Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS4506010 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 06/330,640
Publication dateMar 19, 1985
Filing dateDec 14, 1981
Priority dateFeb 23, 1981
Fee statusLapsed
Publication number06330640, 330640, US 4506010 A, US 4506010A, US-A-4506010, US4506010 A, US4506010A
InventorsNelson Goodman, Brian C. Cunningham
Original AssigneeStauffer Chemical Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method for testing microbial degradation of cellulose
US 4506010 A
Abstract
Changes in the optical density and viscosity measurements of a water-soluble cellulose derivative which is enzyme depolymerizable can be used as a method to determine growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms and cellulose degradation. The method is particularly well suited to the measurement of the effect of pesticides on cellulose degradation.
Images(6)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(2)
We claim:
1. A method for measuring pesticidal effect on growth and function of cellulase-producing microorganisms which comprises
(a) forming a mixture of water and a water-soluble colloidal cellulose derivative which is enzyme depolymerxable as a growth medium;
(b) providing suitable nutrients to the medium to familitate microorganism growth;
(c) inoculating the medium with a cellulase-producing microorganism;
(d) treating separate portions of the medium with the pesticide to be tested while retaining at least one separate portion as a comparison test control;
(e) measuring changes in optical density; and
(f) measuring changes in the viscosity of the medium over a period of time whereby the inhibitory effects of the pesticide can be measured by observed changes in optical density and viscosity of the cellulose sulfate/water mixture portions when compared to the test control.
2. A method according to claim 1 in which the cellulose derivative is a homogeneously substituted sulfate ester having a degree of substitution of less than one.
Description

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 237,004, filed Feb. 23, 1981, now abandoned.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The Environmental Protection Agency requires data on pesticidal effects upon microbial growth and function to support registration of a pesticide for commercial application. The growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms which degrade cellulose is particularly important for the eco-system. Therefore, a need exists for an accurate and economical method for testing a pesticide's potential inhibition of cellulase activity and cellulose degradation.

PRIOR ART

Several techniques have been developed for measuring cellulose degradation. One method involved the use of dye indicators. Cellulolytic fungi uncoupled blue dye from dye-bound cellulose powder during incubation, and the free dye diffused into the basal layer of medium. The amount of dye released, and the speed of release, appeared related to the degree of cellulolytic ability of individual cultures. See R. E. Smith, "Rapid Tube Test for Detecting Fungal Cellulase Production," 33 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 980 (1977).

Another method involved measurement of the depth of clearing of opaque columns of an agar medium containing a partially crystalline cellulose preparation inoculated with fungi. As the organisms grew, they secreted cellulolytic enzymes which hydrolyzed the cellulose substrate. This created a sharply defined clear zone in the opaque medium beneath the growing culture. See G. S. Rautela and E. G. Cowling, "Simple Cultural Test for Relative Cellulolytic Activity of Fungi," 14 Applied Microbiology 892 (1966). The method is better suited to measurement of relative activities of various fungi than to changes in the activity of a particular species under varying conditions.

Filter papers and disks have also been used to assay cellulase activity. See "Antibiotic Disks--An Improvement in the Filter Paper Assay for Cullulose," 20 Biotechnology and Bioengineering 297 (1978).

Common methods of measuring the cellulase inhibitory effects of herbicides have utilized the disintegration of cotton thread and calico in soil. See E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, "The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition," Herbicides and Soil Microflora, 236-253. The limitation of these methods inheres in the insolubility of the cellulose which restricts quantitative measurement of its disintegration.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention provides a quantitative method for measuring growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms and degradation of cellulose. The method utilizes a water soluble cellulose derivative to measure microbial cellulose degradation as a reduction in viscosity. The method is particularly suited to testing the effect of pesticides on microbial growth and function.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a method for measuring the growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms and degradation of cellulose. It is superior to previous methods because it provides for precise quantitative measurement.

The cellulose component used in the method of this invention must be a water-soluble colloidal cellulose derivative. It is used as a growth medium when supplied with nutrients and inoculated with a cellulase-producing microorganism. Growth of the microorganism or cellulase production is determined by measuring increases in the optical density of the medium. Microbial cellulose degradation is measured by reductions in viscosity.

Although any water-soluble colloidal cellulose derivative, which is enzyme depolymerizable, may be used as a growth medium, the method was tested using cellulose sulfate ester derivatives. These cellulose derivatives and their preparation are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,702,843 and 4,141,746, and an article by Richard G. Schweiger, "New Cellulose Sulfate Derivatives and Applications," 70 Carbohydrate Research 185-198 (1979).

The sulfate ester groups of this cellulose derivative are homogeneously distributed among the polymer units. Preferably, the degree of substitution is less than one. When the degree of substitution is greater than one, the sulfates are relatively resistant to enzyme degradation.

Since the viscous properties of the cellulose are critical to the method of this invention, it may be noted that the colloidal cellulose sulfate esters used herein were viscous at 1.0% of an aqueous solution. Reductions in viscosity during cellulose degradation can be quantitatively measured with a viscoso-meter.

The colloidal cellulose sulfate ester derivative, described herein, can be prepared as a nutrient growth medium for the cellulase producing microorganisms as follows. An aqueous solution is prepared containing from approximately 0.1 to 10.0%, preferably 0.5 to 2.0% cellulose sulfate ester. To this solution a nutrient is added such as, from 0.01% to 20.0% yeast extract. Preferably, the yeast extract comprises between 0.1-2.0% of the solution. The solution may also contain up to 10.0%, but ideally up to 2%, 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol.

The medium is then inoculated with a cellulase-producing microorganism. Examples of such organisms include Trichodema viride and Cellulomonas biazotea. The latter microorganism was used to demonstrate the method of this invention.

The method of this invention for measuring the growth of the microorganism and cellulose degradation was tested according to the procedure described in Example 1. It was then tested to measure the effect of herbicides on cellulase growth and cellulose degradation as described in Examples 2 and 3.

EXAMPLE 1

An aqueous medium was prepared containing 1.21% Tris(2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol), 0.5% yeast extract, and 1.2% colloidal cellulose sulfate ester having medium negative charge and viscosity of approximately 70-1600 cps. One-hundred milliliter (ml) portions of the medium were placed in 500 ml dented-bottomed flasks having gauze closures. The pH was adjusted to 7.5 by adding 38% hydrochloric acid.

After sterilization by autoclaving for 20 minutes, each test flask of medium was inoculated with a 1 ml cell suspension of Cellulomonas biazotea. The cultures and 6 uninoculated control flasks were incubated at 30° C. and 150 rpm.

Table I shows the viscosity and optical density measurements at 24, 48, and 72 hour intervals. Assays of the uninoculated control flasks did not indicate a significant drop in viscosity. Assays of the inoculated flasks demonstrated degradation of cellulose by Cellulomonas biazotea as evidenced by the concommitant decrease in viscosity. Forty-eight hours after inoculation, viscosity dropped from an average of 155 centipoise to 10 centipoise. After 54 hours it had dropped to 5 centipoise.

Density increased from 40 Klett units 24 hours after inoculation to 264 at 72 hours, indicating growth of the microorganism.

              TABLE I______________________________________Colloidal Cellulose Sulfate EsterViscosity and Optical Density        Hours        0    24     30     48   54   72______________________________________Viscosity (centipoise)Uninoculated cellulose          155    --     149  --   140.5                                       143Cellulose inoculated with          --     104    59    10   7    4Cellulomonas biazoteaDensity (Klett units)Cellulose inoculated with           16     42    68   210  268Cellulomonas biazotea______________________________________
EXAMPLE 2

The method of this invention was used to test the effect of the herbicide S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate on the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea and subsequent cellulose degradation of the colloidal cellulose sulfate ester.

The herbicide can be prepared by the methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,327. Inoculated batchs of the cellulose sulfate ester in 2% ethanol solvent were treated with 6, 12, and 60 parts per million (ppm) of the herbicide. The concentrations were considered equivalent to the maximum recommended 6, 12, and 60 pounds per acre (lb/A) application rates for the herbicide.

Control groups contained (1) Cellulomonas biazotea inoculated cellulose alone, and (2) inoculated cellulose and 2% ethanol solvent. Test and control flasks were incubated under the same conditions as in Example 1. Viscosity measurements are shown in Table II. Optical density measurements are shown in Table III. At 66 hours after incubation the control cultures containing 2% ethanol and no herbicide showed a 70% loss in viscosity and a 30 Klett unit increase in optical density, indicating normal growth and function of the cellulase-producing microorganism.

The viscosity and optical density of the test flakes containing herbicide at 6 ppm did not significantly deviate from the control group.

Cultures with 12 and 60 ppm herbicide showed a decrease in optical density and less viscosity reduction. After 66 hours, cultures with 12 ppm herbicide had a viscosity reduction of only 85% of the control level and an optical density increase of only 47% of the control level. In cultures with 60 ppm herbicide the viscosity loss was further reduced to only 32% and the increase in optical density was only 12% of the control value. The results indicate that at elevated concentration levels the herbicide was inhibiting microorganism growth and cellulase production.

                                  TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Herbicide on Cellulose Degradation/Viscosity              Viscosity (Centipoise)/HoursMedium             0  26.5                    42.5                       66 97.5                             118                                139__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated:      247                 -- -- -- -- -- 184Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea:No additives          175                     62                        8 -- -- --2% ethanol added      195                    183                       70 -- -- --2% ethanol and 6ppm S--ethyl                 203                    177                       69 18 11 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 12 ppm S--ethyl                 205                    180                       97 30 15 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 60 ppm S--ethyl                 203                    196                       178                          108                             --  24diisobutylthiocarbamate added__________________________________________________________________________

                                  TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Herbicide on Cellulomonas biazotea Growth              Optical Density/HoursMedium             0 26.5                   42.5                      66 97.5                            118                               139__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated:      18                -- -- -- -- --  17Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea:No additives       --                22 83 204                         -- -- --2% ethanol added   --                19 20 50 -- -- --2% ethanol and 6 ppm S--ethyl              --                17 19 49 114                            142                               --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 12 ppm S--ethyl              --                19 23 33 75 118                               --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 60 ppm S--ethyl              --                20 18 22 26 -- 109diisobutylthiocarbamate added__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 3

The herbicide Naproamide, or 2-(α-naphthoxy)-N,N-diethylpropionamide, was also tested by the method of this invention to determine its effect on the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea and cellulose degradation. The herbicide which is commercially available as DevinolŪ can be prepared by the procedures described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,480,671.

The measurements of cellulose degradation through viscosity reduction appear in Table IV. The measurements of the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea through optical density increases appear in Table V.

                                  TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________EFFECT OF NAPROPAMIDE ON CELLULOSE DEGRADATION (VISCOSITY)REDUCTION BY CELLULOMONAS BIAZOTEA IN COLLOID X-H2 BROTH                   Viscosity (Centipoise)/Time After InoculationColloid X-H2 Broth Additions              Replicate                   Initial                       22.5 h                           29.5 h                               45 h                                  52 h                                     69 h__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated Sterile Medium              A    149 --  --  -- -- 139.00.1% ethanol       B    154 --  --  -- -- 140.4Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea              A    --   94 59  30 22 50.1% ethanol       B    --   94 61  29 18 70.1% ethanol +3 ppm Napropamide              A    --  109 59  29 -- 3              B    --   92 64  29 -- --0.1% ethanol +6 ppm Napropamide              A    --   93 64  29 19 2              B    --  105 69  34 18 20.1% ethanol +30 ppm Napropamide              A    --  120 63  35 19 8              B    --  124 88  35 31 --__________________________________________________________________________

                                  TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________EFFECT OF NAPROPAMDE ON THE GROWTH (OPTICAL DENSITY) OFCELLULOMONAS BIAZOTEA IN COLLOID X-H2 BROTH                   Klett Optical Density/Time After InoculationColloid X-H2 Broth Additions              Replicate                   Initial                       22.5 h                           29.5 h                               45 h                                  52 h                                     69 h__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated Sterile Medium              A    20  --  --  -- --  200.1% ethanol       B    20  --  --  -- --  20Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea              A    --  65  120 220                                  230                                     2500.1% ethanol       B    --  65  110 230                                  236                                     2500.1% ethanol +3 ppm Napropamide              A    --  60  108 216                                  -- 236              B    --  63  101 218                                  -- --0.1% ethanol +6 ppm Napropamide              A    --  65  100 198                                  228                                     236              B    --  58  101 208                                  228                                     2480.1% ethanol +30 ppm Napropamide              A    --  40   91 157                                  195                                     200              B    --  48   66 150                                  195                                     --__________________________________________________________________________
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3509026 *Jan 19, 1967Apr 28, 1970Litton Systems IncMethod of and apparatus for indicating the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics
US3957583 *Dec 2, 1974May 18, 1976Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationApparatus and process for determining the susceptibility of microorganisms to antibiotics
US4036697 *Feb 13, 1976Jul 19, 1977Beckman Instruments, Inc.Kinetic assay for alpha-amylase
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, "The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition", Herbicides and Soil Microflora; pp. 236-253.
2 *E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition , Herbicides and Soil Microflora; pp. 236 253.
3 *Thomas E. Barman, Enzyme Handbook, vol. II, pp. 560, 561, 565 and 566; 1969.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6277642 *Feb 28, 1997Aug 21, 2001Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.Testing system for chemical substances or substance mixtures
US7160714 *Dec 28, 2001Jan 9, 2007Menicon Co., Ltd.Vegetable fiber-digesting agent and method of processing vegetable waste by using the same
US7832857Aug 18, 2008Nov 16, 2010Levinson Dennis JMicrobial cellulose contact lens
US20130177534 *Aug 23, 2011Jul 11, 2013Peter FischerPlant protection agent comprising insect-pathogenic viruses, in particular baculoviruses, and cellulose sulfate
US20130189229 *Aug 23, 2011Jul 25, 2013Eric GeppertMethod for protecting plants using insect-pathogenic viruses and cellulose sulfate
EP0493758A1 *Dec 20, 1991Jul 8, 1992Hoechst Japan LimitedAn instrument and a method for measuring the activity of an enzyme or the activity of an enzymatic reaction-inhibiting substance
Classifications
U.S. Classification435/32, 435/34, 435/99, 435/39
International ClassificationC12Q1/34, C12Q1/02
Cooperative ClassificationC12Q1/025, G01N2400/26, C12Q1/34, G01N2333/924
European ClassificationC12Q1/02B, C12Q1/34
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 3, 1986CCCertificate of correction
Jul 15, 1986CCCertificate of correction
Apr 8, 1988FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Aug 18, 1989ASAssignment
Owner name: ICI AMERICAS INC., A DE CORP., DELAWARE
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:005197/0025
Effective date: 19890815
Oct 21, 1992REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailed
Feb 14, 1993LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance fees