Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS4499853 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 06/559,720
Publication dateFeb 19, 1985
Filing dateDec 9, 1983
Priority dateDec 9, 1983
Fee statusPaid
Publication number06559720, 559720, US 4499853 A, US 4499853A, US-A-4499853, US4499853 A, US4499853A
InventorsEdward A. Miller
Original AssigneeRca Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Distributor tube for CVD reactor
US 4499853 A
Abstract
An apparatus for chemically vapor-depositing silicon material on surfaces of a plurality of substrates arranged in a stack that is continuously rotating. A gas distributor formed of a pair of coaxially tubes, in fixed relation with the rotating substrates, provides a pair of gas streams from a pair of parallel slots extending lengthwise of the tube facing the substrates. Gas input through the inner tube is passed through holes conducting gas from the inner tube to the outer tube and into the chamber as two gas streams. Substantially uniform deposition is achieved within ±5% with gas high deposition rates effected by high flow gas streams that are not turbulent.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(4)
What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for chemically vapor-depositing a material onto surfaces of a plurality of substrates spaced apart in a stacked parallel array within a reaction chamber, wherein said substrates are heated while contacting said surfaces with a gaseous compound of said material to be deposited, said apparatus having means for rotating said substrates about an axis perpendicular to said substrates, and coaxial tubular means extending parallel to said substrate axis for providing a flow of gas carrying said material, the improvement wherein:
said coaxial tubular means comprises a first inner tube fixed coaxially within a second outer tube in fixed position within said chamber;
said first tube having a plurality of openings located along a path extending longitudinally along the surface of the first tube to direct gas in a plurality of gas streams to the inner wall of said second tube;
said second tube having at least two slots parallel to each other and extending longitudinally along the surface of the second tube facing said substrates to provide at least two overlapping gas streams directed towards said stack of substrates such as to pass through the spacing between the substrates and pass over the surfaces of said rotating substrates, the width of each slot being selected so that the velocity of the gas streams flowing through said slots onto said substrates is substantially free of turbulence, whereby the thickness of the deposited material on each substrate surface is substantially uniform and the deposition rate can be significantly high.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 further including means for controlling the volumetric rate of gas flow of about 250 liters per minute to a maximum velocity of about 700 centimeters per second without turbulence through said tubes wherein the width of each tube is such that the thickness of the deposited material is uniform over the surface of each of said surfaces to within ±5%.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 further including means for providing said gaseous compound such that said gas contains about 1 to 2% by volume of silicon tetrachloride and further including means for controlling the volumetric rate of gas flow through said tube to a maximum velocity without turbulence such that said deposition rate is within the range 1.0 to 2.0 micrometers per minute.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said second tube has three slots extending longitudinally along the surface, each slot extending parallel to the other two slots and positioned so that three partially overlapping gas streams are directed to said substrates.
Description

This invention relates to chemical vapor deposition (CVD) reactors and more particularly to a novel distributor tube of the gaseous compound used in the reactor.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a method of forming a layer of material on a substrate, such as an epitaxial layer on a silicon wafer, wherein deposits are produced by heterogeneous gas-solid or gas-liquid chemical reactions at the surface of the substrate. One form of structure for achieving CVD processing is a rotary disc reactor in which a number of stacked parallel graphite discs serving as susceptors carry silicon wafers on one or both sides of the discs is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,062,318 and 4,082,865 issued Dec. 13, 1977 and Apr. 4, 1978, respectively. The stacked susceptor structure is enclosed within a quartz tube surrounded by an RF induction heating coil. A gas manifold is provided with a plurality of gas nozzles for the injection of the gas into peripheral proportions of the stacked discs. The gas manifold and thus the nozzles in prior art rotary reactor structures are oscillated to spread the gas plume uniformly over the surface of the susceptor discs and wafers carried on the discs. The RF coil inductively heats the graphite discs by inductive process through the wall of the quartz tube.

The gas carrying the material is conveyed into the reaction chamber by means of gas tube manifolds that are provided with slots, openings or nozzles that are positioned to generate gas streams that flow over the surface of the wafers or substrates. In typical rotary disc reactor apparatus, the gas manifold tubes are oscillated to sweep a gas stream over the rotating wafers or substrates. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,082,865 for a gas manifold using a single tube with nozzles for generating the gas streams. See also U.S. Pat. No. 4,401,689 for apparatus using a coaxial gas manifold tube means wherein the gas is first introduced into the chamber through an inner tube and then passed to an outer tube or shroud which provides a gas stream through a series of holes or slots while the tube is oscillated back and forth over the surface of the wafers or substrates.

The use of slotted, oscillating gas manifolds have been used with certain degrees of success with wafers of limited size, on the order of 21/2 to 3 inches in diameter. However, the uniformity of thickness and the growth rates of such single slot gas manifold tubes are limited by the maximum gas velocity that they can handle without developing turbulence and poor deposition properties.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the present invention, an apparatus for chemically vapor depositing a material onto stacked substrates in a rotary disc reactor includes a first tube for carrying the gas into the chamber and a second tube coaxially disposed about the first tube. Gas is passed from the first tube to the second tube by means of a plurality of longitudinally spaced openings. The second tube is provided with at least two slots extending lengthwise of the tube and facing in the direction of the stacked substrates. The tubes are in fixed position relative to the substrates which are rotated during the deposition process. The width of each slot in the tube is selected so that the velocity of the gas streams flowing through the slots is substantially free or turbulence whereby the thickness of the deposit material is substantially uniform and the deposition rate of the material on the substrates can be significantly high on the order of 1.5 to 2 micrometers per minute. The thickness of the deposited material is uniform to within ±5%.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIG. 1 is a fragmentary view of a rotary disc reactor embodying the present invention; and

FIG. 2 is a plan view of one substrate in operative relation with the distributed tube shown in FIG. 1 as seen along viewing line 2--2 of FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Refer to FIG. 1 in which there is shown a fragmentary portion of a typical rotary disc reactor of the type described in detail, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,082,865 identified above and incorporated herein by reference. The reaction chamber 11 is formed by a housing 12 typically formed of quartz material about which is provided RF coil 14 formed of a plurality of turns 16. The RF coil 14 is suitably energized with RF current according to conventional design. The plurality of substrates, typically wafers 16, 18, 20 and 22, are supported in pair relation on a graphite susceptor 24, 26, etc., each supported on suitable supported posts 28 and 30. Typically at least three such posts are needed to support the stack of wafers. Each pair of wafers sandwiches a center plug 32, 34, etc., to provide structural strength to support the wafers and to provide good conductivity of heat generated in the susceptors in response to RF energy from the coils 14. A gas distributor 40 is located adjacent the stacked array of wafers in a fixed position and extending longitudinally of the chamber 14 and parallel to the axis of rotaton 17 of the stacked array of wafers. The distributor 40 is formed of an outer tube 44 and an inner tube 42 in coaxial relation with each other. The inner tube 42 carries the gas input as indicated by arrow 52. The inner tube 42 is provided with a series of holes 46 located along a common longitudinal path with a pitch or spacing of about ten holes per inch, each hole having a diameter of 0.05 inch. The holes 46 are positioned so as to pass the gas along the paths 54 as shown in FIG. 1 from the main gas stream 52 to strike the inner wall of the outer tube 44 and be deflected towards the slots 48 and 50 provided in the outer wall of the outer tube 44 as seen better in FIG. 2. The gas streams 56 and 58 exiting through the slots 48 and 50 are represented by arrows.

Each of the slots 48 and 50 are formed in the outer wall of the tube 44 to extend continuously from the bottom to the top of the stacked array of wafers 16, etc. The slots are typically 0.125 to 0.250 centimeters (0.05 to 0.10 inch) wide and for a stacked array of 20 wafers will be about 17.8 centimeters (7 inches) long.

In the typical operation of the apparatus, a stack of wafers 16, etc., typically 20 in number, will be rotated about axis 17 while gas 52, preferably silicon tetrachloride (SiCl4) in a vehicle of hydrogen is passed into the chamber 11. Typically, the content of silicon tetrachloride is in the range of 1 to 2 percent of the total hydrogen and source gas content. The pressure of the gas is slightly above atmospheric and is typically 1.4 or 1.5 of atmospheric pressure (18 psi). The gas is passed downwardly through the inner tube 42 and exits through the plurality of holes 54 to pass within the tube as shown by the arrows 60 and 62, as shown better in FIG. 2. The gas then exits through the respective slots 48 and 50 to develop two gas streams 56 and 58 as shown in FIG. 2. The angle of the respective gas streams exiting from the slots depends upon the relative position of the slots to the wafer surface and to the spacing between each slot. The manner in which these slots are arranged will now be better understood by the following explanation.

The gas exiting each of the slots 48 and 50 develops a spreading angle φ as shown in FIG. 2. The subscripts 1 and 2 to the parameter being described merely distinguish one slot from the other. Otherwise, the parameters are equal. The spread arc, at a finite distance from the slot, is defined as Wo. The arcuate distance Wo is represented by the following equation:

Wo =Wd +2l tan φ                             (1)

wherein Wd is the arcuate distance at either of the slots 48 and 50 , l is the distance from the slot exit to the edge of the susceptor 24, and φ is the spreading angle. Subscripts 1 and 2 are used on the drawing as just mentioned to identify the parameter related to the respective gas streams developed from the slots 48 and 50.

As the gas stream passes over the surface of the wafer 16, the arcuate spreading distance increases as shown at the center of the wafer by the spreading arc Wx. This spreading arcuate length can be described by the following equation: ##EQU1## wherein D is the diffusion coefficient at a temperature T, VA is the average gas velocity, x is the distance across the wafer 16 including the width of the susceptor 24, and Wo is the arcuate width of the gas stream as defined by equation (1).

For a given design of a reactor, in the practice of the invention, the desired gas delivery will develop a gas velocity depending upon the size, essentially only the width, of the slots 48 and 50. According to general fluid mechanic relationships, the mass gas flow can be represented by the following equation:

Q=(V)×(A)                                            (3)

wherein Q is the mass of the volumetric flow of the gas in liters per minute, V is the velocity of the gas exiting from the respective slots 48 and 50 and A is the area, i.e., the width×length of the slots 48 and 50.

Thus, according to equations (1) and (2), for a given gas flow Q, a slot 48 or 50 of width (Wd) will produce a spread of the gas stream Wx at the center of the wafer 16 as shown in FIG. 2. The edges of the susceptor 24 will disturb the gas flow slightly but will not change the direction of the gas flow. Moreover, the gas flow will produce a particular, specific gas velocity across the wafer 16. It is clear, that since the gas spreads across the surface, the deposition of the desired material specie from the gas flow will not deposit uniformly on the wafer. As the wafer 16 is rotated in the reactor during the deposition of the gas, the inherent non-unformity due to the spreading of the gas is partially reduced. Nevertheless, experiments have shown that the growth of the material on the wafer is consistently thicker on the center of the wafer and thinner on the edge of the wafer. It has also been determined by experiment that a single slot in the tube distributor 40 pointing at the center of the rotating wafer results in a growth rate that varies as a function of the gas velocity wherein the non-uniformity is greatest at the higher velocities. The growth rate is more uniform with lower gas velocities with a consequence, however, that the growth rate is inefficient since it is rather slow. It appears that these low growth rates (e.g., 0.6 μm/minute at the edge and 0.2 μm/minute at the center) with a relatively low velocity of the gas (e.g. 450 cm/sec) is caused by much of the chemicals being decomposed at the leading edge of the portion of the susceptor 24 nearest the exiting slots 48 and 50.

In the prior art to improve the growth rate, the distributor 40 was arranged to be oscillated from side to side in a modulated sweep mode, as described for example in the above-identified patents. In such an oscillation mode, the gas stream approaches the edge of the wafer 16 and cuts across the edge of the wafer before a large amount of the source gas can be heated by the susceptor 24 at temperatures that increase typically from 700° C. to the desired 1150° C. at which epitaxial deposition will be achieved.

In order to optimize chemical efficiency, that is, to place as much silicon from the source gas to provide epitaxial growth on the substrate or wafer 16, the distibutor slot 48 or 50 for designs using only single slots should be pointed directly at the center of the wafer. In experiments performed with such a distributor in which only one slot was used, the development of the epitaxial deposition resulted in a non-uniform growth rate of 1.5 micrometers in the center portion of the wafer and 0.9 micrometers at the edges. One reason for this non-uniformity in growth rate can be based on the geometry of the arrangement and the temperature of the heating gas. In the geometry aspect of the problem, the gas stream is maintained in a direction across the center of the wafer while the edges of the rotating wafer pass momentarily in front of the gas stream whereby only a very small portion of the total exposure time is utilized. With respect to the temperature aspect of the problem, as the gas passes over the edge of the wafer 16 the temperature is cooler than the temperature of the gas passing towards the center. Under these conditions, the growth of the silicon is non-uniform such that the silicon deposits are thicker at the center than at the edges. It is clear that this non-uniform deposition rate is not desirable.

Both of these problems can be solved by, first, increasing the velocity of the gas whereby the growth rate region extends beyond the center to about three quarters of the diameter distance from the exiting slots. However, increasing the gas velocity above values of 700 centimeters per second shows that turbulence in the flow characteristics of the stream develop and moreover, severe cooling of the susceptor stack occurs. These effects have been observed in experiments using smoke mixed with the gas stream to show clearly the turbulence that results from higher gas velocities. According to the present invention, these problems have been solved by providing a plurality of parallel slots in the distributor 40, e.g., only two slots for smaller wafers and directing the gas stream from each slot so that the combination of gas streams just cover the entire wafer surface.

Thus the first gas stream 56 is arranged to be defined by limits 56a and 56b while the second gas stream 58 is arranged to be defined by the limits 58a and 58b as shown in FIG. 2. The overlapping region 59 will of course receive more gaseous material than the regions that are not overlapping. In the region 59, the quantity of gas in the wider portions of the spreading stream has less content of SiCl4 than the narrower portions of the spreading angle. Therefore, the overlapping of two gas spreading angles does not adversely affect the growth rate. Nevertheless, the growth rate in the region 59 can be decreased if desired by decreasing the velocity (VA) of the gas exiting from the slots.

Several experiments were performed to make a comparision between the results of a tube having only one slot as compared to a tube having two slots. These experiments were performed on a four inch square wafer in which the gas flow conditions were the same. Gas was provided to the system at 200 liters per minute at which about 98% of the gas was hydrogen and about 2% was silicon tetrachloride. The width of the respective slots are as shown in the following table resulting in gas velocities of 600 centimeters per second at location Wo for a single slot and 400 centimeters per second for each of the respective two slots.

______________________________________GROWTH RATE (μm/sec)        LOCATION ON        SQUARE WAFER        (10.16 cm. per side)Distributor (40)          Edge   R/2      Center                                Corner______________________________________1 Slot (0.165 cm)   0.85   1.05   1.45  0.762 Slots (0.010 cm)   1.49   1.55   1.59  1.53______________________________________

where R/2 is located 1/2 the distance between the center and an edge.

It is seen from the above table that the two-slot distributor 40 provides epitaxial growth uniformity rate that is much greater than the average total growth rate for a single slot distributor thereby greatly increasing chemical efficiency. The uniformity from the two-slot distributor was within ±5% on all of the measured positions as shown in the table.

In the practice of the invention, growth rates of 1.0 to 2.0 micrometers per minute have been achieved with SiCl4 at 1 to 2% volumetric concentration in hydrogen with ±5% thickness uniformity. However, higher growth rates can be achieved with suitable design and operating conditions as will be apparent to those skilled in this art according to the teachings herein.

In a typical operaton of the system using two parallel slots, the gas flow is 250 liters per minute with each slot having a width of 0.10 centimeters resulting in a gas velocity starting at the edge of the rotating wafers near the tube of 700 centimeters per second. Tests have shown that virtually no turbulance was present in the gas streams and the deposition thicknesses were within ±5% from each other across all useful portions of the wafers.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3672948 *Jan 2, 1970Jun 27, 1972IbmMethod for diffusion limited mass transport
US4062318 *Nov 19, 1976Dec 13, 1977Rca CorporationApparatus for chemical vapor deposition
US4082865 *Mar 21, 1977Apr 4, 1978Rca CorporationMethod for chemical vapor deposition
US4401689 *Oct 28, 1980Aug 30, 1983Rca CorporationInductively heating with radio frequency energy
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *R. V. D Aiello et al., The Growth and Characterization of Epitaxial Solar Cells on Resolidified Metallurgical Grade Silicon, RCA Review, vol. 44, 3, (1983), pp. 30 32 and 40 47.
2R. V. D'Aiello et al., "The Growth and Characterization of Epitaxial Solar Cells on Resolidified Metallurgical-Grade Silicon," RCA Review, vol. 44, 3, (1983), pp. 30-32 and 40-47.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4597986 *Aug 12, 1985Jul 1, 1986Hughes Aircraft CompanyMethod for photochemical vapor deposition
US4615294 *Jul 31, 1984Oct 7, 1986Hughes Aircraft CompanyBarrel reactor and method for photochemical vapor deposition
US4745088 *Feb 19, 1986May 17, 1988Hitachi, Ltd.Vapor phase growth on semiconductor wafers
US4926793 *Nov 30, 1987May 22, 1990Shin-Etsu Handotai Co., Ltd.Method of forming thin film and apparatus therefor
US4927359 *Apr 3, 1989May 22, 1990General Electric CompanyFluid distribution apparatus
US5106453 *Jan 29, 1990Apr 21, 1992At&T Bell LaboratoriesMOCVD method and apparatus
US5169685 *Nov 1, 1990Dec 8, 1992General Electric CompanyMethod for forming non-columnar deposits by chemical vapor deposition
US5186756 *Dec 9, 1991Feb 16, 1993At&T Bell LaboratoriesMOCVD method and apparatus
US5221556 *Jun 24, 1987Jun 22, 1993Epsilon Technology, Inc.Gas injectors for reaction chambers in CVD systems
US5391232 *Jun 8, 1993Feb 21, 1995Canon Kabushiki KaishaPlurality of coaxially aligned conduits for transporting gaseous starting materials
US5443645 *Dec 28, 1993Aug 22, 1995Canon Kabushiki KaishaMicrowave plasma CVD apparatus comprising coaxially aligned multiple gas pipe gas feed structure
US5458918 *Dec 21, 1993Oct 17, 1995Advanced Semiconductor Materials America, Inc.Gas injectors for reaction chambers in CVD systems
US5525157 *Aug 11, 1995Jun 11, 1996Advanced Semiconductor Materials America, Inc.Gas injectors for reaction chambers in CVD systems
US5683516 *Mar 22, 1996Nov 4, 1997Watkins-Johnson Co.Single body injector and method for delivering gases to a surface
US5819684 *Jun 10, 1996Oct 13, 1998Hawkins; Mark R.Chemical vapor deposition apparatus
US5851294 *Sep 12, 1997Dec 22, 1998Watkins-Johnson CompanyGas injection system for semiconductor processing
US5935647 *Jun 4, 1997Aug 10, 1999Wj Semiconductor Equipment Group, Inc.Method of manufacturing an injector for chemical vapor deposition processing
US6022414 *Jul 14, 1997Feb 8, 2000Semiconductor Equipment Group, LlcSingle body injector and method for delivering gases to a surface
US6200389Jul 10, 1998Mar 13, 2001Silicon Valley Group Thermal Systems LlcSingle body injector and deposition chamber
US6413884Jun 5, 1998Jul 2, 2002Nec CorporationSubstrate to rotates around a center axis in accompany with a first gas spouting toward the substrate and colliding with a second gas
US6521048Jan 9, 2001Feb 18, 2003Asml Us, Inc.For delivering gases to a substrate or wafer for processing of said substrate or wafer; vapor deposition
US7900580 *Oct 31, 2007Mar 8, 2011Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate processing apparatus and reaction container
US8047158 *Oct 31, 2007Nov 1, 2011Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate processing apparatus and reaction container
US8176871 *Mar 28, 2007May 15, 2012Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate processing apparatus
US8251012 *Feb 28, 2006Aug 28, 2012Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate processing apparatus and semiconductor device producing method
US20080286980 *Feb 28, 2006Nov 20, 2008Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate Processing Apparatus and Semiconductor Device Producing Method
US20090151632 *Mar 28, 2007Jun 18, 2009Hitachi Kokusai Electric Inc.Substrate Processing Apparatus
US20110183074 *Mar 13, 2009Jul 28, 2011Schaefer Suzanne EOzone applicator and method for polymer oxidation
EP0258052A2 *Aug 27, 1987Mar 2, 1988Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyChemical vapor deposition reactor and method of chemical vapor deposition
EP0283007A2 *Mar 17, 1988Sep 21, 1988Fujitsu LimitedChemical vapour deposition apparatus having a perforated head
EP0605725A1 *Sep 28, 1992Jul 13, 1994Komatsu Electronic Metals Co., LtdApparatus for introducing gas, and apparatus and method for epitaxial growth
EP0884407A1 *Jun 4, 1998Dec 16, 1998Nec CorporationMethod and apparatus for producing thin films using colliding currents of process gas and inert gas
EP0890654A1 *Jun 12, 1998Jan 13, 1999DUMA MASCHINEN- UND ANLAGENBAU BETEILIGUNGS GmbHApparatus for uniforming the gas pressure distribution at the output port of a flat-jet nozzle
WO1989012703A1 *Jun 22, 1988Dec 28, 1989Asm Epitaxy IncGas injector apparatus for chemical vapor deposition reactors
WO1997015698A1 *Oct 18, 1996May 1, 1997Watkins Johnson CoGas injection system for semiconductor processing
Classifications
U.S. Classification118/725, 427/255.5, 118/730, 118/715
International ClassificationC23C16/455, C23C16/44, C30B25/14
Cooperative ClassificationC23C16/45578, C23C16/45504, C30B25/14, C23C16/455
European ClassificationC30B25/14, C23C16/455K14, C23C16/455, C23C16/455A2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Nov 8, 1999ASAssignment
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, N
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERSIL CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:010351/0410
Effective date: 19990813
Owner name: CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON, AS COLLATERAL AGENT 11
Sep 28, 1999ASAssignment
Owner name: INTERSIL CORPORATION, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HARRIS SEMICONDUCTOR PATENTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010247/0161
Effective date: 19990813
Aug 16, 1996FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Sep 22, 1992REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Jun 26, 1992FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Mar 31, 1988FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Dec 9, 1983ASAssignment
Owner name: RCA CORPORATION A DE CORP
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:MILLER, EDWARD A.;REEL/FRAME:004208/0133
Effective date: 19831207