|Publication number||US3915843 A|
|Publication date||Oct 28, 1975|
|Filing date||Dec 7, 1973|
|Priority date||Dec 8, 1972|
|Also published as||DE2360092A1|
|Publication number||US 3915843 A, US 3915843A, US-A-3915843, US3915843 A, US3915843A|
|Inventors||Alain Billon, Michel Derrien, Jean-Pierre Franck|
|Original Assignee||Inst Francais Du Petrole|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (31), Classifications (22)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
Unite States Patent Franck et a1.
[ Oct. 28, 1975 HYDROCRACKING PROCESS AND CATALYST FOR PRODUCING MULTIGRADE 01L 0F IMPROVED QUALITY Inventors: Jean-Pierre Franck, Bougival;
Michel Derrien, Rueil-Malmaison; Alain Billon, Lyon, all of France lnstitut Francais du Petrole, des Carburants et Lubrifiants Filed: Dec. 7, 1973 Appl. No.: 422,902
References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Egan et a1 208/59 Orkin et a1 208/60 Divijak 208/89 Estes et al.... 208/112 Mead et a1... 208/58 Ladeur 208/110 Bennett et a1. 208/111 Ladeur et a1. 208/108 Primary Examiner-Delbert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-G. E. Schmitkons Attorney, Agent, or FirmMillen, Raptes & White ABSTRACT Lube oils which may be used as direct multigrade lube oils are obtained from paraffins, particularly from hydrocracking paraffins, by hydrogenation in the presence of both a group VIII noble metal carried on halogenated alumina and ammonia, followed with dewaxing.
11 Claims, No Drawings HYDROCRACKING PROCESS AND CATALYST FOR PRODUCING MULTIGRADE OIL OF IMPROVED QUALITY TABLE I Multigrades Vl(ASTM D-567) Viscosity cst Viscosity cst at 378 C at 989 C W 20 100 to 145 30 to 50 5.8 to 9.6 10W 30 130 to 150 50 to 77 9.6 to 13 10W40 140 70 13 to 17 20 W 20 20 to 130 42 to 85 5.8 to 9.6 20 W 30 90 to 138 70 to 120 9.6 to 13 20W40 110 to 143 to 17 A multigrade oil is conventionally prepared by admixing a very fluid base oil with variable amounts of a polymer, for example of the polymethacrylate type, which both improves the viscosity characteristics versus temperature and thickens the oil. The conventional viscosity additives are usually less stable than the oil when subjected to mechanical actions (shearing effect) and to the temperature effect.
It would be quite advantageous to dispose of multigrade oils free of viscosity additives and therefore more stable. The process of the invention provides such oils.
When such oils are directly obtained by a refining process, they are called direct multigrade oils.
The direct multigrade oils obtained according to the process of the invention may obviously be used with conventional viscosity additives so as to provide other types of multigrade oils.
The paraffins treated according to the process of the invention are preferably hydrocracking paraffins obtained by dewaxing a lubricating oil base resulting from the hydrocracking or hydrorefining of vacuum distillates or deasphalted vacuum residues, such as described, for example, in French Patent No. 1,582,758 (U.S. Pat. No. 3,365,390). These paraffins are nor mally solid at room temperature (20C). Reference is also made to U.S. Pat. No. 3,560,370 and to the French patent application 7,1 12,416 and U.S. Pat. application 241,690 filed Apr. 6, 1972, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,793,191.
The state of the art may be illustrated by U.S. Pat. No. 3,365,390 according to which a lubricating oil, which is not a direct multigrade oil, is produced by hydroisomerizing a normally solid paraffin in the presence of a reforming catalyst such as platinum-onalumina, the hydroisomerizing step being followed with a dewaxing step.
We have now found that the yield of direct multigrade oil can be increased provided that (l) the catalyst contains a critical halogen amount and (1) the operation is carried out under a critical ammonia pressure.
The invention is thus concerned with a process for manufacturing multigrade oils, according to which a mixture of hydrogen and paraffin is contacted with a catalyst comprising an alumina carrier, at least one noble metal of group VIII of the periodic classification and from 0.1 to 5% by weight of halogen, at a temperature of from 300 to 450C, the global product is fractionated and the oil obtained after said fractionation is dewaxed for removing at least a fraction of the unconverted paraffins, the process being remarkable in that said contacting step is carried out under an ammonia partial pressure of from 1 to 500 g/cm Normally solid hydrocracking paraffins may be obtained, for example, by contacting hydrogen and oil vacuum or deasphalted vacuum residues, normally boiling, at least partly, above 450C, with a hydrocracking catalyst, under hydrocracking conditions, fractionating the resulting product so as to isolate therefrom a fraction normally boiling above 380C and preferably above 430C and dewaxing said fraction according to a known technique, for example as described hereinafter with respect to the isomerized paraffin.
Hydrocracking catalysts are known to contain, as rule, one or more metals or compounds of metals from groups VI and/or VIII, for example molybdenum, tungsten, nickel, cobalt and/ or platinum incorporated toor carried onan acidic carrier, for example alumina-silica or halogen-containing alumina. The process is carried out, for example, as follows:
temperature of from 300 to 480C pressure of from 30 to 200 kg/cm hydrocarbon hourly feed rate of from 0.3 to 5 volumes per volume of catalyst.
hydrogen feed rate of from 500 to 5000 liters per liter of feed charge. 7
The so-obtained hydrocracking paraffins, or at least a major portion thereof, have a molecular weight higher than 500, the average. molecular weight of the paraffin feedstock being higher than about 400. Their viscosity is conventionally 8 to 20 centistokes at 989 C, their viscosity index about 130, their sulfur content lower than 30 ppm (parts per million of parts) by weight and their nitrogen content lower than 5 ppm by weight.
The hydroisomerization reaction is carried out at a temperature of from 250 to 450C, preferably from 300 to 390C. The pressure may range, for example, from 10 to 150 kg/cm and preferably from 30 to 100 kg/cm The hourly feed rate by volume (VVH) is usefully of from 02m 5 liters, preferably from 0.5 to 2 liters of liquid hydrocarbons per liter of catalyst. The gaseous hydrogen feed rate is, for example, 300 to 3000, preferably 500 to 1500 liters per liter of liquid hydrocarbons under the normal temperature and pressure conditions. In these conditions, the hydrocarbon feed charge is practically 100% liquid. The feed charge may be supplied to the top of the reactor, which results in a trickling phase operation in hydrogen atmosphere,
although an ascending flow of the reactants may also be used.
We have found that'the quality of the final oil could be further improved by recycling a portion of the oil obtained after appropriate treatment of the reactor effluent, for example after distillation or dewaxing.
The specific catalysts employed and the purity of the charge permit the reaction to take place under moderate conditions (a pressure of from 50 to 80 kg/cm and a temperature of from 300 to 390C), so that the resulting oil has a negligible content of aromatics. When using platinum on fluorinated alumina as catalyst, we obtain at 350C, 45% by weight of oil of a 135 VI, whose aromatic content is substantially negligible, whereas at 420C the obtained oil contains 15% of aromatic hydrocarbons.
As a result of this negligible aromatic hydrocarbon content it is unnecessary to subject the liquid product obtained by the process of the invention to a hydrofmishing treatment, this being a great advantage from an economic point of view.
The hydroisomerization treatment according to the invention is carried out in the presence of catalysts consisting of one or more noble metals of group VIII and- /or their alloys incorporated toor carried onan acid support of the halogen-containing alumina type. The use of noble metals is possible owing to the great purity of the feed charge, in particular its very low sulfur content. Mixtures of metals may be used, for example platinum iridium, platinum cobalt, platinum rhenium, platinum germanium or platinum gold.
We have found that the best catalysts for the process of the invention are those of the platinum-aluminahalogen type, the preferred halogen being fluorine. The halogen content of the catalyst may be advantageously selected within the range of from 0.1 to 5% by weight and preferably 0.3 to 0.8% for fluorine and 0.3 to 3% for chlorine.
The halogen and noble metal of the catalyst may be supplied according to well-known methods, for example those used when manufacturing reforming catalysts.
The results obtained by using both ammonia and a halogen-containing catalyst are unobvious since ammonia has a detrimental effect (yield decrease) when employed with a halogen-free platinum-on-alumina catalyst.
The hydroisomerization product may be fractionated, for example, as follows:
a cut boiling above 380C which is dewaxed to yield a base oil whose viscosity index is from 130 to 150 with a viscosity higher than 7 centistokes at 989 C and a melting point of, for example, -20C; this base oil conforms to the 10 W multigrade oil standard;
a gas oil cut (250-3 80C) whose diesel number is at least 90; its cetane number is higher than 70 (the motor gas oil specification requires a cetane number of at least 50);
a jet fuel cut l50250C) whose smoke point is better than 45 mm (the kerosene specification mentions a smoke point of at least 21 mm);
a 80-I 50C cut of high isoparaffin content, substantially free of naphthenes and aromatics, which may constitute a reforming feed charge or a good constituent of the gasoline pool;
a light fraction 80C) of high isoparaffin content (iso C iso C and iso C The high quality of the by-products, their very low content of impurities (nitrogen and sulfur) give an additional value to the conversion: the jet cut is of particular interest since it constitutes about 50% of the 80380C cut, i.e. it represents a yield of from 10 to 20% with respect to the initial paraffin.
The dewaxing treatment applied to the oil obtained by hydroisomerization may be carried out according to any known method, for example by treatment with a solvent such as methyl-isobutyl-ketone or a pair of solvents such as a mixture of methyl-ethyl-ketone with toluene, at a temperature from 0C to C. The invention is not limited to a particular mode of dewaxing. The paraffin obtained may also be deoiled according to known methods.
The paraffins obtained after dewaxing of the fraction boiling above 380C may be recycled, if so desired, before or after a second deoiling step depending on the fact that the oil is recycled or not; in many cases, a second deoiling step increases the oil yield.
The oils according to the invention have the further advantage of remarkably homogeneous distributions of both the viscosity and the viscosity index. These distributions may be determined from the rheological characteristics of the various fractions obtained by thermal diffusion of the base oil.
In the following examples, the hydroisomerization charge has been prepared as follows:
A deasphalted vacuum residuum (d, 0.928; S 2.58 by weight; N 800 ppm by weight; viscosity at 989C =35.7 cst) has been hydrorefined in the presence of a catalyst whose characteristics are as follows:
Composition: A1 0 56 by weight SiO 20 70 by weight M00; 16 by weight NiO 8 by weight Specific surface 250 m /g The catalyst was previously sulfurized with H S diluted with H in the following conditions:
T 320C (6 hours) H S/I-I 4/100 (molar) The operating conditions were the following:
Pressure kg/cm VVH 0.5 liter of feed charge per liter of catalyst per hour H lhydrocarbon charge I000 liters per liter.
The resulting oil was distilled and the distillation residue, boiling above 380C was collected and dewaxed at 22C by means of methyl-isobutyl-ketone.
We have obtained, on the one hand, an oil of a V.I. (yield 42 by weight) and, on the other hand, solid paraffins (yield 8 by weight) which constitute the hydroisomerization charge of the following examples and whose essential characteristics are given in example 1.
EXAMPLE 1 (comparison) Manufacture of a direct 10 W 20 multigrade oil by hydroisomerization of hydrotreated paraffins with a halogen-free catalyst, without ammonia.
Characteristics of the feed charge S 20 ppm by weight N 2 ppm by weight Viscosity at 989 C l0 cst Average molecular weight 620 CI-I /Cl-I ratio 0.065
Catalyst of platinum on alumina Operating conditions Pressure 60 kg/cm VVl-l 1 Hydrogen gas/liquid hydrocarbons liter (NTP) Ammonia partial pressure 0 After hydroisomerization by distillation of the reactor effluent, we obtained the following fractions:
B.P. 80C light gasoline 80l50C naphtha 150250C jet fuel 250-380C motor gas oil 380 C lubricating oil fraction The lubricating oil fraction was dewaxed at 20C by means of a mixture of methyl-ethyl-ketone and toluene in a ratio of III by volume.
In these conditions, the oil yield was 40 by weight and the uncoverted paraffin yield 25 by weight.
The resulting oil complies with the W specification (Table l) and has the following characteristics:
Viscosity at 378C 40.9 cst Viscosity at 989 C 7 cst Pour point l8C Initial boiling point 380C Cleveland flash point 228C CH /CH 0.08
S ppm by weight 10 N ppm by weight 2 Conradson carbon 0.02
EXAMPLE 2 (comparision) The feed charge of example No. l is treated in the presence of the same catalyst to which 0.5 by weight of fluorine has been added by impregnation with H BF The operating conditions are as follows:
Pressure 60 kg/cm H lhydrocarbons 1000 liters per liter (NTP) Nl-l partial pressure 1 0 The outflow is fractionated as described in example 1. In these conditions 41 by weight of oil and by weight of unconverted paraffins have been obtained.
The oil does not conform to the 10 W 20 specification since it has the following characteristics:
Viscosity at 378 C 32 cst Viscosity at 989 C 5.5 cst pour point l8C Initial boiling point 380C Cleveland flash point 228C Cl-l lCl-l 0.10
S ppm by weight 10 N ppm by weight 2 Conradson carbon 0.02
1000 liters per EXAMPLE 3 The feed charge of example No. l is treated with the catalyst of example No. 2 with an ammonia partial pressure of 30 g/cm in the reactor.
The operating conditions are:
Pressure 60 kg/cm pp Nl-l 0.03 kg/cm VVl-l 1 Pi /hydrocarbons 1000 liters per liter (NTP) The operation is carried out as in example 1 and we obtain 45 by weight of 10 W 20 oil and 28 by weight of unconverted paraffins.
The oil has the following properties:
Viscosity at 378 C: 41 cst Viscosity at 989 C: 7 cst VI: Pour point: l8C Initial boiling point: 380C Cleveland flash point: 232C Cri /CH 0.16 S ppm by weight 10 N ppm by weight 2 Conradson carbon 0.02
The desired isomerizing effect is illustrated by the change of the ratio from 0.065 to 0.16.
The oil has the following hydrocarbon composition:
% by volume Isoparaffins 83.7 Naphthenes 16. 3 Aromatics about 0 The yields of other products are weight/charge C C +C 0.97
c. 2.73 (i/n 1.5 5 1.98 (i/n 3.2) C 80C 1.32 80 C 2.40 150 250C 8.80 250 380C 8.80
EXAMPLE 4 Viscosity at 3782 18 cst Viscosity at 9891 4 cst VI: 130 Pour point: -1 8C Initial boiling point: 380C Cleveland flash point: 220C CH /CH O. l 5 5 ppm by weight l N ppm by weight 2 Conradson carbon 0.02
This oil does not satisfy the requirements of 10 W/20 multigrade oil standard.
EXAMPLE 5 Example 3 is repeated, except that the first dewaxing step is followed with a seconddeoiling step.
In that case, the overall yields of oil and paraffins are:
Paraffins 25 by weight oil 48 by weight In that case, a second deoiling step resulted in a 3 points increase of the yield of W/ oil; the rheological properties of this oil are the following:
Viscosity at 378 C 44 est Viscosity at 989 C 7.2 cst viscosity index 135 This yield increase is accompanied with a slight viscosity improvement which is a further advantage. The deoiling step following the first dewaxing step of the hydroisomerization product has resulted in the recovery of highly paraffinic heavy compounds.
EXAMPLE 6 7' Example 3 is repeated with the catalyst of example 1 to which 0.5 by weight of fluorine have been added by impregnation, with hydrofluoric acid.
The resulting 10 W 20 oil has practically the same characteristics as the oil obtained in example 3. The oil yield is 44 29 by weight of unconverted paraffins have been recovered.
1. A process for manufacturing a multigrade oil, in which a mixture of hydrogen with a paraffin wax containing less than 5 ppm. by weight of nitrogen is contacted with a catalyst comprising an alumina carrier, at least one noble metal of group VIII and 0.1 to 5% by weight of halogen at a temperature of from 250 to 450C, the oil obtained is dewaxed so as to remove therefrom at least one fraction of unconverted paraffin wax, said process comprising carrying said contact under an ammonia partial pressure of from 1 to 500 g/cm 2. A process according to claim 1, wherein said paraffin wax is wax recovered from hydrocrackate 3. A process according to claim 2, wherein the ammonia partial pressure is from 10 to glcm 4. A process according to claim 2, wherein the catalyst contains from 0.3 to 0.8 by weight of fluorine.
5. A process according to claim 2, wherein the catalyst contains from 0.3 to 3 by weight of chlorine.
6. A process according to claim 1, wherein the contacting pressure is from 10 to kglcm 7. A process according to claim 2, wherein the temperature is 300390C and the pressure is from 50 80 kglcm 8. A process according to claim 2, wherein the group VIII metal is platinum.
9. A process according to claim 2, wherein the average molecular weight of the paraffin wax is higher than 400.
10. A process according to claim 1, wherein the said paraffin wax is obtained by dewaxing an oil fraction boiling in the range of the lubricating oils.
11. A process according to claim 1, wherein the unconverted paraffin wax is contacted again with the catalyst and hydrogen.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3487005 *||Feb 12, 1968||Dec 30, 1969||Chevron Res||Production of low pour point lubricating oils by catalytic dewaxing|
|US3530061 *||Jul 16, 1969||Sep 22, 1970||Mobil Oil Corp||Stable hydrocarbon lubricating oils and process for forming same|
|US3629096 *||Jun 21, 1967||Dec 21, 1971||Atlantic Richfield Co||Production of technical white mineral oil|
|US3711399 *||Dec 24, 1970||Jan 16, 1973||Texaco Inc||Selective hydrocracking and isomerization of paraffin hydrocarbons|
|US3790470 *||Dec 6, 1972||Feb 5, 1974||Texaco Inc||Production of lubricating oils|
|US3794580 *||Feb 26, 1973||Feb 26, 1974||Shell Oil Co||Hydrocracking process|
|US3804742 *||Apr 2, 1973||Apr 16, 1974||British Petroleum Co||Production of lubricating oils|
|US3830723 *||Mar 21, 1973||Aug 20, 1974||Shell Oil Co||Process for preparing hvi lubricating oil by hydrocracking a wax|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4139492 *||Aug 10, 1977||Feb 13, 1979||American Cyanamid Company||Hydrotreating catalysts|
|US4851109 *||May 9, 1988||Jul 25, 1989||Mobil Oil Corporation||Integrated hydroprocessing scheme for production of premium quality distillates and lubricants|
|US4900707 *||Dec 13, 1988||Feb 13, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Method for producing a wax isomerization catalyst|
|US4906601 *||Dec 16, 1988||Mar 6, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Small particle low fluoride content catalyst|
|US4923588 *||Dec 16, 1988||May 8, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Wax isomerization using small particle low fluoride content catalysts|
|US4929795 *||Dec 13, 1988||May 29, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Method for isomerizing wax to lube base oils using an isomerization catalyst|
|US4937399 *||Dec 13, 1988||Jun 26, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Method for isomerizing wax to lube base oils using a sized isomerization catalyst|
|US4943672 *||Dec 13, 1988||Jul 24, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Process for the hydroisomerization of Fischer-Tropsch wax to produce lubricating oil (OP-3403)|
|US4959337 *||Dec 13, 1988||Sep 25, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Wax isomerization catalyst and method for its production|
|US4975177 *||Jul 17, 1989||Dec 4, 1990||Mobil Oil Corporation||High viscosity index lubricants|
|US4992159 *||Dec 16, 1988||Feb 12, 1991||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Upgrading waxy distillates and raffinates by the process of hydrotreating and hydroisomerization|
|US5059299 *||May 11, 1990||Oct 22, 1991||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Method for isomerizing wax to lube base oils|
|US5064546 *||Mar 16, 1988||Nov 12, 1991||Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd.||Lubricating oil composition|
|US5158671 *||Dec 13, 1988||Oct 27, 1992||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Method for stabilizing hydroisomerates|
|US5273672 *||Apr 8, 1991||Dec 28, 1993||Idemitsu Kosan Company Limited||Lubricating oil composition containing a partial ester of a polyhydric alcohol and a substituted succinic acid ester|
|US6103101 *||Jun 9, 1997||Aug 15, 2000||Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras||Process for producing lube base oils of high viscosity index and diesel oil of high cetaned number|
|US6274029||Dec 16, 1999||Aug 14, 2001||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production|
|US6296757||Oct 17, 1995||Oct 2, 2001||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production|
|US6309432||Jun 16, 1998||Oct 30, 2001||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Synthetic jet fuel and process for its production|
|US6313363||Apr 12, 1999||Nov 6, 2001||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for isomerizing aromatic compounds containing eight carbon atoms|
|US6333289||Apr 9, 1999||Dec 25, 2001||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for activating catalysts for isomerizing aromatic compounds containing eight carbon atoms|
|US6350929||Sep 9, 1999||Feb 26, 2002||Institut Francais Du Petrole||Process for isomerizing and dehydrogenating using a catalyst activated by sulfurization and passivation with ammonia or precursor thereof|
|US6607568||Jan 26, 2001||Aug 19, 2003||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production (law3 1 1)|
|US6669743||Feb 27, 2001||Dec 30, 2003||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Synthetic jet fuel and process for its production (law724)|
|US6822131||Nov 17, 1997||Nov 23, 2004||Exxonmobil Reasearch And Engineering Company||Synthetic diesel fuel and process for its production|
|US6989417 *||Mar 16, 2001||Jan 24, 2006||Landec Corporation||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|US7101928 *||Sep 17, 1999||Sep 5, 2006||Landec Corporation||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|US7449511||Aug 8, 2005||Nov 11, 2008||Landec Corp.||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|US20010018484 *||Mar 16, 2001||Aug 30, 2001||Bitler Steven P.||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|US20050272615 *||Aug 8, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Bitler Steven P||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|US20050272618 *||Aug 8, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Bitler Steven P||Polymeric thickeners for oil-containing compositions|
|U.S. Classification||208/112, 208/58, 585/749, 208/139, 208/60, 208/18, 208/59|
|International Classification||C10G65/04, C10G45/58, C10G45/62, C10G67/04, B01J23/00, C10G73/02, B01J27/00, C10G65/12|
|Cooperative Classification||C10G2400/10, C10G65/12, C10G65/043, C10G67/04|
|European Classification||C10G65/12, C10G67/04, C10G65/04D|