Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3913675 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 21, 1975
Filing dateOct 21, 1974
Priority dateOct 21, 1974
Publication numberUS 3913675 A, US 3913675A, US-A-3913675, US3913675 A, US3913675A
InventorsSmyrl Kenneth E
Original AssigneeDresser Ind
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Methods and apparatus for sand control in underground boreholes
US 3913675 A
Methods and apparatus for retarding the migration of formation sand and fines into the production area of an oil well borehole include utilizing a spherical aggregate of high uniform sphericity and placing the aggregate in the borehole and pushing a production liner into place in the aggregate. Other methods and apparatus disclosed utilize one-trip placement of the aggregate, and, tool systems to allow placement of the aggregate in closely premeasured distinct stages.
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Smyrl Oct. 21, 1975 [5 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SAND 3,710,862 1/1973 Young et al. 166/278 CONTROL IN UNDERGROUND gg g ney eta BOREHOLES 1 3,818,987 6/1974 Ellis [75] Inventor: Kenneth E. Smyrl, Marrero, La. 3,830,294 8/1974 S I 3,850.246 11 1974 Despujols 166/278 [73] Ass1gnee: Dresser Industries, Inc., Dallas, Tex.

[22] Filed: Oct. 21, 1974 Primary ExaminerStephen J. Novosad [21] Appl No.: 516,250 Attorney, Agent, or FirmMichael J. Caddell 52 us. (:1 166/278; 166/51; 166/305 R; [57] ABSTRACT l66/ Methods and apparatus for retarding the migration of [51] 1D!- CLI EZlB 43/04 formation 3nd and fines into the production area of Fleld of Search 305 an oil well borehole include utilizing a spherical aggrel66/l20, 224 134, 307 gate of high uniform sphericity and placing the aggregate in the borehole and pushing a production liner References Cited into place in the aggregate. Other methods and appa- UNITED STATES PATENTS ratus disclosed utilize one-trip placement of the aggre- 3,126,963 3/1964 Graham 166/51 gate Systems to allow Pldcement of the 3,329,205 7/1967 Brown 166/278 gregate in Closely Premeasured distinct Stages 3,548,936 12/1970 Kilgore et al..... 166/216 3,627,046 12/1971 Miller et al. 166/278 9 20 Drawmg Fleur ll i /l l ll U.S. Patent' Oct.21, 1975 Sheet 1 of8 3,913,675

FIG. 3

FIG. 2


US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet3of8 3,913,675

y; y? f r m o a FIG.

FIG. 8

FIG. 7

US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 cLosEo VALVE;

Sheet 4 of 8 VALVE U.S. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet 5 0M 3,913,675


FIG. :4


US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet6of8 3,913,675

GRAVEL SPHERICITY ROUNDNESS 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.? 0.9

PERCENT OF 5() SAMPLE 40 4 40 4 FIG. l5


62.5 PERCENT 6O 5 OF 50 SAMPLE FIG. l6

US. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet 7 of8 3,913,675


U.S. Patent Oct. 21, 1975 Sheet 8 of8 3,913,675

in P, M .I N S V/ w wm w o w u/ J I. l m 3 x 5 Y T ll.

' FIG. 20


FIG. l8

METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR SAND CONTROL IN UNDERGROUND BOREHOLES BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In underground formations penetrated by drille boreholes wherein the formations contain loose sands and soft sandstone strata, a constant problem in well flow through the borehole involves the migration of the loose sands and degraded sandstone into the wellbore due to destruction of the formation caused by the pressure and flow of the fluids therethrough.

While numerous techniques have been used to prevent this migration of fine particles which clog the production system and seriously erode the tools in the string, two basic techniques have evolved. The first is basically a chemical treatment involving injection of a fluid into the formation and reacting the fluid chemically or with heat to set up a permeable gel or solid to retain the sand while allowing fluid flow therethrough. This method suffers from a lack of homogeneity caused by voids in the gel due to incomplete saturation of the initial fluid and the setting fluid.

The second technique involves a physical technique of placing a graded aggregate in the borehole to form a porous screen between the production string and the formation wall. This technique is commonly referred to as gravel packing and generally involves the placement of finely graded aggregate such as ottawa sand, walnut shells, glass beads, etc., through a crossover tool or by a washing-in tool.

These tools suffer from the disadvantages of complexity, contamination of pumps, and moving parts with the aggregate, and a lengthy multi-step process of gravel placement. For instance, when the liner is washed into place, at least two runs of the tool spring into the wellbore are required.

Also the prior devices result in a great infusion of circulating fluid into the formation to place the aggregate. This is undesirable in that it interferes with the normal flow of formation fluids to the wellbore.

The present invention overcomes these disadvantages by providing apparatus and methods for placing the aggregate in a single step and for placing the aggregate with a minimum of fluid loss to the formation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIGS. 1 through 6 are cross-sectional, partially schematic illustrations of a tool string and operational steps for a one-trip placement;

FIGS. 7 through 9 illustrate in cross-section apparatus and operational steps for an alternate embodiment of aggregate placement;

FIGS. 10 through 14 illustrate in cross-section a tool string and its operational modes for formation treatment and aggregate placement;

FIGS. 15 and 16 are bar graphs showing a comparison of aggregates;

FIG. 17 is a pictorial chart for determination of the physical parameters of different aggregates;

FIGS. 18 through 20 illustrate in cross-section a tool system and steps of operation for placement of spherical aggregates.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Referring to FIGS. 1-6, a tool string and its steps of d 5 operation are illustrated for a one-trip aggregate placement.

In FIG. 1, a tool string 10 is lowered into a cased borehole 11 in an underground unconsolidated formation until the placement tools in the string are located in the producing zone 12.

The casing 11 contains multiple perforations 13 through the wall thereof allowing communication with formation zone 12.

The tool string 10 comprises a string of conduit (not shown) reaching to the surface and having a packer mandrel 15 slidably attached thereto. Packer mandrel 15 has a packer assembly comprising a tubular gripping member 16, flanged abutment sleeve 18, and resilient packer elements 17 located slidably thereon. Attached to the lower end of mandrel 15 is an inner valve sleeve 19 which shearably carries a valve seating ring 20. Sleeve 19 has a plurality of peripherally aligned flow ports 21 through the wall thereof.

An outer valve housing assembly 22 is attached to the lower end of flanged sleeve 18 and comprises a tubular adapter 23, external valve sleeve 24, lower valve ring carrier housing 25, and valve seating ring 26. Valve sleeve 24 has a plurality of peripherally aligned ports 27 through the wall thereof arranged to substantially align with ports 21. Valve ring 26 is shearably held in the narrowed lower end 28 of carrier housing 25. A screen adapter 29 is attached to section 28 and carries below it a sand screen 30 which is closed at the lower end by cap 31.

A captive valve element 32 is located in chamber 33 of housing 25 and may consist of a spherical ball or other element capable of seating in valve ring 26. Resilient seals 34 on mandrel 15 and resilient seals 35 on valve sleeve 19 provide slidable fluid tight sealing between the inner elements 15 and 19 and outer assembly 22.

FIG. 1 illustrates the tool spring as it appears while running in the casing and after it has been positioned therein. The packer 16 and 17 is unset and valve ports 21 and 27 are aligned to allow flow into the string while running in which reduces buoyancy of the casing. Flow is indicated by arrows in thefigures.

In FIG. 2, the packer is shown in the set position with unitary slip 16 rotated into engagement with the casing and resilient elements 17 compressed axially and expanded radially to seal against the inner bore of the casing 11. The setting of the packer as thus illustrated may be achieved by several methods such as mechanical, wireline, or hydraulic. The preferable method as described herein where mandrel 15 is slidably mounted on a conduit string is by hydraulic actuation. A valve member 36 is dropped or pumped down the tubing string to land and seal in seating ring 20. Subsequent application of fluidic pressure to the tubing is communicated through communication means in mandrel 15 such as ports (not shown) in a manner known in the art and as described for instance in US. Pat. Nos. 3,73l,740; 3,735,814; 3,818,987 and 3,548,936. The fluid pressure serves to move flanged sleeve 18 upward, pivoting the tubular slip 16 into casing engagement, and thereafter compressing packer elements 17 into radial expansion against the casing.

After the packer has set, the injection rate is established by continued pressurization of the tubing string to the point where the shear means holding seat 20 in sleeve 19 is sheared and the valve member 36 and seat 20 move downward to land on member 32 as illustrated in FIG. 3. It should be noted that the shear value of the shear means holding ring 20 in sleeve 19 is selected to be higher than that pressure needed to fully set the packer slip 16 and elements 17.

After shearing ring 20 with pressure on valve member 36, fluid can then be injected down the tubing, through the two sets of multiple ports 21 and 27, and into the formation to provide any desirable type of treatment such as acidizing in any desired quantity.

When the formation treatment has been completed, and it is desirable to effect a placement of aggregate to prevent backflow of formation sand and fines into the production string, a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and a graded, substantially spherical aggregate is pumped through the tubing behind the injection fluid to flow through ports 21 and 27 as indicated by the flow arrows in FIG. 4. The fluid flows outward through perforations 13 in the casing, which perforations retain the aggregate as indicated in FIG. 4. It should also be noted that screen 30 is selected with mesh openings small enough to prevent passage of the graded aggregate therethrough.

FIG. 5 illustrates the apparatus after the entire aggregate pack has been pumped into position and the string is ready for production. In FIG. 5 the inner sleeve 19 has been moved downward with mandrel by manipulation of the tubing or other means such as tubing rotation or wireline. Upper seals 35 now seal off communication from ports 21 to ports 27.

FIG. 6 indicates the final step to place the string on production which involves once again applying hydraulic pressure to the tubing in an amount sufficient to shear valve ring 26 loose and move it downward to the bottom of the screen 30. Screen 30 is chosen long enough so that the presence of the two valve members and valve rings do not significantly interfere with production flow.

Production fluids now may enter perforations l3, flow through the aggregate pack and through screen 30 into the tubing string.

The advantages of the above invention are obvious. A viscous-slurry, sand-control tool string has been described which allows the treatment to be performed with only one-trip of the string into the hole. A great reduction in time and rig expense is realized. The savings in time and expense are not achieved by sacrificing simplicity and dependability. A complicated crossover type tool with high flowrestriction and close machine tolerances is obviated.

Alternate Embodiment FIGS. 7 through 9 illustrate apparatus and a method for placing an aggregate pack in a wellbore between a production screen and the well casing or borehole wall.

In FIG. 7 a tubing string 110 carrying a packer 111 is lowered into the cased wellbore, which casing has perforations therethrough at 112 to allow communication with the formation. The packer is set in the casing by conventional means and the aggregate slurry is placed in the desired interval by normal squeeze techniques. A small amount of the aggregate carrier fluid is passed into the formation as the slurry is injected.

After the entire aggregate pack is placed in the interval, the packer is released and the injection string is pulled from the well. The production string 113 carrying a production packer 114 and a control screen 115 is then lowered into the well as shown in FIG. 8.

Weight is then set down on the production string and the control screen is pushed into the aggregate slurry to form the aggregate pack around the screen, as shown in FIG. 9. Well fluids are then produced through the casing perfs 112, the aggregate, and the control screen 1 15.

This method offers many clear advantages including maintaining the integrity of the production string from the aggregate material. Many times a material such as inert vitreous spheres may be utilized as the aggregate which spheres are very strong compared to the normal gravel pack. When these are formed in a control pack by the use of a crossover tool or by washing in the screen, these tough particles get into the working mechanisms of the tools and of the oil-well pumps. Whereas normal gravel is merely crushed in the mechanisms, the hard vitreous spheres are not and cause extreme wear and peening damage to the parts they come in contact with. The advantage of this system is that the aggregate is never allowed access to the inner bore of the production string since the tubing and control screen remain joined and intact at all times and impervious to aggregate penetration therethrough.

Other advantages involve the minimal amount of equipment used to complete the job. No washing of the screen into place nor complex crossover tools are required. Much of the pack can be placed with a dump bailer thereby reducing fluid loss to the formation. Since no large amounts of fluids are circulated through the sand control screen during placement, screen plugging problems during the treatment are reduced.

It also should be noted that the elimination of complex equipment involved with building an aggregate pack outside the screen allows the placement of a prepacked screen inside of the aggregate pack. This use of a pre-packed screen will result in a wellbore configuration which is much more efficient and of greater durability than the prior methods. A pre-packed screen is one which has a bonded layer or multiple bonded layer of aggregate outside the screen, bonded thereto by a permeable binder to provide a sand barrier outside the screen. The pre-packed screen is formed prior to lowering the tubing string into the well.

Formation support is achieved by the pack as it is placed. The running of the screen into the pack is done with this formation support which minimizes the danger of having the very expensive string getting stuck in the hole during installation.

Use of fewer tools and steps means decreased rig time and reduced expense as well as greater simplicity of operation.

The placement of the pack in the unobstructed bore passage prior to placement of the screen greatly re duces the likelihood of voids in the pack. If any voids are present in the pack as it is placed, these would tend to be filled with packing material as the screen is inserted into the pack. The high uniformity achieved in the pack with this method provides the best possible filter.

In addition to the above method steps, an additional advantage can be realized with the process above by making the carrier vehicle a thixotropic gel or highly viscous fluid in which the aggregates are substantially suspended. This results in greatly reducing the force required to push the screen into the aggregate. It also reduces even further the amount of fluid lost to the formation.

- Also with this method, exceptionally long intervals can be packed by successive squeeze injections done with multiple batches of aggregates.

Third Embodiment FIGS. through 14 illustrate a third embodimnet of the sand control process in which a viscous slurry aggregate placement tool string and its modes of operation are disclosed.

In figure 10 a tubing string 210 carrying a sliding port valve sleeve 211 contains in slidable telescoped attachment an inner ported valve sleeve 212 having ports 214 alignable with ports 213 of sleeve 211. Sleeve 212 has attached thereto a packer mandrel 215 upon which is carried an hydraulically actuated, permanent type packer 216 of the type delineated in the aforementioned US. Patents on packers.

A tailpipe 217 is attached to the packer 216 and carries at its lower end, ported collar 218 having ports 219 through the wall thereof. Collar 218 also has a sealbore 220 which is a reduced machined diameter adapted to receive a tubular conduit therein having circumferential seals on it.

Mandrel 215 passes through packer 216 and carries at its lower end a ported seal sleeve 221 engaged in sealbore 220 in sealing telescopic relationship. Sleeve 221 has ports 222 through the wall thereof aligned with ports 219 of collar 218. Sleeve 221 also has an upper valve seating ring 223 shearably attached therein above ports 222 and a lower valve seating ring 224 attached therein below ports 222. A valve member 225 is preferably seated in lower seat 224 when the tool is assembled at the surface.

A section of adapter conduit 227 is attached to the lower end of a tubular adapter 226 connected to collar 218. A sand control screen 228 is attached to the conduit 227 and has a bottom cap 229 thereon. It should be noted that all of the figures are drawn partially in schematic and the actual lengths of the conduits and sand control screens as well as the aggregate packs may be substantially-longer with respect to the other tools than is graphically illustrated.

FIG. 10 illustrates the tool string substantially as it is run in the well. After placement of the string, a second valve member 230 is dropped or pumped down the tubing to seat on seating ring 223 which isolates ports 219 and 222 from the tubing bore. Fluidic pressure is then applied to the tubing, setting the hydraulic packer.

After the packer is set into the casing, hydraulic pressure is increased until the seating ring 223 is sheared out of sleeve 221 allowing the ring and valve member 230 to drop down, exposing ports 219 and 222 to the tubing bore passage. At this point, any required formation treatment, such as acidizing, can be accomplished as illustrated in FIG. 11, by pumping down the tubing and out ports 222 and 219 into the annulus and through casing perforations 231 into the formation.

After the injection of treating fluid, valve 211 is opened by manipulating the tubing string vertically to align ports 213 and 214. The treatment fluid can be displaced from the tubing and up the annulus by injecting a slurry of aggregate and viscous carrier fluid down the tubing. Because of the treatment fluid in the formation and the consequent high resistance to the introduction of further fluid into the formation, pumping of aggregate slurry down the tubing will displace the treatment fluid out of the tubing through ports 213 and 214 to pass up the annulus to the surface. The is clearly illustrated in FIG. 12.

After the first batch of aggregate has reached valve 211, the valve is closed by tubing reciprocation and the aggregate slurry is squeezed through the packer out ports 222 and 219 and around the sand control screen 228, as shown in FIG. 13. A portion of the carrier fluid moves under squeeze pressure out into the formation. After this batch of aggregate has been placed, additional batches cna be squeezed with a minimum amount of fluid injection into the formation by repeating the steps of FIGS. 12 and 13 for each batch of aggregate.

After the total amount of aggregate has been placed, the tubing string and mandrel are pulled from inside the packer and a production string 232 is run in the packer with a seal nipple 233 located at the lower end. This nipple has seals 234 thereon which engage seal bore 220 in sealing relationship and provide a closed production flow passage from the aggregate pack through the production string. This apparatus is illustrated in FIG. 14.

The advantages of this embodiment are manifold. The packer used throughout the entire process is the same one and remains in the well during production also. This eliminates multiple setting and unsetting of packers and the possibility of a stuck packer. The packer is set hydraulically so that no tubing rotation is necessary and also the packer is selectively retrievable at any time during the operations without requiring a separate trip with the tubing string. This is accomplished by running a retrieving tool as a part of the tubing string below the packer which can be selectively actuated to retrieve the packer at any time desired.

The valve utilized above the packer is actuated by reciprocation of the tubing string and requires no tubing rotation. The use of the valve above the packer to allow the circulation of batches of slurry into the well, not only prevents the loss of large quantities of fluids to the formation during the squeezing operation but also allows building the aggregate pack in stages. This means that one stage after another can be placed until the desired pressure increase across the pack is obtained indicating an optimum pack.

This further prevents the need for a large over-design of a single or dual stage which requires a long hookup between the packer and the sand control screen. This tool allows the sand control screen to be placed at less than feet from the packer whereas the prior single or dual stage operations have required up to 1200 feet. Thus, when two or more zones in the same well are to be packed, this invention is especially desirable.

A further advantage of this invention is that all extraneous parts are removed from the well before production, i.e. seating rings, valve members, etc.

Fourth Embodiment FIGS. 15 through 20 illustrate a method of forming an aggregate pack which is particularly advantageous for use in wells which are treated by fluids which return through the aggreagte pack and screen and into the tubing.

Because of the nature of the aggregates formerly used in this type of well treatment, which aggregates contain particles having a low degree of roundness, large amounts of fines are created druing the pumping operation because of the shear forces placed on the angular particles under the high fluidic flow forces. These fines, which should be distinguished from formation fines and sand, are generated entirely within the aggregate pack itself by the high shear forces and the abrasion of the aggregate particles against each other, and cause the extremely undesirable effect of substantially plugging the sand control screen.

This invention utilizes a manufactured aggregate of uniformly high spericity and roundness to almost totally eliminate the plugging of the sand screen by internally generated aggregate fines.

FIG. illustrates sphericity and roundness of a graded sample of standard -40 mesh round gravel used in normal gravel packing operations. The chart was obtained by taking a random sample of the gravel and visually comparing each individaul particle against the chart illustrated in FIG. 17 to arrive at the sphericity and roundness of each particle in the sample. A sample size of 255 gravels was used to determine the grading average for gravel.

As can be seen from FIG. 15, the number of gravel particles that achieved a high spericity and roundness of 0.9 or better was only a little over 6 percent. Only about 27 percent achieved a sphericity and roundness of 0.7. Thus, the number of gravel particles having a sphericity and roundness of 0.7 or better was found to be only 33 percent.

FIG. 16 illustrates the sphericity and roundness of a manufactured aggregate used in this invention to greatly eliminate fines in the pack. The sample selected was a 240 particle random sample of 20-40 mesh smooth vitreous spheres manufactured by the Union Carbide Corporation under the tradename UCAR Pac.

This material is utilized because of the high percentage of particles having a sphericity and roundness exceeding 0.9. The measured sample had more than 56 percent of its particles having 0.9 or better roundness an sphericity as compared to only six percent of the gravel. Approximately 70 percent of the manufactured aggregate equaled or exceeded 0.7 as compared to only 33 percent of the gravel.

A highly effective method of placing the vitreous spheres into an aggregate pack is disclosed in FIGS. 18 through 20. i

In FIG. 18, a sand control screen 310 is lowered into a cased wellbore 311 having perforations 312 communicating with the producing formation 313. The screen 310 is releasably attached, for instance by threads or telescoping J-slot arrangement, to a conduit string 314 which also carries a wash pipe 315 extending downwardly therefrom into concentric alignment inside screen 310.

The aggregate slurry is pumped down the annulus between the conduit 314 and the casing 311 into the interval of the well needing the aggregate pack. The car- It is during this placement stage, when the aggregate pack is formed by pumping aggregate-laden fluid down the casing-conduit annulus and taking fluid returns through the screen, that the aggregate particles are subjected to the greatest shear forces and the maximum amount of fines would otherwise be collected at the screen.

After the pack is completed, the conduit string is released from the control screen and removed from the well along with the wash pipe. This results in a configuration as shown in FIG. 19. A production string 316 is then run with a packer 317 and sealingly connected to the sand control screen. The packer is then set and the well placed on production.

It is believed that the large asbsence in fines using this process may be due in part to the particles lack of angular comers or protrusions which tend to shear off from the particle and form fines. To avoid the shear effect, the fines must have both a high degree of sphericity and a high degree of roundness. In mature, a grain of sand approaches a spherical shape as it is moved by wind or water from one location to another due to the shearing and wearing off of the angularities. This process occurs over a long period of time and results in a particle which hardly ever loses all of its angularity. Also the sand grain will have imperfections, voids, impurities and weakened shear planes running throughout its structure.

During the gravel placement, the sand grains (which are called gravel) are subjected to high shear forces from the large pressure differential across the packed sand and abrasion caused by the high pressure flow of placement fluid through the pack. This especially becomes a problem in treatments where returns are taken through the screen because large volumes of fluid are moved through the packed grains and the screen under large differential pressures. Enough fines can be created by this type of treatment with conventional gravel to plug the sand control screen before production is even initiated in the well.

The forces applied to the spherical particles are almost totally compressive as opposed to the shear forces on the gravel particles. The abrasion of angular particle against angular particle is eliminated with the spherical aggregate. The spherical shape contributes also the high compressive strength and the particles themselves are manufactured without the large imperfections and weak shear planes of the sand grains.

A close observation of the chart of FIG. 17 will show that neither roundness nor sphericity alone will sufficiently define the optimum particle shape but the best aggregate for sand control must exhibit both high sphericity and high roundness.

For example a particle could have a roundness of 0.9 v

and a sphericity of only 0.3 and have a smooth rounded surface. Yet the particle would be elongated and have a small cross-sectional diameter which would be subject to high stress under flow conditions in an aggregate pack.

Generally, the two parameters of sphericity and roundness are interrelated but not equivalent. Sphericity is determined by the largest diagonal diameter and the particle volume, while roundness depends upon the general cross-sectional profile and smoothness of surface. Sphericity is the cube root of the ratio of the actual volume of the particle to the volume of a sphere having as its diameter, the diameter of the actual particle at its largest point. The formula for sphericity used in the sample determination is given as:

. VP Spheric ity F where Vp particles actual volume; and VC volume of the sphere circumscribing the particle at its greatest diameter.

Roundness is defined as the average radius of corners and edges of the particle divided by the radius of the maximum inscribed circle for the particle. Roundness is measured using the maximum cross-sectional area obtainable with the particle.

Although a specific preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described in the detailed description above, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms or embodiments disclosed herein, since they are to be recognized as illustrative rather than restrictive and it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention is not so limited. For instance, where -40 mesh spherical vitreous particles have been described as the aggregate used to form the pack, it is clear that other size particles could be utilized as well as multiple sizes of particles. Also other spherical particles may be used such as metallic spheres. Thus the invention is declared to cover all changes and modifications of the specific example of the invention herein disclosed, for purposes of illustration, which do not constitute departures from the spirit and scope of the invention.

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:

1. Apparatus for placing an aggregate pack in a wellbore about a sandscreen, said apparatus comprising:

elongated tubular packer mandrel means adapted for attachment to standard well conduit;

packer means removably secured to said mandrel means, adapted for expansion into sealing contact with a borehole wall;

elongated tubular lower housing means attached to said packer means;

said housing means adapted to receive a sand control screen in attachment thereto; first ported valve means above said packer means adapted to selectively communicate the bore passage of said mandrel means with the wellbore annulus;

second ported valve means below said packer means adapted to communicate said mandrel means bore passage with the wellbore annulus;

shearable valve means shearably located in said mandrel means below at least a portion of said packer means and above said second ported valve means; and,

checkvalve means below said shearable valve means;

said mandrel means arranged in sealingly slidable telescopic engagement in said housing means.

2. The aggregate placement apparatus of claim 1 wherein said first ported valve means comprises a mechanically actuated sliding sleeve valve having an inner ported sleeve and an outer ported sleeve, said sleeves having ports arranged to be radially aligned in one position of said outer sleeve on said inner sleeve, and said first ported valve means arranged to be actuated by manipulation of the well conduit.

3. The placement apparatus of claim 2 wherein said second ported valve means comprises one or more ports through the wall of said housing means and one or more ports through the wall of said mandrel means,

5 said housing means ports arranged in alignment with said mandrel means ports.

4. The aggregate placement apparatus of claim 1 wherein said shearable valve means comprises an annular valve seat held in said mandrel means by shear means and adapted to receive in sealing engagement a valve member introduced down the well conduit through said mandrel means.

5. The aggregate placement apparatus of claim 1 wherein said check valve means comprises an annular valve seat secured in said mandrel means and a valve member adapted to seat in said valve seat and seal off the opening therethrough.

6. The aggregate placement apparatus of claim 1 wherein said packer means comprises an hydraulically actuated well packer having expandable resilient packer means and fluid communication means communicating with said mandrel means above said shearable valve means.

7. A method of treating an underground formation in a wellbore, said method comprising:

lowering into the wellbore a tool string containing upper and lower valve means, packer means, and

a sand control screen; setting the packer into sealing engagement with the wellbore by providing a flow communication channel through the tool string to the packer means; providing a valve seat in the tool string below the flow channel and above the lower valve means; pumping a valve member down the tool string to seat in the valve seat; and, pressurizing the fluid above the seated valve to actuate the packer means;

injecting an aggregate slurry into the tool string,

through the lower valve means, and into the borehole around the sand control screen; and,

establishing a flow communication channel from the formation, through the sand control screen and up the tool string.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising the 45 steps of:

injecting treating fluid through the tool string and out the lower valve means below the packer means and into the formation after said setting step; and,

displacing the treating fluid remaining in the string out the upper valve means prior to said aggregate injecting step.

9. A method of placing an aggregate pack around a sandscreen in a wellbore, said method comprising:

placing in the wellbore a conduit string having a permanent hydraulic packer, a permanent tubular housing, a removable tubular mandrel inside the packer and housing, a check valve in lower end of the mandrel, valve means below the packer, and a sand control screen below the housing;

closing the bore through the mandrel below the packer;

applying hydraulic pressure to the conduit string to actuate the packer;

shearing the bore closure below the packer from the mandrel;

injecting a slurry containing a carrier fluid and an aggregate material into the conduit string and wellbore; and,

lowering a production string through the packer into sealing engagement in the housing below the valve means thereby opening a flow communication bore from the sandscreen through the production string.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3126963 *Jun 27, 1960Mar 31, 1964 Well completion tool
US3329205 *Jul 2, 1965Jul 4, 1967Brown Joe RThermal production process for oil wells and method of equipping such wells
US3548936 *Nov 15, 1968Dec 22, 1970Dresser IndWell tools and gripping members therefor
US3627046 *Nov 10, 1969Dec 14, 1971Lynes IncMethod and apparatus for positioning and gravel packing a production screen in a well bore
US3710862 *Jun 7, 1971Jan 16, 1973Otis Eng CorpMethod and apparatus for treating and preparing wells for production
US3731740 *May 24, 1971May 8, 1973Dresser IndFloating piston for selective hydraulic packer
US3818986 *Nov 1, 1971Jun 25, 1974Dresser IndSelective well treating and gravel packing apparatus
US3818987 *Nov 17, 1972Jun 25, 1974Dresser IndWell packer and retriever
US3830294 *Oct 24, 1972Aug 20, 1974Baker Oil Tools IncPulsing gravel pack tool
US3850246 *Jul 14, 1973Nov 26, 1974Gulf Research Development CoGravel packing method and apparatus
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4046198 *Feb 26, 1976Sep 6, 1977Exxon Production Research CompanyMethod and apparatus for gravel packing wells
US4124074 *Dec 9, 1976Nov 7, 1978Texaco Inc.Method for forming a gravel pack in tar sands
US4253522 *May 21, 1979Mar 3, 1981Otis Engineering CorporationGravel pack tool
US4745975 *Mar 23, 1987May 24, 1988Larry Ray PriceWater well completion apparatus and method of use
US4848459 *Apr 12, 1988Jul 18, 1989Dresser Industries, Inc.Apparatus for installing a liner within a well bore
US4856590 *Nov 28, 1986Aug 15, 1989Mike CaillierProcess for washing through filter media in a production zone with a pre-packed screen and coil tubing
US4969524 *Oct 17, 1989Nov 13, 1990Halliburton CompanyWell completion assembly
US5219025 *Apr 10, 1992Jun 15, 1993Otis Engineering CorporationMethod and apparatus for gravel packing a well through a tubing string
US5310000 *Sep 28, 1992May 10, 1994Halliburton CompanyFoil wrapped base pipe for sand control
US5335727 *Nov 4, 1992Aug 9, 1994Atlantic Richfield CompanyFluid loss control system for gravel pack assembly
US5355956 *Sep 28, 1992Oct 18, 1994Halliburton CompanyPlugged base pipe for sand control
US6176307Feb 8, 1999Jan 23, 2001Union Oil Company Of CaliforniaTubing-conveyed gravel packing tool and method
US6695057 *Feb 11, 2002Feb 24, 2004Weatherford/Lamb, Inc.Fracturing port collar for wellbore pack-off system, and method for using same
US6920930Dec 10, 2002Jul 26, 2005Allamon InterestsDrop ball catcher apparatus
US7387164 *May 16, 2005Jun 17, 2008Pringle Ronald EMethod and apparatus for selective injection or flow control with through-tubing operation capacity
US7997344Sep 11, 2007Aug 16, 2011Baker Hughes IncorporatedMulti-function indicating tool
US9133692Jan 15, 2010Sep 15, 2015Baker Hughes IncorporatedMulti-acting circulation valve
US20040108109 *Dec 10, 2002Jun 10, 2004Allamon Jerry P.Drop ball catcher apparatus
US20050189117 *May 16, 2005Sep 1, 2005Schlumberger Technology CorporationMethod & Apparatus for Selective Injection or Flow Control with Through-Tubing Operation Capacity
US20090065193 *Sep 11, 2007Mar 12, 2009Corbett Thomas GMulti-Function Indicating Tool
US20110048723 *Jan 15, 2010Mar 3, 2011Baker Hughes IncorporatedMulti-acting Circulation Valve
US20110198096 *Feb 15, 2010Aug 18, 2011Tejas Research And Engineering, LpUnlimited Downhole Fracture Zone System
CN101835955BSep 5, 2008Sep 24, 2014贝克休斯公司Multi-function indicating tool
EP0421822A2 *Oct 5, 1990Apr 10, 1991Baker-Hughes IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for single trip injection of fluid for well treatment and for gravel packing thereafter
EP1877645A1 *Apr 28, 2006Jan 16, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Annular packer device
WO2005049954A2 *Nov 12, 2004Jun 2, 2005Baker Hughes IncGravel pack crossover tool with single position multi-function capability
WO2009035923A2 *Sep 5, 2008Mar 19, 2009Baker Hughes IncMulti-function indicating tool
U.S. Classification166/278, 166/51, 166/307, 166/305.1
International ClassificationE21B43/02, E21B43/04
Cooperative ClassificationE21B43/04
European ClassificationE21B43/04