|Publication number||US4988060 A|
|Application number||US 07/489,286|
|Publication date||Jan 29, 1991|
|Filing date||Mar 5, 1990|
|Priority date||Mar 4, 1989|
|Also published as||DE3907063A1, DE3907063C2|
|Publication number||07489286, 489286, US 4988060 A, US 4988060A, US-A-4988060, US4988060 A, US4988060A|
|Inventors||Juergen Janson, Otto-Heinz Gruber, Roland Cosaert|
|Original Assignee||Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (5), Referenced by (24), Classifications (11), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention relates to a solar collector panel arrangement with partly and fully foldable panels, especially for use in spacecraft, whereby the panels are interconnected by hinges to form panel wings.
Solar collector panel arrangements of the type just mentioned are, for example, described in German Patent Publication No. 3,615,264. Dividing the solar cell surface into two symmetrically arranged solar generator wings has proven itself in practical terms in the past and is used frequently. Comparing the fully folded state of the solar generator wings on the one hand with the fully unfolded state of the wings on the other hand, it is noted that the center of gravity of the solar generator and thus of the spacecraft such as a satellite, is substantially unchanged in both circumstances. The kinematic elements for the folding and unfolding, including the enforced control of the folding and unfolding, are known, for example, as a CCL.
In certain flight phases it may be sufficient to supply the spacecraft with a reduced solar power. For this purpose it is customary that only one wing is unfolded or that only a few outer panels near the panel wing tips of both solar generator wings are partially unfolded. Such a state of operation is shown, for example, in FIG. 1 of the above mentioned German Patent Publication (DE-OS) No. 3,615,264. It is clear that the one-sided position of a partially unfolded panel leads to a noticeable displacement of the center of gravity of the solar generator and thus of the satellite. The satellites have, as a rule, a rocket drive, also referred to as apogee motor or engine, for the purpose of reaching the intended orbit after separation from the last rocket stage. The axis of the apogee motor extends normally through the center of gravity of the spacecraft or satellite, whereby the center of gravity is determined or given by the folded or fully unfolded condition of the solar generator wings. If the apogee motor is switched on for an acceleration while the solar generator wings are partially unfolded, a torque moment is generated due to the mentioned displacement of the center of gravity. Such torque moment may, for example, be a yawing moment about the axis of the solar generator. Such a moment must be sensed by the position control system of the spacecraft so that it can be compensated. The compensation may, for example, be accomplished by tilting the apogee motor, by switching-on auxiliary engines, by causing a mass displacement, or by producing other counter moments, for example, with the aid of a gyro. However, all these measures increase the requirements that must be met by the position closed loop control system. As a result, such a system becomes more complicated, more expensive, and heavier. The more complicated system is also subject to a larger probability of failure. Incidentally, the above German Patent Publication corresponds to U.S. Pat. No. 4,747,566 (Kiendl).
In view of the above it is the aim of the invention to achieve the following objects singly or in combination:
to avoid the drawbacks of the prior art, more specifically, to arrange the panels forming the solar collector wings in such a way that their unfolding, especially the partial unfolding substantially avoids any center of gravity displacements, so that the closed loop position control system may be simplified;
to maintain the total or overall center of gravity of the spacecraft, including that of the solar generator wings substantially unchanged in all three positions of the solar generator wings, namely the fully folded or stored position, the partially unfolded condition, and the fully unfolded position;
to make sure that the mounting elements of the panels have a minimal influence on the location of the center of gravity even if these mounting elements have a nonsymmetrical position in the fully folded state; and
to arrange the panels of a wing in such a way that for a partially unfolded wing the total or overall center of gravity remains on a central axis of the spacecraft.
According to a first embodiment of the invention, the solar generator wings or rather the panels of these wings are hinged to one another in such a manner that the panels can be folded in opposite directions and so that the partially unfolded panels of one wing extend in parallel and displaced relative to the partially unfolded panels of the other wing, whereby the panel planes are displaced or spaced from each other by a panel length. In this type of arrangement the total or overall center of gravity of the satellite or spacecraft with its solar generator wings remains unchanged when the panels are partially unfolded as compared to the fully folded or stored condition, or as compared to the fully unfolded condition. The center of gravity always remains in the same position
According to another embodiment of the invention the partially unfoldable panels at the outer tip of the panel wing is hinged to the neighboring fully unfoldable panel by two parallel hinging axes, rather than being hinged directly by a single axis. This type of hinging of the partially foldable outer panels of the inner edge of the partially unfolded outer panel, to a center line of the neighboring panel, which is only completely unfoldable, keeps the partially unfolded outer panel or panels in a plane through which the longitudinal central system axis of the entire solar generator wing extends. The mass of the mounting hinging means is relatively small compared to the mass of the panels so that even when the panels are in the fully folded nonsymmetric condition, there is practically no displacement of the overall or total center of gravity.
According to a third embodiment of the invention the fully unfoldable panel radially inwardly next to the partially unfoldable outer panel assumes a slanted position relative to a central axis so that the total or overall center of gravity of the mass system of the two panels, namely the slanted panel and the partially unfolded panel, remains located on the longitudinal central axis of the solar generated wing.
In order that the invention may be clearly understood, it will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic plan view in the direction of the hinging axes extending perpendicularly to the plane of the drawing of a spacecraft with partially unfolded solar generator wings;
FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of a second embodiment in which the solar panel wings are partially unfolded, and wherein two parallel hinging axes are employed for securing the outer tip panel to the next inward panel;
FIG. 3 is a perspective view similar to that of FIG. 2, however, showing the second embodiment with a fully unfolded solar generator wing; and
FIG. 4 illustrates schematically a third embodiment of the invention in which the tip panel extends partially unfolded in parallel to a central system axis while the next inner fully unfoldable panel extends at a slant relative to the central system axis.
FIG. 5 illustrates the fully unfolded state of the embodiment of FIG. 4.
The arrangement of FIG. 1 comprises a spacecraft 4 having a longitudinal system axis 4' which is assumed to be oriented in the Y-direction. The spacecraft 4 has a center of gravity S. The spacecraft 4 carries two sets of solar collector panels. The first set with panels 10 and 11 forms a first solar generator wing 6. The second set with panels 12 and 13 forms a second solar generator wing 7. The axially outermost panels 10 and 12 are shown in their unfolded condition while the plurality of panels 11 and the plurality of panels 13 are shown in the still folded condition, or stacked condition.
All panels are hinged to each other in a wing by hinging means A. Each hinging means A of conventional construction has a hinging axis extending perpendicularly to the plane of the drawing. The hinging axis between the axially outermost unfolded solar panel 10 and the neighboring axially next folded panel 11 is shown at A, 10, 11. The hinging axis between the unfolded panel 12 and the axially inward neighboring panel 13 is shown at A, 12, 13. The wing 6 is mounted to the spacecraft 4 by a mounting mechanism 24 also having hinging axes extending in parallel to all the other hinging axes. The panel wing 7 is mounted to the spacecraft 4 by a mounting mechanism 25 having a respective hinging axis in parallel to the other hinging axis. The mounting mechanism 24 is located diagonally opposite the mounting mechanism 25. Similarly, the unfolded panel 10 is located diagonally opposite the unfolded panel 12, whereby the symmetry required for keeping the center of gravity relatively stationary within the spacecraft 4 is assured even when only two panels are unfolded as shown at 10 and 12.
When all the panels are unfolded, they will extend approximately in a common plane coinciding with the Y-axis. If the spacecraft 4 should, for example, be a geostationary satellite, it is advantageous that the solar panel wings 6 and 7 could rotate about the axis 4' so that the wings can track or follow the sun for optimizing the energy collected in the course of a day. It is an advantage of the invention that the just described system, including the spacecraft 4 and the solar collector panel wings 6 and 7, maintains the center of gravity S in the same position, not only when the panels are fully folded, but also when the panels are fully unfolded and, most important, when the panels are only partially unfolded, as shown in FIG. 1. This advantage of the invention is important because it substantially simplifies the closed loop position control of the system when accelerations or decelerations must be applied to the spacecraft. The just described feature is assured by the fact that the axis A10, 11 is diagonally opposite the axis A12, 13 and similarly, the mounting mechanism 24 is located diagonally opposite the mounting mechanism 25 as described. In such an arrangement, the dimensions of the individual panels, especially their length 111 is so selected that a line connecting, for example, the center of gravity of the panel 10 in its unfolded state with the center of gravity of the panel 12 in its unfolded state still passes through the main center of gravity S. Similarly, a line connecting the hinging axes A10, 11 with the hinging axes A12, 13, also passes through the center of gravity S. When all the panels are folded, the line connecting the individual gravity centers also passes through the main gravity center S. Further, the plane defined by the panel 10 in its unfolded state extends in parallel to the plane defined by the panel 12 in its unfolded state. Further, the spacing between the just mentioned planes corresponds to 111, the length of all the panels.
The solar collector cells 20 on the panel 10 face in the same direction as the solar cells 21 on the panel 12. However, the panel 12 also has solar cells 22 on its backside, so to speak, and these cells 22 face in an opposite direction.
The system illustrated in FIG. 1 is not limited to partially unfolding merely one panel in each wing. For example, it is possible to partially unfold the panels 10 and 11 of the wing 6, and the panels 12 and 13 of the wing 7. In that case, the panels 10 and 11 would be located in plane P while panels 12 and 13 would be located in plane P1. The above mentioned diagonal connecting lines would still pass through the main center of gravity S which is thus maintained substantially unchanged in its original position. When all the panels are unfolded, they would extend in a plane substantially coinciding with a system axis 4'. In FIG. 1 neighboring panels fold in opposite directions FIGS. 2 and 3 show a second embodiment of the invention, whereby the perspective illustration shows only one panel wing 16 while the other panel wing which is arranged mirror-symmetrically on the other side of the spacecraft 5 is not shown for simplicity's sake. The construction of both wings is identical. FIG. 2 shows the partially unfolded state while FIG. 3 shows the fully unfolded wing 8. In both instances, the center of gravity S of the entire system remains in its original position. In this second embodiment 2 the panel 14 axially at the outer tip of the wing 8 is secured to its neighboring panel 15 by pivoting mounting brackets 26 defining two hinging axes V and W. These hinging axes V and W are spaced from each other by a spacing a corresponding approximately to one half of the panel length L14 as measured in the Y-direction. Preferably, all panels 14, 15, 16, and so forth have the same axial length L14.
The hinging axes V extends along an axially inner edge of the outermost tip panel 14. The hinging axis W extends through the center of the panel 15 which, to be effective, must be fully unfolded. The panels 15 and 16 are hinged to each other along their edges at 15'. The panel 16 is hinged at 16' to the panel 17. The panel 17 is hinged at 17' to a mounting mechanism 27. The mounting mechanism 27 has a hinging axis 27' and a further hinging axis 27" connecting the mounting mechanism 27 to the spacecraft 5. The axial spacing between the hinging axis 17' and the hinging axis 27' corresponds to the axial length L14. The axial spacing between the hinging axis 27' and 27" corresponds to the spacing a. Thus, the mounting mechanism 27 can be folded onto itself, so to speak. Spacing a 1/2= of L14.
FIGS. 2 and 3 show that the axially outer panel 14 always extends in the plane passing through the Y-direction when the wing 8 is partially unfolded as shown in FIG. 2, and when the wing 8 is fully unfolded as shown in FIG. 3. The above described dimensions make sure that the individual center of gravity of the panel stack 8' including the mounting mechanism, is also located on the axis in the Y-direction. As a result, the overall center of gravity S is not shifted and it remains in the same position in FIGS. 2 and 3. However, in the fully folded condition, the mounting brackets 26 introduce a certain nonsymmetry which actually is negligible with regard to its influence on the position of the center of gravity S, because the mass of the brackets 26 is small relative to the mass of the panels. Additionally, the influence of the brackets 26 can be further reduced by arranging the brackets of the two wings in such a way, that in the fully folded condition of the system the brackets of one wing extend in one direction away from the system axis 4' while the brackets 26 of the other wing extends away from the axis 4' in the opposite direction. The same has been shown for the mounting mechanisms 24 and 25 in FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 illustrates a third embodiment according to the invention, whereby only one solar generator panel wing 9 is illustrated. The other wing and the spacecraft itself are not shown. The wing 9 comprises an axially outer partially unfoldable collector panel 17a and a plurality of only fully unfoldable panels 18, 19 and so forth. The outermost panel 17a is only partially unfoldable. The panel 17a is connected to the group of fully unfoldable panels 19 by an intermediate panel 18 which is either partially unfoldable as shown in FIG. 4, or it is fully unfoldable. For this purpose, the panels 17a and 18 are hinged to each other at a hinging axis A17,18 and the panel 18 is hinged to the outermost panel of the still folded group of panels 19 at the hinging axis A18,19. In the position shown in FIG. 4, the intermediate panel 18 is arrestable in the shown slanted position at an angle α between the panel 18 and the panel 19. The panel 19, or rather, the group of still folded panels 19, extend at a right angle to the system axis 4'. The partially unfolded panel 17a extends in parallel to the Y-direction and thus in parallel to the system axis 4' so that the panel 17a in its partially unfolded state extends also at a right angle to the panel 19. Thus, the angle δ between the panels 17a and 18 corresponds to δ=90°+α.
Assuming that the center of gravity of the still stacked or fully folded panels 19 is located on the Y-axis, the angle α is so selected that the center of gravity S17, 18 of the mass system comprising the panels 17a and 18 is also located on the system axis 4'.
The following assumptions shall be applicable for the following calculations. The centers of gravity S17 of the panel 17a and S18 of the panel 18 shall be located in the center of the panel length 117 and 118 respectively. The tilting axes A17,18 and A18,19 are located centrally in the longitudinal central axis of the respective panels 17a and 18. The thickness of the panels 17a and 18 is so small that it is negligible compared to the length 117 and 118.
Further, m17 is the mass of the panel 17a including its hinges. m18 is the mass of the panel 18, including its hinges. x17 is the spacing of the center of gravity S17 of the panel 17a from the system axis 4' extending in the Y-direction.
x18 is the spacing of the center of gravity S18 of the panel 18 from the system axis 4'. The X-axis shown in FIG. 4 extends perpendicularly to the Y-direction and thus perpendicularly to the system axis 4'. The total center of gravity S17,18 of the panels 17a and 18 is located precisely on the system axis 4' if the following condition is satisfied:
m17 ·x17 =m18 ·x18
The still stacked panels 19 also shall have all the same length 118 which is abbreviated in the following equations simply as 1:
x17 =1/2·(2 cos α-1)
x18 =1/2·(1- cos α).
By inserting these equations into the above given moment equilibrium condition, and by simplifying the equations, we obtain: ##EQU1## Assuming that the panels 17a and 18 have the same mass m17 =m18, we obtain:
If, for example, two panels are unfolded, it is possible to combine the mass of the two panels for the purposes of calculation, whereby m17 becomes twice as large as m18. (m17 =2·m18). In which case we obtain for α and δ:
cos α=3/5 ;
Actual embodiments of this type of construction must take into account that the panels have a certain thickness and that they can be stacked flat one against the other. Stated differently, the hinging axis will have to be located along a corner of the respective panel rather than in its center plane, unless special hinge structures are used. When the hinges are located along a panel edge, there will be certain deviations from the above shown calculation of the angles. However, such deviations are negligibly small for actual panels thicknesses. FIG. 5 shows the fully unfolded state of the embodiment of FIG. 4. Although the invention has been described with reference to specific example embodiments it will be appreciated that it is intended to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US437113 *||May 27, 1889||Sep 23, 1890||Harvesting-machine|
|US4747566 *||May 5, 1987||May 31, 1988||Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm Gmbh||Apparatus for partially unfolding solar collectors|
|DE2604005A1 *||Feb 3, 1976||Aug 11, 1977||Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm||Einrichtung zur beeinflussung der position und lage eines satelliten|
|DE3615264A1 *||May 6, 1986||Nov 12, 1987||Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm||Vorrichtung fuer die teilentfaltung von solargeneratoren|
|EP0120662A1 *||Mar 19, 1984||Oct 3, 1984||British Aerospace Public Limited Company||Spacecraft|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5133518 *||Dec 21, 1990||Jul 28, 1992||Societe Nationale Industrielle Et Aerospatiale||Attitude control device using solar sails for a satellite stabilized on three axes|
|US5522569 *||Feb 4, 1994||Jun 4, 1996||Orbital Sciences Corporation||Satellite having a stackable configuration|
|US5641135 *||May 5, 1994||Jun 24, 1997||Teledesic Corporation||Inflatable torus and collapsible hinged disc spacecraft designs for satellite communication system|
|US5785280 *||Jul 20, 1995||Jul 28, 1998||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Hybrid solar panel array|
|US5833175 *||Dec 22, 1995||Nov 10, 1998||Hughes Electronics Corporation||Spacecraft with large east-west dimensions|
|US5927654 *||May 16, 1997||Jul 27, 1999||Lockheed Martin Corp.||Spacecraft with active antenna array protected against temperature extremes|
|US6010096 *||Jul 22, 1998||Jan 4, 2000||Space Systems/Loral, Inc.||Deployment restraint and sequencing device|
|US6118067 *||Nov 20, 1998||Sep 12, 2000||Swales Aerospace||Method and apparatus for improved solar concentration arrays|
|US6168116 *||Jun 21, 1999||Jan 2, 2001||Trw Astro Aerospace||Shear tie device|
|US6284967||Dec 3, 1999||Sep 4, 2001||Daimlerchrysler Ag||Solar generator with foldable panels especially for a spacecraft|
|US6429368 *||Mar 20, 2001||Aug 6, 2002||Trw Inc.||Shortened solar cell array|
|US6581883 *||Jul 13, 2001||Jun 24, 2003||The Boeing Company||Extendable/retractable bi-fold solar array|
|US6722614 *||Aug 15, 2002||Apr 20, 2004||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Satellite deployment structure|
|US8622454||Jul 28, 2010||Jan 7, 2014||Micah F. Andretich||Mobile structure having sufficient internal structural rigidity to eliminate need for load-bearing perimeter support structures|
|US8720125||Jul 27, 2010||May 13, 2014||Micah F. Andretich||Sustainable, mobile, expandable structure|
|US9132764||Jan 6, 2014||Sep 15, 2015||Micah F. Andretich||Portable structure having sufficient internal structural rigidity to eliminate load-bearing perimeter support structures|
|US20030173467 *||Aug 15, 2002||Sep 18, 2003||Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha||Satellite deployment structure|
|US20060225781 *||Apr 3, 2006||Oct 12, 2006||Steve Locher||Portable solar panel with attachment points|
|US20110023863 *||Jul 28, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Andretich Micah F||Solar collector support wings for efficient storage and deployment of solar collectors on a mobile structure|
|US20110023864 *||Jul 28, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Andretich Micah F||Solar collector support system for efficient storage, transport, and deployment of an expandable array of rotatable solar collectors|
|US20110025101 *||Jul 28, 2010||Feb 3, 2011||Andretich Micah F||Mobile structure with ample interior space unobstructed by structural members|
|CN103662098A *||Aug 31, 2012||Mar 26, 2014||上海宇航系统工程研究所||Semi-rigid solar battery wing of spacecraft|
|CN103978908A *||May 21, 2014||Aug 13, 2014||陈绪跃||Solar battery flap mechanism and solar electric car|
|CN103978908B *||May 21, 2014||Dec 23, 2015||陈绪跃||太阳能电池翻板机构及太阳能电动汽车|
|U.S. Classification||244/172.6, 136/292, 136/245|
|International Classification||B64G1/44, H01L31/042, B64G1/22|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S136/292, B64G1/222, B64G1/44|
|European Classification||B64G1/22D, B64G1/44|
|Sep 4, 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MESSERSCHMITT-BOELKOW-BLOHM GMBH, GERMANY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:JANSON, JUERGEN;GRUBER, OTTO-HEINZ;COSAERT, ROLAND;REEL/FRAME:005424/0545
Effective date: 19900228
|Jun 16, 1992||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Sep 6, 1994||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jan 29, 1995||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Apr 11, 1995||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19950202