|Publication number||US4563417 A|
|Application number||US 06/685,903|
|Publication date||Jan 7, 1986|
|Filing date||Dec 24, 1984|
|Priority date||Aug 31, 1984|
|Publication number||06685903, 685903, US 4563417 A, US 4563417A, US-A-4563417, US4563417 A, US4563417A|
|Inventors||James P. Albarella, Leslie H. D. Anderson|
|Original Assignee||Miles Laboratories, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Non-Patent Citations (3), Referenced by (217), Classifications (21), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 645,850, filed Aug. 31, 1984, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 560,429, filed Dec. 12, 1983, both abandoned.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to nucleic acid hybridization assay methods and reagent systems for detecting specific polynucleotide sequences. The principle of nucleic acid hybridization assays was developed by workers in the recombinant DNA field as a means for determining and isolating particular polynucleotide base sequences of interest. It was found that single stranded nucleic acids, e.g., DNA and RNA, such as obtained by denaturing their double stranded forms, will hybridize or recombine under appropriate conditions with complementary single stranded nucleic acids. By labeling such complementary probe nucleic acids with some readily detectable chemical group, it was then made possible to detect the presence of any polynucleotide sequence of interest in a test medium containing sample nucleic acids in single stranded form.
In addition to the recombinant DNA field, the analytical hybridization technique can be applied to the detection of polynucleotides of importance in the fields of human and veterinary medicine, agriculture, and food science, among others. In particular, the technique can be used to detect and identify etiological agents such as bacteria and viruses, to screen bacteria for antibiotic resistance, to aid in the diagnosis of genetic disorders such as sickle cell anemia and thalassemia, and to detect cancerous cells. A general review of the technique and its present and future significance is provided in Biotechnology (August 1983), pp. 471-478.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The state-of-the-art nucleic acid hybridization assay technqiues involve chemical modification of either the probe nucleic acid or sample nucleic acids for the purpose of labeling and detection. The necessity of chemically modifying nucleic acids severely limits the practical use of the technique since it requires the large-scale preparation of labeled probes involving complicated and expensive synthetic and purification procedures or the in situ synthesis of labeled sample nucleic acids by the analytical user. In particular, the resulting labeled polynucleotide must retain the ability to hybridize efficiently with its complementary sample or probe sequence. Such a requirement severely limits the availability of useful synthetic approaches to label modification of polynucleotides intended for use in hybridization assays.
The early hybridization techniques involved the use of radioactive labels such as 3 H, 32 P, and 125 I. Labeled probes are synthesized enzymatically from radiolabeled nucleotides and a polynucleotide by such techniques as nick translation, end labeling, second strand synthesis, reverse transcription, and transcription. Thus, an additional requirement of such enzymatic methods is that the modified or labeled nucleotides must serve as effective substrates for the polymerase enzymes involved in the assembly of the labeled polynucleotide. Direct chemical modification of the polynucleotide is also possible, however, such a method is quite inefficient in incorporating labels into the polynucleotide and can affect the ability of the polynucleotide to undergo hybridization.
Because of the handling and storage disadvantages of radiolabeled materials, there has been considerable continuing efforts to develop useful nonradioisotopic labeling approaches. Such labels have included light emitting molecules such as fluorescers and chemiluminescers, and ligand molecules which are capable of being specifically bound by counterpart binders which are in turn labeled with detectable chemical groups such as fluorescers and enzymes. Examples of ligand labels are haptens, which are specifically bound by antibodies, and other small molecules for which specific binding proteins exist, e.g., biotin which is bound by avidin.
British Pat. No. 2,019,408 describes polynucleotide probes which are labeled with biotin through cytochrome C linking groups and which are then detectable by enzyme-labeled avidin. An alternative approach to labeling probes with low molecular weight ligands such as biotin is described in European Pat. Appln. No. 63,879. In this technique, 5-allylamine-deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP) derivatives are condensed with the desired ligand label and the thus modified nucleotide is incorporated by standard enzymatic methods into the desired probe. The use of light emitting labels is suggested by European Pat. Appln. Nos. 70,685 and 70,687. Other representatives of the patent literature pertaining to hybridization assays are U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,302,204 concerning the use of certain water soluble polysaccharides to accelerate hybridization on a solid-phase; 4,358,535 concerning the detection of pathogens in clinical samples; and 4,395,486 concerning the detection of sickle cell anemia trait using a synthetic oligonucleotide probe.
Techniques for detecting directly the polynucleotide duplex formed as the product of hybridization between the sample and probe polynucleotides, and thereby dispensing with the chemical labeling of one or the other polynucleotide, have been generally unsuccessful. Attempts to generate antibodies which will selectively bind double stranded DNA/DNA hybrids over single stranded DNA have failed [Parker and Halloran, "Nucleic Acids in Immunology", ed. Plescia and Braun, Springer-Verlag, NY(1969) pp. 18 et seq]. Some success has been achieved in generating antibodies that will bind RNA/DNA mixed hybrids and have low affinity for the single stranded polynucleotides [Rudkin and Stollar, Nature 265:472(1977); Stuart et al, PNAS(USA)78:3751(1981); Reddy and Sofer, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 103:959(1981); and Nakazato, Biochem. 19:2835(1980)], however, the sensitivity of these methods has not reached the levels required for clinical hybridization tests and one would have to use RNA probes which are well known to be quite unstable.
Accordingly, there is an established need for a technique for detecting hybridization without requiring chemical modification of polynucleotides or involving a labeling method of relative simplicity. Further, such technique should enable the use of a variety of labels, particularly of the nonradioisotopic type. A nucleic acid hybridization assay method and reagent system having these and other advantages are principal objectives of the present invention.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,257,774 describes a method for detecting various compounds that interact with nucleic acids, particularly compounds suspected as possible mutagens or carcinogens, by measuring the ability of such compounds to inhibit the binding of intercalators such as acridine orange to nucleic acids. Poirier, M.C. et al (1982) PNAS 79:6443-6447 describe the preparation of a monoclonal antibody selective for certain cis-platinum/double stranded DNA complexes over the free cis-platinum compound and double stranded DNA.
It has now been found that hybridization which occurs between sample nucleic acid and the probe in nucleic acid hybridization assays can be detected advantageously by means of an antibody, or an appropriate binding fragment thereof, capable of binding with intercalation complexes formed in association with hybridized probe. In essence, a particular polynucleotide sequence is detected in a test medium containing single stranded nucleic acids by forming a hybridization aggregate or product comprising hybridized probe and a nucleic acid intercalator compound bound to double stranded nucleic acid in the form of intercalation complexes. The antibody or fragment thereof is then used to detect intercalation complexes in the hybridization aggregate.
The use of nucleic acid hybridization as an analytical tool is based fundamentally on the double stranded, duplex structure of DNA. The hydrogen bonds between the purine and pyrimidine bases of the respective strands in double stranded DNA can be reversibly broken. The two complementary single strands of DNA resulting from this melting or denaturation of DNA will associate (also referred to as reannealing or hybridization) to reform the duplexed structure. As is now well known in the art, contact of a first single stranded nucleic acid, either DNA or RNA, which comprises a base sequence sufficiently complementary to (i.e., "homologous with") a second single stranded nucleic acid under appropriate solution conditions, will result in the formation of DNA/DNA, RNA/DNA, or RNA/RNA hybrids, as the case may be.
The present invention enables the detection of formed hybrids by inducing an immunogenic modification of double stranded nucleic acid in the region of hybridization or in flanking regions. The resulting product can then be detected by conventional assay schemes based on the binding of specific antibody to the epitopes or antigenic determinants formed on the hybridization product. The requisite immunogenic modification of double stranded nucleic acid is accomplished principally by binding of a molecule, usually a low molecular weight compound, to the duplex. Such binding results in the creation of an antigenic determinant which distinguishes double stranded nucleic acid from both single stranded nucleic acid and the free, unbound modifier molecule. Preferably, this is accomplished by employing a modifier compound which is essentially incapable of binding with single stranded nucleic acid and which forms a binding complex with double stranded nucleic acid which alters the normal helical relationship of the complementary strands of the duplex.
Such modifier molecule as described herein is a nucleic acid intercalator which preferentially will interact with the normal nucleic acid helix by a non-covalent insertion between base pairs. Such insertion causes, in this preferred interaction, the tertiary structure of the helix to change by unwinding and elongation along the helical axis. A schematic representation of this preferred intercalation interaction is shown in FIG. 1 of the drawings. The resulting intercalation complex is characterized by newly formed antigenic determinants which are understood to comprise the intercalated modifier compound and the reoriented phosphodiesterase backbones of the respective strands of the duplex.
Preferably, the intercalator compound is one of the generally planar, aromatic organic molecules known to form intercalation complexes with double stranded nucleic acid. Such compounds are exemplified by the acridine dyes, e.g., acridine orange, the phenanthridines, e.g., ethidium, the phenazines, furocoumarins, phenothiazines, quinolines, and the like as are more fully described below. It should be clearly understood that while the present invention will be hereinafter described with particular reference to such intercalator compounds, the present invention contemplates the use of equivalent modifier molecules which, as described above, will bind to double stranded nucleic acid to induce an immunogenic change in the duplex.
In accordance with the present invention, the intercalator can be combined with the test medium, and thereby become exposed to the double stranded nucleic acids present and/or forming in the hybridization reaction mixture, as a separate, free compound and bind noncovalently to such double stranded nucleic acids to form intercalation complexes. Alternatively, the intercalator can be appropriately linked by chemical bonds, preferably covalent bonds, to the probe. In the former case, the present invention provides a method for performing a hybridization assay without the need to chemically modify either the sample or probe polynucleotide in order to detect hybridization. In the latter case, a simple, synthetically straightforward means for labeling polynucleotides or the hybridization aggregate is provided by the use of photoreactable forms of the intercalator.
In all embodiments, the present invention provides a highly versatile, sensitive, and specific method for detecting hybridization based on antibody binding to the intercalation complexes in the aggregate formed. Of course, appropriate fragments and polyfunctional forms of the antibody can be used as described more fully below, and it will be understood that when used in this disclosure the term antibody will mean its fragmented and polyfunctional forms as well, unless otherwise noted. Determining the binding of antibody to intercalation complexes can be accomplished in a variety of conventional manners and preferably involves the use of antibody labeled with a detectable chemical group such as an enzymatically active group, a fluorescer, a luminescer, a specifically bindable ligand, or a radioisotope.
The invention is applicable to all conventional hybridization assay formats, and in general to any format that is possible based on formation of a hybridization product or aggregate comprising double stranded nucleic acid. In particular, the unique detection scheme of the present invention can be used in solution and solid-phase hybridization formats, including, in the latter case, formats involving immobilization of either sample or probe nucleic acids and sandwich formats.
The hybridization product or aggregate formed according to the present invention comprises hybridized probe and intercalator bound to double stranded nucleic acid in the form of intercalation complexes. The intercalation complexes can involve double stranded regions formed by hybridization between sample and probe nucleic acids. Alternatively, such double stranded regions can be comprised in the probe itself and in such case can additionally be intercalated prior to use of the probe in the assay. Thus, the detectable intercalation complexes can be formed in situ during the assay or can be existent in the probe reagent as present to the test medium. Further, the intercalation complexes can be chemically linked to one or both of the strands of the intercalated duplex. In general, any variation can be followed provided that the hybridization product ultimately comprise intercalation complexes detectable by the antibody binding phenomenon which is the underlying basis of the present invention.
Thus, the present invention provides an advantageous nucleic acid hybridization method and reagent system. Additionally, there is provided a novel antibody reagent capable of binding with intercalation complexes. Furthermore, besides the detection of particular polynucleotide sequences, the present invention provides a general method for detecting double stranded nucleic acid by adding intercalator and the anti-(intercalation complex) antibody and determining antibody binding.
The advantages of the present invention are significant and many. The invention is amenable to a wide variety of nonradioactive detection methods. Further, labeling of nucleic acids is straightforward and uses easily synthesized reagents. Labeling with the intercalator does not require expensive polymerases, and the labeling density of the intercalator can be easily controlled. Certain preferred embodiments have other advantages. In those embodiments in which the intercalator-nucleic acid complex is formed in situ, no prior synthesis of the complex is required and this approach can be used in a format in which a probe is immobilized on a solid support and immersed in a solution containing the specimen nucleic acid. In the embodiment where the intercalator is covalently coupled to the nucleic acid, the intercalator is attached to the probe during the manufacturing process, resulting in a controlled level of saturation. This approach also minimizes user exposure to an intercalating agent, many of which may be potentially hazardous.
FIG. 1, as described above, is a schematic representation of the preferred interaction between intercalator and double stranded nucleic acid which results in an intercalation complex that is detectable by antibody.
FIGS. 2-5 are schematic diagrams of four preferred hybridization formats for use in the present invention.
As described above, the intercalator compound preferably is a low molecular weight, planar, usually aromatic but sometimes polycyclic, molecule capable of binding with double stranded nucleic acids, e.g., DNA/DNA, DNA/RNA, or RNA/RNA duplexes, usually by insertion between base pairs. The primary binding mechanism will usually be noncovalent, with covalent binding occuring as a second step where the intercalator has reactive or activatable chemical groups which will form covalent bonds with neighboring chemical groups on one or both of the intercalated duplex strands. The result of intercalation is the spreading of adjacent base pairs to about twice their normal separation distance, leading to an increase in molecular length of the duplex. Further, unwinding of the double helix of about 12 to 36 degrees must occur in order to accomodate the intercalator. General reviews and further information can be obtained from Lerman, J. Mol. Biol. 3:18(1961); Bloomfield et al, "Physical Chemistry of Nucleic Acids", Chapter 7, pp. 429-476, Harper and Rowe, NY(1974); Waring, Nature 219:1320 (1968); Hartmann et al, Angew. Chem., Engl. Ed. 7:693(1968); Lippard, Accts. Chem. Res. 11:211(1978); Wilson, Intercalation Chemistry(1982), 445; and Berman et al, Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 10:87(1981).
A wide variety of intercalating agents can be used in the present invention. Some classes of these agents and examples of specific compounds are given in the following table:
______________________________________Intercalator Classesand Representative Compounds Literature References______________________________________A. Acridine dyes Lerman, supra; Bloom- field et al, supra; proflavin, acridine orange, Miller et al, Bio- quinacrine, acriflavine polymers 19:2091(1980)B. Phenanthridines Bloomfield et al, supra; Miller et al, supra ethidium coralyne Wilson et al, J. Med. Chem. 19:1261(1976) ellipticine, ellipticine Festy et al, FEBS cation and derivatives Letters 17:321(1971); Kohn et al, Cancer Res. 35:71(1976); LePecq et al, PNAS (USA)71: 5078(1974); Pelaprat et al, J. Med. Chem. 23:1330(1980)C. Phenazines Bloomfield et al, supra 5-methylphenazine cationD. Phenothiazines " chlopromazineE. Quinolines " chloroquine quinineF. Aflatoxin "G. Polycyclic hydrocarbons " and their oxirane derivatives 3,4-benzpyrene Yang et al, Biochem. benzopyrene diol Biophys. Res. Comm. oxirane 82:929(1978) benzanthracene-5,6-oxide Amea et al, Science 176:47(1972)H. Actinomycens Bloomfield et al, supra actinomycin DI. Anthracyclinones "rhodomycin A daunamycinJ. Thiaxanthenones " miracil DK. Anthramycin "L. Mitomycin Ogawa et al, Nucl. Acids Res., Spec. Publ. 3:79(1977); Akhtar et al, Can. J. Chem. 53:2891(1975)M. Platinium Complexes Lippard, supraN. Polyintercalators Waring et al, Nature echinomycin 252:653(1974); Wakelin, Biochem. J. 157:721(1976) quinomycin Lee et al, Biochem. J. triostin 173:115(1971); Huang BBM928A et al, Biochem. 19: tandem 5537(1980); Viswamitra et al, Nature 289: 817(1981) diacridines LePecq et al, PNAS (USA)72:2915(1975); Carrellakis et al, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 418:277(1976); Wakelin et al, Bio- chem 17:5057(1978); Wakelin et al, FEBS Lett. 104:261(1979); Capelle et al, Bio- chem. 18:3354(1979); Wright et al, Biochem. 19:5825(1980); Bernier et al Biochem. J. 199:479(1981); King et al, Biochem. 21: 4982(1982) ethidium dimer Gaugain et al, Bio- chem. 17:5078(1978); Kuhlman et al, Nucl. Acids Res. 5:2629 (1978); Marlcovits et al, Anal. Biochem. 94:259(1979); Dervan et al, JACS 100:1968 (1978); ibid 101: 3664(1979). ellipticene dimers Debarre et al, Compt. and analogs Rend. Ser. D 284: 81(1977); Pelaprat et al, J. Med. Chem. 23:1336(1980) heterodimers Cain et al, J. Med. Chem. 21:658(1978); Gaugain et al, Bio- chem. 17:5078(1978) trimers Hansen et al, JCS Chem. Comm. 162(1983); Atnell et al, JACS 105: 2913(1983)O. Norphillin A Loun et al, JACS 104: 3213(1982)P. Fluorenes and fluorenones Bloomfield et al, supra fluorenodiamines Witkowski et al, Wiss. Beitr.-Martin- Luther-Univ. Halle Wittenberg, 11(1981)Q. Furocoumarins Venema et al, MGG, angelicin Mol. Gen. Genet. 179;1 (1980) 4,5'-dimethylangelicin Vedaldi et al, Chem.- Biol. Interact. 36: 275(1981) psoralen Marciani et al, Z. Naturforsch B 27(2): 196(1972) 8-methoxypsoralen Belognzov et al, Mutat. Res. 84:11(1981); Scott et al, Photochem. Photobiol. 34:63(1981) 5-aminomethyl-8- Hansen et al, Tet. Lett methoxypsoralen 22:1847(1981) 4,5,8-trimethylpsoralen Ben-Hur et al, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 331:181(1973) 4'-aminomethyl-4,5,8- Issacs et al, Biochem. trimethylpsoralen 16:1058(1977) xanthotoxin Hradecma et al, Acta Virol. (Engl. Ed.) 26:305(1982) khellin Beaumont et al, Biochem. Biophys. Acta 608:1829(1980)R. Benzodipyrones Murx et al, J. Het. Chem. 12:417(1975); Horter et al, Photo- chem. Photobiol. 20: 407(1974)S. Monostral Past Blue Juarranz et al, Acta Histochem. 70:130 (1982)______________________________________
Several embodiments of the present invention involve the chemical, e.g., covalent, linkage of the intercalator to one or both of the complementary strands of a duplex. Essentially any convenient method can be used to accomplish such linkage. Conveniently, the linkage is formed by effecting intercalation with a reactive, preferably photoreactive intercalator, followed by the linking reaction. A particularly useful method involves the use of azidointercalators. The reactive nitrenes are readily generated at long wavelength ultraviolet or visible light and the nitrenes of arylazides prefer insertion reactions over their rearrangement products [see White et al, Methods in Enzymol. 46:644(1977)]. Representative azidointercalators are 3-azidoacridine, 9-azidoacridine, ethidium monoazide, ethidium diazide, ethidium dimer azide [Mitchell et al, JACS 104:4265(1982)], 4-azido-7-chloroquinoline, and 2-azidofluorene. Other useful photoreactable intercalators are the furocoumarins which form [2+2] cycloadducts with pyrimidine residues. Alkylating agents can also be used such as bis-chloroethylamines and epoxides or aziridines, e.g., aflatoxins, polycyclic hydrocarbon epoxides, mitomycin, and norphillin A.
Depending on the hybridization format involved, as will be described in detail below, chemically linked intercalation complexes can be used in a variety of manners in the present invention. They can be formed in situ in the hybridization reaction mixture or in a process step thereafter, or can be a step in the synthesis of a labeled probe or sample nucleic acid. In the latter case, where intercalation occurs in the region of complementarity between the probe and sample nucleic acids, mono-linkages will be accomplished followed by denaturing of such region to yield single stranded nucleic acid with chemically linked intercalator oriented such that upon hybridization, the linked intercalator will assume an intercalation position.
The probe will comprise at least one single stranded base sequence substantially complementary to or homologous with the sequence to be detected. However, such base sequence need not be a single continuous polynucleotide segment, but can be comprised of two or more individual segments interrupted by nonhomologous sequences. These nonhomologous sequences can be linear, or they can be self-complementary and form hairpin loops. In addition, the homologous region of the probe can be flanked at the 3'- and 5'-terminii by nonhomologous sequences, such as those comprising the DNA or RNA of a vector into which the homologous sequence had been inserted for propagation. In either instance, the probe as presented as an analytical reagent will exhibit detectable hybridization at one or more points with sample nucleic acids of interest. Linear or circular single stranded polynucleotides can be used as the probe element, with major or minor portions being duplexed with a complementary polynucleotide strand or strands, provided that the critical homologous segment or segments are in single stranded form and available for hybridization with sample DNA or RNA. Particularly preferred will be linear or circular probes wherein the homologous probe sequence is in essentially only single stranded form [see particularly, Hu and Messing, Gene 17:271-277(1982)].
Where the probe is used in a hybridization format calling for use of an intercalator-labeled probe, as will be seen below, such probe can be in a variety of forms such as a completely single stranded polynucleotide having intercalator chemically linked thereto whereby hybridization results in formation of intercalation complexes. Alternatively, the probe can comprise a double stranded portion or portions which have been intercalated, optionally with covalent linkage of the intercalator to one or both strands in the duplex.
In terms of hybridization formats, the present invention is focused on formation of a hybridization aggregate comprising the hybridized probe and the intercalator bound to duplexes in the form of the antibody-detectable intercalation complexes. Thus, the event of hybridization is associated with the formation of the detectable intercalation complexes. Fundamentally, the resulting intercalation complexes in the aggregate can be in the region of hybridization between the sample and probe nucleic acids or can be in a double stranded region remote from the hybridization region. In such latter case, the intercalated region can be formed during the assay or can be in the intercalated state when brought to the assay, e.g., covalently linked or noncovalently intercalated double stranded regions serving as labels for the probe.
Practice of the present analytical method is not limited to any particular hybridization format. Any conventionl hybridization technique can be used. As improvements are made and as conceptually new formats are developed, such can be readily applied to carrying out the present method. Conventional hybridization formats which are particularly useful include those wherein the sample nucleic acids or the polynucleotide probe is immobilized on a solid support (solid-phase hybridization) and those wherein the polynucleotide species are all in solution (solution hybridization).
In solid-phase hybridization formats, one of the polynucleotide species participating in hybridization is fixed in an appropriate manner in its single stranded form to a solid support. Useful solid supports are well known in the art and include those which bind nucleic acids either covalently or noncovalently. Noncovalent supports which are generally understood to involve hydrophobic bonding include naturally occurring and synthetic polymeric materials, such as nitrocellulose, derivatized nylon, and fluorinated polyhydrocarbons, in a variety of forms such as filters or solid sheets. Covalent binding supports are also useful and comprise materials having chemically reactive groups or groups, such as dichlorotriazine, diazobenzyloxymethyl, and the like, which can be activated for binding to polynucleotides.
A typical solid-phase hybridization technique begins with immobilization of sample nucleic acids onto the support in single stranded form. This initial step essentially prevents reannealing of complementary strands from the sample and can be used as a means for concentrating sample material on the support for enhanced detectability. The polynucleotide probe is then contacted with the support and hybridization detected by antibody binding as described herein. The solid support provides a convenient means for separating antibody which binds to intercalation complexes associated with hybridized probe from that which does not so bind.
Another method of interest is the sandwich hybridization technique wherein one of two mutually exclusive fragments of the homologous sequence of the probe is immobilized and the other is labeled. The presence of the polynucleotide sequence of interest results in dual hybridization to the immobilized and labeled probe segments, again with the same ultimate measurement of support-associated intercalation complexes. See Methods in Enzymology 65:468(1980) and Gene 21:77-85(1983) for further details.
For purposes of better illustration, the following solid-phase hybridization methods are particularly useful in the present invention. Schematic diagrams of these basic methods are provided in the drawings.
Method type 1
In this method, illustrated in FIG. 2, the single stranded nucleic acids from the liquid test medium are first immobilized on a solid support. A hybridization reaction mixture is then formed by contacting the immobilized sample nucleic acids (S) with the probe (P) which in this case comprises, in addition to the complementary single stranded portion, at least one double stranded portion which is chemically linked with the intercalator (I) in the form of intercalation complexes. A particularly useful form of the probe is the circular form described by Hu and Messing, supra. The resulting hybridization aggregate comprises the immobilized polynucleotide of interest hybridized with the probe which has a covalently linked, intercalculated double stranded region. The solid support carrying immobilized duplexes is then preferentially separated from the remainder of the reaction mixture. The antibody (Ab) is added, preferably labeled with a detectable group, and the resulting immobilized antibody bound to intercalation complexes in the aggregate is separated from the remainder of the reaction mixture. The antibody bound to the support is then determined to complete the assay. Alternatively, the antibody in the separated solution can be determined; although this will generally be less preferred since a large excess of antibody is normally used.
A variation of this method is to employ a probe such as above, but not having covalently linked intercalator bound to the double stranded region. Rather, the intercalator is added to the immobilized aggregate resulting in the formation of intercalator complexes in both the double stranded portion of the probe and the duplexed region formed by hybridization.
Method type 2
This is a sandwich format and is illustrated in FIG. 3. A reaction mixture is formed among the test medium containing the sequence of interest (S) and the first and second probes, each comprising respectively at least one base sequence complementary to a mutually exclusive portion of the sequence of interest. The first probe (P1) is immobilized on a solid support and the second probe (P2) is labeled with covalently linked, intercalation complexes as in Method type 1 above. The resulting hybridization aggregate comprises the sequence of interest hybridized to both the immobilized first probe and the intercalation complex-labeled second probe. The antibody is added, preferably in labeled form, and the resulting immobilized antibody bound to intercalation complexes in the aggregate is separated from the remainder of the reaction mixture. The bound antibody is determined to then complete the assay.
There are several useful variations of this method. First, as in the case of the variation of Method type 1, one can employ a probe which does not comprise covalently linked intercalator, but rather can add free intercalator to the immobilized aggregate resulting in the formation of intercalator complexes with all available double stranded regions. Also, as an alternative to using a second probe with a double stranded portion, one can use a probe of entirely single stranded nucleic acid with intercalator chemically linked thereto so that upon hybridization there are formed intercalation complexes, or with intercalator being added so that intercalation occurs between the duplexes formed between the two probes and the sequence to be detected.
Method type 3
FIG. 4 illustrates a further preferred solid-phase format. The sample nucleic acids are contacted with immobilized probe and preferably the resulting immobilized duplexes are separated from the remainder of the reaction mixture. In this format, the probe is in single stranded form. The resulting hybridization product comprises the immobilized probe hybridized with the sequence of interest. Also, this format allows significant reannealing between complementary regions of sample nucleic acid which can take place on the immobilized aggregate. Such reannealing works to the advantages of the assay since it provides additional double stranded nucleic acid for subsequent intercalation. The next step in the assay is to add intercalator and the antibody, again preferably in a labeled form. The assay is completed by separation and antibody determination steps as in the previous formats.
Method type 4
In this method, illustrated in FIG. 5, the single stranded sample nucleic acids are contacted with immobilized probe where, in this case, such probe is chemically linked, e.g., covalently, to the intercalator such that duplex formation in the region of the linked intercalator results in formation of intercalation complexes. This is a highly advantageous format in that it is the only known technique wherein the probe is both immobilized and labeled, requiring no immobilization or labeling step to be performed at the time of the assay. The resulting aggregate comprises covalently linked, intercalation complexes in the region of hybridization between sample and probe nucleic acids and in any reannealed sample regions. Antibody is then added and the assay completed as in the previous formats. This format provides the advantage of eliminating the need for the analyst to handle solutions of the free intercalator which in some cases can be potentially hazardous. A simple variation of this technique is to immobilize sample nucleic acids rather than the labeled probe and proceed in the normal fashion. This is somewhat less advantageous but is a practical assay approach.
A variety of solution-phase hybridization formats can also be applied to the present invention. Such formats are characterized by the feature that the hybridization step involves soluble forms of both the sample nucleic acids and the probe. This can result in significantly faster hybridizations since the kinetics are much faster when both strands are in solution compared to when on is immobilized. Normally, subsequent to the hybridization step, the resulting hybrids are rendered immobile for purposes of detection. Such immobilization can be accomplished in a variety of ways. Conventionally it is known to selectively immobilize cuplexes by exposure to adsorbents such as hydroxyapatite and nitrocellulose membranes.
A particularly useful approach to immobilizing hybrids formed from a solution-phase hybridization involves the use of a probe which comprises a binding site for a binding substance. After the hybridization step then, one can add an immobilized form of the binding substance which will effectively bind and immobilize the hybrids through the binding site on the probe. Such binding site can be present in a single stranded hybridizable portion of the probe or can be present as a result of a chemical modification of the probe. Examples of binding sites existing in the nucleotide sequence are where the probe comprises a promoter sequence (e.g., lac-promoter, trp-promoter) which is bindable by a promoter protein (e.g., bacteriophage promoters, RNA polymerase), or comprises an operator sequence (e.g., lac operator) which is bindable by a repressor protein (e.g., lac repressor), or comprises rare, antigenic nucleotides or sequences (e.g., 5-bromo or 5-iododeoxyuridine, Z-DNA) which are bindable by specific antibodies [see also British Pat. Spec. No. 2,125,964]. Binding sites introduced by chemical modification of the probe are particularly useful and normally involve linking one member of a specific binding pair to the probe nucleic acid. Useful binding pairs from which to choose include biotin/avidin, haptens and antigens/antibodies, MS-1320-CIP-II carbohydrates/lectins, enzymes/inhibitors, and the like. Where the binding pair consists of a proteinaceous member and a nonproteinaceous member, it will be preferred to link the nonproteinaceous member to the probe since the proteinaceous member may be unstable under the denaturing conditions of hybridization of the probe. Preferable systems involve linking the probe with biotin or a hapten and employing immobilized avidin or anti-hapten antibody, respectively. Preparation of useful ligand-labeled probes is known in the literature [Langer et al (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 78:6633; Broker (1978) Nucl. Acids Res. 5:363; Sodja et al (1978) Nucl. Acids Res. 5:385; Tchen et al (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81:3466]. Immobilization of the binding substane can follow conventional techniques.
A large variety of methods are known for immobilizing proteins on solid supports and these methods are applicable to the immobilization of the binding substance [see Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 44(1976)]. Antibodies, for example, are immobilized either by covalent coupling or by noncovalent adsorption. Noncovalent methods frequently employed are adsorption to polystyrene beads or microparticles and to polyvinylchloride surface. Many covalent methods are used for immobilizing proteins and a few include cyanogen bromide activated agaroses and dextrans; glutaraldehyde activated nylons and polyacrylamides; and epoxides on acrylic and other supports.
The above illustrative methods are particularly preferred, however, the present invention is not limited to any particular hybridization format. Any approach to an assay can be followed provided that detectable intercalation complexes result in association with hybridization of the probe nucleic acid. For instance, in addition to the above methods, one can devise a solution phase hybridization format wherein a solid-phase antibody to intercalation complexes is employed to immobilize hybridized probe. There will be sufficient intercalation complexes formed in the hybridization product between sample and probe nucleic acids, the latter being in essentially only single stranded form, such that both solid-phase antibody and labeled antibody can bind. The amount of label associated with the solid-phase is then measured and is related to the presence of the sequence to be determined. Other useful formats will be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art.
A fundamental principle of the present invention is the ability to first bind an antibody, or a fragment or some other equivalent thereof, to the hybridization aggregate comprising hybridized probe and then to detect such antibody binding. As stated above, the antibody reagent can consist of whole antibodies, antibody fragments, polyfunctional antibody aggregates, or in general any substance comprising one or more intercalation complex-specific binding sites from an antibody. When in the form of whole antibody, it can belong to any of the classes and subclasses of known immunoglobulines, e.g., IgG, IgM, and so forth. Any fragment of any such antibody which retains specific binding affinity for intercalation complexes can also be employed, for instance, the fragments of IgG conventionally known as Fab, F(ab'), and F(ab')2. In addition, aggregates, polymers, and conjugates of immunoglobulins or their fragments can be used where appropriate.
The immunoglobulin source for the antibody reagent can be obtained in any available manner such as conventional antiserum and monoclonal techniques. Antiserum can be obtained by well-established techniques involving immunization of an animal, such as a mouse, rabbit, guinea pig or goat, with an appropriate immunogen. The immunogen will usually comprise an ionic complex between a cationic protein or protein derivative (e.g., methylated bovine serum albumin) and the anionic intercalator-nucleic acid complex. Ideally, the intercalator should be covalently coupled to the double stranded nucleic acid. Alternatively, the intercalator-DNA conjugate can be covalently coupled to a carrier protein. The immunoglobulins can also be obtained by somatic cell hybridization techniques, such resulting in what are commonly referred to as monoclonal antibodies. The immunogen used for primary injections leading to hybridoma formation will be as described above.
The antibody reagent will be characterized by its ability to bind with an intercalation complex formed between a selected intercalator and double stranded nucleic acid in general without regard to the specific base sequences proximate to the site of intercalation. Furthermore, it will be substantially incapable of binding to single stranded nucleic acids or to free intercalator. As a result, antibody binding will occur only at intercalation complexes which by proper design of the assay format will be significantly present only in association with hybridized probe.
The binding of the antibody reagent to the hybridization aggregate in the present method can be detected by any convenient technique. Advantageously, the antibody reagent will itself be labeled with a detectable chemical group. Such detectable chemical group can be any material having a detectable physical or chemical property. Such materials have been well-developed in the field of immunoassays and in general most any label useful in such methods can be applied to the present invention. Particularly useful are enzymatically active groups, such as enzymes (see Clin. Chem. (1976)22:1243), enzyme substrates (see British Pat. Spec. 1,548,741), coenzymes (see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,230,797 and 4,238,565), and enzyme inhibitors (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,134,792); fluorescers (see Clin. Chem. (1979)25:353); chromophores; luminescers such as chemiluminescers and bioluminescers (see (Clin. Chem. (1979)25:512, and ibid, 1531); specifically bindable ligands; proximal interacting pairs; and radioisotopes such as 3 H, 35 S, 32 P, 125 I, and 14 C. Such labels and labeling pairs are detected on the basis of their own physical properties (e.g., fluorescers, chromophores and radioisotopes) or their reactive or binding properties (e.g., enzymes, substrates, coenzymes and inhibitors). For example, a cofactor-labeled antibody can be detected by adding the enzymefor which the label is a cofactor and a substrate for the enzyme. A hapten or ligand (e.g., biotin) labeled antibody can be detected by adding an antibody to the hapten or a protein (e.g., avidin) which binds the ligand, tagged with a detectable molecule. Such detectable molecule can be some molecule with a measurable physical property (e.g., fluorescence or absorbance) or a participant in an enzyme reaction (e.g., see above list). For example, one can use an enzyme which acts upon a substrate to generate a product with a measurable physical property. Examples of the latter include, but are not limited to, β-galactosidase, alkaline phosphatase and peroxidase. For in situ hybridization studies, ideally the final product is water insoluble. Proximal interacting or linking labels as are known in the immunoassay field (see Clin. Chem. 27:1797(1981) and U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,996,345 and 4,233,402) can be applied to the present method by using two different populations of antibodies, one labeled with one member of the pair and the other labeled with the other of the pair. For instance, a first portion of antibodies to intercalation complexes is labeled with a fluorescer and a second portion is labeled with a quencher. The presence of intercalation complexes is indicated by quenching of fluorescence due to the proximate binding of first and second portion antibodies along the intercalated nucleic acid duplex. Similarly, one can use first and second enzyme labels where the product of one is a substrate for the other. The presence of complexes is then indicated by increased turnover by the second enzyme due to a proximate enzyme channeling effect. Other labeling schemes will be evident to one of ordinary skill in the art.
Alternatively, the antibody can be detected based on a native property such as its own antigenicity. A labeled anti-(antibody) antibody will bind to the primary antibody reagent where the label for the second antibody is any conventional label as above. Further, antibody can be detected by complement fixation or the use of labeled protein A, as well as other techniques known in the art for detecting antibodies.
Where the antibody is labeled, as is preferred, the labeling moiety and the antibody reagent are associated or linked to one another by direct chemical linkage such as involving covalent bonds, or by indirect linkage such as by incorporation of the label in a microcapsule or liposome which is in turn linked to the antibody. Labeling techniques are well-known in the art and any convenient method can be used in the present invention.
The test sample to be assayed can be any medium of interest, and will usually be a liquid sample of medical, veterinary, environmental, nutritional, or industrial significance. Human and animal specimens and body fluids particularly can be assayed by the present method, including urine, blood (serum or plasma), milk, cerebrospinal fluid, sputum, fecal matter, lung aspirates, throat swabs, genital swabs and exudates, rectal swabs, and nasopharnygal aspirates. Where the test sample obtained from the patient or other source to be tested contains principally double stranded nucleic acids, such as contained in cells, the sample will be treated to denature the nucleic acids, and if necessary first to release nucleic acids from cells. Denaturation of nucleic acids is preferably accomplished by heating in boiling water or alkali treatment (e.g., 0.1N sodium hydroxide), which if desired, can simultaneously be used to lyse cells. Also, release of nucleic acids can, for example, be obtained by mechanical disruption (freeze/thaw, abrasion, sonication), physical/chemical disruption (detergents such as Triton, Tween, sodium dodecylsulfate, alkali treatment, osmotic shock, or heat), or enzymatic lysis (lysozyme, proteinase K, pepsin). The resulting test medium will contain nucleic acids in single stranded form which can then be assayed according to the present hybridization method.
As is known in the art, various hybridization conditions can be employed in the assay. Typically, hybridization will proceed at slightly elevated temperatures, e.g., between about 35° and 70° C. and usually around 65° C., in a solution comprising buffer at pH between about 6 and 8 and with appropriate ionic strength (e.g., 2XSSC where 1XSSC=0.15M sodium chloride and 0.015M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), protein such as bovine serum albumin, Ficoll (a trademark identifying a copolymer of sucrose and epichlorohydrin sold by Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Piscataway, NJ), polyvinylpyrrolidone, and a denatured foreign DNA such as from calf thymus or salmon sperm. The degree of complementarity between the sample and probe strands required for hybridization to occur depends on the stringency of the conditions. The extent and specificity of hybridization is affected by the following principal conditions:
1. The purity of the nucleic acid preparation.
2. Base composition of the probe--G-C base pairs will exhibit greater thermal stability than A-T base pairs. Thus, hybridizations involving higher G-C content will be stable at higher temperatures.
3. Length of homologous base sequence--Any short sequence of bases (e.g., less than 6 bases), has a high degree of probability of being present in many nucleic acids. Thus, little or no specificity can be attained in hybridizations involving such short sequences. The present homologous probe sequence will be at least 10 bases, usually 20 bases or more, and preferably greater than 100 bases. From a practical standpoint, the homologous probe sequence will often be between 300-1000 nucleotides.
4. Ionic strength--The rate of reannealing increases as the ionic strength of the incubation solution increases. Thermal stability of hybrids also increases.
5. Incubation temperature--Optimal reannealing occurs at a temperature about 25°-30° C. below the melting temperature (Tm) for a given duplex. Incubation at temperatures significantly below the optimum allows less related base sequences to hybridize.
6. Nucleic acid concentration and incubation time--Normally, to drive the reaction towards hybridization, one of the hybridizable sample nucleic acid or probe nucleic acid will be present in excess, usually 100 fold excess or greater.
7. Denaturing reagents--The presence of hydrogen bond disrupting agents such as formamide and urea increases the stringency of hybridization.
8. Incubation time--The longer the incubation time the more complete will be the hybridization. 9. Volume exclusion agents--The presence of these agents, as exemplified by dextran and dextran sulfate, are thought to effectively increase the concentration of the hybridizing elements thereby increasing the rate of resulting hybridization.
Normally, the antibody reagent, and the intercalator in the case of formats wherein it is added as a free compound, are not present in the hybridization solution, however, this is not precluded where desired and where the hybridization conditions are favorable to antibody binding and intercalation. In the usual case, intercalation complexes associated with hybridized probe are detected after separation of hybridized probe from the hybridization solution. Where intercalator is added as a free compound, its concentration will normally be chosen so as to be sufficient to saturate the intercalation complexes present but not so great that significant, e.g., greater than 10 percent, self-stacking of intercalator occurs. The conditions for intercalation will generally be mild, e.g., at a pH between about 6 and 8, moderate ionic strength (≦1), room temperature, with no extended incubation necessary, i.e., less than 15 minutes in the usual case.
For detection of intercalation complex, antibody to the complex is added in excess and allowed to incubate for the time required to form a detectable product (e.g., 5 minutes to 24 hours) under conditions of neutral pH (e.g., between 6 and 8), moderate ionic strength (≦1) and moderate temperature (20°-40° C.). Excess (unbound) antibody is then removed by washing under similar conditions.
It may be necessary or desirable to modify the procedure above by including an intercalator in the washing step to maintain saturation of the nucleic acid-intercalator complex. Also, if desired some or all of the steps above can be combined, such as adding the intercalating agent and antibody simultaneously.
The present invention additionally provides a reagent system, i.e., reagent combination or means, comprising all of the essential elements required to conduct a desired assay method. The reagent system is presented in a commercially packaged form, as a composition or admixture where the compatability of the reagents will allow, in a test device configuration, or more usually as a test kit, i.e., a packaged combination of one or more containers, devices, or the like holding the necessary reagents, and usually including written instructions for the performance of assays. Reagent systems of the present invention include all configurations and compositions for performing the various hybridization formats described herein, particularly the four method types particularly illustrated above and in the drawings.
In all cases, the reagent system will comprise (1) a probe, (2) a nucleic acid intercalator as described herein, and (3) the antibody reagent, preferably labeled with a detectable chemical group also as described herein. The system can additionally comprise a solid support for immobilizing single stranded nucleic acids from the test medium. Alternatively, the probe element can be presented immobilized on such a support. Further, the intercalator can be present in the reagent system as a separate, free compound, substantially uncomplexed with nucleic acids, or can be bound to the probe either in the form of intercalation complexes where the probe comprises a double stranded region, and optionally covalently or otherwise chemically linked to one or both of the strands, or by being chemically linked, e.g., covalently, to a single stranded probe region such that duplex formation in such region results in the formation of intercalation complexes. In the case of the sandwich format, a second probe as described above is included in the system. A test kit form of the system can additionally include ancillary chemicals such as the components of the hybridization solution and denaturation agents capable of converting double stranded nucleic acids in a test sample into single stranded form. Preferably, there is included a chemical lysing and denaturing agent, e.g., alkali, for treating the sample to release single stranded nucleic acid therefrom.
The present invention will now be illustrated, but is not intended to be limited, by the following examples:
The nucleic acid probe is a modified M13mp9 vector (Messing and Vieria (1982) Gene. 19:269; commercially available from New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) containing an 800 bp insert between the Hinc II and EcoRI restriction endonuclease sites of RFM13mp9. The 800 base insert is a fragment of the 1,190 base tufA sequence from E. coli; and is the portion of the probe (which is comprised of vector and insert) which will actually hybridize to the specimen nucleic acid. It will be referred to as the tufA insert. The modified M13mp9 bacteriophage is denoted M13-10 and is available through the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD (ATCC 39403-B1).
The E. coli base organism used for propagation of M13-10 phage is JM103 [(Δlac pro), supE, thi, strA, endA sbcB, hsdR-, F'traD36, proAB, lacIq, ZΔM15] which is commercially available from Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD. E. coli JM103 is transformed with M13-10 DNA, and a culture of JM103 is subsequently infected with the transformed JM103. The single stranded form of M13-10 is isolated from the phage particles excreted into the medium by the infected E. coli. The phage particles are harvested and the single stranded M13-10 DNA is isolated following standard procedures [Messing et al (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9:309].
Using an oligonucleotide primer complementary to the M13mp9 vector on the 5' terminus of the tufA insert, deoxynucleoside triphosphates and E. coli DNA polymerase (Klenow Fragment), a second DNA strand is synthesized. This second strand is synthesized with limiting quantities of deoxynucleoside triphosphates such that it does not extend to the tufA insert because this insert must remain substantially single stranded for the probe to be useful in a hybridization assay. This technique has been described in the literature [Hu and Messing (1982) Gene 17:271-277] and the oligonucleotide primer (sequence CACAATTCCACACAAC) is commercially available from New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA.
The amount of double stranded DNA present in the M13-10 probe can be estimated by using a radiolabeled nucleoside triphosphate in the second strand synthesis or by S1 nuclease digestion followed by a fluorescence assay with ethidium bromide.
The double stranded region of the M13-10 probe prepared as described above is intercalated and covalently linked with ethidium in a photoaffinity reaction using a photolabeled ethidium derivative, 8-azidoethidium. This photoreactive intercalator is prepared and isolated as described in the literature [Graves et al (1977), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 479:98-104]. Its binding to double stranded DNA has been shown to mimic that of its parent compound, ethidium bromide [Bolton and Kearns (1978) Nucl. Acids. Res. 5:4891; Garland et al (1980) Biochem. 19:3221--our studies indicate that this procedure gives a mixture of 3-azido and 8-azidoethidium isomers]. Because 8-azidoethidium is photoreactive, standard precautions must be taken in handling it to prevent decomposition. Working in the dark in the presence of a red photographic safelight has been found to be satisfactory. Solutions of 8-azidoethidium may be stored frozen in the dark at -70° C. for at least one month.
Photolysis with visible light converts the azido moiety in 8-azidoethidium to a chemically reactive nitrene, which will quickly react with available nucleophiles to form covalent ethidium adducts [Knowles (1971) Acc. Chem. Res. 5:155]. If 8-azidoethidium is intercalated between the base pairs of DNA when photolysis occurs, covalently coupling of ethidium to DNA occurs with high efficiency [Bolton and Kearns (1978) Nucl. Acids Res. 5:4891].
Ethidium is covalently coupled to the double stranded region of M13-10 by photolysis of a solution containing approximately 1 mM DNA base pairs and 0.5 mM 8-azidoethidium in an appropriate buffer such as 20 mM tris-(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris-HCl), 200 mM sodium chloride (NaCl), pH 8.0. Photolysis is accomplished with a 150 watt outdoor spotlight, with the stirred reaction 5-20 centimeters (cm) away from the light source. To prevent the photolysis reaction from overheating and to block out any short wavelength radiation, i.e., less than 300 nanometers (nm), the photolysis reaction is surrounded by a glass water bath which is connected to a water circulator with temperature regulation. After an appropriate incubation period such as 60 minutes, ethidium groups not covalently bound to DNA are removed by a series, e.g., 10, of successive extractions with an equal volume of water saturated n-butanol. Additional 8-azidoethidium (final concentration in the range of 0.4 mM) is added and the photolysis and extraction steps are repeated. The amount of ethidium associated with the DNA is estimated using extinction coefficient values of ε490 ≈4×103 M-1 cm-1 for photolyzed ethidium azide the relationship between A260 and A490 for photolyzed ethidium bound to DNA [A260 =(A490 ×3.4)-0.011], and ε260 ≈1.32×104 M-1 cm-1 for the concentration of DNA base pairs of a given DNA being labeled. Preferably, the probe is saturated with ethidium such that there is 1 ethidium moiety for every 2 DNA base pairs in the double stranded region of the probe. The photolysis reaction and extractions are repeated until the desired labeling density is obtained.
Sandwich hybridization formats are described in the literature--Dunn and Hassell (1977) Cell 12:23; Dunn and Sambrook (1980) Methods in Enzymology 65:468, Ranki et al (1983) Gene 21:77; Ranki et al (1983) Curr. Topics in Microbiology and Immunol. 104:307-310.
This approach requires two nucleic acid probes, each of which is complementary to a unique region of the nucleic acid being tested in a specimen. One of the probes is immobilized on a solid support while the other is labeled in some manner and is initially in solution with the specimen nucleic acids. These will be referred to as the solid and solution phase probes, respectively.
The solid and solution phase probes are prepared from restriction endonuclease digests of DNA from adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) as described by Ranki et al (1980) Gene 21:77-85. The solid phase probe is comprised of BamH1 fragments C or D [Tooze (1980) "The Molecular Biology of Tumor Viruses" (2nd ed) Part 2: DNA Tumor viruses, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 933-934] of Ad2 DNA inserted in a pBR322 vector. These probes have been denoted pkTH1201 and pkTH1202, respectively. The solution phase probe is comprised of a BamH1 and Bg1II restriction endonucleoase digest of pkTH1201 in which fragments are shotgun-cloned into the BamH1 restriction endonuclease site of M13mp7 [Messing et al (1981) Nuc. Acids Res. 9:309]. The modified M13mp7 containing as an insert a fragment of the Ad2 C fragment is designated mkTH2306.
The solution probe mkTH1206 is made partially double stranded as described in Part I-A above and the double stranded region is labeled with an intercalating agent, e.g., ethidium, also as described in Part I-A above.
The EcoRI restriction endonuclease fragment O from human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) strain AD169 [Tamashiro et al (1982) J. Virol., May, 547-556; Chou and Merigan (1983) New Engl. J. of Med. 308:921] is cloned into the pBR322 derivative pACYC184 which is used to transfect E. coli strain HB101 Rec A- as described by Tamashiro et al. After propagation and purification at the insert-bearing pACYC184, the plasmid is digested with restriction endonuclease EcoRI and the 6.8 kb O fragment of HCMV is purified by preparative electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels using standard procedures [Maniatis et al (1982) "Molecular Cloning", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY].
The purified double-stranded O fragment from Part I-C above is then covalently labeled with ethidium by using the photolabile ethidium derivative, 8-azidoethidium, as described in Part I-A above.
Calf thymus or salmon sperm DNA is sheared by repetitive passage through a hypodermic needle, treated with S1 nuclease to remove single stranded regions [Maniatis (1982) "Molecular Cloning", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY] and separated from the resulting nucleotides by any one of a number of standard methods (e.g., ethanol precipitation, gel exclusion chromatograhy, or ion exchange chromatography).
The purified double stranded DNA is then covalently coupled to the photolabile ethidium derivative 8-azidoethidium by photolysis as described in Part I-A above. A carrier protein is prepared by methylation of carboxylic acid residues (Mandell and Hershey (1960) Anal. Biochem. 1:66) then combined with the intercator-labeled DNA to form an electrostatically associated nucleic acid-protein complex as described in Poirier et al (1982) PNAS 79:6443.
Polyclonal antiserum against inercalator-DNA complexes is elicited in rabbits using the immunization techniques and schedules described in the literature [Stollar (1980) Methods in Enzymology 70:70]. The antiserum is screened in a solid phase assay similar to that used for monoclonal antibodies, e.g., as described by Lange et al (1976) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 25:191; Pisetsky et al (1981) J. Immun. Methods 41:187. The initial screening criterion would be binding to the intercalator-DNA complex.
The IgG fraction of the antisera containing antibodies is isolated from other serum proteins by ammonium sulfate precipitation followed by chromatography on DEAE cellulose [Livingston (1974) Methods in Enzymology 34:723].
The IgG fraction of the antisera is purified further by affinity chromotography on a column containing a resin on which the DNA-intercalator complex is immobilized [Stollar (1980) Methods in Enzymology 70:70]. After applying the IgG fraction to the column, nonspecifically bound protein is removed by washing, and the specific antibodies eluted with 2M acetic acid in the cold [Stollar (1980) ibid].
The purified antibodies are screened more thoroughly to determine their usefulness in the hybridization assay. The antibodies must bind the intercalator-DNA complex with high affinity (preferably, KA ≧1010 M-1); cross-reactivity with free intercalator or single stranded DNA is not acceptable. Depending upon the assay format, some cross-reactivity of the antibodies with double stranded DNA is acceptable.
Using the intercalator-DNA immunogen prepared as described above, mouse monoclonal antibodies to the intercalator-DNA complex are obtained using standard procedures [Galfre and Milstein (1981) Methods in Enzym. 73:1]. The monoclonal antibodies are screened using a modification of the techniques described in the literature, e.g., Lange et al (1976) Clin. Exp. Immunol. 25:191; Pisctsky et al (1981) J. Immun. Methods 41:187). To be useful in the assay for detection of DNA-intercalator complexes, a monoclonal antibody should bind to the DNA intercalator complex with high affinity (preferably, KA ≧1010 M-1), but cannot bind to single stranded DNA or free intercalating agent. Cross-reactivity with double stranded DNA may be acceptable in some of the assay formats.
Mouse monoclonal antibody is purified in a two step procedure. The neat ascites fluid is applied to a column of Affi-Gel Blue resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) equilibrated with 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.15M NaCl, pH 8.0, and eluted with the same buffer. This step removes albumin, which is retained on the column. The final step in the purification is application to DEAE-Sepharose (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Piscataway, NJ) and elution with a linear gradient of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, to 10 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl. This gives purified mouse monoclonal antibody free from contaminating serum proteins such as albumin and transferrin.
β-galactosidase (30,000 units, grade VIII, commercially available from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in 2 ml of a buffer solution comprised of 0.1M N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N'-2-ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES), 0.09M NaCl, pH 7.0. This gave a β-galactosidase solution containing 37.7 mg of protein (70 nmol) in 1.84 ml. A 3.5 μmol portion (a 50-fold molar excess) of dithiothreitol (DTT) was added to this solution, and the mixture allowed to stand at room temperature for four hours.
DTT was removed from the enzyme solution by chromatographing the mixture on a 2.5×80 cm column of Sepharose 6B.Cl resin (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Piscataway, NJ) using as the eluent the HEPES/NaCl buffer described above. Protein-containing fractions were pooled to give a total volume of 15 ml. Using an E280 1 %=20.9 [Worthington Enzyme Manual (1977), Worthington Biochemical Corporation, Freehold, NJ, p. 195], the β-galactosidase concentration was determined to be 9.62 mg/ml. The number of sulfhydryl groups on the enzyme was determined to be 11.0 using Ellman's reagent [Ellman (1959) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82:70]. Typically this protocol gives 9-15 free sulfhydryl groups per β-galactosidase molecule.
The heterobifunctional coupling reagent succinimidyl-4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (SMCC, available from Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) was used to couple β-galactosidase to an antibody. This coupling reagent contains a maleimido group which selectively reacts with sulfhydryl moieties and an N-hydroxysuccinimide ester for coupling to amino groups. The coupling procedure is comprised of two steps: reacting SMCC with antibody amino groups followed by coupling the derivatized antibody to β-galactosidase by reaction of the maleimido moiety with β-galactosidase sulfhydryl groups.
A 5.3 mg portion of SMCC was dissolved in 250 μl of anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). The actual concentration of reactive maleimide groups in this solution was determined by reaction with a known quantity of glutathione, followed by determining the quantity of glutathione sulfhydryl groups using Ellman's reagent (ibid). For example, 40 μl of the DMF solution was diluted to 3 ml with HEPES/0.015M NaCl buffer. A 25 μl volume of this aqueous solution of SMCC solution was then combined with 825 μl HEPES/NaCl buffer and 100 μl of 1 mM glutathione. After standing at room temperature for 15 minutes, the amount of unreacted glutathione was determined using Ellman's reagent (ibid) and the appropriate standards (i.e., unreacted glutathione and a blank with no glutathione). Several determinations were made for each SMCC solution, and their results averaged. This protocol indicated that the DMF solution of SMCC prepared as described above was 52 mM in reactive maleimide groups.
A 6.0 mg (40 μmol) portion of a mouse monoclonal antibody was combined with 400 μmol of SMCC in a final volume of 533 μl of HEPES/0.15M NaCl and allowed to react 1 hour at 30° C. The reaction mixture was then applied to a 1×24 cm column of Bio-Gel P-2 resin (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) and eluted with HEPES/0.15M NaCl. All protein containing fractions were pooled; the protein concentration was determined using the method of Sedmack and Grossberg [Anal. Biochem. 79:544(1977)] and the number of maleimide groups were determined as described above. These determinations indicated an antibody concentration of 1.98 mg/ml, with 1-2 maleimides/antibody molecule.
A 28 mg portion of the antibody-maleimide conjugate was combined with 10 mg of DTT-treated β-galactosidase (final volume 2.45 μl) and allowed to react 4 hours at room temperature. The mixture was then applied to a 2.5×80 cm column of Sepharose 6B.Cl (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) and eluted with HEPES/0.15M NaCl at 4° C. The flow rate was 4 ml/hr; 3 ml fractions were collected. Fractions were assayed for β-galactosidase activity and antibody binding capacity. Fractions 39-42 had both properties and were pooled.
Purified antisera is treated with the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of biotin (commercially available from Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO or Biosearch, San Rafael, CA) using the methods described in the literature [Oi et al (1982), J. Cell. Biol. 93:981; Heitzmann et al (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:3537; Green (1975) Adv. Protein Chem. 29:85].
Purified antibody is radiolabeled following procedures given in the literature. Radioiodination is accomplished by reaction of the antibodies with 125 I-labeled 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (commercially available from New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) following the protocol of Bolton and Hunter [Biochem. J. 133:529 (1973)]. Alternatively, the antibody fraction is covalently coupled with a bifunctional chelating agent [Yeh et al (1979) Anal. Biochem. 100:152] and is subsequently labeled with an appropriate radioactive metal ion. This latter approach has the advantage that the shelf life of the antibody fraction is not limited by the half life of a radioisotope.
An alkaline phosphatase-biotin-avidin complex is prepared as described by Leary et al [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:4045 (1983)] Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase is first cross-linked by reaction with disuccimidyl suberate, then coupled with the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of biotinyl-ε-aminocaproic acid. After purification, the alkaline phosphatase-biotin complex is labeled with avidin (which has 4 biotin binding sites/avidin molecule) by combining the alkaline phosphatase-biotin complex with a slight molar excess of avidin. Either avidin or a bacterial analog of avidin, steptavidin [Hofmann et al (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:4666-4668; commercially available from Bethesda Research Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD] may be used in this last step.
The detection system used for the alkaline phosphatase-biotin-avidin complex is comprised of nitro blue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate as described by Leary et al (ibid).
Because its sequence is highly conserved, the tufA sequence from E. coli can be used to detect the presence of gram negative bacteria in urine specimens. Clinical urine samples are clarified by centrifugation for a short period of time (e.g., 5 min.) at a low centrifugal force (e.g., 8000 rpms with a Sorvall GLC-3 centrifuge). Bacterial cells in the supernatant are lysed and the bacterial genome is denatured by making the urine specimen 0.5M in sodium hydroxide (NaOH) for 10 minutes at an elevated temperature (65° C.). Alternatively, this may be done by heating the urine to 90° C. and maintaining that temperature for 10 minutes. After lysis and denaturation, the urine sample is diluted and neutralized with an equal volume of 20XSSPE (3.6M NaCl, 0.2M NaPO4, 20 mM EDTA, pH 7.7). The urine specimen is then immediately filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane under mild vacuum. The immobilized bacterial DNA is then fixed to the nitrocellolose membrane by baking in vacuo at 80° C. for 2 hours. The filter containing the immobilized specimen DNA is treated with prehybridization solution [0.1% (w/v) each Ficoll (Pharmacia), polyvinylpyrrolidone and BSA in 5XSSPE, 100-200 μg/ml denatured, heterologous DNA] for 1-3 hours at 65° C. A 50-100 μl volume of prehybridization solution/cm2 of filter is used. After prehybridization treatment, the ethidium labeled probe prepared as described in Part I-A above is added to the prehybridization solution and hybridization is allowed to occur (1-72 hours). The above are all standard techniques found in the literature [Maniatis et al (1982) "Molecular Cloning", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY].
After the hybridization, the filter is washed to remove excess probe DNA. The filter is then immersed into a solution containing β-galactosidase-labeled antibodies to the intercalator-DNA complex and incubated for 5 minutes to 12 hours. Excess antibody is removed by washing, and the amount of β-galactosidase associated with the filter is determined by adding a fluorogenic substrate of the enzymes (e.g., 4-methylumbelliferone β-galactoside) and measuring fluorescence intensity after a period of time. Because the quantity of enzyme present is likely to be quite low, the fluorogenic substrate is added in a concentration greater than or equal to its Michaelis constant (Km) for β-galactosidase. Standards, with a defined quantity of probe immobilized on the filter, can be run simultaneously so that hybridization can be quantitated.
This method is based on the sandwich hybridization assay described by Ranki et al for the detection of adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) DNA in clinical samples [Ranki et al (1983) Gene 21:77; Ranki et al (1983) Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology 104, Springer-Verlag, NY p. 307]. The solid phase probe pKTH1202 (see Part I-B above) is denatured, nicked and immobilized on nitrocellulose filters. After fixation (baking in vacuo at 80° C. for 2 hours), the filters are treated with a prehybridization solution for one hour at 65° C. DNA from clinical specimens and the intercalator-labeled solution hybridization probe mkTH1206 (prepared as described in Part I-B above) are added to the prehybridization solution and hybridization of the probes with the specimen DNA is allowed to occur for 1-72 hours. After hybridization, excess solution probe (mkTH1206) is removed by washing.
The extent of hybridization is quantitated using β-galactosidase-labeled antibody to the intercalator-DNA complex as outlined in Part II-A above.
This method is used for the detection of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in clinical urine specimens. The purified probe (EcoR1 O fragment of HCMV strain AD169, as described in Part I-C above) is denatured by heating at 90° C. for 10 minutes, rapidly chilled on ice (to prevent renaturation) and combined with an equal volume of 20XSSPE (3.6M NaCl, 0.2M NaPO4, 20 mM EDTA, pH 7.7). The single stranded probe DNA is then immobilized and fixed on a nitrocellulose membrane using standard procedures. The membrane is then treated with a prehybridization solution, preferably one not containing heterologous DNA. One prehybridization solution which can be used is that described by New England Nuclear for their Gene Screen Plus™ membranes; this solution is comprised of 1% SDS, 1M NaCl, and 10% dextran sulfate. To prevent nonspecific binding of the antibody in the final steps of the detection schemes, it may be desirable to include BSA in the prehybridization solution.
The clinical urine specimen to be tested is prepared in a manner similar to that described by Chou and Merigan [New Engl. J. Med. 308:921 (1983)]. After clarification of the sample and concentration of the HCMV phage particles by centrifugation, they are resuspended in a minimum volume of 0.5M NaOH and allowed to stand for 15 minutes. After neutralization with a minimum volume of 20XSSPE, the denatured clinical specimens are added to the filter in 1% SDS, 1M NaCl, 10% dextran sulfate and 100 μg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA. Hybridization is allowed to proceed at 65° C. for 1-72 hours; the filters are then washed in 2XSSPE.
The filters are immersed in a minimum volume of a solution containing the selected intercalator (e.g., ethidium bromide at a submillimolar concentration). Biotinylated antibody to the DNA-intercalator complex (Part I-J above) is then added and allowed to bind (1-24 hours). Excess antibody is removed by washing. In some situations it may be necessary to include the intercalating agent in these wash steps to keep the double-stranded DNA saturated.
A streptavidin-biotin-alkaline phosphatase complex (Part I-L above) is then added and allowed to bind to the biotinylated antibody associated with the DNA as described by Ward et al [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:4045(1983)]. After washing away excess alkaline phosphatase conjugates, the presence of conjugate associated with the filter is determined by adding a colorimetric substrate for alkaline phosphatase as described by Ward (ibid). This is a direct measure of the presence of HCMV DNA in the clinical urine specimen.
This method is similar to that of Part II-C above except that the probe is already labled with intercalating agent, and the final step of the detection scheme requires a second, isotopically labeled antibody.
The probe, ethidium labeled Eco RI fragment O of HCMV (prepared as described in Part I-D above) is denatured, immobilized and fixed on a nitrocellulose support as described for the method of Part II-C above. Viral DNA is isolated from urine samples, denatured, and hybridized to the immobilized probe also as described in Part II-C above, except that addition of free intercalator is unnecessary.
After washing the filter with the hybridized DNA, excess mouse monoclonal antibody to the intercalator-DNA complex (see Part I-G above) is added and allowed to bind to the hybridized DNA intercalator complex (30 minutes to 6 hours). Excess mouse antibody is removed by washing and excess radiolabeled rabbit-anti(mouse IgG) (Part I-K) is added. After a 30 minute to 6 hour incubation, excess antibody is again removed by washing. Hybridization is quantititated by autoradiography or gamma counting.
About 250 mg of salmon sperm DNA (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) is dissolved in 40 ml of 50 mM NaCl and sheared by five passages through a 23 gauge needle. The sheared DNA is placed in a 250 ml flask and diluted with an additional 160 ml of buffer. One hundred forty-five microliters (145 μl) of S1 -nuclease, 200,000 units per ml (Pharmacia P-L Biochemicals, Piscataway, NJ), is added and the mixture is incubated at 37° C. for 50 minutes.
Then the reaction mixture is extracted twice with phenol:chloroform, once with chloroform and the DNA is precipitated twice with ethanol [Maniatis et al (1982) "Molecular Cloning", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY]. The final precipitate is dissolved in 70 ml of 20 mM Tris hydrochloride buffer, pH 8.0.
This DNA is reacted wwith 8-azidoethidium under the following conditions. The reaction mixture is prepared with 33 ml of 2.7 mg DNA/ml, 13.5 ml of 4.95 mM 8-azidoethidium, 13.5 ml of 0.2M Tris-hydrochloride buffer, pH 8.0, 0.2M NaCl, and 76 ml water. The mixture is placed in a 250 ml beaker with a water jacket maintained at 22° C. The mixture is stirred and illuminated for 60 minutes by a 150 watt spotlight at a distance of 10 cm. This photolysis is repeated with an identical reaction mixture.
The photolyzed reaction mixtures are combined and extracted 10-times with an equal volume each time of n-butanol saturated with 20 mM Tris-hydrochloride buffer, pH 8.0, 0.2M NaCl. The extracted DNA solution is combined with 23 ml of 4.95 mM 8-azidoethidium and 77 ml of 20 mM Tris-hydrochloride buffer, pH 8.0, 0.2M NaCl. This solution is stirred in the water-jacketed beaker and photolyzed for 90 minutes. The reaction products are extracted 10 times with buffer saturated butanol as described above and the DNA is precipiated with ethanol. The precipitate is dissolved in 10 mM Tris-hydrochloride buffer, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA and the absorbances at 260 and 490 nm are recorded. Calculations made as described in Example 1A above indicate 1 ethidium residue is incorporated per 4.5 DNA base pairs.
One hundred milligrams of bovine thyroglobulin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis MO) is combined with 10 ml of anhydrous methanol and 400 μl of 2.55M HCl in methanol. This mixture is stirred on a rotary mixer at room temperature for 5 days. The precipitate is collected by centrifugation and washed twice with methanol and twice with ethanol. Then it is dried under vacuum overnight. About 82 mg of dry powder is obtained.
Fifty milligrams (55 mg) of methylated thyroglobulin is dissolved in 10 ml of water and 11.3 ml of a 2.2 mg/ml covalent ethidium DNA solution is added. A precipitate forms immediately and the suspension is diluted with 5.0 ml of 1.5M NaCl and 24.6 ml water.
Two milliliters (2 ml) of a mixture composed of 2.5 ml of the covalent ethidium-DNA methylated thyroglobulin complex, 2.5 ml of 0.15M saline and 5.0 ml of complete Freunds adjuvant is injected into four subcutaneous sites on a New Zealand white rabbit. Three weeks later a similar immunization with incomplete Freunds adjuvant is administered followed by additional immunizations at 4 week intervals. Fourteen weeks after the initial immunization, blood is collected for preparation of antiserum.
Antiserum to covalent ethidium-DNA is titered by an enzyme label immunosorbant assay. Polynucleotides are adsorbed onto the walls of polystyrene microtiter plates and then the rabbit antibody is allowed to bind. Finally the antibody is detected with peroxidase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG.
Fifty microliter (50 μl) aliquots of solutions containing 5 μg of polynucleotide per ml in 15 mM sodium citrate, pH 7.0, 0.15M NaCl is dispensed into wells of Immulon II microtiter plates (Dynatek, Alexandria, VA) and shaken gently at room temperature for 2 hours. Then the wells are emptied and washed with 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 0.15M NaCl, 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.5% Tween 20 (PBS/BSA/Tween).
Rabbit antiserum is diluted into 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.15M NaCl, 0.5% BSA and 50 μl aliquots are added to the wells and allowed to stand for 30 minutes. The wells are washed three times with PBS/BSA/Tween. Peroxidase covalently coupled to goat-antirabbit IgG (Cappel Laboratories, Cochranville, PA) is diluted 500-fold in 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, 0.15M NaCl, 0.5% BSA and 50 μl aliquots are added to each well. This solution is allowed to stand in the wells for 30 minutes at room temperature and then the wells are washed three times with PBS/BSA/Tween.
One hundred micromolar (100 μM) ethidium bromide is included in the diluted antiserum of wells containing noncovalent ethidium-DNA complex and the ethidium control wells. All wash solutions and reagents described above for processing these wells contain 100 μM ethidium.
A peroxidase substrate solution is prepared with:
20 mg o-phenylenediamine
5 ml 0.5M NaHPO4
12 ml 0.1M sodium citrate
13 ml water
20 μl 30% hydrogen peroxide
Seventy-five microliters (75 μl) of substrate solution is added per well and allowed to react for 10 minutes at room temperature. The reactions are quenched by addition of 50 μl of 2.5M sulfuric acid. Then the absorbances at 488 nm are recorded with a Artek Model 210 microliter plate photometer (Dynatek, Alexandria, VA).
Normal rabbit serum is used as a control and is processed as described for the rabbit antiserum.
The results are given in Table A and show that antibody in the control rabbit serum does not bind at significant levels to any of the coated or uncoated wells. It might have a weak antibody titer to single stranded DNA.
The antiserum to the covalent ethidium-DNA has very high titer to the covalent ethidium-DNA. Part of these antibodies are probably binding to ethidium residues that are coupled covalently to the phosphate ribose chain. This conclusion is based on the observation that the titers to the noncovalent ethidium-DNA complex are much lower (see Table A).
These results demonstrate that antibodies can be raised to the ethidium-DNA intercalation complex which do not crossreact significantly with native single or double stranded nucleic acid.
TABLE A__________________________________________________________________________Absorbances (488 nm) Buffer Covalent Double-strand Noncovalent Ethidium Single-strandDilution Control Ethidium-DNA DNA Ethidium-DNA Control DNA__________________________________________________________________________Antiserum 50 0.067 >1.2 0.126 0.825 0.049 0.283200 0.032 >1.2 0.068 0.597 0.021 0.184800 0.022 >1.2 0.067 0.30 0.016 0.174ControlSerum 50 0.038 0.053 0.091 0.031 0.023 0.245200 0.025 0.044 0.082 0.016 0.017 0.181800 0.017 0.034 0.054 0.015 0.016 0.190__________________________________________________________________________ Notes: (1) The buffer control does not contain DNA on the wells. (2) Doublestranded DNA contains calf thymus DNA on the wells. (3) Noncovalent ethidiumDNA has calf thymus doublestranded DNA on the wells and 100 μM ethidium in the reagent and wash solutions. (4) Ethidium control does not have DNA on the wells but has 100 μM ethidium in the reagent and wash solutions. (5) The singlestranded DNA has heat denatured calf thymus DNA coated on the wells.
The present invention has been particularly described and exemplified above. Obviously, many other variations and modifications of the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope hereof.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4257774 *||Jul 16, 1979||Mar 24, 1981||Meloy Laboratories, Inc.||Intercalation inhibition assay for compounds that interact with DNA or RNA|
|US4358535 *||Dec 8, 1980||Nov 9, 1982||Board Of Regents Of The University Of Washington||Specific DNA probes in diagnostic microbiology|
|US4423153 *||Dec 3, 1981||Dec 27, 1983||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Methods and compositions for the detection and determination of cellular DNA|
|US4493899 *||Oct 16, 1981||Jan 15, 1985||City Of Hope||Method of testing for particular antibodies in the serum of a patient|
|EP0063879A2 *||Apr 6, 1982||Nov 3, 1982||Yale University||Modified nucleotides and methods of preparing and using same|
|EP0070865A1 *||Feb 10, 1982||Feb 9, 1983||Kim Hindsgaul||Method and tool for an airtight sealing of two foils.|
|EP0070867A1 *||Feb 10, 1982||Feb 9, 1983||Dustcontrol Ab||Side-channel pump.|
|GB2019408A *||Title not available|
|WO1983001459A1 *||Sep 29, 1982||Apr 28, 1983||Ranki, Tuula, Marjut||A method and reagent combination for the diagnosis of microorganisms by sandwich hybridization of nucleic acids|
|WO1983002286A1 *||Dec 23, 1982||Jul 7, 1983||Tchen, Paul||Probe containing a modified nucleic acid recognizable by specific antibodies and utilization of said probe to test for and characterize an homologous dna sequence|
|1||*||Poirier et al, Proc. Nat l. Acad. Sci. USA, 79 (1981) 6443 7.|
|2||Poirier et al, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA, 79 (1981) 6443-7.|
|3||*||Rudkin et al, Nature, 265 (1977) 472.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4721668 *||Jul 25, 1984||Jan 26, 1988||Lifecodes Corporation||Pre-electrophoretic nucleic acid hybridization|
|US4724202 *||Dec 12, 1983||Feb 9, 1988||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Use of non-hybridizable nucleic acids for the detection of nucleic acid hybridization|
|US4725536 *||Sep 19, 1985||Feb 16, 1988||Genetics Institute, Inc.||Reagent polynucleotide complex with multiple target binding regions, and kit and methods|
|US4731325 *||Jan 24, 1985||Mar 15, 1988||Orion-Yhtyma||Arrays of alternating nucleic acid fragments for hybridization arrays|
|US4743535 *||Nov 7, 1984||May 10, 1988||Miles Inc.||Hybridization assay employing labeled probe and anti-hybrid|
|US4748115 *||Jan 8, 1986||May 31, 1988||Abbott Laboratories||Substrate formulation in 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol buffer for alkaline phosphatase assays|
|US4752566 *||Dec 17, 1985||Jun 21, 1988||Genetics Institute, Inc.||Displacement polynucleotide method and reagent complex employing labeled probe polynucleotide|
|US4775619 *||Oct 16, 1984||Oct 4, 1988||Chiron Corporation||Polynucleotide determination with selectable cleavage sites|
|US4777129 *||Oct 19, 1984||Oct 11, 1988||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Nucleic acid probe detectable by specific nucleic acid binding protein|
|US4794073 *||Jul 10, 1985||Dec 27, 1988||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acid hybrids by prolonged chemiluminescence|
|US4795700 *||Jan 25, 1985||Jan 3, 1989||California Institute Of Technology||Nucleic acid probes and methods of using same|
|US4806546 *||Sep 30, 1985||Feb 21, 1989||Miles Inc.||Immobilization of nucleic acids on derivatized nylon supports|
|US4806631 *||Sep 30, 1985||Feb 21, 1989||Miles Inc.||Immobilization of nucleic acids on solvolyzed nylon supports|
|US4818680 *||Dec 18, 1985||Apr 4, 1989||Mary Collins||Method and kit involving displacement and rehybridization of labeled polynucleotide|
|US4822731 *||Jan 9, 1986||Apr 18, 1989||Cetus Corporation||Process for labeling single-stranded nucleic acids and hybridizaiton probes|
|US4840892 *||Apr 15, 1985||Jun 20, 1989||Smithkline Beckman Corporation||Polynucleotide hybridization probes|
|US4840893 *||Dec 14, 1984||Jun 20, 1989||Medisense, Inc.||Electrochemical assay for nucleic acids and nucleic acid probes|
|US4842996 *||Aug 22, 1985||Jun 27, 1989||Institut Pasteur||Probes comprising modified adenine groups, their preparation and their uses|
|US4853327 *||Jul 10, 1985||Aug 1, 1989||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Enhanced phthalazinedione chemiluminescence|
|US4868103 *||Feb 19, 1986||Sep 19, 1989||Enzo Biochem, Inc.||Analyte detection by means of energy transfer|
|US4868104 *||Sep 6, 1985||Sep 19, 1989||Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.||Homogeneous assay for specific polynucleotides|
|US4868105 *||Dec 11, 1985||Sep 19, 1989||Chiron Corporation||Solution phase nucleic acid sandwich assay|
|US4876187 *||Dec 5, 1985||Oct 24, 1989||Meiogenics, Inc.||Nucleic acid compositions with scissile linkage useful for detecting nucleic acid sequences|
|US4894325 *||Jan 15, 1987||Jan 16, 1990||Enzo Biochem, Inc.||Hybridization method for the detection of genetic material|
|US4921788 *||Apr 12, 1988||May 1, 1990||The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York||Competitive nucleic acid immunoassay for the detection of analytes|
|US4921805 *||Sep 29, 1989||May 1, 1990||Life Technologies, Inc.||Nucleic acid capture method|
|US4925785 *||Mar 7, 1986||May 15, 1990||Biotechnica Diagnostics, Inc.||Nucleic acid hybridization assays|
|US4933276 *||Aug 4, 1987||Jun 12, 1990||Canberra Industries, Inc.||Use of oxidase enzyme systems in chemiluminescent assays|
|US4950588 *||Sep 27, 1988||Aug 21, 1990||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Prolonged enhanced chemiluminescence|
|US4959309 *||Oct 9, 1987||Sep 25, 1990||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Fast photochemical method of labelling nucleic acids for detection purposes in hybridization assays|
|US4968602 *||Nov 21, 1989||Nov 6, 1990||Molecular Diagnostics, Inc.||Solution-phase single hybridization assay for detecting polynucleotide sequences|
|US5089387 *||Jul 7, 1988||Feb 18, 1992||Adeza Biomedical Corporation||Dna probe diffraction assay and reagents|
|US5093232 *||Dec 23, 1986||Mar 3, 1992||Chiron Corporation||Nucleic acid probes|
|US5108893 *||Jun 11, 1990||Apr 28, 1992||Canberra Industries, Inc.||Use of oxidase enzyme systems in chemiluminescent assays|
|US5120504 *||Jul 12, 1989||Jun 9, 1992||Hybritech Incorporated||Apparatus for immunoassays with vent chennels in the container side wall|
|US5134066 *||Aug 29, 1989||Jul 28, 1992||Monsanto Company||Improved probes using nucleosides containing 3-dezauracil analogs|
|US5200313 *||Apr 25, 1988||Apr 6, 1993||Miles Inc.||Nucleic acid hybridization assay employing detectable anti-hybrid antibodies|
|US5204256 *||Jun 2, 1992||Apr 20, 1993||Behringwerke Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the purification of plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 (pai-2)|
|US5242797 *||Jan 2, 1992||Sep 7, 1993||Myron J. Block||Nucleic acid assay method|
|US5273882 *||Nov 20, 1991||Dec 28, 1993||Amgen||Method and kit for performing nucleic acid hybridization assays|
|US5348855 *||Oct 4, 1991||Sep 20, 1994||Miles Inc.||Assay for nucleic acid sequences in an unpurified sample|
|US5359053 *||May 6, 1992||Oct 25, 1994||G. D. Searle & Co.||Modified deazapyrimidines|
|US5384241 *||Nov 29, 1989||Jan 24, 1995||Enzo Diagnostics, Inc.||Specific binding assay compound with inhibitive self-quenching characteristics|
|US5430136 *||Jul 27, 1990||Jul 4, 1995||Chiron Corporation||Oligonucleotides having selectably cleavable and/or abasic sites|
|US5474911 *||Nov 30, 1990||Dec 12, 1995||The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Jr. University||Promotion of high specificity molecular assembly|
|US5476769 *||Nov 7, 1990||Dec 19, 1995||Orion-Yahtyma Oy||Method for assays of nucleic acid, a reagent combination and a kit therefor|
|US5494797 *||Jul 8, 1994||Feb 27, 1996||Mccann Associates, Inc.||Method for detecting lyme disease|
|US5519126 *||Nov 22, 1993||May 21, 1996||University Of Virginia Alumni Patents Foundation||Oligonucleotide N-alkylphosphoramidates|
|US5545730 *||May 8, 1995||Aug 13, 1996||Chiron Corporation||Multifunctional nucleic acid monomer|
|US5552538 *||May 9, 1995||Sep 3, 1996||Chiron Corporation||Oligonucleotides with cleavable sites|
|US5556961 *||Oct 24, 1994||Sep 17, 1996||Foote; Robert S.||Nucleosides with 5'-O-photolabile protecting groups|
|US5578717 *||May 8, 1995||Nov 26, 1996||Chiron Corporation||Nucleotides for introducing selectably cleavable and/or abasic sites into oligonucleotides|
|US5747254 *||Aug 23, 1995||May 5, 1998||The Board Of Trustees Of Leland Stanford Jr. University||Promotion of high specificity molecular assembly|
|US5753787 *||Apr 10, 1995||May 19, 1998||Yale University||Nucleic acids encoding ancylostoma secreted protein|
|US5789155 *||Nov 12, 1993||Aug 4, 1998||California Institute Of Technology||Process for identifying nucleic acids and triple helices formed thereby|
|US5792617 *||Jun 7, 1995||Aug 11, 1998||Rotman; M. Boris||Cell proliferation-based amplified detection of analytes|
|US5795722 *||Mar 18, 1997||Aug 18, 1998||Visible Genetics Inc.||Method and kit for quantitation and nucleic acid sequencing of nucleic acid analytes in a sample|
|US5843666 *||Nov 15, 1996||Dec 1, 1998||Lumigen, Inc.||Chemiluminescent detection methods using dual enzyer-labeled binding partners|
|US5874555 *||Nov 22, 1993||Feb 23, 1999||California Institute Of Technology||Triple helices and processes for making same|
|US5879881 *||Dec 7, 1993||Mar 9, 1999||Hybritech, Incorporated||Solid phase system for use in ligand-receptor assays|
|US5994079 *||Feb 6, 1998||Nov 30, 1999||Digene Corporation||Direct detection of RNA mediated by reverse transcriptase lacking RNAse H function|
|US5998135 *||Jun 7, 1995||Dec 7, 1999||Enzo Diagnostics, Inc.||Energy transfer hybridization assay using intercalators and lanthanide metals|
|US6007983 *||Sep 26, 1997||Dec 28, 1999||Visible Genetics Inc.||Method and kit for evaluation of HIV mutations|
|US6020131 *||Nov 7, 1997||Feb 1, 2000||Research Development Corporation Of Japan||Nucleic acid polymer/intercalator monolayer and methods of using and making thereof|
|US6080585 *||Feb 1, 1995||Jun 27, 2000||Oxford Gene Technology Limited||Methods for discovering ligands|
|US6225053||Dec 12, 1997||May 1, 2001||Digene Corporation||Detection of hepatitis B virus|
|US6228578||Jan 18, 1994||May 8, 2001||Digene Corporation||Non-radioactive hybridization assay and kit|
|US6239271||Aug 31, 1999||May 29, 2001||Enzo Diagnostics, Inc.||Energy transfer hybridization assay composition|
|US6265152||Oct 15, 1999||Jul 24, 2001||Visible Genetics Inc.||Method and kit for evaluation of HIV mutations|
|US6277579||Nov 15, 1999||Aug 21, 2001||Digene Corporation||Direct detection of RNA mediated by reverse transcriptase lacking RNAse H function|
|US6277592||Jul 31, 1996||Aug 21, 2001||Purina Mills, Inc.||Porcine leptin protein, nucleic acid sequences coding therefor and uses thereof|
|US6297027||Jul 31, 1996||Oct 2, 2001||Purina Mills, Inc.||Bovine leptin protein, nucleic acid sequences coding therefor and uses thereof|
|US6326136 *||Dec 23, 1994||Dec 4, 2001||Digene Corporation||Macromolecular conjugate made using unsaturated aldehydes|
|US6403302||Dec 16, 1993||Jun 11, 2002||California Institute Of Technology||Methods and compositions for triple helix formation|
|US6432638||Aug 4, 1998||Aug 13, 2002||California Institute Of Technology||Triple helix recognition of DNA|
|US6566068||Mar 23, 2001||May 20, 2003||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Process for detecting a nucleic acid of interest using an oligo- or polynucleotide probe and intercalators|
|US6653107||Mar 27, 2001||Nov 25, 2003||Visible Genetics Inc.||Method and kit for evaluation of HIV mutations|
|US6814934||Nov 12, 1997||Nov 9, 2004||Russell Gene Higuchi||Instrument for monitoring nucleic acid amplification|
|US6830887||Feb 25, 2002||Dec 14, 2004||Bayer Healthcare Llc||Method and kit for quantitation and nucleic acid sequencing of nucleic acid analytes in a sample|
|US6830902||Jun 30, 2000||Dec 14, 2004||Invitrogen Corporation||Compositions and methods for enhanced sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid synthesis|
|US6878515 *||Jun 14, 1996||Apr 12, 2005||Ulf Landegren||Ultrasensitive immunoassays|
|US6919211||Sep 1, 2000||Jul 19, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Polypeptide arrays|
|US6972329||Nov 13, 2002||Dec 6, 2005||Whatman, Inc.||Materials and methods for releasing genetic material|
|US7087732||Dec 28, 2001||Aug 8, 2006||Affymetrix, Inc.||Nucleotides and analogs having photoremovable protecting groups|
|US7138268||Jun 29, 2001||Nov 21, 2006||Agilent Technologies, Inc.||Dry biochemical assay plate and method for making the same|
|US7282361 *||Mar 8, 2005||Oct 16, 2007||Transnetyx, Inc.||Systems and methods for transgenic and targeted mutagenesis screening|
|US7329496||Jan 5, 2006||Feb 12, 2008||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequencing of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microflourescence detection|
|US7387887 *||Apr 20, 2004||Jun 17, 2008||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Nucleic acid melting analysis with saturation dyes|
|US7399589||Dec 11, 2003||Jul 15, 2008||Digene Corporation||Immunological detection of RNA:DNA hybrids on microarrays|
|US7459275||Jun 2, 2006||Dec 2, 2008||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequencing of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microfluorescence detection|
|US7537886||Jun 22, 2000||May 26, 2009||Life Technologies Corporation||Primers and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US7713528||Jun 7, 1995||May 11, 2010||Enzo Therapeutics, Inc.||Method for in vivo delivery of active compounds using reagent conjugate|
|US7829691||Nov 9, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by type specific hybrid capture method|
|US7879546||Feb 1, 2011||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Assessment of human papilloma virus-related disease|
|US7993853||Aug 9, 2011||Gen-Probe Incorporated||Methods of nucleic acid target capture|
|US8043816||Oct 25, 2011||Life Technologies Corporation||Compositions and methods for temperature-dependent nucleic acid synthesis|
|US8288520||Oct 16, 2012||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Fast results hybrid capture assay and system|
|US8389219||Nov 19, 2009||Mar 5, 2013||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by type-specific hybrid capture method|
|US8394609||Dec 1, 2009||Mar 12, 2013||Life Technologies Corporation||Primers and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US8557973||Oct 14, 2010||Oct 15, 2013||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by target-specific hybrid capture method|
|US8669052||Jul 14, 2009||Mar 11, 2014||Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.||Lateral flow nucleic acid detector|
|US8735564||Sep 14, 2012||May 27, 2014||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Fast results hybrid capture assay and system|
|US8815241||Aug 8, 2011||Aug 26, 2014||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Use of combination of anti-angiogenic substance and c-kit kinase inhibitor|
|US8822151||Jun 25, 2012||Sep 2, 2014||Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.||Lateral flow nucleic acid detector|
|US8847006||Mar 27, 2008||Sep 30, 2014||Monsanto Technology Llc||Utility of SNP markers associated with major soybean plant maturity and growth habit genomic regions|
|US8865737||Aug 27, 2007||Oct 21, 2014||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Antitumor agent for undifferentiated gastric cancer|
|US8877436||Oct 26, 2009||Nov 4, 2014||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Fast results hybrid capture assay on an automated platform|
|US8901287||Oct 9, 2009||Dec 2, 2014||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by target-specific hybrid capture method|
|US8952035||Nov 7, 2008||Feb 10, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Combination of anti-angiogenic substance and anti-tumor platinum complex|
|US8962650||Apr 16, 2012||Feb 24, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Therapeutic agent for tumor|
|US8962655||Jan 28, 2008||Feb 24, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Composition for treatment of undifferentiated gastric cancer|
|US8969344||Sep 21, 2012||Mar 3, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Method for assay on the effect of vascularization inhibitor|
|US8969379||Sep 14, 2005||Mar 3, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Pharmaceutical compositions of 4-(3-chloro-4-(cyclopropylaminocarbonyl)aminophenoxy)-7=methoxy-6-quinolinecarboxide|
|US9006240||Aug 2, 2006||Apr 14, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Method for assay on the effect of vascularization inhibitor|
|US9006256||Apr 8, 2011||Apr 14, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Antitumor agent for thyroid cancer|
|US9012458||Jun 23, 2011||Apr 21, 2015||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Antitumor agent using compounds having kinase inhibitory effect in combination|
|US9057100||Jul 29, 2004||Jun 16, 2015||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Composition comprising array of nucleic acid primer sets|
|US9115410||Mar 15, 2013||Aug 25, 2015||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by target-specific hybrid capture method|
|US9121849||Mar 8, 2013||Sep 1, 2015||Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.||Lateral flow assays|
|US9163280||Jul 29, 2004||Oct 20, 2015||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Process for detecting or quantifying nucleic acids in a library|
|US9234234||Jul 27, 2004||Jan 12, 2016||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Detection and quantification process for more than one nucleic acid in library|
|US9234235||Jul 29, 2004||Jan 12, 2016||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Processes for detecting or quantifying nucleic acids using an array of fixed or immobilized nucleic acids|
|US9279147||Jul 29, 2004||Mar 8, 2016||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Processes for detecting or quantifying analytes of interest|
|US9290663||Mar 8, 2012||Mar 22, 2016||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Amplicon melting analysis with saturation dyes|
|US9309563||Jul 27, 2004||Apr 12, 2016||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.||Compositions and processes for analyte detection, quantification and amplification|
|US20010046682 *||Jun 29, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Kay Lichtenwalter||Dry biochemical assay plate and method for making the same|
|US20020137096 *||Dec 14, 2001||Sep 26, 2002||Affymetrix, Inc.||Apparatus comprising polymers|
|US20020155491 *||Apr 19, 2002||Oct 24, 2002||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20020155492 *||Apr 19, 2002||Oct 24, 2002||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20020192684 *||Mar 22, 2002||Dec 19, 2002||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20030003475 *||Mar 22, 2002||Jan 2, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20030017484 *||Apr 19, 2002||Jan 23, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20030104411 *||Mar 18, 2002||Jun 5, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20030119008 *||Dec 28, 2001||Jun 26, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Nucleotides and analogs having photoremovable protecting groups|
|US20030119011 *||Mar 18, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20030165859 *||Dec 27, 2001||Sep 4, 2003||Invitrogen Corporation||Primers and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US20030235853 *||May 2, 2003||Dec 25, 2003||Affymetrix, Inc.||Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis|
|US20040067521 *||Oct 28, 2003||Apr 8, 2004||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20040091939 *||Mar 28, 2002||May 13, 2004||To Cheung||Device and method for detection of multiple analytes|
|US20040180345 *||Mar 14, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Ingeneus Corporation||Pre-incubation method to improve signal/noise ratio of nucleic acid assays|
|US20040180362 *||Dec 11, 2003||Sep 16, 2004||Lazar James G.||Immunological detection of RNA:DNA hybrids on microarrays|
|US20040234994 *||Nov 13, 2002||Nov 25, 2004||Burgoyne Leigh Alexander||Materials and methods for releasing genetic material|
|US20050009014 *||Mar 22, 2002||Jan 13, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20050042666 *||Sep 2, 2004||Feb 24, 2005||Irina Nazarenko||Primers and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US20050053928 *||Apr 19, 2002||Mar 10, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20050079529 *||Aug 27, 2004||Apr 14, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis|
|US20050118706 *||Nov 23, 2004||Jun 2, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Polymer arrays|
|US20050148002 *||Nov 23, 2004||Jul 7, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequence of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microfluorescence detection|
|US20050148027 *||Nov 23, 2004||Jul 7, 2005||Affymetrix Inc.||Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis|
|US20050153362 *||Nov 23, 2004||Jul 14, 2005||Pirrung Michael C.||Polymer arrays|
|US20050153363 *||Nov 23, 2004||Jul 14, 2005||Pirrung Michael C.||Polymer arrays|
|US20050153913 *||Jun 28, 2004||Jul 14, 2005||Kosak Kenneth M.||Nucleic acid carrier compositions and methods for their synthesis|
|US20050170340 *||Mar 22, 2002||Aug 4, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Arrays for detecting nucleic acids|
|US20050170423 *||Mar 8, 2005||Aug 4, 2005||Hodge Timothy A.||Systems and methods for transgenic and targeted mutagenesis screening|
|US20050208537 *||Dec 16, 2004||Sep 22, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis|
|US20050214828 *||Jan 21, 2005||Sep 29, 2005||Affymetrix, Inc.||Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis|
|US20050221370 *||May 17, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Hodge Timothy A||Systems and methods for ordering, performing, and reporting genetic screening|
|US20050233335 *||Apr 20, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||University Of Utah Research Foundation||Nucleic and melting analysis with saturation dyes|
|US20050233343 *||Jul 27, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||Enzo Life Sciences Inc.,||Composition of matter comprising library of analytes hybridized to nucleic acid array for generating complex formation and signaling domains|
|US20050233351 *||Dec 15, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||Ulf Landegren||Ultrasensitive immunoassays|
|US20060099601 *||Jul 27, 2004||May 11, 2006||Enzo Life Sciences, Inc.,||Novel compositions and processes for analyte detection, quantification and amplification|
|US20060105348 *||Nov 15, 2004||May 18, 2006||Lee Jun E||Compositions and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US20060172327 *||Jan 5, 2006||Aug 3, 2006||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequencing of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microflourescence detection|
|US20060275792 *||Feb 28, 2006||Dec 7, 2006||Lee Jun E||Enhancement of nucleic acid amplification using double-stranded DNA binding proteins|
|US20070105131 *||Jun 2, 2006||May 10, 2007||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequencing of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microfluorescence detection|
|US20070154884 *||Mar 2, 2007||Jul 5, 2007||Lorincz Attila T||Assessment of human papilloma virus-related disease|
|US20070196853 *||Apr 25, 2007||Aug 23, 2007||Transnetyx, Inc.||Methods For Rapid Genotype Screening|
|US20080027217 *||Apr 25, 2007||Jan 31, 2008||Transnetyx, Inc.||Method to Obtain Purified Human Genomic Nucleic Acid|
|US20080214557 *||Feb 28, 2008||Sep 4, 2008||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Method for preparation of pharmaceutical composition having improved disintegratability and pharmaceutical composition manufactured by same method|
|US20080214604 *||Sep 14, 2005||Sep 4, 2008||Hisao Furitsu||Medicinal Composition|
|US20080256660 *||Mar 27, 2008||Oct 16, 2008||Jonathan Jenkinson||Utility of SNP markers associated with major soybean plant maturity and growth habit genomic regions|
|US20080286807 *||Nov 20, 2006||Nov 20, 2008||Oregon Health & Science University||Methods and Reagents for Elimination or Reduction of False Positives in the Analysis of a Sample|
|US20090137419 *||Dec 1, 2008||May 28, 2009||Affymetrix, Inc.||Sequencing of surface immobilized polymers utilizing microfluorescence detection|
|US20090162851 *||Oct 19, 2008||Jun 25, 2009||Digene Corporation||Detection of nucleic acids by type specific hybrid capture method|
|US20090264464 *||Aug 27, 2007||Oct 22, 2009||Eisai R & D Management Co., Ltd.||Antitumor agent for undifferentiated gastric cancer|
|US20090298187 *||Dec 3, 2009||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Compositions, methods, and kits using synthetic probes for determining the presence of a target nucleic acid|
|US20090305290 *||Dec 10, 2009||Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.||Lateral flow nucleic acid detector|
|US20100036104 *||Oct 9, 2009||Feb 11, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by target-specific hybrid capture method|
|US20100048620 *||Jan 28, 2008||Feb 25, 2010||Yuji Yamamoto||Composition for treatment of undifferentiated gastric cancer|
|US20100092490 *||Aug 2, 2006||Apr 15, 2010||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Method for assay on the effect of vascularization inhibitor|
|US20100105060 *||Oct 26, 2009||Apr 29, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Fast results hybrid capture assay on an automated platform|
|US20100159463 *||Oct 26, 2009||Jun 24, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Fast results hybrid capture assay and system|
|US20100216147 *||Jan 27, 2010||Aug 26, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg, Inc.||Sequence-specific large volume sample preparation method and assay|
|US20100233699 *||Dec 1, 2009||Sep 16, 2010||Life Technologies Corporation||Primers and methods for the detection and discrimination of nucleic acids|
|US20100239688 *||Nov 7, 2008||Sep 23, 2010||Yuji Yamamoto||Combination of anti-angiogenic substance and anti-tumor platinum complex|
|US20100299773 *||May 12, 2010||Nov 25, 2010||Monsanto Technology Llc||Methods and compositions for selecting an improved plant|
|US20100311039 *||Apr 30, 2010||Dec 9, 2010||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Non-target amplification method for detection of rna splice-forms in a sample|
|US20110003288 *||Nov 19, 2009||Jan 6, 2011||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Detection of nucleic acids by type-specific hybrid capture method|
|US20110086359 *||Dec 1, 2010||Apr 14, 2011||Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.||Lateral flow assays|
|US20110091873 *||Oct 21, 2009||Apr 21, 2011||Microfluidic Systems, Inc.||Integrated sample preparation and amplification for nucleic acid detection from biological samples|
|US20110097708 *||Dec 22, 2010||Apr 28, 2011||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Assessment of human papilloma virus-related disease|
|US20110160289 *||May 3, 2010||Jun 30, 2011||Life Technologies Corporation||Compositions and methods for enhanced sensitivity and specificity of nucleic acid synthesis|
|US20110207756 *||Aug 25, 2011||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Antitumor agent for thyroid cancer|
|US20110217705 *||Sep 8, 2011||Qiagen Gaithersburg Inc.||Methods and compositions for sequence-specific purification and multiplex analysis of nucleic acids|
|USRE37891||Mar 8, 2000||Oct 22, 2002||Vysis, Inc.||Target and background capture methods with amplification for affinity assays|
|CN101198706B||Apr 20, 2005||Oct 26, 2011||爱达荷州技术股份有限公司||Nucleic and melting analysis with saturation dyes|
|EP1950305A1||May 3, 2002||Jul 30, 2008||Monsanto Technology, LLC||Tyr a genes and uses thereof|
|EP2455489A2||May 24, 2007||May 23, 2012||Monsanto Technology LLC||A method to identify disease resistant quantitative trait loci in soybean and compositions thereof|
|EP2455490A2||May 24, 2007||May 23, 2012||Monsanto Technology LLC||A method to identify disease resistant quantitative trait loci in soybean and compositions thereof|
|EP2455491A2||May 24, 2007||May 23, 2012||Monsanto Technology LLC||A method to identify disease resistant quantitative trait loci in soybean and compositions thereof|
|EP2476763A2||Aug 29, 2008||Jul 18, 2012||Monsanto Technology LLC||Methods and compositions for breeding for preferred traits|
|EP2617837A2||Jun 6, 2008||Jul 24, 2013||Biogen Idec MA Inc.||Biomarkers for predicting anti-TNF responsiveness or non-responsiveness|
|WO1986007387A1 *||Jun 13, 1986||Dec 18, 1986||Amgen||Method and kit for performing nucleic acid hybridization assays|
|WO1987003911A1 *||Dec 17, 1986||Jul 2, 1987||Genetics Institute, Inc.||Displacement polynucleotide method and reagent complex|
|WO1988010313A1 *||Jun 22, 1988||Dec 29, 1988||E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Affinity removal of contaminating sequences from recombinant cloned na using capture beads|
|WO1989009221A1 *||Mar 22, 1989||Oct 5, 1989||University Of Virginia Alumni Patents Foundation||Oligonucleotide n-alkylphosphoramidates|
|WO1989010413A1 *||Apr 20, 1989||Nov 2, 1989||The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of||Replicatable hybridizable recombinant rna probes and methods of using same|
|WO1991006665A1 *||Oct 26, 1990||May 16, 1991||Isaacs Stephen T||Activation compounds and methods for nucleic acid sterilization|
|WO1991008480A1 *||Nov 30, 1990||Jun 13, 1991||The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University||Promotion of high specificity molecular assembly|
|WO1993010266A1 *||Nov 20, 1992||May 27, 1993||The United States Of America, Represented By The Secretary, United States Department Of Commerce||Device and method for detection of compounds which intercalate with nucleic acids|
|WO2002090506A2||May 9, 2002||Nov 14, 2002||Monsanto Technology Llc||Metabolite transporters|
|WO2003044211A2 *||Nov 13, 2002||May 30, 2003||Whatman Inc.||Materials and methods for releasing genetic material|
|WO2003044211A3 *||Nov 13, 2002||Mar 4, 2004||Leigh A Burgoyne||Materials and methods for releasing genetic material|
|WO2006121423A3 *||Apr 20, 2005||Nov 22, 2007||Univ Utah Res Found||Nucleic acid melting analysis with saturation dyes|
|WO2008121291A1||Mar 27, 2008||Oct 9, 2008||Monsanto Technology Llc||Utility of snp markers associated with major soybean plant maturity and growth habit genomic regions|
|WO2009132089A2||Apr 22, 2009||Oct 29, 2009||Monsanto Technology Llc||A method to identify asian soybean rust resistance quantitative trait loci in soybean and compositions thereof|
|WO2014185540A1||May 12, 2014||Nov 20, 2014||Eisai R&D Management Co., Ltd.||Biomarkers for predicting and assessing responsiveness of endometrial cancer subjects to lenvatinib compounds|
|U.S. Classification||435/6.12, 435/966, 435/7.5, 536/24.3, 436/504, 435/7.9, 536/25.32, 435/975|
|International Classification||C07K16/18, C12Q1/70, C12Q1/68|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S435/966, Y10S435/975, C07K16/18, C12Q1/6816, C12Q1/705, C12Q1/6804|
|European Classification||C07K16/18, C12Q1/70B4, C12Q1/68B2, C12Q1/68A2|
|Dec 24, 1984||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MILES LABORATORIES, INC., ELKHART, IN A CORP OF DE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:ALBARELLA, JAMES P.;ANDERSON, LESLIE H.;REEL/FRAME:004352/0359;SIGNING DATES FROM 19841128 TO 19841219
|May 25, 1989||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 23, 1993||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Jul 23, 1993||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jul 3, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12