|Publication number||US4607488 A|
|Application number||US 06/738,384|
|Publication date||Aug 26, 1986|
|Filing date||May 28, 1985|
|Priority date||Jun 1, 1984|
|Also published as||CA1269853A, CA1269853A1, DE3564714D1, EP0163579A1, EP0163579B1|
|Publication number||06738384, 738384, US 4607488 A, US 4607488A, US-A-4607488, US4607488 A, US4607488A|
|Inventors||Pierre Karinthi, Maurice Gardent, Colette Regnier, Jean Tuccella|
|Original Assignee||L'air Liquide, Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (49), Classifications (8), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to the technique of congelation of grounds. It concerns first of all a process for the congelation of ground of the type in which a refrigerant liquid is cooled by the exchange of heat with a cryogenic fluid and then this liquid is made to flow in a series of probes driven into the ground.
It is known that the consolidation of grounds by congelation permits the opening up of public works sites in damp and unstable grounds. It is carried out by the injection of a refrigerant fluid into probes inserted in different places in the ground. This cooling congeals the ground progressively until a continuous wall is formed when the congelation regions of each probe have joined up with neighbouring regions.
It is known to inject into the probes either a cooled liquid or a cryogenic liquid such as liquid nitrogen.
The direct injection of liquid nitrogen presents several drawbacks, and in particular the difficulty of controlling the coefficients of thermal exchange with the ground: in giving up cold the nitrogen is vaporized and the coefficients of exchange between the probe and the pure liquid nitrogen first of all, then the mixtures of liquid and gas in a variable proportion, and then the cold gas alone, are very different. There is consequently a high heterogeneity in the thickness of the congealed ground around the probe and a loss of time and energy in allowing the least congealed regions to join up to form the consolidated wall, while the most congealed regions are unnecessarily super-cooled and over-sized.
The injection of a cooled liquid does not have these drawbacks, but its efficiency depends on the cooling method.
The cooling of a liquid flowing through a refrigerating unit permits the injection of the liquid at -40° C. in best cases and more usually at -20° C. or -30° C. These congelation conditions result in a prohibitive period for forming the wall, namely on the order of several weeks in respect of a wall having a thickness of 1 m.
This period is usually incompatible with the duration of the sites in towns.
In order to be able to circulate in the probes a liquid at a much lower temperature, for example -80° C. or even -120° C., congelation processes of the aforementioned type have also been proposed.
Such a process permits the solving of the aforementioned drawbacks but at the present time remains costly for the following reasons: on one hand, in order to accelerate the congelation, it is necessary to cool the ground more than is strictly necessary for its consolidation. On the other hand, the ground is always hetergeneous and the consolidation of the congealed wall is governed by the weakest point, i.e. where the congelation advances at the slowest rate. It is then necessary to extend, sometimes in considerable proportions, the most rapidly congealed regions.
An object of dimension is to considerably reduce the excess of cold and consequently to render the process much more economical without substantially increasing the duration of the congelation.
The invention consequently provides a process for the congelation of the ground of the aforementioned type, wherein the temperature of the refrigerant liquid is varied, in the course of the ground congelation stage, as a function of the progression of the congelation.
In a first manner of carrying out the invention, the temperature of the liquid flowing in at least one of the probes is progressively increased, preferably in successive stages.
In a second manner of carrying out the invention, which may be combined with the first, the temperature of the liquid flowing in each probe is adapted to the rate of congelation of the ground around this probe, this temperature being regulated to a value which is the higher as the rate of congelation is higher.
Another object of invention is to provide an installation for the congelation of the ground adapted to carry out said process. This installation, of the type comprising a heat exchanger supplied with, n the one hand, cryogenic fluid and, on the other hand, a refrigerant liquid, a series of congelation probes, and means for circulating the liquid in each probe, is characterized in that it comprises means for varying the set temperature of the heat exchanger, and/or that it comprises at least two independent heat exchangers having different set temperatures.
A few examples of carrying out the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a first manner of carrying out the invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the advantage afforded by the process illustrated in FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a diagram of an installation corresponding to a second manner of carrying out the invention, and
FIG. 4 illustrates diagrammatically a modification.
In each of the following embodiments, the invention concerns the formation in a sandy and damp ground of a congealed wall in the shelter of which certain works can be carried out. For this purpose, there are driven into the ground a series of congelation probes S1, S2 . . . , diagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 3 and there is circulated in each of the probes a refrigerant liquid having a given inlet temperature. The chosen liquid must have a sufficiently low congelation point, and methanol is a suitable liquid to which reference will be made hereinafter.
As shown in FIG. 3 this liquid flows in a closed circuit between the probe and heat exchanger E1, E2, . . . , termed a "cold station" which comprises, on one hand, passages for this liquid and, on the other hand, passages for a cryogenic fluid, in particular liquid nitrogen. The rate of supply of liquid nitrogen to these last-mentioned passages is controlled by a valve 1 controlled by a temperature sensor 2 which detects the temperature of the refrigerant liquid issuing from the exchanger. The nitrogen passages may for example, as illustrated in FIG. 3, be formed by a heat exchanger 3 through which extends a coiled tube 4 for the circulation of the refrigerant liquid in countercurrent manner with respect to the nitrogen. These elements have been shown in FIG. 3 only for the exchanger E1 in order to render the drawings more clear, but it will be understood that if the installation has a plurality of exchangers, as that shown in FIG. 3, all these exchangers have a similar construction.
Refrigerant liquid issuing at a set cold temperature from an exchanger is injected at the bottom of each probe, connected to the latter, through a central tube 5 of the probe and rises between the tube and the cylindrical case 6 of the probe and returns to the exchanger. Between the probe inlet and outlet, the liquid exchanges heat with the surrounding ground through the case 6.
In the manner of carrying out the invention illustrated in FIG. 1, the temperature of the refrigerant liquid injected into the congelation probes is modified with respect to time by progressively increasing this temperature from a minimum temperature of the start of the congelation to a final temperature for maintaining the already-congealed wall cold. In the illustrated example, this increase occurs in successive stages.
As a numerical example, it will be assumed that it is desired to consolidate by congelation within 100 hours a wall having a thickness of 1 meter in a damp and sandy ground, to a depth of 20 meters and to a length of 50 meters. For this purpose, fifty probes S1, S2, . . . , S50 spaced apart 1 meter from one another are driven into the ground. Methanol is circulated between the probes, connected in parallel, and a single heat exchanger cooled by liquid nitrogen, such as the exchanger E1 described hereinbefore. The temperature sensor 2 is provided with a regulating device for the purpose of regulating as desired the temperature of the methanol between -80° C. (which is the lower limit allowed for this body) and -10° C.
The congelation is started by circulating the methanol with a set temperature at the outlet of the exchanger (and therefore at the injection into the probes) of -80° C. This set temperature is maintained for 50 hours. The temperature of the ground in the vicinity of the probes is then established at -70° C. and the congealed radius around the probes is 38 cm (namely a diameter of 76 cm).
At this moment, the set temperature of the methanol is regulated to -65° C. This temperature is maintained for 20 hours. The temperature of the ground in the vicinity of the probes is established at -57° C. During this period of time, the progression of the front of the congelation of the wall has practically not slowed down, since it is governed by the temperature gradient in the vicinity of the congelation isotherm (0° C.) and not by the temperature of the probe. There is thus obtained at the end of 70 hours of congelation a congealed diameter of 84 cm.
After 70 hours of congelation, the set temperature of the methanol is fixed at -50° C. This set temperature is maintained for 15 hours. Temperature of the ground in the vicinity of the probes is established at -44° C. At the end of 85 hours, the congealed diameter around the probes is 88 cm.
The temperature of methanol is then set at -40° C. It is maintained for 10 hours. The temperature of the ground in the vicinity of the probes is established at -35° C. At the end of 95 hours of congelation, the diameter of the congealed ground around the probes is 90 cm.
The set temperature of the methanol is then established at -35° C. This set temperature will be maintained for the whole of the period of maintenance of the congealed wall. The temperature of the ground around the probes will reach an equilibrium at -30° C. A congelation having a diameter of 100 cm will be obtained at the end of about 100 hours.
Note that the foregoing indications correspond to a homogeneous ground and to an isolated probe; in fact, each congelation probe reacts with its neighbouring probes which results, for a spacing of 1 meter between the probes, in a congealed wall having a variable thickness: 1 meter in the region of the probes, and about 80 cm half-way between the probes.
It will moreover be understood that, by way of a modification, the different set temperatures of the methanol may be obtained not by means of a single exchanger having an adjustable set temperature, but by means of a plurality of heat exchangers having different but fixed set temperatures, it being possible to selectively connect these exchangers to the probes through an appropriate set of valves. Further, if the available exchangers do not permit providing individually the required refrigerating power (proportional to the product of the rate of flow of methanol by the temperature difference between the inlet and the outlet of the exchanger), there may be used for each set temperature a plurality of exchangers connected in parallel and set to the same temperature.
FIG. 2 illustrates the advantage of the process described hereinbefore. It represents the variation of the temperature T of the ground as a function of the radius R measured from the outer wall of a probe assumed to be isolated, at the end of the congelation, i.e. when the congealed radius Rc becomes in the neighbourhood of the semi-distance between the probes (about 0.5 m in the foregoing example).
The lower curve A1 corresponds to the case where the probe would have been permanently supplied with methanol at -80° C. in accordance with the prior art. This curve rises from -70° C. for R=0 to 0° C. for R=Rc, then from 0° C. to the ambient temperature Ta. The upper curve A2 corresponds to the method according to the invention described hereinbefore; it rises from -30° C. for R=0 to 0° C. for R=Rc, then continues to rise from 0° C. to Ta while remaining above the curve A1. The crosshatched area between the two curves A1 and A2 represents the economy of negative calories achieved.
In the embodiment shown in FIG. 3, the temperature of the methanol is regulated not with respect to time but with respect to space by adapting this temperature for each probe to the rate of congelation of the ground around this probe so as to avoid excessively supercooling the parts of the ground which congeal the quickest. Indeed, in actual fact, if a ground is generally relatively homogeneous within the radius of 50 to 60 cm around a probe, this is not true from one probe to another.
For this purpose, a plurality of heat exchangers E1, E2, . . . , namely, five exchangers in the illustrated embodiment, are used, these exchangers having set temperatures which are independently adjustable and each being capable of connection to all of the probes. The rate of cooling of the ground is measured at the start of the congelation and methanol is sent into each probe at a temperature which is all the less cold as the ground concerned by this probe is cooled more rapidly.
The congelation rate which will enable a set temperature to be fixed for each probe and each heat exchanger can be determined for example in the following manner.
There may first of all be effected overall measurements of the cooling for each probe:
(a) The measurement of the difference of temperature between the inlet and the outlet of the methanol in each probe is a measurement which is characteristic of the heat flux absorbed by the ground for a given rate of flow. If this temperature is higher for a particular probe, the temperature of injection of the methanol into this probe must be raised, since the ground absorbs much cold.
(b) There may also be disposed parallel to the line of probes a line of temperature sensors C1, C2 , . . . , for example as shown in FIG. 4 where a temperature sensor is disposed in the ground close to the surface between the pairs of successive probes at equal distance from the two probes of each pair. In the same way as before, the temperature of the injection of the methanol into the probes the closest to these sensors is then fixed as a function of the rate of cooling of the ground shown thereby.
However, in practice, it often occurs that, on the length of the wall to be congealed, the ground is heterogeneous not only horizontally but also vertically, at least in certain regions. There may therefore exist, in the height of certain probes regions which congeal rapidly and others which congeal slowly. Consequently, the overall measuring means mentioned hereinbefore would be liable to excessively slow down the cooling of a probe which would on the whole congeal rapidly (which would for example appear from a large difference of temperature between the entering methanol and the leaving methanol) but, in fact very rapidly in a portion of its length and very slowly in another portion.
In order to avoid this risk, the measurement may be refined by disposing a plurality of temperature sensors 7 on the length of the probes, on their outer wall, these sensors being adapted to measure the temperature of the ground in the immediate vicinity of the probes. One can then proceed in two manners:
(c) At the beginning of the cooling, the rate of cooling at each of these points is measured, or
(d) A certain time after the beginning of the congelation, there is temporarily injected, for example for 10 to 30 minutes, methanol which is warmer than the ground, and there is measured the rate of elevation of the temperature at the different measuring points. Indeed, this rate of elevation varies in the same direction as the rate of congelation of the ground.
If this procedure permits a detection of a vertical heterogeneity of the ground, the determination of the temperature of injection of the methanol into the corresponding probe or probes will be based on the smallest temperature variation.
The following example illustrates the manner of carrying out the invention with the methods (a) and (d) mentioned hereinbefore. The basic data are the same as before. It is desired to congeal within 100 hours a wall having a thickness of 1 meter in a damp and sandy ground, to a depth of 20 meters and length of 50 meters. There are disposed in the ground fifty probes S1, S2 , . . . , S50 spaced 1 meter apart, and cooled methanol is circulated therethrough. Five heat exchangers E1 to E5 are employed which are independent and supplied with liquid nitrogen in accordance with the diagram of FIG. 3. By means of an appropriate set of pipes and valves (not shown), it is possible to feed any probe from any exchanger. Each probe is provided with temperature sensors 8 and 9 measuring the temperature of the methanol at its entrance and its exit respectively. Thermocouples 7 are disposed against the outer wall of each probe for the purpose of measuring the temperature at a depth of 2 meters, 10 meters, and 18 meters.
After the starting of the injection of methanol at -80° C. into all of the probes, there is a pause of 5 hours in order to allow the initial transitional effects to take place. There is observed at that moment on the probes the following temperature difference ΔT between the entrance and the exit of the methanol.
______________________________________probesN° 1 to 4 5 to 12 13, 14 15 to 25 26 to 40 41 to 50______________________________________T °C. 10 4 6 4 6 8______________________________________
The temperature of the outer surface of the probes is but slightly variable at this moment between -70° C. and -72° C. for all the probes.
By changing the set temperature of the exchangers E1 to E5, methanol at -50° C. is injected into the probes for 20 minutes. The rate of the rise in the external temperatures of the probes is measured. There is found at 18 meters depth on the probes S46 to S50 a rate of rise in temperature which is one third of those at depths of 10 meters and 2 meters on the same probes; no heterogeneity is found on the other probes.
The injection of cold methanol is then re-established by fixing the set temperatures in the following manner.
______________________________________probes 1 to 5 to 15 to 26 to 46 toN° 4 12 13, 14 25 40 41 to 45 50______________________________________temper- -55 -80 -70 -80 -70 -55 -80ature(°C.)Ex- E1 E2 & E4 & E5 E2 & E4 & E1 E2 &chang- E3 E3 E5 E3ers______________________________________
As can be seen, notwithstanding the results of the overall measurement, the probes S46 to S50 have been treated as probes having a slow congelation so as to take into account the slowness in the congelation observed in their deepest part.
Further, certain groups of probes are supplied by two exchangers connected in parallel. This provides a rate of flow of methanol on the same order for all the probes. Note also that, in order to avoid rendering the installation too complicated, the groups of probes S1 to S4 and S41 to S45 are supplied at the same temperature although, to be exact, the probes of these two groups absorb different heat fluxes.
It is clear from the foregoing that a refrigerating power is supplied to each probe which decreases as the ground surrounding this probe congeals more rapidly.
The following example illustrates the aforementioned procedure (b).
With the same basic data as in the preceding examples, there is disposed at 40 cm from the line of congelation probes a line of twenty-five temperature sensors C1, C2, . . . , C25 in the region of every other gap between the congelation probes, as indicated in FIG. 4, each sensor being located at an equal distance from 2 probes. The temperature sensor C1 is in the vicinity of the congelation probes S1 and S2, the temperature sensor C2 is in the vicinity of the congelation probes S3 and S4, etc.
Methanol at -80° C. is first of all injected into all of the congelation probes for 24 hours. At the end of 24 hours, the following temperatures are found on the temperature sensors.
______________________________________Probes 13 toN° 1, 2 3 to 6 7 8 to 12 20 21 to 23 24, 25______________________________________Temp. 0 +7 +4 +7 +4 +2 +6(°C.)Asso- 1 to 5 to 13, 14 15 to 25 to 41 to 47 tociated 4 12 24 24 46 50probesN°______________________________________
Thenceforth, the probes are supplied with methanol at different temperatures in the following manner:
______________________________________probes 1 to 15 to 25 toN° 4 5 to 12 13, 14 24 40 41 to 46 47 to 50______________________________________Metha- -55 -80 -70 -80 -70 -55 -80noltemp.(°C.)Ex- E1 E2 & E4 & E2 & E4 & E1 E2 & E3chang- E3 E5 E3 E5ersused______________________________________
The foregoing remarks concerning the use of the exchangers, alone or in parallel, still apply in this example.
Note that it is quite possible to combine the various regulating processes described hereinbefore, and in particular to vary the temperature of injection of the methanol with respect both to time and to space. In this case, after having fixed the various temperatures of injection of the methanol into the various groups of probes, there is defined for each group a series of increasingly warm steps arranged within the total duration of the congelation so as to supply methanol at the end of the congelation to all the probes at the single set temperature which will be maintained throughout the period during which the wall is maintained in the congealed state.
The following example thus combines the teachings of the foregoing Examples I and III and describes in table form the congelation procedure during the allowed 100 hours for obtaining a wall having a thickness of 1 meter.
______________________________________N° of time (h)probes 0 20 40 60 80 100______________________________________5 to 12 -80° -80° -65° -50° C. -40° C. -35° C.15 to 24 C. C. C. with to to47 to 50 to with with E2 all all all the E2 E2 E3 the the probes and and E4 probes probes with E3 E3 and with with13 & 14 the -70° -60° E5 E1 E125 to 40 exchang- C. C. to to ers with with E5 E5 E1 to E4 & E4 & E5 E5 E51 to 4 -55° -50° -40° C.41 to 46 C. C. with E1 with with E1 E1______________________________________
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3183675 *||Nov 2, 1961||May 18, 1965||Conch Int Methane Ltd||Method of freezing an earth formation|
|US3287915 *||Aug 19, 1963||Nov 29, 1966||Phillips Petroleum Co||Earthen storage for volatile liquids and method of constructing same|
|US3674086 *||Aug 7, 1970||Jul 4, 1972||Foster Alden W||Method of transporting oil or gas in frozen tundra|
|US3701262 *||Oct 12, 1970||Oct 31, 1972||Systems Capital Corp||Means for the underground storage of liquified gas|
|DE2614221A1 *||Apr 2, 1976||Oct 20, 1977||Holzmann Philipp Ag||Soil freezing procedure for underground workings - feeds liquid coolant from conventional refrigerator to heat exchanger which extracts heat of evaporation and releases vapour|
|FR1327179A *||Title not available|
|FR2113980A1 *||Title not available|
|FR2452550A1 *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4860544 *||Dec 8, 1988||Aug 29, 1989||Concept R.K.K. Limited||Closed cryogenic barrier for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth|
|US4974425 *||Aug 16, 1989||Dec 4, 1990||Concept Rkk, Limited||Closed cryogenic barrier for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth|
|US5050386 *||Jul 31, 1990||Sep 24, 1991||Rkk, Limited||Method and apparatus for containment of hazardous material migration in the earth|
|US6267172 *||Feb 15, 2000||Jul 31, 2001||Mcclung, Iii Guy L.||Heat exchange systems|
|US6585047||Jan 14, 2002||Jul 1, 2003||Mcclung, Iii Guy L.||System for heat exchange with earth loops|
|US6896054||Jun 11, 2003||May 24, 2005||Mcclung, Iii Guy L.||Microorganism enhancement with earth loop heat exchange systems|
|US7128156||May 19, 2005||Oct 31, 2006||Mcclung Iii Guy L||Wellbore rig with heat transfer loop apparatus|
|US7516785||Oct 10, 2007||Apr 14, 2009||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method of developing subsurface freeze zone|
|US7516787||Oct 10, 2007||Apr 14, 2009||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method of developing a subsurface freeze zone using formation fractures|
|US7631691||Dec 15, 2009||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Methods of treating a subterranean formation to convert organic matter into producible hydrocarbons|
|US7647971||Dec 23, 2008||Jan 19, 2010||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method of developing subsurface freeze zone|
|US7647972||Dec 23, 2008||Jan 19, 2010||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Subsurface freeze zone using formation fractures|
|US7669657||Mar 2, 2010||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Enhanced shale oil production by in situ heating using hydraulically fractured producing wells|
|US8082995||Dec 27, 2011||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Optimization of untreated oil shale geometry to control subsidence|
|US8087460||Jan 3, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Granular electrical connections for in situ formation heating|
|US8104537||Jan 31, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Method of developing subsurface freeze zone|
|US8122955||Apr 18, 2008||Feb 28, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Downhole burners for in situ conversion of organic-rich rock formations|
|US8146664||May 21, 2008||Apr 3, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Utilization of low BTU gas generated during in situ heating of organic-rich rock|
|US8151877||Apr 18, 2008||Apr 10, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Downhole burner wells for in situ conversion of organic-rich rock formations|
|US8151884||Oct 10, 2007||Apr 10, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Combined development of oil shale by in situ heating with a deeper hydrocarbon resource|
|US8176971||Dec 8, 2009||May 15, 2012||Mcclung Iii Guy Lamonte||Earth heat transfer loop apparatus|
|US8230929||Jul 31, 2012||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Methods of producing hydrocarbons for substantially constant composition gas generation|
|US8540020||Apr 21, 2010||Sep 24, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Converting organic matter from a subterranean formation into producible hydrocarbons by controlling production operations based on availability of one or more production resources|
|US8596355||Dec 10, 2010||Dec 3, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Optimized well spacing for in situ shale oil development|
|US8616279||Jan 7, 2010||Dec 31, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Water treatment following shale oil production by in situ heating|
|US8616280||Jun 17, 2011||Dec 31, 2013||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Wellbore mechanical integrity for in situ pyrolysis|
|US8622127||Jun 17, 2011||Jan 7, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Olefin reduction for in situ pyrolysis oil generation|
|US8622133||Mar 7, 2008||Jan 7, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Resistive heater for in situ formation heating|
|US8641150||Dec 11, 2009||Feb 4, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||In situ co-development of oil shale with mineral recovery|
|US8770284||Apr 19, 2013||Jul 8, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Systems and methods of detecting an intersection between a wellbore and a subterranean structure that includes a marker material|
|US8863839||Nov 15, 2010||Oct 21, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Enhanced convection for in situ pyrolysis of organic-rich rock formations|
|US8875789||Aug 8, 2011||Nov 4, 2014||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Process for producing hydrocarbon fluids combining in situ heating, a power plant and a gas plant|
|US9080441||Oct 26, 2012||Jul 14, 2015||Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company||Multiple electrical connections to optimize heating for in situ pyrolysis|
|US20030209340 *||Jun 11, 2003||Nov 13, 2003||Mcclung Guy L.||Microorganism enhancement with earth loop heat exchange systems|
|US20050205260 *||May 19, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||Mcclung Guy L Iii||Wellbore rig with heat transfer loop apparatus|
|US20080087420 *||Oct 10, 2007||Apr 17, 2008||Kaminsky Robert D||Optimized well spacing for in situ shale oil development|
|US20080087426 *||Oct 10, 2007||Apr 17, 2008||Kaminsky Robert D||Method of developing a subsurface freeze zone using formation fractures|
|US20080207970 *||Oct 10, 2007||Aug 28, 2008||Meurer William P||Heating an organic-rich rock formation in situ to produce products with improved properties|
|US20080230219 *||Mar 7, 2008||Sep 25, 2008||Kaminsky Robert D||Resistive heater for in situ formation heating|
|US20080271885 *||Mar 7, 2008||Nov 6, 2008||Kaminsky Robert D||Granular electrical connections for in situ formation heating|
|US20080290719 *||May 21, 2008||Nov 27, 2008||Kaminsky Robert D||Process for producing Hydrocarbon fluids combining in situ heating, a power plant and a gas plant|
|US20090101348 *||Dec 23, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Kaminsky Robert D||Method of Developing Subsurface Freeze Zone|
|US20090107679 *||Dec 23, 2008||Apr 30, 2009||Kaminsky Robert D||Subsurface Freeze Zone Using Formation Fractures|
|US20100078169 *||Apr 1, 2010||Symington William A||Methods of Treating Suberranean Formation To Convert Organic Matter Into Producible Hydrocarbons|
|US20100243201 *||Sep 30, 2010||Mcclung Iii Guy Lamonte||Earth heat transfer loop apparatus|
|US20100282460 *||Nov 11, 2010||Stone Matthew T||Converting Organic Matter From A Subterranean Formation Into Producible Hydrocarbons By Controlling Production Operations Based On Availability Of One Or More Production Resources|
|EP2098683A1||Mar 4, 2008||Sep 9, 2009||ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company||Optimization of untreated oil shale geometry to control subsidence|
|WO1990006480A1 *||Aug 23, 1989||Jun 14, 1990||Concept R.K.K. Limited||Closed cryogenic barrier for containment of hazardous material in the earth|
|WO2001061262A1 *||Feb 14, 2001||Aug 23, 2001||Mcclung Guy L Iii||Heat exchange systems|
|U.S. Classification||62/50.2, 165/45, 62/434, 62/260, 62/62|
|May 28, 1985||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: L AIR LIQUIDE, SOCIETE ANONYME POUR L ETUDE ET L E
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:KARINTHI, PIERRE;GARDENT, MAURICE;REGNIER, COLETTE;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:004411/0642
Effective date: 19850513
|Jan 22, 1990||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 5, 1994||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 28, 1994||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Nov 8, 1994||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19940831