percent. If the hydrogen is recycled, which is customary, it is desirable to provide for bleeding off a portion of the recycle gas and to add makeup hydrogen in order to maintain the hydrogen purity within the range specified. Satisfactory removal of hydrogen sulfide from the recycled gas will ordinarily be accomplished by such bleed-off procedures. However, if desired, the recycled gas can be washed with a chemical absorbent for hydrogen sulfide or otherwise treated in known manner to reduce the hydrogen sulfide content thereof prior to recycling.
The invention is especially beneficial where the hydrodemetalation-desulfurization is effected without concomitant cracking of the hydrocarbons present in the feedstock. To achieve this result, the temperature and space velocity are selected within the ranges specified earlier that will result in the reduction of the metals content of the feedstock of about 75 to 98 percent, preferably over 90 percent.
The hydrogenating component of the class of catalysts disclosed herein can be any material or combination thereof that is effective to hydrogenate and desulfurize the chargestock under the reaction conditions utilized. For example, the hydrogenating component can be at least one member of the group consisting of Group VI and Group VIII metals in a form capable of promoting hydrogenation reactions, especially effective catalysts for the purposes of this invention are those comprising molybdenum and at least one member of the iron group metals. Preferred catalysts of this class are those containing cobalt and molybdenum, but other combinations of iron group metals and molybdenum such as iron, zinc, nickel and molybdenum, as well as combinations of nickel and molybdenum, cobalt and molybdenum, nickel and tungsten or other Group V] or Group VIII metals of the Periodic Table taken singly or in combination. The hydrogenating components of the catalysts of this invention can be employed in sulfided or unsulfided form.
When the use ofa catalyst in sulfided form is desired, the catalyst can be presulfided, after calcination, or calcination and reduction, prior to contact with the chargestock, by contact with sulfiding mixture of hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide, at a temperature in the range of about 400 to 800F., at atmospheric or elevated pressures. Presulfiding can be conveniently effected at the beginning of an onstream period at the same conditions to be employed at the start of such period. The exact proportions of hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide are not critical, and mixtures containing low or high proportions of hydrogen sulfide can be used. Relatively low proportions are preferred for economic reasons. When the unused hydrogen and hydrogen sulfide utilized in the presulfiding operation is recycled through the catalyst bed, any water formed during presulfiding is preferably removed prior to recycling through the catalyst bed. It will be understood that elemental sulfur or sulfur compounds, e.g. mercaptans, or carbon disulfide that are capable of yielding hydrogen sulfide at the sulfiding conditions, can be used in lieu of hydrogen sulfide.
Although presulfiding of the catalyst is preferred, it is emphasized that this is not essential as the catalyst will normally become sulfided in a very short time by contact, at the process conditions disclosed herein, with the high sulfur content feedstocks to be used.
The most relevant prior art discovered in the area is that of Beuther et al., US. Pat. No. 3,383,301. That patent also deals with demetalation and desulfurization and an alumina base catalyst on which is composited a hydrogenating component, the pore volume of the resultant catalyst having a particular pore size distribution. However, the particular pore size distribution of this disclosure is significantly different from that of Beuther. Not only does that patent not teach or tend to lead one to the catalyst characteristics of this invention, the Beuther et al. disclosure basis of patentability is in fact contrary to that which has been discovered.
While Beuther discloses a desulfurization catalyst whose pore volume is distributed over (a) wide range of pore sizes," it has been discovered that a catalyst which has its pore volume substantially concentrated in certain narrowly defined sizes produces superior demetalation and desulfurization properties. Beuther teaches that in order to attain such a wide range of pore size, no more than 15 percent of the volume of the pores should be present in any 10A radius incremental unit in the overall range of 0-300A radius. Not only does the catalyst which has here been discovered have several A radius increments having greater than percent of the pore volume, the catalyst has such large percentage pore size increments adjacent to each other, thus further distinguishing from Beuthers wide pore size range. The catalyst of this invention has over 65 i 10% of its pore volume in the narrow range of 90-150A radius (l80-300A diameter). The catalyst of this invention may be further defined as having a surface area of about 40 to 100 m lg, and preferably about 70 m lg or less, and an average pore diameter of about 200A to 400A diameter. Other somewhat less relevant patents in this general area are listed as follows: Anderson (US. Pat. No. 2,890,162); Erickson (U.S. Pat. No. 3,242,101); Bertolacini (US. Pat. No. 3,393,148); Roselinus (US. Pat. No. 3,684,688); Bertolacini (US. Pat. No. 3,714,032) and Christman (US. Pat. No. 3,730,879). None of these patents teach the particular pore distribution of this disclosure.
While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory of operability, it is felt that the uniqueness of this inventions catalyst is at least partially due to the fact that the alumina catalyst base is calcined to a particular temperature thereby producing a specific alumina. It is felt that it is this phase which produces the distinct pore size distribution of the catalyst. The particular method of preparation of the catalyst of this invention is explained in detail in Example 4.
As noted in Alumina Properties p. 46 by Newsome, Heiser, Russel and Stumpf (Alcoa Research Laboratories, 1960), the theta alumina phase may only be reached through employing an alpha monohydrate or a beta trihydrate alumina form. Calcining temperatures required to achieve the theta phase vary depending on which alumina form is utilized as the initial alumina. An alpha monohydrate enters the gamma phase at about 500C., crosses the transition point into the delta phase at about 860C. and enters the narrowly temperature banded theta phase at about 1060C. The transition point between theta and alpha phases being at about 1 150C.
When utilizing a beta trihydrate as an initial alumina, the theta phase is broader, its limits being about 860C. to about 1 160C. It should be noted that both beta trihydrate and alpha trihydrate aluminas may also be transformed into the alpha monohydrate form. The alumina phase diagram is presented in FIG. 6.
DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS Examples l-3 In these specific embodiments, two catalysts representative of the class disclosed herein (Examples 2 and 3) were prepared by cobalt-molybdenum deposition on alumina as further described in Example 4. These catalysts were then tested for demetalation and desulfurization ability. Both the physical characteristics of these catalysts and the demetalation-desulfurization activity results are shown in Table 1 as compared with the characteristics and activity of a commercial catalyst (Example 1).
The operating conditions for each of the Examples l-3 comprised 2000 psig hydrogen pressure, 0.75 LHSV space velocity, 725F., and 5000 s.c.f. H lbbl of residual fraction (Kuwait Atmospheric Residua having 3.54% by weight sulfur, 12 ppm Ni and 42 ppm V).
FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 as previously described represent a comparison of the activity of demetalation and desulfurization of Example 1, a catalyst now being used commercially and Example 2, a catalyst of the class of this invention.
Example 4 A preparation procedure for the demetalation-desulfurization class of catalysts of this invention may be defined as follows:
1400 grams of catapal SB alumina was aged in about 700 grams of water for about 16 hours at about 200F. The mixture of alumina was then mixed with a mechanical mixer for about 15 minutes. The alumina was then extruded through a l/32 inch diameter auger extruder and dried thoroughly at about 25 0F.
The alumina was then calcined with a dry air flow at a rate of about 2F/minute up to a temperature of about 1000F., that temperature being held constant for about 10 hours. The alumina was next calcined for 2 hours at about 1950F., the temperature being increased as rapidly as possible and without an air flow.
Water was added to about 91.8 grams of ammonium molybdate solution (81.9 purity) until a total volume of. about 260 grams was reached. This solution was then placed under vacuum with the alumina. Following this vacuum impregnation step, the alumina was dried at about 250F.
Finally, the 585 grams of molybdenum impregnated alumina was impregnated under vacuum with about 76.2 grams of CoCl .6H O diluted in water to a total volume of about 176 ml. The cobalt molybdenum impregnated alumina was then dried at 250F. and calcined by heating to a temperature of about 1000F. at a rate of about 34F/minute and held at that temperature for about 10 hours.
TABLE 1 PROPERTIES AND ACTIVITY OF RESID HYDROPROCESSING CATALYSTS TABLE 1- Continued Example Number I 2 3 Catalyst CATALYST A SMo-8056 SMo-8051 300 240 0 33.9 2.5 240 220 0 12.8 3.9 220 200 0 8.0 43.7 200 180 0 5.1 24.5 I80 160 0 3.8 8.4 160 140 0.2 2.2 5.6 140 120 0.2 1.6 4.2 120 100 1.0 1.3 2.8 100-80 1.0 1.0 1.1 80 60 76.4 1.4 0.0 60 40 6.9 1.8 0.0 40 0 12.0 8.2 0.0 Activity Desulfurization. wt. 85 77 76 Demetalation, wt. 7c 57 94 71 H, Consumption, SCF/B 600 420 510 What IS claimed 1s: said demetalation and desulfurization step, said coking l. A process for catalytically demetalizing and desulfurizing a residual oil comprising contacting said oil with hydrogen under the following hydroprocessing conditions: a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 3000 psig, a hydrogen circulation rate of about 1000 to 15,000 scf/bbl of feed, a temperature of about 600 to 850F, a space velocity of 0.1 to 5.0 LHSV, in the presence of a catalyst comprising the oxides or sulfides of a Group VIB metal and an iron group metal on an alumina support, said catalyst having not less than about 55 to 75% of its pore volume in pores having a diameter range of about 180A to about 300A, and having a surface area in the range of 40 to 70 m /g. I
2. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said process includes the step of cracking said oil following said demetalation and said desulfurization step, said cracking being carried out under the following conditions: 800to 1500F. temperature, 1 to 5 atmospheres pressure and a space velocity of about 1 to 1000 WHSV.
3. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said process includes the step of hydrocracking said oil following said demetalation and desulfurization step, said hydrocracking being carried out under the following conditions: 400 to 1000F. temperature and 100 to 3500 psig pressure.
4. The process as claimed in claim 1 wherein said process includes the step of coking said oil following being carried out under the following conditions: 800 to 1100F. temperature and l to 10 atmospheres pressure.
5. A process for catalytically desulfurizing a residual oil comprising contacting said oil with hydrogen under the following hydroprocessing conditions: a hydrogen pressure of about 500 to 3000 psig, a hydrogen circulation rate of about 1000 to 15,000 scf/bbl of feed, a temperature of about 600 to 850F, a space velocity of 0.1 to 5.0 LHSV, in the presence of a catalyst comprising the oxides or sulfides ofa Group VIB metal and an iron group metal on an alumina support, said catalyst having not less than about 55 to of its pore volume in pores having a diameter range of about A to about 300A, and having a surface area in the range of 40 to 70 m /g.
6. The process as claimed in claim 5 wherein said desulfurizing step occurs at the following conditions: a hydrogen pressure of 2000 to 3000 psig, a temperature of about 725 to 850F. and a space velocity of about 0. 10 to 1.5.
7. The process as claimed in claim 6 wherein said process includes the step of coking said oil following said desulfurization step, said coking being carried out under the following conditions: 800 to 1100F. temperature and l to 10 atmospheres pressure.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3622500 *||Apr 21, 1970||Nov 23, 1971||Hydrocarbon Research Inc||Hydrogenation of hydrocarbons with catalytic microspheres|
|US3630888 *||Mar 2, 1970||Dec 28, 1971||Hydrocarbon Research Inc||Hydrocracking and desulfurization with a catalyst having|
|US3669904 *||May 28, 1970||Jun 13, 1972||Air Prod & Chem||Particles featuring gamma alumina|
|US3712861 *||Oct 19, 1970||Jan 23, 1973||Mobil Oil Corp||Upgrading a hydrocarbon utilizing a catalyst of metal sulfides dispersed in alumina|
|US3714032 *||Nov 25, 1970||Jan 30, 1973||Standard Oil Co||Process for treating a high-boiling petroleum hydrocarbon feedstock|
|US3730879 *||Nov 19, 1970||May 1, 1973||Gulf Research Development Co||Two-bed catalyst arrangement for hydrodesulrurization of crude oil|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3931052 *||Mar 3, 1975||Jan 6, 1976||Mobil Oil Corporation||Alumina-supported catalyst for residua demetalation and desulfurization|
|US4045331 *||Oct 23, 1975||Aug 30, 1977||Union Oil Company Of California||Demetallization and desulfurization of petroleum feed-stocks with manganese on alumina catalysts|
|US4176048 *||Oct 31, 1978||Nov 27, 1979||Standard Oil Company (Indiana)||Process for conversion of heavy hydrocarbons|
|US4267071 *||Aug 8, 1977||May 12, 1981||Mobil Oil Corporation||Catalyst for hydrotreating residual petroleum oil|
|US4334982 *||May 21, 1980||Jun 15, 1982||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for the selective desulfurization of olefinic cuts|
|US4351717 *||Nov 21, 1980||Sep 28, 1982||Mobil Oil Corporation||Catalyst for hydrotreating residual petroleum oil|
|US4358400 *||Jan 12, 1981||Nov 9, 1982||Chevron Research Company||Residual oil processing catalysts|
|US4364857 *||Jan 12, 1981||Dec 21, 1982||Chevron Research Company||Fibrous clay mixtures|
|US4394253 *||Sep 26, 1979||Jul 19, 1983||Chevron Research Company||Hydrocarbons hydroprocessing with imogolite catalyst|
|US4399057 *||Jun 17, 1981||Aug 16, 1983||Standard Oil Company (Indiana)||Catalyst and support, their methods of preparation, and processes employing same|
|US4404097 *||Sep 18, 1981||Sep 13, 1983||Mobil Oil Corporation||Residua demetalation/desulfurization catalyst and methods for its use|
|US4422960 *||Dec 14, 1980||Dec 27, 1983||Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.||Catalysts for hydrotreatment of heavy hydrocarbon oils containing asphaltenes|
|US4431526 *||Jul 6, 1982||Feb 14, 1984||Union Oil Company Of California||Multiple-stage hydroprocessing of hydrocarbon oil|
|US4444655 *||Sep 30, 1982||Apr 24, 1984||Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.||Hydrotreatment of heavy hydrocarbon oils containing asphaltenes, and catalysts therefor|
|US4572778 *||Jan 19, 1984||Feb 25, 1986||Union Oil Company Of California||Hydroprocessing with a large pore catalyst|
|US4585546 *||Apr 29, 1983||Apr 29, 1986||Mobil Oil Corporation||Hydrotreating petroleum heavy ends in aromatic solvents with large pore size alumina|
|US4588709 *||Apr 19, 1985||May 13, 1986||Intevep, S.A.||Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues|
|US4642179 *||Feb 28, 1986||Feb 10, 1987||Intevep, S.A.||Catalyst for removing sulfur and metal contaminants from heavy crudes and residues|
|US4767523 *||Mar 11, 1987||Aug 30, 1988||Phillips Petroleum Company||Treated alumina material for fixed hydrofining beds|
|US4810361 *||May 18, 1987||Mar 7, 1989||Mobil Oil Corporation||Resid hydrotreating process using lanthana-alumina-aluminum phosphate catalyst|
|US4820676 *||May 26, 1988||Apr 11, 1989||Phillips Petroleum Company||Treated alumina material for fixed hydrofining beds and process for its preparation|
|US4828683 *||Feb 6, 1987||May 9, 1989||Phillips Petroleum Company||Hydrofining employing a support material for fixed beds|
|US4832829 *||Dec 2, 1987||May 23, 1989||Intevep S.A.||Catalyst for the simultaneous hydrodemetallization and hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks|
|US4837193 *||Aug 10, 1987||Jun 6, 1989||Toa Nenryo Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Hydrotreating catalyst and process of manufacture|
|US4885080 *||May 25, 1988||Dec 5, 1989||Phillips Petroleum Company||Process for demetallizing and desulfurizing heavy crude oil|
|US4895816 *||Jan 9, 1989||Jan 23, 1990||Gardner Lloyd E||Support material containing catalyst for fixed hydrofining beds|
|US7534342||Dec 16, 2004||May 19, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7588681||Dec 16, 2004||Sep 15, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7591941||Dec 16, 2004||Sep 22, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7615196||Dec 16, 2004||Nov 10, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Systems for producing a crude product|
|US7628908||Dec 16, 2004||Dec 8, 2009||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7648625||Dec 16, 2004||Jan 19, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7674368||Dec 16, 2004||Mar 9, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7674370||Dec 16, 2004||Mar 9, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7678264||Apr 7, 2006||Mar 16, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7736490||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 15, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7745369||Jun 22, 2006||Jun 29, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Method and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake|
|US7749374||Oct 3, 2007||Jul 6, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Methods for producing a crude product|
|US7780844||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 24, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7807046||Dec 16, 2004||Oct 5, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7837863||Dec 16, 2004||Nov 23, 2010||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7918992||Apr 7, 2006||Apr 5, 2011||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7955499||Mar 25, 2009||Jun 7, 2011||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US7959796||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 14, 2011||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8025794||Dec 16, 2004||Sep 27, 2011||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8070937||Dec 16, 2004||Dec 6, 2011||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8137536||Jun 1, 2011||Mar 20, 2012||Shell Oil Company||Method for producing a crude product|
|US8241489||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 14, 2012||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8475651||Mar 25, 2009||Jul 2, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8481450||Mar 9, 2011||Jul 9, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8506794||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 13, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8608938||Apr 14, 2011||Dec 17, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Crude product composition|
|US8608946||Dec 16, 2004||Dec 17, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US8613851||Apr 14, 2011||Dec 24, 2013||Shell Oil Company||Crude product composition|
|US8663453||Apr 14, 2011||Mar 4, 2014||Shell Oil Company||Crude product composition|
|US8764972||Jul 30, 2009||Jul 1, 2014||Shell Oil Company||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050133414 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 23, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050133417 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 23, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050139519 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 30, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050139522 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jun 30, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050145543 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jul 7, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050167320 *||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 4, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050167327 *||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 4, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050167332 *||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 4, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050173301 *||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 11, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20050173303 *||Dec 16, 2004||Aug 11, 2005||Bhan Opinder K.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20060231457 *||Apr 7, 2006||Oct 19, 2006||Bhan Opinder K||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20060249430 *||Apr 6, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Mesters Carolus Matthias A M||Process for reducing the total acid number (TAN) of a liquid hydrocarbonaceous feedstock|
|US20070000808 *||Jun 22, 2006||Jan 4, 2007||Bhan Opinder K||Method and catalyst for producing a crude product having selected properties|
|US20070000810 *||Jun 22, 2006||Jan 4, 2007||Bhan Opinder K||Method for producing a crude product with reduced tan|
|US20070000811 *||Jun 22, 2006||Jan 4, 2007||Bhan Opinder K||Method and catalyst for producing a crude product with minimal hydrogen uptake|
|US20070295646 *||Jun 20, 2007||Dec 27, 2007||Bhan Opinder K||Method for producing a crude product with a long-life catalyst|
|US20090188836 *||Oct 3, 2007||Jul 30, 2009||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Methods for producing a crude product|
|US20090223867 *||Mar 4, 2009||Sep 10, 2009||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Catalyst and process for the selective hydrodesulfurization of an olefin containing hydrocarbon feedstock|
|US20090283444 *||Jul 30, 2009||Nov 19, 2009||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20090288989 *||Jul 30, 2009||Nov 26, 2009||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|US20090308791 *||Jul 30, 2009||Dec 17, 2009||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Systems, methods, and cataylsts for producing a crude product|
|US20100055005 *||Nov 11, 2009||Mar 4, 2010||Opinder Kishan Bhan||System for producing a crude product|
|US20110192763 *||Apr 14, 2011||Aug 11, 2011||Scott Lee Wellington||Crude product composition|
|US20110226671 *||Jun 1, 2011||Sep 22, 2011||Opinder Kishan Bhan||Method for producing a crude product|
|EP0074425A1 *||Sep 14, 1981||Mar 23, 1983||Engelhard Corporation||Catalytic cracking of metal contaminated mineral oil fractions|
|EP0683218A2||May 18, 1995||Nov 22, 1995||Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.||Process for the conversion of a residual hydrocarbon oil|
|EP1993729B1 *||Mar 9, 2007||Sep 23, 2015||Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.||Method for preparing a catalyst for hydrotreating process|
|WO1993021283A1 *||Apr 7, 1993||Oct 28, 1993||Union Oil Company Of California||Demetallation catalyst|
|WO2005061668A2 *||Dec 16, 2004||Jul 7, 2005||Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|WO2005061668A3 *||Dec 16, 2004||Nov 10, 2005||Shell Oil Co||Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product|
|WO2010084112A1||Jan 19, 2010||Jul 29, 2010||Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V.||Process for the hydro-demetallization of hydrocarbon feedstocks|
|U.S. Classification||208/89, 208/251.00H, 208/216.0PP, 208/216.00R|
|International Classification||B01J37/20, B01J23/76, B01J37/00, B01J35/00, C10G45/08, C10G65/12, B01J23/85, B01J35/10, C10G65/00, C10G45/02, B01J21/04, B01J21/00, B01J23/882|
|Cooperative Classification||B01J35/1042, C10G45/08, C10G65/12, B01J21/04, B01J35/1085, B01J23/882, B01J35/1014, B01J23/85, B01J37/20, B01J35/1038, B01J35/10, B01J35/1061|
|European Classification||C10G65/12, B01J23/85, C10G45/08, B01J37/20, B01J35/10|