|Publication number||US4396304 A|
|Application number||US 06/324,433|
|Publication date||Aug 2, 1983|
|Filing date||Nov 24, 1981|
|Priority date||Nov 24, 1981|
|Publication number||06324433, 324433, US 4396304 A, US 4396304A, US-A-4396304, US4396304 A, US4396304A|
|Inventors||Keith B. Davenport, Roman Derc|
|Original Assignee||International Computers Limited|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (18), Classifications (10), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates to wire printing apparatus. Such apparatus prints by projecting a printing wire towards a record medium and making an impression in the form of a dot on the record medium. Usually the dots are arranged as characters of the well-known dot-matrix type.
In the usual arrangement the wire is projected towards the record medium by an actuating mechanism consisting essentially of an electromagnet and an armature. The armature is normally held in an open position with the back end of the printing wire biassed against it. When it is desired to cause the print wire to make a dot, current is passed through the coil of the electromagnet and the armature is attracted towards the electromagnet, carrying the print wire with it. The armature is brought to a stop against the electromagnet but the print wire continues, projected towards the record medium with the kinetic energy already imparted to it.
The source of the current passed through the coil of the electromagnet is a drive circuit. Hitherto, drive circuits have used predetermined voltage drive circuits and predetermined current drive circuits. In a voltage drive circuit the coil is switched between two voltage rails for a predetermined time. During this period the current rises at a rate determined by the voltage and the inductance and resistance of the coil. In a current drive circuit the arrangement is similar, but the peak current is limited to a predetermined value.
These circuits are relatively inefficient, defining efficiency for this purpose as the percentage of the energy supplied to the drive circuit that is passed on to the print wire. The more inefficient the drive circuit, the larger is the power supply that is necessary and the greater is the heat dissipation within the head assembly. This last factor is especially disadvantageous as limiting the repetition rate at which drive signals can be applied to the head.
According to this invention the drive circuit has a capacitor which is charged to a predetermined voltage by a charging path containing an inductor and switching means arranged to interrupt charging of the capacitor when that voltage is reached. The actuator coil is situated in a discharge path from the capacitor which is closed for a predetermined period to actuate the print wire. During this period the current in the discharge path increases to a maximum and starts to fall away. The circuit provides a controlled amount of energy to actuate the print wire, and a relatively uniform force on the armature, both of which increase the efficiency of the circuit.
An example of wire printing apparatus in accordance with the invention will now be described in greater detail with reference to the drawings, in which
FIG. 1 is an exploded view of the print head of the apparatus;
FIG. 2 is a section through the print head;
FIG. 3 is a circuit diagram of the drive circuit;
FIG. 4 is a graph of the current flow through the actuator coil;
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect on efficiency of variation in the voltage across the capacitor, and
FIGS. 6 and 7 are circuit diagrams of modifications of the circuit of FIG. 3.
Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 2 of the drawings, the wire printing apparatus has a print head 1 carried on a main mounting plate 2. The plate 2 carries a number of U-shaped electromagnet yoke assemblies 3, each built up from a number of laminations, the bases of the U-shapes being held in apertures 4 in the plate 2. A coil assembly 5 is positioned on each limb of the yoke assemblies 3. An end plate 6 is spaced away from the main plate 2 by spacers 7 and the plate 6 carries, by means of dowel pins 8, an armature support frame 9. A fixing screw 33 secures the frame 9 to the plate 6. The frame 9 has a number of peripheral fingers 10, one for each yoke 3 and the fingers 10 each have a pair of recessed lugs 11, turned inwardly to face the yokes 3. The recesses 12 in the lugs 11 accommodate projecting pivots 13 of armatures 14, the arrangement of the frame 9 being such that each armature 14 is pivoted adjacent a corresponding one of the yokes 3. Each armature 14 has a projection 15 carrying an ear 16.
A nose piece 17 is secured to the main plate 2 and projects outwardly on the opposite side of the plate 2 from the yokes 3, being secured to the plate 2 by screws 18. The nose piece carries a pair of intermediate wire guides 19 and a terminal wire guide 20. The guides 19 and 20 have a number of guide holes 21 for printing wires 22, the terminal guide 20 having its guide holes in any configuration, for example of holes in a vertical line, and the intermediate guides 19 have wire guide holes arranged in a suitable configuration to permit the wires 22 to be aligned at one end each with the ear 16 of a corresponding one of the armatures 14, the other ends of the wires 22 projecting from the terminal guide 20.
That end of each wire 22 adjacent the ear 16 of the corresponding armature 14 is fitted with a ferrule 23 which bears against the ear 16 under the influence of a return spring 24, so that the effect of energising the electromagnet coils 5 is to attract the appropriate armature towards the electromagnet from a normal open position to a closed position, driving its associated printing wire 22 with it. When the armature is brought to a halt in the closed position, the print wire continues with the kinetic energy already imparted to it towards a printing position at which it strikes a conventional record member 25 (as best seen in FIG. 2) through a transfer medium such as a printing ribbon 26, to make a mark on the record. Once the coils 5 are de-energised, the return spring 24 restores the wire 22 into its retracted position.
A non-magnetic member 27 is provided, having a projecting ear 28 corresponding to each coil position within the head, each ear 28 being interposed between the ends of the yoke assemblies 3 and the associated armature 14 to provide a conventional residual non-magnetic gap spacer against which the armature bears in the closed position. The end plate 6 is provided with a ring of threaded holes 29 each aligned with a corresponding hole 30 in the armature support frame 9. A resilient plug 31, carried in each of the holes 30, forms a backstop damper for each of the armatures. Screws 32 in the holes 29 of the end plate 6 are provided for the adjustment of the position of the dampers 31, and consequently the air gap separating the open and closed positions. The rear of the head assembly is protected by a cover 34. Connections of the coils 5 are conveniently arranged by the use of a printed wiring board 35 which is secured to the main plate 2 by rivets 36 and spacers 37, the board 35 being formed at one edge with connection fingers to receive a suitable socket (not shown).
Referring to FIG. 3, the drive circuit provides a capacitor C1 which is charged through a charging path consisting of a transistor switch T2, diode D3 and an inductor L1 from an unregulated power supply connected between a zero line Z and a Vcc line. A discharge path for the capacitor C1 through a load L2, is provided by diodes D1, diode D6 and transistor switch T1. The load L2 represents the coils 5 of one of the print wire actuators of FIGS. 1 and 2. Other parts of the circuit will be described in the following description of the operation of the circuit.
Assuming that the capacitor C1 is already charged, the actuator coil L2 is energised by applying a positive pulse to the base of transistor switch T1. This pulse turns T1 on so that current flows from capacitor C1 via diode D1 through the actuator coil L2 and thence through diode D6 and transistor T1 to the zero line Z. During this discharge, transistor T2 is held non-conductive by the voltage drop across diode D1. Termination of the positive pulse on the base of transistor T1 turns T1 off to a non-conductive condition. When transistor T1 is turned off, current will continue to flow through the actuator coil L2 and is returned to a line Vee connected to a regulated voltage power supply having a higher potential than Vcc. This current flow continues to hold transistor T2 in a non-conductive condition due to the voltage drop developed across diode D1.
The base of transistor T2 is connected to the line Vee through a resistor R1 so that when the current through the actuator coil L2, and hence through the diode D1, falls to zero transistor T2 is turned on and becomes conductive to permit the capacitor to be charged through the charging path consisting of inductor L1, diode D3 and transistor T2 from the power line Vcc.
A potential divider consisting of potentiometer RV1 and resistors R2 and R3 is connected between Vee and the zero line Z to provide on slider S a preset variable potential. A by-pass capacitor C2 is connected between the slider S and the zero line Z. As the capacitor C1 is charged, the potential C1 at the junction J rises to a value relative to the present potential on the slider S such that the emitter/base junction of transistor T2 is biassed to divert the base current of transistor T2 through diode D4 to the slider S. The transistor T2 is thereby turned off and charging of C1 ceases. Diodes D3 and D6 are connected to the collector connections to transistors T2 and T1 respectively to prevent reverse bias on the collector/base junctions of these transistors.
While the capacitor C1 is being charged the current in the charging path behaves in a manner determined by the characteristics of the series LC circuit containing L1 and C1. The current increases against the inductance of L1 until the voltage across C1 is approximately Vcc. The current then continues to flow, but at a decreasing rate, until the voltage across C1 reaches the level at which T2 is caused to switch off. The magnetic energy still remaining in the inductor L1 at that point is then returned to the power supply Vee by a current flowing through D5.
The time taken to charge the capacitor C1 is determined by the parameters of the charging circuit, principally the inductance of L1, the capacitance of C1 and the ratio of the switch-off voltage across C1 to the voltage Vcc. It can be selected to be less than the time taken for a print wire to retract from the printing position to its rest position, so that it does not cause any delay if it is desired to operate the print wire again as soon as possible after its previous operation.
The energy stored in the capacitor C1 is accurately controlled by the setting of the slider S, which governs the voltage across the capacitor when T2 is turned off.
The time during which the capacitor C1 discharges through the actuator coil L2 is also accurately controlled and is equal to the width t of the actuating pulse applied to the base of the transistor T1 to turn it on. It is arranged to be substantially equal to the time taken for the armature to complete its movement and close the air gap.
The behaviour of the current in the discharge path is as shown in FIG. 4. It is determined by the characteristics of the series LC circuit containing L2 and C1. It rises to a maximum against the inductance of L2 and then falls as the capacitor C1 discharges further. After the transistor T2 has turned off at time t the energy remaining in the actuator coils L2 is returned to the power supply Vee by a current through D2, shown dotted in FIG. 4.
This behaviour, by which the current falls during the latter part of the actuating pulse, is an important distinction from the prior predetermined voltage and current drive circuits. In the first of those circuits the current increases continuously and in the second it increases to a limit and thereafter remains constant. Now the force exerted on the armature, for constant current, increases as the gap closes. We find that an arrangement in which the current falls during the latter part of the armature movement tends to counteract this increase in attractive force and leads to a more uniform force. That increased uniformity, we find, leads to greater efficiency by reducing stray fields and losses and increasing the proportion of the energy input to the drive circuit that is transferred to the print wire.
The fact that the energy stored in the capacitor is precisely controlled is an essential feature of the invention and ensures that the energy imparted to the print wire is precisely known and therefore that the energy input can be made no greater than required.
Additional factors of the apparatus described with reference to the drawings that assist in improving efficiency are the fact that T1 is switched off at substantially the instant the gap closes (switch-off later leads to unecessary losses as current flows through the coil after the gap has closed, whereas too early a switch-off leads to the need for greater forces than would otherwise be necessary) and the return of surplus energy in the inductor L1 and coil L2 to the Vee line.
Referring to FIG. 5, the predetermined value of the voltage to which the capacitor C1 is charged is chosen to be such as to maximise the efficiency of the circuit, that is the proportion of the energy accepted by the circuit that is transferred to the print wire. By "energy accepted" is meant the total energy input into the drive circuit less the energy returned via the diodes D2 and D5. Thus if the voltage across the capacitor is arranged to be V2, the efficiency will be a maximum. However, as the change in efficiency for variations in voltage near V2 is small, substantially as good an efficiency can be obtained if the voltage varies somewhat, for example to V1 or V3. This is useful because the energy imparted to the print wire varies in an approximately linear manner with respect to the voltage and by varying the voltage near V2, by adjusting the slider S, the density of the print impression may be altered without significantly affecting the efficiency.
As an example, in one specific embodiment of the apparatus being described, the value of V2 is 70 volts and the corresponding efficiency is 11%. At V1 =65 V and V3 =75 V the efficiency has fallen to 9.9%.
The armature air-gap may also be adjusted, by varying the setting of the backstop 31. It is found that there is one particular setting which minimises the time taken for the armature to close. This setting takes account of component tolerances, and by setting the air-gaps of all the armatures to give the minimum gap-closure time it can be ensured that the tips of all print wires, that are fired simultaneously, arrive at the print surface at very closely the same time, giving good dot alignment.
The optimisation of the efficiency of the apparatus is preferably carried out more widely than simply with respect to the capacitor charging voltage and air-gap setting. Starting from a desired print-wire mass and launch energy, time of gap closure and overall dimensions of the actuator, the other characteristics such as the dimensions of the yoke of the electromagnet, the number of turns of the electromagnet coils and the diameter of the wire used, together with the armature dimensions, may be selected as a set to optimise the efficiency. With such an optimised set alteration of any one component will reduce the efficiency, even if another component is altered to ensure that the initial requirements are still met.
The optimum setting may be discovered by systematic experiment, but is desirably carried out by calculation bearing in mind the mechanical and electromagnetic properties of the system and will yield the charging voltage of C1 and the air-gap setting. The latter may then be adjusted as described to account for tolerances. The fact that the calculation is possible is a consequence of the controlled nature of the energy input to the system and discharge from it.
The capacitance of C1 may be chosen arbitrarily, within reasonably wide limits, and will then determine L1 from the need for C1 to be charged in the required time. It will be one of the initial constraints on the optimisation of the other components.
Whilst the power supply connected to the line Vee generally needs to be voltage stabilised in order to define the input energy to the actuator coil with the required precision, the current drawn from this power supply is relatively low. Conversely the power supply connected to the line Vcc is required to deliver high current to provide energy for the actuator coil but generally does not need to be voltage stabilised.
Two possible modicications will now be described. Fixed print intensity may be provided by replacing the potential divider arrangement R2, RV1, R3 of FIG. 3 with the circuit of FIG. 6, which may be used to control the capacitor voltage of all the drive circuits.
The circuit of FIG. 7 allows the current returned to Vee to be switched to Vcc if it exceeds the current being drawn from Vcc during charging of C1.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3158791 *||Oct 4, 1962||Nov 24, 1964||Deneen Jr Raymond J||Energy recovery coil driver|
|US3374402 *||Oct 7, 1964||Mar 19, 1968||English Electro Leo Marconi Co||Data printing apparatus|
|US3405327 *||Oct 19, 1965||Oct 8, 1968||Atomic Energy Commission Usa||Pulse energizing and energy recovery system for an electromagnet|
|US3507213 *||Oct 16, 1967||Apr 21, 1970||English Electric Computers Ltd||High speed flying hammer solenoid systems|
|US3889793 *||Jun 14, 1973||Jun 17, 1975||Honeywell Inf Systems||Mosaic printing head|
|US3900095 *||May 31, 1973||Aug 19, 1975||Citizen Watch Co Ltd||Driving circuits for electrical printers|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4518269 *||Sep 30, 1982||May 21, 1985||Epson Corporation||Serial printer|
|US4552064 *||Oct 21, 1983||Nov 12, 1985||Sanders Royden C Jun||Dot matrix printers and print heads therefor|
|US4681467 *||Jul 25, 1986||Jul 21, 1987||International Business Machinces Corporation||Impact printing applications|
|US4755068 *||Jan 30, 1987||Jul 5, 1988||Dh Technology, Inc.||Dot matrix print head assembly|
|US4767227 *||Jan 27, 1986||Aug 30, 1988||Seiko Epson Corporation||Print wire driving device for wire type dot printer|
|US4838714 *||Feb 17, 1988||Jun 13, 1989||Nixodorg Computer Ag||Needle print head|
|US4877342 *||Mar 9, 1988||Oct 31, 1989||Facit Aktiebolag||Method of moving print elements in printheads and a printhead with moving mechanism for print elements|
|US5024543 *||May 24, 1989||Jun 18, 1991||Seiko Epson Corporation||Impact dot print head|
|US5071268 *||Oct 26, 1989||Dec 10, 1991||Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.||Wire-dot print head driving apparatus having sensing coils|
|US5149213 *||Apr 29, 1991||Sep 22, 1992||Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Noise reducing back stopper for an impact print head|
|US5149214 *||Dec 13, 1989||Sep 22, 1992||Seiko Epson Corporation||Print wire driving apparatus|
|US6561707||May 30, 2001||May 13, 2003||Compuprint Spa||Needle printing head|
|US8953217||Oct 20, 2009||Feb 10, 2015||Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh||Device and method for printing a wrapper strip|
|DE102008052421A1 *||Oct 21, 2008||Apr 22, 2010||Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh||Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bedrucken eines Banderolenstreifens|
|EP0373870A2 *||Dec 12, 1989||Jun 20, 1990||Seiko Epson Corporation||Dot wire driving apparatus|
|EP0418433A1 *||Sep 18, 1989||Mar 27, 1991||MANNESMANN Aktiengesellschaft||Wire matrix print head|
|EP1160087A1||May 25, 2001||Dec 5, 2001||COMPUPRINT S.p.A.||Needle printing head|
|WO1985002584A1 *||Nov 28, 1984||Jun 20, 1985||Ncr Co||Wire matrix print head|
|U.S. Classification||400/124.05, 400/124.22, 101/93.05, 400/157.2|
|International Classification||B41J2/275, B41J2/30|
|Cooperative Classification||B41J2/275, B41J2/30|
|European Classification||B41J2/30, B41J2/275|
|Mar 22, 1982||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DATA RECORDING INSTRUMENT COMPANY LIMITED HAWTHORN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DAVENPORT, KEITH B.;DERC, ROMAN;REEL/FRAME:003954/0946
Effective date: 19820203
Owner name: DATA RECORDING INSTRUMENT COMPANY LIMITED THE, ST
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DAVENPORT, KEITH B.;DERC, ROMAN;REEL/FRAME:003954/0946
Effective date: 19820203
|Jan 27, 1987||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 5, 1991||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 4, 1991||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 15, 1991||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19910804