|Publication number||US3926568 A|
|Publication date||Dec 16, 1975|
|Filing date||Aug 28, 1974|
|Priority date||Oct 30, 1972|
|Publication number||US 3926568 A, US 3926568A, US-A-3926568, US3926568 A, US3926568A|
|Inventors||John Stanwood Benjamin, Jay Ward Schultz|
|Original Assignee||Int Nickel Co|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (31), Classifications (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
United States Patent [1 Benjamin et al.
1 HIGH STRENGTH CORROSION RESISTANT NICKEL-BASE ALLOY  Inventors: John Stanwood Benjamin; Jay Ward Schultz, both of Suffern, NY.
 Assignee: The International Nickel Company,
Inc., New York, NY.
 Filed: Aug. 28, 1974  Appl. No.: 501,052
Related US. Application Data  Continuation-impart of Ser. Nos. 375,530, July 2, 1973, abandoned, and Ser. No. 302.201, Oct. 30, 1972, abandoned,
 US. Cl. 29/1825; 75/.5 R; 75/.5 BC;
75/122; 75/171  Int. Cl. C22C 29/00; C22C 19/05  Field of Search 75/.5 BC, .5 BB, .5 BA,
 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS 3,591,362 7/1971 Benjamin 75/211 X Dec. 16, 1975 Benjamin 29/1825 Benjamin 75!.5 BC
Primary Examiner-L. Dewayne Rutledge Assistant ExaminerArthur J. Steiner Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Raymond .1. Kenny; Ewan C. MacQueen  ABSTRACT 12 Claims, No Drawings HIGH STRENGTH CORROSION RESISTANT NICKEL-BASE ALLOY The subject application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. Nos. 375,530 filed 7/2/73 and 302,201, tiled 10/30/72 both of which are now abandoned.
The present invention is directed to the so-termed superalloys, and particularly to precipitation harden able, dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloys capable of operating exceptionally well at both intermediate and elevated temperatures and under corrosive conditions.
By reason of the many advances in aircraft design, the metallurgical community has been under a continuous challenge to develop alloys capable of withstanding the more severe service conditions inherently imposed, notably increased speeds at higher temperatures and greater load-bearing capacities. In recent years, primary emphasis has probably been addressed to performance characteristics at the more elevated temperature levels, to wit, 1700-2000F. There are, however, those components of which more is demanded witness, for example, the blades of a gas turbine engine. As is known, different sections of the blades are exposed to completely different combinations of temperature and stress. In this regard, the outer portions of the blades operate at temperatures upwards of 1700F. whereas the platform portion closer to the axis of the engine might operate at temperatures on the level of l200 to 1400F., but the latter is subjected to tremendously greater stress due to the centrifugal nature of the loading in a rotating part.
The fact that an alloy might respond favorably at the higher temperature plateaus, does not invoke the corollary that it is also capable of performing satisfactorily at temperatures on the order of 12001400F. The product known as TD nickel has fairly good strength at the high temperatures but manifests a distinct propensity to undergo premature creep at the intermediate temperature levels.
The problem becomes somewhat compounded where excellent resistance to corrosion, particularly oxidation and/or sulfidation, is of necessity. For as we have found a given alloy may display acceptable values in terms of stress rupture characteristics at temperature only to suffer a pronounced susceptibility to corrosive attack.
The thrust of the subject invention is, accordingly, to bring together in one alloy the capability of delivering outstanding stress rupture strength at both intermediate (1400F.) and elevated (1900F.) temperature levels and good resistance to oxidation and/or sulfidation. In this connection and insofar as we are aware, the subject alloys afford the highest combination of strength and corrosion resistance known in the superalloy art.
Generally speaking, alloys contemplated in accordance herewith contain (weight percent) about 13 to 17%, e.g., 13.25 to 16.25%, chromium; about 2.5 to 6%, e.g., 2.75 to 5.25%, aluminum; about 2 to 4.25% titanium, the sum of the aluminum plus titanium being preferably at least about about 1.75 to about 4.25% or 4.5% molybdenum; about 3.75 to about 6.25% tungsten; up to 4%, e.g., up to 3%, tantalum, about 0.02 to 0.5%, e.g., 0.05 to about 0.175%, zirco nium; about 0.001 to 0.025% boron. a small but effective amount, e.g., 0.2% or 0.5%, and up to about 2% of 2 yttria; up to 0.2% and advantageously not more than 0.125% carbon; and the balance essentially nickel.
Within the foregoing ranges, where the emphasis is on oxidation resistance as well as stress-rupture strength, the alloys should contain at least 3.5% aluminum. 13.75% or more of chromium and not more than about 3% titanium. 1n striving for the optimum by way of resistance to sulfidation then the percentages of aluminum, titanium and tungsten should be correlated such that the aluminum is from 2.75% to 4.6%, the titanium is at least 2.4% and the tungsten is at least 4.75%, the sum of the titanium plus tungsten benefcially being at least 7.75%. For both oxidation and sulfidation resistance coupled with high strength the alloys should contain about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.4 to 3% or 3.25% titanium, and from about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, the other constituents being within the ranges first given.
In terms of the individual alloying constituents, it would appear that a number of interactive or conflicting forces are involved, their respective roles being difficult to delineate at best. Seemingly, these interactions are particularly pronounced in respect of both oxidation and sulfidation resistance. For example, chromium, titanium and tungsten impart a most potent effect in achieving optimum resistance to sulfidation. By the same token, titanium and tungsten, for example, tend to detract from 1900F. stress rupture strength, although not at 1400F. Chromium and aluminum are indispensible in conferring resistance to oxidation yet aluminum at 1900" is deemed somewhat detrimental whereas chromium impairs stress-rupture properties at both 1400 and 1900F. Such considerations are indicative of the careful balance of chemistry required. Indeed, this balance is further required to develop a proper grain structure as detailed more fully herein.
With regard to yttria, it confers high stress-rupture strength, particularly at the higher temperature levels (1900F.). A small amount of this constituent, e.g., 0.4%, is effective in imparting this benefit, though it is preferred that about 0.5 to 1.5% be present. Percentages of yttria above 2% are unnecessary. Tantalum enhances strength characteristics especially in the 1200l400F. Temperature region. From 1.5 to 3% of this element is deemed beneficial.
1n referring to nickel as constituting the balance" or balance essentially in respect of the above composition, the presence of other elements in amounts which do not adversely affect the basic characteristics of the alloys is not excluded. In this connection, the alloys may contain up to 3% columbium (although they are preferably columbium free); up to 10% cobalt; up to 3% hafnium; up to 0.75% or 1% oxygen; up to 3% iron (as a contaminant); and up to 0.3% nitrogen. But it is most preferred, as will be shown hereinafter, that nitrogen not exceeded about 0.1% particularly in seeking the optimum of sulfidation resistance. Cobalt has a negative efiect at 1900F. and should, if present, he held to less than 8%. In addition, while yttria is very much preferred as the added dispersoid constituent, other refractory dispersoids, e.g., thoria and lanthana, can partially replace or be used in lieu thereof where a lesser combination of overall properties can be tolerated. Other refractory dispersoids can be present aside from the aforementioned yttria, lanthana and thoria, including the oxides, carbides. borides, and nitrides (provided the total nitrogen content does not exceed about 0.1%) of one or more materials such as thorium, zirconium, hafnium, titanium and oxides of aluminum, yttrium, lanthanum, cerium, etc. It is to be also understood that a given range for a particular element of the alloys can be used with a given range for any other element.
In carrying the invention into practice, the alloys should be produced by the mechanical alloying process as described in US. Pat. No. 3,591,362 and incorporated herein by reference. As is known, mechanical alloying involves the dry, intensive high energy milling of a powder charge whereby the initial powder constituents are simultaneously fragmented and cold bonded to provide a homogeneous, intimate interdispersion of alloying elements in the form of composite particles corresponding to the alloy composition desired. In this connection, the impacting elements used are preferably hard and impact resistant such as through hardened 52100 steel. Using a 4 gallon attritor mill, for example, a ball-to-powder ratio of about 15:1 to 25:1 by volume is preferred, the impeller speed being suitably conducted over the range of 250 to 300 rpm for a period of about 12 to 24 hours. For processing in a gal. attritor a speed of 150-200 rpm can be used, a period of 15-40 hours being satisfactory. Larger attritors permit of reduced impeller speeds.
Subsequent to mechanical alloying the composite alloy product particles can be compacted as by hot extrusion. A temperature of about 1800 to 2125F. is
of the processing, a dynamic atmosphere of air and nitrogen was supplied. 1n the case of Alloy A, 16 cc per minute of air and 400 cc per minute of nitrogen were used whereas for Alloys B and C 12 and 9 cc of air was employed, the amount of nitrogen being the same.
The coarsest 5% of the powders was removed, the remainder being packed in 3% inch diameter mild steel cans, sealed, heated to 1950F. and then extruded through dies (0.75 inch for Alloy A and 0.875 inch for Alloys B and C) using glass and grease as a lubricant. An extrusion speed of approximately 3 to 4 inches per second was measured.
The alloys were then subjected to a germinative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) consisting of heating for one half hour at 2300F. for Alloys A and B and 2250F. for Alloy C. After aging at 1550F. for approximately 24 hours, microstructural examination revealed that the alloys exhibited a desired coarse grain structure elongated in the direction of extrusion.
Each of the three alloys was then stress rupture tested at both 1400F. and 1900F. and also tested for cyclic oxidation and sulfidation resistance. The oxidation test was conducted at 1100C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature each 24 hours. A crucible sulfidation test was used and this comprised partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a 90% Na SO 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F. The analyzed comitions and results of the various tests are reported in suitable and an extrusion ratio of about 10:1 25:1 is Tables 1 [[1 below TABLE 1 COMPOSITION Cr Al Ti Mo w v 0, Zr B Fe 0 N Alloy m 13.9 4.8 2.4 3.7 3.9 1.1 0.1 0.005 1.1 0.58 0.16 B 13.5 4.2 3 4 s 1.1 0.15 0.01 0.7 0.5 0.14 c" 15.0 4.5 2.75 3.5 5.5 1.1 0.15- 0.015 1.6 0.67 0.17
contained 2.4% tantalum "nominal composition plus 2.5% tantalum balance nickel and impurities quite satisfactory. Thereupon, the extruded piece can T LE [I be hot worked if desired.
ES PT RE D It is most importan t thatthe alloys then be treated to Test i E S 38 9 a}: H RR develop a germinatlve grain growth such that a micro- Alloy ps Hrs. 7: structure is produced characterized by coarse elon- A 900 25900 10.3 2.4 u gated grains having a high aspect ratio, e.g., 2:1 to 900 20.000 113.3 2.4 2.4 upwards of 100:1 This comprises subjecting the alloys Q 32% gg:% 1%; a; :2 to a heat treatment within the temperature range of 1400 35,000 37.2 2.4 3.5 approximately 2125 to about 2300F. If lower temper- C fg-ggg. 33- a atures are used such as on the order of 2100 F., the 1400 75,000 1m alloys will retain the fine grain of the extruded structure 1400 35-000 0 8 and this is undesirable. On the other hand, should the .calcumd temperature appreciably exceed 2300F., then incipient liquation will develop and this is also undesirable. Following this treatment within the temperature range TA LE "I of about l250 to 2000F., beneficially from 1450 to CORROSON DATA 1600F., for a period of from about 16 to 30 hours. D Oxidation Sulfidation The following will serve to illustrate various aspects Alloy i AT of the invention. a
A series of three alloys were prepared, Alloys A, B Q and C, Table l, by mechanical alloying. The charges, c 500 13 rug/cm 100 21 which consisted of both elemental and master alloy powders, were placed in a 4 gallon attritor containing about 162-163 pounds of 5/16 inch diameter through hardened steel balls. The charges were processed for about 16 /2 hours, the impeller speed of the attritor being maintained at about 288 rpm. During the course With regard to the above data, it will be observed that Alloy A exhibited a stress rupture life of well over hours at 1900F. under a stress of 20,000 psi. At 1400F. it similarly displayed a stress rupture life above 100 hours notwithstanding the exceptionally high stress level of 80,000 psi. Moreover, it underwent only a weight loss of but 11 mg/cm This is deemed to be outstanding in terms of resistance to oxidation, particularly at the strength levels involved. Resistance to sulfidation, comparably speaking, was not as good as it might otherwise be since the alloy underwent a loss of approximately 80 mils during the period of test. By maintaining the total content of titanium plus tungsten over 7.75, e.g., about 8.25%, sulfidation resistance would be enhanced. This is reflected by Alloy B which showed a remarkably low loss less than 30 mils; however, its susceptibility to oxidation was on the high side, this in part being a reflection of high titanium. In contrast, Alloy C had excellent resistance to both oxidation and sulfidation attack in combination with good stress rupture properties. Over an exceptionally severe sulfidation test period of 300 hours, Alloy C corroded virtually completely with Alloy B still showing a loss of less than 30 mils.
As above-indicated, it is to advantage that the alloys be produced by mechanical alloying. In this connection and at least until recently, mechanical alloying was conducted in the presence of a dynamic atmosphere largely, if not completely, comprised of an oxygennitrogen mixture. However, such an environment has been found causative of certain problems in respect of both non-dispersion and dispersion strengthened alloys of the superalloy type. In this connection, and given the benefit of retrospective review, scant attention was given to the role of nitrogen in the composite particles produced, probably because the retained amounts thereof, being on the order of 0.l5-0.2% or so, were quite low (in contrast to oxygen) and were likely considered inconsequential. In any case and irrespective of what transpired heretofore, we have found that nitro gen, rather than being passive or innocuous, can exercise a most detracting influence.
The difficulty can be minimized by recourse to utilization of non-nitrogen atmospheres. This notwithstanding, nitrogen can nonetheless be introduced through the raw materials used, preprocessing procedures, the occurrence of leaks during the mechanical alloying process itself, etc. Moreover, and still important, nitrogen can lend to the efficiency of the mechanical alloying process. Thus, its specific contemplated use cannot be overlooked. But the point of concern is that it does 6 tageously not exceed 0.1% in mechanically alloyed" superalloys.
However, what we were unaware of (as is demonstrated herein) was that an otherwise small percentage of nitrogen, e.g., 0.15%, could subvert resistance to sulfidation. Furthermore, it now appears that by controlling the nitrogen content lower titanium and tungsten levels can be used for a sulfidation resistant alloy. This, in turn, offers the prospect of improving elevated stress-rupture strength.
The following description and data is given as illustrative of what can be accomplished in accordance herewith in terms of further improved sulfidation resistance.
A series of alloys were prepared (compositions given in Table 1V) by mechanical alloying using both elemental and master alloy powders placed in a 4 gallon attritor containing about 162-163 pounds of 5/ 16 inch diameter through hardened steel balls. The charges were processed for about 16% hours, the impeller speed of the attritor being maintained at about 288 rpm. During the course of the processing a dynamic atmosphere of air and nitrogen was supplied for three of the alloys, but the nitrogen was largely replaced by argon in each of the other alloys (argon 2%. 0 being used in two instances and argon plus 0.25% oxalic acid in the other, where the first percentage refers to gas volume and the second to the weight of the powder charge).
The coarsest of the powders (approx. 5%) was removed, the remainder being packed in 3 inch diameter mild steel cans, sealed, heated to 1950F. and then extruded using an appropriate lubricant. The alloys were then subjected to a gerrninative grain growth treatment (secondary recrystallization) generally consisting of heating for one half hour at 2250F. or 2300F. which was followed by aging at 1500F. for approximately 24 hours.
Each of the alloys was then subjected to a crucible sulfidation test involving partially immersing a 300 mil diameter specimen of each alloy in a Na SO, 10% NaCl salt solution, the test being conducted at 1700F. for a time period as given in Table IV. The alloys were also tested for cyclic oxidation and this involved an exposure to air at 1 C. for 500 hours, the alloys being cycled to room temperature every 24 hours.
TABLE IV sulfidation Oxidation Composition by Weight Time Loss Max loss Alloy Al Ti Ta Cr Mo W Zr B C Fe Y203 0, N (Hrs) (Mils) Attack Descaled (Mils) (mg/cm) D 3.7 2.3 2.0 14.0 4.0 4.0 .15 0.1 .074 1.6 1.1 .52 .14 100 300 300 10 E 3.5 23 2.0 14.0 4.0 188.8.131.52] .075 2.1 1.1 .76 .071 300 67 79 19 300 27 42 38 C 4.5 2.75 2.5 15.0 3.5 5.5 .13 .015 .069 1.6 1.1 .67 .17 100 21 28 13 Argon 2'1 0., "Argon (25% oxalic acid added to powder) not require much nitrogen to impair one or more alloy characteristics, for example, corrosion resistance. In accordance herewith, the nitrogen level should advan- With regard to the above data, Alloys D and E are substantially the same in terms of composition except for nitrogen content, the former having a nitrogen level twice that of the latter. Alloys C and F are also similar 7 compositionally except the respective percentages of nitrogen. Alloys G and H are also different largely by reason of molybdenum and tungsten contents.
In comparing Alloys D and E, low nitrogen Alloy E survived the severe 300-hour sulfidation exposure whereas Alloy D had already manifested virtually total disintigration upon an exposure of but 100 hours. While it is difficult to think that such a small difference in nitrogen would bee causative of such a marked disparity in results, Alloys C and F and even Alloys G and H rather confirm this phenomenon.
it is further noteworthy of mention that Alloy E withstood the 300-hour test notwithstanding that the alloy contained but 23% titanium and 4% tungsten. As indicated, above 2.4% titanium and 4.75% tungsten should be present in the alloys for optimum resistance to sulfidation. This is deemed beneficial for as also previously indicated, reduced titanium and tungsten levels would be expected to promote enhanced stress-rupture strength at the more elevated temperatures, such as 1900F.
With regard to the remarkably low sulfidation loss of Alloy No. H (3 to 4 mils), it is considered that this was due to the low molybdenum content in addition to the reduced percentage of nitrogen, the tungsten being but 4.2%.
The controlled use of low nitrogen levels, i.e., not greater than 0.1% and advantageously less than about 0.075%, is deemed applicable to not only the range of mechanically alloyed superalloys described herein, but also to such superalloys as those containing up to 65%, e.g., 2 to 35%, chromium; at least 1% of a hardening constituent from the group consisting of up to about or e.g., 0.5 to 8%, aluminum; up to about 10 or 15%, e.g., 0.5 to 8%, titanium, and up to 15 or e.g., 0.5 to 10%, columbium; up to e.g., 0.5 to 12 or 15%, molybdenum; up to 20 or 25%, e.g., up to 3%, tungsten; up to 20%, e.g., 1 to 10%, tantalum, up to 2 or 3% vanadium; up to 15%, e.g., up to 2 or 3%, manganese; up to l or 2%, e.g., up to 0.5 or 1%, carbon; up to l or 2%, e.g., up to 0.5%, silicon; up to 2%, e.g., 0.05 to 1%, zirconium; up to 1%, e.g., 0.001 to 0.1%, boron; up to 4%, e.g., 0.5 to 3%, hafnium; up to about 25 volume percent, e.g., 0.05 to 10% by volume, of a refractory dispersoid such as yttria, lanthana, thoria, etc.; and at least one metal from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and iron, preferably in an amount of at least 25 or Since nitrogen can have a positive processing effect, a nitrogen level of at least 0.001%, preferably at least 0.01%, and up to 0.075% is considered beneficial in such superalloy compositions.
The attributes of alloys within the invention are deemed all the more surprising from structural stability considerations. By way of explanation conventional wrought and cast superalloys are normally prone to sigma phase formation in respect of highly alloyed nickel-chromium base alloy compositions having an electron vacancy number, N,., equal to or greater than about 2.26 to 2.41. Sigma, of course, is rather synonymous with short term structural stability. Yet, alloys within the invention when mechanically alloyed have shown virtually no loss in room temperature ductility after being heat treated (aged) for 2000 hours at 1500F., this obtaining notwithstanding N, values ranging from 2,39 to 2.59. For example, Alloy C had an N,. number of 2.57, well above the 2.26-2.41 range. Metallographic examination did not reveal the presence of sigma. It is believed that mechanical alloying is largely, if not completely, responsible for this phenomenon.
It might be further added that despite the levels of oxidation and sulfidation resistance attainable in accordance herewith, the artisan may wish, as is not uncommon, to provide the alloys with a corrosion resistant coating of aluminum or an alloy containing aluminum and chromium. Even if this be the case, should the coating be ruptured or otherwise penetrated alloys of the instant invention are markedly capable of retarding further corrosion attack.
Although the invention has been described in con nection with preferred embodiments, modifications may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the art will readily understand. Such are considered within the purview and scope of the invention and appended claims.
1. A mechanically alloyed dispersion strengthenable, precipiation hardenable powder consisting essentially of about 13 to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance high temperature strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
2. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 characterized by a rnicrostructure having coarse elongated grains.
3. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing 13.25 to 16.25% chromium, 2.75 to 5.25% aluminum, 2 to 4.25% titanium, 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.5 to 2% yttria, up to 3% tantalum, up to about 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
4. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum and about 2 to 3% titanium, said alloy being characterized by a high degree of oxidation resistance at elevated temperature levels.
5. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 2.75 to about 4.6% aluminum and about 4.75 to about 6.25% tungsten, said alloy being characterized by good sulfidation resistance at elevated temperatures.
6. An alloy in accordance with claim 5 in which the sum of titanium plus tungsten is at least 7.75%.
7. An alloy in accordance with claim 6 in which the said sum is at least 8.5%.
8. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 13.75 to 16.25% chromium, about 3.5 to 5.25% aluminum, about 2.4 to about 3.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.25% molybdenum, about 4.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.05 to 0.175% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.022% boron, about 0.4 to 2% yttria, up to 0.125% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
9. An alloy in accordance with claim 8 containing 0.5 to 1.5% yttria and up to 3% tantalum.
10. An alloy made up of metallic powders consisting essentially of about 13% to 17% chromium, about 2.5 to 6% aluminum, about 2 to 4.25% titanium, about 1.75 to 4.5% molybdenum. about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.001 to 0.025% boron, about 0.2 to 2% yttria, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon. up to 10% cobalt. up to 3% 10 about 3.75 to 6.25% tungsten, about 0.02 to 0.5% zirconium, about 0.00l to 0.025% boron, yttria in a small but effective amount to enhance strength characteristics, up to 4% tantalum, up to 0.2% carbon and the balance essentially nickel.
12. An alloy in accordance with claim 11 in which the nitrogen does not exceed about 0.075%.
* t t I
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3591362 *||Mar 1, 1968||Jul 6, 1971||Int Nickel Co||Composite metal powder|
|US3728088 *||Aug 25, 1969||Apr 17, 1973||Int Nickel Co||Superalloys by powder metallurgy|
|US3778249 *||Jun 9, 1970||Dec 11, 1973||Int Nickel Co||Dispersion strengthened electrical heating alloys by powder metallurgy|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4101713 *||Jan 14, 1977||Jul 18, 1978||General Electric Company||Flame spray oxidation and corrosion resistant superalloys|
|US4386976 *||Jun 26, 1980||Jun 7, 1983||Inco Research & Development Center, Inc.||Dispersion-strengthened nickel-base alloy|
|US4579587 *||Jan 28, 1985||Apr 1, 1986||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Method for producing high strength metal-ceramic composition|
|US4627959 *||Jun 18, 1985||Dec 9, 1986||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Production of mechanically alloyed powder|
|US4668312 *||Mar 13, 1985||May 26, 1987||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Turbine blade superalloy I|
|US4717435 *||Sep 3, 1986||Jan 5, 1988||National Research Institute For Metals||Gamma-prime precipitation hardening nickel-base yttria particle-dispersion-strengthened superalloy|
|US4731117 *||Nov 4, 1986||Mar 15, 1988||Crucible Materials Corporation||Nickel-base powder metallurgy alloy|
|US4781772 *||Feb 22, 1988||Nov 1, 1988||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||ODS alloy having intermediate high temperature strength|
|US4836849 *||Apr 30, 1987||Jun 6, 1989||Westinghouse Electric Corp.||Oxidation resistant niobium alloy|
|US5002834 *||Apr 1, 1988||Mar 26, 1991||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Oxidation resistant alloy|
|US5322666 *||Mar 24, 1992||Jun 21, 1994||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Mechanical alloying method of titanium-base metals by use of a tin process control agent|
|US5427601 *||Sep 30, 1991||Jun 27, 1995||Ngk Insulators, Ltd.||Sintered metal bodies and manufacturing method therefor|
|US7235118||Apr 16, 2003||Jun 26, 2007||National Research Council Of Canada||Process for agglomeration and densification of nanometer sized particles|
|US7405454||Aug 26, 2005||Jul 29, 2008||Micron Technology, Inc.||Electronic apparatus with deposited dielectric layers|
|US7446368||Feb 9, 2007||Nov 4, 2008||Micron Technology, Inc.||Deposition of metal oxide and/or low asymmetrical tunnel barrier interpoly insulators|
|US7476925||Feb 20, 2002||Jan 13, 2009||Micron Technology, Inc.||Atomic layer deposition of metal oxide and/or low asymmetrical tunnel barrier interploy insulators|
|US7481970 *||May 23, 2005||Jan 27, 2009||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Heat resistant alloy for use as material of engine valve|
|US7560793||Aug 30, 2004||Jul 14, 2009||Micron Technology, Inc.||Atomic layer deposition and conversion|
|US7572695||May 27, 2005||Aug 11, 2009||Micron Technology, Inc.||Hafnium titanium oxide films|
|US7589029||May 2, 2002||Sep 15, 2009||Micron Technology, Inc.||Atomic layer deposition and conversion|
|US7700989||Dec 1, 2006||Apr 20, 2010||Micron Technology, Inc.||Hafnium titanium oxide films|
|US8501563||Sep 13, 2012||Aug 6, 2013||Micron Technology, Inc.||Devices with nanocrystals and methods of formation|
|US8921914||Aug 5, 2013||Dec 30, 2014||Micron Technology, Inc.||Devices with nanocrystals and methods of formation|
|US20040208775 *||Apr 16, 2003||Oct 21, 2004||National Research Council Of Canada||Process for agglomeration and densification of nanometer sized particles|
|US20050265887 *||May 23, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Heat resistant alloy for use as material of engine valve|
|EP0194683A1 *||Mar 13, 1986||Sep 17, 1986||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase|
|EP0196513A1 *||Mar 13, 1986||Oct 8, 1986||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Nickel-chromium alloys having a dispersed phase|
|EP0197347A1 *||Mar 13, 1986||Oct 15, 1986||Inco Alloys International, Inc.||Nickel-chromium alloy having a dispersed phase|
|EP0260465A1 *||Aug 19, 1987||Mar 23, 1988||BBC Brown Boveri AG||Oxide dispersion-strengthened nickel-base superalloy with improved corrosion resistance|
|EP0831235A2 *||May 2, 1994||Mar 25, 1998||Daido Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha||High-temperature gas blower impeller with vanes made of dispersion-strengthened alloy, gas blower using such impeller, and gas circulating furnace equipped with such gas blower|
|WO2015020007A1||Aug 4, 2014||Feb 12, 2015||National Institute For Materials Science||Ni-group superalloy strengthened by oxide-particle dispersion|
|U.S. Classification||75/230, 75/956, 148/428, 148/410, 420/448, 75/356, 75/246|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S75/956, C22C32/0026|