|Publication number||US3971633 A|
|Application number||US 05/548,661|
|Publication date||Jul 27, 1976|
|Filing date||Feb 10, 1975|
|Priority date||Feb 10, 1975|
|Also published as||CA1069391A, CA1069391A1, DE2604960A1, DE2604960B2, DE2604960C3|
|Publication number||05548661, 548661, US 3971633 A, US 3971633A, US-A-3971633, US3971633 A, US3971633A|
|Inventors||Thomas A. Wolfla, Robert C. Tucker, Jr.|
|Original Assignee||Union Carbide Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (21), Classifications (31), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to a coating system for protecting metallic substrates in reducing and oxygen-free environments. More particularly this invention relates to a coating system for protecting metallic components in sodium or helium cooled nuclear reactors.
Nuclear reactors contain components in which metallic surfaces are designed to move relative to each other. Due to the friction between metallic surfaces, the forces required to initiate and sustain movement can be quite large. Metallic mechanisms in nuclear reactors which use liquid sodium as the working heat transfer fluid are particularly plagued with high frictional forces due to the presence of this aggressive, high temperature corrosive medium.
Metallic surfaces immersed in sodium at elevated temperature are stripped by dissolution or reduction of any oxide films which are normally present on virtually all metals. These films, present in most other environments, reduce friction and prevent diffusion bonding by separating the elemental metallic surfaces. It is well known that ceramic materials such as oxide films have low self-mating friction coefficients and do not diffusion bond except at extremely high temperatures and/or pressures because of the highly directional ionic bonding of ceramics. Other films may be hydrates of oxides or absorbed molecules of gaseous species, but again the bonding, predominantly polar in these cases, is highly directional and resists diffusion bonding.
The virtually atomically clean metal surfaces in sodium will, however, rapidly diffusion bond or self-weld together at any point of contact because metallic bonding is not highly oriented or directional and "diffusional" bonding across perfectly clean interfaces is uninhibited. It is quite apparent, therefore, that any metal-to-metal contacts must be prevented if relative motion between these surfaces is required in such an environment.
Accordingly, it is the main object of this invention to provide a coating system for metallic substrates used in a reducing or oxygen-free environments which system will prevent self welding of the mating metallic surfaces while exhibiting good wear and thermal shock properties.
The most practical method of preventing metal-to-metal contact is to coat the surfaces with materials which resist diffusion bonding and have low coefficients of friction. It is also obvious that these coatings must be effectively insoluble in sodium and not react with sodium to form other compounds, nor can the coating be degraded by reaction with the metal substrate. Moreover, they must be wear resistant if any extensive amount of motion is anticipated. Since they must endure a number of cycles from room temperature to operatng temperatures as well as thermal variations during operation, they must be thermal shock resistant. Obviously, if they are used in the reactor core they must also withstand irradiation.
Some ceramic materials would be likely candidates for this type coating because they resist self-welding. Unfortunately, most ceramic materials have poor thermal shock resistance, particularly when applied as a coating on a metal. The thermal shock resistance of a coating system (coating plus substrate) is a function of the individual and relative coefficients of thermal expansion of the components as well as their heat capacities, thermal conductivity, and mechanical properties. The coefficients of thermal expansion of ceramics are much lower than metals, thus on heating metallic components coated with a ceramic, a stress higher than the mechanical strength of the coating can easily be achieved causing cracking and spalling to the coating. The low thermal conductivity and heat capacity of ceramics hampers their ability to rapidly distribute thermal loads and, therefore, local stresses generated during thermal cycling. As a result of these factors, ceramic coatings have not been successfully used on components in liquid sodium environments. Because of their poor impact strength, ceramics and, in particular, ceramic coatings are also susceptible to mechanical damage which causes cracking and spalling of the coating rendering it unprotective.
Cermet material applied as coatings have shown promise in solving friction and wear problems in sodium systems. Cermets are at least a two phase system composed of predominantly a ceramic component with a metallic component (binder). The volume fraction of the metallic component can be adjusted to enhance the properties of the cermets. Cermets by their very nature possess improved thermal shock resistance compared to ceramics. The presence of the metallic phase also significantly improves the impact strength while preserving most of the wear resistance of the ceramic. One such system, which has demonstrated the ability of a cermet coating to reduce friction and wear of sliding components in high temperature sodium, is a Cr3 C2 plus 15 vol percent nickel chromium coating applied using the detonation gun technique. Table 1 compares the friction and wear characteristics of both plasma-deposited and detonation gun Cr3 C2 plus nickel chromium coatings on 316 stainless steel with uncoated 316 stainless steel in self-mating wear. The designation 316 stainless steel is an American Iron and Steel Institute designation for a stainless steel which nominally contains about 16- 18 wt % chromium; 10-14 wt % nickel; 2 wt % manganese; 2-3 wt % molybdenum; 1 wt % silicon; and .08 carbon balance iron.
Table 1 shows three friction coefficients. The static friction coefficient is that observed at the moment of impending motion. The dynamic friction coefficient is that observed after motion has begun. The break away friction coefficient is defined in much the same way as the static friction coefficient except that it is usually a function of time. Table 1 also shows that the plasma-deposited Cr3 C2 plus nickel chromium coating is not as thermal shock resistant and suffers from irradiation damage; however, the friction and wear properties are very good suggesting that this coating may still be useful in a sodium system in areas where thermal cycling or irradiation effects are negligible or non existent.
Table 1__________________________________________________________________________ Uncoated 316 Cr3 C2 plus Nickel Cr3 C2 plus Nickel S.S. Chromium Coated Chromium Coated 316 S.S. D-Gun 316 S.S. Plasma__________________________________________________________________________Corrosion Rate mils/yr .2 .15 .15Friction Coefficient >1 .39 .39StaticFriction Coefficient .8 .36 .36DynamicFriction Coefficient >1 .64 .64Break-awayWear Rate high negligible negligibleNo. of Thermal N/A* >60 <60Cycles to FailureIrradiation Effects - >3×1022 neutron/ 1×1022 neutron/cm2Total Fluence to Failure cm2__________________________________________________________________________ >means greater than, <means less than. *N/A = not applicable.
The friction, wear, and corrosion values of Cr3 C2 plus nickel chromium coated 316 stainless steel shown in Table 1 are quite adequate for most current reactor designs. For new, more advanced reactors improved coatings are required. In particular, coatings which have lower friction coefficients are a necessity.
This invention is based on the discovery that a combination of a cermet layer with a thin overlay of pure chromium carbide provides excellent friction and wear properties and, with suitable adjustments in the thickness of the chromium carbide overlayer within a given range, excellent thermal shock and mechanical strength of the coating can be maintained. While there exist numerous methods for achieving this type of structure, the most practical way is to deposit a duplex coating consisting of two distinct layers.
A preferred system of the invention consists of an inner layer of cermet made from a powder mixture of Cr3 C2 and a nickel 20 wt % chromium alloy and an outer layer made from a powder of Cr3 C2. Consideration of all of the thermal, mechanical and wear factors indicates that the range of thickness of the two layers should be from 0.001 to 0.015 for the inner layer and from 0.0005 to 0.005 inches for the outer layer. The composition of the inner layer may vary from 10 wt % nickel-chromium alloy to 30 wt %. Similarly, some variation in the chromium content is allowable, consistent with its mechanical performance. It is well known that Cr3 C2 when plasma or detonation gun deposited crystallizes as a mixture of the carbide phases, but in typical service in sodium cooled reactors the transformation to the thermodynamically stable state occurs very slowly over a long period of time and does not destroy the coating.
The superiority of the coatings of this invention was demonstrated by producing and testing a coating consisting of two layers. The first was a mixture of Cr3 C2 plus 11 weight percent of an alloy of 80 percent nickel -- 20 percent chromium deposited to a thickness of .003 inches to .004 inches by the detonation gun process on 316 stainless (containing 20% cold worked). A second layer was then deposited by the detonation gun process over the first layer which consisted of 100 percent Cr3 C2 to a thickness of 0.0005 to 0.0015 inches. Test coupons coated in this manner were evaluated in liquid sodium at elevated temperature to measure the friction and wear properties. A summary of these results are shown in Table 2.
Table 2__________________________________________________________________________ Uncoated Cr3 C2 plus Nickel Cr3 C2 /Cr3 C2 plus 316 S.S. Chromium Coated Nickel Chromium 316 S.S. D-Gun Coated 316 S.S. D-Gun__________________________________________________________________________Corrosion Rate mil/yr .2 .15 <.15Friction Coefficient Static >1 .39 .4Friction Coefficient .8 .36 .15DynamicFriction Coefficient >1 .64 .4Break-awayWear Rate high negligible negligibleNo. of Thermal Cycles >60 >60to FailureIrradiation Effects >3×1022 neutron/cm2 not available__________________________________________________________________________
The superior performance of the coating of this invention relative to the cermet coatings in Table 1 is apparent. It is thought that the higher coefficients of friction of the cermets is due to the metal-to-metal contact of the binder phase, even though this accounts for only a small percentage of the exposed surface area. Since there is no metallic phase at the surface in the coatings of this invention, there is no metal-to-metal contact and low coefficients of friction are achieved.
Thermal shock resistance and mechanical impact resistance are surprisingly high, due to the graduation in properties from the metallic sustrate to the cermet, to the pure oxide.
An additional attribute of the coatings of this invention is the inherent safety factor arising from the presence of an undercoat with good, if not superior, wear and friction characteristics. Thus, if through mishandling during assembly any mechanical damage to the ceramic outer layer does occur, the cermet underlayer will prevent complete seizure or excessive frictional drag.
Another preferred system of the invention includes an inner layer of Cr23 C6 plus nickel chromium with a surface layer of pure Cr23 C6. It has been discovered that Cr23 C6, the softest of the chromium carbides, can be mixed with nickel-chromoum binder to produce a plasma or detonation gun coating having extremely long life. See copending application Ser. No. 545,832 filed Jan. 31, 1975. such coating compositions have long term thermodynamic stability which is critical due to the anticipated long service life of nuclear reactor components. A preferred composition for the inner layer is 70-95 wt % Cr23 C6 the balance being a binder of nickel--chromium, cobalt--chromium, iron--chromium or a superalloy.
Other systems within the scope of this invention would include a duplex system composed of a Cr3 C2 plus nickel-chromium layer with an overlay of Cr7 C3 or Cr23 C6 or a mixture of Cr3 C2, Cr7 C3 and Cr23 C6. Another system would include a Cr23 C6 plus nickel-chromium layer with an overlay of Cr3 C2 or mixtures of Cr3 C2 Cr7 C3 and Cr23 C6.
While the preferred system consists of a duplex system of two distinct layers, it is possible to utilize a gradated system of more than two layers or a continuously increasing carbide content from the substrate to the pure chromium carbide outlayer.
While all of the data above was developed using 316 stainless steel substrates, it is readily apparent that structural components of other metal alloys can be equally well protected. For example, the nickel--chromium binder or an Inconel 718 binder would work well on Inconel 718 substrates. Inconel 718 is a nickel base superalloy and nominally contains nickel; 18.6 wt % chromium; 3.1 wt % molybdenum; 5.0 wt % niobium; 18.5 wt % iron; 0.9 wt % titanium; 0.4 wt % aluminum; 0.04 wt % carbon; 0.20 wt % manganese; and 0.30 wt % silicon.
All of the above description has been directed to sodium-cooled reactors; however, there are other systems in which the coatings of this invention may be particularly useful. One of these is helium-cooled reactors in which the helium gas is actually reducing to most metal oxides so similar metal-to-metal friction and wear problems exist.
Having described the invention with respect to certain preferred embodiments it should be understood that certain modifications can be made to structures described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2048276 *||Apr 21, 1932||Jul 21, 1936||Bruno S Teschner||Plated metal having carbide surface|
|US3556747 *||Nov 7, 1967||Jan 19, 1971||Koppers Co Inc||Piston ring coatings for high temperature applications|
|US3606359 *||Aug 8, 1969||Sep 20, 1971||Ramsey Corp||Tungsten carbide coated piston rings|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4334927 *||Dec 8, 1980||Jun 15, 1982||Hyde Glenn F||Piston ring coatings|
|US4999259 *||Nov 17, 1989||Mar 12, 1991||Nippon Steel Corp.||Chrome-coated stainless steel having good atmospheric corrosion resistance|
|US5449562 *||Oct 8, 1993||Sep 12, 1995||Gec Alsthom Electromecanique Sa||Coating for portions of a part of martensitic steel that rub in rotation|
|US5555280 *||Dec 30, 1994||Sep 10, 1996||Framatome||Process and device for producing a leakproof protective coating on a surface of a nuclear reactor component|
|US5579534 *||May 19, 1995||Nov 26, 1996||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Heat-resistant member|
|US6451454 *||Jun 29, 1999||Sep 17, 2002||General Electric Company||Turbine engine component having wear coating and method for coating a turbine engine component|
|US6827254 *||Jun 25, 2002||Dec 7, 2004||General Electric Company||Turbine engine component having wear coating and method for coating a turbine engine component|
|US7438741 *||Apr 22, 2004||Oct 21, 2008||Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company||Erosion-corrosion resistant carbide cermets for long term high temperature service|
|US7836847||Feb 17, 2006||Nov 23, 2010||Howmedica Osteonics Corp.||Multi-station rotation system for use in spray operations|
|US7981479||May 24, 2010||Jul 19, 2011||Howmedica Osteonics Corp.||Multi-station rotation system for use in spray operations|
|US8827276||Apr 15, 2010||Sep 9, 2014||Federal-Mogul Burscheid Gmbh||Sliding member having a thermally sprayed coating and method for producing same|
|US20020189722 *||Jun 25, 2002||Dec 19, 2002||Hasz Wayne Charles||Turbine engine component having wear coating and method for coating a turbine engine component|
|US20040124231 *||Sep 17, 2003||Jul 1, 2004||Hasz Wayne Charles||Method for coating a substrate|
|US20070017958 *||Sep 25, 2006||Jan 25, 2007||Hasz Wayne C||Method for coating a substrate and articles coated therewith|
|US20070193509 *||Feb 17, 2006||Aug 23, 2007||Howmedica Osteonics Corp.||Multi-station rotation system for use in spray operations|
|US20080276757 *||Apr 22, 2004||Nov 13, 2008||Narasimha-Rao Venkata Bangaru||Erosion-corrosion resistant carbide cermets for long term high temperature service|
|US20090191416 *||Jan 22, 2009||Jul 30, 2009||Kermetico Inc.||Method for deposition of cemented carbide coating and related articles|
|US20100266780 *||May 24, 2010||Oct 21, 2010||Howmedica Osteonics Corp.||Multi-station rotation system for use in spray operations|
|DE2954305C2 *||May 18, 1979||Oct 10, 1985||Union Carbide Corp., Danbury, Conn., Us||Title not available|
|DE3218402A1 *||May 15, 1982||Nov 24, 1983||Davy Mckee Ag||Method for the surface coating of thread-guiding components and thread-guiding components manufactured by the method|
|WO2011012336A1 *||Apr 15, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Federal-Mogul Burscheid Gmbh||Sliding member having a thermally sprayed coating and method for producing same|
|U.S. Classification||428/552, 428/685, 75/240, 428/557, 428/926, 428/562|
|International Classification||C23C30/00, C22C29/06, C23C28/00, C23C4/06, G21C13/08, C23C4/02|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T428/12979, Y10T428/12056, Y10T428/12125, Y10T428/1209, Y10S428/926, C23C28/345, C23C28/34, C23C28/321, C23C28/3455, C23C28/341, C23C4/02, C23C4/06|
|European Classification||C23C28/341, C23C28/34, C23C28/321, C23C28/3455, C23C28/345, C23C4/02, C23C4/06|
|Jan 9, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MORGAN GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK, AND MOR
Free format text: MORTGAGE;ASSIGNORS:UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, A CORP.,;STP CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE.,;UNION CARBIDE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS CO., INC., A CORP. OF PA.,;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:004547/0001
Effective date: 19860106
|Oct 8, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION,
Free format text: RELEASED BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:MORGAN BANK (DELAWARE) AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:004665/0131
Effective date: 19860925
|Feb 9, 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNION CARBIDE COATINGS SERVICE TECHNOLOGY CORPORAT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:UNION CARBIDE COATINGS SERVICE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:005240/0883
Effective date: 19900102
|Dec 3, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: PRAXAIR S.T. TECHNOLOGY, INC., COLORADO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:UNION CARBIDE COATINGS SERVICE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:006334/0986
Effective date: 19920611