|Publication number||US4878294 A|
|Application number||US 07/208,907|
|Publication date||Nov 7, 1989|
|Filing date||Jun 20, 1988|
|Priority date||Jun 20, 1988|
|Publication number||07208907, 208907, US 4878294 A, US 4878294A, US-A-4878294, US4878294 A, US4878294A|
|Inventors||William P. Dugan, Marvin R. Johnson|
|Original Assignee||General Dynamics Corp., Pomona Division|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Non-Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (15), Classifications (30), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention.
The present invention relates to microcircuitry test equipment and, more particularly, to probe test connections to chips after tape or bumped tape has been attached.
2. Description of the Related Art.
Many processes exist for the production of microcircuit test probes. For example, probes have been designed which are disposed over a recess, and the testing circuit is brought into contact by bending the probes into the recess. Probes have also been produced by bending metallic elements, as disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,702,439 to McGahey et al. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,832,632, Ardezzone has suggested a flexible coating over a probe head. Probes have also been embedded in flexible structures by processes such as those suggested in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,810,016 to Chayka et al and 3,835,381 to Garretson et al.
In the disclosed methods and structures, at least some bending is performed on the probe or a related metal structure, either during manufacture or during operation. Bending leads to fatigue and breakage, especially in the case of microcircuits, since the element to be bent is very fine. In addition, probes meant to be bent are relatively flat and are thus relatively weak.
Another method for the production of microcircuit probes includes welding of an aligned probe to a preformed base which has, integral in it, a flexible area. As disclosed by Best et al in IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 11 (April, 1973), the mandrel for the base is then removed to produce a flexible testing unit. The process requires microwelding or brazing.
In U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,338 to Dugan, a process is disclosed which improves on previous processes requiring microwelding or brazing by directly forming the probes in the proper angular relationship to the remainder of the unit. The disclosed method produces new and improved fine-line probes for connection to very fine circuits.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,125,310 discloses the fabrication of printed circuit contact terminations having a plurality of copper buttons covered with a very thin layer of gold plating. A plurality of these contacts, mounted on a wafer in opposed juxtaposition to a corresponding pattern of adjacent circuit contacts, is brought together with the other circuit terminations and pressure is applied sufficient to force-flow the gold layer to develop a gas-tight seal between the opposed surfaces. Such an arrangement lends itself to separation and re-sealing of the contact arrays, thereby providing a special purpose circuit connector.
Further improvements in processes in which probes are formed directly should have the desirable characteristics of (1) enabling reproduction of the probe section of a tester for microcircuits without great difficulty; (2) producing a tester that has relatively rigid probes which are manufactured independent of each other; (3) producing probes that are not easily bendable toward or away from each other; and (4) producing probes which do not break easily.
The desirable characteristics listed above are realized by an improved method of manufacturing fine-line probes for connection to microcircuits. A multiple coating method provides probe test connections on chips subsequent to attachment of tape or bumped tape to the chip. The process involves application of photoresist to both sides of a copper foil, electroforming copper posts onto selected areas of one side of the foil through image hole patterns in the photoresist of that side, stripping all of the remaining photoresist from the foil, laminating polyimide prepreg to the post side of the foil completely covering it, exposing the copper surface of the posts by a sanding operation, re-applying photoresist to both sides of the sanded remainder, electroforming a second copper probe coating on each post through appropriate image hole patterns in the post side of the resist, chemically milling the foil on the side opposite the posts so as to provide leads integral with each post by way of appropriate masking techniques, and, finally, removing all of the remaining photoresist to produce the desired unit.
In a second method in accordance with the present invention, processing of the copper foil proceeds simultaneously from both sides. Pattern images are developed from both sides of the copper sheet, the underside forming a plurality of image holes while the upper side forms a lead pattern. After the circuit leads and posts are built up by electroforming copper on to the exposed areas on both sides of the copper foil, a further electroplating step is formed to deposit a thin layer of nickel plate over the built up copper. This permits selective etching of the foil during the chemical milling step and saves substantial time in the process by combining some of the sequential steps of the first-mentioned method.
The electroforming steps in the present process are preferably performed by resort to a double-cell electroplating process disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 197,793 of William P. Dugan et al, assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
A better understanding of the present invention may be realized from a consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
FIGS. 1A-1M illustrate the steps performed in producing the probe structure of a first embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a bottom view of the probe shown in a cross sectional view in FIG. 1M;
FIG. 3 is a perspective drawing of a double-cell electroplating apparatus which may be used in the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a partially broken away side view of another embodiment of the double-cell electroplating apparatus of FIG. 3; and
FIGS. 5A-5L illustrate the steps performed in producing the probe structure of a second embodiment of the present invention.
FIGS. 1A-1M illustrate the individual sequential steps in a process for providing probe test connections on microcircuit chips according to one embodiment of the present invention. The probe test contacts fabricated by the process shown in FIGS. 1A-1M are illustrated in FIG. 2, which is a bottom view of the probe contacts shown in cross section in FIG. 1M.
The process of this embodiment begins with a copper foil sheet 12 which is 0.0014 inch thick. Sheet 12 is laminated with two layers of photoresist 14 and 16, each 0.0026 inch thick, on opposite sides of the copper foil sheet 12. These thin layers are taken from rolls and fed through a laminating machine, after which panels measuring 3 11 are cut out.
The photoresist 16 on one side of the panel is then exposed to a hole pattern image while the photoresist layer 14 on the other side of the panel is protected from exposure. After developing and washing, a pattern of holes 1 appears in the photoresist layer 16, as shown in FIG. 1C. The development step takes place in a "yellow room" while the layer 14 of photoresist is protected.
The electroforming of copper posts 20 in the holes 18 is effected by means of a novel double-cell electroplating apparatus and method disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 197,793 of William P. Dugan et al, assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The disclosure of that application is incorporated herein by reference. For better understanding of the present invention, a description of that novel electroplating apparatus and method follows.
FIG. 3 shows one possible arrangement of the novel double-cell electroplating apparatus which may be used in the present invention. A first cell 100 has an anode 110 situated therein and a second cell 120 has a cathode 130 placed in it. Cells 100 and 120 are filled with electrolytic solution 140 and 160 in amounts sufficient to contact the electrodes. A wide variety of electrolytic solutions are usable. External circuit connections have been omitted for simplicity.
An example of a suitable copper plating solution is:
CuSO4.52 O=70.166 grams/liter
H2 SO=184.643 grams/liter
FIG. 3 shows a pump/filter apparatus 200 which passes electrolyte from cell 100 to cell 120, thereby effectively continuously recirculating and mixing the electrolyte 140 and 160. The latter function is important because during the electroplating process gas is evolved at the cathode 130 which may become trapped on the surface of the object being plated, and this can cause uneven deposition. By agitating the electrolyte 160, bubbles of gas can be kept from collecting.
FIG. 3 further shows a tube 180 which connects cells 100 and 120 and performs as a siphon. The siphon tube 180 acts to return electrolyte from cell 120 to cell 100. While FIG. 3 reveals a single tube 180, multiple tubes could be used to achieve the same effect. It is important to note that what is being disclosed is not the mere use of a siphon, but rather a means of establishing a relatively high-resistance ion path between the two cells 100 and 120, cell 120 containing the cathode 130 and cell 100 containing the anode 110, via the siphon tube 180 and the path containing the pump/filter 200.
An additional function of the pump/filter apparatus 200 is to filter out anodal material, dirt, or other foreign matter present in the plating cells. It is desirable to filter the electrolytic solution to prevent roughness of the deposit due to extraneous materials in the solution. Since the anode 110 is the principal source of particulate material in the electrolyte, filtering the electrolyte as it is pumped from cell 100 to 120 effectively maintains the electrolyte 160 in which the cathode 130 is immersed clean and clear of impurities, thereby materially improving the quality of the plating layer on the cathode element. Although the use of a filter integral with the pump of apparatus 200 is one convenient way of achieving this end, the filtering device could be a separate element in series with apparatus 200. Similarly, a separate agitation means apart from the apparatus 200 could be used to agitate the electrolytic solution.
FIG. 4 is a partially broken away side view of another possible double-cell electroplating arrangement which can be used in the present invention. As before, a siphon tube 180 moves electrolyte from cathode cell 120 to cell 100 by siphoning action. Pump 210 pumps electrolyte from anode cell 100 to cell 120. In the arrangement of FIG. 4 a separate filtering means 220 and agitation means 240 are provided. Agitation means 240 takes the form of an additional pump 240 that circulates plating solution 160 through tubes 250 and 260. Intake tube 260 accepts electrolyte from the lower part of cell 120 which is pumped by agitation means 240 through tube 250 to a part of the solution where the object to be plated 280 is attached to cathode 130. Object 280 is surrounded by a plastic cathode shield 290. Cathode shield 290 consists of a plastic sleeve or envelope into which object 280 can be inserted in preparation for plating. A window 310 on one side of cathode shield 295 allows electrolyte 160 to reach object 280 when it is positioned in the center thereof.
An additional feature shown in the arrangement of FIG. 4 is the heater 300 situated in cell 100 to heat the electrolytic solution. The temperature of the electrolytic solution affects several of the factors in processes involved in electroplating, such as the solubility of metal salts and evolved gases and the rate at which chemical reactions take place.
The plating process used in the present invention was found in trials to proceed satisfactorily for a variety of different current densities. Particularly useful was an average current density of 20 amperes/ft2 which produced a plated layer incrementation of about 0.001 inch per hour. Excellent results are also realized with a current density of about 125 amperes/ft.2.
Continuing with the description of the first embodiment and following the electroforming of the copper posts 20 in the holes 18 of FIG. 1D, photoresist layers 14 and 16 are stripped from copper sheet 12 and copper posts 20 to give the result shown in FIG. 1E. Next a lamination of polyimide prepreg 22 is applied to the post side of the panel, as shown in FIG. 1F. The post side is then sanded until flat surfaces 24 of the posts 20 are exposed. The result is shown in FIG. 1G.
The next three steps in the process of fabrication are essentially identical to ones which were carried out earlier. First, both sides of the panel are laminated with layers of dry photoresist 26 and 28 which are each 0.0026 inch thick, as shown in FIG. 1H. Second, photoresist layer 28 is exposed to the identical hole pattern image used previously to expose photoresist layer 16. Photoresist layer 26 is protected from exposure during this step. Subsequent development of the hole pattern image results in the exposure of the sanded copper posts 24, as shown in FIG. 1I. Third, longer copper posts 32 are electroformed by again using the novel double-cell electroplating apparatus and method described above.
Now photoresist layer 26 is exposed to an image of a lead pattern. Development of the lead pattern image leaves a plurality of covered areas 34 corresponding to where the leads will be, as shown in FIG. 1K. Between areas 34 are openings 36 in which the original copper foil sheet is exposed.
A chemical milling step is now performed by allowing a chemical etchant, preferably ferric chloride, to etch through the copper foil sheet wherever the openings 36 exist. The electroformed copper posts 32 are, of course, protected from the etchant in this step by an added layer of photoresist 28. The result is shown in FIG. 1L, where leads 38 remain after the chemical milling is completed, each of the leads having a probe contact 32 on the under side.
The final step in the process is to remove all the remaining photoresist 28 and 34 to leave a pattern of leads 38 with connecting copper posts 32 extending through a layer of polyimide 22. This is illustrated in the sectional view of FIG. 1M. A bottom view of the resulting product shown in FIG. 1M is given in FIG. 2, which shows the finished probes 32 projecting through a transparent polyimide sheet 22 with copper leads 38 on the remote side and visible through the polyimide sheet.
The plurality of copper posts 32 constitute microcircuit probes positioned in the dielectric base of polyimide 22 having lead connections 38 on the other side of the base to which probe circuitry can be attached. The thickness of the original photoresist layers 16 and 28 determines the length of the probes 32, and the thickness of the photoresist layer on top of the polyimide layer 22 determines the maximum extent of protrusion of the probes 32 from the polyimide base layer 22 in the final product. The particular design and testing to be done with the probes will determine the values to be chosen for these thicknesses.
FIGS. 5A-5L illustrate the individual sequential steps in an alternative process for providing probe test connections for testing microcircuit chips according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The probe test contacts fabricated by the process depicted in FIGS. 5A-5L correspond to the illustration of FIG. 2
As indicated beginning with FIG. 5A, a copper foil sheet 42, 0.0014 inch thick, is laminated between two layers of photoresist 44 and 46, each being 0.0026 inch thick, in the manner already described.
Photoresist layers 44 and 46 on both sides of the panel are exposed simultaneously through respective lead pattern and hole pattern masks. After developing and washing, a pattern of image holes 48 appears on the underside of the copper sheet 42 while a circuit pattern having lead openings 56 on the upper side of the sheet 42 is present.
The panel of FIG. 5C is then placed in the electroplating apparatus (FIGS. 3 and 4) for electroforming to build up the copper posts 50 and circuit leads 52 as already described. After copper plating to the appropriate extent as indicated in FIG. 5D, the panel is washed and transferred to a sulfamate nickel plating solution in a similar double-cell electroplating apparatus. An example of a suitable nickel plating solution is:
Nickel sulfamate=75-100 grams/liter
Nickel chloride=10-15 grams/liter
Boric Acid=35-45 grams/liter
This is adjusted to develop a pH of 3.5 to 4.0 with a maximum surface tension of 35.0 dyne/cm. Nickel plating develops a thin layer on the exposed copper surfaces on both upper and lower sides of the panel as indicated in FIG. 5D.
The purpose of the thin nickel plated layer 53 (approximately 0.0001 inch) is to resist the etchant when the copper of the plated structure is selectively etched away. Nickel is not essential; any other metal which will permit the selective etching of copper may be utilized. In addition to permitting the selective etching of the copper layer in a later step, the nickel provides a protective layer for the copper leads and posts to resist oxidation of the copper surfaces in the finished probe product.
After the first nickel plating step to develop the configuration of FIG. 5D is completed, the photoresist layers 44 and 46 are stripped away, leaving the metal structure of FIG. 5E. Next the copper posts 50 on the underside of the sheet 42 are covered with a layer 58 of polyimide prepreg (FIG. 5F). The lower side of the panel is then sanded to leave a flat surface across the ends of the contact posts 50 which are flush with the surface of the polyimide prepreg 58. Additional dry film photoresist layers 60 and 61 are applied over the top and bottom surfaces of the FIG. 5G configuration as shown in FIG. 5H. These layers are applied from photoresist film tape and, in the case of the layer 61, bridge the leads 52. The lower side of the panel is next exposed to the identical hole pattern as before. After developing and washing, the pattern of holes 62 which is shown in FIG. 5I appears. The structure is again placed in the copper solution electroplating apparatus to further build up the contact posts 50, then in a nickel plating solution to add a layer of nickel 55 on the exposed surfaces of the copper posts 50. During this subsequent electroforming of the contact posts 50, the lead side is rendered inert by the film 61. Thereafter, the photoresist layers 60, 61 are stripped from the upper sides of the sheet 42. The circuit side of the structure is chemically milled by applying a suitable etchant such as sodium persulfate, after adding a layer of photoresist tape 64 along the underside, leaving the panel as shown in FIG. 5K. The posts 50 are protected from the etchant by the layer of resist 64. Finally photoresist layer 64 is removed, resulting in set of leads 52 with attached copper posts (probe contacts) 50 embedded in a sheet of polyimide 58 as shown in FIG. 5L results. Each of the top and bottom surfaces has a protective plated layer of nickel 53, 55 or some other suitable metal.
It will thus be seen that the method comprising the steps shown and described in connection with FIGS. 5A-5L provides an improved process for the fabrication of an improved contact probe configuration. The process of the second embodiment utilizes the steps of the first embodiment but combines some of the steps which are preformed sequentially in the first embodiment into simultaneous process steps in the second embodiment, thereby reducing the time required for the fabrication of a finished product and simplifying the fabrication process.
Furthermore, the provision of the added protective layers of nickel or some other suitable metal over the exposed surfaces of the copper leads and posts permits the combination of the process steps by enabling the selective etching of the copper foil and, in the finished product, provides added protection against oxidation of exposed copper surfaces.
Although there have been described above particular processes of manufacturing a microcircuit probe structure in accordance with the invention for the purpose of illustrating the manner in which the invention may be used to advantage, it will be appreciated that the invention is not limited thereto. Accordingly, any and all modifications, variations or equivalent arrangements which may occur to those skilled in the art should be considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the annexed claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2734150 *||Jan 12, 1950||Feb 7, 1956||Circuit component and method of making same|
|US2961746 *||Jun 18, 1956||Nov 29, 1960||Aladdin Ind Inc||Printed circuits|
|US3324014 *||Dec 3, 1962||Jun 6, 1967||United Carr Inc||Method for making flush metallic patterns|
|US3447960 *||Apr 11, 1966||Jun 3, 1969||Stephen A Tonozzi||Method of manufacturing printed circuit boards|
|US3462349 *||Sep 19, 1966||Aug 19, 1969||Hughes Aircraft Co||Method of forming metal contacts on electrical components|
|US3716907 *||Nov 20, 1970||Feb 20, 1973||Harris Intertype Corp||Method of fabrication of semiconductor device package|
|US3761309 *||Jun 30, 1971||Sep 25, 1973||Siemens Ag||Ctor components into housings method of producing soft solderable contacts for installing semicondu|
|US3901770 *||Jan 25, 1974||Aug 26, 1975||Siemens Ag||Method for the production of microscopically small metal or metal alloy structures|
|US3904461 *||Sep 9, 1974||Sep 9, 1975||Bendix Corp||Method of manufacturing solderable thin film microcircuit with stabilized resistive films|
|US3993515 *||Mar 31, 1975||Nov 23, 1976||Rca Corporation||Method of forming raised electrical contacts on a semiconductor device|
|US3997963 *||Apr 9, 1975||Dec 21, 1976||Ibm Corporation||Novel beam-lead integrated circuit structure and method for making the same including automatic registration of beam-leads with corresponding dielectric substrate leads|
|US4005472 *||May 19, 1975||Jan 25, 1977||National Semiconductor Corporation||Method for gold plating of metallic layers on semiconductive devices|
|US4067104 *||Feb 24, 1977||Jan 10, 1978||Rockwell International Corporation||Method of fabricating an array of flexible metallic interconnects for coupling microelectronics components|
|US4125310 *||Dec 1, 1975||Nov 14, 1978||Hughes Aircraft Co||Electrical connector assembly utilizing wafers for connecting electrical cables|
|US4125441 *||Jan 30, 1978||Nov 14, 1978||General Dynamics Corporation||Isolated bump circuitry on tape utilizing electroforming|
|US4139434 *||Jan 30, 1978||Feb 13, 1979||General Dynamics Corporation||Method of making circuitry with bump contacts|
|US4141782 *||Jan 30, 1978||Feb 27, 1979||General Dynamics Corporation||Bump circuits on tape utilizing chemical milling|
|US4221047 *||Mar 23, 1979||Sep 9, 1980||International Business Machines Corporation||Multilayered glass-ceramic substrate for mounting of semiconductor device|
|US4236777 *||Jul 27, 1979||Dec 2, 1980||Amp Incorporated||Integrated circuit package and manufacturing method|
|US4293637 *||Oct 5, 1979||Oct 6, 1981||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method of making metal electrode of semiconductor device|
|US4334349 *||Jun 3, 1980||Jun 15, 1982||Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Method of producing semiconductor device|
|US4649338 *||Jun 21, 1982||Mar 10, 1987||General Dynamics, Pomona Division||Fine line circuitry probes and method of manufacture|
|1||*||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 11, No. 5, Oct. 1968, p. 506.|
|2||*||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 21 No. 6, Nov. 1978, pp. 2553 2554.|
|3||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 21 No. 6, Nov. 1978, pp. 2553-2554.|
|4||*||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 22, No. 5, Oct., 1979, pp. 1821 1822.|
|5||IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 22, No. 5, Oct., 1979, pp. 1821-1822.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4968589 *||Oct 26, 1988||Nov 6, 1990||General Signal Corporation||Probe card for integrated circuit chip and method of making probe card|
|US5027062 *||Jun 12, 1989||Jun 25, 1991||General Dynamics Corporation, Air Defense Systems Division||Electroformed chemically milled probes for chip testing|
|US5188702 *||Apr 23, 1992||Feb 23, 1993||Nitto Denko Corporation||Process for producing an anisotropic conductive film|
|US5354205 *||Apr 23, 1993||Oct 11, 1994||Hughes Aircraft Company||Electrical connections with shaped contacts|
|US6356002||Feb 8, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||Northrop Grumman Corporation||Electrical slip ring having a higher circuit density|
|US6469394||Jan 31, 2000||Oct 22, 2002||Fujitsu Limited||Conductive interconnect structures and methods for forming conductive interconnect structures|
|US6502298||Jan 18, 2000||Jan 7, 2003||Litton Systems, Inc.||Method of electroforming a slip ring|
|US6984915||Jan 22, 2003||Jan 10, 2006||Electro-Tec Corp.||Electrical slip ring platter multilayer printed circuit board and method for making same|
|US7151385 *||Jan 22, 2002||Dec 19, 2006||Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd.||Contact probe, method of manufacturing the contact probe, and device and method for inspection|
|US20040075454 *||Jan 22, 2002||Apr 22, 2004||Yoshihiro Hirata||Contact probe, method of manufacturing the contact probe, and device and method for inspection|
|CN101261296B||Nov 21, 2007||Apr 27, 2011||台湾积体电路制造股份有限公司||Semiconductor element test structure|
|EP0529577A2 *||Aug 25, 1992||Mar 3, 1993||Hughes Aircraft Company||Electrical test probe having shaped contacts|
|EP0529577A3 *||Aug 25, 1992||Aug 4, 1993||Hughes Aircraft Company||Electrical connections with shaped contacts|
|EP1026794A2 *||Feb 7, 2000||Aug 9, 2000||Litton Systems, Inc.||Electrical slip ring having a higher circuit density|
|EP1026794A3 *||Feb 7, 2000||Sep 5, 2001||Litton Systems, Inc.||Electrical slip ring having a higher circuit density|
|U.S. Classification||29/852, 205/78, 205/122|
|International Classification||H05K3/46, H05K3/42, H05K3/20, H05K3/06, G01R1/073, H05K3/40, G01R1/067|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T29/49165, H05K3/064, H05K3/423, H05K3/062, H05K3/4007, H05K3/4647, H05K2201/0361, H05K3/205, H05K2201/09481, H05K2203/1476, H05K2201/0367, H05K2201/0347, H05K2201/09563, H05K2201/0355, G01R3/00, G01R1/06711, G01R1/07314|
|European Classification||G01R1/067C, H05K3/40B, G01R1/073|
|Jun 20, 1988||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, POMONA, CA, A CORP.
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:DUGAN, WILLIAM P.;JOHNSON, MARVIN R.;REEL/FRAME:004904/0881;SIGNING DATES FROM 19880603 TO 19880610
Owner name: GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, A CORP. OF DE, CALIF
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DUGAN, WILLIAM P.;JOHNSON, MARVIN R.;SIGNING DATES FROM 19880603 TO 19880610;REEL/FRAME:004904/0881
|Oct 23, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: HUGHES MISSILE SYSTEMS COMPANY, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:006279/0578
Effective date: 19920820
|Jun 8, 1993||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Nov 7, 1993||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jan 18, 1994||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19891107