|Publication number||US4990359 A|
|Application number||US 07/435,570|
|Publication date||Feb 5, 1991|
|Filing date||Nov 13, 1989|
|Priority date||Nov 13, 1989|
|Publication number||07435570, 435570, US 4990359 A, US 4990359A, US-A-4990359, US4990359 A, US4990359A|
|Inventors||Alan J. Knobbe|
|Original Assignee||Nordson Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (11), Referenced by (13), Classifications (19), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to the application of coatings to substrates and more particularly to a method and apparatus for redistributing a coating applied to the substrate subsequent to its application to the substrate to render the coating more uniform.
The uniformity of the coatings applied to manufactured objects and other substrates by various coating processes has been a long sought objective of the coating processes of the prior art. Various types of coating processes apply coating materials in ways which do not initially result in the desired uniformity of the thickness of the coating across the substrate. In many circumstances, the lack of desired uniformity is at least partially due to the shape of the object being coated. In electrostatic coating processes, for example, objects having corners, raised portions with short radii, or other projecting portions cause a concentration of the electrostatic field at such portions and this concentration causes a non-uniform deposition of the charged coating material. This results in a greater applied coating thickness at the more highly charged raised areas than is distributed by the electrostatic coating process elsewhere on the coated substrate. If allowed to solidify in its non-uniform state, the applied coating retains an irregular thickness. With most coating processes of the prior art, the irregular thickness of coating is tolerated and more than the ideal amount of coating material is applied to compensate for, and adequately cover, the more thinly coated regions.
The problem of non-uniform application of coating materials is not unique to electrostatic coating processes. In dip-coating processes, for example, the effect which substrate shape has on non-uniformities in the thickness of applied coatings is often even more of a problem than with electrostatic coating processes. The non-uniform thickness thus caused usually correlates with the characteristic contours of the object surface, tending to coat quite thinly at corners and raised areas of the substrate surface.
A serious problem is found to occur in applying coatings to running lengths of wire by dipping the wire into the coating material. In such applications, it is often the objective to apply an insulative coating to the wire. To insulate efficiently, the coating must achieve a minimum thickness everywhere across the surface. Excess coating at any point provides no advantage. The wire, if of a non-round cross-section, such as rectangular wire, has surface non-uniformities such as corners, ridges, or regions with short radii which will collect coating which is thinner in the regions of the corners of the wire, or in regions of shorter radii, than it is at the smoother or flat sides between the corners. The tendency of the flowable liquid dip coating material to thin out at the raised corners of the object is a common occurrence with dip coating processes. The non-uniform thickness of coatings so applied is usually attributed to the effect of the surface tension of the liquid coating. If allowed to solidify in the non-uniform condition, which most prior art processes cannot avoid, an inferior irregular thickness of the coating results. To prevent some regions from having a coating which is too thin, more coating than necessary is used to coat the flatter regions of the substrate surface so that an adequate minimum thickness is assured at the corners.
While various efforts have been made to control the deposition rate of coating material differently onto different regions of the object or substrate during application of the coating, the processes have been complex and expensive, and their results have at least partially been unsatisfactory. Objects nonetheless continue to be coated in the various commercial processes, such as the examples described above, with coatings which are not uniform particularly where substrate geometry which presents corners or other non-uniform surface curvature is involved.
It is a primary objective of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus by which coating material which has been applied with non-uniform thickness to a substrate may be satisfactorily redistributed on the substrate surface to render the coating more uniform, and to do so particularly while the coating is still flowable and before it solidifies on the substrate.
According to the principles of the present invention, substrate objects which have been coated with a coating material and which is distributed across the substrate surface with a thickness which is not uniform are subjected to a post-deposition application of electrostatic force to redistribute the coating on the substrate. Where such non-uniformity in coating thickness is due to substrate surface geometry of non-uniform curvature, the post deposition process applies the electrostatic force in accordance with the substrate geometry. In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the non-uniformly applied coating is redistributed by the application of electrostatic force to move the deposited and still flowable coating so as to urge the coating to flow on the surface from the thicker to the more thinly coated areas. In this manner, the irregularly deposited coating is rendered more uniform.
The post deposition process for redistributing the coating is accomplished with the present invention by electrostatically charging and then attracting or repelling the deposited coating to redistribute it on the substrate surface. With the present invention, the electrostatic forces which cause the redistribution of the coating may be, and preferably are, related to the geometry of the object. This was in part at least responsible for the non-uniformity of the coating. Thus, the forces which accomplish the corrective flow can be made to offset the initial non-uniformity in thickness by configuration of the forces to correspond in both polarity and magnitude to the non-uniformities in geometry.
According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the liquid or flowable coating which has been deposited onto the object is, prior to the solidification of the coating, imparted with an electrostatic charge. This charge is preferably a negative charge and preferably applied with a corona discharge method. Once the coating is charged, the coated object is passed to a station at which the different portions of the substrate surface, as for example the raised corners of a rectangular dip coated wire, and brought into proximity with electrostatically charged electrodes shaped and configured to interact with the charged coating selectively at the different regions on the substrate which correspond to the geometric features which correlate with the thickness variations to be corrected.
For example, in the case of the dip coated rectangular wire, the electrodes are selectively positioned adjacent the raised corners of the dip coated wire and are charged opposite to the charge imparted to the flowable insulative coating on the substrate, to attract and thereby force the non-solidified coating to flow toward the thinly coated corners and thereby to cause the overall coating to become more uniform. Particularly, in the case of dip coated wire of rectangular cross section which will have a tendency, when dip coated, to emerge from a coating tank with a thinner coating at its corners, the electrodes positioned proximate to the wire corners will be charged to the opposite charge as that imparted to the coating so as to attract coating from the thicker coating region between the corners toward the more thinly coated corners, causing the coating to flow and become more uniform in thickness before it solidifies.
Similarly, where a liquid or other flowable coating is electrostatically applied to a coated object it will often have a tendency to attract a thicker coating at its raised portions. In such an application of the principles of the present invention, electrodes are positioned adjacent the raised portions and imparted with a charge which is the same as that charge imparted to the coating. The forces so generated will thus repel the coating from the more thickly coated areas at the raised regions, thus causing it to flow toward the more thinly coated flat regions so as to render the coating more uniform across the substrate.
According to principles of the present invention, an object coated with a method which is a simple straightforward coating method, but which has a tendency to apply a non-uniform coating to substrates because of the geometry of the substrate surface, can be subsequently processed so as to cause the coating to be redistributed and rendered more uniform in thickness. This coating distribution is achieved by charging the coating which has been applied to the substrate and then passing the object, while the coating is still flowable, through a coating redistribution station immediately following the coating process and prior to the solidification of the coating.
These and other objectives and advantages of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a dip coating process for rectangular cross-section wire which embodies the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view along line 2--2 of FIG. 1 showing the irregular distribution of flowable coating on the wire as it emerges from the coating station in the process of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a drawing similar to FIG. 2 taken along line 3--3 of FIG. 1 showing the distribution of coating on a rectangular wire after being subjected to the coating redistribution steps according to principles of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view and diagram showing a charging station of the process of FIG. 1 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a partially schematic diagram in cross-sectional view illustrating an electrostatic coating redistribution station portion of the system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a diagram similar to FIG. 5 illustrating an alternative embodiment of the invention.
Referring to FIG. 1, a dip coating system 10 for applying a coating to a running length of wire 12 is shown. In the system 10, a dip tank 14 containing a powder slurry of coating material 16 is diagrammatically illustrated. The wire 12 is electrically conductive. The coating material 16 is generally a material which forms a high resistance coating when deposited upon the wire to provide electrical insulation. However, other coatings applied for other purposes onto other types of substrates may be redistributed according to the present invention.
In the dip coating process performed with the system 10, a continuous length of the wire 12 is longitudinally advanced, usually guided by rollers represented schematically in the drawing as 18a, 18b and 18c, is fed longitudinally through the coating material 16 to emerge therefrom having a moderately flowable non-solidified coating 20 thereon as illustrated in FIG. 2. As will be seen in FIG. 2, the coating 20 is of non-uniform thickness about the surface of the wire 12. This phenomenon is generally regarded as due to the surface tension of the liquid coating which gives the coating a tendency to assume a generally round cross-section even though the substrate or wire 12 on which the coating material 20 is applied is not of round cross-section.
The wire 12 in the application shown in the figures is of rectangular cross-section having flat sides 21 separated by right angle corners 22. As is typical in a coating process of the dip coating type, the coating material 20 will encircle the cross-section of the wire 12 to develop a minimum surface area. This tends to produce a coating distribution which is thickest at regions central to the sides 21 and thinnest in regions adjacent the outside corners 22 of the wire 12.
The preferred and ideal coating, on the other hand, is such as that illustrated in FIG. 3 wherein the coating 20 is shown distributed in accordance with the present invention such that the thickness is approximately the same in the vicinity of the corner regions 22 of the wire 12 as it is adjacent the flat sides 21 of the wire 12. The uniformity of the coating shown in FIG. 3 is the result of the inventive concepts set forth in connection with the description of FIGS. 1, 4 and 5.
Referring to FIGS. 1 and 4, immediately after emerging from the dip tank 14, the coating 20 on the wire 12 is still non-solidified and flowable. At this point, high voltage is applied through a corona discharge device 30 positioned adjacent the wire 12 at a charging station 32 to impart a negative electrostatic charge 33 to the coating 20 on the wire 12 as the wire 12 advances longitudinally from the tank 14 toward a dryer station 34 downstream. Adjacent the station 32 is a grounded plate 36 to collect the charge 37 which is excessively produced by the device 30 and fails to collect upon the coating 20 of the wire 12 at the station 32. Preferably, the wire 12 and the tank 14 and coating 16 thereon are also maintained at ground potential so that the wire 12 with the coating 20 thereon emerges from the tank 14 at ground potential and will thus attract the charge 33. The coating 20 which is usually of insulative material will hold the charge 33 on its outer surfaces.
As the wire 12 continues to advance through the charging station 32 and emerges with its coating 20 charged to negative potential, the wire 12 passes through a coating redistribution station 40 illustrated by reference to FIGS. 1 and 5. Referring to FIG. 5, at the coating redistribution station 40 is provided a plurality of shaped electrodes 42 positioned adjacent the path of the wire 12 so as to be in closest proximity to the coating 20 at the corners 22 of the wire 12. Connected to the electrodes 42 is a source of high voltage dc energy designed to impart a high voltage positive electric potential, of for example 90 thousand volts, on the electrodes 42. As seen by reference to FIG. 5, these electrodes 42, so charged and so positioned with respect to the surface geometry of the wire 12, generate electrostatic attracting forces represented by field lines 46 which attract the negatively charged coating 20 and draw it toward the corners 22 of the wire 12 from adjacent the flat sides 21 where the coating 20 is more thickly deposited. As such, the wire 12 emerges from the coating redistribution station 40 with the coating 20 redistributed approximately as shown in FIG. 3. Before the coated wire leaves the influence of the electrostatic field 46 of the coating redistribution station 40, the coating is passed into the dryer station 34 where the non-solidified and still flowable coating 20 solidifies in the condition shown in FIG. 3, thus uniformly coating the wire 12.
It will be appreciated from the teachings set forth above that, while attractive forces are used at the redistributing station 40 to redistribute the charged flowable coating 20 on the wire 12, differently positioned electrodes 42 oppositely charged to have the same charge as the coating 20 could effectively repel coating material and thereby redistribute the coating 20. Such an arrangement is illustrated, for example, in FIG. 6 wherein the power supply 44a imposes a negative charge on electrodes 42a to repel the thick portions of the coating adjacent the flat sides 21 of the wire 12 to the corners 22. With coating processes such as electrostatic spray coating processes which have a tendency to deposit thicker coatings at the raised regions, the electrode configuration of FIG. 5 can similarly be used to repel the coating from the corners 22 toward the flat sides 21 of the wire 20. Because it may in many applications be easier to conform the external electrodes 42 to exert properly shaped fields adjacent raised regions of the object rather than to employ electrodes such as 42a (FIG. 6) adjacent the lowered regions on the surface of the substrate, in such applications repulsive forces instead of attraction forces will often be more desirable.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2428991 *||Jan 22, 1944||Oct 14, 1947||Harper J Ransburg Company||Apparatus for spray coating articles|
|US2636471 *||Oct 10, 1946||Apr 28, 1953||Ransburg Electro Coating Corp||Electrostatic coating apparatus|
|US3401058 *||Oct 16, 1964||Sep 10, 1968||Westinghouse Electric Corp||Method of coating electrical conductors|
|US4084019 *||Feb 5, 1976||Apr 11, 1978||Armco Steel Corporation||Electrostatic coating grid and method|
|US4169903 *||Jun 10, 1977||Oct 2, 1979||Ball Corporation||Electrostatic process for coating electrically conductive objects such as beverage cans|
|US4343828 *||Dec 24, 1980||Aug 10, 1982||Caterpillar Tractor Co.||Electrodynamic painting system and method|
|US4436763 *||Jan 19, 1983||Mar 13, 1984||Arbed S/A||Method of plating a wire with metal|
|US4472452 *||Jul 30, 1982||Sep 18, 1984||Electrostatic Equipment Corp.||Build control apparatus and method|
|US4513683 *||Apr 4, 1983||Apr 30, 1985||Polaroid Corporation||Coating uniformity improvement apparatus|
|US4514435 *||Apr 6, 1984||Apr 30, 1985||Northern Telecom Limited||Method for production of dielectric insulation layers upon electrical conductors|
|US4606928 *||Mar 7, 1985||Aug 19, 1986||Electrostatic Technology Incorporated||Vortex effect electrostatic fluidized bed coating method and apparatus|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5688563 *||Feb 29, 1996||Nov 18, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Electrostatic system for controlling the flow of a fluid after being coated onto a substrate|
|US5850976 *||Oct 23, 1997||Dec 22, 1998||The Eastwood Company||Powder coating application gun and method for using the same|
|US6368675||Apr 6, 2000||Apr 9, 2002||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatically assisted coating method and apparatus with focused electrode field|
|US6475572||Apr 6, 2000||Nov 5, 2002||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatically assisted coating method with focused web-borne charges|
|US6579574||Apr 24, 2001||Jun 17, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Variable electrostatic spray coating apparatus and method|
|US6666918||Jul 26, 2002||Dec 23, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatically assisted coating apparatus with focused web charge field|
|US6716286||Jan 22, 2002||Apr 6, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatically assisted coating method and apparatus with focused electrode field|
|US6969540||Apr 1, 2004||Nov 29, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatic spray coating apparatus and method|
|US20020192360 *||Apr 24, 2001||Dec 19, 2002||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatic spray coating apparatus and method|
|US20040185180 *||Apr 1, 2004||Sep 23, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Electrostatic spray coating apparatus and method|
|WO1996009124A1 *||Aug 8, 1995||Mar 28, 1996||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Electrostatic system for controlling the flow of a fluid after being coated onto a substrate|
|WO2003076718A2 *||Mar 11, 2003||Sep 18, 2003||Metso Paper, Inc.||A method for treating powdery particles|
|WO2003076718A3 *||Mar 11, 2003||Dec 11, 2003||Pasi Ahonen||A method for treating powdery particles|
|U.S. Classification||427/472, 427/474, 427/120, 427/482|
|International Classification||B05D3/14, H01B13/00, B05D7/20, B05C11/02|
|Cooperative Classification||B05D3/14, B05D2401/32, B05C11/023, B05D3/145, B05D7/20, H01B13/0033|
|European Classification||B05D7/20, B05D3/14, B05C11/02D, H01B13/00S, B05D3/14C5|
|Nov 13, 1989||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NORDSON CORPORATION, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:KNOBBE, ALAN J.;REEL/FRAME:005171/0485
Effective date: 19891101
|Sep 13, 1994||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Feb 5, 1995||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Apr 18, 1995||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 19950208