|Publication number||US3932319 A|
|Application number||US 05/488,494|
|Publication date||Jan 13, 1976|
|Filing date||Jul 15, 1974|
|Priority date||Jul 28, 1972|
|Publication number||05488494, 488494, US 3932319 A, US 3932319A, US-A-3932319, US3932319 A, US3932319A|
|Inventors||Robert A. Clendinning, James E. Potts, Walter D. Niegisch|
|Original Assignee||Union Carbide Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (83), Classifications (34), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a division of application Ser. No. 275,973 filed July 28, 1972, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,850,862.
This invention relates to novel blends comprising biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer such as poly(ethylene adipate) and other components such as naturally occurring biodegradable product, e.g., tree bark; to the novel shaped articles fabricated therefrom as exemplified by mulch films, transplanter containers, disposable containers, shipping crates and boxes, and the like; and to transplanter containers which possess a germination medium, and optionally, a seed or seedling in such medium.
Agricultural mulches are used to cover the soil about crops or other plantings in order to prevent or retard weed growth and to increase soil water retention and temperature. For many years, various naturally occurring materials have been used for this purpose such as peat moss, wood chips, chopped bark, sawdust, etc. However, repeated rainfalls tend to wash away such natural mulches leaving void and barren areas in the field. More recently, polyethylene film, both in its transparent state and its opaque state, has been found to be a useful mulch. When its presence on the ground is no longer desired, the film is physically removed from the fields. The necessity of such removal increases costs and complicates post harvest field preparation. Currently, the film is collected and burned. Obviously, it would be more desirable if the use of synthetic mulches more closely conformed to the practice with natural mulches. These natural mulches are not removed from the ground, but rather are turned back into the soil upon plowing at the start of the next growing season. Such factors undoubtedly led to the recent development of photodegradable or light degradable polyethylene film mulches. Various additives and ultraviolet light absorbers are compounded into the polyethylene thereby rendering this polymer photodegradable. The cost disadvantages incurred by adding and compounding such ingredients in polyethylene are obvious.
In the seed and nursery industries, it is the practice of he horticulturist to plant seeds or seedlings in soil or conditioned material which is contained in relatively small containers, such as metal cans or clay pots, so that initial growth may be carefully controlled under greenhouse or other desirable conditions. During such growth, the root system of the plant develops and becomes established within the soil or other material in the container. The use of metal, clay or other similar types of containers is generally satisfactory during the initial growth period. A major drawback of such containers is that the plant must be entirely removed from the container when it is to be transplanted to the field or to a larger container. Since the root system has developed within the soil or material in which growth was started, the roots are firmly embedded and intertwined with such soil and removal from the container of the plant and the soil in which the roots are established disturbs the root system anad results in damage thereto. It would be advantageous, therefore, if such containers were fabricated from materials comprising biodegradable substances in which the container possessed the capability of maintaining its shape during the initial growth period of a plant and, after transplanting the container and its contents to the field, it possessed the capability of biodegrading and disintegrating.
In the regeneration of forests it is the practice of the silviculturist to employ, for the most part, bare-root planting methods. Though it is estimated that well over one billion bare-root tree seedlings are planted annually in North America, the bare-root planting method is fraught with disadvantages. A formidable obstacle to the silviculturist is the rapidity of physical deterioration of the bare-root stock. Reforestration is also beset with labor problems, antiquated tools, and dated concepts of planting. The silviculturist has very recently turned to experimenting with container planting methods. In this regard, new shapes and types of containers and accessory equipment for growing and planting seedlings have been devised. One method involves the mechanical metering of containerized seedlings into the terrain. The equipment utilized is a "planting gun" in which the container, in the shape of a "bullet," is placed into the planting gun, passed through the gun muzzle, and then mechanically inserted into the ground. The bullet can be fabricated from material such as polystyrene and is quite rigid in construction. To permit root egress of the seedling from such bullet to the surrounding soil after planting, the walls of the bullet can be weakened by strategically located grooves, splits, and/or holes. Unfortunately, there are drawbacks to the transplanter container method briefly described above. The plastic container or bullet is not biodegradable, that is, it is not consumed or substantially consumed by the action of microorganisms such as fungi or bacteria. Not only does this non-biodegradability factor represent an ecological problem, but also interference of the root system by the container wall results in damage and stunted growth of the seedling.
The literal inundation of our lands in recent years with plastic and plastic-like packaging material and shipping containers in the form of discarded film, boxes, crates, wrappings, etc., has received wide attention during the last decade. One approach towards a partial solution to this litter and disposal problem has been the incorporation of various additives into plastics to make them photodegradable. This approach, though of limited applicability, has merit and will probably gain, in the coming years, support from citizen-minded and nature-loving groups. Other approaches and alternatives, obviously, are being investigated.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide novel biodegradable blends comprising biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer and other components such as naturally occurring biodegradable product. It is also an object of the invention to provide novel blends from materials comprising biodegradable substances, said blends having the capability of being fabricated into articles of commerce, e.g., boxes, crates, packing material, and the like. Another object of the invention is to provide novel shaped biodegradable articles in the form of film, disposable containers, transplanter containers, shipping containers, storage containers, packaging material, toys, and the like. A further object is to provide an improved transplanter container fabricated from materials comprising biodegradable substances, said container having the capability of maintaining its shape during the initial growth period of a plant whereby the entire container and its contents can be transplanted by hand or mechanical means, to the field or to a larger container without disturbing or damaging the root system. A still further object is to provide a novel biodegradable transplanter container which has sufficient strength to contain the soil in which the seed or seedling is planted, which has the capability of disintegrating when planted in the field, and which upon disintegration possesses the quality of acting as a soil conditioner whereby plant growth is encouraged and improved. A particular object is to provide an improved transplanter container constructed of materials which has the property of holding its shape in a moist and/or humid environment. A yet further object of the invention is to provide a novel agricultural mulch from material comprising biodegradable thermoplastic oxyalkanoyl polymer. Another object of the invention is to provide improved methods utilizing biodegradable mulches and transplanter containers. Still another object of the invention is to provide a novel article of manufacture comprising a biodegradable thermoplastic container, a germination medium, and a seed or seedling therein, said container having the capability of maintaining its shape during the initial growth period of a plant whereby the entire container and its contents can be transplanted, by hand or mechanical means, to the field or to a larger container without disturbing or damaging the root system. At least one of the aforesaid objects and other objects will become apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the specification.
A broad aspect of the invention is directed to novel blends or mixtures comprising biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer and other components such as naturally occurring biodegradable product. The naturally occurring biodegradable products which are suitable in the practice of preferred embodiments of the invention are derived from or are a part of plant or animal species, especially those products which have not been chemically modified by man. Cellulosic esters and cellulosic ethers are substances which have been so modified. Strictly speaking, biodegradable materials are those which, because of their chemical structure are susceptible to being assimilated by microorganisms such as molds, fungi, and bacteria, when buried in the ground or otherwise contacted with the organisms under conditions conductive to their growth. The term "biodegradable" is often used indiscriminately to refer to various types of environmental degradation, including photodegradation. Though a polymeric material may be degraded by sunlight and oxygen this does not necessarily mean that such material will also be assimilated by microorganisms. The term "biodegradable," as used herein, is reserved for that type of degradability which is brought about by living organisms, usually microorganisms.
The naturally occurring biodegradable products which are suitable in the practice of the invention include, by way of illustrations, sugar cane residue, sugar beet residue, peat moss, sawdust, hemp, sisal, linen, corn starch, cotton, rice hulls, wheat bran, soybean meal, potato starch, corn syrup, rice flour, gelatin, barley flour, rye flour, granulated sugar, wheat flour, wood chips, brewers yeast, vegetable gum, egg albumin, carboard, disintegrated or shredded tree bark especially Douglas Fir bark and Pine bark, cotton seed hulls, manure, disintegrated paper stock, shredded wood, hulled and coarsely ground as well as finely ground grain, and the like.
The thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers which are suitable in the practice of the invention possess a reduced viscosity value of at least about 0.1 and upwards to about 10, and higher. In various desirable embodiments thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers which have a wide span of usefulness are those which possess a reduced viscosity value in the range of from about 0.2 to about 5. These polymers are further characterized in that they contain at least about 10 weight percent recurring linear dialkanoyl-containing unit of the formula: ##EQU1## wherein R represents a divalent aliphatic hydrocarbon radical desirably a C1 -C12 alkylene and C2 -C12 alkylidene, e.g., methylene,, ethylene, propylene, tetramethylene, heptamethylene, octamethylene, decamethylene, ethylidene, propylidene, octylidene, etc.; and wherein R' represents a divalent aliphatic hydrocarbon radical as described above or a divalent aliphatic oxa-hydrocarbon radical desirably of the formula -C2 -C12 alkylene(oxyC2 -C12 alkylene)x.
The aforesaid recurring linear unit is interconnected through the oxy group (--O--) of one unit with a carbonyl group ##EQU2## of a second unit. In addition to the recurring linear unit above, the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer may comprise other moieties or groups therein especially those which intersperse or terminate the polymeric chain thereof as illustrated by the ##EQU3## group; the urethane group, ##EQU4## the ##EQU5## group; the ##EQU6## group; the biuret group, ##EQU7## the divalent mono- and polyaromatic rings including fused and bridged rings; lower alkyl substituted oxyalkanoyl groups; catalyst residue; the carbonate group, ##EQU8## and others. In the above illustrated groups, R1 desirably is hydrogen or methyl; x represents an integer which has a value of at least one, e.g., from 1 to 4; and R has the aforesaid meaning.
As previously noted, the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers which are suitable in the practice of the invention are expressed in terms of their reduced viscosity values. As is well known in the art, reduced viscosity value is a measure or indication of the molecular weight of polymers. The expression "reduced viscosity" is a value obtained by dividing the specific viscosity by the concentration of polymer in the solution, the concentration being measured in grams of polymer per 100 milliliters of solvent. The specific viscosity is obtained by dividing the difference between the viscosity of the solution and the viscosity of the solvent by the viscosity of the solvent. Unless otherwise noted, the reduced viscosity values herein referred to are measured at a concentration of 0.2 gram of polymer in 100 milliliters of benzene (benzene is preferred although cyclohexanone, chloroform, toluene or other common organic solvent for the polymer may be used) at 30°C.
The thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers can be prepared by known methods. A general procedure for the preparation of poly(alkylene alkanedioate) glycols (or dicarboxy compounds) involves well-documented esterification techniques using predetermined amounts of an aliphatic diol and an alkanedioic acid. A molar excess of the diol results in dihydroxyl-terminated polymers whereas the use of a molar excess of the dicarboxylic acid gives dicarboxyl-terminated polymers. In general, the alkylene alkanedioate polymers are suitably obtained under reaction conditions of the order of 250°C., and higher, using low pressures, e.g., less than one mm. of Hg. Water of condensation is removed from the reaction zone by conventional equipment suitably for such purposes. Illustrative of the aliphatic glycols which can be employed are ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, 1,4-butanediol, 1,3-butylene glycol, 1,5-pentanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 1,8-octanediol, 1,4-cyclohexane-diol, 1,12-dodecanediol, and the like. Desirably, the aliphatic glycol contains from 2 to 8 carbon atoms. Illustrative alkanedioic acid reactants include malonic acid, succinic acid, glutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, dodecanedioic acid, and the like. Desirably, the alkanedioic acid contains from 2 to 12 carbon atoms. Mixtures of the aforesaid aliphatic glycols and/or alkanedioic acids can be employed. In addition, the reaction mixture can comprise small amounts of hydroxyalkanoic acid, vicinal-epoxy compounds, cyclic ethers, cyclic carbonates, etc., e.g., 6-hydroxycaproic acid, ethylene oxide, tetrahydrofuran, tetramethylene carbonate, and the like, as well as the glycol and diacid reactants. Higher molecular weight themoplastic alkylene alkanedioate polymers can be prepared by following the teachings in the prior art, e.g., note U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,423,823 and 2,071,250. The polyesterification reaction, as typified above, is effected under extremely low pressure, e.g., less than about 10- 3 mm. of Hg using equimolor quantities of diol and diacid.
The alkylene alkanedioate polymers which have number average molecular weights of, for example, less than about 25,000 can be characterized by hydroxyl end-groups or carboxyl end-groups. If desired, these polymers can be reacted with a diisocyanate, e.g., 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate, 2,4- and/or or 2,6-tolylene diisocyanate, bis(4-isocyanatophenyl)methane, bis(4-isocyanatocylohexyl)methane, etc., to extend the polymeric chain thereof, or such hydroxyl-terminated polymers or carboxyl-terminated polymers as well as their polyurethane extension products can be reacted with so-called "chain stoppers" such as a monocarboxylic acid or anhydride, or a monohydric compound such as an alkanol.
Illustrative of other components which can be admixed or combined with the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers to form novel blends which have a wide variety of usefulness include plastic additives such as the normally-solid condensation and addition polymers which are produced during the polymerization process without the evolution of low-molecular weight by-products as well as those which are produced during the polymerization process with the evolution of low molecular weight by-products, e.g., water, alcohol, hydrogen chloride, etc., as illustrated by the polyimides, the polyureas, the polyurethanes, the polyureides, the polyanhydrides, the polyethers, the polyalkenes, the polylactams, the polycarbonates, the nitrile rubber gum stocks, the polybutadiene rubber gumstocks, the styrene/butadiene rubber gumstocks, the phenolic resins, the epoxy resins, the melamine resins, the aminoplasts, the alkenes, and the like. It should be understood that the term "polymer," as used herein, is employed in its generic sense to include homopolymers and copolymers.
Typical polymers useful as plastic additives include the poly(hydroxy ether)polymers which are formed by the polymerization of aliphatic and aromatic polyhydroxy compounds, e.g., alcohols and phenols, with an epihalohydrin. Another class of polymers is the thermoplastic polycarbonates which are derived from dihydroxy compounds or phenols and phosgene. Another class of polymers is the polyamides, such as nylon 6, e.g., polycaprolactam; nylon 6/6, e.g., hexaamethylenediamine-adipic acid or anhydride polycondensate; nylon 6/10, e.g., hexamethylene diaminesebacic acid or anhydride polycondensate; nylon 11, e.g., 11-aminoundecanoic acid polycondensate; and the like. Yet another class is the normally-solid polyoxyalkylene polymers, both unsubstituted and halogenated. The lowest homologous type of this class is the polyoxymethylene polymers, otherwise called acetal resins. In addition, the normally-solid polyoxyethylene, polyoxypropylene, and polyoxybutylene polymers and copolymeric forms such as the poly(oxyethyleneoxypropylene) copolymers, the poly(oxymethyleneoxyethylene) copolymers, and the poly(oxymethyleneoxypropylene) copolymers which have a block or random distribution can be employed as an additive thermoplastic component. Illustrative of the thermoplastic polyurethanes include those which are formed from the toluene diisocyanates (TDI) or diphenylmethane 4,4-diisocyanate (MDI) and a wide range of polyols such as polyoxyethylene glycol, polyoxypropylene glycol, polyoxyethyleneoxypropylene glycols, etc. Polyureas which are suitable include thermoplastic solids having recurring units of the formula: [NHR"NHCONHR"NHCO] wherein R" is alkylene or arylene having 2 to 12 carbon atoms. Illustrative of the normally-solid addition polymers include those prepared via the vinyl polymerization of olefinically unsaturated monomers, e.g., monomers having the group >C=C<, such as ethylene, propylene, the butylenes, styrene, vinyl acetate, fumaric acid, ethyl acrylate, mixtures thereof, and the like. The polymers include, for example, the various normally-solid alkene homopolymers and copolymers such as the high and low density polyethylenes, the polypropylenes, and polybutylenes, the polystyrenes, and the like.
Still other components which can be admixed or combined with the biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer include fibrous and nonfibrous fillers, kaolin, bentonite, iron oxide, clay, carbon black, lamp black, silica, titanium dioxide, asbestos, vermiculite, metallic powders, calcium carbonate, calcium sulfate, powdered glass, mica, and the like. The filler, if employed, is desirably in particulate form or of small particle size. Particulate polymers are desirably kept in particulate form during processing and fabricating by remaining below the melting point of the particulate polymer or by crosslinking the particulate polymer either chemically or by radiation treatment known in the art.
Though biodegradability of the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer is oftentimes manifest when at least about 10 weight percent of its weight is attributable to dialkanoyl units, especially diadipoyl units, it is desirable that the novel blends, and articles therefrom, comprise thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer in which at least about 20 weight percent of the weight of such polymer is in the form of dialkanoyl units. In specific aspects of the invention, it is preferred that such polymer contain at least about 50 weight percent, and preferably still at least about 80 weight percent, and upwards to about 100 weight percent of dialkanoyl units therein.
The proportions of the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer and other components, e.g., naturally occurring biodegradable product, plastic additive, filler, etc., in the novel blends can vary over a wide range. The optimum composition of the blend will depend, to a significant extent, upon a consideration of factors such as the end-use contemplated; the characteristics or properties desired in the article of manufacture made from the blend, e.g., mechanical strength properties, rate and degree of biodegradability, etc.; the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer of choice; the choice of the naturally occurring biodegradable product of choice, plastic additive, and/or filler; the concentrations of such components; and the like.
Broadly, the novel blends of the invention comprise from about 5 to about 95 weight percent of thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer and from about 95 to about 5 weight percent of the other component(s), based on the total weight of the blend. In various desirable embodiments which take into consideration various factors as illustrated above, the novel blends comprise from about 10 to 90 weight percent, preferably from about 20 to about 80 weight percent, of thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer; and from about 10 to about 90 weight percent, preferably from about 20 to about 80 weight percent, of the other component, e.g., naturally occurring biodegradable product; based on the total weight of the blend. The novel blend can be comprised of two or more ingredients. For example, the novel blend can comprise one or more thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymers, naturally occurring biodegradable products, plastic additives, and/or fillers.
Suitable equipment for fluxing the novel blend comprising thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer include Banbury mixers, screw extruders, two-roll or multi-roll mills, ribbon or paddle blendors, calenders, and the like. The time of blending or fluxing is not narrowly critical. The blending time should be sufficient to obtain a substantially uniform mixture.
In various aspects of the invention the novel blends are useful in the preparation of novel biodegradable articles of manufacture such as mulch film, disposable containers, shipping containers, storage containers, packaging material, transplanter containers, and the like. Well-known techniques in the art can be used to fabricate these novel articles and they include, for instance, compression molding, injection molding, transfer molding, extrusion, vaccum forming, blow molding, calendering, rotational molding, coating, dipping, and the like.
Novel articles of manufacture, e.g., mulch film and transplanter containers, which have "tailor-made" or "built-in" properties or characteristics can be fabricated from the novel blends. Thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymerrs as exemplified by poly(1,6-hexamethylene adipate) are capable of accepting high loadings of material in particulate form (fillers such as carbon black, talc, etc.; plastic additives such as polyethylene, polystyrene, etc; naturally occurring biodegradable products such as wood flour, finely ground grain, etc.) thus increasing the stiffness or modulus of articles fabricated from such "filled" polymers. Moreover, the cost of such articles has been reduced markedly. The addition of rubbery material such as natural rubber to the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer can increase the impact strength and/or elongation characteristics of articles fabricated therefrom. Transplanter containers and mulch film fabricated from mixtures comprising biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer and water-soluble polymers, e.g. wax-like and solid water-soluble ethylene oxide homopolymers and copolymers, have the ability to undergo relatively slow dissolution or leaching in an aqueous or humid surrounding to thus provide a more favorable environment for growth of fungi. Additional ingredients which can be included in the novel blends are plant nutrients, fertilizer, insecticides, pesticides, herbicides, and the like. One can also use plasticizers, dyes, etc., in the novel blends to further modify the characteristics of the novel articles therefrom.
In the practice of various embodiments of the invention it is desirable that the novel articles of manufacture possess properties and characteristics which are suitable for the application contemplated. For instance, if the novel articles are to be used in mechanical transplantation methods or as shipping containers, e.g., boxes, crates, etc., it is highly desirable that such articles have sufficient strength properties to withstand breakdown or failure during use. By way of illustration, one can use, if desired, containers which are characterized by a modulus range of from about 10,000 psi, and lower, to about 1,000,000 psi (as determined by ASTM Method D-638). On the other hand, containers characterized by a much lower modulus can be tolerated in hand planting techniques, e.g., at least about 300 psi. It is to be understood that the aforementioned values are merely illustrative and that higher and lower values are contemplated as being within the scope of the invention.
One aspect of the invention is directed to novel transplanter containers, fabricated from the novel blends, and optionally, a germination medium in said containers with/without a seed or seedling in such medium. The container can be of any size and shape capable of having utility in horticultural, silvicultural, and agricultural applications. It can be in the form of a flower pot, cone, bullet, tube, cylinder, tray, etc. It should be capable of holding the germination medium therein. In this connection additional support or reinforcement material can be used. For instance, a container shaped in the form of a hollowed tube, opened at both extremities, may not be suitable in holding the germination medium in its interior. This drawbaack can be overcomed by stoppering one end of such tube with suitable plugging means, if necessary. The germination medium can be any mixture suitable for growing plant life such as farm products, flowers, shrubs, trees, grass, etc. The germination medium can be formed from synthetic materials, substances found in nature, or mixtures of both. A desirable germination medium comprises soil formed from disintegrated and decomposed rocks and minerals generally mixed with organic matter in various stages of decay, and having substantial porosity or pore space. The pore space will vary with the texture of the soil. The soil may comprise silt, sand, clay, stone, gravel, minerals, organic matter, etc. Conditioners and stabilizers can be added to or contained in coil and they include, for example, gypsum, calcium chloride, limestone, vermiculite, iron sulfate, water-soluble high molecular weight polymeric electrolytes, and others. Nutrients can be added to the soil to aid plant growth and to supplement the plant-food content thereof. The more important ones include the compounds of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium. Trace elements such as magnesium, iron, zinc, copper, etc., have been shown to be beneficial to plant growth and can be added to the soil. Various types of fertilizers provide useful nutrients. They can range from inorganic compounds as illustrated by ammonium nitrate types to organic compounds such as the long lasting urea forms which release the nitrogen slowly.
Any type of seed or seedling capable of growing in soil in contemplated. Of special interest are tree seeds and seedlings as illustrated by the deciduous and coniferous types such as oak, ash, maple, elm, Douglas Fir, pine, spruce, cedar, etc., shrub seedlings as illustrated by ornamental or evergreen types such as taxus, holly, juniper, etc.; plants and flowers of the various well-known varieties; and the like.
By the terms "biodegradable" and "biodegradability," as used herein, are meant that the novel blends and articles therefrom are capable of being consumed by microorganisms as, for example, bacteria or fungi, in an environment suitable to the growth of microorganisms such that there results a weight loss of at least approximately 20 weight percent in the biodegradable thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer component in such blend or article within a period of about four years, and generally within about two years. The degree and rate of biodegradability depend, to an extent, on the weight percent content of the unit, ##EQU9## contained in the thermoplastic dialkanoyl polymer used in the fabrication of the container, the nature of the other component(s), e.g., plastic additive, naturally occurring biodegradable additive, filler, plasticizer, etc. By way of illustration, transplanter containers which are fabricated from poly(1,6-hexamethylene adipate), Ir of about 0.6, and peat moss, and which are subjected to soil burial tests, evidence weight losses upwards to about 50 weight percent, and higher, within a one year period due to container disintegration and container consumption by microorganisms.
In the illustrative Examples hereinafter disclosed, numerical references in the copolymer or blend designate parts by weight. For example, 67 ethylene/33 vinyl acetate refers to a copolymer containing 67 parts by weight of ethylene and 33 parts by weight of vinyl acetate chemically combined therein.
In Examples 1-24 infra, samples of commercially available high molecular weight polymers were pressed or molded into plaques from which test specimens were cut. These specimens were tested for degradation by fungi using ASTM - D-1924-63.sup.(1). This procedure requires the placement of test specimens in or on a solid agar growth medium that is deficient only in carbon. The medium and specimens are inoculated with the test microorganisms and incubated for 3 weeks. Any growth which may occur is dependent on the utilization of a component of the specimen as a carbon source by the test organism. The test fungi consisted of a mixture of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Chaetomium globosum, and Penicillium funiculosum. Since possible complication that growth may occur as a result of the presence of additives in the polymeric specimen, it was necessary that the polymeric specimen tested be free from stabilizers, plasticizers, lubricants, and other extraneous organic substances, or that the presence of such additives be recognized. If a pure polymeric specimen showed heavy growth and concurrent loss of weight and mechanical properties this was considered good evidence of its biodegradability.
After various exposure times up to three weeks, and longer, the samples were examined and assigned growth ratings as shown below:
0 = No Growth
1 = Traces (Less than 10 percent Covered)
2 = Light Growth (10 to 30 percent Covered)
3 = Medium Growth (30 to 60 percent Covered)
4 = Heavy Growth (60 to 100 percent Covered)
The pertinent data are set out in Table I below.
TABLE I______________________________________Sample Commercial GrowthNo. Thermoplastic Rating______________________________________1 Acrylonitrile/Butadiene/Styrene Terpolymer (ABS) .sup.(a) 02 Blend of ABS and Poly(Bisphenol A Carbonate) .sup.(b) 03 Butadiene/Acrylonitrile Rubber .sup.(c) 04 72/Styrene/28 Acrylonitrile Copolymer 05 Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) .sup.(d) 06 Poly(Ethylene Terephthalate) .sup.(e) 07 Poly(Cyclohexanedimethanol Tere- phthalate) .sup.(f) 08 Poly(Bisphenol A Carbonate) .sup.(g) 09 Poly(4-Methyl-1-Pentene) 010 Polyisobutylene .sup.(h) 011 Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene .sup.(i) 012 Cellulose Acetate .sup.(j) 013 Cellulose Butyrate .sup.(k) 014 Nylon-6; Nylon-6/6; Nylon-12 015 Poly(Vinyl Butyral) 016 Polyformaldehyde .sup.(l) 017 Poly(Vinyl Ethyl Ether); Ir =4 018 Poly(Vinyl Acetate); Ir =0.8 119 Poly(Vinyl Acetate), 50% Hydrolyzed to Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) 120 High Density Polyethylene, 31,600 M.W. 021 High Density Polyethylene, 52,500 M.W. 022 High Density Polyethylene, 97,300 M.W. 123 Low Density Polyethylene, 21,000 M.W. 124 Low Density Polyethylene, 28,000 M.W. 0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Kralastic K2938 by Uniroyal, Inc. .sup.(b) Cycoloy by Borg Warner Corp. .sup.(c) Hycar 1002 by B. F. Goodrich Co. .sup.(d) Lucite by E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. .sup.(e) Arnite by Polychem AKU-GE, Holland .sup.(f) Kodel by Eastman Kodak Co. .sup.(g) Lexan 101 by General Electric Co. .sup.(h) Vistanex by I. G. Farben .sup.(i) Hypalon (29% Cl) by E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co. .sup.(j) Tenite (036A3719748) by Eastman Kodak Co. .sup.(k) Tenite (233A22300H2) by Eastman Kodak Co. .sup.(l) Celcon by Celanese Corp.
Various high molecular weight thermoplastic ethylene copolymers were tested for biodegradability in the manner set out in Examples 1-24 supra. The pertinent data are noted in Table II below.
TABLE II______________________________________Sample GrowthNo. Ethylene Copolymer Rating______________________________________25 67 Ethylene/33 Vinyl Acetate 126 55 Ethylene/45 Vinyl Acetate 127 85 Ethylene/15 Acrylic Acid 028 82 Ethylene/18 Ethyl Acrylate 0______________________________________
Several relatively low molecular weight thermoplastic copolymers of ethylene and different vegetable oils were tested for biodegradability in the manner set out in Examples 1-24 supra. These copolymers were carefully purified before testing to remove unreacted vegetable oil. The pertinent data are noted in Table III below.
TABLE III______________________________________Sample Ethylene/Vegetable Oil GrowthNo. Copolymer Rating______________________________________29 74 Ethylene/26 Castor Oil 030 72 Ethylene/28 Linseed Oil 031 73 Ethylene/27 Safflower Oil 032 73 Ethylene/27 Soybean Oil 033 59 Ethylene/41 Neat Foot Oil 034 80 Ethylene/20 Peanut Oil 035 81 Ethylene/19 Rapeseed Oil 036 84 Ethylene/16 Olive Oil 037 82 Ethylene/18 Corn Oil 038 91 Ethylene/9 Oleic Acid 0______________________________________
Since high molecular weight thermoplastic polystyrene evidenced a Growth Rating of zero, various high molecular weight thermoplastic copolymers of styrene were prepared and tested in the manner indicated in Examples 1-24 supra. As seen in Table IV below, thermoplastic copolymers of styrene and one or more comonomers such as acrylic acid, sodium acrylate, ethyl acrylate, dibutyl maleate, and dimethyl itaconate, were resistant to attack by the microorganisms. The pertinent data are noted in Table IV infra.
TABLE IV______________________________________Sample Reduced GrowthNo. Copolymer Viscosity Rating______________________________________39 84 Styrene/16 Acrylic Acid 0.9.sup.(a) 040 84 Styrene/16 Sodium Acrylate -- 041 85 Styrene/10 Acrylic Acid/ 5 Dibutyl Maleate 0.5.sup.(a) 042 85 Styrene/10 Acrylic Acid/ 5 Dimethyl Itaconate 0.5.sup.(a) 043 70 Styrene/30 Dimethyl Itaconate 0.3.sup.(a) 044 50 Styrene/50 Ethyl Acrylate 0.6.sup.(b) 045 85 Styrene/15 Bis(2-Ethyl- hexyl) Fumarate 0.5.sup.(c) 046 85 Styrene/15 Dodecyl Acrylate 0.4.sup.(a) 047 85 Styrene/10 Ethyl Acrylate/ 5 Dodecyl Acrylate 0.4.sup.(a) 0______________________________________ .sup.(a) Measured in dimethylformamide, 0.2 g/100 ml at 30°C. .sup.(b) Measured in acetone, 0.2 g/100 ml at 30°C. .sup.(c) Measured in benzene, 0.2 g/100 ml at 30°C.
Various polymers were tested for biodigradability in the manner indicated in Examples 1-24 supra. The results are documented in Table V below.
TABLE V______________________________________Sample Reduced GrowthNo. Polymer Viscosity Rating______________________________________48 Poly(Ethylene high 0 terephthalate)49 Poly(Cyclohexanedi- high 0 methanol Terephthalate)50 Poly(Ethylene Succinate) 0.2 451 Poly(Tetramethylene 0.6 1 Succinate)52 Poly(Tetramethylene 0.1 4 Succinate)53 Poly(Hexamethylene 0.9 4 Succinate)54 Poly(Ethylene Adipate) 0.1 4______________________________________
Thermoplastic poly(hexamethylene succinate), reduced viscosity of about 0.9, is chosen for biodegradation testing by the soil burial technique. By injection molding techniques, this polymer is molded into tensile bars measuring approximately 6 inches × 0.5 inch × 0.13 inch. Various tensile bars are buried in a mixture of equal parts of New Jersey garden soil, Michigan peat moss, and builders sand. After 12 months the bars are removed from the soil. Visual examination shows substantial pitting, erosion, and disintegration of the bars.
Thermoplastic poly(ethylene adipate) reduced viscosity of about 0.5, is chosen for biodegradation testing by the soil burial technique. By injection molding techniques, this polymer is molded into tensile bars measuring approximately 6 inches × 0.5 inch × 0.13 inch. Various tensile bars are buried in a mixture of equal parts of New Jersey garden soil, Michigan peat moss, and builders sand. After 12 months the bars are removed from the soil. Visual examination shows substantial pitting, erosion, and disintegration of the bars.
Thermoplastic poly(tetramethylene adipate), reduced viscosity of about 0.5, is chosen for biodegradation testing by the soil burial technique. By injection molding techniques, this polymer is molded into tensile bars measuring approximately 6 inches × 0.5 inch × 0.13 inch. Various tensile bars are buried in a mixture of equal parts of New Jersey garden soil, Michigan peat moss, and builders sand. After 12 months the bars are removed from the soil. Visual examination shows substantial pitting, erosion, and disintegration of the bars.
In lieu of forming tensile bars, the polymers of Examples 55-56 are molded into containers shaped similar to small flower pots or whisky jiggers. The soil burial tests are then repeated. After 12 months the containers are removed. Visual examination shows a high degree of pitting, erosion, and disintegration as well as weight loss in the containers.
Three thermoplastic polyester polyurethanes are molded into containers shaped similar to small flower pots. Each of the polyurethanes are prepared by reacting equimolar amounts of bis(4-isocyanatophenyl) methane and different polyester diols of about 2,000 number average molecular weight. The polyester diols are poly(ethylene adipate) diol, poly(1,4-butylene adipate) diol, and poly(1,6-hexamethylene adipate) diol. The number average molecular weight of each of the resulting polyurethanes is approximately 25,000 to 30,000. These polyurethanes are injection molded into containers designed in the shape of a "bullet" measuring approximately 5 inches in length and one inch in outside diameter at the top. The wall of the bullet is about 1/16 inch in thickness and is weakened by a slit 1/16 inch wide that extends longitudinally from the rim to a hole near the point of the bullet. The hole is about 1/4 inch wide and about 1/2 inch long. The containers are filled with a mixture containing equal parts of garden soil, Michigan peta moss, and builders sand, and seeded with Douglas Fir. Within the confines of a greenhouse, the containers are then inserted into garden soil enriched with plant nutrients and conditioners. The watering schedule is predetermined and takes into consideration the bullet size, climate, and tree species. After a period of 12 months, normal root structure and normal growth of the tree seedlings are observed. Visual examination of the bullets shows substantial pitting and disintegration.
In Examples 62-84 various blends of poly(alkylene alkanoates) along and with other substances are formed by fluxing on a two-roll mill for periods of time ranging from about 10 to 20 minutes at temperatures generally below about 100°C. depending on the softening point of the components comprising the blend. Plaques measuring about 6 inches × 6 inches × 0.04 inch from the blends are then formed via compression molding techniques. Strips measuring approximately 1 inch × 2 inches × 0.04 inch are cut from each plaque. Strips cut from each plaque are buried in a mixture of equal parts of New Jersey garden soil, Michigan peat moss, and builders sand. After 12 months the strips are removed and measured for weight loss. Visual examination of the strips shows substantial pitting and disintegration. Strips from each plaque are also tested for biodegradation by fungi using ASTM Method D-1924-63. The growth rating is 3 or higher. The composition of the blends is set out in Table VI below.
TABLE VI______________________________________Example No. Composition of Blend______________________________________62 80 PEA.sup.(1) /20 Shredded Paper63 80 PEA/20 Hydroxypropylcellulose64 80 PEA/20 Rice Hulls65 80 PEA/20 Peat Moss66 80 PEA/20 Douglas Fir Bark.sup.(2)67 75 PEA/25 Urea68 75 PEA/25 Egg Albumin69 75 PHS.sup.(3) /25 Rice Hulls70 75 PHS/25 HDPE.sup.(4)71 75 PHS/25 Asbestos72 60 PHS/20 LDPE.sup.(5) /20 PEO.sup.(6)73 70 PHS/30 Polyoxyethylene Diol 20M.sup.(7)74 80 PTS.sup.(8) /20 Glass Wool75 80 PTS/20 Talc76 75 PTS/25 Carbon Black77 65 PTS/35 Limestone78 50 PTS/25 LDPE/25 PEO79 60 PTS/40 Douglas Fir Bark80 60 PEA/40 Douglas Fir Bark81 50 PEPU.sup.(9) /50 Douglas Fir Bark82 70 PEA/30 Thermoplastic Polystyrene83 60 PTS/40 Reclaimed Butadiene/Styrene Rubber84 50 PEA/25 PEO/25 Sawdust______________________________________ Footnotes to Table VI: .sup.(1) PEA represents poly(ethylene adipate), IR of about 0.5, Growth Rating of 4. .sup.(2) Silvacon 412 by Weyerhaeuser Co. .sup.(3) PHS represents poly(1,6-hexamethylene succinate), IR of about 0.9, Growth Rating of 4. .sup.(4) HDPE represents high density polyethylene .sup.(5) LDPE represents low density polyethylene .sup.(6) PEO represents ethylene oxide homopolymer having a number averag molecular weight of about 4,000,000. .sup.(7) Polyoxyethylene diol of approximately 20,000 number average molecular weight. .sup.(8) PTS represents poly(1,4-tetramethylene succinate), IR of about 0.6, Growth Rating of 4. .sup.(9) PEPU represents thermoplastic polyester polyurethane of about 20,000 number average molecular weight prepared by reacting equimolar amounts of poly(1,4-butylene adipate) diol (mol. wt.˜2,000) and bis(4-isocyanatophenyl)methane.
Thermoplastic poly(ethylene adipate), IR of about 0.6, as well as the blends set out in Examples 62-84 are molded into containers designed in the shape of a "bullet" measuring approximately 5 inches in length and one inch in outside diameter at the top. The wall of the bullet is about 1/16 inch in thickness and has a hole near the point of the bullet. The containers are filled with a mixture containing equal parts of garden soil, Michigan peat moss, and builders sand, and seeded with Douglas Fir. Within the confines of a greenhouse, the containers are then inserted into garden soil enriched with plant nutrients and conditioners. The watering schedule is predetermined and takes into consideration the bullet size, climate, and tree species. After a period of 12 months, normal root structure and normal growth of the tree seedlings are observed. Visual examination of the bullets shows substantial pitting and/or disintegration.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2071250 *||Jul 3, 1931||Feb 16, 1937||Du Pont||Linear condensation polymers|
|US2757160 *||Mar 4, 1953||Jul 31, 1956||Allied Chem & Dye Corp||Stable non-tacky granular filled unsaturated alkyd molding compound comprising a liquid monomer and a compatible polymer|
|US3314205 *||May 23, 1963||Apr 18, 1967||Gaco Western Inc||Synthetic elastomeric coated roof surface and methods of applying it|
|US3361690 *||Sep 8, 1966||Jan 2, 1968||Weyerhaeuser Co||Polyester molding composition containing aqueous-alkaliextracted-douglas fir bark fiber as a reinforcing agent|
|US3481257 *||Sep 26, 1966||Dec 2, 1969||Celanese Coatings Co||Epoxy resin-walnut shell aggregate wear resistant floor toppings|
|US3636956 *||May 13, 1970||Jan 25, 1972||Ethicon Inc||Polylactide sutures|
|US3647111 *||Jun 1, 1970||Mar 7, 1972||Biocor Corp||Biodegradable container|
|US3746670 *||May 13, 1971||Jul 17, 1973||Guire H Mc||Automobile polyester body filler|
|1||*||Applied Microbiology, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 900-905, Darby et al.|
|2||*||Chem. Tech., July 1971, pp. 409-415 Rodriquez.|
|3||*||Polymer Preprints, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 629-634, Potts et al., 7/15/72.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4357884 *||Aug 25, 1980||Nov 9, 1982||Henry J. Rast, Jr.||Plant protection system|
|US4477325 *||Nov 8, 1983||Oct 16, 1984||Hollister Incorporated||Skin barrier composition comprising an irradiated crosslinked ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer and polyisobutylene|
|US4496674 *||Nov 17, 1983||Jan 29, 1985||Armstrong World Industries, Inc.||Gasket materials comprising polyester and rice hulls|
|US4810785 *||Jul 17, 1987||Mar 7, 1989||A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company||Crosslinked corn bran and utilization in papermaking|
|US5091262 *||Aug 27, 1990||Feb 25, 1992||Rexene Products Company||Starch filled coextruded degradable polyethylene film|
|US5108677 *||May 1, 1990||Apr 28, 1992||John Ayres||Method of forming a sand base article using a decomposable binder and the article formed thereby|
|US5206087 *||Feb 26, 1991||Apr 27, 1993||Director-General Of Agency Of Industrial Science And Technology||Biodecomposable or biodisintegrable moldable material|
|US5317119 *||Apr 16, 1992||May 31, 1994||Nu-Tech & Engineering, Inc.||Oven safe disposable food container|
|US5330804 *||Mar 27, 1991||Jul 19, 1994||Earth Trends, Inc.||Synthetic wood mulch|
|US5354621 *||Jul 2, 1992||Oct 11, 1994||Beltec International||Biodegradable construction material and manufacturing method|
|US5367003 *||Jun 18, 1993||Nov 22, 1994||Petcavich Robert J||Disposable degradable recyclable plastic articles and synthetic resin blends for making the same|
|US5434238 *||Nov 23, 1994||Jul 18, 1995||Eastman Chemical Company||Copolyesters having repeat units derived from succinic acid|
|US5464878 *||Jun 11, 1993||Nov 7, 1995||Camelot Technologies, Inc.||Degradable polymeric form and process for making|
|US5480962 *||Mar 7, 1994||Jan 2, 1996||Eastman Chemical Company||Copolyesters having repeat units derived from succinic acid|
|US5498453 *||Jun 2, 1995||Mar 12, 1996||Eastman Chemical Company||Copolyesters having repeat units derived from succinic acid|
|US5504158 *||Jan 10, 1995||Apr 2, 1996||Alliedsignal Inc.||Polyphenylene ether/polyterephthalamide blend|
|US5518730 *||Jun 3, 1992||May 21, 1996||Fuisz Technologies Ltd.||Biodegradable controlled release flash flow melt-spun delivery system|
|US5545485 *||May 17, 1995||Aug 13, 1996||Fujitsu Limited||Biodegradable resin molded article|
|US5569514 *||Jan 5, 1994||Oct 29, 1996||Nu-Tech & Engineering, Inc.||Method of forming a sand base article using a decomposable binder and the article formed thereby|
|US5589566 *||Mar 1, 1996||Dec 31, 1996||Eastman Chemical Company||Copolyesters having repeat units derived from succinic acid|
|US5665786 *||May 24, 1996||Sep 9, 1997||Bradley University||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer compositions and expanded articles therefrom|
|US5688448 *||Jun 2, 1995||Nov 18, 1997||The Illinois Institute Of Technology||Method for producing biodegradable products|
|US5714230 *||Nov 15, 1994||Feb 3, 1998||Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals, Inc.||Degradable aliphatic polyester formed products|
|US5744516 *||Sep 11, 1996||Apr 28, 1998||Fujitsu Limited||Biodegradable resin molded article|
|US5763098 *||Jul 14, 1997||Jun 9, 1998||Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.||Degradable aliphatic polyester formed products|
|US5821286 *||May 24, 1996||Oct 13, 1998||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Agriculture||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer compositions and films therefrom|
|US5827905 *||Sep 18, 1996||Oct 27, 1998||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Biodegradable plastics filled with reinforcing materials|
|US5852078 *||Feb 21, 1997||Dec 22, 1998||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Biodegradable polyester compositions with natural polymers and articles thereof|
|US5854345 *||Sep 4, 1997||Dec 29, 1998||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer compositions and expanded articles therefrom|
|US5859090 *||Jan 16, 1996||Jan 12, 1999||Federal Cartridge Company||Injection-modulable, polycaprolactone-based, biodegradable plastic articles such as shotshell components, and method of manufacturing same|
|US5861216 *||Jun 28, 1996||Jan 19, 1999||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer laminates|
|US5870854 *||Oct 3, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Wilkins; Judd R.||Gelatin-plastic foam seed germination and plant growth method|
|US6001891 *||May 29, 1997||Dec 14, 1999||Mitsui Chemicals, Inc.||Biodegradable aliphatic polyester elastomer and preparation process of same|
|US6025417 *||Sep 8, 1997||Feb 15, 2000||Biotechnology Research & Development Corp.||Biodegradable polyester compositions with natural polymers and articles thereof|
|US6040063 *||Jan 15, 1999||Mar 21, 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer laminates|
|US6054510 *||Sep 10, 1998||Apr 25, 2000||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Agriculture||Biodegradable formed article|
|US6114431 *||Nov 7, 1997||Sep 5, 2000||Griffin Corp.||Plastic composition|
|US6301829||Nov 12, 1999||Oct 16, 2001||Eric H. Kaufmann||Landscaping dressing and method|
|US6329032||Aug 10, 2000||Dec 11, 2001||Icc Industries, Inc.||Thermoplastic composition and containers for promoting plant root branching|
|US6586504||Apr 26, 2000||Jul 1, 2003||P & M Signs||Wood and plastic composite material and methods for making same|
|US6626313 *||Jun 7, 2001||Sep 30, 2003||Fischerwerke Artur Fischer Gmbh & Co. Kg||Container for delivery of ichneumon flies and method of agricultural pest control using same|
|US6632387||Aug 5, 2002||Oct 14, 2003||P & M Plastics||Method for making wood and plastic composite material|
|US6893527||Nov 17, 1999||May 17, 2005||William M. Doane||Biodegradable polyester and natural polymer laminates|
|US6903053||Dec 4, 2002||Jun 7, 2005||The Procter & Gamble Company||Agricultural items and agricultural methods comprising biodegradable copolymers|
|US7258922||Jun 3, 2003||Aug 21, 2007||Thi International, Inc.||Compositions, methods and devices for enhancing landscaping or marker materials|
|US7625994||Jul 30, 2002||Dec 1, 2009||E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Sulfonated aliphatic-aromatic copolyetheresters|
|US7888405||Nov 14, 2008||Feb 15, 2011||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Aliphatic-aromatic polyesters, and articles made therefrom|
|US7931423 *||Feb 5, 2009||Apr 26, 2011||Icc Technologies Inc.||Drainage element|
|US7932309 *||Nov 2, 2006||Apr 26, 2011||Hercules Incorporated||Ether derivatives of raw cotton linters for water-borne coatings|
|US8835537||Dec 12, 2008||Sep 16, 2014||Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus||Natural fibre based composite material|
|US20030033960 *||Aug 16, 2002||Feb 20, 2003||Hudzinski Michael E.||Line trimmer, biodegradable trim line for use therewith, and method of making same|
|US20030213168 *||Mar 31, 2003||Nov 20, 2003||Anthony Hesse||Compositions, methods and devices for enhancing landscaping materials|
|US20040024102 *||Oct 24, 2002||Feb 5, 2004||Hayes Richard Allen||Sulfonated aliphatic-aromatic polyetherester films, coatings, and laminates|
|US20040187381 *||Jun 3, 2003||Sep 30, 2004||Anthony Hesse||Compositions, methods and devices for enhancing landscaping or marker materials|
|US20050136177 *||Aug 24, 2004||Jun 23, 2005||Anthony Hesse||Method for coloring landscaping materials using foamable dry colorant|
|US20050230073 *||Mar 30, 2005||Oct 20, 2005||Thi International Llc||Apparatus and method for treating mulch|
|US20060236604 *||Jun 28, 2006||Oct 26, 2006||Thi International, Llc||Compositions, Methods, and Devices for Enhanced Seed Materials|
|US20070105985 *||Nov 2, 2006||May 10, 2007||Gillette Paul C||Ether derivatives of raw cotton linters for water-borne coatings|
|US20080171150 *||Aug 6, 2007||Jul 17, 2008||Thi International, Llc||Apparatus and Method for Treating Mulch|
|US20090025290 *||Jul 25, 2008||Jan 29, 2009||Ball Horticultural Company||Bottomless plant container|
|US20090123767 *||Nov 14, 2008||May 14, 2009||Gohil Rameshchandra M||Aliphatic-aromatic polyesters, and articles made therefrom|
|US20100111607 *||Feb 5, 2009||May 6, 2010||Bussey Jr Harry||Drainage element|
|US20100115836 *||Nov 13, 2009||May 13, 2010||Julian Brandon J||Biodegradable agricultural growth management tools|
|US20100313469 *||Jun 15, 2010||Dec 16, 2010||Karen Nixon-Lane||Adhesive-based decorative landscaping product and method|
|US20100317770 *||Dec 12, 2008||Dec 16, 2010||Johanna Lampinen||Natural fibre based composite material|
|US20110097530 *||Jan 6, 2011||Apr 28, 2011||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Non-sulfonated Aliphatic-Aromatic Polyesters, and Articles Made Therefrom|
|US20160000022 *||Feb 14, 2014||Jan 7, 2016||Sphere Group Spain, S.L.||Biodegradable mulch for agricultural applications|
|CN102482461A *||May 18, 2010||May 30, 2012||瓦克化学股份公司||Bioplastics|
|CN103160133A *||Mar 28, 2013||Jun 19, 2013||南京工业大学||Full degradation biomass composite material and preparation method thereof|
|CN103160133B *||Mar 28, 2013||Feb 18, 2015||南京工业大学||Full degradation biomass composite material and preparation method thereof|
|EP0444880A2 *||Feb 26, 1991||Sep 4, 1991||Director-General Of The Agency Of Industrial Science And Technology||Biodecomposable or biodisintegrable moldable material|
|EP0444880B1 *||Feb 26, 1991||May 7, 1997||Director-General Of The Agency Of Industrial Science And Technology||Process for manufacture of a moldable biodegradable material|
|EP0765911A2 *||Sep 13, 1996||Apr 2, 1997||Bayer Ag||Reinforced biodegradable plastics|
|EP0765911A3 *||Sep 13, 1996||May 20, 1998||Bayer Ag||Reinforced biodegradable plastics|
|EP0786496A3 *||Dec 4, 1996||Dec 29, 1997||Ichiro Sugimoto||Biodegradable plastic product made from coconut husk fiber powder mixture|
|EP2184308A2||Oct 20, 2009||May 12, 2010||E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company||Aliphatic-aromatic polyesters, and articles made therefrom|
|EP2231782A1 *||Dec 12, 2008||Sep 29, 2010||Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus||Natural fibre based composite material|
|EP2231782A4 *||Dec 12, 2008||May 30, 2012||Valtion Teknillinen||Natural fibre based composite material|
|WO1990014388A1 *||May 18, 1990||Nov 29, 1990||Agri-Tech Industries, Inc.||Injection molded biodegradable starch polymer composite|
|WO2001093678A2 *||Jun 8, 2001||Dec 13, 2001||The Procter & Gamble Company||Agricultural items and methods comprising biodegradable copolymers|
|WO2001093678A3 *||Jun 8, 2001||Jun 13, 2002||Procter & Gamble||Agricultural items and methods comprising biodegradable copolymers|
|WO2009074723A1 *||Dec 12, 2008||Jun 18, 2009||Valtion Teknillinen Tutkimuskeskus||Natural fibre based composite material|
|WO2013123447A1 *||Feb 15, 2013||Aug 22, 2013||Oms Investments, Inc.||Plant growing system and methods of using the same|
|U.S. Classification||47/74, 524/55, 524/16, 525/408, 260/DIG.43, 524/34, 525/177, 524/9, 525/438, 47/9, 524/22, 524/15, 526/914, 524/14, 525/437, 524/26, 220/DIG.30, 524/47, 524/56, 524/17, 525/425|
|International Classification||B65D65/46, C08L97/02, C08L67/02|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02W90/13, Y10S220/30, Y10S526/914, Y10S260/43, B65D65/466, C08L97/02, C08L67/02|
|European Classification||C08L97/02, C08L67/02, B65D65/46C|
|Jan 9, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, AND MOR
Free format text: MORTGAGE;ASSIGNORS:UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, A CORP.,;STP CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE.,;UNION CARBIDE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS CO., INC., A CORP. OF PA.,;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:004547/0001
Effective date: 19860106
|Oct 8, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,
Free format text: RELEASED BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN BANK (DELAWARE) AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:004665/0131
Effective date: 19860925