|Publication number||US4379847 A|
|Application number||US 06/225,098|
|Publication date||Apr 12, 1983|
|Filing date||Jan 14, 1981|
|Priority date||Sep 19, 1979|
|Also published as||US4259207|
|Publication number||06225098, 225098, US 4379847 A, US 4379847A, US-A-4379847, US4379847 A, US4379847A|
|Inventors||Mitchell J. Fruitstone, Michele M. Tilly, Betty G. Pixton|
|Original Assignee||American Hospital Supply Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (12), Non-Patent Citations (20), Referenced by (16), Classifications (21), Legal Events (15)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application Ser. No. 76,716 filed Sept. 19, 1979, now U.S. Pat. No. 4,259,207.
The present invention relates to a suspending medium for use in immunologic reactions. More particularly, the invention relates to a suspending medium for immunohematologic reactions and to a method for potentiating agglutination reactions.
Immunohematologic agglutination reactions have conventionally been conducted in media comprised of physiological saline (ca. 0.15M NaCl) or albumin solutions. Thus, in antibody screening, antibody identification, crossmatches, direct or indirect antiglobulin testing, blood grouping, and the like, cells are conventionally washed and suspended in physiological saline for reaction with test serums. The use of physiological saline in such reactions suffers from certain disadvantages. Notably, lengthy incubation times are often required to observe agglutination reactions. In certain situations, such as crossmatching for emergency transfusions, it is important to obtain reaction results as quickly as possible. Another disadvantage of physiological saline is that cells tend to be sticky and, thus, adhere to glass surfaces, making evaluation of reaction results difficult.
Physiological saline has been modified to overcome some of these disadvantages. Esposito, V. M. and Weinstein, S. B., U.S. Pat. No. 3,970,427, describe a suspending solution containing physiological saline and a small amount of gelatin. The addition of gelatin was found to reduce or eliminate the problem of sticking between erythrocytes and glass surfaces, and to reduce hemolysis. Another procedure in widespread use involves the addition of an albumin solution, e.g. 22% or 30% bovine albumin, to a suspension of cells in physiological saline. The albumin is thought to enhance the agglutination reaction by reducing the electrostatic charge on the cell surfaces. Technical Manual of the American Association of Blood Banks, Wm. V. Miller, Ed., American Association of Blood Banks, Washington, D.C., 1977, p. 167.
For many years, low ionic strength solutions, i.e. solutions having ionic strengths lower than that of physiological saline, have been known to enhance agglutination in many immunologic tests. However, the procedures employing such solutions produced an unacceptable incidence of false (non-antibody) positive reactions and stymied their general acceptance. Low, B. and Messeter, L., Vox. Sang. 26, 53-61 (1974) reported a low ionic strength solution which included sodium glycinate. That solution produced few false positive reactions, and when compared to standard procedures employing physiological saline or bovine albumin, a reduction in required incubation times with specific antibody-containing serums was realized. The solution also increased the antibody uptake and the strengths of agglutination reactions with certain antibodies. Subsequent work indicates that procedures employing low ionic strength suspending media are at least as sensitive, and in most cases are more sensitive, than routine procedures employing physiological saline or albumin for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies.
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved low ionic strength solution for use in immunologic reactions. A further object of the invention is to provide a low ionic strength suspending medium which enhances immunohematologic agglutination reactions.
In accordance with the invention, disclosed is an aqueous suspending medium for immunologic reactions, comprising gelatin, having a Bloom rating from about 75 to about 300, at a concentration such that the Bloom rating times concentration in weight percent is from about 40 to about 150; albumin, at a concentration of from about 4.0 wt. % to about 6.0 wt. %; sufficient organic solute to provide an osmolality of from about 150 mOsm/kg. H2 O to about 450 mOsm/kg. H2 O; sufficient salt of an alkali or alkaline earth metal to provide an ionic strength equivalent to about a 0.01 molar to about a 0.10 molar solution of sodium chloride; and a pH from about 6.0 to about 8.0.
The suspending medium of the present invention has a low ionic strength, as compared to physiological saline. Salts of alkali or alkaline earth metals may be added to the solution to provide the desired ionic strength. Any such salts may be used, such as halides, azide, sulfate, nitrate, acetate, carbonate, bicarbonate, bisulfate, phosphates, and the like. Preferred salts are halide or azide salts of an alkali or alkaline earth metal, and particularly preferred are sodium or potassium chloride and sodium azide. When sodium azide is used, either alone or in conjunction with other salts, it serves the dual role of affecting ionic strength and acting as a preservative against microbial contamination. The preservative function of sodium azide can be particularly beneficial when the use of mercury-containing preservatives, such as thimerosal, is undesirable. Ions from other sources, such as buffers, pH adjusting agents, and albumin, also contribute to the ionic strength of the final product. Therefore, to determine the quantity of salt to be added, the electrical conductivity (or resistivity) of the solution may be used as a measure of ionic strength. The absolute value of the electrical conductivity is not critical, but the measurement is useful for comparison to solutions of known ionic strengths. The ionic strength of the suspending medium of the present invention is equivalent to about 0.01 molar to about 0.1 molar aqueous sodium chloride solutions. Preferably, the ionic strength will be equivalent to about a 0.02 molar to about 0.05 molar sodium chloride solution. It is not necessary to measure the electrical conductivity of each batch of solution, once the desired formula is determined, but the measurement is useful for initially determining the relative proportions of ingredients for a specific formulation.
The solution includes gelatin in a concentration of from about 0.15% to about 1.5 wt. %, depending upon the gel strength (Bloom rating) of the gelatin employed. The higher the Bloom rating, the lower the gelatin concentration can be. Gelatins having Bloom ratings from about 75 to about 300 are generally employed, and Bloom ratings from about 100 to about 275 are preferred. For 100 Bloom gelatin, the concentration generally ranges from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. %, preferably from about 0.7 wt. % to about 1.3 wt. %. Gelatin having a Bloom rating of 260 is employed at a concentration of from about 0.2 wt. % to about 0.6 wt. %, preferably from about 0.25 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % and most preferably, about 0.3 wt. %. The relationship between Bloom rating and concentration can conveniently be expressed as the arithmetic product of the two factors. Thus, the Bloom rating times concentration (in wt. %) generally ranges from about 40 to about 150, preferably from about 40 to about 130, and most preferably, from about 45 to 90. Solutions in which the Bloom rating-concentration product is lower than about 40 have been found to result in a significant reduction in serologic activity, and Bloom rating-concentration products greater than about 150 may cause gelling of the product at room temperature.
The gelatin used in this invention is advantageously finely divided to facilitate dissolution, and is preferably of at least laboratory grade purity in accordance with the listing in the U.S. Pharmacopea or National Formulary. The source of the gelatin and the procedures used in its preparation are not critical. Thus, gelatin obtained from the partial hydrolysis of collagen derived from calfskin, pigskin, and the skin, white connective tissue, and bones of various animals all appear suitable. Similarly, the gelatin may be derived from an acid-treated precursor (Type A) or from an alkali-treated precursor (Type B).
Albumin is also advantageously dissolved in the solution at a concentration of from about 3.0 wt. % to about 7.0 wt. %, preferably from about 4.0 wt. % to about 6.0 wt. %. The source of the albumin used is not critical. Bovine serum albumin is preferable because of its availability and cost, but albumin obtained from the fractionation of plasma from virtually any animal, such as horse, sheep, swine, chicken and human, may be employed. The albumin is preferably substantially salt-free or low in salt, so as not to contribute appreciably to the ionic strength of the final solution. The effect of the salt concentration of the albumin on ionic strength should be considered when determining the concentration of other ingredients.
Because the ionic strength of the solution of the present invention is lower than that of physiological saline, the osmolality must be adjusted to approximate physiological values. If the osmolality of the solution is too low, the erythrocytes will lyse, and if it is too high, they will become crenated. The osmolality of the present solutions is controlled within a range of from about 150 mOsm/kg. H2 O to about 450 mOm/kg. H2 O. Preferably, the osmolality is adjusted from about 250 mOsm/kg. H2 O to about 400 mOsm/kg. H2 O. Any solute which does not substantially increase the ionic strength of the solution, and which does not deleteriously react with any other components of the solution or interface with the immunologic reaction may be employed to control osmolality. Such solute is preferably organic, such as an amino acid, a sugar, a soluble alcohol, etc. Particularly preferred solutes are glycine, sucrose, and glucose.
The optimum pH for immunologic reactions varies from one antibody or antibody group to another. For a universal suspending medium, the pH is advantageously adjusted to provide near optimum conditions for the greatest number of tests. Accordingly, the pH of the suspending media of this invention is adjusted from about 6.0 to about 8.0. A preferred pH range is from about 6.4 to about 7.4. The pH may be adjusted with an acid or a base as is well known in the art. Mineral acids such as hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, and the like and alkali or alkaline earth metal hydroxides such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, etc. are used. To provide greater control of pH, a suitable buffer may be used in a pH-controlling amount. Any buffer capable of controlling pH within the desired range and which does not interfere with the reaction, may be employed. Conventional phosphate buffers are preferred for this purpose.
The ingredients of the suspending medum may be combined in any convenient manner. A preferred manner of preparing the solution is to sequentially dissolve the ingredients in a portion of the total volume of water to be used. The water may be heated, e.g. to 50° C.-60° C. and stirred to facilitate dissolution of the gelatin. After the gelatin is dissolved, the remaining ingredients are dissolved in the solution. The pH is then adjusted and the remaining water is added.
The solution will usually be packaged and stored for extended periods of time; therefore, it is desirable to sterilize the solution and to incorporate a preservative therein. Sterilization may be accomplished by any convenient means such as sterile filtration, irradiation, and the like. Suitable preservatives include conventional bacteriostats or antibiotics such as preserving amounts of thimerosal, phenylmercuric acetate, sodium azide, neomycin or chloramphenicol, or combinations thereof.
The solutions of this invention may be employed in a wide variety of immunologic reactions. They are particularly useful in immunohematologic reactions, such as antibody screening, antibody identification, crossmatches, direct or indirect antiglobulin testing, blood grouping, and the like. The solutions may also be used in other types of immunologic reactions, such as latex particle agglutination tests, e.g., as in the latex agglutination assay for hepatitis surface antigen, and other antigen-antibody reactions.
The present invention constitutes a significant advance over previous suspending media for immunohematologic reactions. The addition of gelatin to a low ionic strength solution was found to improve the performance of that solution. Agglutination reactions were stronger and more easily interpreted, and incubation times were reduced.
Surprisingly, the incorporation of both albumin and gelatin into the formulation resulted in a suspending medium having properties much improved over conventional albumin or saline solutions, or glycine-containing low ionic strength solutions. Sensitivity was greater than that of the solution containing only gelatin, resuspension was facilitated, and there were fewer questionable or rough looking negative reactions. Moreover, the incidence of nonspecific agglutination reactions or false positives has been found to be quite low with these solutions.
In addition to its use in antibody detection, antibody identification, and compatibility testing, the suspending medium of the present invention may be utilized as the base for preparation of various blood grouping serums. These serums have the advantages of increased sensitivity and decreased reaction times that are found using low ionic strength solutions with patient antibodies. The increased sensitivity allows less antiserum (or lower titers) to be used for preparation of blood grouping serums of at least equal reactivity to conventional serums. The cost savings associated with such serums is apparent.
Thus, a new low ionic strength solution has been discovered which possesses antibody-enhancing characteristics superior to the solutions currently used in blood banking. Increased sensitivity is realized while the incubation times required for both IgG and IgM antibodies are reduced.
The invention is further illustrated by the following examples which are not intended to be limiting.
Approximately 400 kg. of purified water was charged into a stainless steel tank equipped with an agitator and a heating means. The water was heated to 50° C.-60° C. Gelatin (8.0 kg.) having a Bloom rating of 100, was added to the water and the mixture was stirred for 2-21/2 hours at 50° C.-60° C. The temperature was maintained while albumin (343 kg. of 15% solution), sodium chloride (716 g), glycine (21.6 kg.), sodium phosphate dibasic (85 g), sodium phosphate monobasic (83 g), and thimerosal (100 g) were dissolved. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 6.9±0.1 with IN sodium hydroxide, and water was added to a final weight of 1019 kg. The solution was sterile filtered while hot and filled into bottles.
The procedure of Example I was repeated in all essential details, except 3.0 kg. of 260 Bloom gelatin was substituted for 8.0 kg. of 100 Bloom gelatin. The procedure resulted in a suspending medium having good antibody-enhancing characteristics.
The suspending medium described in Example I was tested by blood bank laboratories in over 1700 assays involving identification of representative samples of all major blood groups. The tests were designed to confirm the efficacy of the solution and compare it to standard procedures employed by blood banks. Cells and serums were obtained from patient samples routinely submitted to the laboratory. No selection of patient population by age, sex, medication, disease state, etc. was made. The basic testing performed on patient samples included an autocontrol consisting of the patients' cells with autologous serum, a direct antiglobulin test on patients' cells and an antibody screen on the patients' serum. If the antibody screen was positive, an antibody identification panel was employed to attempt to identify the specificity of the antibody.
Assays were conducted by adding to a test tube 2 drops of patient serum, 1 drop of 3%-5% saline cell suspension, and 4 drops of the suspending medium. Where sufficient patient sample was available, two tubes were prepared for each sample. One tube was centrifuged immediately, examined immediately after centrifugation, after 10 minutes at room temperature, and again after 5 minutes at 5° C. The second tube was examined after 15 minutes at 37° C. and again after washing and addition of anti-human (Coombs) serum. When insufficient sample was available for two tube testing, one tube was used. The tube was examined immediately after centrifugation, after room temperature incubation (10 minutes), after incubation at 37° C. for 15 minutes, and again after washing and addition of the anti-human serum.
Parallel samples were assayed by standard methods conventionally employed in the laboratory. These involved either a saline method, employing physiological saline or a "high protein" method, employing 22% or 30% albumin. In the saline procedure, each tube received 2 drops of patient serum and 1 drop of 3%-5% saline cell suspension. In the high protein procedure, each tube received 2 drops of patient serum, 3 drops of albumin solution, and 1 drop of 3%-5% saline cell suspension.
Reactions were observed using some type of optical aid such as an agglutination viewer. The reactions were read macroscopically and graded as follows:
4+=One large cell button that remains intact on gentle suspension.
3+=Several large agglutinates of cells on gentle resuspension.
2+=Many small agglutinates of approximately equal size, clear background.
1+=Many small but definite agglutinates, finely granular appearance, opaque reddish background.
±=Minute agglutinates, many unagglutinated cells.
-=Negative reaction. No agglutination.
Interpretation: Positive--Cells agglutinated Negative--No agglutination. Intermediate gradations using superscript "s" for stronger and "w" for weaker were used; e.g., 1s, 1w, etc., creating a total of twelve agglutination strengths (12 point scale).
The results of the tests were reported and grouped according to each antibody. The data was summarized and comparisons to standard tests were made. The performance of the suspending medium of the present invention as compared to standard procedures are listed in Table I. The first column of Table I indicates the particular antibody-antigen reaction observed, column 2 indicates the point at which an observation was made: LT=after five minutes incubation at 5° C., RT=after 10 minutes incubation at room temperature, 37=after 15 minutes at 37° C., AG=after cell washing and addition of anti-human serum. Columns 3 and 4 indicate the performance of the solution of present invention to standard procedures for antibody screen results and panel results. In the subcolumn under >Std., the percentage of expected positive reactions which were significantly stronger than the standard procedure (i.e. having a reaction strength separated by at least a 1+ difference) are listed. Likewise, the subcolumn under=Std. lists the percentage of expected positive reactions for the test medium equivalent to the standard procedure (i.e. separated by less than 1+ difference), and the subcolumn under <Std. lists the percentage of expected positive reactions for the test medium significantly weaker than the standard procedure (separated by greater than 1+ difference). Note that a positive test is always considered significant over negative test even if the reaction strengths differ by less than 1+. A positive reaction is defined as any reaction having a strength of ± or greater.
Although the performance of the suspending medium of this invention varied from one antibody to another, overall, the solution performed significantly better than standard procedures. Each antibody/antigen group was assayed at all four phases for evaluation purposes. Under normal testing conditions, those skilled in the art recognize that certain phases are more reliable for antibodies having certain blood group specificities. In Table I, the phases conventionally used for particular antibodies are indicated by asterisks.
In this example, a procedure employing the suspending medium described in Example I was compared to procedures employing low ionic strength saline plus glycine, low strength saline plus albumin, and standard procedures as described in Example II.
Serums were selected based on prior data indicating the presence of specific antibodies, without regard to patient sex, age, disease states, etc. Red cells were commercial reagent screening cells having known antigenic compositions. Reactions were rated on a twelve point system as described in Example II except that reaction strengths were expressed on a linear scale from negative (0) to 12(4+).
The experimental results are reported in Table II. Solution A is the suspending medium described in Example I. Solution B is a commercial phosphate buffered low ionic strength saline solution containing glycine and a preservative. Solution C is a commercial phosphate buffered low ionic strength saline solution containing 5% albumin. The Standard Method involves initial reaction in physiological saline, followed by addition of 3 drops of 30% albumin for the 37° C. incubation, then conversion to antiglobulin (Coombs) testing.
All assays were one tube tests. Procedures using the suspending medium described in Example I were conducted as described in Example III. In procedures using Solution B, cells were meshed with physiological saline and a 3% cell suspension in Solution B was prepared. Two drops of serum was added to one drop of the cell suspension. The cells were centrifuged and observed after 10 minutes incubation at room temperature, resuspended and reexamined after incubation at 37° C. for 15 minutes, and then converted to antiglobulin (Coombs) testing. In procedures using Solution C, two drops of serum were mixed with one drop of a 3-5% suspension of cells in physiological saline and four drops of Solution C were added. The reactions were examined in the same manner as with Solution B.
The reaction scores listed in Table II indicate that the suspending medium of the present invention results in greater sensitivity than the other media, and the test totals demonstrate an overall superiority.
TABLE I______________________________________Anti- Antibody Screen Results Panel Resultsbody Phase >Std =Std <Std >Std =Std <Std______________________________________D LTRT 7 7 7 0 0 037 0 0 29 5 0 26AG* 50 43 0 43 52 4C LTRT37AG* 60 0 0-c LTRT 3 22 037 3 22 0AG* 50 50 0 19 63 3E LT 33 0 0 15 7 0RT 38 0 0 69 6 337 13 25 13 13 26 3AG* 25 75 0 54 77 0-e LTRT37 0 0 45AG* 0 90 10M LT 0 0 0 3 39 0RT* 75 25 0 66 10 337 25 0 0 50 6 1AG 0 25 25 22 37 3N LT 30 0 0RT* 33 48 1537 67 0 0AGS LT 80 20RT* 10037 100AG 100P1LT 0 25 0 20 74 6RT* 25 75 0 22 52 737 25 0 75 0 26 7AG* 0 25 50 9 37 11LeaLTRT* 8 42 25 6 39 1937 8 17 50 7 65 31AG* 13 33 50 9 40 24LebLTRT 17 22 6 16 41 2237 11 11 22 12 27 25AG* 6 17 17 13 35 21K LT 0 0 17 30 10 0RT 8 33 8 6 36 337 8 33 0 6 25 0AG* 33 67 0 17 78 3-k LTRT37AG* 80 20 0KpaLTRT37AG* 0 67 33FyaLTRT37AG* 35 65 0______________________________________
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________ 10 minutes 15 minutes AntiglobulinTEST PHASE → Room Temperature 37° C. Serum Sol'n. Sol'n. Sol'n. Standard Sol'n. Sol'n. Sol'n. Standard Sol'n. Sol'n. Sol'n. StandardTEST METHOD → A B C Method A B C Method A B C Method__________________________________________________________________________AntibodyAnti-D 10 3 6 0 9 3 6 6 10 11 10 8Anti-D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 9 3Anti-D + C 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 10 11 9Anti-E 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 0Anti-e 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 3 3Anti-M 10 5 12 0 9 1 9 1 8 0 4 3Anti-S 6 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 2Anti-P1 6 3 5 3 5 3 0 0 3 1 1 3Anti-Lea 10 9 9 7 6 3 4 3 1 3 0 3Anti-LebH 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Anti-K 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 11 9 11 12Anti-Fya 3 4 3 0 4 3 7 0 5 5 3 6Anti-Jka 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 11 9 3Total Score 47 28 42 10 45 10 27 14 73 57 64 55__________________________________________________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3565987 *||Oct 20, 1967||Feb 23, 1971||Organon||Immunochemical determinations of antigens and antibodies|
|US3970427 *||Mar 22, 1973||Jul 20, 1976||American Hospital Supply Corporation||Process for reducing sticking of blood cells to glass in blood testing procedures|
|US3987159 *||Mar 1, 1974||Oct 19, 1976||Schering Aktiengesellschaft||Stable sensitized erythrocytes and preparation means|
|US4003988 *||Jun 1, 1976||Jan 18, 1977||Warner-Lambert Company||Direct agglutination test for pregnancy|
|US4081525 *||Aug 16, 1976||Mar 28, 1978||Beckman Instruments, Inc.||Radioimmunoassay of plasma steroids|
|US4088746 *||Nov 11, 1976||May 9, 1978||Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.||Radioimmunoassay for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)|
|US4102810 *||Mar 26, 1976||Jul 25, 1978||Coulter Electronics, Inc.||Stabilized hematological reagent solutions|
|US4139606 *||May 24, 1976||Feb 13, 1979||Zichis Joseph||Preparation of antigen and test for heterophil antibody|
|US4140754 *||Nov 8, 1976||Feb 20, 1979||Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.||Hemagglutination-inhibition test for togaviruses|
|US4170454 *||Mar 30, 1978||Oct 9, 1979||Union Carbide Corporation||Process for the preparation of a solid-phase radioimmunoassay support and use thereof|
|US4202872 *||Mar 1, 1977||May 13, 1980||Leuven Research & Development V.Z.W.||Determination of heparin in blood plasma|
|US4259207 *||Sep 19, 1979||Mar 31, 1981||American Hospital Supply Corporation||Suspending medium for immunologic reactions|
|1||*||"Technical Manual of the American Association of Blood Banks," 7th ed., W. V. Miller, ed., Am. Assn. of Blood Banks, Wash. D. C., p. 167 (1977).|
|2||*||Atchley, W. A. et al., J. Immunology, vol. 93, pp. 701-712 (1964).|
|3||*||Branch, D., Laboratory Med., vol. 9, p. 17 (Apr. 1978).|
|4||*||Elliot, M. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 9, pp. 396-414 (1964).|
|5||*||Fisk, R. J. et al., J. Clin. Path., vol. 17, pp. 737-740 (1947).|
|6||*||Fitzsimmons, J. M. et al., Transfusion, vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 81-85 (1979).|
|7||*||Garratty, G. et al., Clinical Res., vol. 26, p. 347a, (1978).|
|8||*||Greendyke, R. M. et al., Transfusion, vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 782-786 (1978).|
|9||*||Herron, R. et al., J. Clin. Path., vol. 31, pp. 1116-1117 (Nov. 1978).|
|10||*||Hughes-Jones, N. C. et al., Immunology, vol. 7, pp. 72-81 (1964).|
|11||*||Hughes-Jones, N. C. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 9, pp. 385-395 (1964).|
|12||*||Issitt, P. O. et al., Advances in Immunohematology, vol. 6, No. 1 (Prepared Mar. 1978).|
|13||*||Jorgensen, J. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 36, pp. 186-191 (1980).|
|14||*||Jorgensen, J. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 37, pp. 111-115 (1979).|
|15||*||Lincoln, P. J. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 34, pp. 221-226 (1978).|
|16||*||Low, B. et al., Vox Sang., vol. 26, pp. 53-61 (1974).|
|17||*||Moore, H. C. et al., Transfusion, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 291-296 (1976).|
|18||*||Pliska, C., Laboratory Med., vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 159-164 (1980).|
|19||*||Rock, G. et al., Transfusion, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 228-232 (1978).|
|20||*||Wicker, B. et al., Transfusion, vol. 16, pp. 469-472 (1976).|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4579824 *||May 18, 1983||Apr 1, 1986||Louderback Allan Lee||Hematology control|
|US4859604 *||Aug 27, 1987||Aug 22, 1989||Ampor, Inc.||Composition for stabilization of diagnostic reagents|
|US4956299 *||Dec 31, 1986||Sep 11, 1990||Ciba Corning Diagnostics Corp.||Complement stabilization|
|US5411894 *||Mar 20, 1990||May 2, 1995||Abbott Laboratories||Method of using tissue and cell adhesive preparations for biological test systems|
|US6030845 *||Jul 28, 1997||Feb 29, 2000||Horiba Ltd.||Immunoassay method for lysed whole blood|
|US6106778 *||Sep 25, 1998||Aug 22, 2000||Horiba, Ltd.||Blood cell count/immunoassay apparatus using whole blood|
|US6855562||Feb 24, 2000||Feb 15, 2005||Horiba, Ltd.||Immunoassay method for lyzed whole blood|
|US7326579||Dec 30, 2004||Feb 5, 2008||Horiba, Ltd.||Immunoassay method for lyzed whole blood|
|US8802385 *||Jun 22, 2007||Aug 12, 2014||Grifols, S.A.||Suspension medium for red blood cells comprising amino acids|
|US20050118732 *||Dec 30, 2004||Jun 2, 2005||Yasuo Yamao||Immunoassay method for lyzed whole blood|
|US20060127960 *||Sep 3, 2003||Jun 15, 2006||Defense Research & Development Organisation||Process for preparation of an agglutination reagent for rapid detection of typhoid|
|US20070298406 *||Jun 22, 2007||Dec 27, 2007||Grifols, S.A.||Suspension medium for red blood cells|
|US20110045455 *||Feb 24, 2011||Grifols, S.A.||Suspension medium for red blood cells|
|EP0280559A2 *||Feb 26, 1988||Aug 31, 1988||EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY (a New Jersey corporation)||Agglutination immunoassay and kit for determination of a multivalent immune species using a buffered salt wash solution|
|WO1997005485A1 *||Aug 2, 1996||Feb 13, 1997||Trinity Biotech U.K. Limited||A specimen dilution indicator system for use in clinical diagnostic assays|
|WO1997032213A1 *||Feb 27, 1997||Sep 4, 1997||Majesco Biologicals, Inc.||Blood testing kit|
|U.S. Classification||436/8, 436/513, 435/967, 435/5, 436/17, 436/18, 435/7.25, 514/774, 436/536, 252/408.1, 514/776, 435/7.1, 435/4|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T436/10, Y10T436/108331, Y10T436/107497, Y10S435/967, Y10S436/826, G01N33/5306|
|Sep 8, 1986||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 2, 1987||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BAXTER TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC. A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:AMERICAN HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORPORATION INTO;REEL/FRAME:004760/0345
Effective date: 19870126
|Jan 30, 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC.
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:BAXTER TRAVENOL LABORATORIES, INC., A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:005050/0870
Effective date: 19880518
|Oct 4, 1990||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Mar 11, 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC.
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:005712/0396
Effective date: 19900831
Owner name: BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., A CORP. OF DE;REEL/FRAME:005622/0729
Effective date: 19900831
|Sep 28, 1994||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 13, 1995||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DIAGNOSTICS HOLDING, INC.;DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.;BARTELS, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:007297/0204
Effective date: 19941220
|Jan 20, 1995||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DADE INTERNATIONAL INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC.;REEL/FRAME:007272/0149
Effective date: 19941219
|Jun 1, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DADE BEHRING INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:009328/0921
Effective date: 19980101
Owner name: BADE BEHRING INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:009297/0425
Effective date: 19980101
|Jun 8, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DADE BEHRING INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:009267/0071
Effective date: 19980101
|Aug 20, 1998||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DADE BEHRING INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DADE INTERNATIONAL INC.;REEL/FRAME:009405/0428
Effective date: 19980101
|Sep 15, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BANKERS TRUST COMPANY, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:DADE BEHRING INC.;REEL/FRAME:010231/0085
Effective date: 19990629
|Nov 29, 2002||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DADE BEHRING INC.;REEL/FRAME:013484/0739
Effective date: 20021003
|Mar 18, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHIMERA RESEARCH AND CHEMICAL INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: PATENT RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS;REEL/FRAME:013821/0108
Effective date: 20021003
|May 4, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DADE BEHRING INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST FOR PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:DEUTSCHE BANK AG, NEW YORK BRANCH;REEL/FRAME:015972/0363
Effective date: 20050426