|Publication number||US4908702 A|
|Application number||US 07/187,716|
|Publication date||Mar 13, 1990|
|Filing date||Apr 29, 1988|
|Priority date||Apr 29, 1988|
|Publication number||07187716, 187716, US 4908702 A, US 4908702A, US-A-4908702, US4908702 A, US4908702A|
|Inventors||Tien-Hsin Chao, Hua-Kuang Liu|
|Original Assignee||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (16), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (20), Classifications (15), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention described herein was made in the performance of work under a NASA contract, and is subject to the provisions of Public Law 96-517 (35 USC 202) in which the Contractor has elected not to retain title.
This invention relates to optical processors, and to image difference detectors of the type wherein the images are represented by two transparencies which are to be compared.
One type of image difference detector includes means for holding two created image representations, such as transparencies formed by photographs taken on slide film, so they are coplanar. Collimated light passes through the two transparencies and the light is focused as images at an image plane. The images are made coincident at the image plane by polarizing the light passing through the two images in transverse directions and passing the light through a Wollaston prism that forms coincident images. The Wollaston prism employs the polarizations to direct the images into coincidence. The polarization also results in a 180° phase difference between the images. An analyzer can sense locations where the two coincident images do not cancel, to thereby sense areas of the images which are not coincident. A modified form of the image difference detector employs different color filters in line with the transparencies, such as green and red filters, to create coincident images at the image plane where the image is yellow except at areas where the images are not identical (where they are red or green).
Devices for creating image representations such as transparencies representing the images being compared, which could generate the image representations in real time and at low cost, would facilitate the production of real-time optical processing devices.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a difference detecting apparatus is provided which includes a relatively low cost apparatus for producing created image representations such as transparencies in real time. The apparatus includes at least one display having coplanar but spaced portions that each includes multiple individually addressable pixels whose polarization rotation can be controlled. A pair of video signal generators is provided such as a camera which can view an actual object or a video recording, and means are provided for controlling the image on each display portion according to the output of the video generator. Where light passing through the two images is to be polarized in transverse directions for interference difference detection, the transparencies can be formed as portions of a single liquid crystal display. An available television liquid crystal or magneto rotation display monitor can be used, but with the polarization sheets removed.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention will be best understood from the following description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an image difference detection apparatus constructed in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a sectional view of a portion of the image display device of FIG. 1, and indicating how it can be obtained from a liquid crystal television monitor.
FIG. 3 is an exploded perspective view of one embodiment of a display of the type indicated in FIG. 2, including a prior art polarization sheet arrangement.
FIG. 4 is an exploded perspective view of another type of display device of the type indicated in FIG. 2, including another prior art polarization sheet arrangement.
FIG. 5 is perspective view of an image difference detection apparatus constructed in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 1 illustrates a system 10 for detecting the difference between two images 12, 14 defined by created image representations formed by transparencies 16, 18 of an image display device 20. Coherent light such as from a laser 22 is collimated by a lens 24 and passes through a polarizer 26 whose polarization orientation is as indicated by the arrow thereon. Where the light is randomly polarized, the polarizer 26 is not necessary. The light passes through both transparencies 16, 18 of the image display device and through first and second polarizing filters 30, 32. The polarizing directions of the filters are as indicated, with the first 30 being oriented so its polarization orientation is horizontal and the second 32 oriented so its polarization direction is vertical. The light passing through the filters 30, 32 includes a first processed image-representing light beam 34 which includes horizontally polarized light representing the transparency image 12, and a second processed image-representing light beam 36 which includes vertically polarized light representing the second image 14.
An apparatus 40 responsive to the polarizations of the light beams 34, 36 indicates their differences. Basically, the apparatus 40 includes a polarizer 41 with its polarizing direction as indicated, which forms images of the transparency-representing images 12, 14 onto a common plane 44, with the images being coincident. The different directions of polarization of the light beams 34, 36 results in their being 180° out of phase, so that identical portions of the two images interfere to cancel out one another. The only light left at the image plane includes light from portions of the images that are not identical. The apparatus 40 includes an imaging or focusing lens 42 which forms images of the transparencies at the image plane 44. A Wollaston prism 46, which can be formed of two pieces of birefringent material such as Calcite but of different indexes of refraction, splits each light beam into two diverging components, the directions of divergence depending on the direction of polarization of light beams. Thus, the light beam 34 is split into two portions forming images at 34a, 34b, while the other light beam 36 is split into two image portions 36a, 36b. The prism is located so that two of the image portions 34a, 36a of the two light beams are coincident at the image plane. A rotatable analyzer 48 can be positioned to detect the degree of correspondence of the images.
The above-described portion of the system 10 has been known but difficult to implement. A major difficulty is generating the created image representations such as the transparencies 16, 18 representing the images to be compared, so the transparencies can be created in real time. Applicant forms the image display device 20 so it includes a display 50 having multiple pixels that produce a controlled polarization rotation of light passing therethrough. The display is controlled by a video circuit 52 which receives signals from at least one video signal generator 54. In one example, the display is the monitor of a liquid crystal television which has been modified as described below. The generator 54 is a video camera that views two objects 56, 58 and passes corresponding video signals to the video circuit 52 which drives the liquid crystal display 50. In another example, two generators are used, one being a video camera 60 which views an object 62 and another generator includes a record means such as a video disk player 64 which forms a record means that stores and plays back a video image. A combiner 66 combines the video outputs of the two generators 60, 64 to produce a single video output representing a screen display containing the two images represented by the two generator outputs, but with the two images occupying different portions of the video display. Thus, in the liquid crystal display 50, one of the images 12 occupies an upper portion of the display while the other image 14 occupies a lower portion of the display.
Liquid crystal displays and video circuitry for driving them are available in low cost monochromatic television sets, except that such displays cannot be used without modification. FIG. 2 illustrates a portion of the liquid crystal display 50. It includes a pair of plates or sheets 70, 72 with a separator 73 and a layer of liquid crystal material 74 between them. One of the sheets 70 has numerous parallel vertical conductors 76 thereon, while the other sheet has numerous horizontal conductors 78. Each location in the liquid crystal layer 74 where a pair of conductors 76, 78 cross defines a pixel wherein the electric field can be controlled. When there is no electric field, the liquid crystal material rotates the angle of polarization of light passing therethrough by 90°. When the electric field approaches a saturated level the polarization of light passing therethrough is not affected. Electric fields between zero and saturation cause a corresponding amount of rotation of polarization of light passing therethrough. It may be noted that for high speed operation, as required in a television set, the rotation angle may vary within a limited range such as between 79° and 90°, but the range of rotation can be considerably increased where lower speed operation is acceptable.
When used as a television monitor, the display of a television set includes a pair of additional sheets 80, 82 of polarizing material. FIG. 3 illustrates one arrangement where such sheets 80, 82 have parallel directions of polarization. The first sheet 80 lets through primarily vertically polarized light. If there is a zero electric field at one of the pixels such as 84, then the vertically polarized light is rotated 90°. The second polarizer sheet 82 will then block all light. On the other hand, if the electric field of the pixel 84 rotates the light by only 80°, then about 10% of the light will pass through the second sheet 82. In another television monitor arrangement shown in FIG. 4, the polarizing sheet 80a, 82a are oriented in perpendicular directions. The first sheet 80a lets through vertically polarized light which may be rotated 90° by one of the pixels 84a if there is no electrical field thereat. This will allow all of the light to pass through the second polarizer 82a. If there is an electrical field at the pixel 84a which causes rotation of the light by only 80°, then perhaps only 90% of the light will pass through the second polarizer 82a.
If the television monitors of FIGS. 3 or 4 were used with their polarizer sheet in place, then they would not be suitable for the system 10 of FIG. 1, because at least one of the processed light beams 34 or 36 would have all of its light blocked. Applicant is able to use an available low cost liquid crystal display television monitor, by removing the polarizing sheets 80, 82 which are generally attached to the outer surfaces of the plates or sheets 70, 72 that contain the liquid crystal material.
Applicant prefers to use a single liquid crystal display 50 (FIG. 1) with the two transparencies occupying different portions of the display. This assures that both of the transparencies 16, 18 will lie precisely coplanar. If the two transparencies were not precisely coplanar, then it would be more difficult to produce precisely coincident images at the image plane, which would detract from the comparison of the images.
While a liquid crystal display of the type described above can be used, it should be noted that other types of real time SLM (spacial light modulators) can be used instead. Any such type of SLM will include multiple individually addressable pixels which control the polarization orientation of light passing through them. For example, the Hughes LCLV (Liquid Crystal Light Valve) Spacial Light Modulator sold by the Hughes Aircraft Company may be used. In that SLM the modulation on the input side may be controlled by light from a conventional TV monitor. The light from the monitor controls photoconductors at the SLM pixels. These pixels control the polarization of light reflected from the output side. Light may be considered to pass through such a display by passage through the monitor screen to the LCTV and reflection therefrom. Another example is the SIGHT-MOD. sold by The SEMETEX Corporation of Torrence, Calif., which has pixels of the magneto optical Faraday rotation type. The pixels are addressed by crossed electrodes carrying currents that control the magnetic, field at each pisel. The magnetic field can change the orientation of polarization of input light at the pixels and the pixels therefore represent the created image representation. In the LCLV case, reflection rather than transmission is used so that a Schlering system with a cubic beamsplitter is required at the location of the display device at 50.
FIG. 5 illustrates another system 90 which relies upon difference in color rather than cancelling of light by interference, for the comparison of images. The system includes a light source 92 which preferably emits white light, and which does not need coherence in any of the color components of the light. A lens 94 Collimates the light. A polarizer 96 with its direction of polarization as indicated, is used where the light is not randomly polarized. The light passes through an image display device 100 which forms a pair of images 102, 104 by a pair of transparencies 106, 108 having areas of differing degrees of transparencies. In addition, a green filter 110 lies over the first transparency 106 while a red filter 112 lies over the second transparency 108. The light from each transparency then passes through one of a pair of polarizing filters 114, 116 respectively polarized horizontally and vertically. A pair of processed image-representing light beams 120, 122 emerge after passing through the transparencies, color filters, and polarizers. These light beams are used to form coincident images of the transparency images 102, 104 on an image plane 124. This is accomplished by an imaging lens 126 and a Wollaston prism 128 in the same manner as for the system of FIG. 1. However, an analyzer is not used here, but instead a person or sensor views the coincident images 114a, 116a at the image plane. Where there are identical image portions, the overlapping green and red light results in a yellow color. Where there is a difference, the corresponding portions of the image are green or red.
In the system of FIG. 5, the different polarization of the light beams 120, 122 is used to enable the production of precisely coincident images, using an optical setup that is relatively stable. However, it is possible to use other optical systems to form images of the same size and that are both sharply in focus at an image plane, and that are precisely coincident at that image plane. However, such optical systems generally direct each light beam through a different set of optical elements, and it is difficult to hold such elements in precise position and orientation relative to each other.
The system described above for FIG. 5 is known. However, as with the system of FIG. 1, it has been difficult to generate two transparencies representing the two images to be compared, in real time. Applicant uses an image display device 100 of the same type as described above for the image device 20 of FIG. 1. For example, the image device 100 can be formed by a liquid crystal display which includes a pair of plates or sheets having generally perpendicular electrical conductors thereon and trapping liquid crystal material between them. A liquid crystal display of a television set can be used by removing the polarizing sheets at its opposite faces, which results in a display devoid of a pair of polarization sheets that each covers substantially the entire display, which have polarization directions that are parallel or perpendicular to one another. At least one and preferably two video generators 130, 132 generate video signals representing a pair of images, the output of the generators passing through a combiner 134 and a video circuit 136 to the liquid crystal display 138 of the image display device. The use of a single liquid crystal display 138 facilitates the forming of two coincident images 114a, 116a that are both in focus at the image plane.
Thus, the invention provides apparatus for detecting the difference between two images, of the type that employs two created image representations such as in the form of transparencies and means for combining the images to be compared, which facilitates the generation of the images in real time. This is accomplished by using a display having multiple rows and columns of individually addressable pixels, and by the use of a video generating means which generates video signals representing two images to be compared and which controls the polarization of the pixels (in the presence of an external polarizing sheet) of the display. The display can be a liquid crystal display of a monochromatic television monitor wherein all pixels can affect the rotation of polarization, but the pixels do not individually filter out certain colors of light more that other pixels.
Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated herein, it is recognized that modifications and variations may readily occur to those skilled in the art and consequently it is intended to cover such modifications and equivalents.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3389056 *||Jul 9, 1964||Jun 18, 1968||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Fuel assemblies|
|US3787117 *||Oct 2, 1972||Jan 22, 1974||Western Electric Co||Methods and apparatus for inspecting workpieces by spatial filtering subtraction|
|US4330712 *||Jan 29, 1980||May 18, 1982||Hajime Industries Ltd.||Inspection apparatus for defects on patterns|
|US4458993 *||Oct 5, 1981||Jul 10, 1984||Kempf Paul S||Fingerprint comparator|
|US4476465 *||Aug 30, 1982||Oct 9, 1984||Litton Systems, Inc.||Magneto-optic display generator|
|US4513441 *||Aug 2, 1983||Apr 23, 1985||Sparta, Inc.||Image comparison system|
|US4542404 *||Jun 14, 1982||Sep 17, 1985||Rca Corporation||Charge coupled device based system and method for inspecting and modifying images|
|US4612666 *||Jul 5, 1984||Sep 16, 1986||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy||Automatic pattern recognition apparatus|
|US4637056 *||Oct 13, 1983||Jan 13, 1987||Battelle Development Corporation||Optical correlator using electronic image preprocessing|
|US4648053 *||Oct 30, 1984||Mar 3, 1987||Kollmorgen Technologies, Corp.||High speed optical inspection system|
|US4653867 *||Jun 3, 1985||Mar 31, 1987||Sony Corporation||Liquid crystal display apparatus|
|US4663670 *||Dec 11, 1984||May 5, 1987||Citizen Watch Co., Ltd.||Television receiver having a liquid crystal display device|
|US4680627 *||Mar 12, 1986||Jul 14, 1987||Hitachi, Ltd.||Apparatus for checking patterns on printed circuit boards|
|US4692943 *||Dec 27, 1984||Sep 8, 1987||Dr. Ludwig Pietzsch Gmbh||Method of and system for opto-electronic inspection of a two-dimensional pattern on an object|
|US4770500 *||Jun 10, 1986||Sep 13, 1988||Kaiser Aerospace And Electronics Corporation||Method and apparatus for multi color display|
|US4772101 *||Nov 7, 1986||Sep 20, 1988||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Remotely controllable real-time optical processor|
|1||"Application of Inexpensive LC TV to Optical Parallel Logic"; SPIE vol. 825, Spatial Light Modulators and Applications; Yu et al; 1987; pp. 163-168.|
|2||"Real-Time LC TV XOR and XNOR-Gate Binary Image Subtraction Technique", Applied Optics, vol. 26, #14, Jul. '87, Yu et al.|
|3||"Real-Time Optical Interferometric Image Subtraction by Wave Polarization", Zhao et al; Applied Optics, vol. 4, #21, Nov. '82.|
|4||*||Application of Inexpensive LC TV to Optical Parallel Logic ; SPIE vol. 825, Spatial Light Modulators and Applications; Yu et al; 1987; pp. 163 168.|
|5||*||Real Time LC TV XOR and XNOR Gate Binary Image Subtraction Technique , Applied Optics, vol. 26, 14, Jul. 87, Yu et al.|
|6||*||Real Time Optical Interferometric Image Subtraction by Wave Polarization , Zhao et al; Applied Optics, vol. 4, 21, Nov. 82.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5173954 *||Dec 23, 1991||Dec 22, 1992||Hamamatsu Photonics Kabushiki Kaisha||Spatial light modulation device and image reconstructing apparatus using the same|
|US5262979 *||Aug 19, 1991||Nov 16, 1993||The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration||Optoelectronic associative memory|
|US5268679 *||May 31, 1991||Dec 7, 1993||U.S. Philips Corporation||Optical data processing device|
|US5317651 *||May 10, 1993||May 31, 1994||Thomson-Csf||Non-linear and adaptive signal-processing device|
|US5384650 *||Apr 6, 1992||Jan 24, 1995||Hughes Aircraft Company||Light valve with twisted perpendicular liquid crystal with a negative dielectric anisotropy|
|US5454047 *||Jan 12, 1994||Sep 26, 1995||Hughes Aircraft Company||Optical method and system for generating expansion coefficients for an image processing function|
|US5975703 *||Sep 30, 1996||Nov 2, 1999||Digital Optics International||Image projection system|
|US6375327||Apr 10, 2001||Apr 23, 2002||Digital Optics Internat||Image projection system|
|US6520643||Jan 11, 2002||Feb 18, 2003||Digital Optics International||Image projection system|
|US6529616 *||Nov 29, 1999||Mar 4, 2003||Xerox Corporation||Technique for accurate color-color registration measurements|
|US8348489||Jan 29, 2009||Jan 8, 2013||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Thin illumination system|
|US8721149||Jul 31, 2012||May 13, 2014||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Illumination device having a tapered light guide|
|US8740439||Dec 21, 2012||Jun 3, 2014||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Thin illumination system|
|US8786821 *||May 14, 2010||Jul 22, 2014||Fujitsu Limited||Polarization controller and polarization mode dispersion compensator|
|US9244212||May 7, 2014||Jan 26, 2016||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Illumination device having a tapered light guide|
|US9395479||Feb 20, 2015||Jul 19, 2016||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Illumination device having a tapered light guide|
|US9448353||Feb 20, 2015||Sep 20, 2016||Qualcomm Mems Technologies, Inc.||Illumination device having a tapered light guide|
|US20090059038 *||Apr 13, 2005||Mar 5, 2009||Seakins Paul J||Image magnifier for the visually impaired|
|US20100296152 *||May 14, 2010||Nov 25, 2010||Fujitsu Limited||Polarization controller and polarization mode dispersion compensator|
|US20100315833 *||Jan 29, 2009||Dec 16, 2010||Digital Optics International Llc||Thin illumination system|
|U.S. Classification||348/161, 349/96, 349/57, 353/20, 349/17, 345/4, 348/335, 382/210, 345/87|
|International Classification||G06E3/00, G06K9/74|
|Cooperative Classification||G06E3/005, G06K9/74|
|European Classification||G06K9/74, G06E3/00A2|
|Jun 4, 1993||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 12, 1998||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 15, 1998||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|May 26, 1998||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19980318