|Publication number||US4374210 A|
|Application number||US 06/303,217|
|Publication date||Feb 15, 1983|
|Filing date||Sep 18, 1981|
|Priority date||Sep 18, 1981|
|Also published as||CA1185743A, CA1185743A1, DE3273357D1, EP0075130A2, EP0075130A3, EP0075130B1|
|Publication number||06303217, 303217, US 4374210 A, US 4374210A, US-A-4374210, US4374210 A, US4374210A|
|Inventors||James H. Ewen, Thomas R. McClellan, Michael H. McMillin, Pat L. Murray|
|Original Assignee||The Upjohn Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (88), Classifications (11), Legal Events (9)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the preparation of polyurethane-polyurea compositions and is more particularly concerned with improvements in a process of preparing polyurethane-polyureas by reaction of organic polyisocyanates, polyols and aromatic diamine extenders and with the compositions so prepared.
2. Description of the Prior Art
U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,543 provides a comprehensive review of the prior art relating to the preparation of polyurethane-polyureas by the reaction of organic polyisocyanates, polymeric polyols and various polyamine extenders and said review is incorporated herein by reference. The same patent also describes a significant advance in the art by teaching how to make this type of composition using reaction injection molding (RIM) techniques. The key factors in the method there described are the choice of a particular group of aromatic diamines as the extender and the use of a "one-shot" procedure, i.e. a procedure in which the organic polyisocyanate, polymeric polyol and amine extenders are brought together simultaneously and allowed to react, as opposed to a "prepolymer" procedure in which two or more of the reactants are prereacted before being brought into contact with the remainder of the reactants.
The particular aromatic diamines targeted by the above reference are those aromatic diamines having alkyl groups in both positions ortho to one amino group and in at least one of the positions ortho to the second amino group. A particularly preferred group of aromatic diamines is represented by 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,6-diaminobenzene and mixtures thereof. These compounds are those derived by diethylation of 2,4- and or 2,6-toluenediamine or mixtures thereof and are generally referred to by the initials "DETA."
The reference also requires that the organic polyisocyanate be 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) or liquid modifications thereof derived by reacting the diisocyanate with a minor amount of a low molecular weight diol or by converting a portion of the diisocyanate to carbodiimide in accordance with known procedures; see the above cited U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,543 at Column 7, lines 17-28.
The method of the reference provides a means of producing polyurethane-polyureas by a RIM type process using reaction mixtures which have gel times of as low an order as about 3 seconds but which, in spite of the shortness of the latter time, can still be employed to fill complicated mold cavities having a relatively large volume. Further, the physical properties, including structural strength properties, of the resulting moldings are generally excellent.
We have found, however, that the use of the one-shot procedure described in the reference has an inherent disadvantage which arises from the need to maintain the diisocyanate separate from the polymeric polyol and the diamine extender and to feed the diisocyanate as a separate stream to the mixing head, the second stream comprising a mixture of the polymeric polyol and diamine. Since the equivalent weight of the diisocyanate is much lower than that of the polymeric polyol the proportion by weight in which the diisocyanate stream and the combined polyol and diamine stream are brought together in the mixing head is substantially less than equal, the diisocyanate stream proportion being only approximately one-half of that of the other stream. As will be obvious to one skilled in the art, it is generally desirable that the two streams being fed to the high pressure mixing heads used in RIM processing be mixed in substantially equal amounts by volume in order to achieve the maximum output per unit of time from the RIM head. In view of the above noted restriction on the relative amounts in which the two streams are to be mixed in the one-shot process discussed above, it is apparent that there is a significant limitation built into the maximum output of mixed reactants which can be derived by the process in question. This limitation on output, when taken together with the very short gel times of the reaction mixture produced, places very severe limits on the total weight of reactants which can be introduced into any given mold using the process of the reference. This translates into a clear limit on the size of any article which can be produced in a single shot using the process.
We have now found that these various limitations can be overcome by utilizing the diisocyanate in the form of certain prepolymers formed from certain polymeric polyols. As will be apparent from the detailed disclosure below, this enables one to achieve a RIM process in which the two streams being fed to the mixing head are mixed in a wide range of proportions including close to equal proportions, thereby enabling one to operate at much higher outputs per unit time than is the case with the reference procedure. Further, it is found that the use of the prepolymer perceptibly increases the gel time of the reaction mixes and permits a greater degree of latitude to the operator than is available using the extremely short reaction times which characterize the one-shot procedure.
Our findings are all the more unexpected in view of the previous experience in the use of aromatic diamines as extenders for isocyanate-terminated prepolymers. U.S. Pat. No. 3,428,610 discloses the preparation of cross-linked polyurethanes by reaction of isocyanate-terminated prepolymers with the very same class of aromatic diamines which the aforesaid U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,543 indicates is the preferred class for use in the one-shot procedure discussed above. However, the U.S. Pat. No. 3,428,610 patent reports processing times varying over a range between 3 and 45 minutes, all of which would be unacceptable in a RIM procedure operated commercially. In contrast, utilizing the particular prepolymers and procedures described below, we have found that gel times as low as 2.5 seconds can be achieved.
This invention comprises an improved process for the production of polyurea-polyurethane moldings by the reaction of an organic polyisocyanate with a polyol and an aromatic diamine wherein at least one of the positions ortho to each of the amino groups is substituted by lower-alkyl, in the presence of a catalyst for the reaction between hydroxy groups and isocyanato groups, wherein the improvement comprises employing as the organic polyisocyanate an isocyanate-terminated prepolymer derived by reaction of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) with a polyol having a functionality from 2 to 3 selected from the class consisting of copolymers of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide having molecular weights from about 1000 to about 10,000, polytetramethylene glycols having molecular weights from about 600 to about 5000 and polyester polyols having molecular weights from about 500 to 8,000, said polyol and said polyisocyanate being reacted in the proportion of about 0.01 equivalents to about 0.5 equivalents of said polyol per equivalent of said isocyanate.
The invention also comprises polyurea-polyurethane moldings prepared in accordance with the above process.
The term "lower-alkyl" as used in this specification and the claims appended hereto means alkyl having from 1 to 6 carbon atoms, inclusive, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl, hexyl and isomeric forms thereof.
The improved process of the invention can be carried out using conventional techniques in the art and employing any standard equipment, including mixing apparatus and molding equipment, which will tolerate the relatively low reaction times involved in the process. These reaction times can vary from as low as 2.5 seconds for gel time up to 7.0 seconds or even higher, depending on factors which will be discussed below. The process of the invention is especially adapted for use in reaction injection molding techniques but can also be applied to other situations, such as spray applications and casting applications, in which the components are dispensed using high pressure mixing equipment. While the discussion below will be directed mainly to the preferred applications in reaction injection molding techniques, it is to be understood that the same considerations will apply to other situations such as those mentioned above.
The key to the advantages which are to be derived from the use of the process of the invention lies in the employment of a particular series of prepolymers as the isocyanate component of the reaction mixture. The isocyanate-terminated prepolymers in question are reacted with a mixture of a polymeric polyol and a diamine in the presence of a catalyst for the reaction between isocyanate groups and active hydrogen-containing groups. In the present state of the art of high pressure mixing heads, such as those currently used for reaction injection molding techniques, it is conventional to employ two streams which are introduced and caused to mix by impingement under high pressure. One of these streams is that comprising the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer in the present invention and this stream is generally designated Stream A. The other stream is a blend of the polyol and the diamine plus the catalyst together with any of the other conventional additives normally employed in making compositions of the type in question. The two streams are brought together in such proportions that the ratio of equivalents of isocyanate in Stream A and to the total equivalents of active hydrogen containing groups in Stream B is within the range of about 0.8:1 to about 1.3:1.
As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, the above range of proportions by equivalents can encompass a wide range of proportions by weight depending on the equivalent weights of the various components involved. In practice it is found that the range of proportions by weight of Stream A to Stream B can vary over a wide range from about 0.4:1 to about 2.5:1. However, the most desirable range of proportions when using reaction injection molding equipment is substantially equal proportions by weight since this enables one to produce maximum output of total reactants in a given time. If one of the two streams is employed in a proportion less than equal to the proportion of the other, the maximum output of components which can be achieved is considerably reduced. Further, as will be explained in more detail later, if the reactivity of the reaction mixture is of a very high order, the maximum amount of reactant which can be dispensed before filling of the mold has to be discontinued is also severely limited. In the present case it is possible to achieve a wide range of reaction times depending on the particular application being considered and this, taken together with the ability to use the reaction streams in relatively equal proportions by weight, considerably increases, and gives a greater degree of latitude to, the amount of material which can be dispensed into a given mold.
The prepolymers which are employed in the process of the invention are those which are derived from 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) by reaction with less than a stoichiometric amount of a polyether or polyester diol or triol of the type defined above. Advantageously, the proportion of the polyol to polyisocyanate employed in preparing the prepolymer is within the range of about 0.01 to about 0.5 equivalents of polyol per equivalent of polyisocyanate and, preferably, is within the range of about 0.015 to about 0.25 equivalents per equivalent of polyisocyanate. This results in the production of prepolymers having isocyanate contents in the range of about 9 to about 20 percent in the case of the broadest range of proportions and within the range of about 12 to about 16 percent in the case of the preferred range.
The production of the prepolymer is carried out in accordance with well-known techniques. Illustratively, the diisocyanate and the polyol are brought together by any convenient means and in appropriate apparatus and are heated together at a temperature within the range of about 60° C. to about 80° C., advantageously under an atmosphere of inert gas such as nitrogen, until the reaction is determined to be complete as determined by routine analyses for isocyanate content carried out on aliquots of the reaction mixture or by other suitable analytical techniques.
In an optional, but preferred, embodiment of the invention the formation of the prepolymer is carried out using any of the above-identified polyols in combination with a minor amount of a low molecular weight glycol such as dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, polypropylene glycols of molecular weight up to about 425, N,N-di(2-hydroxypropyl)aniline, and the like including mixtures of two or more such glycols. Preferably the low molecular weight glycol has a molecular weight which does not exceed about 425. By "minor amount" is meant an amount which is less than about 20 percent by weight based on total weight of polyol and low molecular weight glycol. Preferably the amount of low molecular weight glycol employed is less than about 16 percent by weight based on the total weight of polyol plus glycol. The upper limit on the amount of the glycol employed is dictated by the consideration that the use of the glycol results in a significant increase in viscosity of the isocyanate prepolymer. Amounts of glycol in excess of those discussed above generally serve to render the viscosity of the prepolymer too high to be useful in the reaction injection molding process of the invention.
The prepolymer obtained as described above can be used as such in the reaction injection molding process of the invention and in this case it advantageously has a viscosity which lies in the range of about 500 cps to about 2500 cps and preferably in the range of about 800 cps to about 2000 cps.
In an optional, but preferred, embodiment of the invention the prepolymer so obtained is blended with a minor amount of a liquefied form of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate). The latter types of diisocyanate are those well-recognized in the art which have been treated to make them stable liquids at temperatures of about 15° C. or higher. Such compositions include the carbodiimide-containing 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanates) having isocyanate equivalents of from about 130 to about 180 prepared, for example, by heating 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) with a carbodiimide catalyst to convert a portion of said isocyanate to carbodiimide in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 3,384,653. The compositions also include methylenebis(phenyl isocyanates) which have been reacted with minor amounts (from about 0.04 to 0.2 equivalents per equivalent of isocyanate) of low molecular weight glycols as described for example in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,394,164; 3,644,457; 3,883,571; and 4,031,026.
The amount of such liquid forms of methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) employed in making the blends is generally less than about 20 percent by weight and preferably is less than about 12 percent by weight. The actual amount used in any particular instance depends largely on the viscosity required in the resulting blend. Advantageously, the blending is carried out in order to achieve a final viscosity in the blend in the range of about 800 cps to about 2000 cps.
Illustrative of the polymeric polyols which can be employed in preparing the above prepolymers are polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diols and triols having molecular weights in the stated range and obtained by the chemical addition of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, together or sequentially, to di- or trifunctional initiators such as water, propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, glycerol, trimethylolpropane and the like; polytetramethylene glycols having molecular weights in the stated range; vinyl reinforced polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diols and triols obtained by polymerizing styrene, acrylonitrile, and like polymerizable monomers in the presence of the polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene polyether; polyesters having molecular weights within the stated range and derived by reaction of the appropriate di- or tri-basic carboxylic acid (or anhydride) such as succinic, adipic, suberic, azelaic, phthalic, isophthalic, trimellitic and tetrahydrophthalic acids with the appropriate dihydric alcohol such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, butanediol-1,4, hexanediol-1,2, neopentyl glycol, and the like; and polycaprolactones having molecular weights within the stated range.
The preferred polyols for use in the preparation of the prepolymers are polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diols having molecular weights in the range of about 1800 to about 10,000 and most preferably in the range of about 2500 to about 5000.
In carrying out the process of the invention as it applies to reaction injection molding the above prepolymers or blends of said prepolymers with minor amounts of liquid forms of methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate), are employed as Stream A. Stream B comprises a mixture of an aromatic diamine and a polymeric polyol. The aromatic diamines are those which have at least one alkyl group in an ortho position to each of the two amino groups and in the preferred class of diamines all of the positions ortho to each amino group are substituted by lower-alkyl.
Illustrative, but not limiting, of the aromatic diamines used in accordance with the present invention are 1,3-dimethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1,3-diethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1,3-dimethyl-2,6-diaminobenzene, 1,4-diethyl-2,5-diaminobenzene, 1,4-diisopropyl-2,5-diaminobenzene, 1,4-dibutyl-2,5-diaminobenzene, 1,3,5-triethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1,3,5-triisopropyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,6-diaminobenzene (and mixtures of the latter two diamines in varying proportions), and the like; 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-diaminonaphthalene, 2,6-dimethyl-1,5-diaminonaphthalene, 2,6-diisopropyl-1,5-diaminonaphthalene, 2,6-dibutyl-1,5-diaminonaphthalene, and the like; 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-benzidine, 3,3',5,5'-tetraisopropyl-benzidine, and the like; 3,3',5,5'-tetramethyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,3',5,5'-tetraethyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,3',5,5'-tetraisopropyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,3',5,5'-tetrabutyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,5-diethyl-3'-methyl-2', 4-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,5-diisopropyl-3'-methyl-2', 4-diaminodiphenylmethane, 3,3'-diethyl-2,2'-diaminodiphenylmethane, and the like; 3,3',5,5'-tetraethyl-4,4'-diaminobenzophenone, 3,3',5,5'-tetraisopropyl-4,4'-diaminobenzophenone; 3,3',5,5'-tetraethyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenyl ether, 3,3',5,5'-tetraisopropyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenyl ether; 3,3',5,5'-tetraisopropyl-4,4'-diaminodiphenyl sulfone, and the like.
Preferably, the aromatic diamines employed in the process of the invention are selected from 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,4-diaminobenzene, 1-methyl-3,5-diethyl-2,6-diaminobenzene, and the products obtained by condensing a substituted aniline of the formula (I) set forth below or a mixture of two or more such substituted anilines, with formaldehyde under acid conditions to obtain substituted diaminodiphenylmethanes having the formula (II): ##STR1## wherein R1 and R3 are selected from hydrogen and lower-alkyl and R2 and R4 are lower-alkyl. If one uses only a single substituted aniline (I) to prepare (II) the groups R1 and R3 will be identical and so will R2 and R4. If one uses two differently substituted anilines in the above reaction the product will be a mixture of a number of different methylenedi(anilines) all conforming to the formula (II).
The polyols which are employed in combination with the aromatic diamines in Stream B have molecular weights within the range of about 1800 to about 10,000 and can be any of the polyols previously employed in the art having functionalities from about 2 to about 4. The choice of polyol to be used in any given formulation will depend on the specific polymer properties required in the end-product. Generally speaking, the preferred functionality is from about 2 to about 3 and the preferred molecular weight range is from about 3000 to about 10,000, most preferably from about 4000 to about 8000.
Illustrative, but not limiting, of the classes of polyols which can be used are the polyoxyalkylene polyethers; polyester polyols; polyol adducts derived from reaction of propylene oxide with a mixture of methylenedianiline and polymethylene polyphenylamines (in accordance, for example, with U.S. Pat. No. 3,423,344); polyols obtained by the Mannich condensation of a phenolic compound with formaldehyde and an alkanolamine, followed by reaction with propylene oxide (in accordance, for example, with U.S. Pat. No. 3,297,597); vinyl reinforced polyether polyols, e.g. those obtained by the polymerization of styrene or acrylonitrile in the presence of the polyether; polyacetals prepared from glycols such as diethylene glycol and formaldehyde; polycarbonates, for example those derived from reaction of butanediol with diarylcarbonates; polyester amides; the resole polyols (see Prep. Methods of Polymer Chem. by W. R. Sorenson et al., 1961, page 293, Interscience Publishers, New York, N.Y.); and the polybutadiene resins having primary hydroxyl groups (see Poly Bd. Liquid Resins, Product Bulletin BD-3, October 1974, Arco Chemical Company, Div. of Atlantic Richfield, New York, N.Y.).
A preferred group of polyols comprises the propyleneoxy-polyethyleneoxy capped diols and triols obtained by the reaction of ethylene and propylene oxides, together or sequentially using as initiator water, ammonia, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, trimethylolpropane, aniline, ethanolamine, and the like; the polyester diols obtained from the reaction of dibasic carboxylic acids such as succinic, adipic, suberic, azelaic, phthalic, isophthalic, and the like with alkylene glycols, and oxyalkylene glycols to form the corresponding polyalkylene, and polyoxyalkylene ester diols or copolymers thereof; and the vinyl-resin reinforced propyleneoxy-ethyleneoxy capped diols and triols, particularly those polyethers reinforced with polyacrylonitrile.
A particularly preferred group of polyols to be employed in Stream B are the vinyl-resin reinforced propyleneoxy-ethyleneoxy capped diols and triols.
The proportions within which the aromatic diamine and the polyol can be employed in Stream B can vary over a wide range provided that the ratio in which Stream A and Stream B are mixed in such that the overall ratio of active hydrogen groups in Stream B lies within the range of about 0.8 to about 1.3 equivalents per equivalent of polyisocyanate in Stream A. Preferably the proportion of diamine to polyol in Stream B is such that, in the ultimate reaction mixture, the ratio of equivalents of aromatic diamine per equivalent of polyisocyanate is within the range of about 0.5:1 to about 0.95:1 and preferably within the range of about 0.7:1 to about 0.9:1.
In addition to the prepolymer, the polyol and the aromatic diamine employed in the process of the invention, there is also employed a catalyst for the reaction between hydroxyl groups and isocyanate groups. Generally speaking, this catalyst is introduced by incorporating it in the B stream when operating using the RIM process.
Any of the catalysts conventionally employed in the art to catalyze the reaction of an isocyanate with a reactive hydrogen containing compound can be employed for this purpose; see, for example, Saunders et al., Polyurethanes, Chemistry and Technology, Part I, Interscience, New York, 1963; pages 228-232; see also, Britain et al., J. Applied Polymer Science, 4, 207-211, 1960. Such catalysts include organic and inorganic acid salts of, and organometallic derivatives of, bismuth, lead, tin, iron, antimony, uranium, cadmium, cobalt, thorium, aluminum, mercury, zinc, nickel, cerium, molybdenum, vanadium, copper, manganese and zirconium, as well as phosphines and tertiary organic amines. Representative organotin catalysts are stannous octoate, stannous oleate, dibutyltin diacetate, dibutyltin dioctoate, dibutyltin dilaurate, dibutyltin maleate, dibutyltin mercaptopropionate, dibutyltin didodecylmercaptide, dibutyltin bis(isoctylthioglycolate), and the like. Representative tertiary organic amine catalysts are triethylamine, triethylenediamine, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine, N,N,N',N'-tetraethylethylenediamine, N-methylmorpholine, N-ethylmorpholine, N,N,N',N'-tetramethylguanidine, N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-1,3-butanediamine, N,N-dimethylethanolamine, N,N-diethylethanolamine, N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine, and the like, and mixtures of the above in any combination.
The preferred catalysts are the organo metallic compounds and particularly the dialkyl tin salts such as the dibutyltin compounds noted above.
The amount of catalyst employed in any given situation will depend upon the nature of the other components of the mixture and the desired reaction times. Generally speaking, the catalyst is employed within a range of about 0.01 percent by weight to about 5 percent by weight and preferably from about 0.02 to about 3 percent by weight based on total weight of the reaction mixture.
By appropriate selection of the combination of reactants in a particular system as well as the proportions of the reactants, it is possible to obtain reaction times, in particular, gel times which can vary over a range from as low as about 2.5 seconds to as high as about 7.5 seconds. Preferably, the combination of reactants and the proportions in which they are employed is chosen, generally by a process of trial and error, so that the gel time of the resulting reaction mixture is in the range of about 2.75 seconds to about 6.0 seconds, and most preferably in the range of about 3.0 seconds to about 4.5 seconds. The range of gel times which is possible using the process of the present invention represents a marked advantage over the much shorter gel times which are characteristic of the one-shot procedures set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,543.
In addition, the process of the invention permits one to use a much wider range of proportions by weight of Stream A to Stream B in a RIM type reaction or in any other type of processing procedure involving high-pressure mixing which can accommodate the above range of gel times. Thus, the proportion of the prepolymer to the combination of diamine and polyol employed in the reaction mixture can be varied by appropriate adjustment of one or more of various factors. These factors include adjustment of the isocyanate content of the prepolymer; the higher the isocyanate content of the prepolymer, the greater will be the proportion of active hydrogen containing materials in the combination of polyol and diamine which will be necessary to achieve the desired ratio of isocyanate to active hydrogen groups within the ranges set forth previously. Other factors obviously are the molecular weight of the polyol, the molecular weight of the diamine, and the proportions in which the diamine and polyol are present within the reaction mixture.
In a particularly desirable mode of operation of a RIM process the proportions by weight of Stream A and Stream B are substantially equal. This permits the machine to be operated, if desired, at its maximum rate of output for both streams.
To illustrate the advantages of being able to operate at maximum output of a machine with streams having higher, i.e. longer gel times, the following example may be considered. Using a machine which is capable of feeding and mixing two streams at a rate for each stream of 10 lbs. per minute, it will be apparent that, if both streams are mixed in equal proportions, it is possible to operate at a total output rate of 20 lbs/minute of mixed reactants.
However, if one must operate one stream at a rate which is only 50 percent of the maximum, then the total output of the machine will be only 15 lbs/minute. If, further, the reaction mixture produced has a gel time of, for example, 5 seconds, it will only be possible to mix and pour for a total of 4 seconds. This would enable one to pour a total of 1.33 pounds where both streams are operated at maximum rate but only 1 pound where one component is utilized at half the rate of the other component. If the gel time is now increased from 5 seconds to 10 seconds, the "safe" period for a pour would now be 8 seconds. This would permit the total weight of material dispensed to be increased to 2.66 pounds in the case of mixing of equal proportions and 2 pounds in the case of the lower proportion of one side versus the other. Both of these amounts represent substantial increase over the amount (1 pound) which can be dispensed using the unequal ratio of components and the lower reaction time.
It will, therefore, be seen that the advantages of the longer reaction times which are permitted in accordance with the process of the invention and the higher output, permitted by the greater flexibility in proportions of components, are cumulative in terms of operation of the process.
In addition to the reaction components discussed above which are employed in the process of the invention there can be present, generally in the Stream B when operating in accordance with a RIM procedure, other optional additives such as dispersing agents, surfactants, flame retardants, pigments, reinforcing agents, fibers, and the like in accordance with procedures well-known in the art.
The process of the invention is generally used to prepare non-cellular polyurethane-polyurea moldings. However, it is also possible to utilize the process of the invention to prepare microcellular or cellular moldings by the incorporation of blowing agents into the reaction mixture. The blowing agent may be incorporated into either of the streams employed in a RIM type process in appropriate amounts depending on the required density of the resulting molding. Any of the blowing agents known in the art can be employed including water and volatile inert organic liquids, preferably those having boiling points in the range of about 22° C. to about 35° C. Illustrative of such liquids are butane, hexane, heptane, methylene chloride, chloroform, monofluorotrichloromethane, chlorodifluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane and the like. The blowing agents employed may also include compounds which decompose at temperatures above room temperature to liberate gas such as nitrogen. Examples of such compounds are azo compounds and, more particularly, azoisobutyric acid nitrile.
The polyurethane-polyureas produced in accordance with the process of the invention are characterized by excellent structural strength properties such as impact strengths, tensile, hardness, heat resistance, modulus, and tear strength. The polyurethane-polyureas produced in accordance with the invention find a wide range of utility particularly in the molding of auto parts such as car bumpers, body elements, panels, doors, engine hoods, skirts, air scoops and the like. As pointed out previously, the reaction times and the proportions in which the reactants can be brought together in accordance with the present invention are clearly manifest when the process of the invention is employed to prepare moldings such as those set forth above.
The following examples describe the manner and process of making and using the invention and set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventors of carrying out the invention but are not to be construed as limiting.
A charge of 52.8 parts by weight (0.42 equiv.) of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (4,4'-MDI) was heated under an atmosphere of nitrogen at 110°-120° F. with stirring while a total of 5.87 parts by weight (0.082 equivs.) of a mixture of equal parts by weight of dipropylene glycol (DPG) and tripropylene glycol (TPG) was added followed by 31.33 parts by weight (0.018 equivs.) of a polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diol (Polyol SF-4005: Texaco Chemical; molecular weight=3500). After the addition was complete, the temperature of the mixture was raised to 175° to 185° F. and maintained thereat with stirring under an atmosphere of nitrogen for 2 hours. At the end of this time an aliquot was removed from the reaction mixture and found to have an isocyanate equivalent of 281.8. The reaction mixture was then cooled to approximately 140° F. and 10 parts of a liquid form of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) in which a portion of the isocyanate had been converted to carbodiimide [isocyanate equivalent 143: prepared as described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,384,653] was added with stirring. Agitation was continued for 30 minutes after addition was complete and the mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature (circa 20° C.). The prepolymer blend so obtained was found to have an isocyanate equivalent of 252 and viscosity at 25° C. of 1825 centistokes. This prepolymer is referred to hereafter as Prepolymer A. Similarly using the above procedure but omitting the mixture of di- and tripropylene glycol in certain instances, there were prepared a series of prepolymers using the reactants and proportions (all parts by weight) set forth in Table I below. In all cases the prepolymers were blended, in the final step described above, with 10 parts by weight of the liquid form of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) described above, before cooling to room temperature. The isocyanate equivalent and the viscosity of the resulting blends are also recorded in Table 1.
TABLE 1______________________________________Pre- DPG/ Viscosity atpoly- TPG 25° C.mer 4,4'-MDI (1:1) Polyol:Parts I.E. (centistokes)______________________________________B 52.8 5.87 SF4005:31.33 250 1700C 43.58 4.85 SF4005:41.57 300 2604D 45.8 5.1 E21051 :39.1 300 6594E 43.1 4.8 55-282 :42.1 300 2541F 43.9 4.9 PPG30253 :41.2 300 2904G 36.72 -- SF39504 :53.28 300 1352H 36.09 -- SF65035 :53.91 300 1393I 39.24 -- 1037-556 :50.76 300 6487J 39.24 -- E2105:50.76 300 619K 39.24 -- 55-567 :50.76 300 954L 54.5 6.1 ECFL45048 :29.4 250 1768M 54.5 6.1 4480-229 :29.4 250 2972N 52.6 5.8 14-2810 :31.6 250 4748O 44.1 -- D-44011 :45.9 250 705P 48.05 2.53 24-3212 :39.42 250 1155Q 53.0 -- SF4005:31.00 197.3 180______________________________________ Footnotes to Table 1 1 Polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diol; MW = 2000; Texaco Chemical. 2 Polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diol; MW = 4000; Olin. 3 Polyoxypropylene glycol; MW = 3000; Union Carbide. 4 Polyoxypropylene polyoxyethylene polyol; MW = 3500; Texaco. 5 Polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene triol; MW = 6500; Texaco Chemical 6 Ethylene butylene adipate polyester diol; MW = 2000; Hooker. 7 Polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene diol; M.W. = 2000; Olin. 8 Polyoxypropylene glycol capped with ethylene oxide (E.O.); MW = 2040; Witco. 9 Polyoxypropylene glycol capped with E.O.; MW = 4000; Witco. 10 Polyoxypropylene glycol capped with E.O.; E.W. = 2000; Union Carbide. 11 Polyoxypropylenetriol capped with E.O. grafted with 20 percent polyacrylonitrile; MW = 6000; Union Carbide. 12 Polyoxypropylene polyoxyethylene diol grafted with polystyrene/polyacrylonitrile; MW = 3500; Union Carbide.
A series of samples of polyurethane-ureas was prepared from Prepolymer A (see Example 1) using a Cannon HF-10 RIM machine capable of delivering 125 lbs. per minute of each of the two reactant streams. The mold size used in all cases was 20"×38"×0.125". The Prepolymer A was the single component representing Stream A. Stream B was obtained by blending the following ingredients in the proportions stated below (all parts by weight).
Polyol D-440 (see Footnote 11, Ex. 1): 50.16 parts
DETDA1 : 11.03 parts
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate2 : 0.05 parts
A total of 9 samples was prepared utilizing different ratios of Stream A:Stream B as shown by the index in Table 2 below. Stream A was preheated to 100° F. and Stream B was preheated to 130° F. prior to mixing in all cases and the mold was preheated to 140° F. Demolding was carried out 1.0 minutes after completion of the shot in all cases and each sample was cured at 250° F. for 1 hour prior to being subjected to physical testing. Table 2 records in the case of each sample the proportions in which Streams A and B were mixed as shown by the index, i.e., the ratio of equivalents of isocyanate in Stream A per equivalent of active hydrogen containing groups in Stream B, and the physical properties determined for the molded sample.
In the case of Sample 5 the gel time was determined as 3.5 seconds, the gel time being the time interval between the instant of mixing of the component Streams and the time at which the mixed reactants subsequently changed from a fluid state to a solid (gel) state. The gel time represents the maximum period for which mixed reactants could be dispensed by the RIM machine into the mold without risk of producing a defective molding due to failure of reactants to maintain fluid flow in the mold. (Note: it has been reported, see for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,218,543 at column 5, lines 8-22 that the shot time, i.e. the time for which material can be injected into a mold, can exceed the gel time but applicants have found that this is not so in actual practice). At the weight ratio of Streams A and B employed to make Sample 5 the maximum output of mixed reactants was 202 lbs./minute. Since the gel time was 3.5 seconds the maximum weight of mixed reactants which could be dispensed into a mold in this period was 11.79 lbs. This latter represents the maximum weight of a molded part which could be prepared safely using the above ratio of Streams A and B.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9Index 0.90 0.93 0.96 1.00 1.03 1.07 1.10 1.14 1.17__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesDensity g/cc 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.09 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.06Hardness Shore D 57 60 62 61 60 63 62 63 62Tensile Modulus: psiat 100% 2100 2300 2400 2300 2700 2700 2700 2800 2800 200% 2700 3000 3200 3000 3600 3600 3650 3800 3800 300% 3300 3900 4300 4200 -- -- -- -- --Ultimate Tensile: psi 3900 4200 4400 4200 4500 4800 4500 4800 4700Elongation at break % 370 330 320 300 280 280 220 280 260Tensile Set % 100 90 80 80 75 90 80 80 801 Heat Sag at 250° F.: in. 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.12 Flexural Modulus: psi-20° F. 89,041 84,715 90,737 104,424 101,562 108,907 105,382 107,692 112,901 75° F. 41,400 35,433 33,528 40,816 42,905 41,400 46,669 47,184 46,165 158° F. 20,701 22,036 24,040 26,380 23,372 18,745 29,154 21,369 26,490__________________________________________________________________________ Footnotes: 1 Test CT222006AA of General Motors, Chevrolet Division, Flint, Michigan. Value shown is the amount of sag in a sample (1" × 6" × 0.125") exposed to the stated temperature for 60 minutes. 2 Determined using ASTM Test D790.
The following series of experiments was carried out for purposes of comparison and shows the effect of utilizing the process of the prior art by replacing the Stream A utilized in Example 2 by a modified form of 4,4'-MDI which was not a prepolymer and adding to Stream B the polyol which was employed in making the prepolymer of Example 2. A series of 7 samples was prepared utilizing the same procedure as that employed in Example 2 but utilizing an Admiral 2000-2HP RIM machine and varying the proportions of Streams A and B over substantially the same range as was done in Example 2. The isocyanate employed in Stream A in the present example was obtained by reacting 346 parts by weight of 4,4'-MDI with 39 parts by weight of a mixture of dipropylene glycol and tripropylene glycol using the reaction conditions and procedure described in Example 1. The product of this reaction was then blended with 66 parts by weight of the same liquid form of 4,4' -methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) employed in Example 1 and utilizing the blending procedure there described. The final product was found to have an isocyanate equivalent of 166.
Stream B employed in this example had the following composition (substantially identical to Stream B of Example 1 with the addition of Polyol SF-4005, the polyol used to prepare the prepolymer of Stream A in Example 2):
SF-4005: 15.05 parts by weight
D-440: 48.05 parts by weight
DETDA: 10.57 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.0737 parts by weight
The ratio of the above Streams A and B utilized in making the samples as shown by the index and the physical properties of the cured samples are shown in Table 3. The gel time of the reaction mixture was 2.4 seconds. The maximum output of the mixed reactants at an index of 1.03 was 168.5 lbs/minute and the maximum part weight which could be dispensed using the above gel time and output was 6.74 lbs. which compares very unfavorably with the corresponding figures shown in Example 2.
The tensile modulus, heat sag and flexural modulus values for the samples shown in Example 2 are significantly better than the values for the samples of Example 3 made at the corresponding A/B ratios.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Index 0.93 0.96 0.99 1.02 1.05 1.08 1.11__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesDensity g./cc. 1.07 1.09 1.06 1.09 1.06 1.07 1.08Hardness Shore D 46 50 50 54 57 57 58Tensile Modulus: psiat 100% 1100 1300 1400 1850 1850 2100 2100 200% 1300 1600 1800 2450 2550 2900 2900 300% 1450 1900 2150 3150 3300 3800 3900Ultimate tensile: psi 1500 2450 2750 4050 3800 4400 4680Elongation at break: % 370 550 470 370 340 350 350Die "C" Tear: pli 490 600 560 690 620 730 740Heat Sag at 250° F.: in. 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2Flexural Modulus: psi-20° F. 54,875 59,085 61,798 67,179 74,635 74,460 86,956 75° F. 12,600 16,333 17,000 25,000 23,834 27,100 26,740 158° F. 10,000 8,943 8,849 16,400 16,385 19,036 18,089__________________________________________________________________________
A series of 8 samples was prepared using the same Stream A and procedure as described in Example 2 but modifying the composition of the Stream B to reduce the amount of diamine therein and increase correspondingly the amount of polyol. The composition of the Stream B so modified was as follows:
D-440: 58.17 parts by weight
DETDA: 8.72 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.058 parts by weight.
The admixing of Streams A and B and injection into the mold (20"×38"×0.125") was carried out using an Admiral 2000-2HP RIM machine operating under the same reactant and mold temperature ranges shown in Example 2. The samples were prepared using a wide range of proportions of Streams A and B the details of which and the physical properties of the cured samples are given in Table 4.
The gel time measured in respect of the composition fabricated at an index of 1.05 was 4.3 seconds, the maximum output at that ratio being 186.7 lbs/minute and the maximum part weight capable of being dispensed with the above gel time being 13.38 lbs.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24Index 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesDensity, gr./cc. 1.02 1.05 1.07 1.08 1.09 1.09 1.10 --Hardness, Shore D 49 52 54 53 52 52 53 53Tensile Modulus, psiat 100% 1800 2000 2000 2000 2100 1700 1600 1600 200% 2500 2800 2800 2900 3000 2300 2200 2200 300% 3200 3700 3700 3900 4000 -- -- --Ultimate Tensile, psi 3500 3800 4000 4200 4200 2900 2500 2500Elongation, % 350 350 350 300 320 288 280 280Tensile set, % 80 70 70 70 20 55 35 50Heat Sag @ 250° F./60minutes 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2Flexural Modulus, psi-20° F. 52,000 49,270 53,381 54,783 60,289 57,256 69,210 64,680 75° F. 16,625 18,288 20,550 17,685 21,858 20,781 17,456 19,026 158° F. 10,260 12,141 11,980 11,053 18,883 16,188 10,665 10,799__________________________________________________________________________
A series of 8 samples was prepared using the same Stream A and procedure as described in Example 2 but modifying the composition of Stream B to increase the amount of diamine therein and decrease correspondingly the amount of polyol. The composition of the Stream B so modified was as follows:
D-440: 39.90 parts by weight
DETDA: 13.96 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.04 parts by weight
The admixing of Streams A and B and injection into the mold (20"×38"×0.125") was carried out using a Cannon HF-10 RIM machine operating under the same reactant and mold temperature ranges shown in Example 2. The samples were prepared using a wide range of proportions of Streams A and B the details of which and the physical properties of the cured samples are given in Table 5.
The gel time measured in respect of the composition fabricated at an index of 1.03 was 2.7 seconds, the maximum output at that ratio being 220 lbs/minute and the maximum part weight capable of being dispensed with the above gel time being 9.9 lbs.
TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32Index 0.90 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.0 1.03 1.09 1.12__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesHardness, Shore D 64 65 65 68 68 66 67 70Tensile Modulus, psiat 100% 2800 3100 3200 3600 3700 3200 3650 3700 200% 3400 3750 3900 4400 4500 4000 4550 4800 300% 3800 4500 4900 5600 -- -- -- --Ultimate Tensile, psi 4300 4750 5100 5700 5600 4550 5450 5700Elongation, % 380 320 300 300 290 220 250 230Tensile Set, % 140 120 120 125 120 100 105 105Die "C" Tear, pli 980 1000 1020 1100 1060 990 1120 1140Heat Sag @ 250° F./60minutes 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.10 0.0Flexural Modulus, psi-20° F. 131,524 130,485 120,532 133,000 153,846 128,684 137,000 155,385 75° F. 58,650 62,215 62,000 67,595 56,000 66,198 69,230 76,923 158° F. 30,769 37,375 34,000 39,461 42,442 35,785 42,906 39,142__________________________________________________________________________
A series of 10 samples was prepared using exactly the procedure described in Example 2 but replacing the Stream B there used by a Stream B having the following composition:
SF 6503: 39.90 parts by weight
DEDTA: 13.96 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.04 parts by weight.
The machine employed was an Admiral 2000-2HP but otherwise the procedure and reaction conditions were exactly as in Example 2. Table 6 records the proportions of Streams A and B used to make the samples together with the physical properties determined on the cured samples.
The gel time measured in respect of the composition fabricated at an index of 1.02 was 2.9 seconds, the maximum output at that ratio being 230 lbs/minute and the maximum part weight capable of being dispensed with the above gel time being 11.09 lbs.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42Index 0.90 0.92 0.96 0.98 1.0 1.02 1.04 1.07 1.10 1.14__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesHardness, Shore D 51 54 54 55 56 57 57 61 63 61Tensile Modulus, psiat 100% 1300 1500 1750 2000 2000 2200 2300 1750 2600 3200 200% 1500 1650 2100 2400 2500 2800 3000 3800 3600 -- 300% 1600 1850 2450 7000 3100 3600 -- -- -- --Ultimate Tensile, psi 1800 2400 3400 4000 4900 4200 3850 3800 3800 4208Elongation, % 500 550 500 430 380 360 280 220 200 180Tensile Set, % 120 160 130 110 100 90 75 65 60 60Die "C" Tear, pli 600 690 730 775 760 740 740 840 810 870Heat Sag @ 250° F./60minutes 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2Flexural Modulus, psi-20° F. 85,385 84,615 54,405 82,000 88,272 89,248 98,524 96,154 98,456 110,932 75° F. 28,246 29,816 32,097 34,000 33,348 35,103 35,698 42,147 43,737 45,164 158° F. 13,788 14,460 14,892 17,378 13,600 17,377 17,495 23,077 22,308 25,782__________________________________________________________________________
A series of 7 moldings was prepared using exactly the procedure, reaction conditions and equipment described in Example 2 but replacing Stream B there used by a Stream B having the following composition:
D-440: 100 parts by weight
1 MDIFP: 66 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.2 parts by weight
Table 7 records the proportions of Streams A and B used to make the samples together with the physical properties determined on the cured samples.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Sample No. 43 44 45 46 47 48 49Index .94 .98 1.01 1.05 1.07 1.10 1.13__________________________________________________________________________PropertiesDensity, gr./cc. 1.10 1.10 1.09 1.12 1.09 1.12 1.10Hardness, Shore D 67 68 66 70 70 71 72Tensile Modulus, psi - 100% 3250 3400 3550 3550 3400 3500 4000Ultimate Tensile, psi 3300 4500 3600 3850 4400 4200 4200Elongation, % 110 230 110 110 200 150 120Die "C" Tear, pli 750 800 820 835 790 775 785Flexural Modulus, psi-20° F. 144,676 169,082 156,054 150,462 160,296 127,389 132,850 75° F. 75,228 93,612 79,410 87,277 79,006 75,000 85,875 158° F. 43,721 43,112 42,987 47,450 42,978 44,035 47,195__________________________________________________________________________
A molding was prepared using the procedure and reaction conditions described in Example 2 but replacing the Stream B there used by a Stream B having the following composition:
1 Voranol 5148: 100 parts by weight
DETDA: 35 parts by weight
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.2 parts by weight
The equipment employed was an Admiral 2000 HP RIM machine and the mold dimensions were 123/4"×141/2"×0.14". The Streams A and B were mixed in a weight ratio of 0.9016:1.00 corresponding to an index of 1.10. The properties of the cured moldings (all properties are an average of six determinations) were as follows:
Density: g/cc.: 1.07
Hardness, Shore D: 59
Tensile modulus, psi
Ultimate tensile, psi: 4600
Elongation %: 290
Die "C" Tear, pli: 691
Flexural modulus, psi
-20° F.: 72,891
75° F.: 46,000
158° F.: 29,228
The machine output under the above conditions was 238 lbs/minute, the gel time was 3.2 seconds and the maximum part weight was 12.7 lbs.
Using exactly the procedure and equipment described in Example 2 a series of six moldings was prepared using prepolymer Q (prepared as described in Example 1) as Stream A and using a Stream B obtained by blending the following ingredients in the proportions stated (all parts by weight):
Polyol D-440: 48.91 parts
DETDA: 10.76 parts
Blend of equal parts of di- and tripropylene glycol: 2.86 parts
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.0625 parts
The above combination of Streams A and B corresponds to that employed in Example 2 except that the mixture of di- and tripropylene glycol is present in Stream B rather than being used in making the prepolymer of Stream A.
Table 8 records the proportions of Streams A and B used to make the moldings together with the physical properties determined for the cured moldings. The gel time for the reaction mixture employed at an index of 1.01 was 2.6 seconds. The maximum possible output of the RIM machine at this ratio was 197.5 lbs/minute. The maximum part weight capable of being dispensed at this index was therefore 8.56 lbs.
TABLE 8______________________________________Sample No. 50 51 52 53 54 55Index 0.93 0.96 0.99 1.01 1.04 1.08______________________________________PropertiesDensityg./cc. 1.08 1.10 1.09 1.08 1.07 1.08HardnessShore D 55 55 58 56 61 61TensileModulus,psiat 100% 2200 2100 2150 2150 2300 2500 200% 3000 3000 3000 3000 3250 3500 300% 4100 3900 -- 4000 -- --UltimateTensile, psi 4350 3900 3700 4100 3500 4000Elon-gation % 310 300 280 310 220 200Die "C"Tear, pli 660 590 550 680 680 690Heat sag @250° F.: in 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1FlexuralModulus,psi-20° F. 72,319 70,814 77,546 82,740 102,608 103,896 75° F. 24,409 26,757 26,539 20,551 25,498 30,546 158° F. 17,391 20,320 20,975 15,905 20,226 19,833______________________________________
This is a comparison example which shows the result of carrying out the production of polyurea-polyurethane elastomers using the "one-shot" process described in the prior art as contrasted with the prepolymer process of the present invention.
A series of samples was prepared using an Admiral 2000-2 HP RIM machine with a mold of dimensions 24"×24"×0.125". The operating conditions and temperatures were those described in Example 2. Stream A was a polyisocyanate blend obtained by mixing 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) with the liquid form of 4,4'-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) employed in Example 1 in the ratio of 20.44 parts by weight of the former and 4.19 parts by weight of the latter. Stream B was a blend of the following ingredients in the proportions shown (all parts by weight):
Polyol D-440: 47.49 parts
Polyol SF 4005: 14.86 parts
DETDA: 10.45 parts
Diethylene glycol: 1.39 parts
Tripropylene glycol: 1.39 parts
Dimethyl tin dialcoholate: 0.075 parts.
Table 9 records the proportions of Streams A and B used to make the moldings together with the physical properties determined for the cured moldings. The gel time at an index of 1.03 was 1.5 seconds. The maximum output of the RIM machine at this index was 165 lbs/minute but the maximum part weight capable of being dispensed at this index was only 4.1 lbs. which contrasts markedly with the much higher part weights which can be dispensed in accordance with the invention.
TABLE 9______________________________________Sample No. 56 57 58 59 60 61Index 0.96 0.99 1.03 1.06 1.09 1.12______________________________________PropertiesDensity,g./cc. 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.11 1.09Hardness,Shore D 56 54 55 55 57 58TensileModulus, psiat 100% 2200 1950 2100 2200 2200 2400 200% 2950 2600 2800 3000 3050 3250 300% 3900 3400 3800 -- -- --UltimateTensile, psi 4100 3800 3800 3650 3700 3750Elonga-tion, % 310 350 300 270 250 240TensileSet, % 80 85 75 65 70 60Die "C"Tear, pli 650 560 620 630 650 640Heat Sag @250° F./60 min.: in. 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2FlexuralModulus, psi-20° F. 73,242 72,000 71,000 77,374 79,000 81,925R.T. 25,737 28,000 27,000 25,300 26,000 31,000 158° F. 21,030 13,961 18,500 19,666 20,600 22,300______________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3428610 *||May 10, 1966||Feb 18, 1969||Bayer Ag||Polyurethanes prepared from aromatic amines having alkyl groups in the ortho positions to the amine groups|
|US4218543 *||Jan 15, 1979||Aug 19, 1980||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Rim process for the production of elastic moldings|
|US4298701 *||Apr 14, 1980||Nov 3, 1981||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the production of elastic shaped articles|
|1||*||Frisch et al., (Ed.), Advances in Urethane Sci. & Technology, Technomic, Westport, Conn., vol. 4, 1976, pp. 134 and 135.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4396729 *||Apr 23, 1982||Aug 2, 1983||Texaco Inc.||Reaction injection molded elastomer containing an internal mold release made by a two-stream system|
|US4420570 *||Sep 13, 1982||Dec 13, 1983||Texaco Inc.||Reaction injection molded elastomer containing an internal mold release made by a two-stream system|
|US4433067 *||Apr 23, 1982||Feb 21, 1984||Texaco Inc.||Reaction injection molded elastomers prepared from amine terminated polyethers, amine terminated chain extender and aromatic polyisocyanate|
|US4444910 *||Apr 23, 1982||Apr 24, 1984||Texaco Inc.||Reaction injection molded elastomers made using a polyurethane organometallic catalyst amine terminated polyethers amine terminated chain extender and aromatic polyisocyanate|
|US4546114 *||Oct 25, 1984||Oct 8, 1985||The Upjohn Company||Process for the preparation of polyurea elastomers|
|US4552945 *||Dec 19, 1984||Nov 12, 1985||The Dow Chemical Company||Polyamide-polyurea polymers by the RIM process|
|US4559366 *||Mar 29, 1984||Dec 17, 1985||Jaquelyn P. Pirri||Preparation of microcellular polyurethane elastomers|
|US4658007 *||May 7, 1985||Apr 14, 1987||The Dow Chemical Company||Polyisocyanurate-based polyoxazolidone polymers and process for their preparation|
|US4659747 *||May 15, 1986||Apr 21, 1987||The Dow Chemical Company||Cyclohexanedimethanol/diamine mixtures as RIM extenders|
|US4667009 *||Sep 25, 1985||May 19, 1987||The Dow Chemical Company||Polymethylene polyphenylamine modified diamine chain extenders in polyurea elastomers|
|US4698371 *||Sep 26, 1985||Oct 6, 1987||Basf Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the preparation of optionally cellular polyurethane-polyurea molded parts using urethane group- and isocyanurate group-containing 2,4- and/or 2,6-toluene diisocyanates|
|US4719278 *||Mar 17, 1987||Jan 12, 1988||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the preparation of thixotropic binders, the binder obtainable by this process and their use for the preparation of coating and sealing compounds|
|US4777187 *||Jan 29, 1988||Oct 11, 1988||Bayer Aktiengesellshaft||Process for the production of molded articles, mixtures of isocyanate reactive compounds suitable therefor and the molded articles obtained by the process|
|US4780523 *||Mar 2, 1987||Oct 25, 1988||The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company||Meta-tetramethyl xylene diamine polyurethane compositions and process of making the same|
|US4816543 *||Aug 23, 1985||Mar 28, 1989||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Polyurethane system using monotertiary-alkyltoluenediamine as a cross linker|
|US4829734 *||Oct 31, 1986||May 16, 1989||Eltech Systems Corporation||Ceramic fiber insulation module and method of assembly|
|US4914064 *||Oct 14, 1987||Apr 3, 1990||Exxon Research And Engineering Company||Highly aromatic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non-aromatics|
|US4929667 *||Feb 1, 1989||May 29, 1990||Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Urethane prepolymer composition and a polyurethane coating composition system|
|US4937283 *||Aug 4, 1988||Jun 26, 1990||The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company||Meta-tetramethyl xylene diamine polyurethane compositions and process of making the same|
|US4950789 *||Jan 25, 1989||Aug 21, 1990||The Dow Chemical Company||Aromatic polyalkyleneoxy polyamines containing amioncarbonyl or aminothiocarbonyl moieties and a compatible mixture of high and low molecular weight polyols made therefrom|
|US4983643 *||Jun 8, 1989||Jan 8, 1991||Mobay Corporation||Polyurea elastomers with reduced brittleness|
|US5001166 *||Jan 25, 1989||Mar 19, 1991||Robson Mafoti||Novel polyetherester based prepolymers and elastomers made therefrom|
|US5011902 *||Nov 1, 1989||Apr 30, 1991||Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc.||Co-catalyst system for preparing polyurethane based plywood-patch compositions|
|US5015718 *||Jun 30, 1989||May 14, 1991||Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.||Adhesives and method for making the same|
|US5055632 *||Dec 29, 1989||Oct 8, 1991||Exxon Research & Engineering Company||Highly aromatic polyurea/urethane membranes and their use for the separation of aromatics from non-aromatics|
|US5104910 *||Jan 3, 1991||Apr 14, 1992||The Dow Chemical Company||Combustion-modified polyurethane foam|
|US5128433 *||Jun 4, 1991||Jul 7, 1992||Polytek Development Corp.||Thixotropic polymer compositions and process for use thereof|
|US5141967 *||May 17, 1991||Aug 25, 1992||Miles Inc.||Process for the preparation of polyurea-polyurethane elastomers|
|US5246977 *||Jul 28, 1992||Sep 21, 1993||The Dow Chemical Company||Microcellular polyurethane polymers prepared from isocyanate-terminated poly(oxytetramethylene) glycol prepolymers|
|US5262448 *||Apr 27, 1990||Nov 16, 1993||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the preparation of polyurea elastomers containing urethane groups|
|US5364852 *||Apr 29, 1993||Nov 15, 1994||Basf Aktiengesellschaft||Preparation of compact or cellular elastomers containing urethane and urea groups, and moldings produced therefrom|
|US5491175 *||Mar 25, 1993||Feb 13, 1996||The Dow Chemical Company||Polyurethane foam molding|
|US5510053 *||Dec 29, 1994||Apr 23, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5530034 *||Oct 26, 1995||Jun 25, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5532285 *||Oct 23, 1995||Jul 2, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5532403 *||Oct 25, 1995||Jul 2, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5539009 *||Oct 26, 1995||Jul 23, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5539010 *||Oct 30, 1995||Jul 23, 1996||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5585452 *||Jun 6, 1995||Dec 17, 1996||Bayer Corporation||Polyisocyanate based upon 4,4'-and 2,4'-diphenyl-methane dllsocyanates and use thereof in a rim process|
|US5672635 *||Oct 23, 1995||Sep 30, 1997||Basf Corporation||Water-blown polyurethane sealing devices and compositions for producing same|
|US5811506 *||Feb 3, 1997||Sep 22, 1998||Simula Inc.||Extrudable thermoplastic elastomeric urea-extended polyurethane|
|US5840782 *||Sep 8, 1995||Nov 24, 1998||Imperial Chemical Industries Plc||Reaction system for preparing microcellular elastomers|
|US6127505 *||Sep 2, 1998||Oct 3, 2000||Simula Inc.||Impact resistant polyurethane and method of manufacture thereof|
|US6258917||Sep 21, 1998||Jul 10, 2001||Simula, Inc.||Extrudable thermoplastic elastomeric urea-extended polyurethane|
|US6455165||May 19, 2000||Sep 24, 2002||The Dow Chemical Company||Laminate of olefinic unsaturated containing polymers and active hydrogen containing polymers|
|US6548616||Dec 13, 2000||Apr 15, 2003||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Lightweight tire support and composition and method for making a tire support|
|US6800715||Feb 7, 2003||Oct 5, 2004||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Lightweight tire support and composition and method for making a tire support|
|US6887063||Sep 6, 2001||May 3, 2005||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Processing mold including unitary movable mandrel for preparing tire support|
|US7129279||Sep 16, 2004||Oct 31, 2006||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Lightweight tire support and composition and method for making a tire support|
|US7393491||Feb 23, 2005||Jul 1, 2008||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Method for preparing a tire support|
|US7939161||Dec 18, 2007||May 10, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Encapsulated panel assemblies and methods for making same|
|US7955696||Jun 7, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Composites and methods for conductive transparent substrates|
|US7955702||Jun 7, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||One component glass primer including oxazoladine|
|US7956151||Nov 13, 2009||Jun 7, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Universal primer compositions and methods|
|US8080609||Dec 20, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Low energy surface bonding system containing a primer with long open time|
|US8101043||Jan 24, 2012||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Colored primer compositions and methods|
|US8147974||Dec 18, 2008||Apr 3, 2012||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Protective coating for window glass having enhanced adhesion to glass bonding adhesives|
|US8168019||May 25, 2011||May 1, 2012||Dow Global Technologies Llc||One component glass primer including oxazoladine|
|US8442670 *||Nov 26, 2008||May 14, 2013||Michelin Recherche Et Technique S.A.||Automated surface preparations for the inner surface of a tire|
|US8980433 *||Oct 30, 2007||Mar 17, 2015||Michelin Recherche Et Technique S.A.||Polyurethaneurea system|
|US9193880||Dec 18, 2007||Nov 24, 2015||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Adhesion promotion additives and methods for improving coating compositions|
|US20020144766 *||Sep 6, 2001||Oct 10, 2002||Moore Earl T.||Method and device for preparing a tire support|
|US20030158366 *||Feb 7, 2003||Aug 21, 2003||Schrock Alan K.||Lightweight tire support and composition and method for making a tire support|
|US20050033009 *||Sep 16, 2004||Feb 10, 2005||Schrock Alan K.||Lightweight tire support and composition and method for making a tire support|
|US20060061013 *||Feb 23, 2005||Mar 23, 2006||Moore Earl T||Method and device for preparing a tire support|
|US20080145564 *||Dec 18, 2007||Jun 19, 2008||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Adhesion promotion additives and methods for improving coating compositions|
|US20080152926 *||Dec 18, 2007||Jun 26, 2008||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Composites and methods for conductive transparent substrates|
|US20080268261 *||Feb 19, 2008||Oct 30, 2008||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||One component glass primer including oxazoladine|
|US20090017312 *||Feb 22, 2008||Jan 15, 2009||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Colored primer compositions and methods|
|US20090162592 *||Dec 18, 2008||Jun 25, 2009||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Protective coating for window glass having enhanced adhesion to glass bonding adhesives|
|US20090309266 *||Dec 17, 2009||Peter Thomas H||Reaction injection molding system and processes for producing polyurethane articles|
|US20100063196 *||Mar 11, 2010||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Universal primer compositions and methods|
|US20100068530 *||Oct 30, 2007||Mar 18, 2010||Philippe Laubry||Polyurethaneurea System|
|US20100105829 *||Oct 29, 2009||Apr 29, 2010||Dow Global Technologies Inc.||Low energy surface bonding system containing a primer with long open time|
|US20100243127 *||Nov 26, 2008||Sep 30, 2010||Michelin Recherche Et Technique, S.A.||Automated surface preparations for the inner surface of a tire|
|US20110220269 *||Sep 15, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||One component glass primer including oxazoladine|
|CN101528798B||Oct 30, 2007||Sep 26, 2012||米其林技术公司||Polyurethaneurea system|
|DE3827595A1 *||Aug 13, 1988||Feb 22, 1990||Bayer Ag||Verfahren zur herstellung von urethangruppen ausweisenden polyharnstoff-elastomeren|
|EP0219709A2 *||Sep 24, 1986||Apr 29, 1987||The Dow Chemical Company||Polymethylene polyphenylamine modified diamine chain extenders and polyurea elastomers therefrom|
|EP2762508A1||Jul 22, 2008||Aug 6, 2014||Dow Global Technologies LLC||Two part polyurethane curable composition having substantially consistent G-modulus across the range of use temperatures|
|EP2848638A1||Sep 11, 2013||Mar 18, 2015||Purbond AG||Adhesive system for lignocellulosic substrates having high levels of extractives|
|WO1984003288A1 *||Feb 13, 1984||Aug 30, 1984||Dow Chemical Co||An active hydrogen-containing composition which provides mold release properties to a molded article, an internal mold release composition for preparing the active hydrogen-containing composition, and a process for preparing molded polymeric products from the active hydrogen-containing composition|
|WO1986006734A1 *||May 7, 1986||Nov 20, 1986||The Dow Chemical Company||A process for preparing a polyoxazolidone|
|WO2008118352A1 *||Mar 21, 2008||Oct 2, 2008||Innovatier, Inc.||A step card and method for making a step card|
|WO2008149180A2 *||Oct 30, 2007||Dec 11, 2008||Societe De Technologie Michelin||Polyurethaneurea system|
|WO2008149180A3 *||Oct 30, 2007||Mar 19, 2009||Philippe Laubry||Polyurethaneurea system|
|WO2011075254A1||Nov 15, 2010||Jun 23, 2011||Dow Global Technologies Llc||Isocyanatosilane-capped polyols|
|WO2014086797A1||Dec 3, 2013||Jun 12, 2014||Purbond Ag||Adhesive system for preparing lignocellulosic composites|
|U.S. Classification||521/159, 521/51, 528/64|
|International Classification||C08G18/65, C08G18/00, C08G18/42, C08G18/48, C08G18/10|
|Cooperative Classification||C08G2120/00, C08G18/10|
|Nov 1, 1982||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UPJOHN COMPANY,THE, KALAMAZOO, MICH. A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:EWEN, JAMES H.;MC CLELLAN, THOMAS R.;MC MILLIN, MICHAELH.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:004058/0610
Effective date: 19810910
|Jan 16, 1986||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE, 2030 DOW CENTER, ABBOTT
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:UPJOHN COMPANY, THE,;REEL/FRAME:004508/0626
Effective date: 19851113
|Apr 11, 1986||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 23, 1990||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|May 10, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP COMPANY, BERMUDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE;REEL/FRAME:006531/0906
Effective date: 19930430
|May 12, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHEMTECH ROYALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P., SWITZERLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006539/0073
Effective date: 19930430
|Jul 1, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP COMPANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CHEMTECH ROYALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.;REEL/FRAME:006595/0712
Effective date: 19930616
|Jul 2, 1993||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, THE, MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006605/0225
Effective date: 19930616
|Apr 18, 1994||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12