Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS5016711 A
Publication typeGrant
Application numberUS 07/316,119
Publication dateMay 21, 1991
Filing dateFeb 24, 1989
Priority dateFeb 24, 1989
Fee statusPaid
Publication number07316119, 316119, US 5016711 A, US 5016711A, US-A-5016711, US5016711 A, US5016711A
InventorsKenneth M. Cowan
Original AssigneeShell Oil Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Cement sealing
US 5016711 A
Abstract
Cement-to-casing sealing in a wellbore is improved through addition of surfactant to the cement.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(10)
What is claimed is:
1. A process for cementing a selected part of a well, determining a surfactant capable of reducing the volumetric shrinkage of an aqueous cement slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening, acertaining the amount of the surfactant necessary to accomplish the reduction in volumetric shrinkage, and injecting the slurry with the necessary amount of surfactant into the selected part of the well, the surfactant thereby functioning to improve the interfacial sealing between the cement and surfaces contacting the cement.
2. A process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, determining a surfactant capable of reducing the volumetric shrinkage of an aqueous cement slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening, ascertaining the amount of the surfactant necessary to accomplish the reduction in volumetric shrinkage, and injecting the slurry with the necessary amount of surfactant into the selected part of the well.
3. A process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, injecting an aqueous cement slurry into the selected part of the well, the slurry containing a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant to reduce the volumetric shrinkage of the slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening, the surfactant thereby functioning to improve the interfacial sealing between the cement and surfaces contacting the cement.
4. A process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, injecting an aqueous cement slurry into the selected part of the well, the slurry containing a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant to reduce the volumetric shrinkage of the slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening.
5. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the volumetric shrinkage is reduced from about 25% to about 65%.
6. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the volumetric shrinkage is reduced from about 30% to about 50%.
7. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the cement slurry is substantially hydrocarbon-free.
8. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the concentration of surfactant in the water phase of the slurry ranges from about 0.1 to about 5% by weight.
9. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the concentration of surfactant in the water phase of the slurry ranges from about 0.2 to about 3% by weight.
10. The process of any one of claims 1-4 wherein the concentration of surfactant in the water phase of the slurry ranges from about 1.17 to about 2.33% by weight.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention pertains to improvements in cementing compositions and processes for cementing wells. The improvements provide better bonding and sealing of cement to adjacent surfaces such as casing and geologic formations. The improved seal provides better containment of fluids produced from or injected into geologic formations. The improved seal is also beneficial in containing fluids Produced from or injected into the space between two casings where cement is used as a sealant at some point in the annulus between the casings.

2. Description of Prior Art

Subsequent to drilling a borehole of an oil or gas well, casing is run into the well and a cement slurry is placed in the annulus between the outside of the casing and the borehole wall. Typically, the cement slurry is p)aced in the annulus using a successive fluid displacement technique. In this technique, the cement is first pumped into the casing. Another fluid, often drilling fluid or water, is pumped behind the cement to displace it out the bottom of the casing and u into the annulus between the casing and borehole wall. The cement slurry is usually raised to a point above the uppermost section of the formations to be isolated and may be raised into the annulus between the casing string being cemented and a previously cemented casing.

Once placed, the purpose of the cement slurry is to harden in the annulus and provide an effective seal between the casing and the borehole. The hardened cement sheath prevents or inhibits communication of fluids between the various formations penetrated by the well. In addition to providing zonal isolation, the cement is in contact with the casing and provides mechanical support and resistance to axial movement through the shear bond developed between the interfaces of cement and pipe and cement and formation.

Bonding of the cement to the casing and borehole surfaces is critical to providing an effective seal in the annulus and for providing support for casings. Under most conditions, the bonding of cement to casing is achieved through contact of the cement: particles with the surface of the casing. The resulting region of contact provides a mechanical interface which impedes movement of the casing due to high frictional forces. A fluid seal between cement and casing is effected by close contact of the cement particles at the casing surfaces which results in a region of very low effective permeability that prevents fluid migration along the interface.

Bonding between the cement and borehole wall is also achieved through contact of the cement particles with the formation or drilling fluid filter cake commonly deposited at the borehole wall during the drilling of the borehole. Some chemical combinations may also occur between the cement and formation or filter cake which may further enhance bonding and sealing at this interface. However, for this to occur the filter cake or formation should be water wet.

The present invention provides improved contact of the cement particles in an aqueous slurry at the interfaces of casing and formation or filter cake on the borehole wall. The improved contact is retained after the cement hardens resulting in a better fluid tight seal at the interfaces of cement and casing and cement and borehole wall. Better mechanical bonding between the cement sheath and casing and cement sheath and borehole wall is also realized.

The prior art describes various cement dispersants and retarders which are surface active agents; however, such agents are unlike the surface active agents of the present invention and do not provide the surface tension reduction and reduce shrinkage like the agents employed in the present invention. Napthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensates, phenol sulfonate formaldehyde condensates, and lignosulfonates are commonly added to cement slurries to disperse the cement particles (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,569,395; 4,687,516; 4,461,856; 3,132,693). These types of surface active agents serve the functions of (1) disaggregating the cement particle clusters and (2) preventing reaggregation of the dispersed cement particles in the slurry. Such surface active agents as these described in the prior art do not reduce the surface tension of the aqueous slurry to a value which applicant has found to be desirable to improve the interfacial contact of the cement with adjacent surfaces.

Some surfactants of the type used in the present invention have been employed in the prior art for a different purpose than in the present invention, namely in the preparation of liquid fluid loss additives which may be added to the cement slurry (U.S. Pat. No. 4,687,516). In this patent, a dry polymer is slurried into a hydrocarbon carrier fluid. A surfactant is added to oil wet the dry polymer in the preparation. A second surfactant is added to water wet the polymer upon contact with water in the preparation of the cement slurry. While the type and concentration of surfactant in this prior art falls within the range of the present invention, the hydrocarbon carrier introduced prevents realization of improved sealing.

Other surfactants of the type used in the present invention also have been used in cement slurries for a different purpose than in the present invention, namely to prevent migration of gas through the matrix of the "unhardened", setting cement (U.S. Pat. No. 3,926,257). In this patent, cementing is effected by injecting a cement slurry containing a foaming agent which by cooperating with the gas of the formation produces a foam barrier which prevents any subsequent migration of gas through the cement slurry during the setting of the cement slurry.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Applicant has discovered that the interfacial sealing and bonding between a cement and casing or borehole can be improved by reducing the surface tension of the cement slurry. Reducing the volumetric shrinkage of the cement is also advantageous to developing a fluid-tight interfacial seal and may be accomplished with the same additive which reduces surface tension. Surfactants are added to the cement slurry to reduce the surface tension of the aqueous phase. The reduction in surface tension promotes greater interfacial contact of cement particles with the surfaces of casing and borehole. The surfactants of the invention promote spreading and adhesional contact of the cement particles along the surfaces of the casing and borehole. The result is greater contact area of the cement particle surface with the surfaces of casing and borehole. Greater contact area promotes a fluid-tight seal and better mechanical shear bond between casing, cement and borehole.

Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, determining a surfactant capable of reducing the surface tension of the aqueous phase of an aqueous cement slurry to less than about 50 dynes/square centimeter, ascertaining the amount of the surfactant necessary to accomplish the reduction in surface tension, and injecting the slurry with the necessary amount of the surfactant into the selected area of the well. Alternatively, the present invention provides a process for cementing a casing in a borehole of a well, comprising, injecting an aqueous cement slurry into the well between the casing and the borehole, the slurry containing a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant to reduce the surface tension of the aqueous phase of the slurry to less than about 50 dynes/square centimeter.

In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, determining a surfactant capable of reducing the volumetric shrinkage of an aqueous cement slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening, ascertaining the amount of the surfactant necessary to accomplish the reduction in volumetric shrinkage, and injecting the slurry with the necessary amount of surfactant into the selected part of the well. Alternatively, the present invention provides a process for cementing a selected part of a well, comprising, injecting an aqueous cement slurry into the selected part of the well, the slurry containing a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant to reduce the volumetric shrinkable of the slurry up to about 75% during setting and hardening.

In addition, the present invention covers a cement composition for the preparation of an aqueous slurry useful in cementing a selected part of a well, the cement composition resulting in improved interfacial sealing and bonding between the cement and surfaces contacting the cement, comprising cement and a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant capable of reducing the surface tension of the aqueous phase of the slurry to less than about 50 dynes/square centimeter. Alternatively, the present invention covers a cement composition for the preparation of an aqueous slurry useful in cementing a selected part of a well, the cement composition resulting in improved interfacial sealing and bonding between the cement and surfaces contacting the cement, comprising cement and a sufficient amount of a selected surfactant capable of reducing volumetric shrinkage of the slurry from about 10% to about 75% during setting and hardening.

Broadly, the composition of the present invention includes a cement, and water plus surfactant which may be selected from the following non-limiting list of surfactant classes: alkanol amides, ethoxylated alkyl aryl sulfonates or sulfates, amine oxides, betaines and betaine derivatives, ethoxylated alcohols, sulfates or sulfonates of ethoxylated alcohols, ethoxylated alkyl phenols, sulfates or sulfonates of ethoxylated alkyl phenols, water soluble fluorocarbon-based surfactants, phosphate derivatives of ethoxylated alcohols, quaternary ammonium chloride, sulfates or sulfonates of alcohols, and condensation products of ethylene oxide and propylene glycol.

The cement of the present invention is injected into a selected "part" of the well. This "part" may be between casings, between a casing and a borehole, between a casing and a filter cake deposited on a borehole, etc. The cementing may be a "primary" cementing application or the repairing of a previous cementing application, e.g., "remedial" or "squeeze" cementing which can be conducted through perforations in the casing and fractures in the old cement, etc.

Other purposes, distinctions over the art, advantages and features of the invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The well cementing compositions of the invention include water, a hydraulic cement, and an additive for enhancing the interfacial sealing and bonding of the cement to casing and borehole. The term "hydraulic cement" is meant to encompass any inorganic cement which hardens or sets under water. Hydraulic cements, for example, include Portland cement, aluminous and pozzolan cement, blast furnace slag cement, and the like. The term is also intended to include cements having extenders such as bentonite, silicates, perlite, pozzolan or glass microspheres, gilsonite, ground coal or silica fume. The term also includes cements used either without any appreciable sand or aggregate material or such cements mixed with granular filling material, such as sand, ground limestone, crushed firebrick and the like. Mixtures of Portland cement and lightweight cement (also referred to as talc cement) are effective within the scope of the invention.

While various hydraulic cements can be utilized in forming the slurries, Portland cements of the various types identified as API Class A through H and J cements are commonly utilized. These cements are identified and defined in "API Specification for Materials and Testing for Well Cements", API SPEC 10, Third Edition, July 1, 1986, of the American Petroleum Institute.

Various additives conventionally added to cement compositions useful in cementing casings in a borehole of a well can also be added to the novel cement compositions herein in the amounts normally used. These additives can include, for example, cement accelerators such as calcium chloride, sodium chloride, gypsum, sodium silicate and seawater; lightweight additives such as bentonite, diatomaceous earth, gilsonite, coal, perlite, and pozzolan; heavy weight additives such as hematite, ilmenite, barite, silica flour, silica sand; cement retarders such as lignins, gluconic acid, sodium borate, boric acid, citric acid, lignosulfonates; filtration control additives such as polyvinyl acetate, vinyl sulfonate/vinyl amide polymers, cellulose derivatives, styrenebutadiene latex; dispersants such as napthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensates, poly phenol sulfonate condensates or acrylates. In addition, other unconventional additives such as xanthan gum can also be used.

A defoamer may be used with the invention. The defoamer is commonly employed in an amount from about 0.1 to 0.3% by weight of the cement and can be selected from any of the commercially available defoamers commonly used in cement slurries. Defoamers that are satisfactorily used in slurries include Foammaster A and PD-1 by Diamond Shamrock Corp. and Nalco 3801 by Nalco Chemicals, Inc.

Where the cement is placed in an interval where the static temperature exceeds 230 F., it can also be desirable to include from about 20 to 50% silica sand or silica flour by weight of the cement, in the slurries of the invention to prevent strength retrogression. At static temperatures over about 230 F. the strength of the cement will decrease over a period of time unless crystalline silica is added.

The mixing water for the slurry can be fresh water, brackish water, brine, seawater, or other water-containing fluids. Mixing water is utilized with the dry cement composition to produce a fluid pumpable slurry. The amount of water used can vary over a wide range depending upon the consistency o( the slurry, the density of the slurry required, the strength requirement for the particular job, and other factors.

The present cement compositions, in addition to hydraulic cement and water in a sufficient amount to produce a pumpable slurry also include an agent or agents or improve interfacial sealing and bonding and reduce shrinkage.

The agents of the invention which improve interfacial sealing and reduce shrinkage are surfactants which reduce the surface tension of the aqueous phase of the cement slurry. The surfactants of the invention may be anionic, amphoteric, cationic, nonionic or blends thereof, e.g., nonionics with anionic or cationic surfactants.

The following surfactants, classes of surfactants, and mixtures of surfactants are particularly useful in the present invention:

1. Alkanol amides (nonionic): ##STR1## where R=a carbon chain (alkyl group) of 8-20 carbons (usually 10-18); H1 and/or H2 may be replaced by an alkanol such as ethanol or isopropanol. One or both of the H's may be replaced.

Examples: lauric monoisopropanol amide, lauric diethanol amide, coconut diethanol amide. ALKAMIDE 2106 by Alkaril Chemicals, Ltd. is a coconut diethanol amide suitable for this application.

2. Ethoxylated alkyl aryl sulfonate:

Examples nonyl phenol sulfonate with 8 moles ethylene oxide, and N-decyl benzene sulfonate with 6 moles ethylene oxide.

3. Amine oxides (nonionic): ##STR2## where R=alkyl carbon chains from 1 to 20 carbons, usually one chain is 10 to 18 carbons. Alkyl groups can have hydroxyl or amido functional groups in their chain.

Examples: bis(2-hydroxyethyl) coco amine oxide, bis(2-hydroxyethyl) laurel amine oxide, laurel dimethyl amine oxide, coco amidopropyl dimethyl amine oxide, cetyl dimethyl amine oxide, myristyl dimethyl amine oxide.

4. Betaines and Betaine Derivatives (amphoteric): ##STR3## where R2 =alkyl chain length between 3 and 20 carbons, R2 =alkyl chain length between 1 and 4 carbons. Amide functional groups may be incorporated into the R1 alkyl chain.

Examples: coco amido propyl betaine (R2 =propyl group 3 carbons), laurel betaine (R1 =laurel group of 12 carbons, no R2), coco betaine (R1 =coco group of 12-14 carbons, no R2), oleyl betaine (R1 =oleyl group of 18 carbons, no R2), myristic betaine (R1 =myristyl group of 14 carbons, no R2), oleamido propyl betaine, isostearamido propyl betaine, laurel sulfobetaine.

5. Ethoxylated Alcohols (nonionic):

Ethoxylated simple alcohols with linear or branched chains having between 8 and 20 carbons with 3 to 20 moles of ethylene oxide groups; 6-14 moles of ethylene oxide are typical.

Examples C9 -C11 : linear alcohol with 8 moles ethylene oxide, C14 -C15 linear alcohol with 13 moles ethylene oxide, C12 -C15 linear alcohol with 9 moles ethylene oxIde.

6. Sulfates and Sufonates of Ethoxylated Alcohols (anionic):

The same ranges apply as in No. 5 supra except ethylene oxide moles may vary between 2 and 14.

Examples: C12 -C13 linear alcohol sulfate or sulfonate with 3 moles ethylene oxIde, C12 -C15 linear alcohol sulfate or sulfonate with 3 moles ethylene oxide.

7. Ethoxylated Alkyl Phenols (nonionic):

Alkyl chains of 8 to 20 carbons, usually between 4 and 14 carbons and more preferred to be 8 or 9 carbons, with 4-20 moles of ethylene oxide, usually between 7 and 20 moles and more preferred to be 8-12 moles.

Examples: Nonylphenol with 9 moles ethylene oxide, octylphenol with 8 moles ethylene oxide.

8. Sulfates or Sulfonates of Ethoxylated Alkyl Phenols (and their salts) (anionic):

Examples: Nonyl phenol sulfate or sulfonate with 9 moles ethylene oxide; octyl phenol sulfate or sulfonate with 8 moles ethylene oxide.

9. Fluorocarbon-based Surfactants (nonionic, amphoteric, anionic):

These must be water soluble forms. Fluorocarbon esters such as 3M Company's FC-740 are oil soluble and not appropriate for this use. 3M Company's FC-100, FC-129, and FC-170C are commercially available examples of fluorocarbon-based surfactants used in the invention.

Examples: Fluoro-octyl sulfonate or sulfate, perfluorated quaternary ammonium oxide, and fluorinated C9 -C11 alcohols with 7 moles ethylene oxide.

10. Phosphate Derivatives of Ethoxylated Alcohols:

Examples: C14 -C16 linear alcohol phosphate with 8 moles ethylene oxide; phosphated nonylphenol with 10 moles ethylene oxide.

11. Quaternary Ammonium Chloride (cationic):

Dimethyl dicoco ammonium chloride, cetyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, cetyl dimethyl ammonium chloride.

12. Sulfates or Sulfonates of Alcohols (and their salts)(anionic):

Sulfated simple alcohols with carbon chains of 8-20, usually between 10 and 16 and most common, 10-12.

7 Examples Sodium lauryl sulfate or sulfonate, potassium lauryl sulfate or sulfonate, magnesium lauryl sulfate or sulfonate, sodium n-decyl sulfate or sulfonate, triethanol amine laurel sulfate or sulfonate, sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate or sulfonate.

13. Condensation Products of Ethylene Oxide and Propylene Glycol (nonioic):

Examples: Propoxylated C9 -C11 alcohols with 6 moles ethylene oxide.

The surfactants or mixtures of surfactants should be soluble in the cement slurry and not precipitate or otherwise degrade under the action of the ions in the cement slurry (e.g., resistant to calcium and other electrolytes) and the temperature and pressure conditions occurring during the placement and curing of the cement.

Very good results have been obtained using nonylphenol ethoxylates, coco amido betaine, blends of N-alkyl coco trimethyl ammonium chloride and bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxide, blends of ethoxylated trimethylnonanol and perfluoro quaternary ammonium oxide, C12 -C15 linear alcohol ethoxylate sulfate, C9 -C11 linear alcohol ethoxylate sulfates, sodium lauryl sulfate and ethoxy alcohol sulfates.

The concentration of surfactant in the water phase used to prepare the slurry will preferably generally be from about 0.1 to about 5% by weight, and more preferably from about 0.2 to about 3% by weight; excellent results have been obtained with concentrations between about 1.17 and about 2.33% by weight.

The surface tension reduction commonly observed at these concentrations of the surfactant classes previously described is typically less than about 50 dynes/square centimeter and frequently less than about 40 dynes/square centimeter. Usually the surface tension is between about 22 and about 36 dynes/square centimeter. The surface tension provided by commonly used surface active agents described in the prior art is considerably higher than the surface tension of the invention. Table 1 contains a comparison of the surface tension provided by prior art with the present invention.

The improved interfacial sealing and bonding provided by the invention is demonstrated by the data in Tables 2 and 3.

Another primary benefit of the surfactants used is less volumetric shrinkage of the cement slurry during the setting and hardening process. Shrinkage of the cement occurs due to the hydration of the cement particles. The chemical species formed from hydration of the cement occupy less volume than the original cement particles. This chemical shrinkage occurs as the cement is in a highly plastic state and as the cement develops true compressive strength. Shrinkage occuring after the cement has sufficient structural strength to hold a shape can allow the formation of a microchannel at the interface of the casing and cement or casing and borehole. Normal shrinkage for neat cement during setting and hardening is about 5-8% by volume and usually 6-7%. As bulk additives are added (e.g. silica flour) to the cement, less shrinkage occurs per unit volume since there is less cement per unit volume. The present invention can reduce volumetric shrinkage of the slurry by about 10% to about 75%, more usually about 25% to about 65% and most usually about 30% to about 50%. Table 4 contains shrinkage data.

Slurries in accordance with the invention can be formed through the use of conventional techniques and apparatus normally employed in well cementing operations. The surfactant may be added to the bulk cement slurry prepared in a holding tank on the surface according to a procedure commonly referred to as batch mixing. However, the surfactant may be injected continuously into the slurry as it is prepared and pumped into the well by the use of an injection pump. If the surfactant is a solid, it may be solubilized before being injected. Both operations have been successfully performed in field applications without problems.

The invention has been successfully employed in a variety of field applications. The invention has been particularly effective in sealing the annulus between casings in wells drilled with oil muds. Liner overlaps are common examples where cement is raised into the annulus between casings.

              TABLE 1______________________________________Surface Tension of Solutions ContainingSurface Active Agents in Distilled Water at 25 C.                  Con-     Surface                  centra-  Tension                  tion by  dynes/Additive               % weight sq.cm.______________________________________PRIOR ARTNaphthalene Sulfonate  0.5      73.2Formaldehyde Condensate(Sodium salt)Naphthalene Sulfonate  1.0      71.7Formaldehyde Condensate(Sodium salt)Phenol Sulfonate       0.5      71.7Formaldehyde CondensatePhenol Sulfonate       1.0      70.2Formaldehyde CondensateBlend of Calcium and   0.1      71.0Sodium LignosulfonatesBlend of Calcium and   0.25     68.3Sodium LignosulfonatesBlend of Calcium and   0.5      60.9Sodium LignosulfonatesPRESENT INVENTIONCoco Amido Betaine     0.2      33.4Coco Amido Betaine     1.0      33.1Blend of 75% by volume N-alkyl coco                  0.2      28.5trimethyl ammonium chloride and 25% byvolume bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxideBlend of 75% by volume N-alkyl coco                  1.0      28.8trimethyl ammonium chloride and 25% byvolume bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxideBlend of 25% by volume of fluoroalkyl                  0.004    39sulfonate (sodium salt) and 25% by volumediethylene glycol monobutyl ether and50% by volume waterBlend of 25% by volume fluoroalkyl                  0.04     17sulfonate (sodium salt) 25% by volumediethylene glycol monobutyl etherand 50% by volume waterBlend of 51% by volume potassium                  0.02     23fluoroalkyl carboxylates in 4% by volumeethanol, 14% by volume 2-butoxyethanoland 31% by volume waterBlend of 51% by volume potassium                  0.2      17fluoroalkyl carboxylates in 4% by volumeethanol, l4% by volume 2-butoxyethanoland 31% by volume water95% by volume fluorinated alkyl                  0.001    22polyoxyethylene ethanols, 5% byvolume water95% by volume fluorinated alkyl                  0.01     20polyoxyethylene ethanols and 5% byvolume waterSodium lauryl sulfate  0.2      2528% by volume active sodium alkyl aryl                  0.1      30polyether sulfonate, 72% by volume water80% by volume ethoxylated nonylphenol                  0.1      32(10 moles ethylene oxide), 15% by volumewater plus 5% by volume methanol______________________________________

              TABLE 2______________________________________Interfacial Sealing Comparison:Nitrogen Leak Rate at Cement-Pipe InterfaceMeasured after 24 hrs. @ 100 F.,Class H Portland Cement Density: 16.4 lb/gal               Maximum               Differential                         NitrogenAdditives and       Pressure  LeakConcentration       Held (psi)                         Rate*______________________________________Cement slurry, no additives                300      2.77  10-3PRESENT INVENTIONEthoxylated nonylphenol with 10                800      No Leakmoles ethylene oxide1.17% by wt. of mix waterEthoxylated nonylphenol with 10               1000      No Leakmoles ethylene oxide0.23% by wt. of mix waterBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl coco               1000      2.39  10-5trimethyl ammonium chloride and25% by vol. bis(2-hydroxyethyl)cocoamine oxide, 2.33% by wt. ofmix waterBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl coco                600      9.43  10-5trimethyl ammonium chloride and25% by vol. bis(2-hydroxyethyl)cocoamine oxide, 1.17% by wt. ofmix waterBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl coco               800       No Leaktrimethyl ammonium chloride and25% by vol. bis(2-hydroxyethyl)cocoamine oxide, 0.23% by wt. ofmix waterCoco amido betaine  1000      No Leak2.33% by wt. of mix waterCoco amido betaine  1000      No Leak1.17% by.wt. of mix water______________________________________ *Nitrogen Leak Rate at interface is in units of cc's/psiminute. Leak test time: 30 to 60 minutes at indicated differential pressure.

              TABLE 3______________________________________Interfacial Sealing ComparisonNitrogen Leak Rate at Cement/Pipe lnterfaceMeasured after 24 hrs. @ 200 F.,Class H Portland Cement density: 16.4 lb/gal               Maximum               Differential                         NitrogenAdditives and       Pressure  LeakConcentration       Held (psi)                         Rate*______________________________________PRlOR ARTNaphthalene Sulfonate               300       2.77  10-3Formaldehyde Condensate0.25% by wt. of cementplus calcium/sodiumLignosulfonate0.15% by wt. of cementPRESENT INVENTlONCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate1               1500      No Leak0.2% by wt. of cement plus2.33% coco betaine by wt. ofmix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate1               1500      No Leak0.2% by wt. of cement plusBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl cocotrimethyl ammonium chloride and25% by vol. bis(2-hydroxyethyl)cocoamine oxide 2.33% by wt. ofmix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate1               1000      2.21  10-50.25% by wt. of cement plus ethoxyalcohol sulfonate1.17% by weight of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate1                800      2.26  10-50.30% by wt. of cement plusethoxylated nonylphenol with 10moles ethylene oxide2.33% by wt. of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate1               1500      No Leak0.30% by wt. of cement plusEthoxylated nonylphenol with 10moles ethylene oxide1.17% by weight of mix water______________________________________ *Nitrogen Leak Rate at interface is in units of cc's/psiminute. Leak test time: 30 to 60 minutes at indicated differential pressure. 1 The calcium/sodium lignosulfonate is present in the composition to retard the cement so that it will remain fluid long enough to be placed i the annulus at elevated temperatures.

              TABLE 4______________________________________Cement Shrinkage after 24 hrs. @ 100 F.Shrinkage Measured While Curing Under 2000 psi PressureCement Density: 16.4 lb/gal (API Class H Cement)                   ShrinkageAdditives and Concentration                   % by volume______________________________________Cement slurry, no additives                   6.8PRESENT INVENTIONEthoxylated nonylphenol with                   2.610 moles ethylene oxide0.23% by wt. of mix waterBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl coco trimethyl                   3.4ammonium chloride and 25% by volbis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxide1.17% by wt. of mix waterBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl coco trimethyl                   2.6ammonium chloride and 25% by vol.bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxide0.23% by wt. of mix waterCoco amido betaine      2.52.33% by wt. of mix waterCoco amido betaine      2.61.17% by wt. of mix water______________________________________

              TABLE 5______________________________________Cement Shrinkage after 24 hrs. @ 200 F.Shrinkage Measured While Curing Under 2000 psi PressureCement Density: 16.4 lb/gal (API Class H Cement)                   ShrinkageAdditives and Concentration                   % by volume______________________________________PRIOR ARTNaphthalene Sulfonate   6.0Formaldehyde condensate10.25% by wt. of cement plusCalcium/Sodium lignosulfonate0.15% by wt. of cementPRESENT INVENTIONCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate2                   3.00.2% by wt. of cement plus2.33% coco betaine by wt. of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate2                   2.20.2% by wt. of cement plusBlend of 75% by vol. N-alkyl cocotrimethyl ammonium chloride and 25%by vol. bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamineoxide, 2.33% by wt. of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate2                   2.20.25% by wt. of cement plus ethoxy alcoholsulfonate, 1.17% by wt. of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate2                   3.10.30% by wt. of cement plus ethoxylatednonylphenol with 10 moles ethylene oxide2.33% by wt. of mix waterCalcium/Sodium Lignosulfonate2                   2.70.30% by wt. of cement plus ethoxylatednonylphenol with 10 moles ethylene oxide1.17% by wt. of mix water______________________________________ 1 A dispersant to minimize electrostatic attraction of cement particles. Serves to disaggregate cement particle clusters and prevent reaggregation within the slurry. 2 The calcium/sodium lignosulfonate is present in the composition to retard the cement so that it will remain fluid long enough to be placed i the annulus at elevated temperatures.

The cement formulations of the present invention described in Table 6 are illustrative examples to be prepared in accordance with the components and concentrations of components shown, and further demonstrate the scope and practice of the invention.

                                  TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________Cement Formulations                Concentration                        SurfactantAdditives            % by weight                        Type__________________________________________________________________________Class H Cement       36.96   Alkanol amideFlyash               29.1Fresh water          33.28Lauric monoisopropyl amide                0.66Class A Cement       68.49   Alkanol amideFresh water          30.44Coconut diethanol amide                1.21Class H Cement       70.69   Ethoxylated alkylSea water            28.37   aryl sulfonate orNonylphenol sulfonate or sulfate                0.93    sulfatewith 8 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       69.93   Ethoxylated alkylFresh water          28.85   aryl sulfonate orCarboxymethyl-hydroxy ethyl cellulose                0.52    sulfateN-decyl benzene sulfonate or sulfate                0.69with 6 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       48.25   Amine oxideSilica flour         16.89Salt                 9.16Hostamere 2825 polymer1                .97(vinyl sulfonate/vinyl amide)Lignosulfonate retarder                .001Fresh water          24.42bis(2-hydroxyethyl) cocoamine oxide                .21Class H Cement       68.35   Amine oxideFresh water          31.05Coco amidopropyl dimethyl                .06amine oxideClass H Cement       36.72   Betaine derivativeFlyash               28.91Hydroxyethyl cellulose                0.66Fresh water          33.06Coco betaine         0.65Class C Cement       65.21   Betaines and BetaineFresh water          33.79   derivativeCoco amidopropyl betaine                1.0Class H Cement       74.16   Betaines and BetaineNaphthalene sulfonate        derivativeFormaldehyde CondensateDispersant           0.56Polyvinyl alcohol/vinyl acetate                0.003PolymerFresh water          24.83Lauryl sulfobetaine  0.16Class G Cement       69.11   Ethoxylated alcoholsNaphthalene sulfonateFormaldehyde condensateDispersant           0.35Lignosulfonate retarder                0.14Fresh water          29.52C9 -C11 linear alcohols with                0.898 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       33.46   Ethoxylated alcoholsFlyash               14.18Bentonite            2.86Calcium chloride     0.95Fresh water          48.08C14 -C15 linear alcohols with                0.4613 moles ethylene oxideClass G Cement       36.13   Sulfates or sulfonatesFlyash               28.44   of ethoxylated alcoholsSalt                 3.22Fresh water          31.73C14 -C15 linear alcohols sulfate or                0.48sulfonate with 7 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       36.01   Sulfates or sulfonatesFlyash               28.35   of ethoxylated alcoholsSalt                 3.21Hydroxyethyl cellulose                0.32Fresh water          31.4C12 -C13 linear alcohol sulfate or                0.7sulfonate with 3 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       54.5    Ethoxylated alkylSilica flour         19.1    phenolsPotassium chloride   1.2Carboxymethyl hydroxy-ethyl cellulose                0.44Phenol sulfonate condensed with                0.27formaldehyde dispersantLignosulfonate retarder                0.30Defoamer             0.14Fresh water          23.57Nonylphenol with 10 moles ethylene oxide                0.48Class H Cement       40.58   Ethoxylated alkylSodium silicate      1.0     phenolsSea water            56.25Octylphenol with 8 moles ethylene oxide                2.15Class H Cement       45.5    Sulfate or suIfonateSand - 100 mesh      15.92   of ethoxylated alkylHematite             16.94   phenolsCarboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose                0.34Phenol sulfonate condensed with                0.23formaldehyde dispersantLignosulfonate retarder                0.23Sodium borate hydrate                0.23Fresh water          20.24Nonyl phenol sulfate or sulfonate                0.4with 10 moles ethylene oxideClass G Cement       36.41   Sulfates or sulfonatesFlyash               28.66   of ethoxylated alkylHydroxyethyl cellulose                0.65    phenolsSea water            33.35Octyl phenol sulfate or sulfonate                0.92with 8 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       70.55   Fluorocarbon-basedHostamere 2825 polymer1                1.06    surfactants(vinyl sulfonate/vinyl amide)Lignosulfonate retarder                0.18Sea water            27.56Perfluorated quaternary ammonium oxide                0.66Class H Cement       63.26   Fluorocarbon-basedSilica fume          6.73    surfactantsHydroxyethyl cellulose                .47Lignosulfonate retarder                .00Fresh water          28.98Fluorinated C9 -C11 alcohols                0.56with 7 moles ethylene oxideClass A Cement       68.35   PhosphateFresh water          31.25   derivatives ofC14 -C16 linear alcohol phosphate                0.4     ethoxylated alcoholswith 8 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       49.09   PhosphateBentonite            3.93    derivatives ofFresh water          46.76   ethoxylated alcoholsNonyl phenol phosphate                0.22with 10 moles ethylene oxideClass H Cement       69.93   Quaternary ammoniumHydroxyethyl cellulose                0.42    chlorideAluminum powder      0.28Fresh water          29.06Dimethyl dicoco ammonium chloride                0.31Class C Cement       60.51   Quaternary ammoniumSalt                 6.03    chlorideFresh water          33.03Cetyl dimethyl ammonium chloride                0.31Class G Cement       52.52   Sulfates or sulfonatesSilica flour         21.01   of alcoholsPotassium chloride   1.29Fresh water          24.67Sodium lauryl sulfate or sulfonate                0.51Class A Cement       33.78   Sulfates or sulfonatesFlyash               14.32   of alcoholsBentonite            2.89Fresh water          48.55Sodium 2-ethylhexyl sulfate or sulfonate                0.46Class H Cement       34.84   CondensationFlyash               27.42   products of ethyleneSalt                 5.76    oxide and propyleneFresh water          31.55   glycolPropoxylated C9 -C14 alcohols                0.43with 6 moles ethylene oxide__________________________________________________________________________ 1 Manufactured by Hoechst Celanese Corp.

______________________________________Cement Composition for Example 1Cement density: 17.1 lb/galAdditive      Concentration                     Function______________________________________Silica flour  35% bwoc1                     Prevent strength                     retrogressionPolyvinyl alcohol/         1.2% bwoc1                     Control fluid lossacetate polymer blendCarboxymethyl hydroxy-         0.1% bwoc1                     Retard/Control fluidethyl cellulose           lossCoco amido betaine         2.11% by wt.                     Improve bonding and         of mix      sealing and reduce         water       shrinkage______________________________________ 1 bwoc = by weight of cement (cement weighs 94 lbs/sk)
EXAMPLE 1

Liners cemented in a south Louisiana field often required squeeze cementing operations to effect a gas-tight seal which was not provided by the primary cementing operation. After the primary cementing operation, a drawdown was imposed in the wellbore across the liner top to determine if gas from formations would leak through the liner top into the well. Often these negative tests would show a poor seal in the liner at low drawdown pressures. Approximately 50 to 70 percent of the liner tops leaked and had to be squeezed.

A cocoamido betaine surfactant was incorporated into a cement formulation for the primary cementing operation for a liner. The concentration of the surfactant was 2.11% by weight in the aqueous phase. After the primary cementing operation, the cement was allowed to set and harden for an amount of time equal to about that of previous cementing operations. A 4000 psi drawdown was placed across the top of the liner to determine the seal quality. No leakage was measured after several hours at this drawdown pressure.

______________________________________Cement Formulation for Example 2Cement densi:y: 17.0 lb/galAdditive      Concentration                     Function______________________________________Magnesium oxide         4% bwoc1                     Expansive agentPolyvinyl alcohol/         0.4% bwoc1                     Fluid loss controlacetate polymer           agentPhenol sulfonate         0.5% bwoc1                     Dispersantcondensedwith formaldehydeCalcium/Sodium         0.05% bwoc1                     Retarderlignosulfonate blendCocoamido betaine         1.32% by wt. of                     Improve bonding andsurfactant    mix water   sealing and reduce                     shrinkage______________________________________ 1 bwoc = by weight of cement (cement weighs 94 lbs/sk)
EXAMPLE 2

A pilot CO2 injection well was to be cemented in an offshore location. A good seal between the cement and borehole and casing had not been achieved in previous wells of this type. The poor seal prevented accurate evaluation of the CO2 injection effectiveness due to loss of injectant to adjacent formations in the borehole.

Zonal isolation was critical to the evaluation but complicated by the close proximity of sands which had similar properties and reservoir pressures as the target sand. However, these adjacent sandstone formations were not to be injected with CO2. The adjacent sands were separated from the target sand by 1 foot thick shale layers.

A cocoamido betaine surfactant (1.32% by weight of the aqueous phase) was used in the cement formulation for the primary cementing operation. The results of acoustic logging evaluations indicated a good seal in the annulus. After perforating the target sand zone, logging programs to monitor fluid flow in the reservoir and adjacent sands indicated the cement had isolated the wellbore at the cement and casing and cement and wellbore interfaces.

______________________________________Cement Formulation for Example 3Cement density: 19.1 lb/galAdditive      Concentration                     Function______________________________________Silica Flour  35% bwoc1                     Prevent strength                     retrogressionHematite      50 lb. sack Weighting agentCarboxymethyl 0.5% bwoc1                     Control fluid losshydroxyethyl cellulose    and free waterAluminum Powder         0.6% bwoc1                     Expansive AgentLignosulfate retarder         0.7% bwoc1                     Retard cement setEthoxylated alcohol         0.93% by wt. of                     Improve bonding andsulfonate     mix water   sealing and reduce                     shrinkage______________________________________ 1 bwoc = by weight of cement (cement weighs 94 lbs/sk)
EXAMPLE 3

A scab tieback string of about 1000 feet in length was cemented on top of a leaking liner top in a deep sour gas well. Attempts had been made to squeeze the liner top to seal out the invading gas. The squeeze cementing operations failed to provide a seal and a short tieback string was to be cemented to seal out the gas. The well was drilled with a 19.1 lb/gal oil mud which left casing surfaces oil wet.

A 19.1 lb/gal cement formulation containing an ethoxylated alcohol sulfonate at a concentration of 0.93% by weight was used. After placement, a drawdown was placed across the top of the short tieback string. The drawdown pressure was 4100 psi and was held for 12 hours without any indication of gas invasion.

The foregoing description of the invention is merely intended to be explanatory thereof, and various changes in the details of the described processes and compositions may be made within the scope of the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2705050 *May 25, 1953Mar 29, 1955Stanolind Oil & Gas CoSettable drilling fluid
US2776713 *Sep 30, 1954Jan 8, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoCementing of wells
US2800963 *Dec 10, 1953Jul 30, 1957Halliburton Oil Well CementingMethod and composition for sealing earth formation
US2806531 *Dec 19, 1955Sep 17, 1957Exxon Research Engineering CoComposition for treating wells and method for using same
US2822873 *Nov 8, 1955Feb 11, 1958Shell DevCement composition
US2880096 *Dec 6, 1954Mar 31, 1959Phillips Petroleum CoCement compositions and process of cementing wells
US2890169 *Mar 26, 1956Jun 9, 1959Jersey Prod Res CoDrilling fluid for wells
US2961044 *Jun 17, 1957Nov 22, 1960Phillips Petroleum CoCement compositions and process of cementing wells
US3022824 *Sep 8, 1958Feb 27, 1962Jersey Prod Res CoMethod and composition for cementing wells
US3105047 *Aug 11, 1960Sep 24, 1963Jersey Prod Res CoHydraulic fracturing fluid
US3126958 *Mar 2, 1959Mar 31, 1964 Cementing casing
US3132693 *Dec 26, 1961May 12, 1964Frederick Weisend CharlesComposition comprising hydroxyethyl cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone and organic sulfonate, cement slurry prepared therefrom and method of cementing wells therewith
US3145774 *Jan 17, 1963Aug 25, 1964Socony Mobil Oil Co IncCement for wells
US3168139 *May 8, 1961Feb 2, 1965Great Lakes Carbon CorpConverting drilling muds to slurries suitable for cementing oil and gas wells
US3180748 *Nov 2, 1961Apr 27, 1965Pan American Petroleum CorpHigh-temperature well cement
US3232777 *Feb 4, 1963Feb 1, 1966Bush Edward G WCementitious composition and method of preparation
US3242986 *Mar 12, 1965Mar 29, 1966Halliburton CoMethod for sealing formations
US3306354 *Jun 5, 1964Feb 28, 1967Union Oil CoMethod for storing fluids in a subterranean formation
US3307588 *Oct 28, 1963Mar 7, 1967Inst Gas TechnologyMethod for sealing pipe and method for preparing composition useful therein
US3317327 *Jan 6, 1964May 2, 1967Onoda Cement Co LtdMethod of retarding the setting time of cement
US3368624 *Oct 1, 1965Feb 13, 1968Continental Oil CoControl of gas-oil ratio in producing wells
US3379260 *Sep 7, 1965Apr 23, 1968Union Oil CoMethod of storing hydrocarbon fluids using a foam barrier
US3393738 *Jan 30, 1967Jul 23, 1968Union Oil CoMethod for storing gas in subterranean formations
US3409093 *Apr 17, 1967Nov 5, 1968Halliburton CoMethod of drilling wells
US3499491 *Jun 28, 1968Mar 10, 1970Dresser IndMethod and composition for cementing oil well casing
US3557876 *Apr 10, 1969Jan 26, 1971Western Co Of North AmericaMethod and composition for drilling and cementing of wells
US3605898 *Jul 29, 1968Sep 20, 1971Dow Chemical CoMethod of drilling and cementing a well using an aqueous hydraulic cement slurry
US3615784 *Aug 4, 1969Oct 26, 1971John GodfreyCompositions for producing improved concrete
US3616858 *Apr 14, 1970Nov 2, 1971Pan American Petroleum CorpMethod for plugging gas zones with silicone foams
US3642506 *Nov 28, 1969Feb 15, 1972Swift & CoMethod for improving the properties of hydraulic cementitious mixtures
US3711405 *Nov 19, 1969Jan 16, 1973Union Oil CoLow fluid loss well treating composition and method
US3722591 *Apr 12, 1971Mar 27, 1973Continental Oil CoMethod for insulating and lining a borehole in permafrost
US3782983 *May 18, 1970Jan 1, 1974Gaf CorpAir entrainment compositions for cement mortars
US3818998 *Jun 27, 1972Jun 25, 1974Phillips Petroleum CoMethod of reducing lost circulation during well drilling
US3821985 *Apr 30, 1973Jul 2, 1974Halliburton CoWell cementing method using high temperature cementing compositions
US3884351 *Jun 17, 1974May 20, 1975James Joseph WDrawing case for architects and the like
US3887009 *Apr 25, 1974Jun 3, 1975Oil BaseDrilling mud-cement compositions for well cementing operations
US3921717 *Jan 23, 1975Nov 25, 1975Danjushevsky Solomon IsaakovicMethod for cementing wells
US3926257 *May 14, 1974Dec 16, 1975Gaz De FranceWell cementing processes
US3990903 *Apr 16, 1975Nov 9, 1976Southwest Research InstituteHydrothermal cement and method of cementing well bores
US4200153 *Dec 8, 1978Apr 29, 1980Union Oil Company Of CaliforniaMethod for cementing high temperature wells
US4252193 *Jun 11, 1979Feb 24, 1981Standard Oil Company (Indiana)Low density cement slurry and its use
US4258790 *Jan 24, 1979Mar 31, 1981The Western Company Of North AmericaWell cementing method using low fluid-loss cement slurry
US4299516 *Jan 25, 1980Nov 10, 1981Chiyoda Chemical Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.Method for improving the strength of a water-saturated soft soil
US4304298 *May 10, 1979Dec 8, 1981Halliburton CompanyWell completion, gas generation
US4328036 *Dec 19, 1980May 4, 1982The Dow Chemical CompanyHigh temperature expanding cement composition and use
US4391329 *May 14, 1981Jul 5, 1983Union Oil Company Of CaliforniaUse of marker fluid in cementing offshore wells
US4433731 *Mar 30, 1983Feb 28, 1984Halliburton CompanyCarboxymethylhydroxyethycellulose and naphthalenesulfonic acid formaldehyde condensate
US4461856 *Nov 3, 1983Jul 24, 1984The Dow Chemical CompanyAqueous hydraulic cement slurry
US4519452 *May 31, 1984May 28, 1985Exxon Production Research Co.Using heat deactivatable deflocculant
US4547223 *Mar 2, 1981Oct 15, 1985Nihon Cement Co., Ltd.Cement-shrinkage-reducing agent and cement composition
US4569395 *Apr 20, 1984Feb 11, 1986Hughes Tool CompanyMatrix control cementing slurry
US4584327 *May 24, 1985Apr 22, 1986Halliburton CompanyEnvironmentally compatable high density drilling mud, cement composition or blow-out fluid
US4674572 *Jan 9, 1986Jun 23, 1987Union Oil Company Of CaliforniaCorrosion and erosion-resistant wellhousing
US4676832 *Oct 26, 1984Jun 30, 1987Halliburton CompanyHydratable gel forming materials, methylene phosphonic acids
US4687516 *Dec 11, 1984Aug 18, 1987Halliburton CompanyLiquid fluid loss control additive for oil field cements
US4716965 *Apr 8, 1986Jan 5, 1988Shell Oil CompanySurrounding sheath of alternating layers of polyurethane and polyethylene foams; sealing
US4742094 *Sep 25, 1986May 3, 1988Halliburton CompanyLow fluid loss salt saturated cement slurries, additives and methods
US4767460 *Jan 17, 1986Aug 30, 1988Dowell Schlumberger IncorporatedCement compositions for cementing of wells enabling gas channelling in the cemented annulus to be inhibited by right-angle setting
CA747213A *Nov 29, 1966GrefcoConverting drilling muds to slurries suitable for cementing oil and gas wells
DE1003640B *Feb 27, 1954Feb 28, 1957Meynadier & Cie AgVerfahren zur Herstellung von Moertel und Beton
DE2050084A1 *Oct 13, 1970Apr 20, 1972 Plasticised mortar or concrete - cont fatty alcohol/alkyl oxide adducts
DE2443997A1 *Sep 14, 1974Apr 1, 1976Stadtwerke Emden GmbhMischung zum abdichten von verlegten rohrleitungen
FR1329415A * Title not available
GB787187A * Title not available
GB819229A * Title not available
JPS51525A * Title not available
JPS50150724A * Title not available
SU960420A1 * Title not available
SU1125226A1 * Title not available
SU1193268A1 * Title not available
SU1213177A1 * Title not available
SU1239270A1 * Title not available
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5099922 *Mar 26, 1991Mar 31, 1992The Western Company Of North AmericaControl of gas flow through cement column
US5232497 *Apr 30, 1992Aug 3, 1993The Western Company Of North AmericaWith quaternary ammonium alkyl substituted salts
US5252128 *Sep 4, 1992Oct 12, 1993Basf CorporationStyrene-butadiene latex with nonionic and anionic surfactants; low fluid loss and free water valves
US5269632 *Oct 22, 1992Dec 14, 1993Shell Oil CompanyMethod for strengthening the structural base of offshore structures
US5269975 *Sep 10, 1992Dec 14, 1993Noakes John ESolidification of organic waste materials in cement
US5275511 *Oct 22, 1992Jan 4, 1994Shell Oil CompanyMethod for installation of piles in offshore locations
US5277519 *Oct 22, 1992Jan 11, 1994Shell Oil CompanyWell drilling cuttings disposal
US5284513 *Oct 22, 1992Feb 8, 1994Shell Oil CoCement slurry and cement compositions
US5285679 *Oct 22, 1992Feb 15, 1994Shell Oil CompanyQuantification of blast furnace slag in a slurry
US5295543 *Apr 16, 1993Mar 22, 1994Halliburton CompanyConverting drilling fluids to cementitious compositions
US5298070 *Dec 18, 1992Mar 29, 1994Shell Oil CompanyCement fluid loss reduction
US5301752 *Oct 22, 1992Apr 12, 1994Shell Oil CompanyDrilling and cementing with phosphate-blast furnace slag
US5301754 *Oct 22, 1992Apr 12, 1994Shell Oil CompanyWellbore cementing with ionomer-blast furnace slag system
US5307877 *Oct 22, 1992May 3, 1994Shell Oil CompanyUsing a water soluble polymer
US5309997 *Oct 22, 1992May 10, 1994Shell Oil CompanyWell fluid for in-situ borehole repair
US5309999 *Oct 22, 1992May 10, 1994Shell Oil CompanyCement slurry composition and method to cement wellbore casings in salt formations
US5311944 *Oct 22, 1992May 17, 1994Shell Oil CompanyBlast furnace slag blend in cement
US5311945 *Oct 22, 1992May 17, 1994Shell Oil CompanyCombining water, calcium, magnesium, or zinc oxides, and phosphorus acid to produce cementitious slurry
US5314022 *Oct 22, 1992May 24, 1994Shell Oil CompanyDilution of drilling fluid in forming cement slurries
US5314031 *Oct 22, 1992May 24, 1994Shell Oil CompanyDirectional drilling plug
US5316083 *Dec 31, 1992May 31, 1994Shell Oil CompanyMethod for drilling a well
US5322124 *Oct 22, 1992Jun 21, 1994Shell Oil CompanyForcing slurry through casing slits; proton acceptor metal compound and polymer
US5325922 *Oct 22, 1992Jul 5, 1994Shell Oil CompanyRestoring lost circulation
US5327968 *Dec 30, 1992Jul 12, 1994Halliburton CompanyUtilizing drilling fluid in well cementing operations
US5332040 *Oct 22, 1992Jul 26, 1994Shell Oil CompanyProcess to cement a casing in a wellbore
US5332041 *Dec 30, 1992Jul 26, 1994Halliburton CompanyWater, silica fume, dispersant, magnesium oxide or calcium hydroxide activator, delay additive, well bores
US5333690 *Dec 31, 1992Aug 2, 1994Shell Oil CompanyCementing with blast furnace slag using spacer
US5343947 *Oct 22, 1992Sep 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyAnchor plug for open hole test tools
US5343950 *Oct 22, 1992Sep 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyDrilling and cementing extended reach boreholes
US5343951 *Oct 22, 1992Sep 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyDrilling and cementing slim hole wells
US5343952 *Oct 22, 1992Sep 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyCement plug for well abandonment
US5348584 *Nov 23, 1993Sep 20, 1994Halliburton CompanyFine particle size hydraulic cement with deposited alkali/ne earth/ alkylbenzenesulfonate surfactant; forming slurry by mixing low viscosity hydrocarbon liquid with the cement; use to terminate water flow in subterranean formations
US5351759 *Oct 22, 1992Oct 4, 1994Shell Oil CompanySlag-cement displacement by direct fluid contact
US5355954 *Nov 2, 1993Oct 18, 1994Halliburton CompanyUtilizing drilling fluid in well cementing operations
US5358049 *Feb 14, 1994Oct 25, 1994Shell Oil CompanyConversion of emulsion mud to cement
US5370181 *Aug 13, 1993Dec 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyAnti gas-migration cementing
US5370185 *Sep 8, 1993Dec 6, 1994Shell Oil CompanyMud solidification with slurry of portland cement in oil
US5379840 *Aug 19, 1993Jan 10, 1995Shell Oil CompanyHigh temperature well cementing with low grade blast furnace slag
US5379843 *Apr 22, 1994Jan 10, 1995Shell Oil CompanySide-tracking cement plug
US5398758 *Nov 30, 1993Mar 21, 1995Halliburton CompanyUtilizing drilling fluid in well cementing operations
US5423379 *Feb 4, 1994Jun 13, 1995Shell Oil CompanyMethod for drilling and cementing a well
US5464060 *Apr 12, 1994Nov 7, 1995Shell Oil CompanyMixing with Portland cement and pozzolana; applying settable filter cake on walls; activating to harden
US5499677 *Dec 23, 1994Mar 19, 1996Shell Oil CompanyEmulsion in blast furnace slag mud solidification
US5515921 *Dec 23, 1994May 14, 1996Shell Oil CompanyMethod for cementing a directional well
US5556460 *Sep 18, 1995Sep 17, 1996W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.An oxyalkylene compound and a comb polymer
US5580379 *Dec 12, 1995Dec 3, 1996Shell Oil CompanyEmulsion in blast furnace slag mud solidification
US5603760 *Sep 18, 1995Feb 18, 1997W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.Cement admixture capable of inhibiting drying shrinkage and method of using same
US5604273 *Sep 18, 1995Feb 18, 1997W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.Drying shrinkage cement admixture
US5622558 *Sep 18, 1995Apr 22, 1997W.R. Grace & Co.-ConnDrying shrinkage cement admixture
US5673753 *Apr 20, 1995Oct 7, 1997Shell Oil CompanyIn-situ cementation by addition of blast furnace slag
US5842518 *Oct 14, 1997Dec 1, 1998Soybel; Joshua RichardMethod for drilling a well in unconsolidated and/or abnormally pressured formations
US5954132 *Nov 5, 1996Sep 21, 1999Harris; Todd K.Patching of injection and production well annular casing leaks for restoring mechanical integrity
US6273191 *Feb 9, 2000Aug 14, 2001Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Preparing a cement of hydraulic cement, water reducing, dispersing, compressive strength enhancing, set retarding and set accelerating additives and water; placing in an anulus between the casing string and well bore and allowing to set
US6441054Mar 2, 2000Aug 27, 2002W.R. Grace & Co.-ConnAir management in cementitious mixtures having plasticizer and a clay-activity modifying agent
US6454004Feb 21, 2001Sep 24, 2002Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cementing casing strings in deep water offshore wells
US6630021Aug 7, 2002Oct 7, 2003Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cementing casing strings in deep water offshore wells
US6708760Nov 19, 2002Mar 23, 2004Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods and cement compositions for cementing in subterranean zones
US6793730Jun 4, 2003Sep 21, 2004Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Methods of cementing
US7008479May 5, 2004Mar 7, 2006Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.hydraulic cement slurry of carboxymethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, foam stabilizing surfactants of an ethoxylated alcohol ether sulfate, cocoylamidopropyl betaine, and cocoylamidopropyl dimethyl amine oxide; imporved rheology, fluid loss contol
US7022755Feb 4, 2005Apr 4, 2006Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.a hydraulic cement, an aqueous rubber latex and a rubber latex stabilizing surfactant comprising an iso-dodecyl alcohol ether sulfonate ethoxylated with 10 to 20 ethylene oxide units; high compressive, tensile and bond stregths; well bores
US7093658 *Oct 29, 2004Aug 22, 2006Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.treating a subterranean formation with a mixture of water, a gas, a gelling agent, and a foaming additive of an amidopropyl betaine substituted with capryloyl, a capryl, an octyl, a decyl, or a cococyl radical
US7328756Sep 22, 2004Feb 12, 2008Halliburton Energy Serivces, Inc.Settable fluids comprising particle-size distribution-adjusting agents and methods of use
US7404855Feb 4, 2005Jul 29, 2008Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cementing with a hydraulic cement, an aqueous rubber latex and a rubber latex stabilizing surfactant comprising an iso-dodecyl alcohol ether sulfonate ethoxylated with 10 to 20 ethylene oxide units; high compressive, tensile and bond stregths; well bores
US7527098May 27, 2004May 5, 2009Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cementing wellbore using formulation containing water, a metal oxide or hydroxide compound, a phosphate compound, a borate compound, and a sugar; thickening time is sufficient to allow the cement to be placed in its desired location in the wellbore before setting
US7712530Aug 9, 2007May 11, 2010Superior Energy Services, L.L.C.Pre-stressed annular sealant and method of creating a durable seal in a well bore annulus
US7910647 *Jun 8, 2006Mar 22, 2011Henkel Ag & Co. KgaaAdhesion inhibition of microorganisms by non-ionic surfactants
US7972436Jul 8, 2002Jul 5, 2011W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn.Mixture of betaine, sulfonate and polyoxyalkylene glycol nonionic surfactant; uniform porosity
US8360150Jul 27, 2010Jan 29, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cement composition containing a substituted ethoxylated phenol surfactant for use in an oil-contaminated well
US8459356Dec 13, 2012Jun 11, 2013Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.Cement composition containing a substituted ethoxylated phenol surfactant for use in an oil-contaminated well
CN1036672C *Feb 23, 1994Dec 10, 1997国际壳牌研究有限公司Method for cementing well
CN100424490CJul 23, 2003Oct 8, 2008中海油田服务股份有限公司Ambient flow determining method and device
EP0572857A2 *May 18, 1993Dec 8, 1993Basf CorporationImproved additive composition for oil well cementing formulations
WO1994019574A1 *Feb 23, 1994Sep 1, 1994Shell Canada LtdMethod for drilling and cementing a well
WO1998006678A1 *Jul 23, 1997Feb 19, 1998Grace W R & CoImproved drying shrinkage cement admixture
WO2004051004A2Dec 1, 2003Jun 17, 2004Douglas B BellMethod and apparatus for sub-sea pile-driving
Classifications
U.S. Classification166/293, 106/725, 106/724, 106/727
International ClassificationC04B28/04, C09K8/46
Cooperative ClassificationC04B28/04, C09K8/46
European ClassificationC04B28/04, C09K8/46
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 25, 2002FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Nov 2, 1998FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 8
Aug 5, 1994FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4
Mar 18, 1991ASAssignment
Owner name: SHELL OIL COMPANY, A CORP. OF DE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:COWAN, KENNETH M.;REEL/FRAME:005637/0082
Effective date: 19890224