|Publication number||US5142619 A|
|Application number||US 07/752,882|
|Publication date||Aug 25, 1992|
|Filing date||Aug 23, 1991|
|Priority date||Feb 21, 1990|
|Publication number||07752882, 752882, US 5142619 A, US 5142619A, US-A-5142619, US5142619 A, US5142619A|
|Inventors||John W. Webster, III|
|Original Assignee||International Business Machines Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (14), Non-Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (83), Classifications (10), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/482,470 filed Feb. 21, 1990, now abandoned.
This invention relates to a method and an apparatus for visually comparing files in a data processing system.
During the course of text or word processing, it is quite common for a user to compare, or want to compare, two substantially similar files or portions thereof, to ascertain the differences. Quite obviously, the user can do so by proofreading, i.e., visually comparing the two files word-by-word and noting any differences. Such method is time consuming particularly for long documents. Some data processing systems facilitate such method by allowing the user to display the files on separate screens, on a split screen, or in windows on a screen. Some systems employ software which compares the files character-by-character and produces a printout indicating which lines are the same, which lines have been changed, which lines have been deleted, and which lines have been inserted. The user must then take the printout and compare it with one of the files to locate all of the changes.
The commercially available WordPerfect word processor, version 5.0, available from WordPerfect Corporation, has a document compare function which compares a document on screen with a document on disk and redlines text on the screen which does not appear in the text on disk. Text, which exists in the file on disk but not in the file originally on screen, is copied to the screen and indicated with strikeout codes. In general, the prior art methods of software comparison has treated the problem as one of text comparison using text string matching and sorting while the method of the invention, as described in more detail hereinafter, uses a different approach by exploiting raster graphics or bit mapping technology to provide a rapid visual comparison.
Personal Editor/2 word processor, commercially available from IBM Corporation, has a feature which allows a visual comparison to be made rapidly. The two files to be compared are loaded into storage, using the edit function, and placed in a ring buffer. These two files should be the only ones currently loaded. Next, the texts for the separate screens are edited or moved about to bring the portions to be compared into similar positions on their respective screens. Then by holding down the editing function key (F8), the screens for the two files are rapidly and successively switched so that differences and common areas of text, are readily apparent.
One of the objects of the invention is to provide a method which rapidly presents a user with a visual comparison of two files or portions thereof.
Another object is to provide a method for displaying only the differences between two files being compared.
Still another object is to compare two text items, not on the basis of actual text or characters, but on the basis of pixel contents to ascertain areas of identity and differences.
A further object is to provide a windowing system in which two items being compared can be placed in separate windows, and differences between the two items displayed in a third window.
A still further object is to allow at least one of two items being compared to be edited while the effects of the editing are effectively immediately presented to the user on a screen in such a manner that any differences between the two items are immediately apparent.
Briefly, in accordance with the invention, the advantage of which will be apparent from the simplicity of the solution, representations of two items being compared are first respectively stored in one or more bit planes. Such representations are compared and the results stored in another area of the same bit plane or a different one. The results are then displayed, providing the user with a visual comparison.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a data processing system embodying the invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the method of the invention;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating further details of the invention; and
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a display screen illustrating use of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings and first to FIG. 1, the invention is embodied in a data processing system including a personal computer 10 that comprises a processor 12, a memory system 14, a keyboard 16, and a graphics system 18 all of which are interconnected by a bus system 20. Optionally but preferably, the system further includes a mouse 22. Stored in memory system 14 are an operating system 24, a raster graphics subsystem 26, a windowing system 28, and an application program 30 that performs word processing and visual file comparison, as described in detail below.
Except for some of the details of program 30, all of the other elements are well known, conventional items. Personal computer 10 is preferably an IBM Personal System/2 computer provided with an OS/2 operating system 24 that includes Presentation Manager windowing system 28 and graphics device interface (GDI) subsystem 26. (IBM, Personal System/2, and OS/2 are trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation). Computer 10 operates in a conventional fashion. Processor 12 executes programs that are stored in memory system 14 which system includes conventional devices (not shown) such as read only memory, random access memory, cache, hard disc and floppy disc as appropriate to the particular model computer being used. Keyboard 16 is used to input text and information from the user into the system, mouse 22 is useful in manipulating windows and files, and graphics system 18 displays information for viewing by the user. The combined function of the graphics system, the mouse, and the keyboard is to provide interaction between the user and the computer. Program 30 provides an on-line, interactive, visual file comparison system, in the manner described in more detail hereinafter.
System 18 includes a video controller 32, a video random access memory (RAM) 34, and a display 36 all of which operate in conventional fashion so that only such details as are necessary to understand the invention, will be discussed herein. Display 36 contains a matrix of pixels the status of which are controlled by the contents of video RAM 36. Controller 32 functions to change the contents of RAM 34 into video on display 36. Such a system is known as a bit mapped graphics system. The display produces a background color and one or more foreground colors dependent whether the display is a monochrome or a color display and on the status of the pixels. A pixel is "on" or viewable by a user only when its foreground color is different from the background color. The pixel is "off" when it produces a background color. In accordance with the invention, the differences between two files being compared will be displayed to the user by setting those pixels representing the differences to a foreground color, i.e., turning such pixels on.
Windowing system 28 allows one or more windows to be displayed on display 36, in a known manner. In general, such system keeps track of the windows and their contents and provides the appropriate code to video RAM 34. Application program 30 interacts with the user and system 28 whereby program 30 will initiate the opening, loading, editing and closing of the windows used by it.
Referring to FIG. 2, in accordance with the general method of the invention, the user first determines or initiates the process of visually comparing two files A and B. Upon initiation, step 40 opens three windows W1, W2 and W3 which are of the same size but positioned at separate locations on the display. Step 42 allocates three bit planes BP1, BP2 and BP3 in the video RAM to the respective windows. Step 44 displays the windows W1-W3 on the display. Step 46 loads files A and B into bit planes BP1 and BP2 with the result that the contents of such files are displayed in windows W1 and W2. Step 48 then compares the contents of bit planes BP1 and BP2 on a pixel-by-pixel basis by exclusive or'ing. For each pair of pixels being compared, a corresponding pixel in BP3 is set off in step 50 to the background color when the two pixels are the same and set on to the foreground color when the two pixels are different. The loading or setting of bit plane BP3 displays such differences since points of similarity are converted to background color which is indistinguishable to the user. Step 52 allows the contents of the displayed files to be edited. Normally, only one file at a time would be edited and the editing would be done by moving the text about its respective window to bring the similar portions into corresponding alignment so as to eliminate them from view on the display. Only the differences would remain after similar portions have been aligned.
FIG. 3 illustrates such invention in apparatus form. Three windows W1-W3 are formed or displayed on display 36, the windows being of the same size but positioned at different location on the display. The contents of the windows are controlled by the contents of video RAM 34 which is mapped into three bit planes BP1-BP3 corresponding to windows W1-W3. An editor 38 loads files A and B into bit planes BP1 and BP2 and edits the contents thereof under control of keyboard 16 and mouse 22 as actuated by the user. Means 39 for comparing the contents of bit planes BP1 and BP2 are provided for comparing the respective pixel locations and exclusive or'ing each pair of corresponding pixels to set a corresponding pixel location in bit plane BP3 to reflect similarity or dissimilarity between the compared pair of pixels. Editor 38 and window compare means 39 are formed by the interaction of program 30 with processor 12 during execution of such program and represents the apparatus formed by software executing on hardware.
FIG. 4 illustrates how a screen 60 on display 36 might be designed and operated. The screen is set up by the windowing system and includes an action bar 62 along the top edge which displays various commands including LOAD and COMPARE in areas 64 and 66 of the action bar. The commands are selectable by moving the mouse to position the cursor in the area containing the desired command and then clicking the mouse. The three windows W1-W3 are located on the screen at different areas so as to clearly present their contents to the user. Window W1 has a title bar 68 at the top displaying the name of the file being displayed therein, and a scroll bar 70 along the right edge. The other windows have similar layouts except that the title bar of window W3 also includes two areas 76 and 78 containing commands ATTACH and SPECIFY.
To illustrate the invention, assume file A contains the sentence, THIS IS A TEXT FILE, and that file B contains the sentence, THIS IS A TENT FILE. Obviously, the differences are in the third letter of the fourth word of each sentence. At the start, the LOAD command in area 64 is clicked on twice to load the files into windows W1 and W2. The COMPARE command is then clicked on and this allows the respective files to be edited to bring their contents into respective alignment. As editing occurs, the differences are displayed on the screens. When aligned in the best manner, only the difference 74 appears on window W3. The difference is better understood from the blow up shown in the dotted circle in FIG. 4 wherein the difference lines 80, 82 and 84 are shown solid and would be visible to the user in window W3. The dashed line 86 represents the common cross bar of both the "X" and the "N". This difference is produced by exclusive or'ing the pixels representing the letters "X" and "N". Once the differences become apparent, the user can then select the commands ATTACH and SPECIFY. ATTACH ties all three windows together so that scrolling occurs in synchronism. SPECIFY allows the user to tell the system what to do with the difference such as delete it from file A, add it to file B, leave it, or put in something different.
A simple variation or change useful to some users would be to display the two files in different colors and to use the same colors in the difference window, so the user could discern which file contains the differences. It should be apparent to those skilled in the art that other changes can be made in the details and arrangements of steps and parts without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3568156 *||Aug 9, 1967||Mar 2, 1971||Bell Telephone Labor Inc||Text matching algorithm|
|US4121196 *||May 2, 1977||Oct 17, 1978||The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army||Data base update scheme|
|US4430725 *||May 18, 1981||Feb 7, 1984||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for displaying source and destination file headers for easy comparison of proposed header changes|
|US4524427 *||Aug 4, 1982||Jun 18, 1985||The University Of Bordeaux 1||Method for making comparisons between reference logical entities and logical entities proceeding from a file|
|US4525803 *||Aug 12, 1982||Jun 25, 1985||L'universite De Bordeaux 1||Method for controlling the comparison to be effected between reference logical entities and logical entities issuing from a file|
|US4555775 *||Oct 7, 1982||Nov 26, 1985||At&T Bell Laboratories||Dynamic generation and overlaying of graphic windows for multiple active program storage areas|
|US4641274 *||Aug 19, 1985||Feb 3, 1987||International Business Machines Corporation||Method for communicating changes made to text form a text processor to a remote host|
|US4710767 *||Jul 19, 1985||Dec 1, 1987||Sanders Associates, Inc.||Method and apparatus for displaying multiple images in overlapping windows|
|US4723209 *||Aug 30, 1984||Feb 2, 1988||International Business Machines Corp.||Flow attribute for text objects|
|US4723210 *||Aug 30, 1984||Feb 2, 1988||International Business Machines Corp.||Superblock structure in a multiple in a data editor|
|US4827330 *||Jul 20, 1987||May 2, 1989||Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc.||Automatic document image revision|
|US4864629 *||Dec 17, 1987||Sep 5, 1989||Schlumberger Technologies, Inc.||Image correlation system|
|US4958378 *||Apr 26, 1989||Sep 18, 1990||Sun Microsystems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for detecting changes in raster data|
|UST922008 *||Oct 18, 1973||May 7, 1974||Enter from step|
|1||Mano M., "Computer Systems Arichitecture", Prentice-Hall Inc., 1976, pp. 1-5.|
|2||*||Mano M., Computer Systems Arichitecture , Prentice Hall Inc., 1976, pp. 1 5.|
|3||S. Todd, "Serial File Merging Device", Aug. 1978, IBM TDB vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 1244, 1245.|
|4||*||S. Todd, Serial File Merging Device , Aug. 1978, IBM TDB vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 1244, 1245.|
|5||T. R. Hopper et al, "Program for Determining Text Updates", Nov. 1975, IBM TDB vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1792, 1793.|
|6||*||T. R. Hopper et al, Program for Determining Text Updates , Nov. 1975, IBM TDB vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 1792, 1793.|
|7||Word Perfect Corp., "Word Perfect for IBM Personal Computers", Apr. 1986, pp. 119, 120.|
|8||*||Word Perfect Corp., Word Perfect for IBM Personal Computers , Apr. 1986, pp. 119, 120.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5392390 *||Apr 10, 1992||Feb 21, 1995||Intellilink Corp.||Method for mapping, translating, and dynamically reconciling data between disparate computer platforms|
|US5666530 *||Dec 2, 1992||Sep 9, 1997||Compaq Computer Corporation||System for automatic synchronization of common file between portable computer and host computer via communication channel selected from a plurality of usable channels there between|
|US5666553 *||Jul 22, 1994||Sep 9, 1997||Puma Technology, Inc.||Method for mapping, translating, and dynamically reconciling data between disparate computer platforms|
|US5684990 *||Jan 11, 1995||Nov 4, 1997||Puma Technology, Inc.||Synchronization of disparate databases|
|US5692206 *||Nov 30, 1994||Nov 25, 1997||Taco Bell Corporation||Method and apparatus for automating the generation of a legal document|
|US5701423 *||Apr 7, 1994||Dec 23, 1997||Puma Technology, Inc.||Method for mapping, translating, and dynamically reconciling data between disparate computer platforms|
|US5832489 *||Oct 8, 1997||Nov 3, 1998||3 Com Corporation||Method and apparatus for synchronizing information on two different computer systems|
|US5884323 *||Oct 13, 1995||Mar 16, 1999||3Com Corporation||Extendible method and apparatus for synchronizing files on two different computer systems|
|US5928329 *||May 20, 1997||Jul 27, 1999||Compaq Computer Corporation||System for automatic synchronization of common file between portable computer and host computer via communication channel selected from a plurality of usable channels therebetween|
|US5933823 *||Mar 1, 1996||Aug 3, 1999||Ricoh Company Limited||Image database browsing and query using texture analysis|
|US5943676 *||Nov 13, 1996||Aug 24, 1999||Puma Technology, Inc.||Synchronization of recurring records in incompatible databases|
|US6000000 *||May 4, 1998||Dec 7, 1999||3Com Corporation||Extendible method and apparatus for synchronizing multiple files on two different computer systems|
|US6006274 *||Jan 30, 1997||Dec 21, 1999||3Com Corporation||Method and apparatus using a pass through personal computer connected to both a local communication link and a computer network for indentifying and synchronizing a preferred computer with a portable computer|
|US6034686 *||Mar 9, 1998||Mar 7, 2000||3Com Corporation||Collapsing event display for small screen computer|
|US6044381 *||Sep 11, 1997||Mar 28, 2000||Puma Technology, Inc.||Using distributed history files in synchronizing databases|
|US6141664 *||Nov 13, 1996||Oct 31, 2000||Puma Technology, Inc.||Synchronization of databases with date range|
|US6205448||Jan 30, 1998||Mar 20, 2001||3Com Corporation||Method and apparatus of synchronizing two computer systems supporting multiple synchronization techniques|
|US6212529||Mar 5, 1998||Apr 3, 2001||Puma Technology, Inc.||Synchronization of databases using filters|
|US6223187||Nov 30, 1999||Apr 24, 2001||Puma Technology, Inc.||Distributed synchronization of databases|
|US6243705||Aug 12, 1998||Jun 5, 2001||Palm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronizing information on two different computer systems|
|US6253326||May 29, 1998||Jun 26, 2001||Palm, Inc.||Method and system for secure communications|
|US6317797||Oct 20, 1998||Nov 13, 2001||Compaq Computer Corporation||System for automatic synchronization of common file between portable computer and host computer via communication channel established with user approval of charge to be incurred|
|US6330568||Nov 5, 1997||Dec 11, 2001||Pumatech, Inc.||Synchronization of databases|
|US6330618||May 25, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Palm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronizing a portable computer system with a desktop computer system|
|US6360272||May 28, 1999||Mar 19, 2002||Palm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for maintaining a unified view of multiple mailboxes|
|US6389572||May 28, 1999||May 14, 2002||Palm, Inc.||Method of extracting bits from modulated waveforms|
|US6397259||May 29, 1998||May 28, 2002||Palm, Inc.||Method, system and apparatus for packet minimized communications|
|US6401112||Jan 29, 1997||Jun 4, 2002||Palm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronizing an Email client on a portable computer system with an Email client on a desktop computer|
|US6405218||Oct 9, 1998||Jun 11, 2002||Pumatech, Inc.||Synchronizing databases|
|US6505215 *||Jun 8, 2000||Jan 7, 2003||Palm, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronization of two computer systems supporting multiple synchronization techniques by using synchronization transport modules|
|US6532480||Apr 11, 2000||Mar 11, 2003||Pumatech, Inc.||Synchronization of databases with record sanitizing and intelligent comparison|
|US6560620||Aug 3, 1999||May 6, 2003||Aplix Research, Inc.||Hierarchical document comparison system and method|
|US6658626 *||Sep 3, 1999||Dec 2, 2003||The Regents Of The University Of California||User interface for displaying document comparison information|
|US6704807 *||Apr 28, 2000||Mar 9, 2004||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US6728786||Sep 26, 2001||Apr 27, 2004||Palmsource, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronizing a portable computer system with a desktop computer system|
|US6799190||Apr 11, 2002||Sep 28, 2004||Intellisync Corporation||Synchronizing databases|
|US6925477||Mar 31, 1998||Aug 2, 2005||Intellisync Corporation||Transferring records between two databases|
|US6934740||Sep 19, 2000||Aug 23, 2005||3Com Corporation||Method and apparatus for sharing common data objects among multiple applications in a client device|
|US6978420||Feb 12, 2001||Dec 20, 2005||Aplix Research, Inc.||Hierarchical document cross-reference system and method|
|US6981225 *||Jan 31, 2000||Dec 27, 2005||Intel Corporation||Indicating the differences between Internet web pages|
|US6993561||Jan 10, 2002||Jan 31, 2006||Palmsource, Inc.||Method and apparatus for maintaining a unified view of multiple mailboxes|
|US7007003||Dec 4, 1998||Feb 28, 2006||Intellisync Corporation||Notification protocol for establishing synchronization mode for use in synchronizing databases|
|US7013315||Jan 9, 2003||Mar 14, 2006||Intellisync Corporation||Synchronization of databases with record sanitizing and intelligent comparison|
|US7025209||May 29, 1998||Apr 11, 2006||Palmsource, Inc.||Method and apparatus for wireless internet access|
|US7206815||Jan 16, 2004||Apr 17, 2007||Palmsource Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronizing an email client on a portable computer system with an email client on a desktop computer|
|US7209911||Feb 2, 2001||Apr 24, 2007||Intellisync Corporation||Synchronization of databases using filters|
|US7228318 *||May 4, 2005||Jun 5, 2007||Nec Corporation||System and methods for invalidation to enable caching of dynamically generated content|
|US7237202||May 11, 2004||Jun 26, 2007||Cynthia Joanne Gage||Multiple document viewing apparatus and user interface|
|US7260773||Mar 17, 2003||Aug 21, 2007||Uri Zernik||Device system and method for determining document similarities and differences|
|US7266586||Nov 4, 2005||Sep 4, 2007||Access Systems Americas, Inc.||Method and apparatus for maintaining a unified view of multiple mailboxes|
|US7299240 *||Jul 6, 2004||Nov 20, 2007||Intellisync Corporation||Method for translating computer data from one record structure to another|
|US7302446||Sep 20, 2004||Nov 27, 2007||Intellisync Corporation||Synchronizing databases|
|US7437485||Dec 24, 2003||Oct 14, 2008||Access Systems Americas, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronization of two computer systems|
|US7472067||Nov 11, 2004||Dec 30, 2008||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US7661062 *||Sep 20, 2000||Feb 9, 2010||Business Objects Americas||System and method of analyzing an HTML document for changes such that the changed areas can be displayed with the original formatting intact|
|US7802266||Nov 11, 2004||Sep 21, 2010||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US7941399||Nov 9, 2007||May 10, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Collaborative authoring|
|US8028229||Dec 6, 2007||Sep 27, 2011||Microsoft Corporation||Document merge|
|US8108785 *||Jan 9, 2006||Jan 31, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Supporting user multi-tasking with clipping lists|
|US8244036||Jan 24, 2007||Aug 14, 2012||Bluebeam Software, Inc.||Method for emphasizing differences in graphical appearance between an original document and a modified document with annotations|
|US8301588||Mar 7, 2008||Oct 30, 2012||Microsoft Corporation||Data storage for file updates|
|US8321197||Oct 17, 2007||Nov 27, 2012||Teresa Ruth Gaudet||Method and process for performing category-based analysis, evaluation, and prescriptive practice creation upon stenographically written and voice-written text files|
|US8346768||Apr 30, 2009||Jan 1, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Fast merge support for legacy documents|
|US8352418||Apr 4, 2011||Jan 8, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Client side locking|
|US8352870||Apr 28, 2008||Jan 8, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Conflict resolution|
|US8417666||Jun 25, 2008||Apr 9, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Structured coauthoring|
|US8429753||May 8, 2008||Apr 23, 2013||Microsoft Corporation||Controlling access to documents using file locks|
|US8473853||May 14, 2007||Jun 25, 2013||S.F. Ip Properties 56 Llc||Multiple document viewing apparatus and user interface|
|US8509535 *||Jun 28, 2012||Aug 13, 2013||Bluebeam Software, Inc.||Method for emphasizing differences in graphical appearance between an original document and a modified document with annotations including outer and inner boundaries|
|US8805957||Feb 3, 2012||Aug 12, 2014||Access Co., Ltd.||Method and apparatus for communications over low bandwidth communications networks|
|US8825594||May 8, 2008||Sep 2, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Caching infrastructure|
|US8825758||Dec 14, 2007||Sep 2, 2014||Microsoft Corporation||Collaborative authoring modes|
|US8990150||Jul 1, 2012||Mar 24, 2015||Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc||Collaborative authoring|
|US20020059391 *||Jan 10, 2002||May 16, 2002||Lincke Scott D.||Method and apparatus for maintaining a unified view of multiple mailboxes|
|US20050066340 *||Nov 11, 2004||Mar 24, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US20050097577 *||Nov 11, 2004||May 5, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US20050102687 *||Nov 11, 2004||May 12, 2005||Microsoft Corporation||Application program interfaces and structures in a resource limited operating system|
|US20050192995 *||May 4, 2005||Sep 1, 2005||Nec Corporation||System and methods for invalidation to enable caching of dynamically generated content|
|US20120299944 *||Jun 28, 2012||Nov 29, 2012||Brian Hartmann||Method for emphasizing differences in graphical appearance between an original document and a modified document with annotations including outer and inner boundaries|
|US20140006922 *||Apr 11, 2008||Jan 2, 2014||Alex Smith||Comparison output of electronic documents|
|USRE43571||Aug 24, 2001||Aug 7, 2012||Intellisync Corporation||Synchronization of recurring records in incompatible databases|
|EP2106594A1 *||Jan 17, 2008||Oct 7, 2009||Bluebeam Software, Inc.||Method for emphasizing differences in graphical appearance between an original document and a modified document with annotations|
|WO2008091526A1||Jan 17, 2008||Jul 31, 2008||Bluebeam Software Inc||Method for emphasizing differences in graphical appearance between an original document and a modified document with annotations|
|U.S. Classification||715/803, 715/784, 715/234|
|International Classification||G06F17/22, G06F7/02, G06F17/27|
|Cooperative Classification||G06F17/2211, G06F7/02|
|European Classification||G06F7/02, G06F17/22D|
|Jan 2, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 21, 2000||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Aug 27, 2000||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Oct 31, 2000||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20000825