|Publication number||US5011516 A|
|Application number||US 07/432,068|
|Publication date||Apr 30, 1991|
|Filing date||Nov 6, 1989|
|Priority date||Nov 6, 1989|
|Publication number||07432068, 432068, US 5011516 A, US 5011516A, US-A-5011516, US5011516 A, US5011516A|
|Inventors||Ralph A. Altman, John P. Gooch, Edward B. Dismukes|
|Original Assignee||Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (31), Classifications (5), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention is directed to an improved method for conditioning combustion gas for removal of particulates using electrostatic precipitation. The fly ash is conventionally removed from combustion gases by electrostatic precipitation wherein the surface resistivity of the ash is reduced for efficient precipitation. If a high sulfur-content fuel, such as high sulfur-content coal, is used in the combustor, the concentration of sulfur-containing gases (SOX and in particular SO3) in the combustion gas will usually be sufficient to reduce the resistivity of the fly ash to a level at which the electrostatic precipitator can efficiently function (usually about 5×1010 ohm-cm). However, if the coal used as fuel in the combustor produces combustion gases which contain less than approximately 0.1% of SOX (SO2 +SO3) then the flue gas needs to be augmented with sulfur trioxide (SO3).
One of the methods of making sulfur trioxide is to add ammonium sulfate into the flue system at a temperature above approximately 700° F., where the additive is thermally decomposed to form SO3, ammonia and water. However, the formation of ammonia then creates a different environmental problem. Ammonia may be removed by treating the flue gas with a catalyst which converts ammonia to nitrogen gas.
In Pat. No. 3,581,463, a portion of the flue gas is withdrawn, electrostatically cleaned to remove particulates, then passed through a catalyst chamber to convert sulfur dioxide contained in the flue gas to sulfur trioxide. Then the sulfur trioxide is returned to the main flue gas stream which passes through an electrostatic precipitator. A disadvantage of this method is that the portion of the withdrawn flue gases to be catalytically treated must first be cleaned of the particulate matter, to avoid fouling of the catalytic material.
It is thus an object of the present invention to provide a novel method of conditioning combustion gases by which the combustion gases are not first cleaned of particulate matter. Rather, a portion of the combustion gases is diverted into a slip stream where the gases particulate matter together pass through a catalyst with a particular design wherein a major portion of SO2 in the diverted gases is converted to SO3. The catalyst design has two preferred configurations. The first is a collection of parallel hollow tubes separated by spacers. The second is a honeycomb with parallel passages which can be triangular, rectangular, hexagonal, octagonal, etc., or round.
These and other objects will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments and from the accompanying figures and practice of the invention.
A method is provided to enhance the removal of particulates from a combustion gas by electrostatic precipitation. The improvement comprises the step of withdrawing from a location upstream of the electrostatic precipitator a minor amount of the total volume of the combustion gases entering the flue, including the particulates associated with that minor amount of combustion gases, contacting the minor amount of combustion gases and associated particulates with catalytic means to convert SO2 to SO3 ; and mixing the remainder of the minor amount of withdrawn combustion gases and the SO3 with the main stream of combustion gases and subjecting the mixture to electrostatic precipitation. The catalytic means is disposed within a passage substantially parallel to the flow of the main stream whereby particulates freely flow through the passage without substantially interfering with the catalytic conversion of SO2 to SO3.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a combustor flue system, electrostatic precipitator and stack showing the principles in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 2A is a view of a module, and FIG. 2B is a detailed view of tubes which comprise the module.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a second preferred parallel passage catalyst configuration for use in accordance with the present invention. FIG. 3A is a view of a module, and FIG. 3B is a detailed view of the rectangularly-shaped honeycomb which comprises the module.
In a typical combustor which burns coal, essentially the entire sulfur content of the coal, which may vary from less than 1% to over 6% of the coal, is oxidized to sulfur dioxide during combustion. Usually 1.0% or less of the sulfur dioxide is further oxidized to sulfur trioxide. The sulfur trioxide combines with the entrained moisture to form sulfuric acid which, in turn, adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles as the flue gases cool. The sulfuric acid which adsorbs or condenses on the fly ash particles determines the electrical resistivity of the particles and thus the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation in the precipitator. Most precipitators are designed to receive flue gases at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F. However, when the sulfur content of the coal being used is too low, there is insufficient sulfur trioxide in the combustion gases to reduce the electrical resistivity of the particles. Therefore sulfur trioxide may be injected into the flue stream from an external system.
The present invention is particularly useful for the conditioning of combustion gas produced by the combustion of low-to-medium-sulfur-content coal. Referring to FIG. 1, the fuel is burned within the combustor 10 and the combustion gases are directed into the flue system. At a point in the flue system upstream of the electrostatic precipitator 12 a portion of the flue gases is withdrawn through conduit 14. Preferably about 1-5% of the total volume of gases entering the flue is withdrawn through the conduit 14 at a point at which the flue gases are in temperature range of approximately about 750°-900° F. The major portion of the flue gas continues through the flue system where it is passed through air heater 16 and then into the electrostatic precipitator 12 at the optimum temperature for precipitation of fly ash of about 250°-400° F. The gases then exit the stack 18. The path of the minor amount of withdrawn flue gases directed through conduit 14 is passed through a series of parallel airflow passages 20 which are lined with a catalytic material for converting SO2 to SO3. Such catalysts can contain vanadium pentoxide with an alkali modifier such as K2 O, or the lining can contain other conventional catalysts used for the conversion of SO2 to SO3 in the presence of combustion gases and moisture. The parallel flow-through passages 20 are of the hollow-tube or honeycomb type, preferably as described earlier and illustrated in FIGS. 2 and 3, and allow for passage therethrough of gases and particulates without fouling of the catalytic material which lines or is incorporated in the walls of the passages. The withdrawn combustion gases and the SO3 produced by catalytic conversion at passages 20 are then reintroduced into the main flue stream at injectors 22. The SO3 produced at the passages 20, when admixed with the main flue gases, is sufficient to raise the level of SO3 within the flue to thereby enhance the efficiency of electrostatic precipitation of fly ash in the precipitator 12. Normally and conveniently, the mixture of gases just prior to being introduced into the precipitator 12 are at a temperature in the range of about 250°-400° F.
Referring to FIG. 2, there is shown a perspective view of a preferred configuration of the parallel passage catalysts which may comprise passages 20 in FIG. 1. The catalyst configuration may be in the form of a module 30 into which are stacked a series of hollow parallel tubes 32 having the catalytic material on the inner surfaces thereof. As shown, the module 30 is not completely filled with tubes 32, however, the module 30 will in actual use be tightly packed with tubes 32. Referring to FIG. 2B, there is shown a closeup view of a portion of the module 30. The tubes 32 as shown need not be circular in cross-section but may assume other shapes, such as octagonal, hexagonal, etc. Most particularly preferred are the dimensions of tubes 32 such that the minimum diameter X (or other minimum dimension of opposing surfaces containing catalytic material) should be greater than about 0.25 inches.
Referring to FIG. 3 there is shown a second preferred embodiment of the passages 20 of FIG. 1 comprising a module 40 wherein each of the passages is defined by walls 42 in a honeycomb structure whereby the walls form the passages. In a particular preferred embodiment the minimum dimension Y between opposing surfaces containing catalytic material should be at least about 0.25 inches. As shown in FIG. 3B, the catalytic material will line both sides of each of the walls 42.
The present invention is particularly useful for enhancing SO3 content in combustion gases which contain less than 0.1% sulfur oxide and less than 5 ppm sulfur trioxide. Suitable means for injecting of the sulfur trioxide containing gas into the flue gas streams at 22 are known in the art.
It will be understood that various control features may be utilized in connection with the invention which are readily adaptable by those of ordinary skill in the art to the features in the apparatus disclosed herein. For example, conduit 14 may be equipped with a suitable control means programmed to respond to the SO2 and/or SO3 content of the combustion gases to regulate the volume of gases which are withdrawn for treatment with the catalyst. Alternatively, the control means may respond to the flow rate of flue gas in the flue, the level of combustor operation or the efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator as determined by the opacity of the flue gas exiting the precipitator.
The description hereinabove presents the preferred embodiment in accordance with the principle of the present invention; however, it is understood that various modifications may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
The present invention is not intended to be limited, except by the scope of the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3581463 *||Oct 26, 1967||Jun 1, 1971||Cottrell Res Inc||Electrostatic gas cleaning|
|US3689213 *||Feb 19, 1970||Sep 5, 1972||Guerrieri Salvatore A||Process for treating flue gases|
|US3993429 *||May 7, 1975||Nov 23, 1976||Wahlco, Inc.||Gas conditioning means|
|US4770674 *||Aug 6, 1984||Sep 13, 1988||Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation||Gas conditioning for an electrostatic precipitator|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5196038 *||Jul 24, 1992||Mar 23, 1993||Wright Robert A||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5240470 *||Jul 1, 1992||Aug 31, 1993||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||In-duct flue gas conditioning system|
|US5261931 *||Sep 14, 1992||Nov 16, 1993||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5288303 *||Apr 7, 1992||Feb 22, 1994||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5288309 *||May 14, 1992||Feb 22, 1994||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning agent demand control apparatus|
|US5350441 *||Mar 22, 1993||Sep 27, 1994||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5356597 *||Jul 30, 1992||Oct 18, 1994||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||In-duct flue gas conditioning system|
|US5370720 *||Jul 23, 1993||Dec 6, 1994||Welhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5449390 *||Mar 8, 1994||Sep 12, 1995||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system using vaporized sulfuric acid|
|US5538539 *||Jan 20, 1995||Jul 23, 1996||Wahlco, Inc.||Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning|
|US5540755 *||Sep 12, 1995||Jul 30, 1996||Wahlco, Inc||Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning|
|US5547495 *||May 13, 1994||Aug 20, 1996||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|US5587138 *||Apr 13, 1995||Dec 24, 1996||Austrian Energy & Environment, Sgp/Waagner-Biro Gmbh||Process for preventing the formation of harmful organic substances and steam generator for carrying out the process|
|US5665142 *||Nov 19, 1996||Sep 9, 1997||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system and method using native SO2 feedstock|
|US5678493 *||Aug 7, 1995||Oct 21, 1997||Wilson Eugene Kelley||Boiler flue gas conditioning system|
|US5862873 *||Mar 15, 1996||Jan 26, 1999||Camco Drilling Group Limited||Elements faced with superhard material|
|US5980610 *||Sep 25, 1997||Nov 9, 1999||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||Apparatus and method for improving electrostatic precipitator performance by plasma reactor conversion of SO2 to SO3|
|US7078235||Dec 4, 2002||Jul 18, 2006||Electric Power Research Institute||Sulfur trioxide conditioning system control algorithm|
|US7740827||Sep 25, 2006||Jun 22, 2010||Mecs, Inc.||Ruthenium oxide catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide|
|US8449653 *||Jun 27, 2011||May 28, 2013||Henry Krigmont||System and method for flue gas conditioning|
|US20030143501 *||Jan 16, 2003||Jul 31, 2003||Ferrigan James J.||Method and apparatus for sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning|
|US20030182020 *||Dec 4, 2002||Sep 25, 2003||Electric Power Research Institute||Sulfur trioxide conditioning system control algorithm|
|US20050178303 *||Mar 10, 2004||Aug 18, 2005||Higgins Brian S.||Method for in-furnace reduction and control of sulfur trioxide|
|US20080036275 *||Nov 10, 2006||Feb 14, 2008||Hall David R||Retainer Sleeve in a Degradation Assembly|
|US20080226540 *||Sep 25, 2006||Sep 18, 2008||Mecs, Inc.||Ruthenium Oxide Catalysts for Conversion of Sulfur Dioxide to Sulfur Trioxide|
|US20120058035 *||Jun 27, 2011||Mar 8, 2012||Krigmont Henry V||System and Method for Flue Gas Conditioning|
|DE4410213C1 *||Mar 24, 1994||Aug 31, 1995||Abb Management Ag||Verfahren zur Konditionierung von Abgasen|
|DE19611332A1 *||Mar 22, 1996||Sep 25, 1997||Abb Research Ltd||Process for conditioning waste gas|
|EP0723804A1 *||Jan 18, 1996||Jul 31, 1996||Wahlco, Inc.||Catalytic sulfur trioxide flue gas conditioning|
|WO1993019852A1 *||Apr 5, 1993||Oct 14, 1993||Wilhelm Environmental Technologies, Inc.||Flue gas conditioning system|
|WO2007035949A3 *||Sep 25, 2006||Mar 13, 2008||Abraham Bino||Ruthenium oxide catalysts for conversion of sulfur dioxide to sulfur trioxide|
|U.S. Classification||95/58, 423/244.1|
|Dec 8, 1989||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC., A CORP. O
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:ALTMAN, RALPH A.;GOOCH, JOHN P.;DISMUKES, EDWARD B.;REEL/FRAME:005204/0153;SIGNING DATES FROM 19891121 TO 19891127
|May 31, 1994||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jun 9, 1998||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Sep 9, 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12