|Publication number||US4069177 A|
|Application number||US 05/697,736|
|Publication date||Jan 17, 1978|
|Filing date||Jun 21, 1976|
|Priority date||Jun 21, 1976|
|Publication number||05697736, 697736, US 4069177 A, US 4069177A, US-A-4069177, US4069177 A, US4069177A|
|Original Assignee||Theodore Smith|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (1), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (58), Classifications (17)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to improved water insoluble alkali metal carboxylate salts of starch-acrylonitrile graft copolymers which are produced by saponifying starch acrylonitrile graft copolymers with a base in an aqueous alcoholic medium. The invention represents an improvement over my previous patent U.S. Pat. No. 3,661,815.
Graft copolymers of starch-polyacrylonitrile per se are known as well as are methods for their preparation.
Thus, it is known that acrylonitrile can be grafted on starch using ceric salts as catalysts to form starch-acrylonitrile graft copolymers. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,922,768. Such graft copolymers can also be prepared by the reaction of acrylonitrile with pre-irradiated starch which is prepared by irradiation of starch with gamma rays or an electron beam. See Reyes, Clark, Comas, Russell, and Rist, Nuclear Applications 6, 509-517 (1969). In such graft copolymers the starch serves as a backbone or building block on which the acrylonitrile is grafted and therefore the starch need be present in only very small proportions with respect to the polyacrylonitrile moiety.
After the starch polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer is produced to make it valuable as a water insoluble material having the ability to absorb large amounts of water, it is saponified. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,425,971 is directed to saponification of a graft copolymer in an aqueous potassium hydroxide solution.
Compositions which can readily absorb large amounts of water are valuable for many uses. For example, such substances can be used in manufacturing products such as disposable diapers, tampons, sanitary napkins, paper towels and in numerous hospital or nursing home applications such as bed sheets, application to gauzes or other wound dressing materials, or the like. In addition, such substances can be used in other areas of industry where water absorbing and retention is important. For example, it can be mixed with wood pulp or the like, or added to a soil in order to increase the water retention capability of the soil.
Ideally, water absorbing compositions should not only absorb as much water as possible and therefore be highly efficient in this respect, it must also not have the property of "thinning" after exposure to solutions that have a high salt and enzyme content. This is a very important consideration in that many of the body fluids which such a composition will come in contact with when used in disposable diapers, or sanitary napkins, have both a high salt content and a high enzyme content. Appreciable contact with both salts and enzymes will allow many water absorbing copolymers to become less viscous and even run with the water retention ability reduced after a short period of time. Thus, it is very important that not only the composition have high water absorbence capability, but it must also not be adversely affected so that it will thin upon contact with salt and enzyme containing liquids.
In addition, an ideal composition must be one which will have the ability to adhere to fibers of, for example, paper towels or other material upon which it is coated. Most graft copolymers, especially of starch polyacrylonitrile do not have a property of good adherence to a substrate material.
In addition, primarily for aesthetic purposes so that they will not interfere with the looks and quality of a product in which such water absorbing compositions are applied, a good polymer should provide a clear product when in dispersion form.
The object of this invention is to provide a starch polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer which has an unusually high water absorbence capacity, i.e., capable of absorbing from about 800 to as much as 1000 times its weight of water.
Another object of this invention is to provide a starch polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer which is capable of absorbing up to as much as 100 times or greater, of its weight of body fluids.
Still another object of this invention is to provide a starch polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer which has significantly improved characteristics in terms of improved performance in the presence of ionic and enzyme containing fluids in that the polymer paste does not thin upon standing.
A still further object of this invention is to provide a graft copolymer which, when in wet form, will form a paste like material which has good adhesion properties to a substrate material.
Yet another object of this invention is to provide a graft copolymer which has a high acrylonitrile content and yet which in a wet form dispersion is a clear product which will not interfere with the aesthetic characteristics of a substrate material to which it is applied.
The method and means of accomplishing at least all of the above stated objects will become apparent from the detailed description of the invention which follows.
This invention relates to an alkali metal carboxylate salt of a polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer produced by saponifying a starch polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer, with the copolymer being produced from starch by a step-wise grafting procedure. Starch is reacted with a portion of a predetermined amount of acrylonitrile in the presence of a free radical initiator to provide a partially grafted copolymer, and thereafter said partially grafted copolymer is reacted with the remaining portion of a predetermined amount of acrylonitrile in the presence of additional amounts of free radical initiator. Improved characteristics are also obtained wherein the starch, prior to copolymerization is treated starch which has been treated by one or more of the following procedures: Thinning, cooking and defatting.
As heretofore briefly mentioned, it has been found that the water insoluble alkali metal carboxylate salts of starch acrylonitrile graft copolymers which are produced by saponifying starch acrylonitrile graft copolymers with a base in an aqueous alcoholic medium are significantly improved with respect to all the properties heretofore mentioned, wherein the grafting procedure is a step-wise grafting procedure. Step-wise grafting will be explained in more detail below with reference to the examples. The term, however, as will be apparent from the examples below, is utilized to mean adding a portion of the predetermined amount of acrylonitrile to the starch material and reacting them together to polymerize in the presence of a free radical initiator, such as ceric nitrate or ceric ammonium nitrate, and allowing the reaction to go until it has reached equilibrium conditions, i.e., the temperature has stabilized without any further exothermic reaction as evidenced by an increase in temperature, and thereafter adding the remaining portion of the acrylonitrile along with additional amounts of free radical initiator and allowing the reaction to again react until completion of the reaction as evidenced by constancy of the reaction temperature. Thereafter, preferably a hold time is employed in order to insure complete reaction.
As also heretofore mentioned, the product is improved even further if the starch which is employed is first treated by thinning, and/or defatting, and/or precooking. However, an improved product is obtained even if the starch is not thinned. cooked or defatted as long as step-wise grafting is employed. Thus, the starting starch can be the readily commercially available pearl starch which has not been thinned, cooked or defatted. Thinned starches are generally made by acid thinning, so that the cooked starch paste has a reduced viscosity; such starches are available in a wide viscosity range. A defatted starch is a pearl starch that has been treated to reduce fat content from 0.5% to about 0.1%. Precooking as the term is utilized herein, refers to the addition of water to the starch material and heating it up to a temperature near boiling in order to paste the starch.
It is not known why thinning, precooking or defatting, or for that matter step-wise grafting, improves the product. While applicant does not wish to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the thinning of the starch is an important factor, in that it allows viscosity control of the starch during any precooking which might occur and during the subsequent grafting step. It is believed that precooking of the starch, as described hereinbefore and as further described in the examples hereinafter allows grafting of the acrylonitrile into the whole starch mass rather than just grafting onto the periphery of the starch granule. In addition, there is a different type of grafting that occurs rather than when granular non-cooked starch is utilized as described in my previous patent, 3,661,815, in that utilization of a cooked starch allows more free radical sites for initiation of the grafting procedure. Step-wise grafting, it is believed, overcomes the undesired effects of the exothermic reaction wherein grafting with a high ratio of acrylonitrile occurs, as well as aids in keeping the water volume down to a workable level for the final saponification step. High temperatures should be avoided during grafting in that it reduces the functionality of the product and by utilization of the step-wise grafting, this is controlled.
As will be apparent from the examples below, step-wise grafting can be employed utilizing two or more steps. For example, three-step grafting is satisfactory. However, of course, economics enters into the overall processing picture and generally two steps are satisfactory to obtain maximum benefit from step-wise grafting without significantly increasing the economics of the process.
As heretofore mentioned, the saponificatin of starch polyacrylonitrile copolymers is known. Therefore, it will not be necessary to provide a detailed description of saponification. The portion of my previous patent, 3,661,815, describing saponification in an aqueous alcoholic medium is incorporated herein by reference. However, certain modifications in the saponification procedure have been found to be advantageous for the present process. Saponification can occur by reflux saponification in an unsealed vessel or pressurized saponification in a sealed vessel. Suitable saponification conditions for the practice of this invention are as follows:
______________________________________SAPONIFICATION CONDITIONS Practical Preferred Range Range______________________________________Temperature closed vessel 90-98° C. 90-95° C. Open Vessel (reflux condi- 76-80° C. tions (reflux conditions)Time: Closed vessel 1-2 hours 90 minutes open vessel 4-6 hours 4 hoursGrams of sodium hydroxide per100 ml. aqueous alcoholicsaponifying solution 3.5-5.0 4.0Volume (ml) of saponifyingsolution per gram of starchacrylonitrile copolymers 14-15 15% of water in alcoholicsaponifying solution 45-65 55______________________________________
The conditions for the step-wise grafting procedure will be readily apparent from the many examples given below. However, as a guideline, the presently best known conditions for grafting starch with acrylonitrile by a two or three step grafting procedure are as follows:
______________________________________STEP-WISE GRAFTING CONDITIONSGrafting Time Time(2) step (a) 1st step 30 minutes(b) 2nd step 2 hours(3) step (a) 1st step 30 minutes(b) 2nd step 30 minutes(c) 3rd step 2 hours______________________________________ PracticalGrafting Temperature Range Optimum______________________________________(2) step (a) 1st step 58-62° C. 60° C(b) 2nd Step 58-62° C. 60° CStarch: Acrylonitrile MoleRatio 1:6 to 1:12 1:9 to 1:12 best 1:9StarchesDefatted:(a) Thinned viscosity 65-80 Buel 75-80(b) Cook 10 min. at 92-95° C.(c) % fat 0.05-0.12%Pearl:(a) Thinned, viscosity 65-80 Buel 75-80 Buel(b) Cooked 10 min. at 92-95° C.______________________________________
With regard to the table showing the saponification conditions, for convenience of description hereinafter, the volume in milliliters of saponifying solution per gram of starch acrylonitrile polymer will hereinafter be abbreviated as "Factor". With regard to the table on the grafting procedure, it can be seen that in the second and subsequent grafts, best results are obtained wherein the temperature does not rise above 62° C. Preferably the temperature is within the range from 58° to 62° C with the most preferred temperature being 60° C. The grafting time for the step-wise grafting procedure specified herein are generally minimum times which are desirable to use considering the economics of the process. Longer times could be employed however, the economics are insufficient to make them usable when considering the little additional grafting which will occur. The preferred starch acrylonitrile mole ratio range is from 1:9 and 1:12 with the best results being at 1:9. It has been found that the 1:9 ratio starch to acrylonitrile copolymer is the most resistant to enzymatic attach when in contact with body fluids containing enzymes.
As heretofore mentioned, a product of this invention has surprisingly high fluid absorption characteristics. In the grafting process, it has been found that the product made by grafting starch with acrylonitrile can be isolated and then grafted again with additional amounts of acrylonitrile in a step-wise grafting procedure employing two, three or more steps. This procedure of step-wise grafting permits the making of products with a starch acrylonitrile molar ratio as high as 1:12. This is normally not possible with a one-step grafting procedure since the grafting of starch with acrylonitrile gives a high exothermic reaction, with the increased temperature destroying the functionality of the polymer. In addition to make a product with a starch acrylonitrile molar ratio as high as 1:12 in one step would require excessive amounts of water in the reaction mixture in order to absorb the heat of reaction. In contrast, in step-wise grafting the amount of water needed is considerably reduced. The graft copolymer can be isolated and then saponified later in an aqueous methanolic sodium hydroxide solution in accord with the manner previously mentioned herein. Alternatively, the copolymer slurry resulting from step-wise grafting procedure can be saponified by adding additional water methanol and sodium hydroxide, immediately.
The following examples are offered to further illustrate but not limit the invention.
A slurry of 24.3 grams of granular pearl starch (0.15 mole on a dry solids basis) in 200 milliliter of water was cooled to 20° C. Acrylonitrile (35.2 grams, starch to Acrylonitrile mole ratio of 1:4.5), and 13.5 milliliter of ceric nitrate M/10 ceric ion in N/1 nitric acid were added in order that grafting would occur. A temperature rise to 58° C. occurred in ten minutes and thereafter the temperature of the mass was maintained at 60° C. for a total grafting time of 30 minutes. The slurry was cooled to 30° C. and the copolymer was grafted a second time by adding 100 milliliter of water, 35.8 grams of acrylonitrile to provide again a starch to acrylonitrile mole ratio of 1:9 and 18 milliliter of ceric nitrate solution was added. After the reaction exothermed (to 51° C. in 36 minutes) the slurry was heated to 60° C. for a total grafting time of 2 hours. The copolymer product was washed and dried. In similar manner, starch to acrylonitrile graft copolymers with starch to acrylonitrile mole ratio of 1:9 and 1:12 were made up using a three step grafting procedure by grafting 1:3 and 1:4 starch to acrylonitrile mole ratios per grafting step, respectively.
Pearl starch was defatted by continuous extraction of the starch with 85% methanol and 15% water solution, at reflux temperatures. The starch was thinned with hydrochloric acid during the extraction of the fat. The percent fat was 0.05% and the viscosity was 65 Buel. The defatted thinned corn starch (24.0 grams) was slurried in 250 milliliters of water. This slurry was heated in a glass flask by a hot water bath to temperatures within the range of 92° C to 95° C and held at that temperature for 10 minutes. The starch was now a cooked starch and was thereafter cooled to 20° C and 100 milliliters of water and 35.8 grams of acrylonitrile as well as 15 milliliters of ceric nitrate free radical initiator were added in that order. After the reaction temperature leveled off at 55° C the slurry was heated to 60° C and maintained there for a total grafting time of 30 minutes. The mass was cooled to 30° C and the second step of a step-wise grafting procedure was carried out by adding to the slurry, 75 milliliters of water, 35.8 grams of acrylonitrile and 18 milliliters of ceric nitrate free radical initiator, in the order mentioned herein. After the reaction exothermed and leveled off at 55° C., the reaction mixture was heated to 60° C. and maintained there for 2 hours to allow the second portion of the step-wise grafting to occur.
Thereafter, the completely grafted product was used directly in a final saponification step by adding water, methanol and sodium hydroxide in a manner previously disclosed herein in the table labeled "Saponifying Conditions".
The thinning of the starch gave a lower viscosity which was found desirable in both the cooking step and the grafting step. Unthinned starch has a tendency to provide a difficultly workable high viscosity during cooking and especially in the starch grafting steps. A satisfactory viscosity range has been found to be 65 to 80 Buel. The Buel viscosity was determined by slurring 4.5 grams, on a dry solids basis, of starch in 10 milliliter of water and thereafter adding 90 milliliter of a 1% sodium hydroxide solution to the slurry with stirring for three minutes. The beaker containing the slurry was then put in a water bath at 25° C. for 30 minutes and the paste was poured into a Buel funnel fitted with an orifice. The milliliter of paste collecting in 70 seconds is termed the Buel viscosity.
A. Isolated Dried Starch Graft Copolymer, 12 grams, was added to a 7 ounce pressure vessel containing 180 milliliters of a mixture made of 7.2 grams of sodium hydroxide and 96.4 milliliters of water and 79.9 milliliters of anhydrous methanol. The vessel was sealed and placed in a water bath at 75° C. The water bath was heated to 95° C. and the vessel was shaken several times to prevent the settling of the product until the contents had thickened adequately. The heating was continued for 90 minutes and then the reaction container was removed and cooled. The saponified product was removed from the vessel and blended to a uniform paste in a blender. Purification of the saponified product by removal of the water, ammonia, excess sodium hydroxide and any soluble salts resulting from the neutralization was accomplished by a series of a product treatment with anhydrous methanol. The final product was neutralized within the PH range of 6.0 to 8.0 with glacial acetic acid, was filtered and dried at 60° C. in a vacuum oven.
The volume of the saponifying liquid was determined by a numerical factor, previously mentioned hereinbefore. That factor was 12 (grams on a dry basis solids of graft copolymer times the numerical factor) 15 to provide the volume of saponifying liquid here 180 milliliter.
B. Non-isolated graft copolymer was saponified in a closed vessel at a pressure within the range of 25 to 30 pounds per square inch as follows: 47.6 grams of slurry (25.22% solids, 12 grams of solids) was mixed with 14.4 grams of a 50% sodium hydroxide solution, 55.8 milliliters of water and 81 milliliters of methanol in a 7 ounce pressure vessel. This mixture had the same composition as described under example 3(a). It was treated and purified as shown in Example 3(a).
C. Graft copolymer slurry saponification by reflux conditions.
The entire batch of graft copolymer (278 grams of slurry, 47.9 grams of solids) were mixed with 57.4 grams of 50% sodium hydroxide, 150 milliliters of water and 305 milliliters of methanol in a one liter, three necked flask fitted with a stirrer thermometer and a reflux condenser. The flask was heated in a hot water bath at a reflux temperature within the range of 77° to 79° C. for a period of four hours. The saponified mixture was cooled and the product was purified with anhydrous methanol. The composition of the liquid of the saponification phase was 4.0% sodium hydroxide, 55% water and 45% methanol.
In these examples a granular pearl starch was grafted with acrylonitrile in a three step step-wise grafting procedure. The grafting procedure was exactly the same as that provided in Example 1. The starch to acrylonitrile mole ratio for each grafting step was 1:3 to provide a total molar ratio of starch to acrylonitrile of 1:9. The samples of the slurry were withdrawn at each step and saponified. Saponification of the examples 4, 5, and 6 were in accord with the following table:
TABLE 1a______________________________________ Saponi-Grams of ficationSolids % Sodium Type,(Product) Factor Hydroxide % Water Example______________________________________Example 4 15 13.3 4.0 50 3BExample 5 15 13.3 4.5 50 3BExample 6 15 13.3 5.0 50 3B______________________________________
The following table summarizes the grafting conditions for examples 4, 5 and 6 and shows the liquid uptake of the resulting polymer using water and a 0.4% sodium chloride solution. A 0.4% sodium chloride solution approximates the liquid uptake for human urine.
TABLE 1b______________________________________ Liquid Uptake ml/g of Starch:An ProductGrafting (acrylonitrile) 0.4%Step Molar Ratio Water Sodium Chloride______________________________________Example 4 1 1:3 110 64Example 5 2 1:6 180 76Example 6 3 1:9 270 96______________________________________
In these examples, granular defatted pearl starch (0.08% fat) was grafted in the same manner as in Examples 4-6. Samples of the slurry were removed at each step-wise grafting step and saponification under the conditions specified below occurred:
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________GRAFTING AND SAPONIFICATION CONDITIONS FOR EXAMPLES 7-9 Saponi- Graft- Starch:AN % fication Liquid Uptake ing Molar Sodium % type, yield 4% SodiumEx. Steps Ratio Grams Factor Hydroxide Water example grams Water Chloride__________________________________________________________________________7 1 1:3 15 13.3 4.0 50 3B 22 131 568 2 1:6 15 13.3 4.5 50 3B 23 202 729 3 1:9 15 13.3 5.0 50 3B 24 350 86__________________________________________________________________________
Employed in these examples was a defatted, thinned granular pearl starch which was grafted with acrylonitrile by a three-step grafting procedure, as defined in Example 1. The product was isolated, washed, dried and saponified. The starch acrylonitrile molar ratio, the grams of product employed, the factor as previously defined herein, and the saponification conditions as well as the liquid uptake for both water and a 0.4% sodium chloride solution for this product, are shown in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Starch:AN % Saponi- Liquid Uptake ml/gr product Molar Sodium % fication gram 0.4% SodiumEx. Ratio Grams Factor Hydroxide Water type product Water Chloride__________________________________________________________________________10 1:91 15 13.3 4.5 55 3C 21.9 310 10011 1:91 15 13.3 4.5 55 3C 23.0 325 86__________________________________________________________________________
The percent fat for the defatted starch was 0.05% and the Buel viscosity was 65.
In this example, granular pearl starch was grafted by a three step grafting procedure as shown in Example 1. The final product after the three step grafting procedure was isolated, washed and dried. Again, the starch to acrylonitrile mole ratio, the conditions of saponification of the polymer, and the liquid uptake of the final product are shown in Table 4.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________ Liquid Uptake Ml/Starch:AN % Saponi- g of product: Molar Sodium % fication Grams % 0.4% SodiumEx. Ratio Grams Factor Hydroxide Water Type Product N2 Water Chloride__________________________________________________________________________12 1:9 15 13.3 4.5 50 3C 22.0 5.1 309 84__________________________________________________________________________
In these examples, a granular thinned defatted starch was grafted by the three step grafting procedure previously specified herein in Example 1, at a 1:3 starch to acrylonitrile molar ratio per step. Saponification conditions were varied in that an increase in the factor from 13.3 to 14 and 15 was employed and an increase in water of from 50% to 55% during saponification was employed. This was found to improve the product somewhat in terms of its liquid uptake. Table 5 summarizes the data for these examples.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________ Liquid Uptake ml/gStarch:AN % Saponi- of product: Molar Sodium % fication Grams % 0.4% SodiumEx. Ratio Grams Factor Hydroxide Water Type Product N2 Water Chloride__________________________________________________________________________13 1:9.sup.(1) 12 13.3 3.5 50 3A 17.7 5.05 262 7514 12 13.3 4.0 50 3A 18.2 5.6 275 8915 12 13.3 4.5 50 3A 18.2 5.0 250 8416 12 14 4.0 50 3A -- 5.0 270 8417 12 14 4.0 55 3A -- 5.1 380 9718 12 15 4.0 55 3A -- 5.2 400 97__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.(1) Defatted starch (0.09%), thinned (Buel 72), and preswelled at 60° C. for 1/2 hour.
A graft copolymer which was made by two and three-step grafting procedures. Starch employed was a granular defatted, thinned and granular pearl starch. In examples 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23, the starches were pre-swelled at 60° C. In examples 24 and 25, the starches were not pre-swelled. Pre-swelling of the starch did not seem to improve the final product. From the data summarized in table 6 below, it appears that the use of a 55% water solution during saponification increased the liquid uptake of the final product. The use of defatted starches gaves a somewhat improved final product over the use of non-defatted pearl starch.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Starch Liquid Uptake Starch:AN % Saponi- ml/g of product: % thin- pre- graft Molar fact- Sodium % fication Grams % 0.4%Ex. fat ned swelled steps Ratio grams or Hydrox. Water type Product N2 H2 O Nacl Urine__________________________________________________________________________19 0.09 + + 2 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 18.3 5.0 500 110 10020 0.09 + + 2 1:9 12 15 4.0 50 3A 18.5 4.9 360 100 10021 0.09 + + 3 1:12 12 15 4.0 55 3A 18.4 5.1 530 11022 0.09 + + 3 1:12 12 15 4.0 50 3A 18.0 5.1 412 10023 0.5 - + 2 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.5 5.3 330 9424 0.5 - - 2 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.1 5.6 378 9625 0.09 + - 2 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.1 5.2 480 110__________________________________________________________________________
No thinning of the urine tested product of examples 19 and 20 occurred after 24 hours showing that the product seemed to exemplify a resistance to enzyme attack.
In these examples granular defatted thinned starch with variable fat contents were used in a two-step grafting procedure. The data is summarized in Table 7 below. The data shows that a fat content in the range of from 0.5% to 0.12% seems to have no marked effect on the final product.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________ Liquid Uptake ml/g Starch:An % Saponi- of Product % % Molar Sodium % fication Grams % 0.4% SodiumEx. fat N2 Ratio Grams Factor Hydrox. Water Type Product N2 H2 O Chloride__________________________________________________________________________26 0.05 19.1 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.6 5.1 444 10427 0.09 19.2 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.1 5.2 480 11028 0.12 18.9 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 19.4 5.2 362 97__________________________________________________________________________
For these examples grafting was accomplished by a two-step grafting procedure employing a starch which had been cooked in accordance with Example 2 prior to grafting. The starches were defatted, thinned and a thinned pearl starch. As can be seen from Table 8 below which summarizes the data for these examples, the use of a cooked starch for grafting rather than a granular starch produces a saponified polymer which has a marked increase in liquid uptake. Moreover, there was no thinning of urine tested product paste in a 24 hour period showing good resistance to enzyme attack. Similarly, polymers made with cooked starch and grafted with low mole ratios of starch to acrylonitrile, i.e., about 1:3 thinned, when tested with urine.
TABLE 8__________________________________________________________________________ Liquid Uptake ml/gVis- Starch:AN % Saponi- of Product cosity % Molar Sodium % fication Grams % 0.4%Ex. Buel fat Ratio Grams Factor Hydrox. Water type Product N2 H2 O Nacl Urine__________________________________________________________________________29 72 0.09 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3B 19.6 -- 1000 140 13030 79.5 0.5 1:9 24 15 4.0 55 3B 39.2 -- 900 126 11431 65 0.05 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3B 17.4 5.4 936 117 11732 65 0.05 1:9 12 15 4.0 60 3B 17.1 5.4 1000 117 11833 72 0.09 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3B 17.1 5.2 900 124 12134 72 0.09 1:9 12 15 4.0 60 3B 16.7 5.0 968 133 12135 74 0.12 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3A 17.5 5.3 920 117 11536 74 0.12 1:9 12 15 4.0 65 3A 18.0 5.4 940 118 110__________________________________________________________________________
The conductance for 0.4% sodium chloride solution was 7200 micromhos, for urine the conductance is 5360 micromhos. This shows that 0.4% sodium chloride solution will behave similar to urine.
In these examples a series of three different thinned cooked pearl starches were grafted with acrylonitrile by a two-step procedure, as in example 2 and the product was thereafter saponified. Cooked, thinned pearl starch, as seen in Table 9, produces a final product with improved liquid uptake over granular starch products. Generally defatted starch products give somewhat improved liquid uptake over thinned pearl products. Variation in water volume during saponification seemed to have a significant effect on water uptake, but only a slight improvement in uptake of a 0.4% sodium chloride solution as well as body fluid uptake. Data from Table 8 and Table 9 below shows that the best products were made using defatted or pearl, thinned, cooked starch grafted by a two-step procedure to a starch acrylonitrile mole ratio of 1:9 and saponified in a solution containing 4.0% sodium hydroxide, 55% water, and 45% methanol.
TABLE 9__________________________________________________________________________Vis- Starch:AN % Saponi- % nitrogen Liquid Uptake ml/g of product cosity Molar Sodium % fication Grams (Kjehldahl) 0.4% SodiumEx. Buel Ratio Grams Factor Hydrox. Water Type Product Procedure Water Chloride Urine__________________________________________________________________________37 79.5 1:9 12 15 4.0 45 3B 17.3 5.1 628 105 11138 79.5 1:9 12 15 4.0 50 3B 17.1 5.1 690 107 11739 79.5 1:9 12 15 4.0 55 3B 16.9 5.4 900 115 11640 79.5 1:9 12 15 4.0 60 3B 16.7 5.1 920 116 11441 79.5 1:9 (47.8) 15 4.0 55 3C 76.0 5.1 840 119 11942 79.5 1:12 (59) 15 4.0 55 3C 84.8 5.6 1000 120 11043 73 1:9 (47.8) 15 4.0 55 3C 68.0 -- 840 105 --44 80 1:9 (47.8) 15 4.0 55 3C -- -- 840 110 110__________________________________________________________________________
No reduction of viscosity of the urine tested product occurred in a 24 hour period.
As can be seen from the above identified examples, the employment of step-wise grafting procedure, in combination with one or more of the use of a thinned starch, a cooked starch, or a defatted starch, provides a product having significant advantages. The product where step-wise grafting and thinned, cooked pearl or defatted starches are used has resistance to enzyme activity, will not become less viscous when subjected to urine for a 24 hour period, has the ability to absorb more than 100 times its weight in body fluid, the ability to absorb between 800 and 1000 times its weight of water, when in a paste form will adhere to a substrate material, is clear, and in general represents a significantly improved starch polyacrylonitrile polymer composition. While only ceric free radical initiators have been employed in these examples, it is well understood by those skilled in the art that other free radical initiators might also be employed.
As can be seen, the invention accomplishes all of the stated objects, and represents a significant improvement in the art.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3997484 *||Sep 8, 1975||Dec 14, 1976||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Highly-absorbent starch-containing polymeric compositions|
|1||*||Chem. Absts. 66 (1967): 4050w; Fanta, "Graft Copolymers of Starch."|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4123397 *||Jun 15, 1977||Oct 31, 1978||General Mills Chemicals, Inc.||Agglomeration of starch-hydrolyzed polyacrylonitrile graft copolymer|
|US4144886 *||Oct 26, 1976||Mar 20, 1979||Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft||Absorbent laminate|
|US4159260 *||Nov 23, 1977||Jun 26, 1979||Henkel Corporation||Dispersible starch graft copolymer blend|
|US4221684 *||Dec 18, 1978||Sep 9, 1980||Illinois Cereal Mills||Absorbent polymeric compositions derived from corn flour and starch|
|US4226232 *||Apr 9, 1979||Oct 7, 1980||Spenco Medical Corporation||Wound dressing|
|US4263363 *||Dec 20, 1979||Apr 21, 1981||Colgate-Palmolive Company||Emulsion-containing absorbent article having improved water holding capacity|
|US4323487 *||Oct 22, 1979||Apr 6, 1982||Henkel Corporation||Absorbent starch graft polymer and method of its preparation|
|US4483950 *||Dec 10, 1982||Nov 20, 1984||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture||Modified starches as extenders for absorbent polymers|
|US4990338 *||May 9, 1988||Feb 5, 1991||Dow Corning Corporation||Antimicrobial superabsorbent compositions and methods|
|US5035892 *||Dec 5, 1990||Jul 30, 1991||Dow Corning Corporation||Antimicrobial superabsorbent compositions and methods|
|US5064653 *||Mar 29, 1988||Nov 12, 1991||Ferris Mfg. Co.||Hydrophilic foam compositions|
|US5065752 *||May 28, 1991||Nov 19, 1991||Ferris Mfg. Co.||Hydrophilic foam compositions|
|US5147343 *||Apr 10, 1989||Sep 15, 1992||Kimberly-Clark Corporation||Absorbent products containing hydrogels with ability to swell against pressure|
|US5149335 *||Feb 23, 1990||Sep 22, 1992||Kimberly-Clark Corporation||Absorbent structure|
|US5185009 *||Oct 28, 1991||Feb 9, 1993||Elmo Sitnam||Biodegradable diaper|
|US5532350 *||Feb 15, 1994||Jul 2, 1996||Rhone-Poulenc Inc.||Crosslinked polysaccharides useful as absorbent materials|
|US5601542 *||Mar 25, 1996||Feb 11, 1997||Kimberly-Clark Corporation||Absorbent composite|
|US5801116 *||Jun 20, 1997||Sep 1, 1998||Rhodia Inc.||Process for producing polysaccharides and their use as absorbent materials|
|US5886124 *||May 5, 1998||Mar 23, 1999||Grain Processing Corporation||Liquid-absorbent polymer and gelatinoid product|
|US5916928 *||Jun 5, 1995||Jun 29, 1999||Ferris Corporation||Polymer-based porous foam|
|US6040379 *||Aug 13, 1998||Mar 21, 2000||Penford Corporation||Starch copolymer products and process|
|US6646179||Dec 20, 1996||Nov 11, 2003||Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.||Absorbent composite|
|US6709526||Mar 7, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Melt processable starch compositions|
|US6723160||Feb 1, 2002||Apr 20, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Non-thermoplastic starch fibers and starch composition for making same|
|US6802895||Dec 19, 2003||Oct 12, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Non-thermoplastic starch fibers and starch composition for making same|
|US6811740||Feb 1, 2002||Nov 2, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Process for making non-thermoplastic starch fibers|
|US6955850||Apr 29, 2004||Oct 18, 2005||The Procter & Gamble Company||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US6977116||Apr 29, 2004||Dec 20, 2005||The Procter & Gamble Company||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US7025821||Oct 7, 2004||Apr 11, 2006||The Procter & Gamble Company||Non-thermoplastic starch fibers and starch composition for making same|
|US7029620||Mar 13, 2003||Apr 18, 2006||The Procter & Gamble Company||Electro-spinning process for making starch filaments for flexible structure|
|US7041369||Nov 27, 2000||May 9, 2006||The Procter & Gamble Company||Melt processable starch composition|
|US7276201||Mar 18, 2004||Oct 2, 2007||The Procter & Gamble Company||Process for making non-thermoplastic starch fibers|
|US7524379||Dec 17, 2003||Apr 28, 2009||The Procter + Gamble Company||Melt processable starch compositions|
|US7666261||Feb 23, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Melt processable starch compositions|
|US7704328||Nov 6, 2008||Apr 27, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Starch fiber|
|US7744791||Jun 27, 2005||Jun 29, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Method for making polymeric structures|
|US7754119||Jul 13, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Method for making polymeric structures|
|US7938908||May 10, 2011||The Procter & Gamble Company||Fiber comprising unmodified and/or modified starch and a crosslinking agent|
|US8168003||Mar 31, 2011||May 1, 2012||The Procter & Gamble Company||Fiber comprising starch and a surfactant|
|US8623246||May 21, 2010||Jan 7, 2014||The Procter & Gamble Company||Process of making a fibrous structure|
|US8764904||Mar 23, 2012||Jul 1, 2014||The Procter & Gamble Company||Fiber comprising starch and a high polymer|
|US9017586||May 21, 2010||Apr 28, 2015||The Procter & Gamble Company||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20030203196 *||Mar 13, 2003||Oct 30, 2003||Trokhan Paul Dennis||Flexible structure comprising starch filaments|
|US20040132873 *||Dec 17, 2003||Jul 8, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Melt processable starch compositions|
|US20040149165 *||Dec 19, 2003||Aug 5, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Non-thermoplastic starch fibers and starch composition for making same|
|US20040183238 *||Mar 18, 2004||Sep 23, 2004||James Michael David||Process for making non-thermoplastic starch fibers|
|US20050076809 *||Oct 7, 2004||Apr 14, 2005||Mackey Larry Neil||Non-thermoplastic starch fibers and starch composition for making same|
|US20050244635 *||Apr 29, 2004||Nov 3, 2005||The Procter & Gamble Company||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20050263938 *||Jun 27, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Cabell David W||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20050275133 *||Jun 27, 2005||Dec 15, 2005||Cabell David W||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20090061225 *||Nov 6, 2008||Mar 5, 2009||The Procter & Gamble Company||Starch fiber|
|US20090124729 *||Nov 6, 2008||May 14, 2009||The Procter & Gamble Company||Melt processable starch compositions|
|US20100225018 *||May 21, 2010||Sep 9, 2010||David William Cabell||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20100230846 *||May 21, 2010||Sep 16, 2010||David William Cabell||Polymeric structures and method for making same|
|US20100247615 *||Sep 30, 2010||Quick-Med Technologies, Inc.||Superabsorbent Materials Comprising Peroxide|
|US20110177335 *||Jul 21, 2011||The Procter & Gamble Company||Fiber comprising starch and a surfactant|
|DE3046277A1 *||Dec 9, 1980||Sep 10, 1981||Colgate Palmolive Co||Saugfaehiger artikel|
|WO1985003081A1 *||Jan 16, 1984||Jul 18, 1985||George Frederick Fanta||Modified starches as extenders for absorbent polymers|
|U.S. Classification||525/54.32, 523/111, 47/DIG.10, 527/312, 526/238.22, 604/368|
|International Classification||C08F251/00, A61L15/60, A61F13/00, A61F13/20, A61F13/15|
|Cooperative Classification||C08F251/00, Y10S47/10, A61L15/60, A61F2013/530481|
|European Classification||C08F251/00, A61L15/60|