|Publication number||US3915633 A|
|Publication date||Oct 28, 1975|
|Filing date||Sep 21, 1972|
|Priority date||Sep 21, 1972|
|Publication number||US 3915633 A, US 3915633A, US-A-3915633, US3915633 A, US3915633A|
|Original Assignee||Colgate Palmolive Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (50), Classifications (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent AU 165 x Ramachandran 1 Oct. 28, 1975 1 COMPLEXING ACID PRE-WASl-l 3,003,899 10/1961 Eberhard et a1. 252/142 C MPOSI AND METHOD 3,166,444 1/1965 Ehren et a1. 252/142 3,277,008 10/1966 Heit 252/142 Inventor: Palhssana Ramachandran, 3,650,968 3/1972 Hoffman et al. 252/142 I Robinsville, NJ.  Assignee: Colgate Palmolive Company, New J: Padgett York, Assistant Examiner-Irwin Gluck Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Steven J. Baron; Norman  led: Sept- 21, 1972 Blumenkopf; Herbert S. Sylvester 21 Appl. No.: 290,789
 ABSTRACT 52 us. 61. 8/137; 252/95; 252/142; A pre-wash composition adapted to be sprayed Onto a 134 3; 34 1 soiled fabric before washing consisting essentially of 511 1111.131. 0065 1/02; B08B 3/02 from I to 20% y weight of an Organic complexing 58 Field of Search 8/137, 139; 252/142, 175, acid, from 0 to 30% y Weight of a Surface activs 252/95; 34 3 22 4 agent and from 99 to 50% by weight of water. The method for assisting the removal .of soil from a fabric 5 R fe Cited comprises spraying a soiled fabric with the above com- UNITED STATES PATENTS position followed by laundering the same in a conventional manner. 2,994,664 8/1961 Wachter 252/142 3,003,898 10/1961 Reich 252/142 18 Claims, No Drawings I I a COMPLEXING ACID PRE-WASH COMPOSITION AND METHOD This invention relates to a pre-wash composition and a method for utilizing the same. More particularly, this invention relates to a pre-wash composition utilizing as its primary active ingredient an organic acid capable of complexing the stain-forming metallic ions in the soil.
Although organic acid solutions have a wide variety of uses including the removal of white casein type adhesives as disclosed in US. Pat. No. 3,551,230, the removal of fish odors and fish residue as in US. Pat. No. 3,650,968 and in the prevention of the yellowing of freshly spun synthetic and natural fibers as in US. Pat. Nos. 3,083; 3,383,350; 2,922,728 and 3,256,100 as well as the utilizations as a dishwashing rinsing aid, such as in US. Pat. No. 3,563,901 and also as salts of these acids as various builders for synthetic detergents, these materials have not been utilized as pre-washing agents which assist the subsequent cleaning properties of a detergent in removing stain forming materials.
The problem of metal ions which are present in various soils forming irremovable metal stains on clothing has plagued housewives and laundry operators for a long time. Prior attempts to remove these stains have centered on removal, rather than prevention, with the most common method being bleaching fabrics which are heavily soiled or stained Accordingly, it is within the above enviroment that the composition and process of the present invention was developed. Briefly, the composition of the present invention which allows for the effective sequestering of metal ions through a pre-wash composition, consists essentially of from 1 to 20% by weight of an organic complexing acid, from O to 30% by weight of a surface active agent and from 99 to 50% by weight of water, the process of the present invention comprising applying an effective amount of an organic complexing acid onto a fabric before washing.
It is, therefore, the primary object of the present invention to provide a novel method for pre-treating fabrics so as to assist the detergents in a subsequent washing cycle.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a pre-wash composition which is especially well adapted for the removal of clays and other solids containing ferric and other ions which tend to stain the cloth.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a method which quickly and efficiently prevents any mineral staining and aids in the subsequent laundry removal of ground-in dirt.
Still further objects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following more detailed description thereof.
The process of the present invention comprises applying a solution comprising from l to 20% by weight of an organic complexing acid to a fabric and laundering the treated fabric.
The composition of the present invention consists essentially of from 1 to 20% by weight of an organic complexing acid, from to 30% by weight of a surface active agent and from 99 to 50% by weight of water.
The composition of the present invention as utilized in the process of the present invention is an aqueous solution comprising from 1 to 20% and, preferably, from 5 to and most preferable about 5% by weight of an cinic acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid,
adipic acid, and mixtures of these acids. Although any of the above acids may be utilized, in the process and composition of the present invention citric and tartaric acids are preferred, with citric acid being most preferred.
Although in conventional compositions and processes, the salts of these organic, complexing acids are often utilized with similar or equivalent results, the sodium salts of the above noted acids as well as the other alkaline and the alkaline earth salts of these acids are not effective in the composition and process of the present invention since these salts do not have the complexing properties necessary for the enhancement of the removal of the soil from the fabric. Accordingly, in the process and composition of the present invention, only the acids themselves and not their salts may be utilized.
Furthermore, only the organic complexing acids aid in the removal of these ions since the removal is not a function of pH as demonstrated by the inability of mineral acid solutions to effectively prevent staining from irremovable metal ions. Also, these latter acids are much too strong for continued use since they tend to degrade the fibers.
Although the solvent for the pre-wash composition utilized in the process of the present invention is normally water, the water may be mixed with up to 10% of various other materials, such as lower monohydric alcohols. However, these lower monohydric alcohols should be quite limited in their use and solutions of the complexing acids in water alone are preferred.
In addition to the water and the citric acid, the composition of the present invention may also include up to 30% of an optional non-ionic or anionic surface active agent. These surface active agents, if present, aid the complexing properties of the acids since the surfactants tend to disperse the acid through the soiled fabric. Of the various non-ionic and anionic surface active agents, those containing straight chains and those which are biodegradable are most preferred.
Representative non-ionic detergents include alkaryl polyglycol detergents such alkyl-phenol-ethylene oxide condensates (2-l00 moles ethylene oxide), e.g., p isooctyl phenol-polyethylene oxide l0 ethylene oxide units), long chain alcohol ethylene oxide condensation product (2-200 moles ethylene oxide), e.g., dodecyl alcohol-polyethylene oxides having 4 to 16 ethylene oxide units per molecule, polyglycerol monolaurate, glycol dioleate, sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monostearate, sorbitan monopalmitate, sorbitan monooleate, sorbitan sesquioleate, the condensation products of ethylene oxide with sorbitan esters of long chain fatty acids (T Weens), alkylolamides, amino oxide phosphine oxides, etc.
In addition to the above noted non-ionic detergents, anionic detergents may also be utilized in the composition and process of the present invention. Suitable anionic detergents include alkylbenzene-sulfonic acid and salts, having the formula alkyl-phenyl-SO M, wherein alkyl is an alkyl radical of a fatty acid and M is hydrogen or an alkali metal, which compounds comprise a well known class of anionic detergents. Other suitable anionic detergents are the alkali metal salts of the higher alkyl and linear paraffin sulfonic acids and the alkali metal dialkylsulfosucciantes, e.g., sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate, and sodium dihexylsulfosuccinate,
3 sodium sulfoethylphthalate, sodium allyl-p-anisidinesulfonate; sodium sodium tetradecanesulfonate; sodium diisopropylnaphthalenesulfonate; sodium octyliphenoxyethoxyethylsulfonate, etc.; and the alkali metal alkyl sulfates.
Among the above noted alkylbenzene-sulfonic acid and salts thereof, there are included those which are biodegradable and which particularly characterized by a linear alkyl substituent of from C m to C and preferably from C to C It is, of course, understood that the carbon chain length represents, in general, an average chain length since the method for producing such products usually employs alkylating reagents of mixed chain length. It is clear, however, that substantially pure olefins as well as alkylating compounds used in other techniques can and do give alkylated benzene sulfonates wherein the alkyl moiety is substantially (i.e., at least 99%) of one chain length, i.e., C, ,C, C or C,,,. The linear alkyl benzene sulfonates are further characterized by the position of the benzene ring in the linear alkyl chain, with any of the position isomers (i.e., alpha to omega) being operable and contemplated.
The linear alkyl benzene sulfonates are generally and conveniently prepared by sulfonating the corresponding alkyl benzene hydrocarbons which in turn may be prepared by alkylating benzene with a linear alkyl halide, a l-alkene or a linear primary of secondary alcohol. Pure isomers (of the l-phenyl isomer) are prepared by reduction of the acylated Wolff-Kishner reaction. The 2-phenyl isomer is obtained from n-undecyl phenyl ketone and methyl magnesium bromide to form the tertiary alcohol which is dehydrated to the alkene and then hydrogenated. The 5-phenyl isomer is obtained similarly from n-heptyl phenyl ketone and nbuty l magnesium bromide. The other isomers are obtained in a similar manner from the appropriate n-alkyl phenyl ketone and n-alkyl magnesium bromide.
In addition to the benzene sulfonates one may also employ the lower alkyl (C 1 to C analogs of benzene such as toluene, xylene, the trimethyl benzenes, ethylbenzene, isopropyl benzene and the like. The sulfonates are generally employed in the water soluble salt form which includes as the cation, the alkali metals. ammonium and lower amine and alkanolamine.
Examples of suitable linear alkyl benzene sulfonates include:
sodium n-decyl benzene sulfonate sodium n-dodecyl benzene sulfonate sodium n-tridecyl benzene sulfonate sodium n-tetradecyl benzene sulfonate sodium n-pentadecyl benzene sulfonate sodium n-hexadecyl benzene sulfonate and the corresponding lower alkyl substituted homologues of benzene as well as the salts of the cations previously referred to. Mixtures of these sulfonates may, of course, also be used with mixtures which may include compounds wherein the linear alkyl chain is smaller or larger than indicated herein provided that the average chain length in the mixture conforms to the specific requirements of C to C The linear paraffin sulfonates are also a well known group of compounds and include water soluble salts (alkali metal, amine, alkanolamine, and ammonium) of:
l-decane sulfonic acid l-dodecane sulfonic acid l-tridecane sulfonic acid l-tetradecane sulfonic acid l-pentadecane sulfonic acid l-hexadecane sulfonic acid as well as the other position isomers of the sulfonic acid groups.
In addition to the paraffin sulfonates illustrated above, others with the general range of C to C alkyls may be used, with the most preferable range being from 12 to 20- The linear alkyl sulfates which are contemplated in the process and composition of the present invention have alkyl groups in the range of from C to C Specific examples include, sodium n-decyl sulfate; sodium n-dodecyl sulfate; sodium n-hexadecyl sulfate; sodium n-heptaceeyl sulfate; sodium n-octadecyl sulfate; and ethoxylated (l to moles ethylene oxide) derivatives thereof. Of course, other water-soluble salt-forming cations mentioned above may also be used.
The above composition may be applied to the fabric according to the process of the present application by any of a number of methods. The solution may be sprayed onto the fabric utilizing either a mechanical spraying apparatus including a pump valve or an aerosol spray wherein the composition includes a small portion of an aerosol propellant, such as isobutane, and polar hydrocarbon and chlorinated propellants. Also the composition may be sprinkled on the fabrics although an even, finely dispersed spray is preferred since the complexing acid is more evenly dispersed.
Basically, the composition is sprayed onto the fabric either covering the entire fabric if the same is heavily soiled or only upon those areas which require special pre-treatment. Subsequent to the spraying of the fabrics in accordance with the process of the present invention, the fabrics may then be washed in any conventional manner utilizing either non-ionic, anionic or cationic detergents or soaps. Furthermore, since citric acid and the other acids also have some building properties, these materials, when added to the subsequent detergent in water composition, will also enhance the same be performing a supplemental building function, in addition to the original pre-wash complexing function.
Although not wishing to be bound by any specific theory with regard to the method by which the process of the present invention enhances the removal of soils, it appears that the various metal ions present in clay or other type soils complex with the various organic acids in preference to complexing with phenolic materials present in the fabrics which form highly colored stains and prevent these highly colored stains or phenolic complexes from becoming attached firmly to the fibers as phenolic-metal complexes during the wash cycle and thereby forming irremovable metal type stains.
The process and composition of the present invention will now be illustrated by way of the following illustrative examples which are for the purpose of illustration only and are to be taken as no way limiting.
EXAMPLE 1 A series of swatches of a 507r polyester, 50% cotton fabric having a permanent press finish is soiled with a dry clay soil. A second series of similar fabrics is soiled with a Spangler sebum containing particulate soil. The above series of swatches are then sprayed with the treating solutions as shown in Table l. Subsequent to spraying the the swatches are then washed with a detergent containing l27r by weight of a non-ionic detergent, 66% by weight of sodium carbonate, 2.4% by weight of carboxymethylcellulose. 97: by weight of sodium silicate, 2.1% by weight of sodium sulfate, with the balance to 100% being water. Subsequent to washing the average reflectance values of the swatches were then determined with the higher values indicating in- 6 A. 5% citric acid 5% mixed C, alkyl alcohol polyoxyethylene having 7 ehtylene oxide units per molecule B. 3% tartaric acid 7% polyglycerol monolaurate creased whiteness. 5 C. maleic acid 30% sorbitan monostearate Table I Example No. Spray Clay Soil(Rd) Spangler Soi1(Rd) l 5% citric acid 80.9 74.1
2 5% tartaric acid 78.6 73.5 3 5% citric acid 5% Neodol 45-11 82.6 74.3 5% tartaric 4 acid 5% Neodo145-11 81.8 75.5 5 citric acid 83.1 Comp.1 HCI Solution of pH 2 75.4 72.0 Comp.2 5% Neodol 45-11 75.9 74.9 Comp.3 20% sodium citrate 72.3 Comp.4 NONE (control) 70.0 69.3
A mixed c alcohol 1 1E0.
D. 8% succinic acid 4% dodecyl benzene sulfonate Although all the pretreatments i.e.. Examples 1-5 8% tartarie acid 2% sedhlm h'dodeeyl benzene and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 show improved sulfohete whiteness, both with respect to the clay soil and the 4% ("the acid Sodlum ee Sultohate Spangler soil, over Comparative Example 3 which is Each of the above fhlxtul'es when Ptlhled as a P the control utilizing no pre-treatment, improved results W p y generally Increases the 1 removal eapae' are obtained when the complexing acids i.e., citric and of the detergent as reflected y hlgher average f tartaric acids are utilized, either alone or in combinafleetahee Velue of the Swatches Wheh Compared tion with a non-ionic sufactant. Comparative Example slmllal'ly solled Swatches washed the Same detergent 1 indicates that it is not the pH alone which affects the and not havmg the above noted P treatmentswhiteness, while Comparative Example 2 shows that a EXAMPLES 840 AND COMPARATIVE pretreatment with a non-ionic detergent, although im- EXAMPLES proving the whiteness does not improve the same to the degree possible utilizing the complexing acids. Further- 50-50 blehd'of a Polyester eottoh fabne soiled more, Comparative Example 3 shows that although a 40 h y y Sell e sprayed with the p high amount of a citrate or complexing acid salt does Positions as Show" In Table slightly improve the whiteness, the performance of Table 1 these salts is far below the performance of the complex- I N v I g acids themselves- Examp e o. Spra) (lay So1l(Rd) 8 1.0% citric Example 6 acid 80.3
9 5.0% citric The procedure of Example 1, is repeated except that acid I 81.5 the 5% citric acid spray is replaced with the following 2? 81 4 spray compositions: Comp. 5 No spray 79:4 A. 1% citric acid g s p qi' B. 1% tartaric acid f m C. 5% maleic acid Comp. 8 11.1% citric acid 79.7 7% f t f Comp. 9 0.5% citric E. 10% ad1p1c acid acid 79.7 F. 4% succinic acid G. 20% tartaric acid H. 3% tartaric acid, 4% citric acid Subsequent to pretreatment these fabrics are washed 1. 20% maleic acid in a detergent comprising 23% by weight of a linear do- .I. 1% adipic acid decyl benzene sulfonate, 25% by weight of a sodium sil- K. 4% citric acid, 2% maleic acid icate. 4.5% of a non-ionic detergent, 2% by weight of Each of the above noted pretreatment sprays usually carboxymentylcellulose, 2% by weight soap with the increases the whiteness with respect to an un-preremainder being filler and water at a detergent concentreated swatch of similar fabric laundered in the same tration of 1 gram per liter. As shown by Comparative manner. Examples 6-9 which utilize either a water spray or a citric acid spray having a concentration below the con- EXAMPLE 7 The procedure of Example 1 is repeated with the exception that the citric acid spray is replaced by the following spray solutions in water:
centration of complexin g acid in the composition of the present invention. The reflectance values are roughly unchanged from Comparative Example 5. wherein no spray whatsoever is utilized. However. in Examples 7 8-10 which are in accordance with the composition of the present invention the average final refleactance values are higher than Comparative Example wherein no spray at all is utilized.
While the composition and process of the present invention has been illustrated by way of the foregoing specific Examples the same are for the purposes of illustration only and are in no way considered as limitive of the present invention which is properly defined by way of the following appended claims.
What is claimed is:
1. An aqueous pre-wash aerosol spray soil release composition, for use in conjunction with a detergent or soap in a laundering procedure, consisting essentially of from l-% by weight of an organic complexing acid capable of complexing the stain-forming metallic ions in the soil, from about 2 to by weight of a surface active agent and 99-50% by weight of water and an effective amount of an aerosol propellant.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said composition consists essentially of from 5 to 15% by weight of said organic complexing acid and from 95 to 85% by weight water.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein said organic complexing acid is selected from the group consisting of citric acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid, succinic acid and mixtures thereof.
4. The composition of claim 3, wherein said organic complexing acid is citric acid.
5. The composition of claim 4, wherein said citric acid is present in a concentration of 5% by weight.
6. The composition of claim 1, wherein said surface active agent is a non-ionic surface active agent.
7. A process for assisting in the removal of soil complexes from a fabric comprising applying to a soiled fabric a pre-wash composition consisting essentially of from 20% by weight of an organic complexing acid capable of complexing the stain-forming metallic ions in the soil, from 2 to 30% by weight of a non-ionic or anionic surface active agent and from 99-50% by weight of water and laundering said soiled fabric using a washing agent selected from non-ionic detergents, cationic detergents, anionic detergents and soap.
8. The process of claim 7, wherein the composition consists essentially of from 5 to 15% by weight of said organic complexing acid and from 95 to by weight water.
9. The process of claim 7, wherein said organic complexing acid is selected from the group consisting of citric acid, tartaric acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, adipic acid, succinic acid and mixtures thereof.
10. The process of claim 9, wherein said organic complexing acid is citric acid.
11. The process of claim 10, wherein said citric acid is present in a concentration of 5% by weight.
12. The process of claim 7, wherein said surface active agent is a non-ionic surface active agent.
13. The process of claim 7, wherein said composition is sprayed onto said fabrics.
14. The process of claim 7, wherein said composition is applied to said fabric in the form of an aerosol spray.
15. The process of claim 7, wherein said composition is applied to said fabric as a spray discharged from a pump valve.
16. A fabric treated in accordance with the process of claim 7.
17. A fabric treated with the composition of claim 1.
18. A fabric as defined in claim 16 comprised of polyester and cotton.
* k I II!
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2994664 *||Feb 19, 1958||Aug 1, 1961||Nalco Chemical Co||Dry acid cleaning compositions|
|US3003898 *||Aug 10, 1960||Oct 10, 1961||Dow Chemical Co||Scale removal|
|US3003899 *||May 17, 1957||Oct 10, 1961||Dow Chemical Co||Removal of scale deposits|
|US3166444 *||Apr 26, 1962||Jan 19, 1965||Lubrizol Corp||Method for cleaning metal articles|
|US3277008 *||Apr 20, 1962||Oct 4, 1966||Pfaudler Permutit Inc||Surface cleaning method and composition|
|US3650968 *||Apr 30, 1968||Mar 21, 1972||Hoffman Paul||Fisherman's soap|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4093417 *||Jul 29, 1975||Jun 6, 1978||Karl Hans Heinlein||Method for processing textile material|
|US4144093 *||Aug 4, 1977||Mar 13, 1979||Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien||Process for machine washing of soiled articles using a water-insoluble cation-exchange polymer|
|US4264418 *||Sep 19, 1978||Apr 28, 1981||Kilene Corp.||Method for detersifying and oxide coating removal|
|US4295845 *||May 19, 1980||Oct 20, 1981||Lever Brothers Company||Pretreatment composition for stain removal|
|US4363756 *||Oct 20, 1980||Dec 14, 1982||Lever Brothers Company||Pretreatment composition for stain removal|
|US4379834 *||Jun 23, 1982||Apr 12, 1983||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Process for cleaning copper-containing metal surfaces|
|US4457857 *||Jul 2, 1982||Jul 3, 1984||Lever Brothers Company||Pretreatment composition for stain removal|
|US4501680 *||Nov 9, 1983||Feb 26, 1985||Colgate-Palmolive Company||Acidic liquid detergent composition for cleaning ceramic tiles without eroding grout|
|US4738791 *||Jun 20, 1986||Apr 19, 1988||Ertle Raymond T||Laundry pre-spotter composition|
|US4738792 *||Jun 20, 1986||Apr 19, 1988||Ertle Raymond T||Laundry pre-spotter method|
|US4749516 *||Sep 24, 1985||Jun 7, 1988||S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.||Anionic emulsion pre-spotting composition|
|US4828750 *||Dec 2, 1987||May 9, 1989||Colgate-Polmolive Company||Fabric rinse composition to remove surfactant residues|
|US4911860 *||Feb 14, 1989||Mar 27, 1990||Lever Brothers Company||Solid detergent composition: polyalkylene-glycol-mono-ester carrier and synthetic surfactant for laundry pretreatment|
|US4935158 *||Oct 30, 1986||Jun 19, 1990||Aszman Harry W||Solid detergent cleaning composition, reusable cleaning pad containing same and method of manufacture|
|US5186856 *||Jun 2, 1992||Feb 16, 1993||Basf Corp.||Aqueous prewash stain remover compositions with efficacy on tenacious oily stains|
|US5221496 *||Jun 2, 1992||Jun 22, 1993||Basf Corp.||Aqueous prewash stain remover compositions with efficacy on tenacious oily stains|
|US5234719 *||Dec 11, 1992||Aug 10, 1993||Ecolab Inc.||Food additive sanitizing compositions|
|US5244468 *||Jul 27, 1992||Sep 14, 1993||Harris Research, Inc.||Urea containing internally-carbonated non-detergent cleaning composition and method of use|
|US5330769 *||Oct 5, 1993||Jul 19, 1994||West Agro, Inc.||Acid sanitizer|
|US5336500 *||Dec 11, 1992||Aug 9, 1994||Ecolab Inc.||Sanitizing composition comprising a blend of aromatic and polyunsaturated carboxylic acid|
|US5409713 *||Mar 17, 1993||Apr 25, 1995||Ecolab Inc.||Process for inhibition of microbial growth in aqueous transport streams|
|US5419908 *||Dec 8, 1993||May 30, 1995||Ecolab Inc.||Sanitizing composition comprising a blend of aromatic and polyunsaturated carboxylic acids|
|US5436008 *||Aug 5, 1993||Jul 25, 1995||Ecolab Inc.||Sanitizing compositions|
|US5480633 *||Sep 27, 1993||Jan 2, 1996||Colgate-Palmolive Company||Mild cleanser and conditioner to yield soft smooth skin|
|US5529637 *||Feb 17, 1995||Jun 25, 1996||Hydrochem Industrial Services, Inc.||Formic-carboxylic acid mixtures for removing iron oxide sclae from steel surfaces|
|US5578134 *||Apr 19, 1994||Nov 26, 1996||Ecolab Inc.||Method of sanitizing and destaining tableware|
|US5624465 *||Nov 7, 1994||Apr 29, 1997||Harris Research, Inc.||Internally-carbonating cleaning composition and method of use|
|US5656580 *||Dec 2, 1993||Aug 12, 1997||The Procter & Gamble Company||Acidic cleaning compositions self-thickened by a mixture of cationic and nonionic surfactants|
|US5674538 *||Mar 13, 1995||Oct 7, 1997||Ecolab Inc.||Process for inhibition of microbial growth in aqueous food transport or process streams|
|US5679170 *||Dec 8, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Hydrochem Industrial Services, Inc.||Methods for removing iron oxide scale from interior surfaces of steel vessels using formic acid-citric acid mixtures|
|US5683724 *||Jan 17, 1997||Nov 4, 1997||Ecolab Inc.||Automated process for inhibition of microbial growth in aqueous food transport or process streams|
|US5686014 *||Mar 24, 1995||Nov 11, 1997||The Procter & Gamble Company||Bleach compositions comprising manganese-containing bleach catalysts|
|US5695572 *||Aug 10, 1995||Dec 9, 1997||Wacker Siltronic Gesellschaft Fur Halbleitermaterialien Aktiengesellschaft||Cleaning agent and method for cleaning semiconductor wafers|
|US5733859 *||Feb 2, 1995||Mar 31, 1998||The Procter & Gamble Company||Maleic acid-based aqueous cleaning compositions and methods of using same|
|US6257253||Apr 19, 1994||Jul 10, 2001||Ecolab Inc.||Percarboxylic acid rinse method|
|US6302968||May 22, 1995||Oct 16, 2001||Ecolab Inc.||Precarboxylic acid rinse method|
|US6699825||Jan 12, 2001||Mar 2, 2004||S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.||Acidic hard-surface antimicrobial cleaner|
|US7026278||Jun 20, 2001||Apr 11, 2006||The Procter & Gamble Company||Rinse-added fabric treatment composition, kit containing such, and method of use therefor|
|US9534190||Dec 20, 2012||Jan 3, 2017||Ecolab Usa Inc.||Citrate salt bathroom cleaners|
|US20030060390 *||Mar 5, 2002||Mar 27, 2003||The Procter & Gamble Company||Rinse-added fabric conditioning composition for use where residual detergent is present|
|US20060005316 *||Jul 7, 2004||Jan 12, 2006||Durrant Edward E||Carbonated cleaning composition and method of use|
|US20060019867 *||Aug 24, 2005||Jan 26, 2006||Demeyere Hugo J M||Rinse-added fabric conditioning composition for use where residual detergent is present|
|US20060030516 *||Oct 5, 2005||Feb 9, 2006||Demeyere Hugo J M||Rinse-added fabric conditioning composition for use where residual detergent is present|
|US20060075576 *||Nov 17, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Price Kenneth N||Rinse-added fabric treatment composition, kit containing such, and method of use therefor|
|US20070028394 *||Oct 2, 2006||Feb 8, 2007||Harris Research, Inc.||Method of cleaning textile fibers|
|EP0216355A2 *||Sep 23, 1986||Apr 1, 1987||S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.||Aqueous laundry prespotting composition|
|EP0216355A3 *||Sep 23, 1986||Aug 31, 1988||S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC.||Aqueous laundry prespotting composition|
|EP0546828A1 *||Dec 10, 1992||Jun 16, 1993||Unilever Plc||Hard surface cleaners|
|WO1993009213A1 *||Nov 7, 1991||May 13, 1993||Gycor International Ltd.||Nontoxic sanitizing cleaner|
|WO1995027772A1 *||Mar 30, 1995||Oct 19, 1995||The Procter & Gamble Company||Method for bleaching fabrics using manganese-containing bleach catalysts|
|U.S. Classification||8/137, 510/284, 134/41, 134/3, 510/528|
|International Classification||C11D17/00, C11D3/20|
|Cooperative Classification||C11D17/0043, C11D3/2075|
|European Classification||C11D3/20E, C11D17/00E|