|Publication number||US5051312 A|
|Application number||US 07/500,830|
|Publication date||Sep 24, 1991|
|Filing date||Mar 29, 1990|
|Priority date||Mar 29, 1990|
|Also published as||CA2078987A1, DE69130607D1, DE69130607T2, EP0521904A1, EP0521904B1, WO1991014730A1|
|Publication number||07500830, 500830, US 5051312 A, US 5051312A, US-A-5051312, US5051312 A, US5051312A|
|Inventors||Klas G. M. Allmer|
|Original Assignee||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (93), Classifications (38), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The invention concerns a process for modifying polymer surfaces, modified by exposure to ultraviolet and/or visible radiation while such surfaces are in contact with modifiers, which are selected organic compounds. Polymers with modified surfaces may be used to absorb biologically active molecules, may exhibit improved adhesion, useful in composites, and since the process may be used to produce patterns or images on the polymer surface, are useful in printing processes and electronics.
Modification of polymer surfaces by various methods has been practiced for many years. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 2,789,063 describes the use of a sodium/naphthalene reagent to treat poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE), to modify the surface properties. Numerous other methods have been described using other reagents to chemically modify the surface of various polymers. In addition, other methods of physical treatment, sometimes in the presence of various reagents, have also been used, such as laser ablation, exposure to various plasmas, exposure to electron beams, etc. Some of these methods are capable of forming an image (modified vs. unmodified) on the polymer surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,164,463 describes the modification of perfluorocarbon (optionally containing bromine and chlorine atoms) polymer surfaces using sulfur or phosphorous containing compounds. There are several methods of modifying the surfaces disclosed in this patent, among them (at column 8, lines 14-16) the use of "ultraviolet light" to promote the process. It is stated that the "fluoropolymer is exposed to radiation" (as opposed to the instant process where the modifier absorbs the actinic radiation, infra), and it also states that "The amount of solution or liquid in which the fluoropolymer is placed should be such that the starting material is thoroughly wetted, but not so much that the passage of radiation through the liquid is impeded." In the present process it is the modifier which is "activated" by absorbing the actinic radiation (infra).
U.S. Pat. No. 3,563,871 describes the modification of a polychloroprene rubber surface by exposure to radiation with a wavelength of 200 to 350 nm in the absence of oxygen. No other organic compound is present as a modifier.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,824,692 describes the modification of the surface of an ethylenically unsaturated rubber by irradiation of wavelength 100 to 700 nm radiation the presence of selected alkyl halides.
S. Tazuke, et. al., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, vol. 121, Washington, DC, 1980, pp. 217-241, describe the use of photografting to modify polymer surfaces. In this technique a polymerizable vinyl monomer is contacted with a polymer surface and optionally a sensitizer, and the vinyl monomer is grafted to and polymerized on the surface of the polymer, thereby modifying the surface. In the present process, readily polymerizable vinyl monomers are not used as modifying compounds.
It is the object of this invention to provide a process for the modification of various polymer surfaces which is capable of producing images on the polymer surfaces, and which uses ultraviolet and/or visible radiation, which is easy and inexpensive to generate.
A process is provided wherein polymer surfaces are modified by exposure to ultraviolet/visible radiation in the presence of selected organic modifiers. The polymers surfaces are reduced by the modifiers, and in some cases the modifiers may be grafted onto the surfaces. Such surfaces have properties, such as hydrophilicity and adhesion, altered from those of the bulk polymer. Patterns of modified and unmodified polymer surfaces may be produced. Polymers with modified surfaces are useful as printing plates, in electronics and in composites.
This invention concerns a process for modifying polymer surfaces, comprising, exposing an organic modifier to actinic radiation while a polymer surface is in contact with said organic modifier, provided that the oxidation potential of the modifier minus the reduction potential of the polymer minus the excitation energy of the modifier is less than zero,further provided that said actinic radiation is of a wavelength that is absorbed by said modifier, and further provided said polymer does not contain ethylenic unsaturation.
Any polymer may be used in the above process, provided the limitation concerning the polymer reduction potential (infra) is met, and provided the polymer does not contain ethylenic unsaturation, that is alkenyl double bonds. Preferred polymers are fluorinated polymers, polyimides and polyesters. Especially preferred polymers are perfluorinated polymers (those containing less than 0.5% by weight hydrogen and may contain chlorine or bromine in place of fluorine). Most preferred polymers are perfluorinated polymers and copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene. Polymers whose glass transition temperature and/or crystalline melting point are above ambient temperature (plastics) and elastomers are useful in this process. The elastomers may be cured or uncured.
Reduction potentials (usually expressed in volts) of polymers can be determined in several ways, especially electrochemically. See for example reduction potential of PTFE, D. J. Barker, Electrochmica Acta, vol. 23, pp. 1107-1110 (1978) and D. M. Brewis, Die Angwandte Makromolekulare Chemie, vol. 43, pp. 191-194 (1975), and the reduction potential of the polyimide from oxydianiline and pyromellitic anhydride, S. Mazur and S Reich, J. Phys. Chem., vol. 90, pp. 1365-1372 (1986). If the reduction potential of any particular polymer has not been measured, an approximation can be made by using the reduction potential of a model compound which is structurally similar to the polymer. The reduction potential of a large number of organic compounds has been compiled by Meites, et al., infra. As is well known to those skilled in the art, thesereduction potentials may vary somewhat with various experimental parameters, such as the solvent used.
By actinic radiation is meant electromagnetic radiation in the ultraviolet and visible portions of the spectrum, that of wavelengths from about 200 nm to about 700 nm. The particular wavelength of actinic radiation chosen must correspond to one or more wavelengths that are absorbed by the modifier. Absorption spectra of many organic compounds are commonly available, or may be measured by methods well known to those skilled in the art. In practice, sources of actinic radiation often have multiple or continuous wavelength outputs. Such sources are suitable so long as at least some of their output is at wavelengths that are absorbed by the modifier. There are many ways of generating such radiation, for example a medium pressure mercury lamp is commonly used.
The modifier is an organic compound that absorbs actinic radiation and whose oxidation potential minus the reduction potential of the polymer minus the excitation energy of the modifier is less than zero. Thus, thereare two criteria for the modifier that must be considered in this limitation, namely the oxidation potential and excitation energy of modifier. Oxidation potentials of organic compounds can be determined by methods known to those skilled in the art, for example by polarography. The oxidation potential of many organic compounds have been determined, and a large compilation has been made by L. Meites, P. Zuman and (in part)E. Rupp, CRC Handbook Series in Organic Electrochemistry, Vol. 1-6, CRC Press, Inc. Cleveland, Ohio and Boca Raton, Florida, published 1977-1983, which are hereby included by reference.
The "excitation energy" of the modifier is the energy of the lowest lying triplet state of the modifier molecule, expressed in electron volts. The measurement of such energies is known to those skilled in the art, for example R. S. Becker, Theory and Interpretation of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1969, chapter 7, and D. 0. Cowan and R. L. Drisko, Elements of Organic Photochemistry, Plenum Press, New York, 1976, chapter 5.2. An extensive listing of triplet state energies is found in S. L. Murov, Handbook of Photochemistry, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1973, pp. 3-25, which is hereby included by reference. In addition, the reduction potential of the modifier in the ground state should be lower than the reduction potential of the polymer, otherwise the modifier will react with itself, and not the polymer. Reduction potentials of organic compounds are found in Meites, et. al., supra.
The modifier in the present reaction does not have any substantial reactionwith the polymer (surface) in the absence of actinic radiation. Thus the use of chemical modifiers that act without actinic radiation, such as sodium/naphthalene with PTFE, are not contemplated by this invention. Somemodifiers may act with or without actinic radiation. They may, for example,for relatively short time periods and low (ambient) temperatures not modifypolymer surfaces except upon exposure to actinic radiation, but under otherconditions, such as longer time periods and/or higher temperatures, modify polymer surfaces without actinic radiation. When used under conditions under which such modifiers are not effective without actinic radiation, such modifiers are included within the instant process, but when used under conditions under which polymer surfaces are modified without actinicradiation, are not included in the instant process.
The modifiers as used herein are not vinyl monomers readily polymerized by free radicals. It is known in the art that polymer surfaces may be grafted(see Tazuke, et. al., supra) with polymerizable vinyl monomers by exposing such polymer surfaces to the monomers in the presence of a suitable radical generating agents such as a peroxide, ionizing radiation or actinic radiation. Typical vinyl monomers that are not included within thescope of the modifiers herein include acrylic acids, esters and amides, styrene, acrylonitrile, vinyl chloride, etc. Other free radically polymerizable vinyl monomers are known to those skilled in the art.
Preferred modifier/polymer combinations useful in the present invention include: perfluorinated polymers and copolymers of tetrafluoroethylene with the 4-hydroxybenzenethiol dianion, p-aminobenzenethiol anion, benzenethiol anion, the dianion of HSCHRCHROH where R is hydrogen or methyl, the anion of 2,5-pentanedione, the anion of diphenylcarbinol, 2-mercaptoethanol, tetrachlorohydroquinone, 4-aminofluorene, phenylthiazine, cis-stilbene, vanillin, the anion of 2-mercaptoethanol, the anion of 2-naphthol, the anion of dibenzoylmethane, the dianion of ethylene glycol, and N,N,N'N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine; polyimide based on oxydianiline and pyromellitic anhydride with 4-aminofluorene, thedianion of ethylene glycol, the dianion of 3-hydroxybutane-3-thiol, and vanillin (4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde); poly(ethylene terephthalate) with the anion of 4-aminobenzenethiol; and a copolymer of TFE with perfluoro(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole) with N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine. An especially preferred modifier/polymer combination is a copolymer of TFE with perfluoro(2,2-dimethy1,3-dioxole) and N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine. In the above combinations, if a modifier is an anion, an appropriate metal cation is a counterion. Alkali metal cations are preferred.
The modifier and polymer may be brought into contact by a variety of means.For example, the modifier may be dissolved in an inert solvent, the solution being contacted with the polymer surface. Alternatively, a thin layer of the modifier may be coated onto the polymer surface or the polymer surface may be exposed to modifier vapor. It is preferred if the polymer surface is contacted with a modifier in solution. The solvents forsuch solutions should not absorb actinic radiation at the same wavelength as the modifier, so that any actinic radiation applied may reach and activate the modifier. Also the reduction potential of the solvent should be below that of the polymer, so that the polymer and not the solvent reacts with the modifier. Preferred solvents are polar aprotic solvents that meet the above conditions. Especially preferred solvents (where appropriate) are N,N-dimethylformamide, dimethylsulfoxide, acetonitrile and dimethylacetamide. Water and alcohols are also preferred solvents. Thesolvent should not dissolve the polymer. Typical concentrations of modifierin solvent are about 0.001 to about 0.2M. Preferred concentrations of modifier are about 0.025 to about 0.1M. The solution layer (or coated layer or vapor space) between the light source and the polymer surface should be relatively thin, so that as much of the absorbable (by the modifier) actinic radiation as possible reaches the modifier very close tothe polymer surface. It is believed that the "activated" modifier molecules, that is those that have absorbed actinic radiation, have a short lifetime, and only those modifier molecules that absorb actinic radiation close to the polymer surface actually are effective in modifyingthe polymer surface.
The process may be run in any apparatus suitable for containing the polymerpiece(s) and the modifier. If the polymer pieces are simply coated with themodifier, the coated polymer may be directly exposed to the actinic radiation. If modifier solution or vapor must be contained, the container must be transparent to actinic radiation of the wavelength absorbed by themodifier, or the actinic radiation source must be inside the container. A container material transparent to actinic radiation of the wavelength range of the process is fused quartz.
Temperature and pressure are not critical, and the process is conveniently run at ambient conditions.
While modifier/polymer combinations meeting the criteria of the process have been found to be operative, it has also been found that some modifier/polymer combinations are more efficient than others. By efficiency in this context is meant the ability to modify the polymer surface under given conditions in a specific amount of time. A semiquantitative measure of surface modification can be obtained by measurement of a surface property, such as the contact angle of the surface with a given liquid. The relative efficiency of any particular modifier/polymer pair under a given set of conditions cannot be predicted,but can be determined by simple experimentation (see for instance, Examples1-14). It is believed that in efficient systems the modifier oxidation potential minus the reduction potential of the polymer minus the excitation energy of the modifier is more negative than about -0.5 volt, and such modifier/polymer combinations are preferred. It is also believed that, when the modifier contacts the polymer as a solution or liquid, the surface modification process is more efficient if the solution wets the polymer surface well.
Optionally, compounds herein termed accelerators may be used in the process. While these accelerators are not in themselves modifiers (they donot modify the polymer surface in the presence of actinic radiation), theirpresence in the process accelerates or makes the process more efficient. Ithas been found that certain aromatic compounds such as benzophenone, thioxanthon, and naphthalene are effective and preferred accelerators. Typical concentrations for accelerators are about 0.001 to about 0.1M. It has been found that when accelerators are used, actinic radiation that canbe absorbed by the accelerator and/or modifier is effective in modifying the polymer surface. Accelerators are not polymerizable vinyl monomers (supra).
By masking or blocking out the actinic radiation from a portion of the polymer surface (or more correctly, modifier near the polymer surface), itis possible to create patterns on the polymer surface consisting of modified and unmodified surface. Of course the unmodified surface will exist where the modifier near the surface was not exposed to the actinic radiation. Using a relatively crude apparatus, resolution as small as 0.1 mm was obtained, see Example 46. Varying degrees of surface modification may be obtained by partially filtering the actinic radiation, so that different intensities of actinic radiation are obtained over different parts of the polymer surface. The same effect can be obtained by varying the exposure time to actinic radiation.
It has, surprisingly, been found that the modified polymer surfaces in manycases are either colorless or only lightly colored. This is in contrast to many processes which use powerful chemical reductants, such as sodium/naphthalene with PTFE, where intense dark surface colors are generated. This is an advantage for the instant process, when surface color is important.
Polymers with modified surfaces are useful as printing plates, in electronics, composites (where improved adhesion to the polymer surface isrequired), for immobilizing biologically active molecules (see Example 21),for forming conductive surfaces, for forming antistatic surfaces, and for metalization (see Example 47).
In the following Examples, Teflon® AF containing 70% fluorinated dioxazolane units was obtained from Du Pont. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), poly(tetrafluoroethylene co hexafluoropropylene) (Teflon® FEP), and polyimide based on pyrometallic dianhydride and oxydianiline (Kapton®) are available commercially from E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Wilmington, Del. and were used as received.
The organic sodium salts were prepared by reacting the compounds with sodium methoxide in methanol solution with subsequent evaporation and drying. All other reagents or solvents are available commercially and wereused as received, except benzophenone which was recrystallized from methanol.
The following abbbreviations for the modifiers are used: ##STR1##
In a quartz beaker with a flat bottom, a PTFE film (2×3 cm) was placed onto a frame made of alumina foil. The PTFE film was pressed down against the bottom by applying a flat piece of glass over it as weight. The solution containing donor and optionally accelerator was prepared and nitrogen was bubbled through for 10 minutes. This solution was then added to the quartz beaker, the beaker was flushed with nitrogen, and then it was placed above a 100 W medium pressure mercury lamp with main emittance at 366 nm. After UV exposure, the film was taken out of the beaker, rinsedin acetone, immersed in boiling water for 1 hour, and then Soxhlet extracted with tetrahydrofuran for 18 hours.
The parts of the film which were exposed to UV light had improved wetting and usually got colored, ranging from weak yellow to black, while parts which were shielded from UV light remained hydrophobic and colorless. Whenthe samples were treated with boiling water, the colored areas got fainter and turned brown/yellow.
Advancing contact angle was measured by applying a 10 μl water droplet on the PTFE surface and measuring the diameter of the surface [Dahlgren, Journal of Immunological Methods, 40, 171-179 (1981)]. Results are given in Table 1.
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________ Exposure Contact Angle Surface Composition from ESCA (%)ExampleModifier Solvent Accelerator (min) against water F C O N S__________________________________________________________________________1 SBH (S) DMF -- 60 73° 34 53 10 1.5 --2 SBH(S) isopropanol -- 60 74°3 DSMB(S) DMF -- 60 49° 5.3 67 19 1 64 DSMB(S) DMF -- 2 79°5 DSMB(S) DMF benzophenone 2 71° (0.025M)6 SATP DMF -- 10 71° 10 67 15 3.7 3.9(0.025M)7 SATP DMF -- 60 51° 10 68 14 3.9 4.8(0.025M)8 SATP(S) acetonitrile -- 60 -- 6.7 63 13 3.7 3.49 SPD DMF -- 60 72° 30 48 13 0.4 0.2(0.05M)10 SPD isopropanol -- 60 -- 39 44 10 0.3 0.1(00.05M)11 DSME(S) DMF -- 60 72° 26 54 14 1.1 3.612 DSME(S) DMF naphtalene 60 62 5.7 62 26 0.7 4.9 (0.05M)13 DSME(S) DMF triphenylene 60 55° (0.05M)14 Untreated PTFE -- -- 115° 68 31 0.2 0.1 --__________________________________________________________________________
A piece of PTFE film (10×15 cm) was put in a transparent low density polyethylene (LDPE) bag (15×20 cm) with a zip-lock. A solution containing 15 ml DMF, 0.045 g DSMB and 0.068 g benzophenone was added to the bag. The bag was flushed with nitrogen for 1 minute, sealed and placedhorizontally. An aluminum frame and quartz glass was placed above the bag. The bag was exposed to UV light for 10 minutes from a 100 W medium pressure lamp situated 10 cm from the bag. After exposure, the PTFE film was rinsed with acetone, immersed in hot water for 60 minutes and Soxhlet extracted with THF for 18 hours. The film was gray colored on the areas exposed to UV light, the gray area got brown/yellow after water treatment.The contact angle against water of the exposed film was 56°, a decrease of about 60° compared to untreated PTFE.
A piece of Teflon® FEP (a copolymer of TFE and hexafluoropropylene) film (10×15 cm) was put in a transparent LDPE bag (15×20 cm) with a zip-lock. A solution containing 15 ml DMF 0.09 g DSMB and 0.068 g benzophenone was added to the bag. The bag was flushed with nitrogen for 1minute, sealed and placed horizontally. An aluminum frame and quartz glass was placed on top of the bag. The bag was exposed to UV light for 30 minutes from a 100 W medium pressure lamp situated 10 cm from the bag. After exposure, the PTFE film was rinsed with acetone and immersed in hot water for 60 minutes. The film was faint 9ray/brown color in the areas exposed to UV light, turning weakly yellow after water treatment. The contact angle of a 25/75 ethanol/water mixture decreased from 70° to 42° by this treatment.
A piece of Teflon® AF [copolymer of TFE and perfluoro(2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxole)]film was put in a quartz beaker on topof an aluminum frame with a flat piece of glass above as weight. A solutioncontaining 50 ml DMF, 0.37 g SATP and 0.82 g TMPDA was added to the quartz beaker. The beaker was flushed with nitrogen, and placed above a 100 W medium pressure mercury lamp for 3 hours. After exposure the Teflon® AF film was rinsed with acetone and immersed in hot water for 2 hours. Thefilm was patchwise yellow on the exposed areas. The contact angle against a25/75 ethanol/water mixture varied between 20°-40° on the areas exposed to UV light, untreated Teflon® AF has a contact angle of74°.
A piece of Kapton® film (polyimide from oxydianiline and pyrometallic anhydride) (3×2 cm) was put in a quartz beaker on top of an aluminumframe with a flat piece of glass above as weight. A solution containing 50 ml DMF, 0.45 g 2-aminofluorene was added to the quartz beaker. The beaker was flushed with nitrogen, and placed above a 100 W medium pressure mercury lamp for 1 hour. After exposure the Kapton® film was rinsed with acetone and water. The film got darker on the exposed areas, and the contact angle against water of the reduced film was 41° . A Kapton® film which was immersed in the same reducing solution, but in dark for 72 hours had a contact angle of 64°.
A piece of Kapton® film (3×2 cm) was put in a quartz beaker on top of a frame made from a transparent polyethylene film, and with a flat piece of glass above as weight. A solution containing 50 ml water, 0.45 g vanillin and 0.2 g sodium hydroxide was added to the quartz beaker. The beaker was flushed with nitrogen, and placed above a 100 W medium pressuremercury lamp for 30 minutes. After exposure the Kapton® film was immersed in 0.01 M HCl(aq) for 1 hour, and then rinsed with water. The exposed film had a contact angle against water of 24°, while a filmwhich had been treated the same way, but without UV exposure had a contact angle of 46°.
The PTFE film reduced in Example 3, was electroless plated with the following procedure:
The film was dipped in a water solution containing 0.1% PdC12 for 1 minute,dried, and then immersed in a 0.1 M NaBH4 solution for another minute. Thisactivates the surface by depositing zero valent palladium onto the surface.The film was electroless plated with nickel by immersing in a 0.1 1 water solution containing 2.38 g NiC12, 2.12 g NaH2PO2xH2O, 25.4 g 50% gluconic acid, 5 ml NH40H, and 2 g NaOH.
The film is only nickel plated on the areas which were exposed to UV light,the shaded surface areas remain hydrophobic PTFE even after the plating procedure.
The plated nickel adheres well enough to withstand a Scotch tape (Trademark, 3M Corp.) peel test.
A piece of PTFE film (10×15 cm) was put in a transparent LDPE bag (15×20 cm) with a zip-lock. To the bag 0.048 g DSMB in 15 ml DMF wasadded. The bag was flushed with nitrogen for 1 minute, sealed and placed horizontally. An aluminum frame and quartz glass was placed on top of the bag. The bag was exposed to UV light from a 100 W medium pressure lamp situated at cm distance. After exposure, the PTFE film was rinsed with acetone, then refluxed with NH3(aq) for 1 hour, and immersed in hot water for another hour.
The film was cut into 3×5 mm pieces, put in a vial and washed three times with N-dimethylformamide (DMF). After washing, the film pieces were put in 10 ml DMF solution containing 70 mg biotin-N-succinimide ester for 4 hours. The biotin treated film was washed with the following procedure:
3×20 ml DMF
3×20 ml water buffered to pH 7
3×20 ml water Containing 0.2 % Zonyl® FSN, available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., that has been purified 4×20 ml water buffered to pH 7
The PTFE film pieces was dried on paper, and transferred to a vial with 1.2ml DMF containing 1.74 mg streptavidin and 60 ul 4-hydroxyazobenzene-2'-carboxylic acid. After 45 minutes, the absorbance at 500 nm was measured, and the amount of streptavidin bonded to the surface was calculated from a standard curve. To 1 g exposed PTFE 390 ng streptavidin was bonded, while to nonexposed PTFE only 260 ng was attached.
The procedure was the same as for Examples 1-14, but with polymers other than PTFE in some examples. Contact angle was usually measured with a water solution containing 25% ethanol, and the decrease in contact angle compared to a untreated polymer is given in the table. Modifier concentration is 0.05 M, or saturated solution (S). The results are shown in Table 2.
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________ Modifier + Exposure Decrease inExamplePolymer Accelerator Solvent (min) Contact Angle__________________________________________________________________________21 PTFE Mercaptoethanol THF 60 7° + 0.06% Naphtalene22 PTFE Tetrachlorohydro- DMF 120 13° quionone23 PTFE 2-Aminofluorene DMF 120 21°24 PTFE Phenylthiazine DMF 120 15°25 PTFE Cis-stilbene DMF 120 13°26 PTFE 2-Picoline Water 120 16°27 PTFE vanillin(S) Water 120 16°28 PTFE Sodiumthio- DMF 60 43° phenoxide29 PTFE Monosodium- DMF 60 40° mercaptoethanol30 PTFE N,N-dimethyl- DMF 60 23° aniline (0.1M)31 Teflon ®Sodiumthiophen- DMF 60 49°FEP oxide + benzophenone32 Kapton ® DSME(S) DMF 60 26° + Naphtalene33 PTFE Sodium 2-naphten- DMF 60 32° oxide (S)34 PTFE Disodium 4- DMF 60 67° hydroxythiphenoxide (S)35 PTFE Sodium salt of DMF 60 36° dibenzoylmethane (S)36 PTFE Sodium 4-amino DMF 60 55° thiophenoxide (S)37 PTFE N,N,N',N'-tetra- DMF 60 45° methylphenylenediamine38 PTFE Disodiumethan- DMF 60 51° thioxide (S)39 Teflon ® Disodiumethan- DMF 60 13°AF thioxide (S)40 Teflon ® SATP (S) DMF 60 18°AF41 Teflon ® Disodium 4- DMF 60 15°AF hydroxythiophenoxide (S)42 Kapton ® Disodiumethan- DMF 30 18° thioxide (S) + benzophenone43 Kapton ® TMPDA DMF 30 9°44 Mylar ® SATP DMF 60 11°__________________________________________________________________________
A PTFE film was immersed for 15 minutes in a tetrahydrofuran (THF) solutioncontaining 0.1 M TMPDA, then dried, first in air, then under vacuum for 15 minutes. The film was placed in a LDPE bag with zip-lock, flushed with nitrogen for 1 minute, and then sealed. The film in the LDPE bag was then exposed to UV light (366 nm) for 2 hours. This treatment gave a 22°decrease in contact angle, measured with 25% ethanol in water.
A PTFE film was placed in a LDPE bag (10×15 cm) with zip-lock and 15 ml of a DMF solution containing 0.1 M monosodiumthioethanol and 0.05 M thioxanthone was added. The bag was flushed with nitrogen for 1 minute, sealed, and the placed horizontally on a flat support. A patterned mask was placed above the LDPE film, and a quartz plate was placed over the mask. The PTFE film was exposed to UV light through the mask, and the areas exposed to UV light turned to a grey/yellow metallic looking surfacewith high wettability, while the areas shaded to UV light was colorless andhydrophobic. Even with this crude setup, a resolution of 0.1 mm was obtained.
A PTFE film was modified as in Example 15, but was not immersed in hot water nor Soxhlet extracted with THF after the exposure. The contact angleagainst water was 42°. The film was metallized with the following procedure.
The film was dipped into 0.1 M NaOH for 1 min, rinsed with flowing water, dipped while still wet in a 3% aqueous solution of Cataposit (Registered Trademark of the Shipley Co., Newton, Massachusetts) at 25° C., dipped for 2 min in a 3% aqueous Cataposit solution at 42°-45° C., rinsed for 30 sec in cool flowing tapwater, dipped for 3 min in a 10% aqueous solution of accelerator 19 (Shipley Co.), dipped for 45 sec in Niklad 752 (Registered Trademark, Witco Chemical Corp.), rinsed in cool flowing water, and copper electroplated at0.016 amp/cm2 for 90 min, when the metal layer was 0.036 mm thick.
The adhesive strength is 4 pounds/inch. If the sample is immersed in hot water for an hour prior to the metal plating the adhesive strength is only0.15 pounds/inch.
N,N,-dimethyl aniline does not absorb UV light above 340 nm, while thioxanthon has a absorption maxima at 380 nm. Three DMF solutions were prepared: A contained 0.1 M N,N-dimethylaniline, B contained 0.05 M thioxanthon, and C contained 0.1 M N,N-dimethylanilin+0.05 M thioxanthon. PTFE film was exposed to 366 nm (bandpass filter used) for 1 hour with thesame setup as in experiments 1-14. After exposure the films were extensively rinsed with with acetone, and contact angle measured from 25% EtOH in water. Solution A had a contact angle of 73°, B had 77°, and C. had 62°. Pure PTFE has a contact angle of 78°.
By the same procedure used in Examples 1-14, Teflon® AF film was exposed to actinic radiation while immersed in a 0.05 M solution of N,N,N',N'-tetramethyl-p-phenylenediamine in N,N-dimethylformamide. After exposure for 1 hr, the contact angle of 25% ethanol in water had decreased18°.
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described hereinabove, it is to be understood that there is no intention to limit the invention to the precise constructions herein disclosed, and it is to be further understood that the right is reserved to all changes coming within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2789063 *||Mar 26, 1954||Apr 16, 1957||Minnesota Mining & Mfg||Method of activating the surface of perfluorocarbon polymers and resultant article|
|US3563871 *||Nov 14, 1969||Feb 16, 1971||Ford Motor Co||Process for reducing the surface friction of an elastomer using radiation and an oxygen free atmosphere|
|US4164463 *||Apr 11, 1978||Aug 14, 1979||E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company||Hydrophilic fluoropolymers|
|US4309453 *||Jan 28, 1980||Jan 5, 1982||Battelle-Institut E.V.||Process and compounds for surface modification of macromolecular substances|
|US4824692 *||Jul 27, 1987||Apr 25, 1989||The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company||Process for the surface treatment of unsaturated rubber by photochemical modification with alkyl halides|
|US4839261 *||Sep 15, 1987||Jun 13, 1989||Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha||Photocurable laminate|
|1||*||S. Tazuke et al., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, vol. 121 (1980), pp. 217 241.|
|2||S. Tazuke et al., American Chemical Society Symposium Series, vol. 121 (1980), pp. 217-241.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5229163 *||Apr 26, 1991||Jul 20, 1993||Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.||Process for preparing a microtiter tray for immunometric determinations|
|US5320789 *||Nov 4, 1992||Jun 14, 1994||Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute||Surface modification of fluorine resin with laser light|
|US5380474 *||May 20, 1993||Jan 10, 1995||Sandia Corporation||Methods for patterned deposition on a substrate|
|US5429838 *||Oct 5, 1993||Jul 4, 1995||Pharmacia Ab||Method for the production of intraocular lenses|
|US5587273 *||Jun 7, 1995||Dec 24, 1996||Advanced Microbotics Corporation||Molecularly imprinted materials, method for their preparation and devices employing such materials|
|US5594041 *||Jun 7, 1995||Jan 14, 1997||Southwest Research Institute||Methods for increasing structural integrity of polymers and polymers treated by such methods|
|US5696207 *||Sep 3, 1996||Dec 9, 1997||Geo-Centers, Inc.||Fluroropolymeric substrates with metallized surfaces and methods for producing the same|
|US5703173 *||Aug 16, 1996||Dec 30, 1997||Integument Technologies, Inc.||Transition metallohalopolymers|
|US5721293 *||Oct 31, 1995||Feb 24, 1998||Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute Of Tokyo||Method of imparting organic functional groups to the surface of fluoropolymers by irradiation of carboxylic acids with ultraviolet light|
|US5853894 *||Feb 3, 1997||Dec 29, 1998||Cytonix Corporation||Laboratory vessel having hydrophobic coating and process for manufacturing same|
|US5859086 *||Aug 7, 1997||Jan 12, 1999||Competitive Technologies Of Pa, Inc.||Light directed modification fluoropolymers|
|US5889073 *||Oct 29, 1997||Mar 30, 1999||Dainippon Ink & Chemicals, Inc.||Process for producing material with hydrophilic surface|
|US5945486 *||Sep 29, 1997||Aug 31, 1999||Geo-Centers, Inc.||Fluoropolymeric substrates with metallized surfaces and methods for producing the same|
|US5967714 *||Mar 6, 1998||Oct 19, 1999||Huels Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the preparation of antimicrobial plastics|
|US6001894 *||Apr 14, 1998||Dec 14, 1999||Huels Aktiengesellschaft||Process for modifying the surface of polymer substrates by graft polymerization|
|US6203856||Sep 14, 1999||Mar 20, 2001||Huels Aktiengesellschaft||Process for the preparation of antimicrobial plastics|
|US6428887||Jan 27, 1999||Aug 6, 2002||Integument Technologies, Inc.||Adhesive oxyhalopolymer composites|
|US6451386 *||Aug 30, 2000||Sep 17, 2002||Pti Advanced Filtration, Inc.||Modified polymer having improved properties and process for manufacturing same|
|US6495624||Mar 30, 2001||Dec 17, 2002||Cytonix Corporation||Hydrophobic coating compositions, articles coated with said compositions, and processes for manufacturing same|
|US6630047||May 21, 2001||Oct 7, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US6685793||May 21, 2001||Feb 3, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US6752894||Dec 14, 2001||Jun 22, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Process for modifying a polymeric surface|
|US6753087||May 21, 2001||Jun 22, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding|
|US6767587||Oct 17, 2002||Jul 27, 2004||Cytonix Corporation||Hydrophobic coating compositions, articles coated with said compositions, and processes for manufacturing same|
|US6844030||Dec 14, 2001||Jan 18, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Process for modifying a polymeric surface|
|US6986947||Oct 9, 2003||Jan 17, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymer and articles thereby|
|US7140413||Oct 12, 2005||Nov 28, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymer and articles thereby|
|US7175733||Sep 19, 2003||Feb 13, 2007||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US7223312||Jul 1, 2004||May 29, 2007||Integument Technologies, Inc.||Methods and materials for reducing damage from environmental electromagnetic effects|
|US7235302||Aug 25, 2003||Jun 26, 2007||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US7268179||Sep 30, 2003||Sep 11, 2007||Cytonix Corporation||Hydrophobic coating compositions, articles coated with said compositions, and processes for manufacturing same|
|US7273531||Nov 5, 2003||Sep 25, 2007||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymeric substrate and composite articles thereby|
|US7485371||Jul 30, 2004||Feb 3, 2009||3M Innovative Properties Company||Bonding compositions|
|US7579056||Dec 29, 2006||Aug 25, 2009||Cytonix Corporation||Hydrophobic formulations and vessel surfaces comprising same|
|US7611629||Jul 9, 2003||Nov 3, 2009||Pall Corporation||UV treated membranes|
|US7629016 *||Dec 8, 2009||Council of Industrial and Scientific Research||Process for photochemical activation of polymer surface and immobilization of biomolecules onto the activated surface|
|US7745545||Sep 12, 2007||Jun 29, 2010||3M Innovative Properties Company||Bonding compositions|
|US7781027||Aug 24, 2010||Cytonix Llc|
|US7833419||Oct 2, 2009||Nov 16, 2010||Pall Corporation||UV treated membranes|
|US7999013||Aug 16, 2011||Cytonix, Llc||Hydrophobic coating compositions and articles coated with said compositions|
|US8053230||Nov 8, 2011||Nalge Nunc International Corporation||Culture dish with lid|
|US8168264||May 1, 2012||Cytonix Llc|
|US8187664 *||Feb 8, 2006||May 29, 2012||Fujifilm Corporation||Metallic pattern forming method, metallic pattern obtained thereby, printed wiring board using the same, and TFT wiring board using the same|
|US8221870||Sep 9, 2009||Jul 17, 2012||Cytonix Llc||Articles comprising hydrophobic surfaces|
|US8227522 *||Jul 24, 2012||Mitsuba Corporation||Surface-modified blade rubber, wiper unit, and blade rubber surface modifying method|
|US8252364||Nov 29, 2004||Aug 28, 2012||Fujifilm Corporation||Metal pattern forming method, metal pattern obtained by the same, printed wiring board, conductive film forming method, and conductive film obtained by the same|
|US8372894 *||Feb 23, 2009||Feb 12, 2013||Belenos Clean Power Holding Ag||Method for producing a radiation on grafted polymer|
|US8574714 *||Feb 17, 2009||Nov 5, 2013||Kba-Giori S.A.||Method of manufacturing an engraved plate|
|US8653213||Aug 16, 2011||Feb 18, 2014||Cytonix, Llc||Hydrophobic coating compositions and articles coated with said compositions|
|US8758974||Dec 12, 2003||Jun 24, 2014||Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College||Photoresist-free micropatterning on polymer surfaces|
|US8785556||Apr 30, 2012||Jul 22, 2014||Cytonix, Llc||Hydrophobic coating compositions and articles coated with said compositions|
|US8974869 *||Jan 26, 2010||Mar 10, 2015||Robert Hamilton||Method for improving plating on non-conductive substrates|
|US9067238||Jan 15, 2013||Jun 30, 2015||Macdermid Acumen, Inc.||Method for improving plating on non-conductive substrates|
|US20020081921 *||Jun 4, 2001||Jun 27, 2002||Vargo Terrence G.||Methods and materials for reducing damage from environmental electromagnetic effects|
|US20030228410 *||Jun 10, 2002||Dec 11, 2003||Pradip Nahar||Process for photochemical activation of polymer surface and immobilization of biomolecules onto the activated surface|
|US20040058161 *||Aug 25, 2003||Mar 25, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US20040069403 *||Sep 19, 2003||Apr 15, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding composition and method|
|US20040126708 *||Dec 31, 2002||Jul 1, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method for modifying the surface of a polymeric substrate|
|US20040131789 *||Oct 17, 2002||Jul 8, 2004||Brown James F.|
|US20040191703 *||Dec 12, 2003||Sep 30, 2004||Soper Steven A.||Photoresist-free micropatterning on polymer surfaces|
|US20040197568 *||Apr 16, 2004||Oct 7, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Fluoropolymer bonding|
|US20050003203 *||Jul 26, 2004||Jan 6, 2005||Cytonix Corporation||Hydrophobic coating compositions and articles coated with said compositions|
|US20050080212 *||Oct 9, 2003||Apr 14, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymer and articles thereby|
|US20050092429 *||Nov 5, 2003||May 5, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymeric substrate and composite articles thereby|
|US20050150596 *||Jul 1, 2004||Jul 14, 2005||Vargo Terrence G.||Methods and materials for reducing damage from environmental electromagnetic effects|
|US20050208308 *||Apr 29, 2005||Sep 22, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Bonding compositions|
|US20050233150 *||Jul 30, 2004||Oct 20, 2005||3M Innovative Properties Company||Bonding compositions|
|US20050247629 *||Jul 9, 2003||Nov 10, 2005||Pall Corporation||UV treated membranes|
|US20060029812 *||Oct 12, 2005||Feb 9, 2006||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method of modifying a fluoropolymer and articles thereby|
|US20060078709 *||Oct 7, 2004||Apr 13, 2006||Lue Brian C||Process for controlling wettability of electrochemical plating component surfaces|
|US20070224616 *||Mar 23, 2007||Sep 27, 2007||Erdogan Gulari||Method for forming molecular sequences on surfaces|
|US20070246249 *||Nov 29, 2004||Oct 25, 2007||Takeyoshi Kano||Metal Pattern Forming Methd, Metal Pattern Obtained by the Same, Printed Wiring Board, Conductive Film Forming Method, and Conductive Film Obtained by the Same|
|US20070281110 *||Aug 9, 2007||Dec 6, 2007||Cytonix Corporation|
|US20080016644 *||Jul 13, 2007||Jan 24, 2008||Mitsuba Corporation||Surface-modified blade rubber, wiper unit, and blade rubber surface modifying method|
|US20080064090 *||Aug 28, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||Nalge Nunc International||Culture dish with lid|
|US20080064825 *||Sep 12, 2007||Mar 13, 2008||3M Innovative Properties Company||Bonding compositions|
|US20090022885 *||Feb 8, 2006||Jan 22, 2009||Fujifilm Corporation||Metallic pattern forming method, metallic pattern obtained thereby, printed wiring board using the same, and tft wiring board using the same|
|US20090223927 *||Feb 17, 2009||Sep 10, 2009||Kba-Giori S.A.||Method of manufacturing an engraved plate|
|US20100018925 *||Oct 2, 2009||Jan 28, 2010||Pall Corporation||Uv treated membranes|
|US20100021689 *||Sep 9, 2009||Jan 28, 2010||Cytonix Llc||Articles comprising hydrophobic surfaces|
|US20100316810 *||Aug 23, 2010||Dec 16, 2010||Cytonix Llc|
|US20110088934 *||Dec 21, 2010||Apr 21, 2011||Fujifilm Corporation||Metal pattern forming method, metal pattern obtained by the same, printed wiring board, conductive film forming method, and conductive film obtained by the same|
|US20110183082 *||Jan 26, 2010||Jul 28, 2011||Robert Hamilton||Method for Improving Plating on Non-Conductive Substrates|
|US20110245365 *||Feb 23, 2009||Oct 6, 2011||Belenos Clean Power Holding Ag||Method for producing a radiation grafted polymer|
|EP0920459A1 *||Aug 6, 1997||Jun 9, 1999||Integument Technologies, Inc.||Transition metallohalopolymers|
|EP1698218A1 *||Nov 29, 2004||Sep 6, 2006||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Metal pattern forming method, metal pattern obtained by the same, printed wiring board, conductive film forming method, and conductive film obtained by the same|
|WO2002024383A1 *||Sep 20, 2001||Mar 28, 2002||Integument Technologies, Inc.||Methods and materials for reducing damage from environmental electromagnetic effects|
|WO2002094914A2 *||Mar 13, 2002||Nov 28, 2002||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method for bonding a fluoropolymer to a substrate and composite article resulting therefrom|
|WO2002094914A3 *||Mar 13, 2002||Mar 13, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Co||Method for bonding a fluoropolymer to a substrate and composite article resulting therefrom|
|WO2003051965A1 *||Oct 21, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Process for modifying a polymeric surface|
|WO2003051966A1 *||Oct 21, 2002||Jun 26, 2003||3M Innovative Properties Company||Improved process for modifying a polymeric surface|
|WO2004060983A1 *||Nov 5, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||3M Innovative Properties Company||Method for modifying the surface of a polymeric substrate|
|WO2014113618A1 *||Jan 17, 2014||Jul 24, 2014||Celgard, Llc||Surface modifying agents, modified materials and methods|
|U.S. Classification||428/458, 427/519, 264/446, 427/520, 522/126, 522/120, 427/2.13, 522/127, 522/134, 428/463, 522/14, 427/518, 522/129, 427/509|
|International Classification||B29C59/16, G01N33/543, H05K3/18, B29C35/08, H05K3/38, A61L33/00, C08J7/12, H05K1/03, C08J7/00|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10T428/31699, G01N33/54353, B29C2035/0833, H05K3/185, B29C2035/0827, B29C59/16, H05K3/381, Y10T428/31681, H05K1/034, C08J7/12, H05K2203/1168|
|European Classification||B29C59/16, G01N33/543F, H05K3/18B2C, C08J7/12|
|Jul 11, 1990||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, WILMINGTON,
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:ALLMER, KLAS GOSTA MAGNUS;REEL/FRAME:005390/0496
Effective date: 19900327
|Feb 21, 1995||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 22, 1999||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Dec 25, 2002||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12