|Publication number||US5204310 A|
|Application number||US 07/839,597|
|Publication date||Apr 20, 1993|
|Filing date||Feb 21, 1992|
|Priority date||Feb 21, 1992|
|Also published as||CA2089925A1, CA2089925C, DE69320385D1, DE69320385T2, EP0557208A1, EP0557208B1|
|Publication number||07839597, 839597, US 5204310 A, US 5204310A, US-A-5204310, US5204310 A, US5204310A|
|Inventors||Edward D. Tolles, Mitchell S. Dimitri, Charles C. Matthews|
|Original Assignee||Westvaco Corporation|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (81), Classifications (14), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to activated carbon and methods for preparing same. Particularly, this invention relates to new carbons useful in vapor adsorption and methods for their production. More particularly, this invention relates to activated carbon derived from lignocellulosic material prepared by chemical activation and shaping to produce carbon of high density and high activity.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Activated carbon is a microcrystalline, nongraphitic form of carbon which has been processed to increase internal porosity. Activated carbons are characterized by a large specific surface area typically in the range of 500-2500 m2 /g, which permits its industrial use in the purification of liquids and gases by the adsorption of gases and vapors from gases and of dissolved or dispersed substances from liquids. Commercial grades of activated carbon are designated as either gas-phase or liquid-phase adsorbents. Liquid-phase carbons generally may be powdered, granular, or shaped; gas-phase, vapor-adsorbent carbons are hard granules or hard, relatively dust-free shaped pellets.
Generally, the larger the surface area of the activated carbon, the greater its adsorption capacity. The available surface area of activated carbon is dependent on its pore volume. Since the surface area per unit volume decreases as individual pore size increases, large surface area is maximized by maximizing the number of pores of very small dimensions and/or minimizing the number of pores of very large dimensions. Pore sizes are defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry as micropores (pore width<1.8 nm), mesopores (pore width=1.8-50 nm), and macropores (pore width>50 nm). Micropores and mesopores contribute to the adsorptive capacity of the activated carbon; whereas, the macropores reduce the density and can be detrimental to the adsorbant effectiveness of the activated carbon, on a carbon volume basis. The adsorption capacity and rate of adsorption depend to a large extent upon the internal surface area and pore size distribution. Conventional chemically activated lignocellulose-based carbons generally exhibit macroporosity (macropore volume) of greater than 20% of the carbon particle total volume. Gas-phase activated carbon macroporosity of less than 20% of the carbon particle volume would be desirable. Likewise, a high percentage of mesoporosity (i.e., above 50% of total particle volume) is desirable.
Commercial activated carbon has been made from material of plant origin, such as hardwood and softwood, corncobs, kelp, coffee beans, rice hulls, fruit pits, nutshells, and wastes such as bagasse and lignin. Activated carbon also has been made from peat, lignite, soft and hard coals, tars and pitches, asphalt, petroleum residues, and carbon black.
Activation of the raw material is accomplished by one of two distinct processes: 1) chemical activation, or (2) thermal activation. The effective porosity of activated carbon produced by thermal activation is the result of gasification of the carbon at relatively high temperatures (after an initial carbonization of the raw material), but the porosity of chemically activated products generally is created by chemical dehydration/condensation reactions occurring at significantly lower temperatures.
Chemical activation typically is carried out commercially in a single kiln. The carbonaceous material precursor is impregnated with a chemical activation agent, and the blend is heated to a temperature of 450°-700° C. Chemical activation agents reduce the formation of tar and other by-products, thereby increasing yield.
A "hard active carbon of high adsorptive power in the shaped or moulded state" is taught in U.S. Pat. No. 2,083,303 to be prepared by impregnating pulverized organic raw material, such as "sawdust, peat, lignite or the like" with "known activating agents, such as zinc chloride or phosphoric acid" and heated to 100°-200° C. for one to one and a half hours producing a partially carbonized state wherein the material is somewhat plastic. Without reducing the temperature, the material is molded under pressure to a desired shape. The shaped material then is activated in a rotary activating retort and brought to a temperature of 450°-600° C. for about four hours.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 2,508,474 teaches a gas mask activated carbon to be prepared by impregnating low density cellulosic material, such as finely divided wood in the form of wood shavings or sawdust, with concentrated zinc chloride, and heating to 120°-145° C. while agitating for not less than fifty minutes. The reacted mass then is compacted into "forms of appreciable size;" said forms are dried at 160°-300° C.; the dried forms are crushed into granular particles; the granules are calcined at 675°-725° C.; and, after leaching out of the particles a greater portion of residual zinc chloride, recalcining the activated carbon product at 1000°-1100° C. for at least thirty minutes.
These representative techniques have produced activated carbon of adequate activity and density for many gas-phase applications, especially for purification and separation of gases as in industrial gas streams, in odor removal in air conditioning systems, and in gas masks. However, older technology gas-phase activated carbons have not proven entirely satisfactory in some applications for recovery (not just removal) of organic vapors which involves adsorption onto the carbon surface followed by desorption from the carbon for recapture. In fact, due to environmental concerns and regulatory mandates, one of the largest single applications for gas-phase carbon is in gasoline vapor emission control canisters on automobiles. Evaporative emissions vented from both fuel tank and carburetor are captured by activated carbon.
Fuel vapors, vented when the fuel tank or carburetor is heated, are captured in canisters generally containing from 0.5 to 2 liters of activated carbon. Regeneration of the carbon is accomplished by using intake manifold vacuum to draw air through the canister. The air carries desorbed vapor into the engine where it is burned during normal operation. An evaporative emission control carbon should have suitable hardness, a high vapor working capacity, and a high saturation capacity. The working capacity of a carbon for gasoline vapor is determined by the adsorption-desorption temperature differential, by the volume of purge air which flows through the carbon canister, and by the extent to which irreversibly adsorbed, high molecular weight gasoline components accumulate on the carbon.
Because of various economic considerations and space limitations in placing the carbon canister on-board a vehicle, this particular application of granular or shaped activated carbon requires higher activity and higher density properties than typically produced by the older technology noted. One method to control product density is taught by published European Patent Application 0 423 967 A2. The applicants note "a number of problems inherent in the use of wood as a raw material to produce directly a chemically activated pelletised form," claiming it to be "impossible to produce a high density activated carbon from a wood flour material" for lack of sufficient natural binding agent. An improved product (of substantially increased density) is claimed by use of, as a starting material, a "young carbonaceous vegetable product" having a "high concentration of natural binding agent." Such materials include nut shell, fruit stone and kernel, and in particular olive stone, almond shell, and coconut shell.
Also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,039,651 teaches densification of activated carbon product from cellulose materials including coconut shells, wood chips, and sawdust by pressing after initially heating to a relatively low temperature, followed by extrusion and calcination. Yet, with this improved processing the patentees could produce only carbons that were measured to have a volumetric working capacity (in terms of butane working capacity, or BWC) of up to 12.3 g/100 cm3, although BWC values up to 15 g/100 cm3 are claimed.
These prior art gas-phase carbons may have been satisfactory for limited volumes of vapors emitted from the carburetor and fuel tank. Because of impending environmental regulations requiring capture of greater amounts of fuel vapor emissions, it is anticipated that the volume of these additional vapors, combined with the space limitations and economic considerations which limit expansion of the size of canister systems, will require activated carbons with higher densities, higher activities, and higher volumetric working capacities than disclosed by the prior art (e.g., BWC>15 g/100 cm3).
Therefore, it is an object of this invention to provide activated carbons of high activity and relatively high density suitable for solvent and vapor capture and recovery. It is a further object of this invention to provide chemical activation processes for producing higher activity gas-phase activated carbons without sacrificing density. Also, it is an object of this invention to employ the high density, high activity chemically activated carbon for vehicle emission control.
The above objects of the invention are achieved, unexpectedly, by the chemical activation of a carbonaceous material, preferably lignocellulosic material, with a chemical activation agent in a manner to produce a plastic intermediate product which is densified to effectively minimize the macropore structure of the activated carbonaceous material. Densification is followed by increasing the temperature of the shaped product at a controlled rate to from about 425° C. to about 650° C.
Alternative novel processes of the invention may be employed depending on the starting material employed and level of activation desired. Certain processes may be controlled to regulate the degree of macroporosity preservation to produce either carbons more suitable for liquid phase applications or carbons more suitable for gas-phase applications. The novel high activity, high density gas-phase activated carbons produced are characterized by butane working capacities from above 15 to about 25 g/100 cm3, preferably from about 17 to about 25 g/100 cm3, and more preferably from about 19 to about 25 g/100 cm3, a butane activity of from about 50 to about 80 g/100 g, preferably from about 60 to about 80 g/100 g, and more preferably from about 70 to about 80 g/100 g, and a density of from about 0.25 to about 0.40 g/cm3, preferably from about 0.27 to about 0.40 g/cm3, more preferably from about 0.30 to about 0.40 g/cm3.
Preferably, such an activated carbon material also would exhibit a mesopore content of greater than about 50%, preferably greater than about 60%, and more preferably greater than about 70%, based on the total particle volume, and a macropore content of less than 20%, preferably less than 18%, and more preferably less than 15%, based on the total particle volume.
The raw material precursor in the invention chemical activation may be any of the carbonaceous material of plant or mineral origin earlier recited. Preferred precursors primarily are lignocellulosic materials of plant origin and include wood-based materials such as wood chips, wood flour, and sawdust, as well as nut pits and nut shells such as coconut shell. Chemical activation agents may include: alkali metal hydroxides, carbonates, sulfides, and sulfates; alkaline earth carbonates, chlorides, sulfates, and phosphates; phosphoric acid; polyphosphoric acid; pyrophosphoric acid; zinc chloride; sulfuric acid; and oleum. Preferred among these are phosphoric acid and zinc chloride. Most preferred is phosphoric acid.
The invention methods for producing the novel carbon can be described generally by the following sequence of steps:
1. Activating agent/lignocellulose material blending
2. Stage 1 heat treatment (plasticization)
3. Shaping and densifying
4. Stage 2 heat treatment (thermosetting)
The activation typically occurs in a rotary kiln in which the temperature of the thermoset shaped mixture is raised to about 550° C. This basic process normally is followed with washing and drying steps.
One particular method for producing the invention activated carbon product (Process A) involves blending a 1:3-1:1 mixture respectively of a chemical activating agent, preferably phosphoric acid or zinc chloride, with a lignocellulose material, preferably wood chips, sawdust (or, wood dust), or wood flour, with agitation for up to one hour at a temperature of from about 35° C. to about 95° C., after which the mixture is spread on a flat surface in layers of a thickness of from about 6 mm to about 25 mm. The mixture is subjected to a first stage heat treatment at a temperature of from about 35° C. to about 95° C. for a time sufficient that the mixture material goes through a transition from a highly plastic phase to begin to thermoset. Then the material is subjected to a densification step which involves processing through a compressive shaping device such as an extruder or a Marumerizer. Then the shaped material is heat treated again (second stage) at from about 35° C. to about 95° C. to complete the densification by completing the thermosetting process. Upon complete elimination of plasticity, the temperature is gradually increased to from about 425° C. to about 650° C.
Typical product characteristics resulting from this process are shown in Table I.
TABLE I______________________________________Invention Activated Carbon Product Characteristics______________________________________Butane Working Capacity 17.7 g/100 cm3Butane Activity 68.0 g100 gSurface Area 2180 m2 /gApparent Density 0.30 g/cm3Particle Density 0.46 g/cm3Mesopore Content 58%Macropore Content 12%______________________________________
The surprising improvement in butane working capacity of the new carbon product reflects a major increase in mesoporosity of the individual carbon particles, at the expense of macroporosity.
A standard determination of surface area of activated carbon usually is by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) model of physical adsorption using nitrogen as the adsorptive. This was the method employed in calculating the invention carbon surface areas, based on nitrogen adsorption isotherm data in the range of 0.05 to 0.20 relative pressure.
In the case of granular activated carbon, the density is an important feature of the effectiveness of the adsorbent, as many applications of granular or shaped activated carbon involve a static active carbon bed of fixed volumetric size. The apparent density of the invention activated carbon is measured according to the method ASTM D 2854. Measurements of apparent density of carbon in a packed bed of particles reported herein were based on 10×25 mesh carbon materials.
The density of the individual carbon particles was determined by displacement of mercury using a Micromeritics® PoreSizer 9310 instrument. The density is based on the mass of a particle and its volume including pores smaller than 35 micrometers.
Butane activity of the invention carbons was calculated by placing a weighed sample of the dry activated carbon, approximately 15 ml in volume, in a 1.45 cm diameter tube and admitting butane gas therein. The amount adsorbed at saturation at 25° C. is weighed and reported as butane activity in grams of butane per 100 grams carbon (g/100 g). The tube then is purged with air at 25° C. at 250 ml/min. for 40 minutes, and the amount of butane removed is reported as butane working capacity (BWC) in grams of butane per 100 ml of carbon (g/100 cm3). The carbon mass to volume conversion is made on the basis of the measured value of the carbon apparent density. In view of the interrelationship of butane activity, BWC, and density, for carbons of a density from about 0.25 to about 0.40 g/cm3, a BWC>15 can be achieved with butane activity values of at least about 50 g/100 g.
Porosity in pores larger than 50 nm (macroporosity) was determined using a Micromeritics® PoreSizer 9310 which measures the volume of mercury forced into pores under the influence of pressure. The distribution of pore volume with pore size is calculated using the Washburn equation, a standard model.
Porosity in pores smaller than 50 nm was determined using a Micromeritics® DigiSorb 2600. Adsorption isotherm data for nitrogen, measured at a temperature of about 77° K, are used with the Kelvin and Halsey equations to determine the distribution of pore volume with pore size of cylindrical pores according to the standard model of Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda. For the purposes of the examples and the invention claimed herein, macroporosity consists of pore diameters greater than 50 nm, mesoporosity consists of pore diameters of from 1.8 to 50 nm, and microporosity consists of pore diameters of less than 1.8 nm.
In an alternative method (Process B), after the blending and stage 1 heat treatment steps as above, the critical steps of shaping and densification are achieved in a high-speed mixer/agglomerator such as a pin-mixer where particles of plastic char with a high density are formed. Formed granules must be heat treated further as provided in the earlier discussed process to obtain strong bonding and, consequently, to maintain the particle strength.
Activated carbon prepared according to this process exhibited a butane working capacity of 18.1 g/100 cm3, an apparent density of 0.29 g cm3, a particle density of 0.48 g cm3, a mesopore volume of 60%, and a macropore volume of 12%.
Another method for producing novel activated gas-phase carbon of high density and high activity (Process C) involves reducing the macroporosity of the activated carbon product by blending the activating agent and lignocellulose material under conditions (of temperature and acid concentration of the activating agent) such that the lignocellulose material is substantially degraded (i.e., solubilized). For example, solubilization of wood with phosphoric acid produces a viscous fluid in which the discrete particles of the original lignocellulose can no longer be identified. In the solubilization process, the initial viscosity of the slurry mixture is very close to that of the phosphoric acid alone. As the temperature rises, the viscosity of the mass increases as the wood elements thereof dissolve. If the viscosity increases too fast during this stage 1 heat treatment, water can be added to maintain sufficient fluidity for continued mixing under heat at from about 80° C. to about 120° C. Upon reaching transition from plastic to initial thermoset, the material is subjected to shaping, stage 2 heat treatment, and activation steps as described in Process A.
The foregoing methods are capable of producing the invention high activity, high density activated carbon from relatively low density lignocellulose materials, such as wood chips, wood flour, and sawdust. An alternative variation of the invention method to achieve a high density activated carbon employs a higher density starting material, such as coconut shell (Process D). This alternative process differs from the previously discussed methods in that the stage 1 heat treatment and shaping steps are eliminated. This process also differs from prior art methods of activating coconut shell and produces novel activated carbon products as a result of the combined use of extended time at low temperature during heat treatment, drying, and thermoset, and, similar to Processes A-C, activation at a gradual heat up rate to a final temperature of about 480° C. Due to its natural density, conventional activation of coconut shell results in activated carbon material with high microporosity and mesoporosity and low macroporosity. Thus, the improvement in adsorption capacity resulting in a novel activated carbon is achieved by the invention process by creating higher mesoporosity.
Alternative novel methods for producing the invention activated carbon product are disclosed in the following examples.
A series of seven batches of activated carbon products of Process A was prepared by mixing 2,070 g of concentrated phosphoric acid solution (85-86% concentration) with 1,950 g of sawdust (43% moisture) for an acid:sawdust ratio of 1.6:1 (by dry weight of their respective solids) and stirring for 30 minutes at 80°-95° C., after which the mixture (a mass of discreet sawdust particles) was transferred to shallow glass trays and spread into 1-1.5 cm thick layers for continued heating in an oven. Heat treatment was continued at 70° C. for about 36 hours, at which time the material began transition from plastic to thermoset (i.e., product appears dry and not sticky but is nevertheless soft enough to be shaped in the Marumerizer). Upon shaping by processing in the Marumerizer (residence time of 15-30 minutes at 800 rpm), the individual sawdust particles are formed into smooth beads. The shaped product is returned to the oven for continued heating at 85° C. for about 36 hours to complete the thermosetting process.
Activation of the thermoset char was performed in a bench-scale, direct-fired rotary kiln by gradually raising the temperature to about 480° C.
The seven batches of carbon yielded butane working capacity values ranging from 16.1 g/100 cm3 to 18.2 g/100 cm3. The properties of these activated carbon products are listed in Table II.
TABLE II______________________________________Activated Carbon Properties Butane ApparentSample BWC Activity DensityNo. g/100 cm3 g/100 g g/cm3______________________________________1 16.7 67.2 0.282 17.3 64.4 0.303 18.2 68.8 0.304 16.2 63.6 0.285 17.1 66.6 0.296 16.1 63.8 0.297 18.1 69.0 0.30______________________________________
A 1.3 liter sample having a BWC of 17.7 g/100 cm3 was prepared for gasoline vapor adsorption testing by combining product of sample nos. 3, 5, and 7 from Example 1. In this test, a 375 ml sample of activated carbon in a test canister is challenged with gasoline vapor generated by bubbling 200 ml/min of air through 300 ml of gasoline at a temperature of 30° C. The vapor is adsorbed on the carbon and at saturation breakthrough is detected with a total hydrocarbon analyzer at a concentration of about 5000 ppm. After breakthrough, a countercurrent flow of air is admitted at a rate of 7.5 ml/min for 10 minutes to desorb the gasoline vapor. The adsorption/desorption steps are continued for 25 cycles. The gasoline working capacity (GWC) is calculated as the average mass of vapor adsorbed during cycles 21-25, expressed on a carbon volume basis. The test showed a capacity of 61 g/1, which compares to a 50 g/1 for commercial WV-A 1100.
Also, pore size distribution of this sample combination was determined by using mercury intrusion and nitrogen adsorption. Analysis of this data indicates that mechanical action in the Marumerizer substantially decreased the macropore (>50 nm) volume of the product. An increase in the large mesopore (5-50 nm) suggests that some kind of squeezing action took place, but there was, nevertheless, a net reduction in porosity outside the small mesopore range (important for butane working capacity), which translates to an increase in effective density. Table III compares the invention carbon with commercial WV-A 1100 in terms of butane capacity and porosity.
TABLE III__________________________________________________________________________ PERCENT OF PARTICLE VOLUME 5-50 nm 1.8-5 nm BACT BWC Ad PD >50 nm Large Small <1.8 nmCarbon g/100 g g/100 ml gm/ml gm/ml Macro Meso Meso Micro__________________________________________________________________________WV-A 1100 47.3 11.8 .28 .48 23 9 38 6Invention 68.0 17.7 .30 .46 12 12 46 8__________________________________________________________________________
An activated carbon product of Process A was prepared by blending 2235 g of phosphoric acid solution (86% concentration) with 2069 g of 4×14 mesh (U.S.) wood chips (42% moisture, produced using a rotary drum chipper) for an acid:wood ratio of 1.6:1. The mixture was stirred for 60 minutes at 50° C. after which it was transferred to shallow glass trays for heat treatment in an oven at about 120° C. for 45 minutes. Following this initial heat treatment, the mixture was transferred to an oven and heated at about 140° C. for 30 minutes. The plastic char, which retained the discrete nature of the wood chips, was processed in a Marumerizer for 30 minutes to partially shape and densify it, but without substantially changing its granular nature. Then it was transferred to an oven to complete the thermosetting process by heating it at 85° C. for 16 hours. The thermoset char was activated by raising its temperature to about 480° C., using a direct-fired, rotary kiln. The activated char was washed with water to remove the residual acid and the granular activated carbon product evaluated, yielding the following product property values:
TABLE IV______________________________________Butane Working Capacity: 15.8 g/100 cm3Apparent Density 0.26 g/cm3Butane Activity 68.2 g/100 cm3Particle Density 0.43 g/cm3Surface Area 2490 m2 /gMacropore Content 19%Mesopore Content 54%______________________________________
An activated carbon product of Process B was prepared by combining 2,000 g of aqueous 86% concentration phosphoric acid solution with 1,900 g of wet sawdust (for an acid:sawdust ratio of 1.6:1) and blending same in a mechanical mixer for 10 minutes at room temperature. The mixture was heated in an oven at 177° C. for 45 minutes and then dried in a steam oven at 177° C. for 45 minutes, with stirring at 15 minute intervals. The plastic char mixture, in an amount of 2.7 liters, was fed into a batch pinmixer rotating at 1,000 rpm, and 100 ml water was added. This now granular char was densified into particles of about 10×25 mesh (0.7-2.0 mm) in size in about 5 minutes. The shaped char was thermoset in an oven at 82° C. for 60 hours. Subsequently, the char was activated by heating to 480° C. in about 60 minutes in a direct-fired rotary kiln. The activated product was washed with water and evaluated. The measured product properties were compared with measured properties of commercial WV-A 1100 as presented in Table V.
TABLE V______________________________________Product Properties Process B WV-A 1100______________________________________Butane Working Capacity 18.1 g/100 cm3 11.8 g/100 cm3Butane Activity 69.7 g/100 g 47.3 g/100 gApparent Density 0.29 g/cm3 0.28 g/cm3Particle Density 0.48 g/cm3 0.48 g/cm3Macropore Volume 12% 23%Mesopore Volume 60% 47%Surface Area 2420 m2 /g 1840 m2 /g______________________________________
An activated carbon product of Process C was prepared by heating 698 g of 86% phosphoric acid to 105° C. Sawdust in a total amount of 300 g (dry basis) was added (causing the acid temperature to drop) and mixed as the temperature of the mixture was raised to 75° C. Mixing continued for 57 minutes with periodic addition of sufficient water to maintain fluidity. The viscous fluid product then was transferred to glass trays and heat treated at a temperature of 120° C. for 16 hours. The resultant solidified product was granulated and the granules were processed in a Marumerizer for 13 minutes converting them to smooth, spheroidal particles. Finally, this product was activated in a direct fired, rotary kiln by heating to 480° C. The resultant activated carbon had the following product properties:
TABLE VI______________________________________Butane Working Capacity 17.6 g/100 cm3Butane Activity 71.8 g/100 gApparent Density 0.29 g/cm3Particle Density 0.46 g/cm3Macropore Content 13%Mesopore Content 55%Surface Area 2260 m2 /g______________________________________
An activated carbon product of Process D was prepared by mixing 400 g of 8×20 mesh coconut shell 12.7% moisture) and 660 g of 86% concentration phosphoric acid for 10 minutes. The mixture then was heat treated in three phases. Spread in a thin layer (.sup.˜ 13 mm thick), the mixture was heated in an oven at 65°-70° C. for 8 hours with stirring at 30 minute intervals, then an additional 16 hours without stirring. In the second phase, the oven temperature was raised to 95°-100° C. for 8 hours with stirring at 30 minute intervals, then an additional 16 hours without stirring. Finally, the oven temperature was increased to 120° C. for 2 hours, after which the mixture was removed.
This heat treated char was activated in a direct fired laboratory rotary kiln under an atmosphere of air and flue gases from a natural gas burner. The kiln temperature was raised from 30° C. to 480° C. After cooling, the activated material was washed and dried in a tray drying oven. The results of analyses conducted of the product are:
TABLE VII______________________________________Butane Activity 63.6 g/100 gButane Working Capacity 16.7 g/100 cm3Apparent Density 0.30 g/cm3Particle Density 0.50Macropore Content 12%Mesopore Content 55%Surface Area 2260 m2 /g______________________________________
In a modification of the Process A, as applied in Example 1, sawdust was mixed with phosphoric acid, and the mixture was heat treated until the material began a transition from plastic to a thermoset state. Then the heat treated material was subjected to a mechanical pressing (new step) by passing it between two closely spaced rollers. The resultant compressed material was granulated and processed in a Marumerizer for about 30 minutes. Subsequent heat treatment and activation were performed as in Example 1. The surprising result of the mechanical pressing step is that it increases the butane activity of the product and, in conjunction therewith, also raises the butane working capacity. The properties of the product are as shown in Table VIII.
TABLE VIII______________________________________Butane Working Capacity 19.2 g/100 cm3Butane Activity 72.5 g/100 gApparent Density 0.30 g/cm3Particle Density 0.47 g/cm3Macropore Content 12%Mesopore Content 62%Surface Area 2480 m2 /g______________________________________
In each of the above examples, activated carbon of surprisingly high butane working capacity is produced by increasing surface area without sacrificing material density. This has been achieved by increasing carbon particle mesoporosity. In most instances the increase in mesoporosity has been created while simultaneously reducing the carbon particle's macroporosity.
While the invention high activity, high density carbon has been described and illustrated herein by references to various specific materials, procedures, and examples, it is understood that the invention is not restricted to the particular materials, combinations of materials, and procedures selected for that purpose. With the disclosure herein of the concepts employed to produce the novel carbon, numerous variations of such details can be employed, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2083303 *||Jan 24, 1936||Jun 8, 1937||Franz Krezil||Production of activated carbon|
|US2508474 *||Sep 19, 1945||May 23, 1950||Union Carbide & Carbon Corp||Production of activated carbon|
|US4155878 *||May 10, 1978||May 22, 1979||Westvaco Corporation||Process for making activated carbon with control of metal ion concentration in phosphoric acid|
|US4677086 *||May 18, 1984||Jun 30, 1987||Westvaco Corporation||Shaped wood-based active carbon|
|US4869739 *||Jul 20, 1988||Sep 26, 1989||Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha||Fuel vapor collecting device|
|US5039651 *||Sep 7, 1989||Aug 13, 1991||Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.||Chemically activated shaped carbon, process for producing same and use thereof|
|US5102855 *||Jul 20, 1990||Apr 7, 1992||Ucar Carbon Technology Corporation||Process for producing high surface area activated carbon|
|US5118329 *||May 14, 1991||Jun 2, 1992||Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.||Process for recovering a hydrophobic organic compound by absorption and desorption with a chemically activated shaped carbon|
|EP0423967A2 *||Oct 2, 1990||Apr 24, 1991||Norit (Uk) Limited||A method of producing granular activated carbon|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5324703 *||Jul 21, 1993||Jun 28, 1994||Westvaco Corporation||Method of preparation of gasoline vapor adsorptive activated carbon|
|US5360461 *||Aug 23, 1993||Nov 1, 1994||United Technologies Corporation||Polymeric storage bed for hydrogen|
|US5416056 *||Oct 25, 1993||May 16, 1995||Westvaco Corporation||Production of highly microporous activated carbon products|
|US5626637 *||Mar 14, 1995||May 6, 1997||Westvaco Corporation||Low pressure methane storage with highly microporous carbons|
|US5637339 *||Apr 27, 1995||Jun 10, 1997||Hickory Specialties, Inc.||Method of making a tar-depleted liquid smoke|
|US5880061 *||Jun 12, 1996||Mar 9, 1999||Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation||Active carbon and method for its production|
|US5905629 *||Jul 23, 1997||May 18, 1999||Westvaco Corporation||High energy density double layer energy storage devices|
|US5926361 *||Jun 23, 1997||Jul 20, 1999||Westvaco Corporation||High power density double layer energy storage devices|
|US5972826 *||Mar 28, 1995||Oct 26, 1999||Cabot Corporation||Densified carbon black adsorbent and a process for adsorbing a gas with such an adsorbent|
|US6043183 *||Jun 23, 1997||Mar 28, 2000||Westvaco Corporation||High power density carbons for use in double layer energy storage devices|
|US6057262 *||Jun 1, 1998||May 2, 2000||University Of Kentucky Research Foundation||Activated carbon and process for making same|
|US6060424 *||Jan 26, 1999||May 9, 2000||Westvaco Corporation||High energy density carbons for use in double layer energy storage devices|
|US6439138 *||May 29, 1998||Aug 27, 2002||Hamon Research-Cottrell, Inc.||Char for contaminant removal in resource recovery unit|
|US6517906||Jun 21, 2000||Feb 11, 2003||Board Of Trustees Of University Of Illinois||Activated organic coatings on a fiber substrate|
|US6530974 *||Mar 27, 2001||Mar 11, 2003||Ceca S.A.||Method for the separation of molecules in the gas phase by adsorption by means of agglomerated solid inorganic adsorbents with a narrow and calibrated mesopore distribution|
|US6540815 *||Mar 18, 2002||Apr 1, 2003||Meadwestvaco Corporation||Method for reducing emissions from evaporative emissions control systems|
|US6595147||Feb 28, 2002||Jul 22, 2003||Hamon Research-Cottrell, Inc.||Method for adsorbing contaminants from flue gas|
|US6733827 *||Apr 11, 2001||May 11, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Co.||Processes for manufacturing particles coated with activated lignosulfonate|
|US6997976 *||Aug 14, 2003||Feb 14, 2006||Beth-El Zikhron-Yaaqov||Filtering devices|
|US7186441 *||Feb 4, 2004||Mar 6, 2007||Pur Water Purification Products, Inc.||Processes for manufacturing particles coated with activated lignosulfonate|
|US7603964||Apr 29, 2005||Oct 20, 2009||The Clorox Company||Composite particle animal litter and method thereof|
|US7614506||Jun 18, 2003||Nov 10, 2009||Pur Water Purification Products Inc.||Water filter materials and water filters and processes for using the same|
|US7614507||Nov 11, 2003||Nov 10, 2009||Pur Water Purification Products Inc.||Water filter materials, water filters and kits containing particles coated with cationic polymer and processes for using the same|
|US7614508||Nov 11, 2003||Nov 10, 2009||Pur Water Purification Products Inc.||Water filter materials, water filters and kits containing silver coated particles and processes for using the same|
|US7712613||Sep 16, 2008||May 11, 2010||Pur Water Purification Products, Inc.||Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles|
|US7740765||May 13, 2009||Jun 22, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Methods for treating water|
|US7740766||May 13, 2009||Jun 22, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Methods for treating water|
|US7749394||May 13, 2009||Jul 6, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Methods of treating water|
|US7850859||May 13, 2009||Dec 14, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Water treating methods|
|US7897540||Feb 5, 2004||Mar 1, 2011||Cataler Corporation||Process for producing activated carbon|
|US7922008||Jul 10, 2009||Apr 12, 2011||The Procter & Gamble Company||Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles|
|US8119012||Mar 7, 2011||Feb 21, 2012||The Procter & Gamble Company||Water filter materials and water filters containing a mixture of microporous and mesoporous carbon particles|
|US8226747||Aug 29, 2008||Jul 24, 2012||Kuraray Chemical Co., Ltd.||Adsorbent, process for producing the same, canister and method for using the same|
|US8241706||Sep 3, 2010||Aug 14, 2012||The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois||High surface area ceramic coated fibers|
|US8555896||Dec 19, 2007||Oct 15, 2013||Philip Morris Usa Inc.||Activated carbon from microcrystalline cellulose|
|US8759253||Jul 18, 2008||Jun 24, 2014||Cabot Norit Nederland B.V.||Chemically activated carbon and methods for preparing same|
|US9096648||Aug 2, 2012||Aug 4, 2015||Emd Millipore Corporation||Methods of reducing level of one or more impurities in a sample during protein purification|
|US9253961||Feb 4, 2013||Feb 9, 2016||The Clorox Company||Composite absorbent particles|
|US9283540||Oct 11, 2007||Mar 15, 2016||The Clorox Company||Composite absorbent particles|
|US9284614 *||Mar 8, 2012||Mar 15, 2016||Showa Denko K.K.||Pre-treatment method for plant biomass hydrolysis reaction raw materials and plant biomass saccharification method|
|US9312077||Dec 17, 2012||Apr 12, 2016||Calgon Carbon Corporation||Double layer capacitors|
|US9517445 *||Mar 8, 2013||Dec 13, 2016||The Curators Of The University Of Missouri||High surface area carbon and process for its production|
|US9732649||Oct 10, 2013||Aug 15, 2017||Ingevity South Carolina, Llc||Evaporative fuel vapor emission control systems|
|US20020150686 *||Apr 11, 2001||Oct 17, 2002||Mitchell Michael Donovan||Processes for manufacturing particles coated with activated lignosulfonate|
|US20030196954 *||Apr 17, 2003||Oct 23, 2003||King Car Food Industrial Co., Ltd.||Method for manufacturing activated carbon from coffee waste|
|US20030217963 *||Jun 18, 2003||Nov 27, 2003||The Procter & Gamble Company||Water filter materials and water filters and processes for using the same|
|US20030217967 *||Jun 18, 2003||Nov 27, 2003||The Procter & Gamble Company||Processes for manufacturing water filter materials and water filters|
|US20040159237 *||Aug 14, 2003||Aug 19, 2004||Karl-Hans Fuchs||Filtering devices|
|US20040159596 *||Nov 11, 2003||Aug 19, 2004||Mitchell Michael Donovan||Water filter materials, water filters and kits containing silver coated particles and processes for using the same|
|US20040166050 *||Feb 5, 2004||Aug 26, 2004||Cataler Corporation||Process for producing activated carbon|
|US20040219293 *||Feb 4, 2004||Nov 4, 2004||The Procter & Gamble Company||Processes for manufacturing particles coated with activated lignosulfonate|
|US20050005869 *||Jul 11, 2003||Jan 13, 2005||The Clorox Company||Composite absorbent particles|
|US20050005870 *||Jun 4, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||The Clorox Company||Composite absorbent particles|
|US20050014642 *||Jul 15, 2004||Jan 20, 2005||Cataler Corporation||Activated carbon and canister|
|US20050035062 *||Aug 30, 2004||Feb 17, 2005||Hiltzik Laurence H.||Coated activated carbon for contaminant removal from a fluid stream|
|US20050123763 *||Nov 10, 2004||Jun 9, 2005||Hiltzik Laurence H.||Colored activated carbon and method of preparation|
|US20050202241 *||Mar 10, 2004||Sep 15, 2005||Jian-Ku Shang||High surface area ceramic coated fibers|
|US20050221087 *||Feb 14, 2005||Oct 6, 2005||James Economy||Nanoporous chelating fibers|
|US20050279696 *||Apr 29, 2005||Dec 22, 2005||Bahm Jeannine R|
|US20060243212 *||Apr 29, 2005||Nov 2, 2006||Jenkins Dennis B||Composite particle animal litter and method thereof|
|US20070122609 *||Jan 25, 2007||May 31, 2007||Hiltzik Laurence H||Porous coatings on adsorbent materials|
|US20070266997 *||Feb 23, 2007||Nov 22, 2007||Clontz Clarence R Jr||Evaporative emission control using selective heating in an adsorbent canister|
|US20080041226 *||Aug 29, 2007||Feb 21, 2008||Hiltzik Laurence H||Selective heating in adsorbent systems|
|US20080093303 *||Feb 8, 2006||Apr 24, 2008||Mario Elmen Tremblay||Method for removal of nano-sized pathogens from liquids|
|US20080184939 *||Feb 15, 2008||Aug 7, 2008||The Clorox Company||Composite Absorbent Particles|
|US20080308045 *||Oct 11, 2007||Dec 18, 2008||The Clorox Company||Composite Absorbent Particles|
|US20090007852 *||Oct 30, 2007||Jan 8, 2009||The Clorox Company||Composite Absorbent Particles|
|US20090008323 *||Sep 16, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Jeannine Rebecca Bahm||Water Filter Materials And Water Filters Containing A Mixture Of Microporous And Mesoporous Carbon Particles|
|US20090159091 *||Dec 19, 2007||Jun 25, 2009||Philip Morris Usa Inc.||Activated carbon from microcrystalline cellulose|
|US20090218291 *||May 13, 2009||Sep 3, 2009||Michael Donovan Mitchell||Methods for treating water|
|US20100006508 *||Jul 7, 2009||Jan 14, 2010||The Procter & Gamble Company||Multi-Stage Water Filters|
|US20100212496 *||Aug 29, 2008||Aug 26, 2010||Kuraray Chemical Co., Ltd.||Adsorbent, process for producing the same, canister and method for using the same|
|US20100298134 *||Jul 18, 2008||Nov 25, 2010||Ralph Richard De Leede||Chemically activated carbon and methods for preparing same|
|US20110123474 *||Nov 24, 2009||May 26, 2011||Jenkins Dennis B||Non-Visible Activated Carbon in Absorbent Materials|
|US20130190542 *||Mar 8, 2013||Jul 25, 2013||The Curators Of The University Of Missouri||High surface area carbon and process for its production|
|US20140007862 *||Mar 8, 2012||Jan 9, 2014||Showa Denko K.K.||Pre-treatment method for plant biomass hydrolysis reaction raw materials and plant biomass saccharification method|
|USRE38844||Oct 21, 2003||Oct 25, 2005||Meadwestvaco Corporation||Method for reducing emissions from evaporative emissions control systems|
|EP2574618A1||Aug 9, 2012||Apr 3, 2013||EMD Millipore Corporation||Methods of reducing level of one or more impurities in a sample during protein purification|
|EP2942353A1||Aug 9, 2012||Nov 11, 2015||EMD Millipore Corporation||Methods of reducing level of one or more impurities in a sample during protein purificaton|
|WO2002083559A1||Jun 6, 2001||Oct 24, 2002||Westvaco Corporation||Shaped activated carbon|
|WO2003046362A1||Jul 8, 2002||Jun 5, 2003||Meadwestvaco Corporation||Method for reducing emissions from evaporative emissions control systems|
|U.S. Classification||502/416, 502/424, 502/423, 502/426, 95/901, 123/519, 502/427, 502/425|
|International Classification||C01B31/12, C01B31/14, B01J20/20|
|Cooperative Classification||C01B32/342, Y10S95/901|
|Feb 21, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: WESTVACO CORPORATION - A CORP. OF DE, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNORS:TOLLES, EDWARD D.;DIMITRI, MITCHELL S.;MATTHEWS, CHARLES C.;REEL/FRAME:006028/0380
Effective date: 19920221
|Dec 28, 1993||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Aug 5, 1996||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jul 11, 2000||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Aug 28, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION, CONNECTICUT
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:WESTVACO CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:013922/0117
Effective date: 20021231
|May 17, 2004||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12