|Publication number||US3901798 A|
|Publication date||Aug 26, 1975|
|Filing date||Nov 21, 1973|
|Priority date||Nov 21, 1973|
|Publication number||US 3901798 A, US 3901798A, US-A-3901798, US3901798 A, US3901798A|
|Inventors||Peterson Carl M|
|Original Assignee||Environmental Research Corp|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (72), Classifications (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent 11 1 Peterson Aug. 26, 1975 AEROSOL CONCENTRATOR AND CLASSIFIER  Inventor: Carl M. Peterson, St. Paul, Minn.
 Assignee: Environmental Research Corporation, St. Paul, Minn.
221 Filed: Nov. 21, 1913 1211 Appl. No.: 417,886
3,725,27l 4/l973 Giannotti 55/l7 X 3,731,464 5/l973 Brumbaugh et al. 209/l43 X 3,780,502 l2/l973 Dupre et al. 55/34l X 3,798,878 3/l974 Pausch 55/302 X FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS 1,593,451 7/l970 France 55/434 l,()l5,882 l/l966 United Kingdom 209/l45 Primary Examiner-Frank W. Lutter Assistant Examiner-Ralph J. Hill Attorney, Agent, or FirmDorsey, Marquart, Windhorst, West & Halladay  ABSTRACT An aerosol sampler which concentrates and classifies airborne particles. Particles in the size range of 0.1 10 microns are classified according to particle size by means of the particle inertia principle. The unique design reduces particle losses and is characterized by an annular passage in the flow path of the sample.
14 Claims, 7 Drawing Figures PATENTED AUGZEIQTS sum 2 u? 4 AEROSOL CONCENTRATOR AND CLASSIFIER BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The invention pertains to the field of analyzing particle laden (or polluted) air by measuring the concentration, size and size distribution of the suspended particles. It is useful in the detection of biological or radioactive particles suspended in the atmosphere, in the detection of biological contamination in hospitals, in the analysis of smoke stack emissions, in monitoring ambient conditions for pollution, and in classification of pigments according to particle size. In general the invention is useful in any field which requires the sampling, concentrating, or classifying according to particle size, of nonfibrous airborne particles within the size range of 0.1 microns.
The invention operates on the principle of particle inertia. Air with suspended particles is caused to flow along a path, and a portion of the airstream is deflected. The smaller particles with less mass and inertia negotiate the turn and continue along the deflected path. The larger particles (above the cutpoint) with greater mass and inertia fail to negotiate the turn and continue along the original direction of the airstream. Particles are thus separated or classified according to particle size.
The effect and persistence of particulate matter in the atmosphere is primarily dependent upon particle size. Reduction in atmospheric visibility, for example, is largely due to particles in the size range of 0.1 l microns. Where synergistic action has been observed with toxic gases, indications are that the effect is more pronounced when the particles are submicron in size. Particulates of definable particle size enhance atmospheric reactions and transformations of pollutant gases, exert an influence on radiation transfer of solar energy to the earth's surface, and may be responsible for inadvertent weather modification by nucleating cloud formation. Accordingly, air quality and source emission standards will likely be expressed in terms of the size of emitted particles and, consequently, means for measuring and classifying particles according to particle size will be required.
The principle of particle inertia has been used in prior art devices. The cascade impactors described by Hounam and Sherwood, and by Connor, for example, utilize this principle. In these, as well as other prior art devices, particle wall losses are significant, that is, 4045% particle loss or 55-60% efficiency is not uncommon when comparing what comes out with what goes in. In addition in prior art devices there is substantial particle bounce-off from the collected surfaces which distorts the particle size distribution of the sample collected. Moreover, the limited quantity of parti' cle mass which can be collected prior to particle reentrainment is another limitation of prior art devices, and the collection surface upon which the particles are collected in prior art devices is not readily amenable to a variety of analysis techniques including betaattenuation, culturing, microscopic examination, and
other methods. I. Hounam, R. F and Sherwood, R. 1., The Cascade Centripeter: A Device for Determining the Concentration and Size Distribution of Aerosols," American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 26: p. I22 [Mar-Apr, 1965) 2. Connor, W. D., An Inertial Type Particle Separator for Collecting Large Samples," Journal of the Air Pollution Control Asslxiation, [6: p. 35 (January I966) SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The primary advantage of the present invention is that particle losses are reduced to l5-20%, that is, the sampler operates at an efficiency in the range of -85%. In addition the present invention promotes efficient impingement and concentration of particles of various sizes into a given classification, that is, a more precise cutpoint for particles of various sizes results. The present invention also facilitates removal of the sample onto a defined filter media or area for analysis.
The invention is characterized by an annular passage disposed about and in the plane of a second orifice concentrically located in spaced relationship downstream from a first orifice.
More particularly, the invention may be summarized as apparatus for classifying airborne particles according to particle size including a first plate which defines a first orifice. A second plate spaced from the first plate defines a second orifice larger than and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the first orifice. The second orifice is downstream from the first. Tubular means, also downstream from the first orifice, disposed substantially in the plane of the second orifice, directed toward, substantially the size of, and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the first orifice, defines a third orifice and an annular passage between the second orifice and tubular means. This annular passage is the critical element in the present invention and distinguishes it from prior art devices. A pressure gradient, decreasing in pressure from the first orifice to the annular passage and third orifice is provided to induce flow through the first orifice and the third orifice and the annular passage. In the embodiment shown the first orifice, the third orifice, and the annular passage are circular.
The invention may be practiced in a plurality of stages. For this purpose, second stage classification apparatus may be disposed in the airstream that passes through the third orifice in the first stage. Additional stages may also be provided.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the preferred embodiment showing the intake section, the first stage section, the second stage section, and the blower section.
FIG. 2 is a top view of the aerosol sampler shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view of the present invention taken on the line 3-3 of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 is a horizontal sectional view taken on the line 44 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a horizontal sectional view taken on the line 55 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 6 is an enlarged, schematic, vertical sectional view of the classification zone of the present invention. The relative size and relationship of the critical elements is shown.
FIG. 7 is an enlarged, schematic, vertical sectional view similar to FIG. 6 and shows a second stage classification section.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT The general nature of the present invention may be readily understood with reference to FIG. 1. Ambient air to be concentrated and classified enters the aerosol sampler at intake section 11. The sample passes downwardly through first stage section 13 in which fractionation occurs and then through second stage section 14 in which further fractionation occurs. The sample fraction is collected in second stage section 14. The balance and major volumetric portion of the airstream passes through blower section 15, and exits from the apparatus at exhaust cylinder 16. Timer 17 serves to record the length of time of operation of the apparatus or the length of time over which the sample is collected. The classification of particles in the airstream is brought about between intake section 11 and exhaust cylinder 16 in a manner described in detail below.
The detailed design and construction of the present invention may be readily understood with reference primarily to FIGS. 2-6. With reference first to FIG. 3, intake section 11 includes flow containment collar 20 which is generally cylindrical and flanged at one end. With continued reference to FIG. 3, first stage section 13 includes cylindrical housing 21 which is internally flanged at its upper edge and externally flanged at its lower edge. Nozzle orifice plate 22, guide plate 23, separation plate 24, and first stage collecting cavity housing 25 complete the basic elements in first stage section 13. Nozzle orifice plate 22 defines a series of spaced orifices 26 shown in both FIGS. 3 and 4. Orifices 26, which constitute the first orifice in the path of the airstream, are radially disposed about the vertical axis of sampler l0 and, in the preferred embodiment shown, number 30. A similar number of orifices 27 are provided in guide plate 23. These orifices 27 are larger than and concentrically disposed with respect to nozzle orifices 26, and are spaced downstream therefrom. Orifices 27 constitute the second orifice in the path of the airstream. A similar number of tubular or third orifices 28 are defined by separation plate 24 as best seen in FIG. 3. The third orifices 28 are spaced from first orifices 26, downstream therefrom, and are disposed concentrically with respect thereto in the plane of second orifices 27. The wall of tubular orifices 28 is sufficiently thin so that the outside diameter of the tubular portion is less than the diameter of the second orifices 27. Thus, an annular passage 30 is formed between second orifice 27 and the outer wall of third or tubular orifice 28. This annular passage 30 may be seen with reference to FIGS. 3, 5 and 6 and characterize the invention.
First stage collection cavity housing 25 has an open top surface and defines air cavity 31 which serves as a confinement area for that portion of the airstream and fractionated airborne particles which pass through each third orifice 28. First stage collecting cavity 25, together with first stage cylindrical housing 21, defines an annular cavity 32 which serves as a confinement area for that portion or fraction of the airstream and airborne particles which pass through each annular passage 30.
Intake section 11 is mounted to first stage section 13 by means of screws 35. Nozzle orifice plate 22, gasket 29, guide plate 23, and separation plate 24, are held in the requisite relationship and connected to first stage collection cavity housing 25 by means of screws 36.
Second stage section 14 begins with mounting plate 40 and separation plate 41 which defines large unrestricted passages 42. Sample collector 43, sample collector mounting sleeve 44, and second stage cylindrical housing 45 are also provided in second stage section 14. Cylindrical housing 45, formed from rigid transparent material, is mounted to separation plate 41 and mounting plate 40 by means of screws 46 which extend through lower separation plate 47 and are threaded into mounting plate 40. Second stage section 14 is mounted to first stage section 13 by means of mounting plate 40 which is mounted and sealed to the lower flange of first stage cylindrical housing 21 by means of screws 50 and O-ring 51.
Liquid or culture medium input tube 53 extends through second stage cylindrical housing 45 and connects with sample collector 43 at mounting tube 54. Sample collection tube 55 extends from downwardly projecting mounting tube 56 of sample collector 43 and outwardly through second stage cylindrical housing 45, as best seen in FIG. 3.
The second stage concentration and classification occurs at secondary orifices 60 disposed in the bottom plate portion of first stage collection cavity housing 25. Concentrically disposed second stage orifices 61 in the upper portion of the sample collector 43, along with annular passage 32, serve to classify the airstream further, that is, accomplish a secondary classification, as the once fractionated airstream from air cavity 31 passes through orifices 60 and is further concentrated and classified. A portion of the stream passes into annular cavity 32 and through large unrestricted passages 42, while the other portion passes through orifices 61 into sample collector 43. It may be noted at this point that the secondary concentration and classification shown in FIG. 3 does not include the characteristic annular passage described above in connection with the first stage classification. While not shown, a similar secondary classification structure could be provided in the second stage and, moreover, such an arrangement is shown schematically in FIG. 7.
With continued reference to FIG. 3, blower section 15 includes cylindrical blower housing 70, under separation plate 71 which defines a centrally disposed unrestricted passage 72, squirrel cage 73 keyed to drive shaft 74, intermediate separation plate 75 which defines unrestricted passage 76, motor 77, and bottom plate 78. Bottom plate 78 is mounted to cylindrical blower housing by means of the screws 79. Exhaust cylinder 16, formed integrally with cylindrical blower housing 70, completes blower section 15. A conventional timer 17 (shown in FIG. 1) is mounted to blower housing 70 to record the length of time over which the sample is collected.
The relative size of the critical parts of the invention may be best understood with reference to FIG. 6. The same reference numerals used in describing the preferred embodiment of FIGS. 1-5 are applied to the corresponding elements shown schematically in FIG. 6. With reference to FIG. 6, the distance, 1), between first plate 22 and second plate 23 should be 0.3 3 times the diameter, (1,, of first orifice 26. The width, w, of annular passage 30 should be equal to or less than one-half the diameter, d,, of first orifice 26. The diameter, d of third orifice 28 should be equal to or slightly less than the diameter, (1,, of first orifice 26. The diameter of second orifice 27, and the wall thickness of tubular orifice 28, should be such that the area of the annular passage 30 is 0.6 l times the area of third orifice 28. The thickness, 1, of first plate 22 should be less than the diameter, d,, of first orifice 26. For a concentration ratio (by volume) of 8:1, the area of annular passage 30 should be 0.8 times the area of third orifice 28. For fractionation of particles in the size range of 0.1 l microns, the diameter, d,, of first orifice 26 should be in the range of 0.2 0.5 inches.
For a 50% cutpoint of 1.5 microns, the diameter, d;, of first orifice 26 should be 0. l 36 inches. The pressure, P,,,,,,, in annular passage 30 and annular cavity 32 should be l6l8 inches of water less than atmospheric pressure, P The pressure, P in third orifice 28 and first stage collection cavity 31 should be only slightly less than atmospheric, that is, 0. l 0.2 inches of water less than atmospheric, P Under the foregoing conditions, the velocity of the airstream passing through first orifice 26 is approximately 6,200 centimeters per second. The volumetric through-put is about 35 cfm. Those skilled in the art may choose a blower and motor of appropriate size and capacity to achieve these conditions.
I. A 50% cutpoint of 1.5 microns means that 50% of the L micron sized particles pass from first orifice 26 directly through third orifice 28 into first stage collection cavity 3], and 50% of the L5 micron particles pass through annular passage into annular cavity 32. Particles larger than 1.5 microns pass directly through third orifice 28 in in' creasing percentages above 50% and through annular passage 30 in decreasing percentages below 50%. The percentage of particles in a size range greater than [.5 microns flowing through third orifice 28 increases with the increase in particle size, and the percentage of particles smaller than l.5 microns which pass through annular passage 30 increases as particle size decreases.
The operation of the invention may be best understood with reference to H6. 7. A two stage classifier is shown schematically in FIG. 7 and the elements or components are assigned reference numerals identical to the numerals assigned to the corresponding elements or components shown or described in connection with the preferred embodiment in FIGS. 1-5. Due to the pressure gradient referred to above in the description of the preferred embodiment, ambient air, that is, the air to be sampled, is drawn into intake section 11 and into orifices 27. At this point fractionation occurs. A portion of the airstream, that is, approximately 80-90% by volume of the airstream, is deflected and passes through annular passage 30 into annular cavity 32. The balance of the airstream, that is, -20% by volume, passes directly from first orifice 27 through third orifice 28 and into first stage collecting cavity 31. The difference in volume when comparing the volume of the airstream passing through annular passage 30 with the volume passing through third orifice 28 is due to the substantial difference between the pressure in annular cavity 32 and first stage collection cavity 31. In other words, the pressure gradient from first orifice 27 to am nular passage 30 and annular cavity 32 is substantial, whereas the pressure gradient between first orifice 27 and third orifice 28 is slight. Fractionation occurs as the airstream is deflected from a path directly from first orifice 27 through third orifice 28 with a substantial portion passing through annular passage 30. At this point particles above the cutpoint continue along a path without deflection and in first stage collection cav ity 3]. Particles below the cutpoint negotiate the turn, due to their smaller mass and inertia, and pass through annular passage 30 and enter annular cavity 32, Further fractionation occurs at second stage orifice 60. The nature of the classification in the second stage is identical to that in the first. The fraction of air in annular cavity 32 resulting from both first and second stage classification is discharged through exhaust cylinder 16. The sample fraction is collected on sample collector 43 and analyzed. Analysis may be carried out by beta-attenuation, by culturing the sample, and by other means known to those skilled in the art.
I claim as my invention: 1. Apparatus for classifying airborne particles ac- 5 cording to particle size which comprises:
a first plate defining a first orifice;
a second plate spaced from the first plate and defining a second orifice larger than and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the first orifice;
tubular means defining a third orifice disposed substantially in the plane of the second orifice, directed toward, substantially the size of, and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the first orifice, to thereby define an annular passage between the second orifice and the tubular means;
means for establishing communication between said first orifice, on the one hand, and said third orifice and said annular passage, on the other hand;
an outlet for returning air passing through said annular passage to the atmosphere;
means for establishing communication between said annular passage and said outlet; and
collecting means communicating with the third orifice for collecting the particles passing therethrough.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 and means for providing a pressure gradient decreasing in pressure from the first orifice to the annular passage and the third orifice.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first orifice is substantially circular.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein the spacing between the first plate and the second plate of 0.3 3 times the diameter of the first orifice.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the distance between the annular passage and the third orifice is equal to or less than one-half the diameter of the first orifice.
6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the area of the annular passage is 0.6 1 times the area of the first orifice.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein the thickness of the first plate is less than or equal to the diameter of the first orifice.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 and secondary stage classifying means comprising:
a secondary first plate defining a secondary first orifice disposed in the path of the particles after passage through the third orifice and prior to entrance into the collecting means;
means for establishing communication between said third orifice and said secondary first orifice;
a secondary second plate spaced from the secondary 55 first plate and defining a secondary second orifice larger than and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the secondary first orifice; and
secondary tubular means defining a secondary third orifice communicating with the collecting means and disposed substantially in the plane of the secondary second orifice, directed toward, substantially the size of, and substantially concentrically disposed with respect to the secondary first orifice to thereby define a secondary annular passage between the secondary second orifice and the secondary tubular means;
means for establishing communication between said secondary first orifice, on the one hand, and said secondary third orifice and said secondary annular passage, on the other hand; and means for establishing communication between said secondary annular passage and said outlet. 9. The apparatus of claim 8 and means for providing a pressure gradient decreasing in pressure from the first orifice to the annular passage and the third orifice, from the third orifice to the secondary first orifice, and from the secondary first orifice to the secondary annular passage and the secondary third orifice.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the secondary first orifice is substantially circular.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the spacing between the secondary first plate and the secondary second plate is 0.3 3 times the diameter of the secondary first orifice.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the distance between the secondary annular passage and the secondary third orifice is equal to or less than one-half the diameter of the first orifice.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the area of the annular passage is 0.6 1 times the area of the secondary first orifice.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein the thickness of the secondary first plate is less than or equal to the diameter of the secondary first orifice.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2289474 *||May 18, 1937||Jul 14, 1942||American Blower Corp||Apparatus for dust collection|
|US2932394 *||Apr 14, 1958||Apr 12, 1960||Holton Mcginn John||Ballistic particle size discriminator|
|US3288285 *||Jul 9, 1963||Nov 29, 1966||Gen Mills Inc||Air classifier|
|US3725271 *||Nov 24, 1970||Apr 3, 1973||Giannotti Ass||Apparatus and method for separating particles from a flow of fluid|
|US3731464 *||Jan 19, 1971||May 8, 1973||Us Army||Continuous aerosol concentrator|
|US3780502 *||Jan 12, 1973||Dec 25, 1973||Nat Foundry Equip Co Inc||Collector apparatus|
|US3798878 *||Aug 18, 1972||Mar 26, 1974||Gen Resource Corp||Filter cleaning apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4159942 *||Sep 22, 1977||Jul 3, 1979||Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.||Method and apparatus for separating particles|
|US4301002 *||Mar 27, 1980||Nov 17, 1981||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||High efficiency virtual impactor|
|US4457844 *||May 12, 1983||Jul 3, 1984||Beard Harold J||Continuous waste water clarification process|
|US4670135 *||Jun 27, 1986||Jun 2, 1987||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||High volume virtual impactor|
|US4972957 *||Sep 27, 1988||Nov 27, 1990||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Particle concentrating sampler|
|US5332550 *||Aug 2, 1993||Jul 26, 1994||United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority||Aerosol sampler|
|US6010554 *||Jun 23, 1997||Jan 4, 2000||Battelle Memorial Institute||Micro-machined virtual impactor and method of operation|
|US6062392 *||Nov 13, 1998||May 16, 2000||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Micromachined virtual impactor|
|US6120573 *||Nov 13, 1998||Sep 19, 2000||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Micromachined teardrop-shaped virtual impactor|
|US6431014 *||Jul 23, 1999||Aug 13, 2002||Msp Corporation||High accuracy aerosol impactor and monitor|
|US6647758||Dec 8, 2000||Nov 18, 2003||Msp Corporation||Method and apparatus for verifying integrity of cascade impactors|
|US6695146||Sep 17, 2001||Feb 24, 2004||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Method for surface deposition of concentrated airborne particles|
|US6698592||Jul 22, 2002||Mar 2, 2004||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Virtual impactor|
|US6938777||Feb 11, 2003||Sep 6, 2005||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Method for removing surface deposits of concentrated collected particles|
|US7045015||Jan 17, 2003||May 16, 2006||Optomec Design Company||Apparatuses and method for maskless mesoscale material deposition|
|US7108894||Feb 5, 2002||Sep 19, 2006||Optomec Design Company||Direct Write™ System|
|US7265669||Mar 1, 2004||Sep 4, 2007||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Networks with sensors for air safety and security|
|US7270844||Sep 20, 2004||Sep 18, 2007||Optomec Design Company||Direct write™ system|
|US7294366||Sep 27, 2004||Nov 13, 2007||Optomec Design Company||Laser processing for heat-sensitive mesoscale deposition|
|US7485345||Dec 22, 2005||Feb 3, 2009||Optomec Design Company||Apparatuses and methods for maskless mesoscale material deposition|
|US7578973||Mar 1, 2004||Aug 25, 2009||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Devices for continuous sampling of airborne particles using a regenerative surface|
|US7591980||Mar 1, 2004||Sep 22, 2009||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Biological alarm|
|US7658163||Jul 20, 2006||Feb 9, 2010||Optomec Design Company||Direct write# system|
|US7674671||Dec 12, 2005||Mar 9, 2010||Optomec Design Company||Aerodynamic jetting of aerosolized fluids for fabrication of passive structures|
|US7759123||Mar 21, 2006||Jul 20, 2010||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Removing surface deposits of concentrated collected particles|
|US7799567||Jul 18, 2006||Sep 21, 2010||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Air sampler based on virtual impaction and actual impaction|
|US7875095||May 22, 2008||Jan 25, 2011||Enertechnix, Inc||Skimmer for concentrating an aerosol|
|US7938079||Dec 13, 2004||May 10, 2011||Optomec Design Company||Annular aerosol jet deposition using an extended nozzle|
|US7938341||Dec 12, 2005||May 10, 2011||Optomec Design Company||Miniature aerosol jet and aerosol jet array|
|US7987813||Jan 6, 2009||Aug 2, 2011||Optomec, Inc.||Apparatuses and methods for maskless mesoscale material deposition|
|US8047053||May 9, 2008||Nov 1, 2011||Icx Technologies, Inc.||Mail parcel screening using multiple detection technologies|
|US8104362||Jan 7, 2009||Jan 31, 2012||Texas A&M University System||In-line virtual impactor|
|US8110247||May 8, 2006||Feb 7, 2012||Optomec Design Company||Laser processing for heat-sensitive mesoscale deposition of oxygen-sensitive materials|
|US8132744||Apr 15, 2010||Mar 13, 2012||Optomec, Inc.||Miniature aerosol jet and aerosol jet array|
|US8173431||Nov 9, 2006||May 8, 2012||Flir Systems, Inc.||Mail screening to detect mail contaminated with biological harmful substances|
|US8243274||Mar 9, 2010||Aug 14, 2012||Flir Systems, Inc.||Portable diesel particulate monitor|
|US8272579||Sep 2, 2008||Sep 25, 2012||Optomec, Inc.||Mechanically integrated and closely coupled print head and mist source|
|US8299449 *||Aug 20, 2007||Oct 30, 2012||Fai Instruments S.R.L.||Apparatus and method for environmental monitoring|
|US8455051||Dec 22, 2010||Jun 4, 2013||Optomec, Inc.||Apparatuses and methods for maskless mesoscale material deposition|
|US8459572||Oct 22, 2010||Jun 11, 2013||Aerosol Dynamics Inc.||Focusing particle concentrator with application to ultrafine particles|
|US8539840||May 2, 2011||Sep 24, 2013||Enertechnix, Inc||Aerosol collection apparatus and methods|
|US8640975||Jan 14, 2010||Feb 4, 2014||Optomec, Inc.||Miniature aerosol jet and aerosol jet array|
|US8796146||Mar 9, 2010||Aug 5, 2014||Optomec, Inc.||Aerodynamic jetting of blended aerosolized materials|
|US8887658||Oct 8, 2008||Nov 18, 2014||Optomec, Inc.||Multiple sheath multiple capillary aerosol jet|
|US8966958 *||Jul 2, 2010||Mar 3, 2015||The Governors Of The University Of Alberta||Particle classifier|
|US9114409||Sep 25, 2012||Aug 25, 2015||Optomec, Inc.||Mechanically integrated and closely coupled print head and mist source|
|US9192054||Sep 2, 2008||Nov 17, 2015||Optomec, Inc.||Apparatus for anisotropic focusing|
|US20030020768 *||Jan 30, 2002||Jan 30, 2003||Renn Michael J.||Direct write TM system|
|US20030048314 *||Feb 5, 2002||Mar 13, 2003||Optomec Design Company||Direct write TM system|
|US20030228124 *||Jan 17, 2003||Dec 11, 2003||Renn Michael J.||Apparatuses and method for maskless mesoscale material deposition|
|US20040028620 *||Nov 21, 2001||Feb 12, 2004||Andre Monnot||Separation of living particles from a gas under pressure|
|US20040179808 *||Oct 21, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Optomec Design Company||Particle guidance system|
|US20040232052 *||Mar 1, 2004||Nov 25, 2004||Call Charles John||Methods and devices for continuous sampling of airborne particles using a regenerative surface|
|US20050046664 *||Sep 20, 2004||Mar 3, 2005||Optomec Design Company||Direct writeTM system|
|US20050129383 *||Sep 27, 2004||Jun 16, 2005||Optomec Design Company||Laser processing for heat-sensitive mesoscale deposition|
|US20050156991 *||Sep 27, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Optomec Design Company||Maskless direct write of copper using an annular aerosol jet|
|US20050163917 *||Aug 9, 2004||Jul 28, 2005||Optomec Design Company||Direct writeTM system|
|US20050190058 *||Mar 1, 2004||Sep 1, 2005||Call Charles J.||Networks with sensors for air safety and security|
|US20060008590 *||Dec 13, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||Optomec Design Company||Annular aerosol jet deposition using an extended nozzle|
|US20060117872 *||Feb 28, 2005||Jun 8, 2006||Rupprecht & Patashnick Company, Inc.||High-flow rate, low-noise, gas sampling apparatus and methods for collecting particulate in a gas|
|US20060163570 *||Dec 12, 2005||Jul 27, 2006||Optomec Design Company||Aerodynamic jetting of aerosolized fluids for fabrication of passive structures|
|US20070019028 *||May 8, 2006||Jan 25, 2007||Optomec Design Company||Laser processing for heat-sensitive mesoscale deposition of oxygen-sensitive materials|
|US20070048186 *||Mar 21, 2006||Mar 1, 2007||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Removing surface deposits of concentrated collected particles|
|US20080013299 *||Jul 18, 2007||Jan 17, 2008||Optomec, Inc.||Direct Patterning for EMI Shielding and Interconnects Using Miniature Aerosol Jet and Aerosol Jet Array|
|US20080314214 *||Sep 3, 2008||Dec 25, 2008||Klaus Tank||Composite diamond compacts|
|US20090288475 *||May 22, 2008||Nov 26, 2009||Enertechnix, Inc.||Skimmer for Concentrating an Aerosol|
|US20100163761 *||Aug 20, 2007||Jul 1, 2010||Antonio Febo||Apparatus and method for environmental monitoring|
|US20100186524 *||Feb 3, 2009||Jul 29, 2010||Enertechnix, Inc||Aerosol Collection and Microdroplet Delivery for Analysis|
|US20100255560 *||Apr 2, 2010||Oct 7, 2010||Mesosystems Technology, Inc.||Method and apparatus for capturing viable biological particles over an extended period of time|
|US20120096924 *||Jul 2, 2010||Apr 26, 2012||The Governors Of The University Of Alberta||Particle classifier|
|US20140020349 *||Sep 23, 2013||Jan 23, 2014||U.S. Environmental Protection Agency||Multi-filter chemical speciation sampler and virtual impaction particle separation inlet therefore|
|DE4325664A1 *||Jul 30, 1993||Feb 2, 1995||Fraunhofer Ges Forschung||Staubsammelvorrichtung|
|U.S. Classification||209/143, 73/865.5, 73/865|
|International Classification||B07B7/02, B07B7/00|