|Publication number||US4053399 A|
|Application number||US 05/573,130|
|Publication date||Oct 11, 1977|
|Filing date||Apr 30, 1975|
|Priority date||Apr 30, 1975|
|Publication number||05573130, 573130, US 4053399 A, US 4053399A, US-A-4053399, US4053399 A, US4053399A|
|Inventors||Lawrence A. Donnelly, Leland C. Flocke, Victor H. Himel, John J. Mikals, Alfred E. Munier, Lawrence Slote|
|Original Assignee||Grumman Aerospace Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (54), Classifications (17)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention described herein was made in the course of or under a contract, or a sub-contract thereunder, with the Department of Transportation.
This invention relates to a method and system for treating raw sewage and more particularly to a method and system for treating raw sewage on marine vessels or on mobile land units from such sources as showers, lavatories, kitchens, or, in the case of shipboard applications, the galley, head, laundry, sanitary system and deck drains below water level. Sewage-containing liquid treated in accordance with this invention is rendered suitable for recycling through the various systems from which it came or discharging into streams, lakes or other receptacles. The present invention can be adapted for use in marine vessels, mobile land units, or land base units where space, and therefore compactness, is a significant consideration.
Raw sewage generally consists of both solid waste matter and organic solids dissolved and suspended in liquid. This sewage is high in BOD (Biological Oxygen Demand), coliform bacteria and other potential ecological pollutants. It has been and remains common practice simply to discharge untreated waste and sewage directly into streams, rivers, lakes, etc.
Recently, concern over increasing environmental pollution, especially in navigable waterways and lakes, has led to the enactment of pollution control laws prohibiting the discharge of raw sewage from marine vessels and establishing maximum levels for ecological pollutants in sewage which may be discharged. In addition, it is anticipated that eventually ocean or foreign port dumping of untreated sewage from holding tanks will also be prohibited.
One alternative to direct discharge of sewage is storage of the waste fluids until proper disposal means can be effected. However, this approach is inconvenient and impractical, especially for units which produce great quantities of waste and/or remain far from disposal facilities for extended periods of time.
Another alternative to direct discharge is chemical treatment of the sewage. However, there are obvious chemical storage and supply problems particularly in the case of large vessels remaining at sea for extended lengths of time where large quantities of chemicals are necessitated. In addition, there is danger that the chemicals may not be thoroughly effective without the assistance of comminuting or other ancillary apparatus.
Many current shipboard waste treatment systems employ physical comminutation devices and/or chemical additives, such as in U.S. Pat. No. 3,638,590 to Roberts et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,395,799 to Kurtz, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,401,115 to Meyer et al. Several problems arise in conjunction with such systems. The macerating or pulping step requires additional equipment, subject to failure or malfunction, which may result in shut down of the entire sewage treatment system. Furthermore, this additional equipment requires maintenance and occupies valuable space. In operation, the comminutor often requires ancillary apparatus in the nature of a coagulant means or supplementary fluid means for maintaining a proper influent consistency. Those requiring chemical treatment are not desirable due to costs and storage problems. Furthermore, many chemicals used to treat waste are pollutants themselves.
Other waste treatment systems such as U.S. Pat. No. 3,625,883 to Valdespino, U.S. Pat. No. 3,276,794 to Andrews, U.S. Pat. No. 3,549,592 to Wiseman, and U.S. Pat. No. 3,487,923 to Visman are undesirable for shipboard or mobile land unit applications because they involve elaborate schemes of storage tanks, intermediate tanks and lagooning tanks which not only occupy substantial space but also require extended periods of time to effect thorough treatment.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an efficient shipboard waste treatment system characterized by compactness, ease of maintenance and the absence of comminutors or stored chemical additives.
It is a further object of the present invention to receive and treat influent waste fluids having approximately 500 mg/l of suspended solids, approximately 500 mg/l of BOD and the normal concentrations of coliform organisms found in shipboard sewage, in either fresh, salt or brackish waters and produce an effluent having, at most, about 50 mg/l of suspended solids, about 50 mg/l of BOD and about 240/100 ml of total coliform.
It is still a further object of the present invention to provide a waste treatment system, for use aboard marine vessels or on mobile land units, which produces an effluent capable of being recycled through sanitary and other systems or discharged without disturbing the ecological balance.
It is an additional object of the present invention to provide a waste treatment system which is capable of substantially complete destruction of pathogenic bacteria and saprophytes and inactivation of viruses.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a waste treatment system which operates independent of ancillary treatment facilities.
According to the present invention, suspended solids and BOD are removed from influent raw sewage as follows:
a. large foreign objects and large particulate matter are separated by using an inclined screen;
b. medium size, suspended bio-waste solids that penetrate the screen are removed by centrifugation;
c. fine, colloidal, and dissolved solids are removed or rendered non-polluting by ozonation.
The removed solids at each of these stages are incinerated to a minute quantity of sterile, inert ash. During ozonation, the waste water is disinfected, reducing coliform count to low levels. It is well known in the art that ozone will destroy pathogenic bacteria and saprophytes and inactivate viruses such as poliomyelitis and entero viruses.
Apparatus designed according to the present invention is simple to operate and requires only routine maintenance. It can be started or stopped on demand, and once started, it automatically processes the waste without odor, leaving only a small quantity of inert ashes for manual periodic removal. No chemical additives are required, thereby eliminating associated handling and storage problems. The system is lightweight and compact and can be readily installed aboard a ship or mobile land unit, either a prepackaged unit or custom fitted into available spaces. Furthermore, systems designed in accordance with the present invention will easily satisfy current proposed Environmental Protection Agency standards in a compact system which can be adapted to various capacities.
The waste treatment system in accordance with the present invention may be adapted for gravity assistance to simplify its equipment and mechanics. Furthermore, tertiary treatment devices such as an activated carbon column, reverse osmosis or ultrafiltration units can be added to improve the quality and clarity of the effluent.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent when the detailed description of the preferred embodiments is considered in light of the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic of a waste treatment system according to the present invention having one centrifuge.
FIG. 2 is a schematic of a waste treatment system according to the present invention having two centrifuges.
FIGS. 3a and 3b are side elevational views, with parts broken away for clarity, of diffusers used in the present invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a system for carrying out the present invention according to one of its embodiments. Raw sewage is fed into the waste treatment system at inlet 10 and directed to influent screen means 12 which initially separates large foreign bodies and heavy solid waste matter from the waste fluid in the influent stream. Advantageously, the screen is a one-piece stainless steel mesh of heavy puncture-proof wires featuring an incline or downward curve to provide a screen which is self-cleaning and non-clogging. A particularly useful influent screen is sold under the trade name "Hydraseive." The entire flow is gravity operated and separation is actually enhanced by the motions of the vessel or vehicle, rendering the screen self-cleaning to permit continuous operation for extended periods without attention.
The solids separated from the influent are directed from influent screen means 12 to evaporator/incinerator 16. Advantageously, these solids and foreign bodies are gravity fed through conduit 13 to evaporator/incinerator 16 where they are incinerated to a minute quantity of sterile inert ash.
Evaporator/incinerator 16 operates completely automatically to accept heavy waste matter and foreign bodies from the influent screen, and, as described below, the centrifuge(s) and the ozonator system. The evaporator/incinerator is fabricated from specially selected corrosion-resistant material designed to provide long life in a high-temperature salt or fresh water environment under thermal shock conditions. The combustion chamber is fully insulated by a stable, high strength, ceramic fiber insulation blanket which provides maximum thermal efficiency, safety and economy. A commercial oil burner 17 provides the heating; the high temperatures achieved in the vapors and gases insures odorless and smokeless operation. Oil burner operation is controlled by thermal switches which insure that all waste is destroyed and that temperatures stay within safe limits. Advantageously, the evaporator/incinerator may be either a single chamber pyrolitic incinerator or a spray injection atomizing incinerator.
Following initial separation, the resultant screened waste fluid is conducted from the influent screen to surge tank 14. This may be conveniently accomplished by simple gravity feed through conduit 15. The surge tank acts as a holding tank or reservoir providing retention capacity to maintain flow through the remainder of the system at a substantially constant rate regardless of influent flow at inlet 10.
Level sensor 18 in surge tank 14 activates influent pump 22 via control panel 20 to feed the screened waste fluid through conduit 23 from the surge tank to centrifuge system 24. The centrifuge system separates suspended solids from the screened fluid to leave clarified liquid. According to one aspect of the present invention, centrifuge system 24 comprises a single centrifuge. A particularly useful centrifuge is an imperforate basket centrifuge. This centrifuge may be a substantially moderate g, continuous-liquid-flow clarifier developing about 1400 g's at the overflow level and about 2100 g's for compaction at approximately 3600 revolutions per minute.
In operation, heavy particles in the liquid are thrown out of suspension and collect within the bowl as sludge. Clear liquid flows over the edge of the bowl and is discharged to centrate pump 28 which transfers it to an ozone reactor system. Sludge clean-out is accomplished by scoop means 26 inserted into the spinning basket to force-feed the sludge to evaporator/incinerator 16 through conduit 30. Advantageously, discharge from scoop 26 may be first directed to influent screen 12. This may be accomplished by providing valve 60 on conduit 30 to direct the flow of discharge through conduit 30a, thereby cutting off access to conduit 30b, or simply by eliminating conduit 30b and providing one continuous conduit comprising sections 30 and 30a leading to influent screen means 12.
Initially passing the sludge resulting from centrifuging directly to influent screen means 12 is particularly useful due to initial surge of water through scoop 26 attributable to water remaining in centrifuge system 24. The residual water is thereby prevented from entering incinerator 16, eliminating chances for corrosion therein. This is particularly advantageous in waste treatment systems operating with or in salt water where corrosion in the evaporator/incinerator can be a critical problem. Accordingly, solids which have been partially compacted by the centrifuge roll down influent screen 12 after which they are fed to evaporator/incinerator 16 as described above. Liquid accompanying this sludge passes through the screen and is reintroduced to the system along with the screened waste fluid.
Clarified liquid leaving the centrifuge system is fed to ozonator system 33. This may be accomplished by means of centrate pump 28 or it may be accomplished in a mechanically simple fashion by positioning centrifuge 24 above the ozonator system in order that clarified liquid may flow into ozonator system 33 via gravity attraction. With the latter arrangement, centrate pump 28 is eliminated.
Ozonator system 33 consists of two basic units, ozone generator 31 and ozone reactor tank or contact column 32. Preferably, the ozone generator employs the corona discharge (silent arc) principle of ozone generation and supplies ozone or an ozone/air mixture (hereinafter referred to simply as ozone) to contact column 32. The ozone contact functions as a holding and mixing tank to retain the clarified liquid for reaction with ozone. Ozone, renown for its purifying properties, reacts with small solids and other pollutants in the liquid to produce a substantially disinfected effluent.
Advantageously, ozone reactor tank 32 comprises at least one tall cylinder filled with clarified liquid introduced substantially near its top. Ozone is introduced through diffusers positioned near the base of the column so that the ozone bubbles up through the column and entraps small solids and pollutants with which it comes in contact. These entrapped solids and pollutants, i.e., those that either are engulfed within the bubbles or adhere to the surface of the bubbles, are carried to the surface. Space is provided at the top of the contact column 32 to allow the entrapped elements to form a foam which is capable of easy disposal into evaporator/incinerator 16 through conduit 35.
As discussed above with reference to sludge clean-out of centrifuge system 24, the foam may be initially transmitted to influent screen means 12 before passage to evaporator/incinerator 16. This may be accomplished by orienting valve 66 such that the foam flows through conduit 35a into influent screen means 12. Alternatively, conduit 35 may be deleted altogether so that foam travels only through conduit 35a, thus eliminating need for valve 66. Since the foam will not be heavily laden with liquid, it need not be acted upon by the entire influent screen. Therefore, conduit 35a need not introduce the foam at the top of influent screen means 12. Advantageously, conduit 35a may be connected to influent screen 12 at any convenient point on its housing such that conduit 35a has a downward slope to provide gravity feed of the foam into influent screen means 12.
Advantageously, the bottom of the ozone contact column may be formed with cone 40 (FIG. 3a) and a diffuser positioned substantially at its cusp to enhance diffusion of ozone throughout the column and prevent static build-up of solids where the ozone could not otherwise reach. In a particularly useful embodiment, the diffuser may be either a stainless steel mushroom diffuser 42 or a teflon o-ring diffuser 44 or both. Flow through diffuser 42 or diffuser 44, or both, can be regulated by any convenient means such as valves 56 and 58, respectively, while disinfected effluent can be withdrawn through drain port 46 at cusp of the cone.
In another useful embodiment, contact column 32 may be a closed-bottom cylinder having a slanted stainless steel disc diffuser 48 near its bottom as shown in FIG. 3b. The ozone is forced into the bottom at inlet 50 and bubbled through diffuser 48, thereby effecting total diffusion and preventing static build-up of solids. Disinfected effluent can be withdrawn through drain port means 52 near the lowest point of diffuser 48.
In still another useful embodiment, ozone reaction column 32 may be packed with packing means 64 in the form of Pall Rings, Berl Saddles or other suitable packings to enhance the performance of the ozone reactor column and generate a clearer effluent. The clarifying effect of the packings has been attributed to the fact that these elements further diffuse the ozone bubbles, dividing them into smaller ones, and provide a surface area to accommodate the reaction of ozone with fine and colloidal solids in the liquid. The packings 64 should not be too large as the ozonation process may be adversely affected since the ozone bubbles may cling to their surfaces and coalesce into larger bubbles which are less effective for entrapping solids and disinfecting the mixture.
According to another aspect of the present invention, shown in FIG. 2, the waste treatment system includes second centrifuge means 54 positioned after first centrifuge means 24. Clarified liquid leaving centrifuge 24 is fed to centrifuge 54 by centrate pump 28. Centrifuge 54 can be a substantially high-g fine particle centrifuge such as a disk or scroll centrifuge for removal of fine suspended particles to ensure proper suspended solid counts in the effluent. When a scroll centrifuge is used, sludge clean-out is simple since these devices are inherently self-cleaning. Where a disk centrifuge is employed, sludge clean-out can be simply accomplished by connecting hydraulic pressure means to the centrifuge casing and forcing sludge through an outlet in the casing from which the sludge may be passed to screen 12 for removal of excess water before passing to incinerator 16. The further clarified liquid from second centrifuge means 54 is directed to ozonator system 33 either by a second centrate pump 28 or via simple gravity feed resulting from the arrangement of equipment as described above with reference to the one centrifuge system.
The quality and clarity of the effluent may be further enhanced by subjecting the treated effluent from the ozonator to tertiary treatment as shown in FIG. 2. Means for accomplishing tertiary treatment may be in the form of activated charcoal or carbon, reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration or other suitable tertiary treatment systems. Furthermore, these devices may be combined in series to produce an effluent having the desired particulate concentrations.
The system according to the present invention may be automatically operated and governed by a control console comprising a completely integrated, functional arrangement of controls, indicators and safety devices, providing rapid push-button startup/shutdown. Visual displays for status monitoring and fault isolation can be provided, as well as individual push buttons to permit independent startup and shutdown of components for fault isolation and checkout. Automatic controls can be adjusted by the operator to provide optimum performance and economy.
The primary control functions are:
i. System startup;
ii. Centrifuge sludge removal;
iii. Evaporator/incinerator burner operation;
iv. System failure alarm and shutdown.
A pushbutton starts the basket centrifuge and ozone generator and initiates the surge tank pump-out and evaporator/incinerator burner cycles. Surge tank pump-out is controlled by high and low level switches. The surge tank pump-out rate corresponds to the system design flow rate.
The sludge removal from the centrifuge(s) is completely automatic. The clean-out of the basket centrifuge can be initiated by an adjustable timer set at a controlled periodic rate. At the start of the clean-out cycle, the surge tank pump may be shut off to stop the flow of sewage into the centrifuge(s). After clean-out, the surge tank pump is reactivated. The clean-out cycle takes less than 20 seconds. Clean-out of a disk centrifuge is performed hydraulically while scroll centrifuges are inherently self-cleaning.
The evaporator/incinerator is started by an adjustable timer at a controlled periodic rate. An incinerator pan thermal switch is used to shut down the burner when the sludge has been reduced to ashes. A high temperature thermal switch cycles the oil burner to prevent overheating of the combustion chamber.
The system master alarm, including indicator lights and a horn, will alert the operator of a failure and automatically shut down the failed component. The alarm is initiated by:
i. A failure (open circuit breaker) in the control alarm circuit;
ii. Loss of flow or overfull condition in the surge tank;
iii. Reduction in speed of basket centrifuge;
iv. Loss of air pressure, overheating in ozone generator;
v. Oil burner misfire or flame out.
Individual warning lights and circuit breakers are provided to facilitate troubleshooting. The control system requires a minimum number of operator control manipulations and provides indicator visibility under ambient illumination. Acceptable indicator symbols have been emphasized in the presentation of operational information.
Normal operation of this system is completely automatic and requires no maintenance except for periodic ash removal. The ash is sterile, odorless and lightweight making its removal an unobjectionable task.
It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the above-described embodiments are merely illustrative and that various modifications can be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US782021 *||Nov 3, 1903||Feb 7, 1905||Siemens Ag||Process of sterilizing water by means of ozonized air.|
|US3276994 *||Mar 9, 1966||Oct 4, 1966||Charles W Andrews||Sewage treatment|
|US3523891 *||Feb 19, 1969||Aug 11, 1970||Purity Control Inc||Electrolytic sewage treatment system and process|
|US3622508 *||Aug 19, 1970||Nov 23, 1971||Komline Sanderson Eng Corp||Sludge disposal|
|US3658590 *||Feb 27, 1970||Apr 25, 1972||Huebner James A||Automatic vehicle washing apparatus|
|US3732163 *||Nov 3, 1971||May 8, 1973||Gen Electric||Process and apparatus for the ozone treatment of a liquid material|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4156648 *||May 30, 1978||May 29, 1979||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Flotation device with pretreatment|
|US4193869 *||Feb 21, 1978||Mar 18, 1980||Milton Brucker||Wastewater and wastewater solid processing system|
|US4197200 *||Aug 29, 1978||Apr 8, 1980||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Shipboard blackwater physical/chemical treatment system|
|US4214887 *||Nov 8, 1978||Jul 29, 1980||Ozodyne, Inc.||Sewage and waste water treatment|
|US4233152 *||Mar 19, 1979||Nov 11, 1980||Atlantic Richfield Company||Apparatus and method for the treatment of liquors|
|US4251367 *||Jan 25, 1979||Feb 17, 1981||Waste Conversion Technology, Inc.||Wastewater treatment|
|US4277341 *||Sep 6, 1979||Jul 7, 1981||Schramm, Inc.||Water treatment discharge means|
|US4409908 *||Sep 13, 1979||Oct 18, 1983||Udyma Petr G||Method for thermal decontamination of waste waters|
|US4687584 *||Aug 19, 1985||Aug 18, 1987||Industrial Innovations, Inc.||Sludge remover and processor|
|US4895649 *||Dec 5, 1988||Jan 23, 1990||Brandt & Associates, Inc.||Apparatus for processing coolant|
|US5053140 *||Jul 26, 1989||Oct 1, 1991||American Water Purification, Inc.||Process and apparatus for removing impurities from water used in food processing utilizing a mixture of ozone and air|
|US5178755 *||Feb 20, 1992||Jan 12, 1993||Estr Inc.||UV-enhanced ozone wastewater treatment system|
|US5324666 *||Apr 8, 1989||Jun 28, 1994||Siepmann Friedrich W||Process for determining oxidizable substances contained in an aqueous sample liquid|
|US5387278 *||Jul 20, 1992||Feb 7, 1995||Grumman Aerospace Corporation||Air-liquid separator assembly and system|
|US5474749 *||Nov 3, 1994||Dec 12, 1995||Yuugen Kaisha Ohl Hydrodynamics Laboratory||Ozone reaction device|
|US5645608 *||Apr 17, 1996||Jul 8, 1997||Cooper; Theodore R.||Cold water wash method|
|US5763382 *||Jan 3, 1996||Jun 9, 1998||Cyclo3Pss Textile Systems, Inc.||Cold water wash formula|
|US6006387 *||Nov 30, 1995||Dec 28, 1999||Cyclo3Pss Textile Systems, Inc.||Cold water ozone disinfection|
|US6115862 *||Dec 27, 1999||Sep 12, 2000||Cyclo3Pss Textile Systems, Inc.||Cold water ozone disinfection|
|US6190566 *||Jun 23, 1998||Feb 20, 2001||Steven N. Kolber||Treatment of waste produced by farm animals raised under confined conditions|
|US6207065 *||Oct 7, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Integrated liquid discharge system|
|US6458398||Sep 22, 2000||Oct 1, 2002||Eco Pure Food Safety Systems, Inc.||Cold water disinfection of foods|
|US6811705||Feb 21, 2002||Nov 2, 2004||Hydroxyl Systems Inc.||Wastewater treatment system|
|US7005077 *||Apr 15, 2005||Feb 28, 2006||Brenner Samuel L||Shipboard human waste treatment for removing solids|
|US7371323||Aug 11, 2005||May 13, 2008||Spielman Rick B||System and method for reducing wastewater contaminants|
|US7481937 *||Jan 19, 2005||Jan 27, 2009||Heavy Industry Technology Solutions, Llc||Methods and systems for treating wastewater using ozone activated flotation|
|US7534357||Mar 17, 2006||May 19, 2009||Navalis Environmental Systems, Llc||Dual-train wastewater reclamation and treatment system|
|US7704390 *||Nov 18, 2003||Apr 27, 2010||Ionz Bluewater Solutions, Inc.||Wastewater treatment system|
|US8475718||May 6, 2010||Jul 2, 2013||Environmental Purification, Llc||Method and apparatus for controlling fecal odors|
|US8691094 *||Nov 4, 2010||Apr 8, 2014||Huge Asia Limited||Method and system for treating domestic sewage and organic garbage|
|US8784739||Aug 30, 2007||Jul 22, 2014||Environmental Purification, Llc||Method and apparatus for controlling fecal odors|
|US9017606||Jun 10, 2014||Apr 28, 2015||Environmental Purification, Llc||Method and apparatus for controlling odors|
|US9265389||Mar 23, 2015||Feb 23, 2016||Environmental Purification, Llc||Method and apparatus for controlling odors|
|US20020117458 *||Feb 21, 2002||Aug 29, 2002||Hydroxyl Systems Inc.||Wastewater treatment system|
|US20040099607 *||Nov 18, 2003||May 27, 2004||Leffler Charles E.||Wastewater treatment system|
|US20060157424 *||Jan 19, 2005||Jul 20, 2006||Heavy Industry Technology Solutions, Llc||Methods and systems for treating wastewater using ozone activated flotation|
|US20070158276 *||Jan 9, 2007||Jul 12, 2007||Navalis Environmental Systems, Llc||Method and Apparatus for Sequenced Batch Advanced Oxidation Wastewater Treatment|
|US20080063991 *||Aug 30, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||Sifers Don S||Method and apparatus for controlling fecal odors|
|US20080257806 *||Sep 11, 2006||Oct 23, 2008||Silvano Rossato||Method and Apparatus for Treating Wastes, Particularly of a Biological and Domestic Origin|
|US20090166280 *||May 9, 2008||Jul 2, 2009||Beijing Jinaohuarong Science And Technology Co., Ltd.||Wastewater purifying system in hospitals|
|US20090218282 *||Mar 20, 2006||Sep 3, 2009||Navalis Environmental Systems, Llc||Dual-Train Wastewater Reclamation and Treatment System|
|US20090223882 *||May 13, 2009||Sep 10, 2009||Navalis Environmental Systems, Llc||Dual-Train Wastewater Reclamation and Treatment System|
|US20100221145 *||May 6, 2010||Sep 2, 2010||Ann Rogers Business Trust||Method and apparatus for controlling fecal odors|
|US20110185516 *||Mar 25, 2011||Aug 4, 2011||Randy Zorn||Ozone Laundry Systems|
|US20110315626 *||Nov 4, 2010||Dec 29, 2011||Huge Asia Limited||Method and system for treating domestic sewage and organic garbage|
|US20120031823 *||Aug 22, 2009||Feb 9, 2012||Hamann Ag||Apparatus for the Treatment of Wastewater|
|EP0014276A1 *||Jan 12, 1979||Aug 20, 1980||Robert H. Nealy||Integrated sewage treatment system|
|EP0104648A2 *||Sep 27, 1983||Apr 4, 1984||Phillips Petroleum Company||Waste water treatment|
|EP0104648A3 *||Sep 27, 1983||Mar 6, 1985||Phillips Petroleum Company||Waste water treatment|
|EP0242533A1 *||Feb 23, 1987||Oct 28, 1987||Ozonia AG||Method and apparatus for conditioning feed-water by means of ozone for reverse osmosis|
|WO1991001944A1 *||Jul 18, 1990||Feb 21, 1991||American Water Purification, Inc.||Process and apparatus for recycling food processing water|
|WO1994002230A1 *||Jul 20, 1993||Feb 3, 1994||Grumman Aerospace Corporation||Air-liquid separator assembly and system|
|WO1999067174A1 *||Jun 22, 1999||Dec 29, 1999||Kolber Steven N||Treatment of waste produced by farm animals raised under confined conditions|
|WO2003053858A1 *||Dec 13, 2002||Jul 3, 2003||C.G.E.A.. Onyx||Method for treating raw condensates derived from sludge drying and installation therefor|
|U.S. Classification||210/706, 210/721, 210/781, 210/760, 210/806, 210/221.2, 210/195.1, 210/151, 210/764|
|International Classification||C02F9/00, C02F1/78|
|Cooperative Classification||C02F2201/001, C02F2303/24, C02F9/00, C02F1/78|
|European Classification||C02F9/00, C02F1/78|