|Publication number||US5189493 A|
|Application number||US 07/775,883|
|Publication date||Feb 23, 1993|
|Filing date||Oct 21, 1991|
|Priority date||Nov 2, 1990|
|Also published as||DE4136002A1|
|Publication number||07775883, 775883, US 5189493 A, US 5189493A, US-A-5189493, US5189493 A, US5189493A|
|Inventors||Kevin G. Harding|
|Original Assignee||Industrial Technology Institute|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (28), Classifications (6), Legal Events (7)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application Ser. No. 07/608,571 filed on Nov. 2, 1990, entitled: "Moire Contouring Camera", now U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,549.
This invention relates to an optical device for evaluating the contours of a workpiece and particularly to one which uses moire principles and enabling phase shifting or field shifting analysis.
Optical contouring systems using moire principles have been in use for some time. In one type of such system, a known periodic pattern such as a grating is projected onto the surface to be evaluated and the image of the grating as taken from a direction askew from the illumination direction as deformed by the surface is analyzed to determine the profile. The deformed grating image is often super-imposed upon a matched reference grating which amplifies the grating deformation and results in the well-known moire fringe patterns. Such fringe patterns are easily interpreted as surface contours by an observer or through automated means. The resulting fringe patterns are lines of equal depth change, which are independent of object orientation, rigid body displacement, color or marking on the part. The typical approach for providing the moire pattern is to use separate projection and reference gratings which are positioned in the optical paths of the illumination and viewing system, respectively. Similarly, separate primary lenses are used for projecting the focused image of the grating onto the object and for focusing that image onto an image detector or eyepiece.
Although present moire contouring systems operate satisfactorily, the use of separate gratings and primary lenses produces a number of disadvantages. For example, slight differences in the magnification of two gratings on the object and detector produce changes in the moire interference pattern which are independent of workpiece contour. When such magnification errors exist, the differences produce a fringe pattern due to a displacement of portions of the projected and reference gratings, even when the workpiece is truly flat. Similarly, slight differences in focus and/or alignment of the two primary lenses cause distortion of the image. The use of separate primary lenses and gratings also produces a stability problem, since even minute relative motion between these elements can cause image distortion. Even when purchasing expensive optics, it is difficult to obtain two lenses which are preciously matched in terms of their magnification and focal length. In addition to the above mentioned disadvantages, the requirement of separate lens and grating elements further increases the cost of the imaging device since these elements must be separately purchased, mounted, installed and aligned.
The present invention is related to a moire contouring imaging device or camera which overcomes the above mentioned disadvantages of prior art designs. The advantages of the present invention are achieved primarily through the use of a single optical grating and primary lens for both the projection and viewing optical paths for improved stability and optical performance. The optical system in accordance with this invention features the illumination beam light path being inclined with respect to the viewing light path, both of which pass through a common grating and primary lens. Due to the inclination of the two beams, one of the beams must be redirected so that they will converge upon a focal plane where the object to be evaluated is placed. In accordance with the embodiment of this invention shown in the appended drawings, the illumination optical path is reflected by a folding mirror to cause it to converge with the viewing optical path upon the object being evaluated. The invention further incorporated features to enhance its simplicity, durability and definition of produced images by reducing the problems of stray light within the device.
The moire contouring imaging device of this invention is also readily adapted for providing either phase shift or field shift type moire analysis. If the grating for the illumination and viewing optical paths of the device of this invention is shifted, a phase shift is produced in which the moire image is presented at multiple phases of position across the viewing field. The effect is to cause the moire interference pattern to scan across the field of view. Field shift analysis is provided through providing a translation mechanism which physically moves the grating.
The moire imaging device of this invention is also readily adapted for use in providing field shift moire analysis. This effect is caused by translating the folding mirror perpendicular to the mirror surface through the use of a linear translation device. In field shifting, both the lens and projection grating appear to be moved together and thus the projection point of either the illumination beam path or viewing beam path changes. Like phase shifting, field shifting provides the potential of providing absolute measurement of surface contour. In assignees co-pending application Ser. No. 564,104 filed on Aug. 8, 1990 entitled "Field Shift Moire System", now U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,549 a process for field shift moire evaluation is described. This related application is hereby incorporated by reference.
Additional benefits and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which this invention relates from the subsequent description of the preferred embodiments and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a pictorial view of a moire contouring device in accordance with a first embodiment of this invention shown with a remote light source and workpiece being characterized.
FIG. 2 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of the device of FIG. 1 showing the internal components of the moire contouring system according to this invention.
FIG. 3 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of a moire contouring device in accordance with a second embodiment of this invention incorporating means for translating either the folding mirror and grating.
FIG. 4 is a partial pictorial view showing in greater detail the mechanism used to translate the grating of the device in FIG. 3.
A moire contouring camera is shown in FIG. 1 and is generally designated there by reference number 10. Camera 10 is shown in FIG. 1 being used to characterize the surface configuration of a arbitrary workpiece 12. As is shown, the device 10 comprises an elongated housing 14 having a viewing end 16 with the opposite end mounting a video camera 18. The light source for the device is mounted in a separate housing 20 having on/off switch 22 and intensity control 24. The use of a remote light source enables the optical system to be shorter in overall length. An internal light source within housing 20 is coupled to a fiber optic cable 26 which provides for illuminating the workpiece 12, as better described in detail below. It is contemplated that a light source internal within 14 could also be used, for example in the form of a high intensity LED. Signals related to the image being detected are coupled to an appropriate video monitor or other image processing device (not shown) via cable 28. A shell or frame 30 can be provided to stabilize the device in use.
Now with reference to FIG. 2, the internal elements comprising moire contouring camera 10 will be described in detail. Camera housing 14 is a generally elongated tubular structure open at the end defining viewing end 16. Fiber bracket 36 mounts cable 26 to the side of housing 14 to inject light into the device. Mounting platform 38 is rigidly affixed within housing 14 for mounting various optical elements. Right angle prism 40 is mounted onto light shield 42 which is in turn rigidly affixed to mounting platform 38. In addition, a pair of lenses including collminating lens 44 and condenser lens 46 are placed in the illumination light path such that, as light is injected into housing 34 and reflected at prism 40, the beam passes through lens 44 and condenser lens 46. Collimating lens 44 is provided to enhance the transfer of light into the device, and condenser lens 46 recreates an image of the light source at the effective aperture of primary lens 52. As is evident from the figure, the illumination light path designated by ray 48 is inclined with respect to the optical axis 49 of the system. Grating 50 is also fastened to mounting platform 38 at a position such that the illumination light path 48 passes through grating 50. As the illumination light beam advances, it passes through primary lens 52 and then strikes mirror 54 and is reflected back towards the optical axis 49. The optical elements within the illumination light path 48 cause an image of the grating 50 to be focused upon an image plane 56 at which the workpiece 12 to be evaluated is placed during evaluation.
The light beam reflected from a workpiece 12 at the image plane 56 travels along the viewing optical path 58 which is coincident or nearly coincident with the system's optical axis 49. This light path passes again through primary lens 52 and thereafter through grating 50 and field lens 60 which images the aperture of the primary lens onto video camera lens 62. Extension ring 68 is provided for mounting video camera lens 62. Finally, the viewing light path passes through secondary lens 62 and becomes focused upon the image plane of video camera 18. As shown in the figures, primary lens 52 is conveniently mounted to lens mount 64 which is supported relative to mounting platform 38 via dowels 66.
In moire evaluation, the sensitivity of the generated moire fringe patterns is a function of a number of factors, including the angle of inclination between the illumination and viewing optical paths 48 and 58 designated in FIG. 2 as angle alpha which is also referred to as the occlusion angle. In addition, this sensitivity is a function of grating spacing on the workpiece. In accordance with well known moire contouring principles, one method of decreasing fringe spacing and, therefore, contour sensitivity is to increase the occlusion angle. The design of moire contouring camera 10 in accordance with this invention employs an occlusion angle of about 20 degrees, which was deemed as sufficiently great to provide a desired level of fringe spacing while allowing the use of a conventional off-the-shelf lens for primary lens 52 having a field angle of approximately 60 degrees. To provide greater occlusion angles, it is likely that specialized lens would have to be provided for primary lens 52 having extreme wide angle capabilities.
It is noteworthy that the optical axes of both the illumination and viewing light paths are both coincident or nearly coincident with this design along longitudinal axis 49 and, therefore, a precise coincidence in focus can be provided through using a common primary lens 52. In order to avoid image edge distortions, the inventor has found that the operation of the system is highly sensitive to the orientation of the plane of mirror 54 which must be set very close to being parallel to the optical axes of the system.
The moire contouring camera 10 in accordance with this invention includes an enhancement intended to reduce the effects of unwanted reflected stray light within housing 14 from impairing the image quality as detected by video camera 18. With reference to FIG. 2, it is apparent that light along illumination light path 48, upon striking primary lens 52 could cause first surface reflections of the light source back onto field lens 60 and thereafter to video camera 18. Although presently available anti-reflection coatings for lenses are highly efficient, they still permit a level of reflection of on the order of one-half to one percent of the incidence light. Although this intensity would appear minute and negligible, in operation of camera 10, a much smaller percent of the illumination light presented onto the workpiece 12 is actually reflected back through the system and, therefore, this level of unwanted reflection from the rear surface of primary lens 52 can constitute a large loss of definition and contrast. As a means of reducing the effects of such unwanted stray reflected light, the condenser lens 46 and the illumination light path 48 are angled from the plane represented by the sheet of FIG. 2, such that the illumination optical path 48 and viewing optical path 58 do not lie in a common plane. With this slight off-axis orientation, the image of the light source reflecting off the rear surface of primary lens 52 is cast upon field lens 60 at a position outside of its central axis. The image field of field lens 60 is inside the circular zone of the light source reflection off primary lens 52, and, therefore, the reflected light is not seen at video camera 18.
As a means of supplementing the detailed description of this invention the following table is provided which lists specific information concerning the significant optical elements of a preferred embodiment of this invention.
______________________________________ELEMENT ELEMENTNUMBER NAME DESCRIPTION______________________________________14 Housing 4" 1 D PVC40 Prism 10 × 10 × 14 mm 90 degrees #B32,544/Edmund Scientific44 Collimating 12 mm dia. 36 mm focal length Lens #B32,887/Edmund Scientific46 Condenser Lens 12 mm dia. 36 mm focal length #B32.887/Edmund Scientific50 Grating 300 lines per inch #B32,544/Edmund Scientific52 Primary Lens 40 mm - f/4 #77.040.01/Rodenstock54 Mirror 38 × 150 mm #B32,442/Edmund Scientific60 Field Lens #B32,887/Edmund Scientific62 Secondary Lens 50 mm F/1.4 Norman Camera68 Lens Mount #2712 Norman Camera______________________________________
As an alternate embodiment of this invention, video camera 18 could be substituted with an eyepiece to enable client viewing through the device.
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate a second embodiment of an imaging device of this invention which is generally designated by reference number 80. A number of the components of moire contouring camera 80 are identical to those of the prior embodiment and are, therefore, identified like reference numbers. Moire contouring camera 80 differs from the prior embodiment in that it is adapted for either field shift or phase shift evaluation.
In a typical projection moire system, if the projection grating or lens moves with respect to the viewing lens or sub-master grating, errors are created that can be random in nature. However, since only one physical grating 50 is used in the moire contouring camera of this invention, movement of a master and sub-master grating relative to each other is not possible, however, they can move together. In some instances it may be desirable to move grating 50 of moire contouring camera 80 to provide what is known as phase shifting analysis. Phase shift analysis requires the presentation of the moire image at multiple phases of position across the viewing field. The effect is to cause the moire pattern to scan across the field of view. Phase shift analysis is particularly adapted for automated analysis of the resulting moire pattern.
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate the mechanism used for causing displacement of the grating 50 to provide phase shifting. For this embodiment, a modified mounting platform 82 is provided which accommodates translation of grating 50. A translation actuator 84 which could be in the form of a piezoelectric element, solenoid or other precision controllable translation element is connected to grating 50 through control rod 86. An actuator controller 88 is illustrated in diagrammatic fashion in FIG. 4. The direction of translation of grating 50 is perpendicular to the grid lines formed by the grating or at least at n angle with respect to the grid lines. When providing phase shift operation, a smaller movement of the grating 50 can be used with the moire contouring camera 80 of this invention that would be needed in a conventional projection moire system to produce a given phase shift of a moire pattern. In imaging device 80, grating 50 is moved by one-half of the desired change in the position of the grating phase which is a fraction of the period of the grating. Translation of grating 50 through actuator 84 can be discontinuous in that the grating is stopped at plural discrete positions or moved in a continuous fashion for visual or automated analysis of the moving fringe patterns.
Moire contouring camera 80 further incorporates a mechanism for moving folding mirror 54 which provides what is referred to as moire field shifting. Although features for moving mirror 54 and grating 50 are shown in a single imaging device 80 they can, and likely would, be incorporated in separate devices. However, for the sake of illustration, both of these features are illustrated in moire contouring device 80.
In field shifting, the perspective of the viewing or illumination optical paths are moved, causing a change in occlusion angle. In moire contouring camera 80 this is achieved by moving folding mirror 54 in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the reflective mirror surface. This translation is achieved through the use of an actuator 92 which may be comprised of a piezoelectric crystal, or other precision linear translation device. Field shifting enables analysis by the usual tools and has the potential for providing absolute measurements of surface contour. The actual field shifting of moire contouring camera 80 will be twice that of the movement of mirror 54. In the case where the projected grating image is enlarged relative to grating 50, the motion of mirror 54 will be larger by the magnification of the system, then the motion required of the grating for the same phase shift. The larger motion of mirror 54 can make the phase shift position accuracy less affected by small errors in movement of the mirror. Actuator controller 94 is shown diagrammatically for controlling the translation of folding mirror 54. As in the case of translation of grating 50, the movement of folding mirror 54 can either be discontinuous or continuous.
While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiments of the present invention, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible of modification, variation and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the accompanying claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3614237 *||Jan 21, 1969||Oct 19, 1971||Lockheed Aircraft Corp||Method and apparatus for contour measurement|
|US4212073 *||Dec 13, 1978||Jul 8, 1980||Balasubramanian N||Method and system for surface contouring|
|US4564295 *||Mar 7, 1983||Jan 14, 1986||New York Institute Of Technology||Apparatus and method for projection moire topography|
|US4794550 *||Oct 15, 1986||Dec 27, 1988||Eastman Kodak Company||Extended-range moire contouring|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5636025 *||Jun 17, 1994||Jun 3, 1997||Medar, Inc.||System for optically measuring the surface contour of a part using more fringe techniques|
|US6040910 *||May 20, 1998||Mar 21, 2000||The Penn State Research Foundation||Optical phase-shift triangulation technique (PST) for non-contact surface profiling|
|US6084712 *||Nov 3, 1998||Jul 4, 2000||Dynamic Measurement And Inspection,Llc||Three dimensional imaging using a refractive optic design|
|US6122062 *||May 3, 1999||Sep 19, 2000||Fanuc Robotics North America, Inc.||3-D camera|
|US6252623||May 15, 1998||Jun 26, 2001||3Dmetrics, Incorporated||Three dimensional imaging system|
|US6456384 *||Nov 9, 2000||Sep 24, 2002||Tropel Corporation||Moiré interferometer with overlapping illumination and imaging systems|
|US6466843 *||Oct 16, 2001||Oct 15, 2002||General Electric Company||Method and apparatus for lifting objects|
|US6873340||Dec 16, 2002||Mar 29, 2005||Visimatix, Inc.||Method and apparatus for an automated reference indicator system for photographic and video images|
|US7256897 *||Jan 21, 2004||Aug 14, 2007||Sony Corporation||Three-dimensional measurement apparatus and three-dimensional measurement method|
|US7489408||Nov 15, 2005||Feb 10, 2009||General Electric Company||Optical edge break gage|
|US7499830||Nov 15, 2005||Mar 3, 2009||General Electric Company||Computer-implemented techniques and system for characterizing geometric parameters of an edge break in a machined part|
|US7612869||Nov 3, 2009||California Institute Of Technology||Aperture coded camera for three dimensional imaging|
|US7612870||Sep 14, 2006||Nov 3, 2009||California Institute Of Technology||Single-lens aperture-coded camera for three dimensional imaging in small volumes|
|US7852492||Dec 14, 2010||Nectar Imaging S.R.L.||Device for tomographic scanning objects|
|US8045181||May 21, 2009||Oct 25, 2011||General Electric Company||Inspection system and method with multi-image phase shift analysis|
|US9175948 *||Nov 4, 2013||Nov 3, 2015||Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh||Optical module with a measuring device|
|US20020163573 *||Apr 11, 2001||Nov 7, 2002||Bieman Leonard H.||Imaging system|
|US20040150837 *||Jan 21, 2004||Aug 5, 2004||Toshinobu Sugiyama||Three-dimensional measurement apparatus and three-dimensional measurement method|
|US20060072123 *||Nov 18, 2005||Apr 6, 2006||Wilson John E||Methods and apparatus for making images including depth information|
|US20060209193 *||Feb 28, 2006||Sep 21, 2006||Francisco Pereira||Aperture coded camera for three dimensional imaging|
|US20070109558 *||Nov 15, 2005||May 17, 2007||Harding Kevin G||Optical edge break gage|
|US20070112543 *||Nov 15, 2005||May 17, 2007||Harding Kevin G||Computer-implemented techniques and system for characterizing geometric parameters of an edge break in a machined part|
|US20070195162 *||Sep 14, 2006||Aug 23, 2007||Graff Emilio C||Single-lens aperture-coded camera for three dimensional imaging in small volumes|
|US20090103103 *||Oct 17, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Mht Optic Research Ag||Device for tomographic scanning objects|
|US20100296104 *||May 21, 2009||Nov 25, 2010||General Electric Company||Inspection system and method with multi-image phase shift analysis|
|US20140125995 *||Nov 4, 2013||May 8, 2014||Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh||Optical module with a measuring device|
|DE4325542A1 *||Jul 29, 1993||Feb 2, 1995||Fraunhofer Ges Forschung||Method for three-dimensional measurement of inaccessible cavities|
|WO2007065153A2 *||Dec 1, 2006||Jun 7, 2007||Texas Instruments Incorporated||Illumination system with integral modulation technique|
|U.S. Classification||356/605, 250/237.00G|
|International Classification||G01B11/25, G02B27/60|
|Oct 21, 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE, MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:HARDING, KEVIN G.;REEL/FRAME:005878/0645
Effective date: 19911011
|Nov 30, 1993||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Aug 12, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Apr 13, 2000||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION, LLC, OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE;REEL/FRAME:010710/0482
Effective date: 19991201
|Aug 23, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Aug 23, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Jan 31, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION, LLC;REEL/FRAME:017223/0112
Effective date: 20051101