Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.


  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS3941206 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 05/468,188
Publication dateMar 2, 1976
Filing dateMay 8, 1974
Priority dateMay 8, 1974
Also published asCA1020823A, CA1020823A1
Publication number05468188, 468188, US 3941206 A, US 3941206A, US-A-3941206, US3941206 A, US3941206A
InventorsEdmund John Halter
Original AssigneeBurgess Industries Incorporated
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Noise attenuating snubber
US 3941206 A
The pulsating gas flow tube is open to the surrounding acoustic surge chamber through a relatively large opening at the inlet end of the snubber and perforations in the tube, and the chamber is filled with acoustically penetrable media which broadens the frequency range over which the chamber is acoustically effective. To handle moisture-laden gases without loss of acoustical efficiency, a coalescing element is provided to collect and remove moisture and prevent the accumulation thereof in the media.
Previous page
Next page
I claim:
1. In a noise attenuating snubber including means forming an elongated enclosure having an inlet and an outlet, a gas flow tube arranged lengthwise within said enclosure for the passage of a pulsating gas stream therethrough, said tube having perforations therein throughout substantially the entire length thereof and extending from the outlet end toward but stopping short of the inlet end of said enclosure to provide a gap opening to extending from said inlet to said outlet of said enclosure and between said enclosure and an acoustic surge chamber said tube, the improvement which comprises the provision of acoustically penetrable media arranged within and filling the surge chamber, said chamber being closed except for the perforations in the flow tube and the gap opening thereinto, the arrangement being such that the portion of the gases of the pulses which expand into the surge chamber through said gap flow into or through said media before discharge from the snubber.
2. Structure in accordance with claim 1 wherein the acoustically penetrable media comprises glass fibers packed to a density of from 5 to 15 pounds per cubic foot.
3. Structure in accordance with claim 1 wherein the acoustically penetrable media comprises glass fibers packed to a density of approximately 10.5 pounds per cubic foot.
4. Structure in accordance with claim 1 wherein the elongated enclosure and gas flow tube are vertically disposed and including a layer of wire mesh upon and extending the length of the gas flow tube and spanning the gap at the inlet end of said tube.
5. Structure in accordance with claim 1 adapted for the handling of pulsating gas streams having fine particles of liquid entrained therewith and wherein the elongated enclosure is vertically disposed and including means for separating out the larger liquid particles from the gases prior to entry into the snubber, said tube having a covering of wire mesh which also spans the gap at the inlet end of said tube to intercept and coalesce fine particles of liquid carried by gases passing through said mesh into the media, the bottom wall of the elongated enclosure having a drain hole therein for the escape of liquid from the surge chamber.

A wide variety of mufflers, silencers and snubbers have been devised to minimize the noise otherwise resulting from the direct exposure of pulsating flowing gases to the atmosphere. The treatment of such gas streams is limited by the necessity of avoiding adverse effects on the apparatus into which or from which the streams flow. The apparatus of U.S. Pat. No. 2,562,101 is an example of a reasonably effective unit which, by reason of the straight-through flow path of the gas stream, creates a minimum of resistance to the flow so that the effect on the operation and efficiency of the equipment involved is minimal. Because the effectiveness of this type of snubber depends upon the length of the snubbing chamber with respect to the frequency of the sound to be absorbed, it should be designed, for greatest efficiency, to meet the requirements of the frequency content of a particular application. Better sound absorbing operation is obtained when this length is one-quarter of the wave length of the sound to be attenuated and poorest performance results when this length is one-half of the wave length of the sound. Thus, a particular unit is somewhat selective and limited performancewise.

The object of the present invention is to provide a noise attenuating snubber of the type described which, for a given unit, is effective over a broader range of sound frequencies. More specifically, the object is to provide such apparatus wherein the snubbing or surge chamber is filled with acoustically penetrable media and the gas flow communication with the chamber is provided by a relatively large opening at the upstream end thereof and by the perforations of the gas flow tube which interiorly defines the chamber to achieve a noise attenuating unit which is effective over a relatively broad range of frequencies.

A further object is to provide means for removing entrained moisture from the gases which flow into the surge chamber in order to maintain the acoustic effectiveness of the media and thus of the chamber and unit.


FIG. 1 is an elevational view of the noise attenuating snubber with an entrained liquid separator combined therewith.

FIG. 2 is a top view of the unit of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the snubber section of the unit of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view taken at the line 4-4 of the FIG. 3.


Although the noise attenuating snubber may be used as a unit for silencing the exhaust, for example, of reciprocating engines, rotary blowers, vacuum pumps, compressors and the like, it provides very statisfactory service in the silencing of the discharge of wet vacuum pumps. Since the latter requires separation and removal of liquid particles entrained with the flowing gases, a combined separator and snubber is illustrated in the drawings and described as a specific embodiment of the invention.

A cylindrical housing 1 is closed at its top and bottom by walls 2 and 3, respectively. A partition 4 divides the interior of the housing into a separating chamber 5 and a snubber section 6. The inlet comprises a threaded snout 7 and flattened tangential horn 8 which is designed to cause the inflowing gas stream to swirl around the interior of the housing to throw entrained liquid particles against the surface of the housing. A liquid drain tube 9 is provided at the bottom of the unit.

Top wall 2 and partition 4 have openings at their centers for the passage of the gas stream through the snubber section. A threaded outlet snout 10 extends through the opening in wall 2 and is affixed thereto. A perforated gas flow tube 11 extends from snout 10 to a point short of partition 4, leaving a gap 12. A gas flow straightening vane assembly including vanes 13 and a short length of tube 14 is mounted in and between the opening in partition 4 and the inlet end of gas flow tube 11.

The perforated gas flow tube 11 and gap 12 are covered by two layers 15 of stainless steel mesh wire cloth. The acoustic surge chamber 16 surrounding the wire cloth within the housing is filled with an acoustically penetrable media such as unoriented glass fiber.

For best results, optimum design criteria should be followed. Preferably, the area of gap 12 should be approximately four times the cross-sectional area of tube 11 and the total area of the perforations of the tube 11 should be about two times the cross-sectional area of the tube. The dimensions of the wire cloth 15 are not critical; 18 × 18 stainless steel mesh, wire diameter 0.009 inches, is satisfactory. The glass fiber media may be packed to a density of approximately 10.5 pounds per cubic foot although good results have been obtained with densities in the range of 5 to 15 pounds per cubic foot.

The size of silencing equipment is important both from the standpoint of valuable space occupied by the apparatus and also the cost of the unit. Since the speed of sound in the media packed snubbing chamber 16 is substantially less than that of the empty chamber, the acoustical effect of packing is equivalent to the lengthening of the chamber. More important, it has been found that the range of frequencies attenuated by the action of the acoustic surge chamber is substantially broadened by the presence of the acoustically penetrable media.

In the operation of the apparatus described, the inlet snout 7 is connected to the outlet conduit of the apparatus which is the gas stream noise source. After treatment in the separating chamber, the gases flow into the snubber section through tube 14 and the flow straightening vanes as a succession of high-pressure surges or slugs separated by intervening stretches of low pressure. The slugs, which comprise masses of gas under high pressure, expand through gap 12 into the media-packed acoustic surge chamber 16. As these gases flow through the media, the velocity, pressure and kinetic energy are greatly reduced and dissipated. A portion of the incoming slugs are bled out through the perforations in flow tube 11. Another portion of the slugs are reflected from wall 2 back through the media to meet the incoming slugs at the gap end of the chamber. If the effective acoustical length of the chamber is approximately one-quarter of the frequency of the slugs of the incoming stream, the reflected pulses are out of phase with the slug pulsations of the incoming stream and the action of the chamber is to attenuate the magnitude of the slug pressures. The favorable time delay in the arrival of the reflected pulsation due to the flow resistance of the media makes it possible to achieve the desired attenuation with a shorter chamber.

Actually, the flowing gas system as the stream flows into the snubber usually includes a mixture of potentially noisy vibrating systems in addition to the succession of slugs. These systems, being exposed to the acoustical impedance of the media as the gases pass through the snubber, are greatly attenuated. The overall result is a relatively smoothly flowing stream of gases with minimal potential for noise flowing from the outlet 10 of the unit.

The action described is greatly compromised by the presence of liquid in the media since the liquid to the extent present interferes with the passage of the gases through the media. Although the major part of the entrained liquid is removed by the action in the separating chamber 5, very fine particles are carried along into the snubber chamber. While the mesh layers 15 serve to confine the media to the space within chamber 16, an important function of the mesh when the apparatus is employed to treat the discharge of a wet vacuum pump is protection of the media from loss of effectiveness due to the accumulation of the liquid in it. The mesh serves to coalesce the fine particles and provide surfaces along which the liquid may flow to the area of gap 12 where the liquid may be re-entrained by the gas stream and carried out of the unit. If such re-entrainment is undesirable for particular applications, one or more openings 4a may be provided in partition 4 to permit any accumulation of liquid to drain down into the separating chamber.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1995071 *Dec 2, 1929Mar 19, 1935Buffalo Pressed Steel CompanySilencer
US2652899 *Feb 13, 1948Sep 22, 1953Air Maze CorpSilencer with a resonance chamber
US2824619 *Jul 18, 1955Feb 25, 1958Bremer De La WilmoreMuffler
US2834425 *Apr 2, 1954May 13, 1958Grand Sheet Metal Products CoExhaust muffler
US2937707 *Dec 6, 1955May 24, 1960Ernst JosefMuffler for silencing gases
US3166382 *Sep 7, 1962Jan 19, 1965Universal Oil Prod CoConverter-muffler
US3735567 *Jul 12, 1971May 29, 1973C ViersEngine exhaust filter-muffler
US3744589 *Jun 9, 1972Jul 10, 1973Gen Motors CorpSwirling flow muffler
DE1031055B *Sep 6, 1955May 29, 1958Eberspaecher JBehaelter mit Schallschluckstoffuellung und Fuehrungskanal fuer pulsierende Gasstroemung, insbesondere Schalldaempfer fuer Brennkraftmaschinen
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4747467 *Apr 1, 1986May 31, 1988Allied-Signal Inc.Turbine engine noise suppression apparatus and methods
US5020631 *Apr 6, 1990Jun 4, 1991Devil, Societe AnonymeModular silencer
US5705777 *Oct 20, 1995Jan 6, 1998Carrier CorporationRefrigeration compressor muffler
US5784784 *Nov 25, 1996Jul 28, 1998Carrier CorporationMethod of making a refrigeration compressor muffler
US5844178 *Oct 13, 1995Dec 1, 1998Lothringen; Leopold HabsburgResonance muffler
US6425742 *Apr 30, 1998Jul 30, 2002Taiko Kikai Industries, Ltd.Discharge silencer provided with drain recovering function
US7017706 *Dec 16, 2002Mar 28, 2006Honeywell International, Inc.Turbine noise absorber
US7527053 *Mar 23, 2005May 5, 2009Cardinal Health 203, Inc.Method and apparatus for attenuating compressor noise
US7607437May 18, 2004Oct 27, 2009Cardinal Health 203, Inc.Compressor control system and method for a portable ventilator
US7681690 *Jul 8, 2008Mar 23, 2010Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise abatement device for a pneumatic tool
US7735603 *May 28, 2008Jun 15, 2010Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise reducing device for a pneumatic tool
US7845464Dec 7, 2010Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise abatement device for a pneumatic tool
US7997885Aug 16, 2011Carefusion 303, Inc.Roots-type blower reduced acoustic signature method and apparatus
US8118024Jul 13, 2006Feb 21, 2012Carefusion 203, Inc.Mechanical ventilation system utilizing bias valve
US8156937Apr 17, 2012Carefusion 203, Inc.Portable ventilator system
US8205716Jun 26, 2012J. Eberspächer GmbH & Co. KGExhaust muffler
US8215449Jul 10, 2012Longyear Tm, Inc.Muffler system for noise abatement and ice control
US8297279Oct 30, 2012Carefusion 203, Inc.Portable ventilator system
US8522780Mar 1, 2007Sep 3, 2013Carefusion 203, Inc.Portable ventilator system
US8627819Jun 2, 2006Jan 14, 2014Carefusion 203, Inc.Portable ventilator system
US8677995Oct 23, 2007Mar 25, 2014Carefusion 203, Inc.Compressor control system for a portable ventilator
US8683997Oct 31, 2007Apr 1, 2014Carefusion 203, Inc.Portable ventilator system
US8888711Apr 8, 2008Nov 18, 2014Carefusion 203, Inc.Flow sensor
US9375166Nov 17, 2014Jun 28, 2016Carefusion 203, Inc.Flow sensor
US20030118762 *Dec 16, 2002Jun 26, 2003Brown Daniel V.Turbine noise absorber
US20040099477 *Sep 17, 2001May 27, 2004Mats AbomSound absorbent
US20050031322 *May 18, 2004Feb 10, 2005David BoyleCompressor control system for a portable ventilator
US20050166921 *Mar 23, 2005Aug 4, 2005Pulmonetic Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for attenuating compressor noise
US20060144396 *Sep 23, 2005Jul 6, 2006Devries Douglas FPortable ventilator system
US20060213518 *Jun 2, 2006Sep 28, 2006Devries Douglas FPortable ventilator system
US20070000490 *Jun 2, 2006Jan 4, 2007Devries Douglas FPortable ventilator system
US20080053438 *Oct 31, 2007Mar 6, 2008Devries Douglas FPortable ventilator system
US20080092892 *Oct 23, 2007Apr 24, 2008Pulmonetic Systems, Inc.Compressor Control System for a Portable Ventilator
US20090090530 *Jul 8, 2008Apr 9, 2009Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise abatement device for a pneumatic tool
US20090142213 *Mar 18, 2008Jun 4, 2009Pulmonetic Systems, Inc.Roots-type blower reduced acoustic signature method and apparatus
US20090250059 *Apr 8, 2008Oct 8, 2009Pulmonetic Systems, Inc.Flow sensor
US20090294211 *May 28, 2008Dec 3, 2009Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise reducing device for a pneumatic tool
US20100155174 *Mar 10, 2010Jun 24, 2010Longyear Tm, Inc.Noise abatement device for a pneumatic tool
US20110126541 *Dec 2, 2009Jun 2, 2011Longyear Tm, Inc.Muffler system for noise abatement and ice control
US20110192676 *Aug 11, 2011Georg WirthExhaust muffler
DE102010007012A1 *Feb 5, 2010Aug 11, 2011J. Eberspächer GmbH & Co. KG, 73730Schalldämpfer
EP0395540A1 *Apr 13, 1990Oct 31, 1990DEVIL (Société anonyme)Modular silencer
U.S. Classification181/256
International ClassificationF01N1/06, F01N1/10
Cooperative ClassificationF01N1/06, F01N1/10
European ClassificationF01N1/10, F01N1/06
Legal Events
Jul 13, 1984ASAssignment
Effective date: 19840614
Oct 1, 1984ASAssignment
Effective date: 19840618