|Publication number||US3911389 A|
|Publication date||Oct 7, 1975|
|Filing date||Mar 21, 1974|
|Priority date||Mar 21, 1974|
|Publication number||US 3911389 A, US 3911389A, US-A-3911389, US3911389 A, US3911389A|
|Inventors||Mills Milton K|
|Original Assignee||Us Transport|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (21), Classifications (8)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
O United States Patent 11 1 [111 3,911,389
Mills 14 1 06. 7, 1975 MAGNETIC GRADIENT VEHICLE DETECTOR Primary Examiner-Thomas B. Habecker  Inventor: Milton K. Mills, Washington DC. Attorney, Agent, or FirmHerbert E. Farmer; Harold P. Deeley, Jr.  Assignee: The United States of America as w represented by the Secretary of the 57 ABSTRACT 1 r fsfii fg: olgrlgansportauon A metallic object detection apparatus is disclosed. The g detection apparatus comprises a transmitter which ra-  Filed: Mar. 21, 1974 diatcs electromagnetic energy to a receiving means which has a substantially zero voltage induced therein 2 Appl' 453332 when a metallic object is not magnetically coupled to the transmitter and the receiving means. When a me-  US. Cl. 340/38 L; 340/258 C tallic object becomes magnetically coupled to the  G080 1/00 electromagnetic field radiating from the transmitter,  Field of Search 340/38 L eddy currents are induced in the metallic structure of the metallic object which in turn induce a non zero  References Cited voltage within the receiving means. The transmitter is UNITED STATES PATENTS constructed from a non-distributed element which 2 064 882 12/1936 Brainerd 340/38 L prodices a dipole like electromalgllefic field 217511150 6/1956 Buccicone 340/38 L Put slgna] Produced by the recevmg means ampl 3,436,649 4/1969 Takechi 340/38 L fled and applied to either a Phase responsive and/0r 3,500,310 3/1970 Marcinkiewicz 340/38 L amplitude responsive indicating means to Signal when 3,57l,789 3/1971 Midlock 340/38 L an object has Caused the inducement of a non Zero FOREIGN PATENTS OR APPLICATIONS Voltage the recevng means' 45-4157 2/1970 Japan 340 38 L 11 Claims, 10 Drawing Figures ELECTROSTATIC SHIELDS IL] LONGITUDINALLY SLOTTED 1' MAGNETIC SHIELD AMPLITUDE '58 l RELAY AND/OR 50 T LEVEL SIGNAL I L SENSOR DETECTOR 52 0 12 1 1 00151111 CURRENT AMP.
OSCILLATOR ::\|NNER sumo 0F TRIAX OUTER SHIELD 0F TRIAX US. Patent Oct. 7,1975 Sheet 1 of5 3,911,389
U.S. Patent Oct. 7,1975 Sheet 2 of 5 3,911,389
OUTER SHIELD 0F TRIAX Q w w W m u. mavwmfia FIG. 38
US. Patent Oct. 7,1975
Sheet 3 of 5 FIG. 30
US. Patent Oct. 7,1975 SheetS of5 3,911,389
PHASE SHIFT (DEG) 7/ |7.5FT. LOOP I r l 1 1 I I "W -l2 "l0 "8 "6 "Z 0 Z L} 6 8 l0 I2 IQ VEHICLE LONGITUDINAL POSITION (FT) MAGNETIC GRADIENT VEHICLE DETECTOR BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention In its broadest sense, the invention relates to an apparatus for detecting metallic objects. In a more limited sense, the invention relates to a vehicle detection apparatus of the type which senses vehicles by detecting variations in the coupling of a magnetic field between a transmitter and a receiver caused by the induction of eddy currents within the metallic structure of the vehicle. While this apparatus has utility for detecting any metallic object, it has particular utility in the field of vehicle detection for purposes of traffic control, traffic identification and traffic classification.
2. Description of the Prior Art One type of vehicle detection system is the inductive loop detector as disclosed in US. Pat. No. 3,493,954. This apparatus has a large wire loop which is embedded within pavement where it is desired to sense vehicle presence. The terminals of the inductive loop are coupled to one leg of an inductive bridge. Magnetic coupling of a vehicle to the wire loop causes a change in the inductance of the wire loop which imbalances the inductive bridge. This imbalance is detected as vehicle presence. lnductive loop detectors have a number of inherent major disadvantages. First, the installation costs are extremely high and will tend to increase with rising labor rates. Second, the signal to noise ratio of inductive loop detectors is not sufficient to allow loop detectors to be direct coupled to permit detection of stopped vehicles.
I A second type of vehicle detector as disclosed in US. Pat. No. 3,052,869, utilizes a distributed element transmission line to radiate an electromagnetic field which is sensed by a first pair of coils disposed in close proximity to different sections of the distributed element transmission line. Unlike the instant invention, each of the receiving coils is coupled in series with a second coil and a rectification circuit. The distributed element transmission line is coupled in series with a third pair of coils, each of the third coils being magnetically coupled to a different one of the second coils. This construction has the major disadvantage of having the receiver coils nulled by combining a sample of the transmitted signal with the signal detected by each receiving coil. A slight change in the physical position of one of the receiving coils will imbalance the null since the transmitter reference voltage will not track the receiver coil voltage change. Additionally, each of the output tributed element transmission line transmitter. A major disadvantage of the distributed element transmission line transmitter is that the conductors must be comprised of widely spaced wires similar to a long inductive loop to sense high bed vehicles (i.e., the near magnetic field of closely spaced transmission line conductors is tightly confined to the transmission line and induces negligible current in a conducting object two or more conductor spacings away). The non distributed element transmitter used in the instant invention is entirely different than the distributed element transmission line transmitter of the referenced patent. The difference in size between the two transmitters enables the much smaller transmitter of the instant invention to be installed at a much smaller installation cost.
A third type of vehicle detection system is disclosed in US. Pat. No. 2,144,535. The vehicle detection system disclosed therein consists of a pair of transmitter coils wound on diagonally opposite legs of a pair of elongated laminated open cores. A pair of receiver coils are wound on the remaining legs of the laminated cores. The cores are shaped with upturned ends to shorten the air gap between the ends to lower the reluctance of the magnetic circuits of each of the laminated cores. The coupling of a vehicle with the magnetic field emanating from the pair of diagonally opposed transmitter coils produces a change in the reluctance of the magnetic circuit coupling the transmitter coils to the receiver coils. This change in reluctance in the magnetic circuit coupling the transmitter and receiver windings causes the output voltage induced in the receiver coils to vary. Variation of the output voltage outside a pair of limits is detected as .the presence of a vehicle. The mode of operation of the invention disclosed in the foregoing patent is fundamentally different from the instant invention. Namely, in the instant invention, eddy currents produced in the body of a vehicle are magnetically coupled to the transmitter and receiving coils to cause the induction of a non zero voltage in the magnetically phase opposed receiving coils. In the referenced patent, because ofthe low frequency of the current used for driving the transmitter coils, the detection of a vehicle is not basedup on the induction of eddy currents within the metallic structure of the .vehicle being detected. Detection of metallic objects by induction of eddy currents within the metallic structure of the object has a number of advantages over the detection of metallic objectsby inducing a non zero voltage in a pair of receiver coils which function as the secondary windings of a transformer. First the physical size of the transformers required in the referenced patent is extremely large which would result in a high cost of installation in the road bed. Second, the output voltages induced in the secondary windings of the pair of transformers in the referenced patent are not in phase opposition to each other to produce a nulled output signal when a vehicle is notbeing detectedThird, a vehicle may induce a voltage within the secondary windings of the transformer which is between the two thresholds resulting in points of non detection.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The disadvantages and limitations of the prior art are solved by the instant invention which provides a simple and reliable means for detecting metallic objects such as vehicles. An alternating current generator is coupled to a transmitter to cause radiation of an electromagnetic field therefrom. A pair of series connected receiving coils, having their axes disposed in parallel and would in magnetic phase opposition to each other, are magnetically coupled to the transmitter. The magnetic field radiated by the transmitter induces eddy currents within the metallic structure of the object being de-' tected. The resultant magnetic field produced by the eddy currents within the object induces unequal voltages in the receiving coils. This non zero voltage is detected by a phase responsive and/or amplitude responsive indicating means to signal the presence of a vehicle. The phase responsive system utilizes a phase detector to compare the phase of the voltage induced in the receiving coils with the phase of the signal coupled to the transmitter. The output of the phase detector is coupled to an integration circuit which sums the net output voltage from the phase detector. The output signal from the integration circuit is threshold detected to drive a relay circuit which is adapted to be coupled to a signaling device. The amplitude responsive circuit comprises a rectification circuit which rectifies the output signal of the receiving coils. The output signal from the rectification circuit is threshold detected to produce a control signal for driving a relay which is adapted to be connected to a signaling device. A longitudinally slotted magnetic shield is disposed around a section of triaxial transmission line which is located closest to the transmitter to cancel the induction of interference within the transmission line. Separate electrostatic shields may be provided around each of the receiver coils and the transmitter to prevent the displacement of charges within the pavement where the instant invention is buried to prevent the induction of interference within the receiving coils. Different sections of triaxial transmission line respectively couple the transmitter to the alternating current generator and the receiving coils to the indicating means. Appropriate impedance matching elements are respectively provided to match the characteristic impedance of the two triaxial transmission line sections with the input impedance of the transmitter and the output impedance of the series connected receiving coils. Any number of spatial orientations of the receiving coils may be used as long as a zero level output signal isproduced when a vehicle is not present.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a view of the environment of the preferred use of the instant invention;
FIG. 2 is an electrical schematic block diagram of the instant invention;
FIGS. 3u-3e are views of some of the possible transmitter and. receiver coil orientations of the instant invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph of induced receiver coil voltage versus infinite plane height; V
FIG. 5 is the measured amplitude/phase signature of the instant invention for a Volkswagon; and
FIG. 6 is an illustration of the measured vehicle phase signature of the instant invention versus that of an inductive loop detector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION FIG. 1 shows the preferred field of use of the instant invention. As may be seen from inspection of FIG. 1, the invention 11 is installed transverse to the direction of traffic flow in proximity to an intersection where it buried just below the surface of the roadway in a closed box having nominal dimensions of 82 inches X 1.5 inches O.5 inches.
Referring to FIG. 2, l0 designates the electrical schematic block diagram of the invention. A crystal oscillator I2 having a preferred frequency of oscillation of KHZ has its output coupled to a constant current power amplifier 14 of conventional construction. The output of power amplifier 14 which is' a conventional construction is coupled to transmitter 18 via a section of triaxial cable 16. It is to be emphasized that transmitter 18 comprises a non-distributed element transmitter. In terms of the specification and the appended claims, non-distributed element transmitter defines a type of transmitter which physically is.not used for the function of transferring electrical energy between different transmitter locations which have magnetic fields isolated from each other. The only function of the nondistributed element transmitter used in the invention is to radiate electromagnetic energy from a single location. The respective physical ends of transmitter 18 have magnetic fields which are coupled to each other. Because of the small physical size of the nondistributed element transmitter 18 (prefcrrably four inches in length), the electromagnetic energy radiates therefrom in a field pattern similar to that produced by a dipole. The non-distributed element transmitter is superior to a distributed element transmission line transmitter because of its small size and concomitant small installation cost. The transmitter 18 comprises a ferrite core 20 having a coil wound thereon. Capacitors 24, 26
and 28 are provided to match the characteristic impedance of triaxial transmission line 16 to the input impedance of transmitter 18. The outside sheath of triaxial transmission line 16 is grounded only at amplifier 14 to couple any charges flowing therein to ground. A pair of receivers 30 and 34 respectively having coils 32 and 36 serially connected and wound in magnetic phase opposition to each other are magnetically coupled to the field radiating from trasmitter 18. The coils 32 and 36 have their axes parallel to each other. Receiver 30 consists of a RF choke 32. Receiver 34 consists of coil 36 and associated ferrite core 38. Capacitors 40, 42 and 44 are used to match the output impedance of the serially connected coils 32 and 36 to the characteristic im pedance of triaxial cable 46. Transmitter l8 and coils 32 and 36 are individually enclosed in electrostatic shields as shown in FIG. 2. Grounded conducting rings are provided at one or both ends of the electrostatic shields in a position located away from the coils and thus do not represent a shorted turn. A magnetic shield 48 is disposed around the section of triaxial transmission line 46 which comes closest to the transmitter 18 to prevent the induction of interference within triaxial the tube between the slots electrically isolated from other sections. This construction induces eddy currents within the aluminum sections to cancel coupling of any magnetic field with the sheaths of the triaxial cable 46.
Triaxial transmission line 46 is coupled to receiver amplifier 50 which is of conventional construction. The outside sheath of the triaxial transmission line 46 is grounded only at amplifier 50. The output of receiver amplifier 50 is coupled to an indicating means 52 which may be either phase responsive and/or amplitude responsive depending upon the construction of the roadand crystal oscillator 12. An integration circuit is in- 1 eluded within the phase comparator to store the level of the signal produced by the comparator. The output is applied to indicating means 52 to signal the presence of the integration circuit is applied to level sensor 56 V which comprises a threshold detector. Threshold de tector 56 produces an output signal of a first level when the amplitude of the charge stored in the integration circuit is below the threshold of the threshold detector and produces an output voltage of a second value when the level-of the charge stored in the integration circuit.
is above the threshold of threshold detector 56. The output of threshold detector56 is applied to a relay driver 28 which may be used to control the activation of a suitable signaling means to signal the presence of a vehicle within the intersection. On the other hand if an amplitude responsive circuit .is used, the output of receiver amplifier 50 is coupled to a rectification cir cuit also designated by number 54. Rectification circuit '54 is not responsive to an input derived from crystal os-' cillator 12. The resulting DC signal produced by rectifi- Threshold detector 56 and relay driver 58 are. of the same construction as discussed in the description of the phase responsive circuit. The sections of triaxial cable of a vehicle via triaxial transmission line 46. The indicating means is either amplitude responsive and/or phase responsiveas explained above.
FIG. 3shows some of thepossible coil orientations which may be used with the transmitter and receiver coils of the instant invention. The same numerals which were used in FIG. 2 to identify the transformer and receiver coils have been used in FlG. 3. It should be noted that different coil orientations may be used with different applications of the instant invention. The
choice of the particularcoil orientation must be empirically determined from the desired field of use. FIG: 3e shows that multiple receiver coils may be used with the instant invention. It should also be noted that multiple transmitting coils could be used with equal facility. In
addition, the functions of the transmitter and receiving 16 and 46 are respectively coupled to transmitter 18"" and series connected receiver coils 32 and 36 via transj formers (not shown). The longest section of conductor 7 connecting receiver coils 32 and 36 has been coh- .nected to receiver coil 32 because of the small distributed capacitance of receiver coil 36. This construction produces cancellation of the voltages induced therein when a vehicle is not magnetically coupled therewith.
The receivers 30 and 34 are DC coupledto the signal 7 indicating means 52 to provide the capability of detecting stopped vehicles. The use of sections 16 and 46 of triaxial transmission line is necessary in those environments where shielding is requiredito prevent the inducement of noise in the output signal from the receiv ers 30 and 34. When the invention is used for traffic control, placement inpavement inherently subjectsthe output signal to the inducement of noise in response to change flow within the pavement, vehicle ignition noise, etc. If the invention was located above ground for metal detection, sections of transmission linev 16 and 46 are unnecessary.
OPERATION The 100 KHz signal produced by oscillator 12 is amplified by power amplifier l4, and transmitted to transmitter 18 via triaxial transmission line 16. Because receivers 30 and 34 have their coils 32 and 36 connected coilsflare reciprocal in that the receiving coils could be used to transmit or to receive depending upon the desired mode field of operation.
FIG. 4 is a graphicalanalysis of induced receiver coil voltage versus infinite plane height. The spacings between the transmitter and receiving coils are the relevant electrical parameter values are given in the top and right hand portions of the graph. Although it is not shown-in the graph, vehicle heights above 4 /2 feet will produce an inverted mirror image in the voltage response. Given the physical heights of the various types of vehicles present in traffic today, the invention is designed to utilize only the positive half of the receiver response characteristic. 7
FIG. 5 is the magnetic gradient vehicle detector amusing a transducer optimized for amplitude detection in series and wound in magneticphase opposition to each other, the electromagnetic field, radiating from mode. Curve 62 represents amplitude response of the invention to the passage of a Volkswagon'sedan. it has been found that the phase signature is superior for vehicle detection where structural steel is not prevalent in the road bed. The amplitude signature has been found to be superior for vehicle detection where there is a large amount of structural steel in the road bed. Accordingly, the choise of using either the amplitude responsive-and/or phase responsive indicating means 52 must be determined from the construction of the road bed in which the invention is buried. It also should be understood thatthe transducer coil geometry can be changed to optimize the phase detection mode when the transducer is installed near structural steel.
FIG. 6 is agraph of the vehicle phase signature of the magnetic gradient? vehicle detector optimized for the amplitude detection mode versus the inductive loop detector. Comparison of the curve'of the respective systemsj'shows that the instant invention has a much more uniformly shaped phase response curve as a function of lateral displacement of vehicle position than the response of the inductive loop detector. The slope of the phase signature of the instant invention as a function of vehicle lateral position is approximately equal to a constant whereas the slope of the inductive loop detector is not equal to a. constant. The range of phase response of the'instant invention is much greater than the corre- 1 sponding phase response of the inductive loop detector. Unlike the variable slope of the inductive loop detector, the constant slope characteristic of the vehicle phase signature of the instant invention may be used to determine the speed of avehicle independent of its lateral displacement with respect to its position.
It should be apparent from the foregoing description that the instant invention has many advantages not present in the priorart vehicle detection systems. Ac- I cordingly, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that many modifications and changes may be made to the instant invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The many advantages and cost saving of a passive vehicleidentification and/or classification method can also be appreciated where the signature of the vehicle is measured using the invention, stored and features thereof compared toreal time measured signature information. It is to be understood that although the invention has been described with specific reference to a preferred field of use, it is not to be solimited since changes in alterations therein may be made which are within the full scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
I claim: I
1. In an object detection system of the type which senses metallic structure of objects, the combination comprising: I
an alternating current generator comprising oscillator meanshaving a predetermined oscillation frequency and constant current amplifier means;
a non-distributed element transmitter radiating electromagnetic energy at the predetermined frequency, said transmitter being electrically coupled to said alternating current generator;
receiving means being electromagnetically coupled to said transmitter, said receiving means producing a substantially zero magnitude output signal when a metallic object is not magnetically coupled with said receiving means and said transmitter and producing a non-zero level output signal in response to 2. In an object detection system asrecited in claim 1 wherein said receiving means comprisesat least one pair of series connected receiving coilswound in magnetic phase opposition toeach other to produce a zero.
magnitude output signal when a metallic object is not magnetically coupled with said transmitter and said coils and producing a non zero level output signal when eddy currents induced in the object are magnetically coupled with said. transmitter-and said coils.
3.,In an object detection system as recited in claim 2 further comprisingj a triaxial transmission line electrically coupling said transmitter and said alternating generator;
a triaxial transmission line electrically coupling said receiving means with 'saidindicatingmeans and;
separate electrostatic shielding means enclosing said transmitter and said receiving means.
4. In an object'detection system as recited in claim 3 further comprising: I
a longitudinally slotted magnetic shield disposed around the section of said triaitial transmission line coupled between said receiving means and said indication means which is located closest to said transmitterto minimize the induction of interference in said triaxial transmission line.
5. In an objection detection system as recited in claim 2 wherein each coil of said at least one pair of receiving coils has its axis substantially parallel to the other coils within said at least one pair of receiving coils.
6. In an object detection system as recited in claim 2 first input of said phase detector being coupled to said receiving means, said second input being coupled to an output of said alternating current generatOr; a threshold detection circuit having an input and an output, the input being coupled to the output of said'phase detector, said threshold circuit producing an output signal of a first level when the level of the signal of said phase detector is below the threshold of said detection circuit and producing an output signal of a second level when the level of the signal of said phase detector is above the threshold of said detection circuit; and a relay having an input and an output, said input being coupled to the output of said threshold detector, the output of said relay driver being adapted to be connected to a signalling device. 7. In an object detection system as recited in claim 2 wherein said indicating means comprises:
a threshold detection circuit having an input and an output, said input being coupled to the output of said receiving means, said threshold circuit producing an output signal of a first level when the level of the output signal produced by said receiving means is below the threshold of said detection circuit and producing an output signal of a second level when the level of the output signal produced by said receiving means is above the threshold of said detection circuit; and a relay having an input and an output, said input being coupled to the output of said threshold detector, the output of said relay driver being adapted to be connected to a signalling device. 8. An object detection device as recited in claim 4 wherein said object detection device is buried in the pavement of a roadway, said object detection device having a longitudinal axis oriented transverse to the direction of traffic flow of the roadway.
9. In an object detection device as recited in claim 2 wherein each of said at least one pair of series connected receiving coils has a distributed capacitance, said coil of said at least one pair of coils which is disposed closest to said transmitter comprising an RF choke, said coil disposed farthest from said transmitter having a ferrite core, said series connection of receiving coils having a pair of terminals with said terminals located closest to said receiving coil disposed farthest from said transmitter, and said transmitter comprising a coil and an associated ferrite core.
10. In an object detection system as recited in claim 3 further comprising:
impedance matching means coupled betweensaid transmitter and output terminals of said triaxial cable at said transmitter; and
impedance matching means coupled between output terminals of said receiving means and terminals of said triaxial transmission line at said receiving means.
11. An object detection system as recited in claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic energy is radiated from said transmitter in a dipole like spatial field pattern.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2064882 *||May 21, 1931||Dec 22, 1936||Brainerd Henry B||Traffic signal control|
|US2751150 *||Jun 6, 1952||Jun 19, 1956||Velio S Buccicone||Magnetic switching apparatus|
|US3436649 *||Jun 23, 1965||Apr 1, 1969||Omron Tateisi Electronics Co||Electrical sensing apparatus for sensing the presence of a conductive or magnetic object with compensation for supply voltage fluctuations|
|US3500310 *||Mar 29, 1966||Mar 10, 1970||Rca Corp||True presence vehicle detector including means to distinguish between slow ambient changes and changes due to the presence of a vehicle|
|US3571789 *||Nov 21, 1968||Mar 23, 1971||Lfe Corp||Vehicle presence loop detector|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4063230 *||Jun 12, 1975||Dec 13, 1977||The Magnavox Company||Balanced field theft detection system|
|US4232285 *||Nov 18, 1977||Nov 4, 1980||Thomson-Csf||Electromagnetic detector responsive to a modification of a magnetic field|
|US4276539 *||Jun 22, 1978||Jun 30, 1981||U.S. Philips Corporation||Vehicle detection systems|
|US4296401 *||Jan 10, 1978||Oct 20, 1981||Redland Automation Limited||Inductive vehicle detector|
|US4379280 *||Oct 20, 1978||Apr 5, 1983||U.S. Philips Corporation||Vehicle detection systems|
|US4472706 *||Nov 30, 1981||Sep 18, 1984||Hodge Patrick M||Vehicle presence loop detector|
|US4800978 *||Nov 8, 1985||Jan 31, 1989||Nec Corporation||Magnetic object detecting system for automated guided vehicle system|
|US4920340 *||Apr 21, 1986||Apr 24, 1990||Omron Tateisi Electronics Co.||Vehicle detecting method and system which can communicate with vehicles|
|US4968979 *||Mar 9, 1989||Nov 6, 1990||Omron Tateisi Electronics Co.||Vehicle detecting system|
|US5153525 *||Jun 17, 1991||Oct 6, 1992||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Vehicle detector with series resonant oscillator drive|
|US7504946 *||Dec 7, 2005||Mar 17, 2009||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Magnetic material sensing device, magnetic material sensing method, and image forming apparatus|
|US8311485 *||Jan 13, 2010||Nov 13, 2012||Sensormatic Electronics, LLC||Method and system for receiver nulling using coherent transmit signals|
|US20060187036 *||Dec 7, 2005||Aug 24, 2006||Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.||Magnetic material sensing device, magnetic material sensing method, and image forming apparatus|
|US20080117081 *||Mar 12, 2007||May 22, 2008||Peter Jerome Radusewicz||Portable traffic analyzer|
|US20110171910 *||Jan 13, 2010||Jul 14, 2011||Sensormatic Electronics, LLC||Method and system for receiver nulling using coherent transmit signals|
|US20140070775 *||Sep 10, 2013||Mar 13, 2014||Vibrosystm Inc.||Method for the detection of shorted turns on salient poles of rotors of electric rotating machines|
|EP0199329A2 *||Apr 21, 1986||Oct 29, 1986||Omron Tateisi Electronics Co.||Vehicle detecting system|
|EP0199329A3 *||Apr 21, 1986||Apr 5, 1989||Omron Tateisi Electronics Co.||Vehicle detecting system|
|WO2000012975A1 *||Aug 26, 1999||Mar 9, 2000||Idaho Transportation Department||Device for detecting and identifying vehicles|
|WO2002082034A2 *||Mar 13, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.||Method and device for detecting the location of faults in insulated conduit systems|
|WO2002082034A3 *||Mar 13, 2002||Nov 27, 2003||Fraunhofer Ges Forschung||Method and device for detecting the location of faults in insulated conduit systems|
|U.S. Classification||340/941, 340/551|
|International Classification||G06K9/32, G08G1/042|
|Cooperative Classification||G06K9/3241, G08G1/042|
|European Classification||G08G1/042, G06K9/32R1|