Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS4915827 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 07/195,796
Publication dateApr 10, 1990
Filing dateMay 19, 1988
Priority dateMay 19, 1988
Fee statusPaid
Publication number07195796, 195796, US 4915827 A, US 4915827A, US-A-4915827, US4915827 A, US4915827A
InventorsRobert D. Rosenthal
Original AssigneeTrebor Industries, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and apparatus for optical sorting of materials using near infrared absorbtion criteria
US 4915827 A
Abstract
Method and apparatus for sorting desired pieces of material from undesired material present in mixtures thereof. A piece of material from a mixture of pieces of desired and undesired materials is irradiated with a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation. The absorptions by the irradiated piece of near-infrared radiation energy is measured at a plurality of wavelengths. The measured absorptions are sequentially compared to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria in a predetermined order, which criteria distinguish the desired material from undesired material. If the piece fails any one criterion, it is rejected, whereas if the piece passes all criteria, it is accepted as a desired piece.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(7)
I claim:
1. A method for sorting desired pieces of agricultural materials from pieces of undesired material present in mixtures of desired agricultural material and undesired materials, comprising:
(a) irradiating a piece of material from a mixture of pieces of desired agricultural material and pieces of undesired material with a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation;
(b) measuring values for said plurality of wavelengths of near infrared radiation exiting said piece which are indicative of near-infrared radiation absorbed by said piece;
(c) sequentially comparing the measured values to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria in a predetermined order, which criteria distinguish the desired pieces of agricultural material from undesired pieces of material;
(d) rejecting the piece if it fails any one criterion in the sequence; and
(e) accepting the piece if it passes all criteria in the sequence.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein each piece is simultaneously irradiated at each of said wavelengths.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the pieces of material are singulated prior to being irradiated.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein after a piece fails a criterion it is not tested for a subsequent criteria.
5. An apparatus for sorting desired pieces of agricultural material from undesired pieces of material present in mixtures of desired agricultural material and undesired materials, comprising:
(a) means for irradiating a piece of material from a mixture of pieces of desired agricultural material and pieces of undesired material with a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation;
(b) means for measuring values for said plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation exiting said piece which are indicative of near-infrared radiation absorbed by said piece;
(c) means for sequentially comparing the measured values to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria in a predetermined order, which criteria distinguish the desired pieces of agricultural material from undesired pieces of material;
(d) means for rejecting the piece if it fails any one criterion in the sequence or for accepting the piece if it passes all criteria in the sequence.
6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the irradiating means irradiates a piece simultaneously with each of said wavelengths.
7. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the comparing means does not test a sample for subsequent criteria after a piece fails a criterion.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to the field of optical sorting of desirable materials from mixtures that also contain undesirable materials.

2. Description of the Background Art

The harvesting and gathering of agricultural products into bulk accumulations on a commercial scale usually results in a certain percentage of undesirable materials intermixed with the desired agricultural product. The undesired material may include trash, debris, diseased product, and the like. Machines of varying effectiveness are known in the prior art for sorting the desired product from the undesirable material. In providing a sorting device, the goal is to eliminate as much of the undesirable material as possible with as little human labor and waste of desired product as possible.

The prior art contains a number of apparatus and processes for measuring constituents of samples, such as grains, for moisture, protein and oil content utilizing near-infrared radiation energy. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,466,076 and 4,627,008, both to Robert D. Rosenthal, the inventor of the present invention, disclose instruments that can measure constituents of a sample by transmitting near-infrared radiation energy through the sample. These instruments utilize a phenomenon that certain organic substances absorb energy in the near-infrared region of the spectrum. By measuring the amount of energy absorbed by the substances at specific wavelengths, precise quantitative measurements of the constituents of a produce can be determined. While such instruments have proven extremely useful for measuring one or more constituents of a particular sample, near-infrared light transmittance technology has not heretofore been suggested as suitable for separating desirable materials from mixtures that also contain undesirable materials.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for sorting desirable pieces of material from undesirable materials present in mixtures of desirable and undesirable materials. In accordance with the invention, a piece of material from a mixture of pieces of desirable and undesirable materials is irradiated with a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation. Absorption by the piece of a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation is measured, and the measured absorptions are sequentially compared to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria, in a predetermined order. The criteria distinguish the desirable material from the undesirable material. If the piece fails any one criteria in the sequence, it is rejected. If, however, the piece passes all criteria in the sequence, it is accepted.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an apparatus for performing the method of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow chart for sorting of almonds via successive criteria in accordance with the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The present invention is useful for sorting of commodities, such as almonds, green beans and the like, that after harvesting the gathering in bulk contain a certain percentage of contaminants such as trash, debris, and diseased or insect-damaged product.

In FIG. 1, a mixture of desirable materials such as almonds 10 and undesirable materials 12, such as almond by-products, trash, debris and insect damaged or diseased almonds, are singulated (i.e., arranged in single file) on a suitable conveying means 14 for placing the pieces in position for near-infrared analysis. A plurality of infrared emitting diodes (IREDs) 16 are positioned for irradiating the pieces of material with near-infrared radiation through a near-infrared-transparent window 18 as each piece of material is positioned in front of window 18. Each piece of material is irradiated with a plurality of wavelengths of near-infrared radiation from the IREDs. The near-infrared radiation wavelength range is from about 740 to about 1100 nanometers. In the illustrated embodiment, each piece is simultaneously irradiated at each of the preselected wavelengths by the IREDs 16.

The near-infrared radiation emitted from IREDs 16 impinges on the sample piece being analyzed, and a certain portion of the energy is transmitted through the sample while some of the energy is absorbed by the sample. Energy that is transmitted through the sample passes through near-infrared transparent window 20 and is measured by near-infrared radiation detectors 22 at a plurality of wavelengths. Each detector 22 is provided with a narrow bandpass filter 24 that allows energy of the particular wavelength being measured to pass through the respective detector.

The absorption of particular wavelengths measured by detectors 22 is sequentially compared to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria in a predetermined order by sensor-control/microcomputer 30. The particular criteria selected distinguish the desirable material from undesirable material. The particular criteria selected will depend upon the material being sorted. Also, the sequence that the measured absorptions are compared to the different criteria can vary, depending upon the material being sorted.

In accordance with the present invention, an internal microprocessing unit in the sensor-control/microcomputer sorting system 30 controls IREDs 16 and detectors 22 for measuring each sample as it is passed by detectors 22. The microprocessor automatically compares the absorption measurements to a successive series of different criteria. If the sample fails the first criterion, it is automatically rejected, for example, by being diverted along pathway 26 by gate 28, as shown schematically in FIG. 1. However, if the sample passes the first criterion, it is then tested for a second criterion, and so on.

FIG. 2 shows a flow chart for sorting almonds via successive criteria. The first criterion that is compared is optical density (opacity) of a sample at 700 nanometers. Optical density is defined as Log 1/I where I is interactance and equal to Es /Er (Es =energy received from subject; Er =energy received from a reference). For almonds, the maximum optical density (LOG 1/I) selected is 5.92. If a sample has an optical density in excess of the maximum allowed, it is immediately rejected without testing for subsequent criteria.

For sorting almonds, a second useful criterion is optical transparency of the sample at 700 nanometers. For almonds, a selected minimum optical transparency measured as Log 1/I is 4.25. Samples having an optical transparency of less than 4.25 are rejected, and not tested for any subsequent criteria. However, if the sample passes the second criterion, it is tested for a third criterion.

A useful third criterion for almonds is an oil plus oil/cellulose/protein absorption minimum. For this criterion, a multi-term regression is performed as follows: 10(OD928 -OD850)+10(OD1000 -OD950), wherein OD928, OD850, OD1000 and OD950 are optical density at 928 nanometers, 850 nanometers, 1,000 nanometers, and 950 nanometers, respectively. When storing almonds, all samples that are less than the value 1.27 for the above equation are rejected. Those samples that measured above 1.27 are tested for a fourth criterion.

Almonds have a relatively high oil content. Accordingly, absorption at the oil absorption band of 928 nanometers has been found to be a valuable fourth criterion when utilizing the equation: 10(OD928 -OD850), wherein OD928 and OD850 are optical densities at 928 and 850 nanometers, respectively. Samples having a value of less than 0.76 for the above equation are rejected, whereas those having a value of 0.76 or above are tested for the fifth criterion.

Cellulose absorption has been found to be a good fifth criterion for almonds sorting. For cellulose measurement, the following equation is used: L=10(OD1000 -OD950), wherein OD1000 and OD950 are optical density at 1,000 and 950 nanometers, respectively. Samples having a value of 0.50 L or larger pass on to the sixth criterion, whereas samples that measure below that value are rejected.

A useful sixth criterion for almond sorting measures a subtle difference between good almonds and almonds damaged by insects or disease. This criterion was developed using wavelength calibration constants determined from stepwise regression of independent samples, and the following equation has been found to be useful:

Sort=-17.80-50.81 OD750 +24.71 OD800 +160.32 OD825 -126.21 OD875 

wherein OD750, OD800, OD825, and OD875 are optical density at 750, 800, 825 and 875 nanometers, respectively. Using a sorting threshhold value 4.0 and above for good almonds has been formed to results in a 100% rejection rate of almonds damaged by insects and disease, but also results in the rejection of approximately 4% of good almonds. If a lower sorting threshhold of 3.6 and above is utilized for good almonds, about 99% of almonds damaged by insects and disease are rejected, while only about 1% of acceptable almonds are wrongly rejected.

According to this embodiment, a sample that has passed all six criteria discussed above is accepted as a good almond and, in the schematic illustration of FIG. 1, is diverted along path 32 by diverter 28 under the control of the sensor-control/microcomputer 30.

The invention is further illustrated by the following example, which is not intended to be limiting.

EXAMPLE

A mixture of almonds and undesirable materials was sorted by sequentially comparing measured absorptions at a number of near-infrared wavelengths to a successive series of predetermined different absorption criteria according to the flow chart shown in FIG. 2. Each of the six criteria shown in FIG. 2 is described below, along with its success in rejecting various undesirable "trash" materials.

______________________________________ALMOND SORTING CRITERIACriterion 1 - Elimination Of Samples That Are Too OpaqueWavelength 700 nm used to set maximum limit(Log 1/I = 5.92 was maximum allowed)       % AcceptedItem        (Passed to Criterion No. 2)                        % Rejected______________________________________Good Almond 100              0Pits        0                100*Gumballs    88               12Mudballs    1                99Clam Shells 99               1Plastic and Rubber       40               60Bone        37               63Twigs       22               78Pottery     11               89Hull        26               74Glass       99               1Pee Wee's   0                100*Insect and Disease       97               3Magnetic Metal       0                100*Non-magnetic Metal       0                100*______________________________________ *Since 100% rejected, no need to test any further

______________________________________Criterion No. 2 - Elimination Of Samples That Are TooTransparentWavelength 700 nm used to set minimum limit(Log 1/T = 4.25 is minimum allowed)       % AcceptedItem        (Passed to Criterion No. 3)                        % Rejected______________________________________Good Almonds       100              0Gumballs    88               12*Mudballs    1                99*Clam Shells 99                1*Plastic and Rubber       40               60*Bone        37               63*Twigs       11               89*Pottery     4                96**Hulls       26               74*Glass       1                99**Insect and Disease       54               46**______________________________________ *Criterion No. 2 did not help at all **Remaining after Criteria 1 and 2

______________________________________Criterion No. 3 - Oil Plus Oil/Cellulose/ProteinAbsorption Band SortingMulti-term regression performed of: 10 (OD928 -OD850) + 10(OD1000 -OD950). All samples less than a minimum allowablevalue of 1.27 were rejected.       % AcceptedItem        (Passed to Criterion No. 4)                        % Rejected______________________________________Good Almonds       100              0Gumballs    0                100**Mudballs    0                100**Clam Shells 0                100**Plastics and Rubber       1                 99**Bone        0                100**Twigs       0                100**Pottery     1                 99**Hulls       9                 91**Glass       0                100**Insect and Disease       54                46*______________________________________ *Criterion No. 3 did not help **Composite of Criteria Nos. 1, 2, and 3

______________________________________Criterion No. 4 - Oil Absorption Band SortingUsing only oil band; 10 (OD928 -OD850)Good almond is 0.76 L or higher       % AcceptedItem        (Passed to Criterion No. 5)                        % Rejected______________________________________Good Almonds       100              0Plastics and Rubber       1                 99*Pottery     0                100**Hulls       0                100**Insect and Disease       54                46*______________________________________ *Criterion No. 4 did not help **Composite of Criteria Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4

______________________________________Criterion No. 5 - Cellulose Absorption BandUsing only cellulose band: L = 10 (OD1000 -OD950)(Good Almond is 0.50 L or larger)       % AcceptedItem        (Passed to Criterion No. 6)                        % Rejected______________________________________Good Almonds       100              0Plastics and Rubber       0                100%*Insects and Disease       39                61%**______________________________________ **Composite of Criteria #1 through #5.

______________________________________Criterion No. 6 - Subtle Insect/Disease DifferenceUsing wavelength calibration constants determinedfrom stepwise regression of independent samples:Sort = -17.80 - 50.81 (Log 1/T)750 + 24.71 (Log 1/I800+ 160.32 (Log 1/I)825 - 126.21 (Log 1/T)875   %         %         %       %Item    Accepted* Rejected* Accepted**                               Rejected**______________________________________Good    96        4         99      1AlmondsInsect and   0         100       1       99Disease______________________________________ *Using sorting threshold = 4.0 and above for good almonds **Using sorting threshold = 3.6 and above for good almonds.

It can be seen that the present invention provides a method and apparatus for accurately and reliably sorting desired pieces of material from undesirable materials present in a mixture thereof, using near-infrared radiation absorbance measurement.

Since many modifications, variations and changes in detail may be made to the described embodiment, it is intended that all matter in the foregoing description and shown in the accompanying drawings be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3747755 *Dec 27, 1971Jul 24, 1973Massachusetts Inst TechnologyApparatus for determining diffuse and specular reflections of infrared radiation from a sample to classify that sample
US4166540 *Jan 26, 1978Sep 4, 1979A. C. Nielsen CompanyDocument sorter utilizing cascaded sorting steps
US4236640 *Dec 21, 1978Dec 2, 1980The Superior Oil CompanySeparation of nahcolite from oil shale by infrared sorting
US4286327 *Sep 10, 1979Aug 25, 1981Trebor Industries, Inc.Apparatus for near infrared quantitative analysis
US4466076 *Mar 8, 1982Aug 14, 1984Trebor Industries, Inc.Apparatus for near infrared quantitative analysis with temperature variation correction
US4627008 *Apr 25, 1984Dec 2, 1986Trebor Industries, Inc.Optical quantitative analysis using curvilinear interpolation
DE2230724A1 *Jun 23, 1972Sep 6, 1973Weimar Kombinat VebVerfahren und vorrichtung zur sortierung von landwirtschaftlichen produkten nach ihrer qualitaet
EP0064842A1 *Apr 29, 1982Nov 17, 1982Sphere Investments LimitedMaterial sorting
EP0247016A2 *May 20, 1987Nov 25, 1987Agec AbA method and a device for assortment of a product flow
FR2430272A1 * Title not available
GB2172699A * Title not available
SU925426A1 * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5010247 *Oct 6, 1989Apr 23, 1991Spandrel EstablishmentMethod of classifying objects according to shape
US5077477 *Dec 12, 1990Dec 31, 1991Richard StromanMethod and apparatus for detecting pits in fruit
US5134291 *Apr 30, 1991Jul 28, 1992The Dow Chemical CompanyRecycling, measurement of diffuse reflection spectra
US5292855 *Feb 18, 1993Mar 8, 1994Eastman Kodak CompanyWater-dissipatable polyesters and amides containing near infrared fluorescent compounds copolymerized therein
US5326311 *Dec 19, 1990Jul 5, 1994Stork Pmt B.V.Method for controlling the processing of poultry, and device for carrying out this method
US5336714 *Dec 30, 1993Aug 9, 1994Eastman Chemical CompanyCoatings, inks, markings for detection or identification
US5397819 *Nov 24, 1993Mar 14, 1995Eastman Chemical CompanyThermoplastic materials containing near infrared fluorophores
US5423432 *May 5, 1994Jun 13, 1995Eastman Chemical CompanyWater-dissipatable polyesters and amides containing near infrared fluorescent compounds copolymerized therein
US5461136 *Jun 27, 1994Oct 24, 1995Eastman Chemical CompanyMethod for tagging thermoplastic materials with near infrared fluorophores
US5501344 *Apr 14, 1995Mar 26, 1996Rwe EntsorgungProcess for the identification of randomly shaped and/or plane materials by determination of the structure of the materials through application of electromagnetic and/or acoustic waves
US5553714 *Nov 14, 1994Sep 10, 1996Eastman Chemical CompanyMethod for detecting and separating thermoplastic containers with near infrared fluorosphores
US5703229 *Feb 29, 1996Dec 30, 1997Eastman Chemical CompanyMethod for tagging thermoplastic materials with near infrared fluorophores
US5883388 *Sep 5, 1995Mar 16, 1999Gersan EstablishmentExamining a diamond
US5900634 *Apr 22, 1996May 4, 1999Soloman; SabrieInfrared spectroscopy apparatus
US5966218 *Jul 11, 1997Oct 12, 1999Philip Morris IncorporatedBobbin optical inspection system
US6020969 *Jul 11, 1997Feb 1, 2000Philip Morris IncorporatedCigarette making machine including band inspection
US6075882 *Jun 18, 1997Jun 13, 2000Philip Morris IncorporatedSystem and method for optically inspecting cigarettes by detecting the lengths of cigarette sections
US6138913 *Nov 5, 1997Oct 31, 2000Isotag Technology, Inc.Security document and method using invisible coded markings
US6184373Sep 3, 1999Feb 6, 2001Eastman Chemical CompanyPreparing fibrillated cellulosic materials; mixing cellulose ester and coagulant in turbulence, pass slurry through second and third zones and recover fibrillated cellulosic materials
US6188079 *Jan 12, 1999Feb 13, 2001Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.Measurement of hot container wall thickness
US6198102Jun 17, 1998Mar 6, 2001Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc.Inspection of container mouth using infrared energy emitted by the container bottom
US6198537Jul 11, 1997Mar 6, 2001Philip Morris IncorporatedOptical inspection system for the manufacture of banded cigarette paper
US6217794Apr 30, 1999Apr 17, 2001Isotag Technology, Inc.Fiber coating composition having an invisible marker and process for making same
US6559655Apr 30, 2001May 6, 2003Zeltex, Inc.System and method for analyzing agricultural products on harvesting equipment
US6741876Aug 31, 2000May 25, 2004Cme Telemetrix Inc.Method for determination of analytes using NIR, adjacent visible spectrum and discrete NIR wavelenths
US6749810 *Jun 19, 2001Jun 15, 2004Gary W. Clem, Inc.Method and apparatus for presenting grain for NIR spectography examination
US7288768 *Jul 10, 2003Oct 30, 2007Purdue Research FoundationMethod for measuring the amount of an organic substance in a food product with infrared electromagnetic radiation
DE4312915A1 *Apr 10, 1993Oct 13, 1994Laser Labor Adlershof GmbhProcess and arrangement for the IR (infrared) spectroscopic separation of plastics
WO1997040361A1 *Apr 21, 1997Oct 30, 1997Sabrie SolomanReal-time on-line analysis of organic and non-organic compounds for food, fertilizers and pharmaceutical products
Classifications
U.S. Classification209/577, 250/910, 250/341.7, 250/339.12, 250/339.06
International ClassificationB07C5/342
Cooperative ClassificationY10S250/91, B07C5/3425
European ClassificationB07C5/342D
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 5, 2001FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Oct 9, 1997FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Jan 13, 1994ASAssignment
Owner name: ZELTEX, INC., MARYLAND
Free format text: NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT;ASSIGNOR:TREBOR INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:006831/0643
Effective date: 19940107
Sep 29, 1993FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Feb 4, 1992CCCertificate of correction
May 19, 1988ASAssignment
Owner name: TREBOR INDUSTRIES, INC., P.O. BOX 2159, GAITHERSBU
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:ROSENTHAL, ROBERT D.;REEL/FRAME:004890/0388
Effective date: 19880509
Owner name: TREBOR INDUSTRIES, INC., MARYLAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROSENTHAL, ROBERT D.;REEL/FRAME:004890/0388