|Publication number||US4506010 A|
|Application number||US 06/330,640|
|Publication date||Mar 19, 1985|
|Filing date||Dec 14, 1981|
|Priority date||Feb 23, 1981|
|Publication number||06330640, 330640, US 4506010 A, US 4506010A, US-A-4506010, US4506010 A, US4506010A|
|Inventors||Nelson Goodman, Brian C. Cunningham|
|Original Assignee||Stauffer Chemical Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (3), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (6), Classifications (12), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 237,004, filed Feb. 23, 1981, now abandoned.
The Environmental Protection Agency requires data on pesticidal effects upon microbial growth and function to support registration of a pesticide for commercial application. The growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms which degrade cellulose is particularly important for the eco-system. Therefore, a need exists for an accurate and economical method for testing a pesticide's potential inhibition of cellulase activity and cellulose degradation.
Several techniques have been developed for measuring cellulose degradation. One method involved the use of dye indicators. Cellulolytic fungi uncoupled blue dye from dye-bound cellulose powder during incubation, and the free dye diffused into the basal layer of medium. The amount of dye released, and the speed of release, appeared related to the degree of cellulolytic ability of individual cultures. See R. E. Smith, "Rapid Tube Test for Detecting Fungal Cellulase Production," 33 Applied and Environmental Microbiology 980 (1977).
Another method involved measurement of the depth of clearing of opaque columns of an agar medium containing a partially crystalline cellulose preparation inoculated with fungi. As the organisms grew, they secreted cellulolytic enzymes which hydrolyzed the cellulose substrate. This created a sharply defined clear zone in the opaque medium beneath the growing culture. See G. S. Rautela and E. G. Cowling, "Simple Cultural Test for Relative Cellulolytic Activity of Fungi," 14 Applied Microbiology 892 (1966). The method is better suited to measurement of relative activities of various fungi than to changes in the activity of a particular species under varying conditions.
Filter papers and disks have also been used to assay cellulase activity. See "Antibiotic Disks--An Improvement in the Filter Paper Assay for Cullulose," 20 Biotechnology and Bioengineering 297 (1978).
Common methods of measuring the cellulase inhibitory effects of herbicides have utilized the disintegration of cotton thread and calico in soil. See E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, "The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition," Herbicides and Soil Microflora, 236-253. The limitation of these methods inheres in the insolubility of the cellulose which restricts quantitative measurement of its disintegration.
This invention provides a quantitative method for measuring growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms and degradation of cellulose. The method utilizes a water soluble cellulose derivative to measure microbial cellulose degradation as a reduction in viscosity. The method is particularly suited to testing the effect of pesticides on microbial growth and function.
This invention relates to a method for measuring the growth of cellulase-producing microorganisms and degradation of cellulose. It is superior to previous methods because it provides for precise quantitative measurement.
The cellulose component used in the method of this invention must be a water-soluble colloidal cellulose derivative. It is used as a growth medium when supplied with nutrients and inoculated with a cellulase-producing microorganism. Growth of the microorganism or cellulase production is determined by measuring increases in the optical density of the medium. Microbial cellulose degradation is measured by reductions in viscosity.
Although any water-soluble colloidal cellulose derivative, which is enzyme depolymerizable, may be used as a growth medium, the method was tested using cellulose sulfate ester derivatives. These cellulose derivatives and their preparation are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,702,843 and 4,141,746, and an article by Richard G. Schweiger, "New Cellulose Sulfate Derivatives and Applications," 70 Carbohydrate Research 185-198 (1979).
The sulfate ester groups of this cellulose derivative are homogeneously distributed among the polymer units. Preferably, the degree of substitution is less than one. When the degree of substitution is greater than one, the sulfates are relatively resistant to enzyme degradation.
Since the viscous properties of the cellulose are critical to the method of this invention, it may be noted that the colloidal cellulose sulfate esters used herein were viscous at 1.0% of an aqueous solution. Reductions in viscosity during cellulose degradation can be quantitatively measured with a viscoso-meter.
The colloidal cellulose sulfate ester derivative, described herein, can be prepared as a nutrient growth medium for the cellulase producing microorganisms as follows. An aqueous solution is prepared containing from approximately 0.1 to 10.0%, preferably 0.5 to 2.0% cellulose sulfate ester. To this solution a nutrient is added such as, from 0.01% to 20.0% yeast extract. Preferably, the yeast extract comprises between 0.1-2.0% of the solution. The solution may also contain up to 10.0%, but ideally up to 2%, 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol.
The medium is then inoculated with a cellulase-producing microorganism. Examples of such organisms include Trichodema viride and Cellulomonas biazotea. The latter microorganism was used to demonstrate the method of this invention.
The method of this invention for measuring the growth of the microorganism and cellulose degradation was tested according to the procedure described in Example 1. It was then tested to measure the effect of herbicides on cellulase growth and cellulose degradation as described in Examples 2 and 3.
An aqueous medium was prepared containing 1.21% Tris(2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-1,3-propanediol), 0.5% yeast extract, and 1.2% colloidal cellulose sulfate ester having medium negative charge and viscosity of approximately 70-1600 cps. One-hundred milliliter (ml) portions of the medium were placed in 500 ml dented-bottomed flasks having gauze closures. The pH was adjusted to 7.5 by adding 38% hydrochloric acid.
After sterilization by autoclaving for 20 minutes, each test flask of medium was inoculated with a 1 ml cell suspension of Cellulomonas biazotea. The cultures and 6 uninoculated control flasks were incubated at 30° C. and 150 rpm.
Table I shows the viscosity and optical density measurements at 24, 48, and 72 hour intervals. Assays of the uninoculated control flasks did not indicate a significant drop in viscosity. Assays of the inoculated flasks demonstrated degradation of cellulose by Cellulomonas biazotea as evidenced by the concommitant decrease in viscosity. Forty-eight hours after inoculation, viscosity dropped from an average of 155 centipoise to 10 centipoise. After 54 hours it had dropped to 5 centipoise.
Density increased from 40 Klett units 24 hours after inoculation to 264 at 72 hours, indicating growth of the microorganism.
TABLE I______________________________________Colloidal Cellulose Sulfate EsterViscosity and Optical Density Hours 0 24 30 48 54 72______________________________________Viscosity (centipoise)Uninoculated cellulose 155 -- 149 -- 140.5 143Cellulose inoculated with -- 104 59 10 7 4Cellulomonas biazoteaDensity (Klett units)Cellulose inoculated with 16 42 68 210 268Cellulomonas biazotea______________________________________
The method of this invention was used to test the effect of the herbicide S-ethyl diisobutylthiocarbamate on the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea and subsequent cellulose degradation of the colloidal cellulose sulfate ester.
The herbicide can be prepared by the methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,913,327. Inoculated batchs of the cellulose sulfate ester in 2% ethanol solvent were treated with 6, 12, and 60 parts per million (ppm) of the herbicide. The concentrations were considered equivalent to the maximum recommended 6, 12, and 60 pounds per acre (lb/A) application rates for the herbicide.
Control groups contained (1) Cellulomonas biazotea inoculated cellulose alone, and (2) inoculated cellulose and 2% ethanol solvent. Test and control flasks were incubated under the same conditions as in Example 1. Viscosity measurements are shown in Table II. Optical density measurements are shown in Table III. At 66 hours after incubation the control cultures containing 2% ethanol and no herbicide showed a 70% loss in viscosity and a 30 Klett unit increase in optical density, indicating normal growth and function of the cellulase-producing microorganism.
The viscosity and optical density of the test flakes containing herbicide at 6 ppm did not significantly deviate from the control group.
Cultures with 12 and 60 ppm herbicide showed a decrease in optical density and less viscosity reduction. After 66 hours, cultures with 12 ppm herbicide had a viscosity reduction of only 85% of the control level and an optical density increase of only 47% of the control level. In cultures with 60 ppm herbicide the viscosity loss was further reduced to only 32% and the increase in optical density was only 12% of the control value. The results indicate that at elevated concentration levels the herbicide was inhibiting microorganism growth and cellulase production.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Herbicide on Cellulose Degradation/Viscosity Viscosity (Centipoise)/HoursMedium 0 26.5 42.5 66 97.5 118 139__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated: 247 -- -- -- -- -- 184Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea:No additives 175 62 8 -- -- --2% ethanol added 195 183 70 -- -- --2% ethanol and 6ppm S--ethyl 203 177 69 18 11 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 12 ppm S--ethyl 205 180 97 30 15 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 60 ppm S--ethyl 203 196 178 108 -- 24diisobutylthiocarbamate added__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________Effect of Herbicide on Cellulomonas biazotea Growth Optical Density/HoursMedium 0 26.5 42.5 66 97.5 118 139__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated: 18 -- -- -- -- -- 17Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea:No additives -- 22 83 204 -- -- --2% ethanol added -- 19 20 50 -- -- --2% ethanol and 6 ppm S--ethyl -- 17 19 49 114 142 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 12 ppm S--ethyl -- 19 23 33 75 118 --diisobutylthiocarbamate added2% ethanol and 60 ppm S--ethyl -- 20 18 22 26 -- 109diisobutylthiocarbamate added__________________________________________________________________________
The herbicide Naproamide, or 2-(α-naphthoxy)-N,N-diethylpropionamide, was also tested by the method of this invention to determine its effect on the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea and cellulose degradation. The herbicide which is commercially available as DevinolŪ can be prepared by the procedures described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,480,671.
The measurements of cellulose degradation through viscosity reduction appear in Table IV. The measurements of the growth of Cellulomonas biazotea through optical density increases appear in Table V.
TABLE IV__________________________________________________________________________EFFECT OF NAPROPAMIDE ON CELLULOSE DEGRADATION (VISCOSITY)REDUCTION BY CELLULOMONAS BIAZOTEA IN COLLOID X-H2 BROTH Viscosity (Centipoise)/Time After InoculationColloid X-H2 Broth Additions Replicate Initial 22.5 h 29.5 h 45 h 52 h 69 h__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated Sterile Medium A 149 -- -- -- -- 139.00.1% ethanol B 154 -- -- -- -- 140.4Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea A -- 94 59 30 22 50.1% ethanol B -- 94 61 29 18 70.1% ethanol +3 ppm Napropamide A -- 109 59 29 -- 3 B -- 92 64 29 -- --0.1% ethanol +6 ppm Napropamide A -- 93 64 29 19 2 B -- 105 69 34 18 20.1% ethanol +30 ppm Napropamide A -- 120 63 35 19 8 B -- 124 88 35 31 --__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________EFFECT OF NAPROPAMDE ON THE GROWTH (OPTICAL DENSITY) OFCELLULOMONAS BIAZOTEA IN COLLOID X-H2 BROTH Klett Optical Density/Time After InoculationColloid X-H2 Broth Additions Replicate Initial 22.5 h 29.5 h 45 h 52 h 69 h__________________________________________________________________________Uninoculated Sterile Medium A 20 -- -- -- -- 200.1% ethanol B 20 -- -- -- -- 20Inoculated with Cellulomonas biazotea A -- 65 120 220 230 2500.1% ethanol B -- 65 110 230 236 2500.1% ethanol +3 ppm Napropamide A -- 60 108 216 -- 236 B -- 63 101 218 -- --0.1% ethanol +6 ppm Napropamide A -- 65 100 198 228 236 B -- 58 101 208 228 2480.1% ethanol +30 ppm Napropamide A -- 40 91 157 195 200 B -- 48 66 150 195 --__________________________________________________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3509026 *||Jan 19, 1967||Apr 28, 1970||Litton Systems Inc||Method of and apparatus for indicating the sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics|
|US3957583 *||Dec 2, 1974||May 18, 1976||Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation||Apparatus and process for determining the susceptibility of microorganisms to antibiotics|
|US4036697 *||Feb 13, 1976||Jul 19, 1977||Beckman Instruments, Inc.||Kinetic assay for alpha-amylase|
|1||E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, "The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition", Herbicides and Soil Microflora; pp. 236-253.|
|2||*||E. Grossbard and G. I. Wingfield, The Effect of Herbicides on Cellulose Decomposition , Herbicides and Soil Microflora; pp. 236 253.|
|3||*||Thomas E. Barman, Enzyme Handbook, vol. II, pp. 560, 561, 565 and 566; 1969.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US6277642 *||Feb 28, 1997||Aug 21, 2001||Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.||Testing system for chemical substances or substance mixtures|
|US7160714 *||Dec 28, 2001||Jan 9, 2007||Menicon Co., Ltd.||Vegetable fiber-digesting agent and method of processing vegetable waste by using the same|
|US7832857||Aug 18, 2008||Nov 16, 2010||Levinson Dennis J||Microbial cellulose contact lens|
|US20130177534 *||Aug 23, 2011||Jul 11, 2013||Peter Fischer||Plant protection agent comprising insect-pathogenic viruses, in particular baculoviruses, and cellulose sulfate|
|US20130189229 *||Aug 23, 2011||Jul 25, 2013||Eric Geppert||Method for protecting plants using insect-pathogenic viruses and cellulose sulfate|
|EP0493758A1 *||Dec 20, 1991||Jul 8, 1992||Hoechst Japan Limited||An instrument and a method for measuring the activity of an enzyme or the activity of an enzymatic reaction-inhibiting substance|
|U.S. Classification||435/32, 435/34, 435/99, 435/39|
|International Classification||C12Q1/34, C12Q1/02|
|Cooperative Classification||C12Q1/025, G01N2400/26, C12Q1/34, G01N2333/924|
|European Classification||C12Q1/02B, C12Q1/34|
|Jun 3, 1986||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jul 15, 1986||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Apr 8, 1988||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Aug 18, 1989||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ICI AMERICAS INC., A DE CORP., DELAWARE
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:STAUFFER CHEMICAL COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:005197/0025
Effective date: 19890815
|Oct 21, 1992||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Feb 14, 1993||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|