|Publication number||US4833412 A|
|Application number||US 07/179,014|
|Publication date||May 23, 1989|
|Filing date||Apr 8, 1988|
|Priority date||Apr 8, 1988|
|Also published as||DE68925143D1, DE68925143T2, EP0336591A2, EP0336591A3, EP0336591B1|
|Publication number||07179014, 179014, US 4833412 A, US 4833412A, US-A-4833412, US4833412 A, US4833412A|
|Inventors||Albert P. Zens|
|Original Assignee||Varian Associates, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (21), Classifications (7), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention is related to RF probe circuits in the context of nuclear magnetic resonance apparatus and more particularly, with such apparatus requiring a double tuned probe.
A double tuned circuit is one which exhibits a resonant condition for at least two discrete frequencies. In the field of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) instruments, the need for such arrangement is experienced in diverse circumstances. One such circumstance is presented where it is desired to irradiate a sample at a high frequency for one purpose while concurrently irradiating the sample at a relatively low frequency for another purpose. This is typical of a decoupling experiment, an example of which is the decoupling of carbon 13--hydrogen bonds while separately exciting the carbon 13 resonance.
A variation of such an arrangement is the concurrent excitation or observation of chemically distinct samples where one such sample is a control for instrumental purposes, as in establishing a field frequency lock, while the second sample is under examination. An example of this may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 3,434,043. A similar circumstance is the desire to concurrently excite selected different nuclei for acquisition of corresponding spectral response.
A double tuned circuit ordinarily utilizes a single inductor common to two resonant circuits. Each circuit in such an arrangement is separately tuned and impedance matched to its respective RF source (or sink). What is necessary for this arrangement is an isolation element between the high frequency and low frequency sources. Double tuned circuits are known which employ a cable of length λ/4 (at the high frequency) to provide such isolation. See, for example, Stoll, Vega and Vaughan, Rev. Sci. Inst., V. 48, pp. 800-803 (1977). Balanced circuits exhibiting electrical (e.g., RF) symmetry are also known for the purpose of supporting double tuned apparatus. Such circuits, among other properties, exhibit the virtue that a symmetry plane (or other surface) is defined which has a property of electrical neutrality, e.g., a virtual ground.
Inductive elements in RF probe circuits are known to include "split inductors" such as taught in the work of Alderman and Grant, J. Mag. Res., V. 36, pp. 447-451 (1979).
FIG. 1 shows the general context of a system embodying this invention.
FIG. 2 shows a circuit generally describing the invention.
FIG. 3a shows one embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 3b shows a frequency response simulation for the circuit of FIG. 3a.
FIG. 4a shows a simple model double tuned, single inductor circuit.
FIG. 4b shows a frequency response simulation of the FIG. 4a circuit.
FIG. 5 is an elementary double tuned circuit.
FIG. 6 compares the efficiencies of the double tuned circuits of FIGS. 3a, 4a and 5.
Portions of a typical NMR data acquisition instrument are schematically illustrated on FIG. 1. An acquisition/control processor 10 communicates with an RF transmitter 12, modulator 14 and receiver 16, including analog-to-digital converter 18 and a further processor 20. The modulated RF power irradiates an object (not shown) in a magnetic field 21 through a probe assembly 22 and the response of the object is intercepted by probe 22 communicating with receiver 16. The response typically takes the form of a transient oscillatory signal, or free induction decay. This transient waveform is sampled at regular intervals and samples are digitized in ADC 18. The digitized time domain waveform is then subject to further processing in processor 20. The nature of such processing may include averaging a time domain waveform with a number of similar such waveforms, and transformation of the average time domain waveform to the frequency domain yields a spectral distribution function directed to output device 24. The latter may take on any of a number of identities for the display of further analysis and data.
The magnetic field 21 which polarizes the sample is established by an appropriate means indicated in FIG. 1 in a cryostat 23 for maintaining a superconducting phase in a solenoid, not shown. The cryostat comprises a bore 23a in which the probe and sample are housed at room temperature.
Turning now to FIG. 2 there is shown a circuit representative of a double tuned, balanced, split inductance RF probe suitable for experiments requiring the double tuned property in a sample volume V defined in a geometric sense between the inductances L1.sup.(a) and L1.sup.(b). The circuit arrangement permits the low frequency RF applied at 32 to circulate through L2.sup.(a) thence over the loop comprising L1.sup.(b), L2.sup.(c), L1.sup.(a) and L2.sup.(b) to ground. Concurrently, high frequency RF is applied at 36 and propagates in the inductive loop L1.sup.(a) and L1.sup.(b) and the inductance L2 represents parallel current paths.
Physical implementations of this circuit are subject to constraint in certain apparatus. For example, in NMR analytic instruments the probe is housed typically within the bore of a superconducting magnet. An inductor L2.sup.(c) for trapping the low frequency RF presents problems in minimizing the coupling of such a trap coil to the inductance L1 and L1.sup.(b). There is an advantage in realizing the trap inductance in distributed form as a (substantially) λ/4 cable. The balanced nature of the circuit is emphasized by virtual ground VG.
Turning now to FIG. 3a there is shown a preferred embodiment for realizing the desired circuit. A pair of H shaped conductors 40 and 42 are arranged with arms and legs and configured to form a body of cylindrical symmetry. The central portion of the H shaped member is parallel with the axis of symmetry. The corresponding arms are electrically connected by chip capacitors 44 and 45 and the adjacent legs are similarly joined by chip capacitors 46 and 47. The H shaped conductors 40 and 42 form a pair of inductive elements (implementing inductors L1.sup.(a) and L1.sup.(b)) and the coupling coefficient of these inductors is close to unity. Each inductor is connected at one end to a resonant structure which presents a relatively high impedance to the selected high frequency. The other end of each of the H shaped members 40 and 42 are connected respectively to similar resonance structures 60 and 62 with similar properties. These implement the trap inductor L2.sup.(a) and L2.sup.(b) . The low frequency excitation is delivered from connector 64 through matching capacitor 65 to resonator 60. Corresponding resonator 62 is coupled through capacitor 68 to ground and the resonators are capacitively coupled through variable capacitor 69. High frequency RF is applied at connector 66 through capacitor 67 to the inductive element 42 and in parallel with capacitor 56 to ground. The resonant structures 50, 52, 60 and 62 may be realized b coaxial cables of length not to exceed λ/2. Capacitances 49, 51, 61 and 65, here expressly shown, serve to tune the respective transmission lines and thus adjust the effective length of the corresponding transmission line.
FIG. 3b shows the simulated frequency response for the circuit of FIG. 3a for the circuit components as below:
______________________________________Label Value Label Value______________________________________40 61 nh 54,56 .109 pf42 61 nh 61,63 19.29 pf44,45,46,57 1.125 pf 49,51,67 2.16 pf50,52 .0625 meters 65,68 3.43 pf60,62 Zo = 77Ω 69 9.09 pf atten: .04 db______________________________________
Several spurious resonances are found in this example. The location of such artifacts depends upon details of circuit elements. While characterized as "spurious", such artifacts reflect reactive couplings which may be analyzed as comprising additional (unbalanced) circuit loop(s) and characterized by corresponding resonant behavior. Thus, where it is desirable to obtain further discrete resonant behavior, such response may be tailored for this purpose. The circuit is balanced and is characterized by a virtual ground plane such that it is unnecessary to establish a real ground at capacitances 54 and 56 (these capacitances may be simply interconnected). The presence or absence of real ground at such points on the virtual ground symmetry axis will affect the character of the spurious resonances.
One figure of merit for performance of the double tuned probe of FIGS. 2 and 3a is to consider the high frequency current (400 MHz) circulating in the loop comprising inductors L1.sup.(a) and L1.sup.(b) per unit high frequency power presented at input 36 or 66. For the parameters given above, this is 839 mA/(watt)1/2. A similar figure of merit for the low frequency (100 MHz) current is 1405 mA/(watt)1/2. These figures are less for a double tuned circuit than can be achieved for a corresponding single tuned coil with the same inductance. Assume as a reference, a tuned coil of the same inductance with Q=400 at 400 MHz and Q proportional to the square root of frequency. The value for the corresponding figure of merit for the respective frequencies is 1142 mA/(watt)1/2 (at 400 MHz) and 1615 mA/(watt)1/2 (at 100 MHz). Thus, in comparison to the reference coil, the double tuned probe of the invention exhibits a relative efficiency of 0.734 at 400 MHz and 0.870 at 100 MHz.
A particularly useful perspective for considering the effectiveness of a probe may be gained by comparing the pulse duration required at 1 watt input to obtain a 90° mutation of a resonant nuclear spin system. For protons at 400 MHz, the reference coil requires 19.2 μsec and the subject double tuned probe requires 26.2 μsec. For C13 at 100 MHz, the reference coil requires 54.1 μsec and the subject double tuned probe requires 62.2 μsec.
A further realistic performance comparison may be had with respect to a model single inductor double tuned balanced circuit such as shown in FIG. 4a. The parameters of the model circuit are adjusted to obtain the same (simulated) performance (FIG. 4b) as obtained for the circuit of FIG. 3a. Thus the resonant frequencies are fixed and the single inductor 70 of the model circuit presents the same total inductance as the use of split inductors 40 and 42. The resonant RF impedances corresponding to resonators 60 and 62 are furnished by respective resonators 72 and 76 with corresponding tuning capacitances 74 and 78. In the preferred form of coaxial cable, the resonators 72 and 76 are necessarily twice the length as required for the performance of FIG. 3a for otherwise identical cable.
The respective circuit component values (consistent with the constraints) for the model circuit (FIG. 4a) are as below:
______________________________________Capacitances Value______________________________________80 24.17 Pf82 2.80 Pf84 0.48 Pf86 2.38 Pf______________________________________ Coaxial lines: Zo = 77Ω; length = 0.125 M; attenuation = 0.040 db
The model may also be compared to the reference coil in the same manner as was the double tuned probe of the invention. The relative efficiency for the model at 400 MHz is 0.733 and at 100 MHz is 0.893. Thus, the double tuned probe of the invention closely approaches the performance of a model (single inductor) double tuned probe.
FIG. 5 shows an elementary example of a double tuned circuit with transmission line isolation between high and low frequency channels. The tuning capacitances 92 and 94 for high frequency and low frequency channels are respectively 4.56 pf. and 27.31 pf. Matching capacitances 96 and 98 for high frequency and low frequency channels are respectively 0.63 pf. and 3.12 pf.
The comparison of the present invention with the model circuit of FIG. 4a when tuned to 200 MHz and 50 MHz and the elementary double tuned circuit of FIG. 5 when tuned to 200 MHz and 50 MHz is facilitated by examination of FIG. 6 which is calculated for circuits operating at a high frequency of 200 MHz and a low frequency of 50 MHz. The efficiency for both high and low frequency channels is shown for each of the circuits of FIGS. 3a, 4a and 5 as a function of total trap inductance. For any one of these circuits there is a practical limit to the achievable trap inductance. For coaxial elements discussed herein, this limit occurs at λ/2. (For lumped inductances, a similar limit occurs as imposed by stray capacitances between windings of the inductor.) The present invention allows the use of greater trap inductances (L=4 arbitrary units) with the result of increasing the limiting efficiency of the high frequency channel compared with FIGS. 4a and 5, albeit at the expense of the low frequency channel. However, the compromise is motivated by the need to achieve a desired higher efficiency in the high frequency channel which efficiency would not otherwise be available. The extension of the present invention to higher high frequency efficiency is achievable through additional segmentation of the inductance L1, (the NMR observe coil) to a further number of segments with concomitant additional trap inductance.
In the present invention the use of shielded coaxial cables for trap inductors (50 and 52) and inductances 60 and 62 contribute two very useful mechanical design advantages. Axial symmetry is more easily preserved in an axial structure. This is a frequent choice of geometry, e.g. the symmetry axis coinciding with the polarizing magnetic field and the mechanical structural axis of the magnet. In such geometry, the implementation of FIG. 3a is advantageous because the balanced nature of the circuit permits the circuit to be physically distributed along the symmetry axis of the magnet.
Shielded coaxial cables also minimize strong inductive couplings between, for example, the trap inductances L2.sup.(c) and L1.sup.(a) or L1.sup.(b). (See FIG. 2).
Although modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventor to embody within the patent all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4446431 *||Aug 24, 1981||May 1, 1984||Monsanto Company||Double-tuned single coil probe for nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer|
|US4594566 *||Aug 30, 1984||Jun 10, 1986||Advanced Nmr Systems, Inc.||High frequency rf coil for NMR device|
|US4641097 *||May 10, 1984||Feb 3, 1987||General Electrtic Company||Elliptical cross-section slotted-tube radio-frequency resonator for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging|
|US4641098 *||Mar 15, 1985||Feb 3, 1987||Doty Scientific, Inc.||Parallel single turn saddle resonator for nuclear magnetic resonance signal reception|
|US4720680 *||Feb 9, 1987||Jan 19, 1988||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Adjustable radio frequency coil for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging|
|US4725780 *||Oct 18, 1985||Feb 16, 1988||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||RF field generator and detector|
|US4737715 *||Feb 10, 1986||Apr 12, 1988||Jeol Ltd.||Coil system for nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer probe|
|US4740751 *||Aug 7, 1986||Apr 26, 1988||Picker International, Inc.||Whole body MRI resonator|
|US4752736 *||Jul 22, 1986||Jun 21, 1988||The Regents Of The University Of California||Center fed QD MRI RF coil|
|US4755756 *||Feb 12, 1987||Jul 5, 1988||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Radio frequency coil for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging|
|US4757290 *||Feb 6, 1987||Jul 12, 1988||Elscint Ltd.||Hybrid resonator|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4916418 *||Mar 31, 1989||Apr 10, 1990||Varian Associates, Inc.||Double tuned bird cage coil|
|US5036426 *||Feb 22, 1990||Jul 30, 1991||Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System||Method and apparatus for tuning and matching an NMR coil|
|US5162739 *||Apr 5, 1991||Nov 10, 1992||F. David Doty||Balanced multi-tuned high-power broadband coil for nmr|
|US5166621 *||Oct 26, 1990||Nov 24, 1992||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems Corporation||Multi-resonant nmr coils|
|US5412322 *||Jun 24, 1993||May 2, 1995||Wollin Ventures, Inc.||Apparatus and method for spatially ordered phase encoding and for determining complex permittivity in magnetic resonance by using superimposed time-varying electric fields|
|US6489768||Oct 23, 2000||Dec 3, 2002||Varian, Inc.||Superconductive networks to optimize multiply tuned NMR coils|
|US6933725 *||Jan 16, 2004||Aug 23, 2005||Bruker Biospin Corporation||NMR probe circuit for generating close frequency resonances|
|US7106061 *||Dec 14, 2004||Sep 12, 2006||Bruker Biospin Gmbh||Probe head for nuclear magnetic resonance measurements|
|US7196522 *||Jun 20, 2005||Mar 27, 2007||Bruker Biospin Sa (Societe Anonyme)||Power circuit of a coil and probe and NMR spectrometer comprising such a circuit|
|US20050156597 *||Jan 16, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Bruker Biospin Corporation||Nmr probe circuit for generating close frequency resonances|
|US20050168223 *||Dec 14, 2004||Aug 4, 2005||Bruker Biospin Gmph||Probe head for nuclear magnetic resonance measurements|
|US20050280418 *||Jun 20, 2005||Dec 22, 2005||Bruker Biospin Sa (Societe Anonyme)||Power circuit of a coil and probe and NMR spectrometer comprising such a circuit|
|DE10361347B4 *||Dec 16, 2003||Jan 19, 2012||Bruker Biospin Gmbh||Probenkopf für Kernresonanzmessungen|
|EP0518896A1 *||Feb 6, 1991||Dec 23, 1992||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems C||Series/parallel double-tuned nmr coils.|
|EP0518896A4 *||Feb 6, 1991||Dec 30, 1992||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems Corporation||Series/parallel double-tuned nmr coils|
|EP0522037A1 *||Mar 27, 1991||Jan 13, 1993||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems C||Double tuned nmr coils.|
|EP0522037A4 *||Mar 27, 1991||Mar 17, 1993||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems Corporation||Double tuned nmr coils|
|EP0579473A1 *||Jul 13, 1993||Jan 19, 1994||OTSUKA ELECTRONICS (U.S.A.) Inc.||Tunable RF probe for use in NMR spectroscopy experiments and method of tuning|
|WO1990012328A1 *||Feb 26, 1990||Oct 18, 1990||Spectroscopy Imaging Systems Corporation||Double tuned bird cage coil|
|WO1992017792A1 *||Apr 1, 1992||Oct 15, 1992||Doty Scientific, Inc.||Balanced multi-tuned high-power broadband coil for nmr|
|WO2003058283A1 *||Dec 31, 2002||Jul 17, 2003||The Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine||Mri tunable antenna and system|
|U.S. Classification||324/322, 333/219|
|International Classification||G01R33/32, G01R33/36, A61B5/055|
|Jun 20, 1988||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC., PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA A C
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:ZENS, ALBERT P.;REEL/FRAME:004893/0823
Effective date: 19880408
Owner name: VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ZENS, ALBERT P.;REEL/FRAME:004893/0823
Effective date: 19880408
|Oct 26, 1992||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 30, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Apr 8, 1999||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: VARIAN, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VARIAN ASSOCIATES, INC;REEL/FRAME:009901/0890
Effective date: 19990406
|Nov 22, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Dec 12, 2000||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|