|Publication number||US4895745 A|
|Application number||US 07/314,227|
|Publication date||Jan 23, 1990|
|Filing date||Feb 21, 1989|
|Priority date||Jan 2, 1987|
|Publication number||07314227, 314227, US 4895745 A, US 4895745A, US-A-4895745, US4895745 A, US4895745A|
|Inventors||George F. Vesley, Jurgen Klingen|
|Original Assignee||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (45), Classifications (18), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/000,241 filed 01/02/87, now abandoned.
The present invention concerns the same problem as that to which U.S. Pat. No. 4,612,242 (Vesley et al.) is directed. Teachings in that patent about microbubbles and about pressure-sensitive adhesives and their photopolymerization are incorporated here by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention concerns pressure-sensitive adhesive tape, especially one having a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer which is foamlike by virtue of microbubbles as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,223,067 (Levens).
2. Description of the Related Art
Foam-backed pressure-sensitive adhesive tape is commonly used to adhere an article to a substrate. The foam backings of such tapes often are pigmented with carbon black to afford a dark appearance that camouflages their presence.
The pressure-sensitive adhesive tape of the above-cited Levens patent has a foamlike appearance and character, even though it is not a foam, and is useful for porposes previously requiring a foam backed pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. A foamlike tape of the Levens patent now on the market is made by ultraviolet polymerization of a layer of an adhesive-forming mixture containing colorless glass microbubbles which act as a white pigment that makes the tape undesirably visible in uses such as sealing a skylight or attaching body-side moldings to automotive vehicles or simulated mullion bars to glass windows. Because of its superior performance characteristics, the foamlike tape of the Levens patent is often preferred to foam-backed tapes for such purposes and would be more acceptable if its adhesive layer were sufficiently dark to camouflage the tape. If carbon black or other pigment were added to the photopolymerizable adhesive-forming mixture in amounts sufficient to produce a desirably dark appearance, this would block the ultraviolet radiation from polymerizing the mixture to a pressure-sensitive adhesive state. Up to about 0.06 percent by weight of carbon black can be employed without undue interference with the polymerization of a 1.0-mm layer (as evidenced by adhesive and cohesive values), but such small amounts produce only a pastel grey color that would be undesirably noticeable for uses such as those mentioned above. When other pigments are substituted for the carbon black, they also cannot be used in amounts producing a color deeper than pastel.
Although the microbubbles of the Levens patent examples are glass, they can be polymeric of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,651,972 (Morehouse et al.) or U.S. Pat. No. 4,287,308 (Nakayama et al.) Because these polymeric microbubbles are smaller in size and less dense than are commercially available glass microbubbles, a greater number of the polymeric microbubbles is required to attain the same volume loading. Hence, pigmented Levens-type tapes tend to be even lighter colored when filled with polymeric microbubbles than when filled with glass microbubbles.
Also useful for purposes previously requiring a foam-backed pressure-sensitive adhesive tape is the celluar pressure-sensitive adhesive tape disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,615 (Esmay et al.). It preferably is made by polymerizing a coated froth in situ by exposure to ultraviolet radiation. Although the use of pigments is suggested (col. 5, lines 48-57), the ultraviolet radiation would be blocked if the froth contained appreciable amounts of carbon black or other pigment.
3. Other Prior Art
Since at least as early as 1941, finely divided silica has been used for the thickening of liquids, usually in a hydrophilic form, but also in hydrophobic form. See, for example, "Technical Bulletin Pigments" No. 6 of Degussa Corp., Teterboro, N.J., dated March 1981, the cover of which shows the schematic structure of a hydrophobic silica. Another Degussa bulletin, "Precipitated Silicas and Silicates" dated Dec. 1978, lists a number of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silicas and gives uses for specific silica products. A 4-page Degussa bulletin entitled "Product Information" marked "PL/sk 6/4/84", indicating the date June 4, 1984, reports that the hydrophobic silica "Aerosil" 972 is made from "Aerosil" 130, a hydrophilic silica which has a surface area of 130 m2 /g; the hydrophobic silica "Aerosil" R974 is made from "Aerosil" 200, a hydrophilic silica which has a surface area of 200 m2 /g; and the hydrophobic silica "Aerosil" R976 is made from "Aerosil" 300, a hydrophilic silica which has a surface area of 300 m2 /g. Because the finer silicas are more difficult to treat, more free hydroxyls remain on the surfaces of the finer silicas, namely 30%, 40%, and 50% on the hydrophobic R972, R974, R976, respectively.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,024,146 (Bueche et al.) concerns a certain silicone rubber composition which contains a hydrophobic silica, specifically a trialkylhalogenosilane-treated silica aerogel, and provides adhesive bonds that better resist repeated freezing and thawing in the presence of water. If one instead employs a silica which has been treated to become hydrophobic by forming silicon-bonded alkoxy groups on the surface of the silica particles, "one will not obtain the same properties or results" (col. 3, lines 26-33). While the adhesives of the examples are pastes, they also can be used as "pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes" (col. 6, lines 10-15, and col. 5, lines 59-70).
No other mention has been found in the prior art concerning the use of hydrophobic silica in pressure-sensitive adhesive tape. The above-cited Levens and Esmay patents employ "fumed silica" in the pressure-sensitive adhesives of their tapes, but "fumed silica" as produced is hydrophilic.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,163,091 (Schulz) teaches that fume(d) silica is a reinforcing filler in certain self-adhesive silicone elastomers, and that the silica "can IO be treated with organosilicon materials such as chlorosilanes, silazanes, alkoxysilanes and cyclic siloxanes to produce hydrophobic surfaces" (col. 6, line 7-52).
The invention provides a pressure-sensitive adhesive tape which can be foamlike as in the above-cited Levens patent, or can have a celluar pressure-sensitive layer like that of the above-cited Esmay patent, and yet can present a sufficiently dark or intensely colored appearance to meet the needs mentioned above. In spite of that dark or colored appearance, these tapes can be produced by photopolymerization and can have adhesive and cohesive properties equal to those of the examples of the Levens and Esmay patents.
The invention also provides a pressure-sensitive adhesive tape wherein the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is a thin, dense, microbubble-free layer, preferably supported by a flexible carrier that has a release surface from which the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer can be transferred. This microbubble-free pressure-sensitive adhesive layer can be transferred either to a microbubble-filled pressure-sensitive adhesive layer or a celluar pressure-sensitive adhesive layer to provide a pressure-sensitive adhesive composite.
Briefly, the novel pressure-sensitive adhesive tape comprises a flexible support carrying a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer in which is dispersed a pigment or dye plus hydrophobic silica in an amount comprising by weight at least 2 parts per hundred resin (phr), the hydrophobic silica having a surface area of at least 10 m2 /g. Preferably, the surface area of the hydrophobic silica is from 50 to 400 m2 /g (B.E T. surface area). As compared to a tape which is identical except for omission of the hydrophobic silica, the novel tape is noticeably darker and more intensely colored. This effect is observed regardless of whether or not the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer of the tape is foamlike, celluar, or dense and microbubble-free. This effect is surprising in view of the fact that hydrophobic silica by itself is white. It also is surprising that the novel tapes exhibit better adhesive and cohesive properties than do otherwise identical tapes containing no silica. Another surprise is that comparable darkening is not achieved when hydrophilic silica is substituted for the hydrophobic silica.
A dark-appearing pressure-sensitive adhesive tape of the invention can be made by the steps of
(1) preparing a blend of (i) monomers which are photopolymerizable to a pressure-sensitive adhesive state, and (ii) a pigment or dye plus hydrophobic silica having a surface area of at least 10 m2 /g and in an amount comprising by weight at least 2 phr,
(2) coating the blend onto a carrier, and
(3) subjecting the coating to ultraviolet radiation to photopolymerize the monomers to pressure-sensitive adhesive state.
Preferably the carrier used in step (2) has a low-adhesion or release surface to permit the resulting pressure-sensitive adhesive layer to be used for such purposes as adhering body side molding to automotive vehicles.
When the coating of step (2) is rather thick (e.g., from 0.5 mm to 1.5 mm in thickness), the necessity of allowing the ultraviolet radiation to penetrate fully makes it impossible to attain colors as dark or intense as might be desired for many purposes In such event, it may be desirable to cover the resulting pressure-sensitive adhesive layer with a relatively thin layer of pressure-sensitive adhesive which preferably has a higher pigment content. When the same pigment or dye is used in both the thin covering and relatively thick under layers, the broad face of the covering layer of the composite tape has a more Intense color than does the face of either layer by itself. Furthermore, the edge of the composite tape appears to present a color which is surprisingly more intense than does the edge of the under layer by itself.
For example, a tape useful for mounting a brake light on the rear window of an automobile may have a grey foamlike pressure-sensitive adhesive core 1 mm in thickness and a black pressure-sensitive adhesive surface layer 0.05 mm in thickness, and after the brake light has been so mounted, the entire pressure-sensitive adhesive composite can have a black appearance.
In the current state of the art, photopolymerization preferably is carried out in an inert atmosphere such as nitrogen. An inert atmosphere can be achieved by temporarily covering the photopolymerizable coating with a plastic film which is transparent to ultraviolet radiation and irradiating through that film in air. If the polymerizable coating is not covered during photopolymerization, the permissible oxygen content of the inert atmosphere can be increased by mixing into the photopolymerizable composition an oxidizable tin compound as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,303,485 (Levens), which also teaches that by doing so, thick coatings can be polymerized in air.
A mixture of unpolymerized monomers tends to have such low viscosity that it cannot be coated uniformly at typical thicknesses and so should be partially polymerized to a syrup of coatable viscosity. Preferably, this is done before adding the hydrophobic silica, because the silica is dispersed faster and more easily into a mixture of coatable viscosity. Higher cohesive strengths at 70° C. and better adhesion have been attained at 4-8 parts hydrophobic silica per 100 parts syrup (referred to as "4-8 phr") than at only 2 phr. When the amount of the hydrophobic silica has exceeded 8 phr, it has been necessary to employ a high-shear mixer such as a paint mill to attain uniform dispersions. By doing so useful dispersions have been attained at loadings as high as 15 phr. When the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is to contain microbubbles, they preferably are added after the hydrophobic silica has been dispersed, because they might be broken in a high-shear mixer.
Tapes of the invention which have been photopolymerized exhibit substantially increased cohesive strengths and adhesion after a period of dwell. This is important for repositioning tapes, but within a few days they normally cannot be removed.
When the pressure-sensitive adhesive layer of the novel tape incorporates microbubbles and is to be photopolymerized, the pigment or dye and the hydrophobic silica are more readily dispersed into the photopolymerizable syrup if added before the microbubbles. The amount of pigment or dye that can be used when microbubbles are to be added to the photopolymerizable syrup is less than when microbubbles are not used, because of the light-scattering effect of the microbubbles. However, larger amounts of pigment or dye can be used than could be used in an identical syrup containing no hydrophobic silica, because the presence of the silica partially offsets the reduction in adhesive and cohesive values due to light-blocking effect of the pigment or dye. Tests indicate that a photopolymerized tape of the invention having a 1.0-mm pressure-sensitive adhesive layer containing microbubbles (average diameter 60 micrometers) can comprise from 0.08 to 0.1% carbon black and exhibit adhesive and cohesive values equivalent to those of an identical tape except containing only 0.06% carbon black and no hydrophobic silica. When the adhesive layer is thinner, larger amounts of pigment or dye can be used. When the microbubbles are of smaller average diameter, it may be necessary to reduce the amount of pigment or dye to maintain good adhesive and cohesive values in a photopolymerized tape of the invention.
While carbon black is preferred when a black color is desired, any pigment or dye of any color should be useful in making tapes of the invention.
Instead of being photopolymerized, tapes of the invention can be made by solution or emulsion polymerization. However, to attain optimum adhesive and cohesive properties, the hydrophobic silica should be added before the polymerization. Because of this, it is presumed that the hydrophobic silica is entering into some sort of interaction (physical or chemical) with monomers during polymerization, although the mechanism is not understood.
The pressure-sensitive adhesive preferably is an "acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive" comprising at least one copolymer of monomers comprising (a) a major proportion of acrylic acid ester of nontertiary alkyl alcohol, the molecules of which have from 1 to 14 carbon atoms and (b) a minor proportion of at least one copolymerizable monomer having a polar group. When at least a major proportion of said molecules have a carbon-to-carbon chain of 4-12 carbon atoms terminating at the hydroxyl oxygen atom and said chain contains at least about one-half the total number of carbon atoms in the molecule, the copolymer is tacky at ordinary room temperature, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. Re. 24,906 (Ulrich). However, the term "acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive" also encompasses adhesives which are not tacky at room temperatures but become tacky only at elevated temperatures, e.g., acrylic copolymers as described above except that a major proportion of the molecules of monomer (a) have a carbon-to-carbon chain substantially shorter than 4 carbon atoms. The substitution of a methacrylic acid ester for a significant portion of monomer (a) can produce the same result.
Suitable coplymerizable monomers having a polar group include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, itaconic acid, maleic anhydride, acrylamide, and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone. Of these copolymerizable monomers, those having carboxyl groups provide superior cohesive strength and also excellent adhesion to metallic surfaces, but not nearly as good adhesion to low-energy surfaces as does N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone, as is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,364,972 (Moon).
The pressure-sensitive adhesive tape of the invention may have a thick core comprising pressure-sensitive adhesive filled with microbubbles and one or two relatively thin surface layers which are free from microbubbles. Preferably both the core and surface layers of such a composite contain a pigment or dye plus hydrophobic silica. A surface layer of such a composite can be polymerized from solution or emulsion, but its core layer preferably is photopolymerized. Preferably the core layer of such a pressure-sensitive adhesive composite has a thickness from 0.25 to 1.5 mm (typically about 1.0 mm), and each microbubble-free surface layer has a thickness from 0.0125 to 0.25 mm (typically about 0.03 mm).
When a pressure-sensitive adhesive of a tape of the invention has a two layers, one layer comprising copolymer of acrylic acid ester and a carboxyl-containing monomer and the other comprising a copolymer of acrylic acid esters and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone monomer, the latter layer of the composite forms strong bonds to low-energy surfaces and the former layer forms strong bonds to high-energy surfaces. When the two layers are formed by simultaneously photopolymerizing two coatings of such monomer mixtures, it is impossible to delaminate the resulting pressure-sensitive adhesive.
To attain high cohesive strengths (as measured either by static shear values at elevated temperatures or by T-Peel at room temperature), the pressure-sensitive adhesive of the novel tape should be crosslinked. preferred crosslinking agents for an acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive are multiacrylates such as hexanediol diacrylate. Crosslinking is especially easy to control when photopolymerizing the monomer in admixture with a crosslinking agent taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,330,590 (Vesley) and 4,329,384 (Vesley et al.).
When hydrophilic silica has been substituted for hydrophobic silica, less or no improvement has been noted. Furthermore, the use of hydrophilic silica tends to increase significantly the viscosity of the prepolymer compositions, and the consequent higher-shear mixing may be less suitable for large-scale production. Upon adding hydrophilic silica to a composition which is polymerizable to a pressure-sensitive adhesive state, there is a rapid increase in viscosity which greatly limits the coatability of the composition. While the increase in viscosity would limit the amounts of hydrophilic silica to not more than about 2 phr, the addition of up to 6 phr hydrophobic silica produces no significant increase in viscosity.
The following tests may be used to evaluate tapes of the invention.
A strip of tape 1.27 cm in width is adhered by its adhesive to a flat, rigid stainless steel plate with an exactly 1.27-cm length of tape in contact with the panel. Before testing, a 1000-g weight rests over the bonded area for 15 minutes. Then the panel with the adhered tape is placed in an air-circulating oven which has been preheated to 70° C., and after 15 minutes, a 500-g weight is hung from the free end of the tape, with the panel tilted 2° from the vertical to insure against any peel forces. The time at which the weight falls is the "Static Shear Value at 70° C.". If no failure, the test is discontinued at 10,000 minutes.
T-peel is measured as in ASTM D-1876-72 except that the test tapes were 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) in width and were tested only two hours after being adhered to aluminum foil backings. Results are reported in Newtons per decimeter (N/dm). Only cohesive failures are reported.
T-peel provides a quantitative value of cohesive strength and is less sensitive to differences in the adhesion of the pressure-sensitive adhesive to the test surface.
The adhesive layer to be tested is slit to a width of 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) and is self-adhered to a clean smooth stainless steel plate. A 0.5-inch wide strip of pressure-sensitive adhesive on a nonstretchable backing is laid onto the adhesive layer to be tested. This composite is subjected to the weight of a 5.58-kg hard rubber-covered steel roller, 3 passes in each direction. After dwelling at 23° C. for one hour (or 72 hours where indicated), the "180° Peel" is measured by moving the free end of the tape away from the steel plate a rate of about 0.5 cm per second (using a tensile tester).
The adhesive layer to be tested is slit to a width of 0.5 inch (1.27 cm) and self adhered to a clean smooth stainless steel plate. A 0.5-inch wide strip of aluminu foil is adhered to the exposed face of the adhesive layer under the weight of a 5.58-kg hard rubber-covered steel roller, 1 pass in each direction. After dwelling at 23° C. for 20 minutes, (or 72 hours where indicated), the "90° Peel" is measured by moving the free end of the tape away from the steel plate a rate of about 0.5 cm per second (using a tensile tester).
The darkness of a pressure-sensitive adhesive layer is determined on a Hunter LabScan Spectrocolorimeter using a 10° reflectance, Illum=D65 and the CIE lab scale L* a* b*) where L*=0 for black and L*=100 for white. Since a* and b* for black samples are usually between =5 and +5, they are not reported unless one of them is outside of that range.
Three carbon black pigments have been used. Pigment A is 27% solids dispersed in phenoxy ethyl acrylate and is a mixture of two carbon blacks having respective average diameters of 27 and 62 nanometers. Pigment B is 50 nanometers in average diameter particle size and dispersed in binder and volatile solvent (28.5% solids). Pigment C is 75 nanometers in average diameter particle size and dispersed in a 2000 molecular weight diol (20% solids).
In the following examples, parts are given by weight. The glass microbubbles used in Examples A-E and G-K had a true density of 0.15 g/cm3 and were 20-150 micrometers in diameter (average 55 micrometers).
A syrup of coatable viscosity was prepared by partially photopolymerizing, as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,330,590 (Vesley), a mixture of 87.5 parts isooctyl acrylate, 12.5 parts acrylic acid, and 0.04 part of 2,2-dimethyl-2-phenyl acetophenone ("Irgacure" 651). To each aliquot of this syrup was added an additional 0.1 part of "Irgacure" 651, 0.05 part of hexanedioldiacrylate, 7 parts of glass microbubbles, 4 parts of hydrophobic silica (Degussa "Aerosil" 972), and an amount of Pigment A. Each of the resulting mixtures was thoroughly mixed slowly with an air stirrer and carefully degassed in a desiccator using a vacuum pump. The glass microbubbles comprised about 33% by volume of each mixture.
Each mixture was fed into the nip of a knife coater between a pair of transparent, biaxially oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate) films, the facing surfaces of which had low-adhesion coatings. The knife coater was adjusted to provide a coating thickness of approximately 0.10 to 0.12 mm. The composite emerging from the knife coater was irradiated with a bank of fluorescent lamps, 90% of the emissions of which were between 300 and 400 nm with a maximum at 351 nm. The exposure was measured by a Dynachem Radiometer which is spectrally responsive between 300 and 400 nm, maximum 350 nm. Each side of the coating was exposed to a total radiation of 400-410 millijoules. This total does not include the irradiation adsorbed by the poly(ethylene terephthalate) films. The composite was cooled by blowing air against both films during the irradiation to keep the temperature of the film below 85° C. to avoid wrinkling of the films. The resulting pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes are called Tapes 1-7 in Table I. To provide 0.034 part of carbon black in Tape 1, 0.125 part of Pigment A was used.
A series of comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes were prepared as in Example A except omitting the hydrophobic silica from each aliquot. The resulting tapes are called Tapes 1C-7C in Table I.
Another comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive tape was prepared as in Example A, duplicating Tape 1 except for omitting the carbon black, and called Tape 1O in Table I. Another comparative tape duplicated Tape 1 except omitting both the carbon black and the hydrophobic silica and is called Tape 1-X.
TABLE I__________________________________________________________________________CARBON 180°TAPE BLACK DARKNESS T-PEEL PEELNO. (phr) L* COLOR (N/dm) (N/dm)__________________________________________________________________________1 0.034 43 GREY 383 1642 0.06 34 GREY 383 2193 0.07 32 DARK GREY 361 1834 0.08 30 DARK GREY 346 1995 0.10 26 DARK GREY 295 1796 0.12 23 DARK GREY 254 1167 0.16 19 BLACK 249 1291-C 0.034 48 GREY 350 1492-C 0.06 38 GREY 324 1823-C 0.07 36 DARK GREY 324 1584-C 0.08 31 DARK GREY 280 1735-C 0.10 28 DARK GREY 252 1826-C 0.12 26 DARK GREY 219 1427-C 0.16 25 BLACK 208 1051-O 0 93 WHITE 438 1711-X 0 94 WHITE 372 153__________________________________________________________________________
Each of Tapes No. 7 and 7-C had a Static Shear Value at 70° C. greater than 10,000 minutes.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tapes 8-12 were made as in Example A except that to each aliquot of the syrup was added 0.07 phr of the carbon black, and the amount of the hydrophobic silica was as indicated in Table II. Also, the hydrophobic silica was dispersed in each aliquot of syrup before adding the glass microbubbles.
Comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 8-C is identical to Tape 8 except for omission of the hydrophobic silica.
Testing of Tapes 8-12 and 8-C as reported in Table II include 180° Peel after 72 hours dwell.
TABLE II__________________________________________________________________________ 180° PEEL HYDROPHOBIC 180° AFTERTAPE SILICA DARKNESS T-PEEL PEEL 72 HRSNO. (phr) L* COLOR (N/dm) (N/dm) (N/dm)__________________________________________________________________________8 1 34 DARK GREY 333 140 2189 2 33 DARK GREY 337 149 27910 4 32 DARK GREY 361 133 29611 8 31 DARK GREY 403 193 31212 12 29 DARK GREY 416 190 348 8-C 0 36 DARK GREY 324 158 218__________________________________________________________________________
Each of the tapes of Table II had a Static Shear Value at 70° C. greater than 10,000 minutes.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 13 was made as in Example A except that Pigment A was replaced by 0.04 phr Pigment B.
Comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 13-C was identical to Tape 13 except omitting the hydrophobic silica. Test results are in Table III.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 14 was made as in Example A except that Pigment A was replaced by 0.07 phr of Pigment C.
Comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 14-C was identical to Tape 14 except omitting the hydrophobic silica. In the test results shown in Table III, the T-Peel and 180° Peel for both Tape 14 and Tape 14-C were somewhat lower than is normally desired due to reduced transmission of the ultraviolet radiation resulting from the darker color obtained with Pigment C as compared to Pigment A. Hence, this carbon black preferably is not used in amounts exceedin 0.05 phr.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tapes 15-17 were made as in Example A except substituting the following pigments or dye for the carbon black.
______________________________________Tape______________________________________15 Quinacridone violet, 0.93 phr of a 15% dispersion of the pigment in isobornyl acrylate16 Crystal violet dye, 0.11 phr17 "L13-LB Suncure" blue base (Sun Chemical Corp.), 0.5 phr______________________________________
Comparative pressure-sensitive adhesive Tapes 15-C, 16-C, and 17-C were identical to Tapes 15-17, respectively, except omitting the hydrophobic silica. See Table III.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 18 was made as in Example A except using 0.034 phr of carbon black and replacing the colorless glass microbubbles with stained glass microbubbles made from a glass containing 12.8% CoCO3. The microbubbles had a true density of 0.26 g/cm3 and had light blue color.
Comparative Tape 18-C was identical except omitting hydrophobic silica. Test results are in Table III.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 19 was identical to Tape 3 of Example A except that the syrup was made from 30 parts of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone and 70 parts of isooctyl acrylate monomers. Comparative Tape 19-C was identical to Tape 19 except omitting the hydrophobic silica. See Table III.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 20 was made from a syrup prepared as in Example A. After adding 0.07 phr of the carbon black, 4 phr of the hydrophobic silica, and 7 phr of the glass microbubbles, the mixture was employed to provide a celluar pressure-sensitive adhesive membrane as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,615 (Esmay et al.), Typical Tape Making Procedure, column 6, line 31. A 2:1 ratio of Surfactants C and D described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,415,615 were used to froth the syrup. The frothed syrup was coated and polymerized as described in Example A herein above to provide a celluar pressure-sensitive adhesive membrane having a thickness of 1.0 mm.
TABLE III______________________________________PIG-MENT 180°DYE DARKNESS T-PEEL PEELTAPE (phr) L* a* b* COLOR (N/dm) (N/dm)______________________________________13 0.04 34 DK GREY 342 17413-C 0.04 38 DK GREY 290 15314 0.07 27 BLACK 260 10514-C 0.07 30 BLACK 223 10315 0.14 39 39 7 RED 278 18215-C 0.14 41 37 7 RED 267 13116 0.11 16 41 50 VIOLET 394 13116-C 0.11 18 41 50 VIOLET 304 16217 0.5 28 10 -40 BLUE 374 18217-C 0.5 34 6 -34 BLUE NT NT18 0.034 26 1 -11 DK BLUE 333 15318-C 0.034 30 2 -15 DK BLUE 276 14919 0.07 34 DK GREY 503 17119-C 0.07 36 DK GREY 427 17320 0.07 35 DK GREY 160 105______________________________________ NT = not tested
Each of the tapes of Table III had a Static Shear Value of 70° C. greater than 10,000 minutes.
A series of Tapes 21-25 were made as described in Example A, Tape 3, except different hydrophobic silicas were used and comparative examples were not made. The hydrophobic silicas were:
__________________________________________________________________________ ESTIMATED SURFACE HYDROPHOBIC AREA HYDROPHOBICITY TREATMENT (m2 /g) (%)__________________________________________________________________________"Aerosil" 972 Dimethyl dichlorosilane 110 70"Aerosil" 974 Dimethyl dichlorosilane 180 60"Cab-O-Sil" N70-TS Poly(dimethyl siloxane) 100"Sipernat" D17 Dimethyl dichlorosilane 110 70__________________________________________________________________________
Each of these was converted from fumed silica except "Sipernat" D17 (a product of Degussa), which was converted from precipitated hydrophilic silica.
TABLE IV______________________________________ 180°TAPE HYDROPHOBIC DARKNESS T-PEEL PEELNO. SILICA (phr) L* (N/dm) (N/dm)______________________________________21 "972" 2 33 327 14822 "972" 4 32 342 18323 "974" 4 33 352 18424 "N70" 4 34 317 17425 "D17" 4 35 341 175______________________________________
Microbubble-free pressure-sensitive adhesive Tapes 26-29 were prepared from a partially polymerized syrup of 87.5 parts isooctyl acrylate and 12.5 parts acrylic acid to which had been added 0.1 part of "Irgacure" and 0.15 part of the Photoactive s-triazine B described in (Vesley) U.S. Pat. No. 4,330,590. After adding a pigment or dye (as indicated below) to aliquots of the syrup and mixing with an air stirrer, 0.4 phr of hydrophobic silica ("Aerosil" 972) was added and mixed with an air stirrer. Using a conventional knife coater, each mixture was coated between biaxially oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate) films the surfaces of which had low-adhesion coatings, and then irradiated with lamps as described in Example A. The thickness of each of the resulting dense pressure-sensitive adhesive layers was 0.05 mm.
______________________________________ PIGMENTTAPE OR DYE (phr)______________________________________26 Quinacridone violet 0.1427 Pigment A 0.0728 "Suncure" LB 0.529 Crystal violet dye 0.11______________________________________
Testing of Tables 26-29 (and comparative tapes omitting the silica) is reported in Table V.
TABLE V______________________________________ DARKNESSTAPE L* a* b*______________________________________26 46 43 -1726-C 50 28 -1527 4527-C 4828 36 11 -5828-C 42 5 -4929 27 50 -6929-C 32 42 -66______________________________________
A thin, dense, microbubble-free pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 30 was made by dispersing pigment in a 17% solution in toluene-isopropanol of a copolymer of 90 parts of isooctyl acrylate and 10 parts of acrylic acid and mixing in 0.32 part of Pigment A carbon black and then 4 parts of hydrophobic silica ("Aerosil" 972) with an air stirrer. The mixture was coated 0.35-mm thick using a conventional knife coater on a paper backing, the surface of which had a low-adhesion coating. The solvent was removed by heating the coated film in an oven at 70° C. for 10 minutes, resulting in a dried pressure-sensitive adhesive layer 0.05 mm in thickness.
Tape 31 was made in the same way except replacing the carbon black with 0.2 phr of PDI yellow pigment #3277.
Control Tapes 30-C and 31-C were identical except omitting the silica.
TABLE VI______________________________________ PIGMENT DARKNESSTAPE (phr) COLOR L* a* b*______________________________________30 0.56 BLACK 2830-C 0.56 BLACK 3131 0.2 YELLOW 86 -5.9 5831-C 0.2 YELLOW 86 -7.6 64______________________________________
The 180° Peel of each of Tapes 30, 30-C, 31 and 31-C was within the range of 120-140 N/dm or substantially the same as identical tape except containing no pigment or silica.
A pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 32 was made to be identical to Tape 3 except that to one of its surfaces was transferred a thin, dense, microbubble-free pressure-sensitive adhesive layer of Tape 30 using a hot laminating roll at 71° C.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 33 was identical to Tape 32 except that its microbubble-free pressure-sensitive adhesive layer contained no carbon black. It had the same dark grey appearance from both faces.
TABLE V__________________________________________________________________________ DARK- 180°TAPE NESS PEEL T-PEELNO COLOR L* (N/dm) (N/dm)__________________________________________________________________________32 Microbubble-free Face Black 16 197 185Microbubble-filled Face Dark grey 33 16033 Microbubble-free Face Dark grey 33 187 185Microbubble-filled Face Dark grey 33 160__________________________________________________________________________
Pressure-sensitive adhesive Tape 34 was made as in Example A except that microbubbles made from a copolymer of poly(vinylidine chloride) and acrylonitrile were used in place of the glass microbubbles. The polymeric microbubbles, sold under the trade name "Miralite" 177, were obtained from the Pierce Stevens Chemical Corporation and had a true density of 0.036 g/cm3 and were 10-60 micrometers in diameter (average 30 micrometers). In order to obtain 33% volume of the bubbles, 1.9 parts of "Miralite" 177 were added to 100 parts of the syrup. Also added to 100 parts of the syrup were 0.25 part of Pigment A and 4 parts of hydrophobic silica ("Aerosil" 972). The resulting Tape 34 had an L* of 39. An identical Tape 34-C except for omission of the silica has an L* of 41.
Using a conventional knife coater, onto a low-adhesion surface of a biaxially oriented poly(ethylene terephthalate) film backing was coated a mixture of a partially polymerized syrup of 90 parts isooctyl acrylate and 10 parts acrylic acid, plus 0.1 part of "Irgacure" 651, 0.15 Photoactive s-triazine B of U.S. Pat. No. 4,330,590, and 1.0 part carbon black. Between this microbubble-free coating and an identical film backing was applied, using a roll coater, a microbubble-filled syrup identical to that used in making Tape 4 of Example A. The thicknesses of the two coatings were 0.025 and 0.875 mm, respectively. The two coatings were simultaneously photopolymerized as in Example A to provide Tape 35 of the invention. Tape 35 had a T-Peel of 328 N/dm. The microbubble-free face was black and had an L*=12 and 180° peel of 209 N/dm; the microbubble-filled face of the adhesive was dark grey and had an L*=33 and a 180° Peel of 180 N/dm.
Pressure-sensitive adhesive tape 36 was prepared identically to Tape 2 except the amount of hydrophobic silica was 6 phr and the amount of glass microbubbles was 8 phr. The adhesive layer of Tape 36 had an L*=37, a T-Peel of 370 N/dm, and a 180° Peel of 190 N/dm.
To a length of Tape 36 was laminated a thin, dense, microbubble-free, solution-polymerized adhesive layer identical to that of Tape 30 of Example K. To the other face of Tape 36 was laminated a layer of pressure-sensitive adhesive which was identical to that of Tape 30 except having no pigment. The resulting composite Tape 37 appeared to be black when viewed from the face to which the pigmented microbubble-free layer had been laminated and appeared to be grey from the face to which the clear microbubble-free layer had been laminated. The grey face of Tape 37 had an L*=37, a 90° Peel of 272 N/dm after a 20 min. dwell, and 90° Peel of 567 N/dm after a 72-hour dwell. Its black face had an L*=12, a 90° Peel of 436 N/dm after a 20-minute dwell, and a 90° Peel of 545 N/dm after a 72-hour dwell.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US24906 *||Jul 26, 1859||Simeon goodfellow|
|US2859198 *||Jun 12, 1951||Nov 4, 1958||Goodrich Co B F||Surface-coated silicon-containing particulate material and rubbery composition and method of making same|
|US3024146 *||Aug 4, 1958||Mar 6, 1962||Silicone rubber adhesive containing|
|US3993608 *||Jun 27, 1974||Nov 23, 1976||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Poly(urethane-isocyanurate) foams containing hollow glass spheres|
|US4071652 *||Mar 29, 1976||Jan 31, 1978||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Thermally conductive electrical tape|
|US4163081 *||May 8, 1978||Jul 31, 1979||Dow Corning Corporation||Self-adhering silicone compositions and preparations thereof|
|US4163091 *||Jun 14, 1977||Jul 31, 1979||Bayer Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the polymerization of chloroprene|
|US4223067 *||Mar 27, 1978||Sep 16, 1980||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Foam-like pressure-sensitive adhesive tape|
|US4287308 *||Jun 10, 1980||Sep 1, 1981||Matsumoto Yushi-Seiyaku Co., Ltd.||Process for preparing a thermo-expandable microspheres|
|US4303485 *||Aug 20, 1979||Dec 1, 1981||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Ultraviolet polymerization of acrylate monomers using oxidizable tin compounds|
|US4329384 *||Feb 14, 1980||May 11, 1982||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure-sensitive adhesive tape produced from photoactive mixture of acrylic monomers and polynuclear-chromophore-substituted halomethyl-2-triazine|
|US4330590 *||Feb 14, 1980||May 18, 1982||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Photoactive mixture of acrylic monomers and chromophore-substituted halomethyl-2-triazine|
|US4364972 *||Jan 16, 1981||Dec 21, 1982||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure-sensitive adhesive copolymers of acrylic acid ester and N-vinyl pyrrolidone|
|US4415615 *||Jun 1, 1982||Nov 15, 1983||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Co.||Cellular pressure-sensitive adhesive product and method of making|
|US4612242 *||Jun 3, 1985||Sep 16, 1986||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure-sensitive adhesive tape containing coated glass microbubbles|
|US4615472 *||Jun 19, 1985||Oct 7, 1986||Intravascular Surgical Instruments, Inc.||Catheter placement device|
|US4710536 *||Jul 22, 1986||Dec 1, 1987||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure-sensitive adhesive tape containing hydrophobic silica|
|CA747341A *||Nov 29, 1966||W. Engdahl Gordon||Pressure-sensitive adhesive tape|
|JPS52133339A *||Title not available|
|1||"Precipitated Silicas and Silicates" of Degussa Corp., Teterboro, NJ, dated Dec. 1978.|
|2||"Product Information" of Degussa Corp., marked PL/sk 6/4/84.|
|3||"Technical Bulletin Pigments", No. 6 of Degussa Corp., Teterboro, NJ, dated Mar. 1981.|
|4||*||Precipitated Silicas and Silicates of Degussa Corp., Teterboro, NJ, dated Dec. 1978.|
|5||*||Product Information of Degussa Corp., marked PL/sk 6/4/84.|
|6||*||Technical Bulletin Pigments , No. 6 of Degussa Corp., Teterboro, NJ, dated Mar. 1981.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5080972 *||Aug 30, 1989||Jan 14, 1992||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Particulate monitoring tape|
|US5085937 *||Feb 11, 1991||Feb 4, 1992||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Particulate monitoring tape|
|US5286416 *||Sep 22, 1992||Feb 15, 1994||Potters Industries Inc.||Galvanically compatible conductive filler useful for electromagnetic shielding and corrosion protection|
|US5304419 *||Mar 9, 1992||Apr 19, 1994||Alpha Fry Ltd||Moisture and particle getter for enclosures|
|US5409838 *||May 20, 1994||Apr 25, 1995||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Use of acid to stabilize indicator dyes in acrylate adhesives|
|US5443963 *||Jan 31, 1994||Aug 22, 1995||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method for detecting staphylococci|
|US5602221 *||Sep 29, 1995||Feb 11, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure sensitive adhesives with good low energy surface adhesion|
|US5616670 *||Sep 29, 1995||Apr 1, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure sensitive adhesives with good oily surface adhesion|
|US5620795 *||Jul 10, 1995||Apr 15, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Adhesives containing electrically conductive agents|
|US5635367 *||May 15, 1995||Jun 3, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Method for detecting staphylococci|
|US5654387 *||Aug 16, 1996||Aug 5, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure sensitive adhesives|
|US5683798 *||Apr 25, 1996||Nov 4, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Tackified pressure sensitive adhesives|
|US5708109 *||Feb 6, 1997||Jan 13, 1998||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure sensitive adhesives with good oily surface adhesion|
|US5708110 *||Feb 6, 1997||Jan 13, 1998||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Pressure sensitive adhesives with good low energy surface adhesion|
|US5756584 *||Jan 3, 1997||May 26, 1998||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Tackified pressure sensitive adhesives|
|US5883149 *||May 22, 1998||Mar 16, 1999||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Tackified pressure sensitive adhesives|
|US6126865 *||Mar 11, 1997||Oct 3, 2000||3M Innovative Properties Company||Adhesives containing electrically conductive agents|
|US6503620||Oct 29, 1999||Jan 7, 2003||Avery Dennison Corporation||Multilayer composite PSA constructions|
|US6769455||Feb 20, 2001||Aug 3, 2004||Certainteed Corporation||Moisture repellent air duct products|
|US6841234||Aug 1, 2001||Jan 11, 2005||Scapa Tapes North America Inc.||Heat-activated adhesive tape having an acrylic foam-like backing|
|US6986367||Nov 20, 2003||Jan 17, 2006||Certainteed Corporation||Faced mineral fiber insulation board with integral glass fabric layer|
|US7033975||May 20, 2003||Apr 25, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Use of surface-modified nanoparticles for oil recovery|
|US7181875||Mar 29, 2002||Feb 27, 2007||3M Innovative Properties Company||Stock material for trim caps|
|US7220470 *||Feb 20, 2001||May 22, 2007||Certainteed Corporation||Moisture repellent air duct products|
|US7223455||Jan 14, 2003||May 29, 2007||Certainteed Corporation||Duct board with water repellant mat|
|US7279438||Feb 2, 1999||Oct 9, 2007||Certainteed Corporation||Coated insulation board or batt|
|US7968039 *||Jun 8, 2005||Jun 28, 2011||Lintec Corporation||Method of producing pressure-sensitive adhesive sheet|
|US8215083||Jul 6, 2009||Jul 10, 2012||Certainteed Corporation||Insulation board with air/rain barrier covering and water-repellent covering|
|US20020004130 *||Jul 3, 2001||Jan 10, 2002||Ramesh Lhila||Acrylic foam-like tape|
|US20030220204 *||May 20, 2003||Nov 27, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Use of surface-modified nanoparticles for oil recovery|
|US20040137181 *||Jan 14, 2003||Jul 15, 2004||Ruid John O.||Duct board with water repellant mat|
|US20050031819 *||Aug 11, 2004||Feb 10, 2005||Mankell Kurt O.||Duct board with low weight water repellant mat|
|US20050064183 *||Oct 20, 2003||Mar 24, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Adhesive articles including a nanoparticle primer and methods for preparing same|
|US20050098255 *||Nov 6, 2003||May 12, 2005||Lembo Michael J.||Insulation product having nonwoven facing and process for making same|
|US20050112966 *||Nov 20, 2003||May 26, 2005||Toas Murray S.||Faced mineral fiber insulation board with integral glass fabric layer|
|US20050218655 *||Apr 11, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||Certain Teed Corporation||Duct board with adhesive coated shiplap tab|
|US20050221061 *||Apr 2, 2004||Oct 6, 2005||Toas Murray S||Method and apparatus for forming shiplap edge in air duct board using molding and machining|
|US20060019568 *||Jul 26, 2004||Jan 26, 2006||Toas Murray S||Insulation board with air/rain barrier covering and water-repellent covering|
|US20060078699 *||Oct 12, 2004||Apr 13, 2006||Mankell Kurt O||Insulation board with weather and puncture resistant facing and method of manufacturing the same|
|US20060083889 *||Oct 19, 2004||Apr 20, 2006||Schuckers Douglass S||Laminated duct board|
|US20060240251 *||Nov 9, 2005||Oct 26, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Adhesive articles including a nanoparticle primer and methods for preparing same|
|US20070001011 *||Aug 31, 2006||Jan 4, 2007||Verification Technologies, Inc.||Product packaging including digital data|
|US20070227653 *||Jun 8, 2005||Oct 4, 2007||Lintec Corporation||Method of Producing Pressure-Sensitive Adhesive Sheet|
|US20090266025 *||Jul 6, 2009||Oct 29, 2009||Certainteed Corporation||Insulation board with air/rain barrier covering and water-repellent covering|
|WO2002004200A1 *||Jul 3, 2001||Jan 17, 2002||Scapa Tapes North America, Inc.||Acrylic foam-like tape|
|U.S. Classification||428/40.4, 428/317.5, 428/406, 428/313.9, 428/220, 428/355.0AC, 428/343, 428/355.00R|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T428/249984, Y10T428/249974, Y10T428/1414, C09J7/0207, Y10T428/2891, Y10T428/2996, Y10T428/28, Y10T428/2852|
|Sep 17, 1991||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Jun 23, 1993||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jun 25, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Jun 27, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12