|Publication number||US4685939 A|
|Application number||US 06/713,503|
|Publication date||Aug 11, 1987|
|Filing date||Mar 19, 1985|
|Priority date||Mar 19, 1985|
|Also published as||EP0195388A1|
|Publication number||06713503, 713503, US 4685939 A, US 4685939A, US-A-4685939, US4685939 A, US4685939A|
|Inventors||Wilbur C. Kratz, Shivaji Sircar|
|Original Assignee||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (26), Referenced by (25), Classifications (22), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to separation of gases by selective adsorption and is particularly concerned with the recovery from ambient air of an industrially useful gas product of enriched oxygen content.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,013,429, there is a discussion of various systems disclosed in prior patent literature for fractionation of air by selective adsorption. In general, these prior art processes usually employ a column containing a bed of adsorbent selective for retention of nitrogen, through which bed the feed air is passed, with the discharge therefrom of a primary effluent highly enriched in oxygen. Regeneration of the nitrogen-loaded bed is carried out by pressure reduction and/or purging the bed with a gas stream. The aim of these prior art processes is to obtain a product stream of high oxygen content, greater than about 80% O2, and the steps of the process and operating conditions are designed to attain this end. The oxygen recovery (defined as oxygen actually recovered as enriched air as a percentage of total oxygen in the air feed) for such high enrichment processes have been in the order of about 40%. Operation of a high-enrichment process in a way so as to obtain a product of lower oxygen content leads to even lower recovery efficiency.
As examples of such prior art process employing an initial high pressure in the adsorption step and a pressure near atmospheric during nitrogen desorption (PSA), reference is made to U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,944,627 and 3,717,974.
In other described prior art processes, desorption of nitrogen from the bed is carried out at subatmospheric pressure (VSA), as exemplified by U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,796,022; 4,013,429; 4,129,424 and 4,168,149.
The favored adsorbents for selective retention of nitrogen are commercially available synthetic zeolites such as type A, type X and mordenites. In most of the prior art processes, provision is made for removal of water and CO2 from the feed air before its introduction into the nitrogen sorption bed.
While there are a number of applications where highly oxygen-enriched air is required or desired, there are also certain industrial processes in which enriched air of lower oxygen concentration can be and is employed. Thus, in combustion processes of various kinds and in chemical and biolchemical reactors, air containing in the range of about 23 to 45% O2 is utilized. Such moderately oxygen-enriched air is obtained by the addition of relatively pure oxygen in liquid or gaseous state to an ambient air stream. While such approach is technically satisfactory, it is relatively costly and may be economically undesirable in certain applications which would otherwise benefit from the use of such moderately oxygen-enriched air products. A
Among the objects of the present invention is to provide a simple and economical process for production from ambient air of a useful oxygen-enriched product gas of controlled moderate oxygen concentration, at high oxygen recovery efficiency.
In accordance with the invention, there is produced from ambient air by selective adsorption techniques an oxygen-enriched gas product having an oxygen content of 23 to 50 volume percent. In practice of the invention, a largely simplified adiabatic pressure swing adsorption cycle (PSA) is employed. The process is operated by admitting the feed air into a column, preferably at one end thereof, containing a bed of nitrogen-selective adsorbent until the column is brought from atmospheric pressure to a first pressure of several atmospheres. The column pressure is then reduced to an intermediate second pressure level, by removing oxygen enriched air as product from the column in a flow direction concurrent with that of the initial introduction of feed air into the bed, such as at the opposite end of the column from feed air introduction. Then the column pressure is further reduced to atmospheric by venting in a flow direction counter to that of withdrawal of oxygen enriched product, such as by venting through the initial air inlet end, thus completing the cycle and preparing the column for repetition of the cycle sequence. By such modest operation, there is obtained an oxygen-enriched product gas of 23-26% oxygen content, with recovery of about 75 to 85% of the oxygen from the feed air.
An oxygen-enriched product gas of higher oxygen content as that containing up to 50% oxygen is obtained by including an added step in the cycle sequence. Following the venting of the column, the bed is purged with part of the oxygen enriched air product in a flow direction countercurrent to the feed air introduction and the cycle is repeated, thereby providing an oxygen enriched product from subsequent cycles containing up to about 50% oxygen. Alternatively, it has been found advantageous in certain instances to operate the process of the invention under conditions such as to obtain from ambient air an enriched effluent having up to about 30 to 50% oxygen, which can then be simply diluted with ambient air to obtain a mixed product gas of lower oxygen content as in the desired range of 23 to 35% O2.
In the conduct of the process of this method the first pressure can be in the range from super atmospheric up to about 10 atmospheres. Generally, this first pressure is maintained at a level of at least about 1.5 atmospheres. While the upper limit of this first pressure can be as high as about 10 atmospheres, it is preferable that pressures somewhat lower than 10 atmospheres be employed. Thus, for example, it is preferable to limit the upper level of the first pressure to no more than about 7 atmospheres, with pressures limited to 5 atmospheres and even as low as 4 atmospheres having been found to be quite satisfactory. It will be understood, of course, that certaain efficiencies in operation can be effected by the utilization of lower pressures.
In connection with the removal of oxygen-enriched air as product, it is an essential part of this invention that the second pressure be at a level no greater than 0.75 times the first pressure. Preferably, the second pressure can be less than 0.7 times the first pressure, with satisfactory results having been achieved when utilizing second pressures which are only 0.67 or even 0.60 times the first pressure. It will also be understood, of course, that whatever pressure level is selected for the second pressure, it must be greater than atmospheric pressure.
In the operation of this invention, it must be noted that the step of venting to atmospheric pressure occurs immediately following the depressuring to a second pressure level and recovery of product. There is no intermediate purging of the bed or reduction to subatmospheric pressure intermediate the two steps recited. Additionally, the initial pressuring of the adsorbent bed to the first pressure level is effected solely by the introduction of ambient air to the bed. There is no supplemental pressuring of the bed by the introduction of an additional gas.
In the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic flow sheet of a system suitable for practice of the invention for the production from ambient air of a gas product having an oxygen content of 23 to 30%;
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic flow sheet of a system for practice of the invention for the production from ambient air of a gas product having an oxygen content of over 23 to 50%;
FIG. 3 is a series of graphs showing (a) the weight amount of oxygen produced from the feed air per unit amount of adsorbent at various levels of oxygen purity and (b) the oxygen recovery from feed air at these O2 purity levels; and
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic flow chart of an alternative embodiment of the invention.
While not limited thereto, the illustrated embodiment in FIG. 1 shows three adsorbent columns designated A, B and C operated in parallel. The feed air is compressed at 10, cooled to near ambient temperature in water cooler 40, passed through a knockout drum 41 for removal of condensed water and is passed via line 11 into a selected one of the columns then on stream. Each of the columns is packed with two layers of adsorbent. The layer at the feed end will remove water and at least part of the carbon dioxide from the feed air. Any of the known adsorbents generally used for this purpose may be employed, such as type A or type X molecular sieve zeolite, alumina, silica gel and activated carbon. For the contiguous second layer, there may be employed any of the known adsorbents selective for retention of nitrogen, such as synthetic mordenite, or type A or type X molecular sieve zeolite, which may be exchanged with various cations.
Assuming that Column A is to receive the influent air feed, Column A will be initially at atmospheric pressure. With valve 12 open and valves 13 and 14 closed, introduction of compressed air into Column A will be continued as a first step until a first designed, superatmospheric pressure level is reached in the column, which pressure level can be up to about 10 atmospheres, preferably in the range of 1.5 to 4 atmospheres. In the next step of the cycle sequence, valve 12 is closed and valve 14 opened, whereby a primary effluent enriched in oxygen is withdrawn from Column A and passed via line 15 into a collection vessel 16 serving as a product surge tank from which tank the enriched product gas may be withdrawn for desired use via line 18. Withdrawal of product from Column A is continued until the pressure therein is reduced to a second preset, intermediate level above atmospheric.
When the designed intermediate pressure level is attained, valve 14 is closed and valve 13 is opened, whereby Column A is vented to atmospheric pressure, the residual gas being desorbed and discharged via line 20. Column A is then ready for repetition of the sequence of operations with readmission of ambient air thereto.
The process steps for Columns B and C, in turn, follow the identical sequence as described for Column A in offset relation. The positions of the valves associated with the particular columns of a 3 column system are shown in Table 1 based on a 90-second operating cycle, in which feed gas is continuously introduced to and enriched gas continuously withdrawn from the system.
TABLE 1______________________________________Time Columns ValvesSec. A B C 12 13 14 22 23 24 32 33 34______________________________________ 0-30 Ad D2 D1 O C C C O C C C O 30-60 D1 Ad D2 C C O O C C C O C 60-90 D2 D1 Ad C O C C C O O C C______________________________________ C = Close O = Open Ad = Adsorption D1 = First depressurization D2 = Second depressurization
While Table 1 shows a 90-second three-step cycle, it will be understood that longer or shorter operating cycles may be employed as from about 30 to 720 seconds equally timed for (1) nitrogen adsorption, (2) depressurizing to intermediate pressure level and (3) venting to atmospheric pressure.
The described 3-step cycle can be employed for enriching ambient air to an oxygen content of 23 to 30%. Although the process is described for a three column system, by proper sizing of the surge vessel, it can be carried out with only one or two columns.
The embodiment shown in FIG. 2 can be employed for the production of an enriched product gas having an oxygen content of over 23 to 50%. For this purpose, an additional step is employed in the cycle wherein the on-stream column is purged following the venting step. The adsorbent packing in each of the columns is the same as that previously described.
The four columns in the FIG. 2 embodiment are labeled A through D. As before, referring to Column A, that column is initially at atmospheric pressure. The pressure in the column is increased to the designed superatmospheric level (1.5 to 4 atmospheres) by introducing compressed feed air at near ambient temperature, after removal of condensed water, through open valve 12, with valves 13 and 14 being closed. Then the pressure is reduced to an intermediate level above atmospheric, by withdrawing product enriched air through opened valve 14, with valves 12 and 13 being closed. The enriched product gas passes into tank 16 or from another column producing it via line 15. In the third step of the cycle the pressure in Column A is reduced to atmospheric by venting residual gas from the bed through valve 13, with valves 12 and 14 closed. Following the venting, as a final step in the cycle, Column A is purged with enriched air withdrawn from the product surge tank 16, or from another column producing it via line 15 and passed through column A countercurrent to the direction of feed air introduction by way of open valves 14 and 13 to vent.
The purge step desorbs more N2 from the column and sharpens the adsorption mass transfer zone and produces a product gas of higher oxygen content in the following adsorption step of the next repeated cycle. The process sequence for columns B, C and D is the same but the steps are offset so that the product production step and the air feed step are continuous throughout the cycle. The valve sequences for the four bed system are shown in Table 2. Here again, the process could be carried out with one to three columns by utilizing a product surge vessel of appropriate size.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Time Columns ValvesSec. A B C D 12 13 14 22 23 24 32 33 34 42 43 44__________________________________________________________________________ 0-30 Ad P D2 D1 O C C C O O C O C C C O30-60 D1 Ad P D2 C C O O C C C O O C O C60-90 D2 D1 Ad P C O C C C O O C C C O O 90-120 P D2 D1 Ad C O O C O C C C O O C C__________________________________________________________________________ C = Close O = Open Ad = Adsorption D1 = First depressurization D2 = Second depressurization P = Purge
In the four step cycle as well as in the three step cycle the temperature range for the process can be 10° to 60° C. Also the four-step cycle may be carried out in a shorter or longer time period than 120 seconds as in the range of 40 to 960 seconds, with equal time for each of the four steps.
In an experimental run operated in the three-step mode, each of the adsorbent beds employed was 4 inches (10.16 cm) in diameter and 16 ft. (4.88 meters) long. The layer of adsorbent for CO2 and water removal in each bed was 14 pounds (6.35 kg.) of type X molecular sieve and that of the nitrogen retaining layer was 42 pounds (19 kg.) of the same zeolite. The column was initially brought from atmospheric pressure to 3 atmospheres by admitting 7.3 SCF (207 liters) of ambient air. The column pressure was then reduced from 3 atmospheres to 1.7 atmospheres by withdrawal of 5.1 SCF (144 liters) of enriched air, which had an oxygen content of 25 volume percent. Finally, the column pressure was reduced to atmospheric by venting and the cycle repeated. 83% of the oxygen content of the feed air was recovered in the enriched gas product.
In an experimental run employing the four step mode of operation, the bed size and adsorbent layers were the same as in the foregoing example. In the initial adsorption step the column pressure was increased from atmospheric to 3 atmospheres by introduction of 7.3 SCF (207 liters) of air feed. Then the pressure was reduced to 2 atmospheres by withdrawal of enriched product gas; following which the column was vented to a pressure of one atmosphere. Finally, the beds of adsorbent were purged with enriched gas product withdrawn from the surge vessel. The enriched product rate obtained was 4.0 SCF (113.0 liters) per bed and the enriched air purity was 28.0% oxygen. The oxygen recovery from the feed air in the enriched product gas was 73%.
It has been found that in certain combustion processes higher flame temperatures are required than that which can be obtained with ambient air. Such higher flame temperatures have been attained with modest increases in the oxygen content of the air employed. For these and other processes employing oxygen-containing gas, combustion efficiency can be more than doubled by enriching the air utilized from the normal 21% oxygen to levels in the order of 25 to 35% oxygen. Heretofore, such oxygen enriched gas was obtained by the addition of pure oxygen. The admixture of pure oxygen is relatively expensive and is regarded by some potential users as hazardous. The present invention provides a simple and economically attractive route for directly obtaining from ambient air moderately enriched gas for industrial use, containing up to 45% O2. In addition to use of such enriched gas in the usual combustion processes, these may be beneficially employed in various oxidation processes used in chemical and biochemical reactors.
While an oxygen enriched product of 23-26% O2 can be obtained directly from ambient air by operation of the three step process sequence of FIG. 1 and Table 1, it has been found more efficient economically to employ the process sequence of FIG. 2 and Table 2 to produce an oxygen enriched product effluent of over 26% O2 and up to about 30-45% O2 and to dilute the obtained effluent product with atmospheric air to provide an oxygen-enriched product of desired oxygen concentration in the 23-26% range.
A number of individual runs were made, as shown in FIG. 3 under conditions to produce oxygen-enriched products in accordance with the invention, having progressively increased oxygen concentration from about 25% to 48% and the percent of oxygen recovered plotted at each concentration as shown in Graph B of FIG. 3. These operations were carried out at 21° C. and at an attained on-stream pressure of 40 psig, using a CO2 -free dry air feed. The pressure let-down level was adjusted and the purge time was increased from run to run to obtain increased oxygen enrichment.
Graph A of FIG. 3 records the amount of zeolite adsorbent utilized in terms of pound moles of contained oxygen produced per hundred thousand pounds of the adsorbent in the bed.
The mixing of ambient air with the oxygen enriched effluent from the adsorption process is diagrammatically illustrated in FIG. 4. Ambient air F is compressed to a desired pressure of several atmospheres and charged to a selective adsorption system such as illustrated in FIG. 2, obtaining an oxygen enriched product E having an oxygen concentration of over 26%. The desorbed waste gas W and purge gas are vented from the column. To obtain a final product P of desired oxygen concentration ambient air A (containing 21% oxygen) is admixed in suitable amount to provide the desired oxygen concentration.
TABLE 3______________________________________MATERIAL AND ENERGY BALANCE ACCORDING TOFIG. 4 TO PRODUCE 25% OXYGEN AIR R (O2 KWH lbsy, Recovery) lb mole Adsorbent% O2 in Oxy-rich A/P F/P E/P of P per bed/P______________________________________0.25 0.84 0 1.42 1.0 0.52 23320.30 0.71 0.56 0.89 0.44 0.44 15110.40 0.56 0.79 0.72 0.21 0.42 12530.50 0.48 0.86 0.68 0.14 0.43 1169______________________________________
Table 3 shows the material and energy balance according to FIGS. 3 and 4 to produce a product of 25% O2 concentration utilizing an oxygen enriched effluent of 30, 40, and 50% O2 to which ambient air is added, as compared to a directly produced product of 25% O2. The table shows the amount of oxygen (R) recovered from the adsorption process at the several levels of oxygen concentration, the proportions of added ambient air (A/P) and oxygen-enriched effluent (E/P) used to make 25% O2 product; the quantity of feed air (F/P) employed to produce P, the total energy required in KWH per pound mole of product, and the amount in pounds of nitrogen retaining adsorbent used in production of the product of 25% O2 concentration.
As seen from Table 3 there is a 25% reduction in overall energy requirement and 50% reduction in adsorbent inventory, if the enrichment process is employed to produce 40% oxygen gas and diluted back to 25% O2 concentration as compared to direct production of 25% O2 enriched gas.
While Table 3 relates particularly to operation of the process of the invention under conditions to obtain an oxygen enriched effluent of 30 to 50% oxygen concentration and diluting the effluent with ambient air to obtain a final gas product of 25% O2 concentration, it will be understood that other desired products in the range of about 25 to 35% O2 can similarly be prepared by proportioning the quantity of ambient air added to an oxygen-enriched gas stream produced in accordance with the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2944627 *||Feb 12, 1958||Jul 12, 1960||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Method and apparatus for fractionating gaseous mixtures by adsorption|
|US3140931 *||Dec 1, 1960||Jul 14, 1964||Union Carbide Corp||Separation of an oxygen-nitrogen mixture|
|US3142547 *||Dec 18, 1961||Jul 28, 1964||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Pressure equalization depressuring in heatless adsorption|
|US3155468 *||Nov 10, 1958||Nov 3, 1964||Air Liquide||Process for separating a binary gaseous mixture by adsorption|
|US3164454 *||Sep 25, 1959||Jan 5, 1965||Aerojet General Co||Method of separating oxygen from air|
|US3176444 *||Sep 4, 1962||Apr 6, 1965||Union Carbide Corp||Adsorption separation process|
|US3237377 *||Apr 12, 1962||Mar 1, 1966||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Oxygen concentration process|
|US3242645 *||Dec 11, 1962||Mar 29, 1966||I Air Liquide Sa Pour L Etude||Process for separating a binary gas mixture by contact with an adsorbent|
|US3313091 *||Nov 4, 1963||Apr 11, 1967||Exxon Research Engineering Co||Vacuum cycle adsorption|
|US3636679 *||Jan 4, 1971||Jan 25, 1972||Union Carbide Corp||Selective adsorption gas separation process|
|US3638398 *||Aug 1, 1969||Feb 1, 1972||Air Liquide||Method of separation by substantially isothermal selective adsorption of a gaseous mixture|
|US3717974 *||Jan 24, 1972||Feb 27, 1973||Union Carbide Corp||Selective adsorption process for air separation|
|US3738087 *||Jul 1, 1971||Jun 12, 1973||Union Carbide Corp||Selective adsorption gas separation process|
|US3796022 *||Nov 20, 1972||Mar 12, 1974||Air Liquide||Method of and installation for the fractionation of a gaseous mixture by adsorption|
|US3923477 *||Oct 22, 1974||Dec 2, 1975||British Oxygen Co Ltd||Adsorption system|
|US3957463 *||Dec 12, 1973||May 18, 1976||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Oxygen enrichment process|
|US4013429 *||Jun 4, 1975||Mar 22, 1977||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Fractionation of air by adsorption|
|US4070164 *||Jul 13, 1976||Jan 24, 1978||Toray Industries, Inc.||Adsorption-desorption pressure swing gas separation|
|US4129424 *||May 5, 1977||Dec 12, 1978||Boc Limited||Gas separation|
|US4168149 *||Dec 20, 1977||Sep 18, 1979||Boc Limited||Gas separation|
|US4194891 *||Dec 27, 1978||Mar 25, 1980||Union Carbide Corporation||Multiple bed rapid pressure swing adsorption for oxygen|
|US4194892 *||Jun 26, 1978||Mar 25, 1980||Union Carbide Corporation||Rapid pressure swing adsorption process with high enrichment factor|
|US4222750 *||Aug 16, 1976||Sep 16, 1980||Champion Spark Plug Company||Oxygen enrichment system for medical use|
|US4264339 *||Mar 15, 1979||Apr 28, 1981||Bergwerksverband Gmbh||Process for the recovery of nitrogen-rich gases from gases containing at least oxygen as other component|
|US4359328 *||Oct 9, 1981||Nov 16, 1982||Union Carbide Corporation||Inverted pressure swing adsorption process|
|US4512780 *||Nov 8, 1983||Apr 23, 1985||Union Carbide Corporation||Pressure swing adsorption with intermediate product recovery|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4867766 *||Sep 12, 1988||Sep 19, 1989||Union Carbide Corporation||Oxygen enriched air system|
|US4896514 *||Oct 31, 1988||Jan 30, 1990||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Air-conditioning apparatus|
|US4902309 *||Nov 2, 1988||Feb 20, 1990||Hempenstall George T||Improved method for the ignition and combustion of particulates in diesel exhaust gases|
|US4916630 *||Sep 30, 1988||Apr 10, 1990||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force||Bed tester for molecular sieve oxygen concentrator|
|US5114440 *||Mar 19, 1991||May 19, 1992||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the adsorptive oxygen-enrichment of air with mixtures of ca zeolite a molecular sieves by means of vacuum swing adsorption|
|US5152813 *||Dec 20, 1991||Oct 6, 1992||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Nitrogen adsorption with a Ca and/or Sr exchanged lithium X-zeolite|
|US5344474 *||Apr 28, 1993||Sep 6, 1994||Air Dry Corporation Of America||Gas separation device|
|US5395427 *||Jan 12, 1994||Mar 7, 1995||Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.||Two stage pressure swing adsorption process which utilizes an oxygen selective adsorbent to produce high purity oxygen from a feed air stream|
|US5413625 *||Dec 17, 1992||May 9, 1995||Praxair, Inc.||Mixed ion-exchanged zeolites and processes for the use thereof in gas separations|
|US5415683 *||Nov 17, 1993||May 16, 1995||Praxair Technology, Inc.||Vacuum pressure swing adsorption process|
|US5470378 *||Dec 27, 1993||Nov 28, 1995||Arbor Research Corporation||System for separation of oxygen from argon/oxygen mixture|
|US5871565 *||Jan 15, 1997||Feb 16, 1999||Praxair Technology, Inc.||Vacuum/pressure swing adsorption (VPSA) for production of an oxygen enriched gas|
|US5906674 *||Dec 16, 1997||May 25, 1999||The Boc Group, Inc.||Process and apparatus for separating gas mixtures|
|US6478850||Mar 8, 2002||Nov 12, 2002||Wearair Oxygen Inc.||Miniaturized wearable oxygen concentrator|
|US6547851||Aug 2, 2001||Apr 15, 2003||Wearair Oxygen Inc.||Miniaturized wearable oxygen concentrator|
|US7601202||Jul 7, 2005||Oct 13, 2009||Blue Membranes Gmbh||Method and device for reducing the carbon dioxide concentration in air|
|US8161748||Mar 1, 2004||Apr 24, 2012||Clearvalue Technologies, Inc.||Water combustion technology—methods, processes, systems and apparatus for the combustion of hydrogen and oxygen|
|US8268269||Jul 23, 2007||Sep 18, 2012||Clearvalue Technologies, Inc.||Manufacture of water chemistries|
|US9034405||Jul 28, 2006||May 19, 2015||Apio, Inc.||Combinations of atmosphere control members|
|US9034408||Dec 13, 2004||May 19, 2015||Apio, Inc.||Packaging|
|US20050161339 *||Jan 24, 2005||Jul 28, 2005||Haase Richard A.||Methods and processes for the manufacture of polynucleate metal compounds and disinfectants|
|US20080053104 *||Jul 23, 2007||Mar 6, 2008||Clearvalue Technologies||Manufacture of water chemistries|
|US20080127821 *||Jul 7, 2005||Jun 5, 2008||Andreas Noack||Method and device for reducing the carbon dioxide concentration in air|
|US20090104317 *||Jul 28, 2006||Apr 23, 2009||Raymond Clarke||Combinations of Atmosphere Control Members|
|USRE34434 *||Sep 18, 1991||Nov 9, 1993||Praxair Technology, Inc.||Oxygen enriched air system|
|U.S. Classification||95/100, 95/130|
|International Classification||C01B21/04, C01B13/02, B01D53/047, B01D53/04|
|Cooperative Classification||Y02C10/08, B01D2259/40081, B01D2259/403, B01D2253/108, B01D2259/404, B01D2257/80, B01D2259/40052, B01D2259/4006, B01D2257/504, B01D2259/4145, B01D2257/102, B01D2256/12, B01D53/0473, B01D2259/4003, B01D2259/40062|
|Mar 19, 1985||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC., P.O. BOX 538, AL
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:KRATZ, WILBUR C.;SIRCAR, SHIVAJI;REEL/FRAME:004392/0858
Effective date: 19850319
|Oct 26, 1990||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 21, 1995||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 13, 1995||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 24, 1995||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19950816