|Publication number||US4905383 A|
|Application number||US 07/259,528|
|Publication date||Mar 6, 1990|
|Filing date||Oct 18, 1988|
|Priority date||Oct 18, 1988|
|Publication number||07259528, 259528, US 4905383 A, US 4905383A, US-A-4905383, US4905383 A, US4905383A|
|Inventors||Donald E. Beckett, Joseph A. Carolfi|
|Original Assignee||Beckett Donald E, Carolfi Joseph A|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (23), Classifications (13), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a differentially responsive sole of the type with chambers to be filled with material to provide for individual out of normal weight distribution among weight bearing pressure points.
2. Description of the Prior Art
With the increase in running and walking marathons where competition is high, there has been considerable interest in improving footwear, and in tailoring it to an individual's particular weight bearing abnormalities. Many cushions and other devices have been proposed as described in the following U.S. patents to Wolstenholme et al., No. 3,892,077, Zente, No. 3,922,801, Turner et al., No. 4,364,188, Batra, No. 4,398,357, Meyers, No. 4,445,283, and Oatman, No. 4,658,515. While some of these structures provide a degree of cushioning for the user's feet, none of them provide for adequate compensation that is designed to satisfy the needs of an individual's particular foot weight bearing problems, and to accommodate or correct these problems using reproducible data.
During the past decade developments in sensory devices have provided researchers with new diagnostic information about the way people use their feet during ambulation. Some of this information can be used to illustrate how a person distributes, percentages of his or her body weight among selected Biomechanical Weight Bearing Pressure Points (B.W.B.P.P.) of the feet during ambulation. A normal distribution amongst the B.W.B.P.P) has been determined, and minor variations from these norms have been known to cause discomfort and problems both muscular and orthopedic. The resultant problems can occur in the foot, the leg, and even in the hips and lower spine.
The sole of the invention cushions the foot at selected locations where a person is overloading a point and stiffens where a person is underloading a point, the sole therefore providing for customizing to an individual's weight distribution pattern.
The sole of the invention includes a plurality of stragetically located empty chambers that are filled with an elastomer whose hardness and compressive strength, is determined by measuring selected biomechanical weight bearing pressure points (B.W.B.P.P.), and determining individual point values, so that the characteristics of the material for each of the individual points is determined and can then be formulated and placed into the chambers to provide an optimum sole response.
The principal object of the invention is to provide a differentially responsive sole for shoes that is tailored to the individuals particular measured load placing peculiarities for selected locations of feet.
A further object of the invention is to provide a sole of the character aforesaid which is simple and inexpensive to construct but durable and long lasting in use.
A further object of the invention is to provide a sole of the character aforesaid that should improve the users running and walking capabilities.
Other objects and advantageous features of the invention will be apparent from the description and claims.
The nature and characteristic features of the invention will be more readily understood from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings forming part hereof in which:
FIG. 1 is a bottom plan view of a typical individual's feet illustrating ten weight bearing points to be measured;
FIG. 2 is a bottom plan view of the sole of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view enlarged taken approximately on line 3--3 of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view enlarged taken approximately on the line 4--4 of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 5 is a vertical sectional view enlarged taken approximately on the line 5--5 of FIG. 1.
It should, of course, be understood that the description and drawings herein are illustrative merely and that various modifications and changes can be made in the structure disclosed without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Like numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views.
Referring now more particularly to the drawings and FIGS. 1 to 5 inclusive in FIG. 1 a typical individual's feet F and F' are illustrated with ten chambers where individual weight bearing points will be determined. A shoe SH is shown in fragmentary form which includes a sole S, two layers, S1 which is the outer sole, S2 which is the inner sole, and an inner liner L1. The outer sole S1 is of conventional configuration and the inner sole S2 has the ten chambers located in it as described below. The shoe SH also includes a heel H as shown in FIG. 5 and fill points FP for the chambers to be described. More or less chambers can be used as desired however it has been determined that ten stragetically located chambers provide the necessary support for most uses. These ten chambers are:
C3 1st Metatarsal
C4 2nd Metatarsal
C5 3rd and 4th Metatarsal
C6 5th Metatarsal
C7 medial Arch
C8 Lateral Arch
C9 Medial Heel
C10 Lateral Heel
The normal at peak load for these areas are:
C1 20% of Body WEight
C3 12% of Body Weight
C4 20% of Body Weight
C5 14% of Body Weight
C6 8% of Body WEight
C9 16% of Body Weight
C10 16% of Body Weight
These norms have been selected for standard dress shoes under walking conditions. A different set of norms are used for each type of shoe and the predominant mode of ambulation (walking, jogging, running, etc.). In addition, three neutral chambers are included in this example, which will be filled with an elastomer at the mean compressive strength. The mean compressive strength is determined by considering the type of shoe, the mode of amublation, and the user's body weight. These neutral chambers are important for filling all areas of the sole, forming a custom arch support and may become active if a person's pathology causes these areas to become weight bearing.
The assumptions used in determining an individual foot profile as described below are based on existing materials and data gathering equipment. Many other systems and materials are available and these assumptions are in no way restrictive or the only means to make the sole useful. The elastomer is available from Polytech Corp., P.O. Box 384, Lebanon, N.J. 08833, and the data gathering device is available from The Langer Biomechanical Group, Inc., 21 EAst Industry Court, Deer Park, New York 11729.
1. The elastomer (E) is a type which is modifiable in its compressive strength (D) by the addition of a plasticizer and/or a foaming agent (P) at manufacturing.
2. The elastomer without modification has a set hardness of 55 Shore A Durameter.
3. For each 400 parts of the elastomer the addition of 1 each part of the modifier P will have the effect of reducing the compressive strength to cushion 1 pound per square inch more of pressure at peak compression.
4. Since the mean compressive strength of the elastomer will require a certain amount of P for normal, the reverse is also true. The lowering of each 1 part of P will stiffen the elastomer to resist 1 pound per square inch more of pressure at peak compression.
5. These changes in compressive strength are all relative to the mean compressive strength.
6. The unmodified compressive strength (ID) will cushion 100 pounds per square inch.
1. A data source should be available to analyze the foot strike of an individual corresponding to the chambers (c) of the sole.
2. The data will be representative of the type of ambulation that the sole will be used for.
3. The data will be formatted as a percent of total body weight (PW) plus or minus the norm for that specific weight (B.).
4. Neutral chambers will have no data unless required.
The mean compressive strength (D) is determined by considering the shoe type (ST) that the sole will be used in (i.e. dress shoe, running shoe, etc.) and the body weight of the user (W).
ST is a factor to set the largest percent of body weight PW) that the sole would undergo while in use. Each type of use (running, walking, dancing, tennis, etc.) has its own maximum percent of body weight stress and it also has a unique percentage distribution pattern amongst the chambers of the sole.
The W factor is to establish the best compessive strength for the normal weight, while allowing enough range of modification in the elastomer to compensate for out of normal weight readings.
The formulas for mixing the mean compressive strength elastomer is as follows.
The following formula is used to establish the compressive strength for any chamber.
Measurements were made of a typical individual as follows:
Body weight: 187 pounds
Shoe type: casual shoe
Shoe use: walking
______________________________________DATAPeak force Normal Out______________________________________Left foot:1 12% B.W. 20% B.W. -8%2 neutral3 18% B.W. 12% B.W. +6%4 23% B.W. 20% B.W. +3%5 16% B.W. 14% B.W. +2%6 14% B.W. 8% B.W. +6%7 neutral8 neutral9 15% B.W. 16% B.W. -1%10 13% B.W. 16% B.W. -3%Right foot:1 16% B.W. 20% B.W. -4%2 neutral3 14% B.W. 12% B.W. +2%4 20% B.W. 20% B.W. 0%5. 14% B.W. 14% B.W. 0%6 11% B.W. 8% B.W. +3%7. neutral8. neutral9 14% B.W. 16% B.W. -2%10 15% B.W. 16% B.W. -1%______________________________________
The data was obtained by using the well known Langer measuring equipment, however it is expected that other such equipment would also provide useful data from which suitable soles could be constructed.
D=65.5 lbs/sq inch
ID=100 lbs/sq. inch
The cushioning needed for D is obtained by adding 34.5 parts [P(D)] to every 400 parts of E
So for 600 grams of E
You would add 51.75 grams of P
The cushioning needed for a chamber D(C) is obtained by multiplying the out of norm load (PW) (plus or minus) by the total weight (W). Then multiplying that result by the parts of P needed per pound per sq. inch cushioning. Then adding that to the mean P(D).
Each batch will have a 600 gram amount of E. Also a ratio of 1 part P to modify 400 parts E by 1 lb. per sq. inch of cushioning. Results will be rounded to the nearest hundredth gram. Neutral chambers will be filled with mean compressive strength elastomer.
______________________________________chamber E batch Total P______________________________________Left foot1 600 gr 29.31 gr2 600 gr 51.75 gr3 600 gr 78.58 gr4 600 gr 60.17 gr5 600 gr 57.36 gr6 600 gr 78.58 gr7 600 gr 51.75 gr8 600 gr 51.75 gr9 600 gr 48.94 gr10 600 gr 43.33 grRight foot1 600 gr 40.08 gr2 600 gr 51.75 gr3. 600 gr 57.36 gr4 600 gr 60.17 gr5 600 gr 51.75 gr6 600 gr 60.17 gr7 600 gr 51.75 gr8 600 gr 46.14 gr10 600 gr 48.94 gr______________________________________
Construction of the soles with the described material in the identified chambers resulted in soles which compensated for the user's weight bearing pattern. While the tests were conducted for a walking shoe, tests for athletic and other special purpose shoes can be expected to develop useful data which can be used to manufacture soles for use in such shoes.
It will thus be seen that soles have been provided with which the objects of the invention are achieved.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2677906 *||Aug 14, 1952||May 11, 1954||Arnold Reed||Cushioned inner sole for shoes and meth od of making the same|
|US2863231 *||Jan 17, 1958||Dec 9, 1958||Canadian Footwear Res Inc||Fabrication of footwear having differentially deformable insoles|
|US4229889 *||Jun 6, 1978||Oct 28, 1980||Charles Petrosky||Pressurized porous material cushion shoe base|
|US4408402 *||Aug 5, 1982||Oct 11, 1983||Looney Judy A||Supportive shoe and insert|
|US4471538 *||Jun 15, 1982||Sep 18, 1984||Pomeranz Mark L||Shock absorbing devices using rheopexic fluid|
|US4633877 *||Aug 7, 1984||Jan 6, 1987||Duramet Systems, Inc.||Dynamic foot support and kit therefor|
|US4744157 *||Oct 3, 1986||May 17, 1988||Dubner Benjamin B||Custom molding of footgear|
|US4760655 *||Jul 7, 1986||Aug 2, 1988||Walter Mauch||Insole|
|DE3627538A1 *||Aug 13, 1986||Feb 18, 1988||Alfred Fleischmann||Insole for shoes, especially support|
|DE3639505A1 *||Nov 20, 1986||Jun 1, 1988||Nicolai Gmbh & Co Kg||Foot bed and correction insole with regions having different strengths|
|NO104732A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5170572 *||May 31, 1991||Dec 15, 1992||Insole Control, Inc.||Tripod support insole|
|US5255753 *||May 19, 1992||Oct 26, 1993||Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Foot structure for legged walking robot|
|US5282288 *||Sep 28, 1992||Feb 1, 1994||Nubreed Corporation||Athletic shoe with interchangeable elements|
|US5282328 *||Jul 9, 1992||Feb 1, 1994||Peterson Technology Trust||Custom foot beds for footwear|
|US5313717 *||Dec 20, 1991||May 24, 1994||Converse Inc.||Reactive energy fluid filled apparatus providing cushioning, support, stability and a custom fit in a shoe|
|US5678566 *||Sep 13, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Diagnostic Thermographics, Inc.||Method and apparatus of thermographic evaluation of the plantar surface of feet|
|US5768803 *||May 15, 1996||Jun 23, 1998||Levy; Dodd M.||Adjustable insole for support of painful foot areas|
|US6393731||Jun 4, 2001||May 28, 2002||Vonter Moua||Impact absorber for a shoe|
|US6745499||May 24, 2002||Jun 8, 2004||Reebok International Ltd.||Shoe sole having a resilient insert|
|US6918883||Jun 18, 2003||Jul 19, 2005||Cannon Research Institute Of Carolinas Medical Center||Sock for detection of pressure points on feet|
|US7013582||Jul 15, 2003||Mar 21, 2006||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Full length cartridge cushioning system|
|US7350320||Mar 31, 2006||Apr 1, 2008||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Structural element for a shoe sole|
|US7401419||Feb 3, 2006||Jul 22, 2008||Adidas International Marketing B.V,||Structural element for a shoe sole|
|US7644518||Feb 25, 2008||Jan 12, 2010||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Structural element for a shoe sole|
|US7954259||Apr 4, 2007||Jun 7, 2011||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Sole element for a shoe|
|US8122615||Jul 2, 2008||Feb 28, 2012||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Structural element for a shoe sole|
|US8555529||Apr 28, 2011||Oct 15, 2013||Adidas International Marketing B.V.||Sole element for a shoe|
|US8667715 *||Oct 7, 2010||Mar 11, 2014||Santtro, Llc||Orthotic devices and methods for manufacturing same|
|US9055782 *||Oct 24, 2008||Jun 16, 2015||Kevin McDonnell||Multistructural support system for a sole in a running shoe|
|US20100101111 *||Oct 24, 2008||Apr 29, 2010||Mcdonnell Kevin||Multistructural support system for a sole in a running shoe|
|US20110083345 *||Oct 7, 2010||Apr 14, 2011||Santopietro Frank J||Orthotic devices and methods for manufacturing same|
|US20130192088 *||Aug 3, 2012||Aug 1, 2013||Bernie Veldman||Orthotic insert assembly|
|WO2001043638A1 *||Dec 14, 2000||Jun 21, 2001||Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital||Sock for detection of pressure points in feet|
|U.S. Classification||36/28, 36/88, 36/140, 36/30.00A, 36/44|
|International Classification||A43B13/40, A43B13/18|
|Cooperative Classification||A43B7/1465, A43B13/40, A43B13/186|
|European Classification||A43B7/14A30R, A43B13/18A5, A43B13/40|
|Nov 12, 1993||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 2, 1994||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Mar 2, 1994||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Oct 14, 1997||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 8, 1998||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|May 19, 1998||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19980311