|Publication number||US5245023 A|
|Application number||US 07/700,109|
|Publication date||Sep 14, 1993|
|Filing date||May 8, 1991|
|Priority date||Jun 29, 1987|
|Also published as||US5534432, US5663063, US6528706, US6881560, US7109007, US20050064565, US20060040281|
|Publication number||07700109, 700109, US 5245023 A, US 5245023A, US-A-5245023, US5245023 A, US5245023A|
|Inventors||Oliver P. Peoples, Anthony J. Sinskey|
|Original Assignee||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (1), Non-Patent Citations (22), Referenced by (217), Classifications (23), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The United States government has rights in this invention by virtue of grants from the National Institute of Health, Office of Naval Research, and National Science Foundation.
This is a continuation of copending application Ser. No. 07/378,155 filed on Jul. 10, 1989, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 067,695 entitled "Method for Producing Novel Polyester Biopolymers" filed Jun. 29, 1987 by Oliver P. Peoples and Anthony J. Sinskey, both now abandoned.
Synthesis by bacteria has long been the only means for production of many of the more complex biopolymers. Only recently have pathways for the synthesis of these polymers been determined. Much effort has gone into the isolation of the various enzymes and cofactors involved in these pathways. Regulation of their expression has largely been empirical, i.e., the concentration of nutrients or other factors such as oxygen level have been altered and the effect on polymer production and composition measured.
In order to have control over the production of these complex biopolymers, and to modify them in a specific fashion, it is necessary to design a system for determining the chemical steps required for their synthesis; to isolate and characterize the proteins responsible for these chemical steps; to isolate, sequence, and clone the genes encoding these proteins; and to identify, characterize, and utilize the mechanisms for regulation of the rate and level of the expression of these genes.
Polyhydroxybutyrate, a commercially useful complex biopolymer, is an intracellular reserve material produced by a large number of bacteria. Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate (PHB), the polymeric ester of D(-)-3-hydroxybutyrate, was first discovered in Bacillus megaterium in 1925. Both the chemical and physical properties of this unique polyester have made it an attractive biomaterial for extensive study. PHB has a variety of potential applications, including utility as a biodegradable/thermoplastic material, as a source of chiral centers for the organic synthesis of certain antibiotics, and as a matrix for drug delivery and bone replacement. In vivo, the polymer is degraded internally to hydroxybutyrate, a normal constituent of human blood.
The enzymatic synthesis of the hydrophobic crystalline PHB granules from the C.sub. biosynthon acetyl-CoA has been studied in a number of bacteria. Three enzymes: beta ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB polymerase, are involved in the conversion of acetyl-CoA to PHB.
Thiolases are ubiquitous enzymes which catalyze the synthesis and cleavage of carbon-carbon bonds and thus occupy a central role in cellular metabolism. Different thiolase enzymes are involved in terpenoid, steroid, macrolide and other biosynthetic pathways as well as the degradation of fatty acids. In Z. ramigera, the condensation of two acetyl-CoA groups to form acetoacetyl-CoA is catalyzed by beta-ketothiolase. The acetoacetyl-CoA is then reduced by an NADP-specific reductase to form D(-)-beta-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, the substrate for PHB polymerase.
Beta-Ketothiolase (acetyl-CoA-CoA-C-acetyltransferase, E. C. 22.214.171.124) has been studied in A. beijerinckii (Senior and Dawes, Biochem. J., 134, 225-238 (1973)), A. eutrophus (Oeding and Schlegel, Biochem. J., 134, 239-248 (1973)), Clostridium pasteurianum (Bernt and Schlegel, Arch. Microbiol., 103, 21-30 (1975)), and Z. ramigera (Nishimura et al., Arch. Microbiol., 116, 21-27 (1978)). The cloning and expression of the Z. ramigera acetoacetyl-CoA reductase genes was described in U.S. Ser. No. 067,695. This gene was then used as a hybridization probe to isolate the reductase gene from other bacterial species, including Alcaligenes eutrophus and Nocardia.
The reductase involved in PHB biosynthesis in Z. ramigera is stereospecific for the D(-)-isomer of hydroxybutyryl-CoA and uses NADP(H) exclusively as a cofactor. The best characterized Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase is that from Zoogloea, described by Saito et al., Arch. Microbiol., 114, 211-217 (1977) and Tomita et al., Biochemistry of Metabolic Processes, 353, D. Lennon et al., editors (Elsevier, Holland, 1983). This NADP-specific 92,000 molecular weight enzyme has been purified by Fukui, et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 917, 365-371 (1987) to homogeneity, although only in small quantities. As described in U.S. Ser. No. 067,695, the beta-ketothiolase enzyme from Z. ramigera has now been cloned, expressed and the product thereof purified to homogeneity. The cloned gene was used to identify and isolate the corresponding beta-ketothiolase gene in other bacterial species, including Alcaligenes eutrophus and Nocardia.
The PHB polymerase in Z. ramigera is stereospecific for D-beta-hydroxybutyryl CoA. Synthetases from other bacteria such as A. eutrophus can utilize other substrates, for example, D-beta-hydroxyvaleryl CoA, since addition of propionate into A. eutrophus cultures leads to incorporation of C5 and C4 units into a PHB/HV copolymer. Griebel and Merrick, J. Bacteriol., 108, 782-789 (1971) separated the PHB polymerase from native PHB granules of B. megaterium, losing all of the enzyme activity in the process. They were able to reconstitute activity only by adding PHB granules to one of two fractions of the protein. More recently, Fukui et al., Arch. Microbiol., 110, 149-156 (1976) and Tomita et al. (1983), investigated this enzyme in Z. ramigera and partially purified the non-granule bound PHB polymerase. A method for cloning, expressing and using the product thereof in the synthesis of novel polymers was described in U.S. Ser. No. 067,695.
A whole range of polyhydroxalkanoate (PHA) storage polymers has been found to be produced by bacteria, including A. eutrophus and P. oleovorans. The PHA polymers are heteropolymers of the D-isomer of β-hydroxyalkanoates with the variation occurring in the length of the side chains (CH3--H 8 H17). For example, when grown in the presence of 5-chloropentanoic acid, A. eutrophus incorporates 3-hydroxybutyrate, 3-hydroxyvalerate and 5-hydroxyvalerate into the polymer.
Given the extremely high yields of this polymer obtainable through classic fermentation techniques, and the fact that PHB and PHA of molecular weight greater than 10,000 is useful for multiple applications, it is desirable to develop new PHB-like biopolymers to improve or create new applications.
The production of poly-beta-hydroxyalkanoates, other than PHB, by monocultures of A. eutrophus and Pseudomonas oleovorans was reported by deSmet, et al., in J. Bacteriol., 154, 870-878 (1983). In both bacteria, the polymers were produced by controlled fermentation. A. eutrophus, when grown on glucose and propionate, produces a heteropolymer of PHB-PHV, the PHV content reaching approximately 30%. P. oleovorans produces a homopolymer of poly-beta-hydroxyoctanoate when grown on octane. Nocardia has been reported to form copolymers of PHB-PH-2-butenoate when grown on n-butane. Determination of the final composition of 3-hydroxybutyrate polymers by controlled fermentation using selected substrates is also disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,477,654 to Holmes et al.
With the availability of a variety of enzymes varying as to their substrate specificity and techniques for expressing the genes encoding the enzymes in other hosts, especially plants, it is possible to provide an economic, biodegradable alternative to the presently available plastics derived from petroleum, especially polypropylene.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide further enzymes for use in a method for synthesis of complex biopolymers, particularly PHB, PHA and similar polymers.
It is a further object of this invention to isolate, sequence, and clone additional genes encoding these proteins for polymer synthesis, as well as means for regulation of the rate and level of the expression of these genes.
It is another object of the present invention to provide purified proteins expressed from the genes encoding the proteins for synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate and polyhydroxyalkanoate.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide methods for using these proteins and regulatory sequences to create novel biopolymers having polyester backbones.
It is a still further object of the present invention to provide an economic source of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates and novel related polymers, using both bacterial and plant cells for production.
A method for controlling and modifying biopolymer synthesis by manipulation of the genetics and enzymology of synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) polyesters at the molecular level in procaryotic and eukaryotic cells, especially plants.
Examples demonstrate the isolation, characterization, and expression of the genes involved in the production of PHB and PHA polymers. Genes encoding the enzymes in the PHB and PHA synthetic pathway (beta-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB polymerase or PHA polymerase) from Zoogloea ramigera strain I-16-M, Alcaligenes eutrophus, Nocardia salmonicolur, and Pseudomonas olevorans were identified or isolated and expressed in a non-PHB producing organism, E. coli.
In a preferred embodiment using bacterial cells, the polymer is made in A. eutrophus due to its capacity for accumulating PHB up to 70 to 80% dry cell weight under conditions of nitrogen or phosphate limitation. In another embodiment, the genes are introduced into plant cells for expression and synthesis of PHB, PHA, and novel polymers. Specific modifications to the polymers include variation in the chain length of the polymers and incorporation of different monomers into the polymers to produce co-polymers with different physical properties.
FIG. 1 is the thiolase gene sequence from Zoogloea ramigera. The sequences located at positions homologous to the E. coli "-10" and "-35" concensus regions (-100 to -95 and -122 and -116) upstream from the transcription start site (bold arrow) are underlined. A probable ribosome binding site is underlined (-11 to -8).
FIG. 2 is the complete nucleotide sequence of 2.3 kb of Z. ramigera DNA located downstream from the thiolase gene in clone pUCDBK1, encoding the acetoacetyl CoA reductase. The sequence of 2094 bp extending from the first Sal1 site to the second Sma1 site is shown. Also shown is the translation product of the acetoacetyl-CoA reductase structural gene extending from the ATG at nucleotide 37 to the TGA stop codon at nucleotide 760. Boxed amino acid residues 2 to 6 are identical to those obtained by Edman degradation of the purified protein. A potential ribosome binding site is underlined and a potential transcription terminator is indicated by arrows. Restriction sites for Sal1 and Sma1 are shown.
FIG. 3 shows the nucleotide sequence of a corresponding 2 kb fragment A. eutrophus DNA cloned in plasmid pAeT3. The translation products of the A. eutrophus thiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase genes extending from nucleotides 40 to 1219 and 1296 to 2034, respectively, are shown. Restriction endonuclease cleavage sites used in the construction of the overproduction vectors pAT and pAR are shown. Pst 1=Pst 1; Ava=Ava 2 and Dde=Dde 1.
FIG. 4 is the nucleotide sequence of the PHB polymerase (phbC) locus of Alcaligenes eutrophus H16. The translation product of the open reading frame from position 842 to position 2608, the predicted amino acid sequence of PHB polymerase is shown. Also shown is the translation product of the first 72 nucleotides of the phbA gene. A sequence capable of forming a hairpin structure (position 2660) is indicated by the arrows.
FIG. 5 shows the potential coding regions of the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene, open reading frames ORF1, ORF2, and ORF3. ORF1 begins at the ATG initiation codon nucleotide 554 and ends at the TGA stop codon nucleotide 2231 and encodes a polypeptide of 562 amino acids with an Mr =60,000. ORF2 begins at the ATG position 2297 and ends at the TAA position 3146. ORF2 begins at the ATG position 3217 and ends at the TGA position 4948.
FIG. 6 is the nucleotide sequence analysis of the polymerase structural gene (FIG. 6a) and ORF3 (FIG. 6b) from the 6 kb fragment containing the P. oleovorans phbC gene.
The following methods were used to isolate genes encoding beta-keto thiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, PHB polymerase, and PHA polymerase, and their expression products, to identify and characterize sequences regulating their expression, and to determine the effect of culture conditions and substrate availability on polymer production. Techniques for constructing systems for the production of PHB and PHA-like biopolymers are also disclosed. By combining these enzymes in either bacterial or plant cells with the appropriate substrates under controlled culture conditions of available oxygen and temperature, a variety of polymers can be constructed. The enzymes or nucleotide sequences controlling their expression can also be modified to alter the quantity of expression or substrate specificity to further vary the resulting polymers. An added advantage is that substrates which normally cannot be used with whole cells can be manufactured using the isolated enzymes.
The methods, genes, and products of their expression and polymer synthesis are described in detail in the following non-limiting examples.
Zoogloea ramigera strain I-16M (ATCC 19623) was used initially to study the genetics of the PHB biosynthetic pathway. Z. ramigera DNA was purified from 200 ml mid-log phase cultures as follows: cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, and resuspended in 10 ml of Tris-HCl. The cells were then spheroplasted by the addition of 10 ml of 24% w/v polyethylene glycol 8000 and 2 ml of 25 mg/ml lysozyme, followed by incubation at 37° C. for 30 min. The spheroplasts were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 5 ml of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), 300 microliters of 10% w/v SDS added, and the cells lysed by incubating at 55° C. for 10 min. An additional 10 ml of TE was added and the lysate incubated with RNAse (50 microgram/ml) and proteinase K (30 microgram/ml) for 1 h at 37° C. The DNA was then purified by CsCl gradient centrifugation.
E. coli strains were grown in LB (Luria Bertani) medium, (NaCl, 10 gl; Tryptone, 10 g/l; yeast extract, 10 g/l ) or 2XTY medium (NaCl, 5 g/l; Tryptone, 16 g/l; yeast extract, 10 g/l ). For the production of PHB or PHA by E. coli containing recombinant plasmids, minimal media was used, with the modification that the (NH4)2 SO4 concentration was decreased to 0.04%.
A. eutrophus strains were grown in Trypticase soy broth (TSB, BBL Microbiology systems, Cockeysville, Md.) or a defined minimal medium composed of 0.39 g/l MgSO4 ; 0.45 g/l K2 SO4 ; 12 ml 1.1 m H3 PO4 ; 15 mg/l FeSO4.7H2 O; 24 ml trace elements (20 mg/l CuSO4.5H2 O; 100 mg/l ZnSO4.6H2 O; 100 mg/l MnSO4.4H2 O; 2.6 g/l CaCl2.2H2 O). The pH was adjusted to 6.8 with NaOH and the medium sterilized by autoclaving. NH4 Cl was added to a final concentration of 0.1% or 0.01% as nitrogen source and fructose was added to a final concentration of 0.5-1% (w/v).
Plasmid DNA preparations were carried out using the method of Birnboim and Doly in Nucleic Acids Res., 7, 1513-1523(1979) as described by Ish-Horowicz and Burke, Nucleic Acids Res., 9, 2989-2998 (1981). Lambda DNA was prepared by standard procedures described in Maniatis et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. 1982). DNA sequence analysis was carried out using the M13mp18 and M13mp19 cloning vectors (Yanisch-Perron, et al., Gene 33,103-109 (1985)) and the dideoxy chain termination procedure of Sanger, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467 (1977). α-[35 S]-dATP and the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase 1 were purchased from Amersham. Sequence data were compiled and analysed on a VAX system.
A recombinant library of random Z. ramigera chromosomal DNA fragments was constructed using the lambda gt11 expression vector described by Young and Davis, Science, 222, 778-782 (1983). Z. ramigera DNA was first methylated using EcoRI methylase and then partially digested with DNAse 1 in the presence of Mg2+, as taught by Anderson, Nucleic Acids, 9, 3015-3026 (1981). The ends of the partially digested DNA fragments were repaired using Klenow polymerase, EcoRI linkers added, and the DNA digested to completion with an excess of EcoRI. Fragments of 2-8 kb were size-selected on a 1.5% agarose gel, purified by electroelution, and ligated with EcoRI-digested phosphatased lambda gt11 DNA. Ligations were carried out for 18 h at 4° C. using 2 micrograms of lambda gt11 DNA and 1 microgram of fragmented chromosomal DNA in a total volume of 10 microliters. The complete ligation reactions were packaged in vitro using lambda extracts prepared from E. coli strains BHB2688 and BHB2690, Hohn and Murray, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 74, 3259-3263 (1977), as described by Maniatis et al. (1982). Packaged phage were plated out and amplified on E. coli Y1088.
Screening of the lambda gt11 expression library was carried out using rabbit anti-thiolase antibodies and a modification of the procedure described by Young and Davis, Science, 222, 778-782 (1983).
Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and DNA polymerase 1 were obtained from New England Biolabs and used under conditions provided by the manufacturer. Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Corporation. All routine DNA manipulations, including plasmid purifications, E. coli transformations, etc. were performed using methods described by Maniatis, et al. (1982). Chromosomal DNA was purified from A. eutrophus strains, grown to late logarithmic phase in TSB. Transfer of restriction digested DNA samples from agarose gels to nitrocellulose filters, prehybridization and hybridization with 32 P-labelled DNA probes was as described by Peoples, et al., J. Biol. Chem. 262, 97-102 (1987). Rapid plasmid isolation from A. eutrophus recombinant strains for restriction analysis were performed by the alkaline extraction procedure of Birnboim and Doly, Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1513-1523 (1979).
The conjugal transfer of the broad host range plasmid, pLAFR3, or recombinant derivatives of pLAFR3, into A. eutrophus was performed using the method described by Easson et al, J. Bacteriol. 169, 4518-4524 (1987). In this case, however, the recipient A. eutrophus cells were not sonicated and transconjugants were selected on A. eutrophus mineral agar plates containing 0.01% NH4 Cl as nitrogen source, 1% (w/v) fructose as carbon source and 10 μg/ml tetracycline.
For Tn5 mutagenesis, a spontaneous streptomycin resistant strain of A. eutrophus 11599 (1599 S1) was used. Transfer of pRK602 (Tn5) was carried out as described above using E. coli MM294A (pRK602) as the only donor. A. eutrophus strains containing Tn5 were selected for by growth on streptomycin (500 μg/ml) and kanamycin (100 μg/ml).
Thiolase antiserum was prepared in New Zealand White female rabbits, using purified thiolase protein by standard procedures. Antibody titer was estimated by the Ouchterlony double-diffusion assay, Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 26, 507-515(1949). Purified antibody was prepared from the serum by chromatography on protein A agarose according to Bighee et al., Mol. Immunol. 20, 1353-1357 (1983). Approximately 4×104 recombinant phage adsorbed to E. coli Y1090 were plated out on 15 cm LB-agar plates and incubated at 42° C. for 3 h. The plates were then overlayed with nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schull, BA85), which had previously been saturated in 10 mM IPTG, and incubated a further 4 h at 37° C. Filters were removed, washed for 10 min in TBST (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.9, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20), incubated in TBST plus 20% v/v fetal calf serum for 30 min, and rinsed in TBST. First antibody was bound by incubating the filters in 10 ml TBST plus purified anti-thiolase antibody (10 microliters) for 1 h at room temperature. The filters were subsequently washed in three changes of TBST for 5 min each time. Bound first antibody was detected using a biotinavidin horseradish peroxidase detection system (Clontech Laboratories) and horseradish peroxidase color development reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Va.).
Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis according to the method of Laemmli, Nature 222, 680-685 (1970) and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose filters (Schleicher & Schuill BA85), essentially as described by Burnette, Anal. Biochem. 112, 195-203 (1981). Following transfer overnight at 30 V, filters were rinsed in TBS (TBST without Tween-20) and incubated in TBS plus 5% bovine serum albumin. Proteins reacting with anti-thiolase serum were then detected by incubating the filters in 100 ml of TBS, 1% gelatin containing 2 ml of anti-thiolase serum for 1-2 h. Bound first antibody was subsequently detected using goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate and horseradish peroxidase color development reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, Calif.).
DNA blots were prepared using DNA fragments separated on agarose gels by the sandwich blot method of Smith and Summers, Anal. Biochem. 109, 123-129 (1980) based on the technique developed by Southern, J. Mol. Biol., 98, 503-517 (1975). Filters were hybridized with DNA probes labeled to a high specific activity (0.1-1×108 cpm/μg of DNA) with [α-32 P]dATP, by nick translation, Rigby et al., J. Mol. Biol., 113, 237-251 (1977). Prehybridizations and hybridizations were carried out at 65° C. in sealed polythene bags. The prehybridization/hybridization solution contained 5×SSCP (1×SSCP contains 0.15 M NaCl, 0.15 M sodium citrate, 10 mM Na2 HPO4, 10 mM NaH2 PO4), 5×Denhardt's solution, 0.1% (w/v) SDS, 10 mM EDTA, and 100 μg/ml sonicated denatured salmon DNA. Filters were prehybridized for 8-18 h and hybridized for 16-18 h using 107 cpm of labeled DNA probe per filter.
Lysogens of lambda gt11 recombinant clones were prepared in E. coli Y1089 as described by Young and Davis, Science 222, 778-782 (1983). For the preparation and analysis of lambda-coded proteins, lysogens were grown at 30° C. in LB (100 ml) until they reached an OD600 of 0.5. The prophage was induced by a 20 min incubation at 45° C., IPTG added to 5 mM and the induced lysogens incubated at 37° C. for 1 h. Cells were harvested, resuspended in assay buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM beta-mercaptoethanol, 5% (v/v) glycerol), lysed by sonication, cell debris pelleted by centrifugation, and the cell extracts stored at -20° C. The protein concentrations of bacterial lysates were assayed by the method of M. M. Bradford in Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 (1976), using bovine serum albumin as a standard. Thiolase-enzyme assays were performed as described by Nishimura, et al., Arch. Microbiol. 116, 21-27 (1978).
DNA fragments were cloned into the M13 vectors mp10 and mp11 and sequenced by the dideoxy chain-termination method of Sanger et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 141-158 (1980), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 5463-5467 (1977). The M13 sequencing primer and other reagents were purchased from Amersham Corp. G/C rich regions were resequenced using dITP in place of dGTP as described by Mills and Kramer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 2232-2235 (1979). Computer-assisted sequence analysis was accomplished using the Staden programs. Acids Res. 10, 141-158 (1984).
Approximately 2×105 recombinants were obtained from 1 μg of purified target DNA, and amplified in E. coli Y1088. A total of 105 amplified phage were screened using purified rabbit anti-thiolase antibodies. The initial screening identified 10 potentially positive clones (LDBK1-LDBK10 ). Analysis by restriction digestions demonstrated that clones LDBK2-10 are identical. Clones LDBK1 and LDBK2 were selected for further study. LDBK1 has an insert composed of 2 EcoRI fragments of 3.6 kb and 0.75 kb. LDBK2 has an insert composed of 3 EcoRI fragments of 1.65 kb and 1.08 kb.
The proteins coded for by the LDBK1 and LDBK2 insert sequences were analyzed both for thiolase-enzyme activity and for cross-reaction to rabbit anti-thiolase serum. Lysogenic strains of E. coli Y1089 containing LDBK1 and LDBK2 phage DNA were prepared. Several lysogens were obtained for each clone and two of these, Y1089/LDBK1 and Y1089/LDBK2, were used for subsequent studies. A lysogen of the lambda gt11 vector, BNN97/lambda gt11, was used as a control. The results of the thiolase-enzyme assays clearly indicate that the proteins from Y1089/LDBK1 contain a substantial amount of thiolase activity. Furthermore, the thiolase activity is inducible, greater than 5-fold, by the addition of IPTG. This shows that expression of the thiolase-coding sequences is under the transcriptional control of the lac promoter contained in the lambda gt11 vector. Neither the Y1089/LDBK2 nor the BNN97/lambda gt11 protein lysates demonstrate any significant thiolase-enzyme activity even when induced with IPTG.
The size of the proteins responsible for the initial positive reaction to rabbit anti-thiolase antibodies was investigated by Western blot experiments. Protein lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to nitrocellulose filters, and screened with rabbit anti-thiolase serum. The results show an immunoreactive 40,000 dalton protein in both the IPTG-induced and non-IPTG-induced lysate of Y1089/LDBK1.
The LDBK1 insert was restriction mapped. The large 3.6 kb EcoRI fragment, containing the complete thiolase gene region, was subcloned into the plasmid vector pUC8 for ease of manipulation. Restriction analysis of one of the subclones obtained, pUCDKB1, confirmed the restriction map of this fragment in LDBK1. pUCDBK1 DNA was labeled to a high specific activity with 32 P and hybridized to nitrocellulose filters containing Z. ramigera chromosomal DNA digested with the same enzymes used to restriction map pUCDBK1. Southern hybridization experiments confirm that the 5.4 kb genomic fragment hybridizes to both a 1.45 kb Sa1I/EcoRI and 1.05 kb Sa1I fragment from pUCDBK1. Based on the result of Southern hybridization experiment, the cloned pUCDBK1 insert is represented in the Z. ramigera genome only once.
DNA sequence analysis of the pUCDBK1 insert was carried out using the M13/Sanger dideoxy chain termination method. To locate the gene-coding region, individual DNA sequences were scanned in all six reading frames for homology to the NH2 -terminal amino acid sequence. By using this approach, the gene-coding region within the 1.45 kb EcoRI/Sa1 I fragment was identified. The complete nucleotide sequence of the plus strand of the gene is shown in FIG. 1. 290 bp downstream from the EcoRI site lies the start of the thiolase structural gene, assigned by comparing the DNA sequence to the NH2 -terminal amino acid sequence. The NH2 -terminal sequence lies in the single long open reading frame which extends from position -89 to the stop codon (TAG) at nucleotide 1174. Beginning with a serine and extending for 25 residues, the experimentally determined NH2 -terminal sequence aligns identically with residues 2 through 26 of the translated DNA sequence. Translation of the DNA sequence was then used to deduce the remaining amino acid sequence from residue 27 to 391 (nucleotides 79 to 1173). Hence, translation of the DNA sequence from nucleotide 1 to 1174 (in this reading frame) encodes a 391-amino acid polypeptide with a calculated Mr of 40,598. This value is in very good agreement with that of Mr =42,000 determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Two additional pieces of evidence confirm that this translation produce is the correct amino acid sequence of thiolase. First, a search of the predicted amino acid sequence for the active site peptide (NH2-Gly-Met-Asn-Gln-Leu-Cys-Gly-Ser-Gly-COOH) located this peptide at residues 84-92. Finally, the predicted amino acid composition from the translation product and that determined experimentally are in excellent agreement. The G/C content of the 1.46 kb EcoRI-Sa1I fragment is high, 66.2%. When considered separately, the 5'-flanking 290 bp has a G/C content of 57.4% and the structural gene region 68.4%. The amino acid sequence confirms that the Z. ramigera thiolase contains 5 cysteine residues. The Z. ramigera active site cysteine is at residue Cys-89. Additional cysteines which may be involved in inter- or intradisulphide bonds are Cys-125, Cys-323, Cys-377, and Cys-387. NH2 -terminal sequence analysis indicated a serine at position 1.
Seven nucleotides upstream from the ATG start codon is a potential ribosome-binding site, 5'-CTGAGGA-3', identified by homology to the E. coli sequence. Additional start codons including two GTGs which can initiate translation in some bacterial genes are located further upstream. Examination of the 5'-flanking region for homology to the "-10" and "-35" E. coli promoter elements, identified a potential "-35" region at residues -122 to -116 and a corresponding "-10 region", 5'-TATAAT-3', at position -100 to -95. A poly(T) tract at position -255 to -266 is also present. It is clear that the only post-translational processing of thiolase is the removal of the N-formylmethionine residue, as alternate start codons, ATC or GTG, are either out of frame or have an in-frame stop codon before the start of the structural gene.
The 1.5 Kb Sa11-EcoR1 fragment from pUCDBK1 contains the entire Z. ramigera thiolase structural gene plus 283 bp of 5'/flanking DNA. A series of plasmid constructions were made in which this DNA fragment was inserted into the tac promoter vector pKK223-3 (or derivatives thereof). pZT3 was made by cleaving pUCKBK1 with Sa11, blunt-ending with Klenow polymerase and adding on EcoR1 linkers. Following digestion with EcoR1, the 1.5 Kb fragment was purified from an agarose gel and inserted into the EcoR1 site of pKK223-3. Recombinant clones having the gene inserted in the correct orientation with respect to the tac promoter were identified by restriction analysis following transformation of E. coli JM105.
A series of clones deleted of sequences in the 283 bp flanking the 5' end of the thiolase gene was then constructed. pUCDBK1 DNA was digested with EcoR1 and treated with Ba131 nuclease. Following Sa11 digestion, the ends of the fragments were repaired with Klenow and EcoR1 linkers added on. The plasmid DNA was cleaved with EcoR1 and fragments in the correct size range, 1.2-1.4 kb, purified from an agarose gel and ligated into the EcoR1 site of pKK223-3. Clones of interest were identified by restriction mapping and the extent of the 5'-deletion determined by DNA sequencing. From this series of clones, pZT3.1-pZT3.5, the clone with the largest deletion, pZT3.5, had 84 bp of the 5'-flanking DNA remaining and therefore a subsequent Ba131 deletion experiment was carried out as follows: pZT3.5 DNA was digested to completion with EcoR1 and treated with Ba131 nuclease; the ends were repaired using Klenow polymerase and EcoRI linkers ligated on, following digestion to completion with EcoR1 and BamH1, fragments corresponding to the NH2 -terminal region of thiolase were eluted from an agarose gel, ligated with BamH1 - EcoR1 digested M13mp 11 DNA and plated out on E. coli JMlOl; single-stranded DNA was prepared from 50 transformants and the extent of the 5'-deletion analyzed by T-tracking; double-stranded DNA was prepared, in vitro, from clones of interest and the EcoR1 - Bam1 inserts recovered by restriction digestion and elution from an agarose gel.
In order to reconstruct the intact thiolase gene, the 290 bp BamH1 - HindIII fragment from pZT3.5 was ligated into a vector (pKK226) derived from pKK223-3 by deleting the BamH1 site upstream from the tac promoter; this C-terminal vector was subsequently used for the reconstruction of the Ba131 deleted NH2 -termini of interest; clones pZT3.5.1 and pZT3.5.2 were used in subsequent studies.
The effect of deleting sequences in the 283 bp of DNA flanking the thiolase ATG translation initiation codon was determined by analyzing the level of thiolase activity produced by plasmids pZT3.1-pZT3.5.2. 100 ml cultures of the E. coli JM105 containing each plasmid were induced with IPTG for 15 hours and the level of thiolase assayed. The most notable feature of these results is the very high level of thiolase expression obtained with clones pZT3.3-pZT3.5.2, the maximum obtained being 178 U/mg for pZT3.5. This represents an increase of 5.9-fold as compared to plasmid pZT3 which contains the entire 283 bp of 5'-flanking DNA. The data demonstrate that the thiolase 5'-flanking sequences located between -84 (pZT3.5) and -168 (pZT3.2) strongly inhibit the expression of the thiolase gene from the tac promoter. The location of these sequences can be narrowed down to the region between -84 (pZT3.5) and -124 (pZT3.4) as the deletion of this region results in the maximum level of tac-directed thiolase expression. Further deletions to -37 (pZT3.5.1) and -26 (pZT3.5.2) do not increase the level of thiolase expression, and in fact a slight decrease is observed. It is important to note that the time course of induction for this series of clones follows the same kinetics as pZT3 and is not appreciably affected by the deletions.
In order to determine if the thiolase promoter lies in the region-84 (pZT3.5) to -124 (pZT3.4), S1 nuclease protection experiments were carried out according to the method of Berk and Sharp, Cell 12, 721-732 (1977) on Z. ramigera RNA. Total RNA was isolated from a 100 ml mid-log phase culture by the hot phenol/glass beads extraction procedure of Hinnenbusch et al., J. Biol. Chem. 258, 5238-5247 (1983). 5'-32 P-labelled DNA probe was prepared as follows: 10 μg, plasmid pZT3.1 DNA was digested to completion with Aval and subsequently treated with CIP; the Aval restriction fragments were labelled at the 5'-end with [gamma-32 P]-ATP and polynucleotide kinase; following EcoR1 digestion, the DNA was separated on an 8% acrylamide gel and the 32 P-labelled 280 bp probe fragment eluted and recovered by ethanol precipitation. Probe (10,000 cpm) and 11 μg RNA were pooled, freeze dried, resuspended in 10 μg hybridization buffer (40 mM pipes, pH 6.4; 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0; 0.4 M NaCl; 80% (v/v) formamide), denatured for 10 min at 90° C. and annealed at 55° C. overnight. 235 microliters ice-cold S1 nuclease buffer (0.25 M NaCl; 30 mM NaOAc; 1 mM ZnSO4 ; 200 μg single stranded calf thymus DNA) containing 2000 units of S1-nuclease was added followed by an incubation at 37° C. for 30 min. The reaction mixture was extracted once with phenol-chloroform and ethanol precipitated in the presence of 0.2 M NaOAc and 10 μg yeast tRNA carrier. The resulting fragments were analyzed on a 6% (w/v) acrylamide, 7 M urea DNA sequencing gel. For size standards, the Maxam Gilbert G and C sequencing reactions were performed on 50,000 cpm of 5'-32 P-labeled probe DNA. The results clearly show a protected fragment and that the RNA start site is located at the C or T residue, position -86 or -87. A control indicates that in the absence of Z. ramigera RNA, the probe is completely degraded, demonstrating the presence of the thiolase promoter regions approximately 10 bp (-96) and 35 bp (-121) upstream. The 5'-untranslated region of the thiolase is 86 bp long.
From the results of the induction experiments, it is clear that the thiolase gene can be expressed at high levels in a soluble, catalytically active form in E. coli. S1-nuclease studies map the transcription start site for the thiolase gene in Z. ramigera at nucleotides -86/-87.
Studies have demonstrated that although the "-35" region of the thiolase promoter is recognized and binds the RNA polymerase, it is the "-10" region which determines the rate of transcription initiation. In the case of pZT3, for example, the simultaneous binding of an RNA polymerase molecule to both the bector and insert promoters would result in the rapid initiation of transcription from the tac promoter which would subsequently be impeded by the presence of the polymerase molecule bound at the Zoogloea promoter. The closer the two promoters are linked, the less chance of polymerase binding to both at the same time and the lower the inhibition. Therefore, this represents one means for controlling rate of expression of the enzyme.
After identifying the promoter region of the thiolase gene and noting the absence of any potential terminator sequences downstream from the thiolase TAG stop codon, the remaining 2 kb of Zoogloea DNA present in clone pUCDBK1 was sequenced and examined for the reductase gene. A series of expression plasmids (pZT1-pZT3) containing either the entire pUDCBK1 insert or fragments thereof were constructed in the E. coli tac promoter vector pKK223.3. Each plasmid has the thiolase gene located in the correct orientation for expression from the tac promoter. It is reasonable to expect the tac promoter to direct not only thiolase expression but the expression of any genes located in the 2.3 kb downstream in an operon-like type organization. Clone pZT1 was constructed by inserting the entire 3.8 kb EcoR1 Z. ramigera DNA insert from pUCDBK1 into the EcoR1 site of the vector pKK223-3. Subsequently, pZT2 was derived from pZT1 in a straightforward manner by deleting the 850 bp Sma1 fragment. pZT3 is constructed as described for the identification of the thiolase promoter. A series of tac promoter induction experiments were performed on each of the recombinant clones pZT1, pZT2 and pZT3. The vector pKK223-3 was used as a control.
E. coli cells containing each of the plasmids were grown and induced by the addition of isopropyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) to a final concentration of 2 mM. After 15 h induction, 10 ml cultures were harvested and lysed by sonication. The cell lysates from each clone were then analyzed both by enzyme assay and on SDS-PAGE. No PHB polymerase activity was detected in any of these lysates. Each of the three recombinant plasmids pZT1, pZT2 and pZT3 demonstrate substantial levels of thiolase activity. In addition, the lysates from pZT1 and pZT2 have comparably high levels of AcAc-CoA reductase activity using NADPH as the cofactor. No reductase activity is detected in any of the lysates when NADH is used as a cofactor. The control, pKK223-3, has neither thiolase nor reductase activities. To confirm that the lysates from pZT1 and pZT2 do in fact contain the correct reductase, these lysates were also assayed for oxidation of D(-)beta-hydroxybutyryl-CoA. In both cases, enzyme activity was observed with NADP as electron acceptor.
Each of the lysates described above was also analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The results show the presence of the thiolase protein at around 42,000 daltons in protein lysates from pZT1, pZT2 and pZT3, which is not present in the control, pKK223-3. Lysates of pZT1 and pZT2 also have a small, 25,000 dalton protein which is not present in the lysate of pZT3 or the control, which corresponds to the AcAc-CoA reductase. The results demonstrate that the AcAc-CoA reductase gene is located downstream from the thiolase gene. The entire structural gene for this enzyme must be located between the 3'-end of the thiolase and the first Sma1 site downstream in pUCDBK1.
The complete nucleotide sequence of the 2339 bp located 2.3 kb downstream from the first Sa11 site in pUCDBK1 is shown in FIG. 2. Computer analysis of the sequence data, using codon usage information from the thiolase gene as a standard, identified three open reading frames. N-terminal protein sequence data was obtained from the 25,000 dalton band present in induced lysates from pZT1 and pZT2 following preparative SDS-PAGE and electroelution. This data was used to confirm the translation start site for the corresponding gene. The N-terminal five amino acids determined experimentally match residues 2 through 6 predicted from the DNA sequence of the first open reading frame. Translation of this reading frame predicts a polypeptide of 25,000 molecular weight. The translation product of the first open reading frame starting at the ATG, nucleotide 37 and ending at the TGA stop codon nucleotide is shown in FIG. 2. This is the predicted primary amino acid sequence of the acetoacetyl-CoA reductase protein.
It is evident that the acetoacetyl-CoA reductase gene in clones pZT1 and pZT2 can be expressed at reasonably high levels in E. coli. However, in both of these cases, the expression of the reductase gene from the tac promoter is not optimum due to the presence of the thiolase structural gene and 5'-flanking sequence. A simpler acetoacetyl-CoA reductase overproduction vector, pZR14, was constructed. pUCDBK1 DNA was digested to completion with Sa11 and Sma1 and the Sa11 ends repaired using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. Following the addition of EcoR1 linkers and digestion with EcoR1, the fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. The 1.05 kb fragment corresponding to the acetoacetyl-CoA reductase structural gene plus 36 bp flanking the 5'-end and 266 bp flanking the 3' end was purified and ligated into the EcoR1 site of pKK223-3. pZR14 was then identified as having the correct restriction map with the reductase gene in the right orientation. Induction experiments were performed on pZR14 as described for pZT1, pZT2 and pZT3. Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase was expressed.
The methods used in isolating the first two PHB genes from Zoogloea were applied to the identification, isolation and characterization of gene from another PHB producing species, Alcaligenes eutrophus, using the Zoogloea thiolase gene region as a hybridization probe to locate homologous sequences.
Subsequent sequence analysis of a 2 kb Pst1 fragment of A. eutrophus DNA cloned into pUC8 (clone pAeT3) identified the corresponding thiolase gene region in the A. eutrophus H16 genome. The downstream sequences in pAeT3 are also homologous to the NADP-linked reductase gene region from the Zoogloea clone pUCDBK1. The sequences of the Alcaligenes thiolase and reductase genes is shown in FIG. 3.
Cloning of the individual thiolase and reductase genes from pAeT3 into pKK 223.3, leads to expression of the corresponding enzymes. Comparisons of the Zoogloea and A. eutrophus thiolase protein sequences establish that the two proteins are 63% homologous, including the active site Cys-89.
Both the A. eutrophus and Zoogloea thiolase gene regions were used as hybridization probes to screen Nocardia and Pseudomonas olevorans DNA for homologous genes. Techniques for identifying the thiolase, reductase, and other synthetase genes from other species having homologous sequences in addition to those described above, are known to those skilled in the art.
PHB polymerase from Z. ramigera utilizes D(-)-hydroxybutyryl-CoA monomers, polymerizing them in oxoester linkages in a template-independent head to tail condensation to yield linear polymers. These polymers can contain up to 10,000 monomer units with a molecular weight in excess of 1×106. The polymer rapidly becomes insoluble and accumulates as discrete granules in the cell.
As described in U.S. Ser. No. 067,695 filed Jun. 29, 1987, a conjugal transfer system based on derivatives of the broad host range plasmid pRK290, described by Ditta et al., in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 7347-7351 (1980), transposon mutagenesis and complementation analysis can be used in conjunction with the isolation, characterization and complementation of PHB negative mutants to isolate the PHB polymerase gene for Z. ramigera and A. eutrophus. As described by Schlegel et al., Arch. Microbiol. 71, 283-294 (1970), sudan-black staining is used for the detection of PHB negative mutants. Complementation of the mutants is screened for by growing, harvesting, and lysing the cells to release PHB that can then be purified to determine its presence and molecular weight distribution. Thiolase, reductase and PHB polymerase activities in the lysates are also assayed.
These techniques were also applied to the cloning, sequencing and expression of the PHB polymerase gene (phbC) in Alcaligenes eutrophus H16 using complementation of poly(β)-hydroxybutyrate-negative mutants of A. eutrophus H16. The results demonstrate that the genes encoding the three enzymes of the PHB biosynthetic pathway are organized phbC-phbA-phbB. Expression of all three genes in E. coli results in a significant level (50% dry cell weight) of PHB production in this bacteria. phbC encodes a polypeptide of Mr=63,900 which has a hydropathy profile distinct from typical membrane proteins indicating that PHB biosynthesis probably does not involve a membrane complex.
The strategy of constructing, characterizing and complementing PHB-negative mutants of a derivative (11599 S1 , Table 1) of A. eutrophus H16 was used to identify and isolate the gene(s) encoding PHB polymerase. Transposon mutagenesis allowed use of DNA hybridization analysis to map the chromosomal location of the Tn5 insertion in any interesting strains. 32 potential PHB negative mutants were identified by their opaque colony phenotype when grown on nitrogen limited minimal agar plates. Due to the procedure used to enrich for PHB-deficient strains, it was not surprising that the 32 mutants were found by DNA hybridization using a Tn5 DNA probe to belong to only three classes. More detailed DNA hybridization studies were then used to analyze a representative from each class, i.e., strains PHB #2, PHB #3 and PHB #19. From these studies, it was possible to conclude that in the case of strain PHB #2 and strain PHB #3, the Tn5 insertion causing the opaque phenotype was located in the chromosome approximately 1.2 kb and 1.6 kb, respectively, upstream from the phbA-phbB genes, as illustrated on FIG. 3. For strain PHB #19, the Tn5 insertion was located elsewhere on the A. eutrophus chromosome.
The experimental procedure and materials used in the isolation and characterization of phbC were as follows. The procedures and materials are similar to those described for isolation of the phbA and phbB genes.
Bacterial strains and plasmids are shown in Table 1. Media and culture conditions are as decribed above.
TABLE 1______________________________________Bacterial Strains and Plasmids. RelevantStrain Characteristics Reference______________________________________E. coliJM83DH5α Host strain for plasmids BRLA. eutrophusH16 Wild type strain ATCC1769911599 -- NCIB 1159911599S1 StreprPHB#2 ##STR1##PHB#3 ##STR2##PHB#19 ##STR3##PlasmidspAeT29 ##STR4##pAeT10 ##STR5##pLAFR3 Tcr, cosmid vector B. StaskawiczpRK2013 NmrpRK602 Cmr, Nmr, pRK2013 nm::Tn9 containing Tn5pUC18 AprpUC19 Apr______________________________________
DNA manipulations were similar to those described above. Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase and DNA polymerase 1 were obtained from New England Biolabs and used as directed by the manufacturer. Calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Corporation. All routine DNA manipulations, including plasmid purifications, E. coli transformations, etc. were performed using methods described by Maniatis, et al. Chromosomal DNA was purified from A. eutrophus strains, grown to late logarithmic phase in TSB as described previously. Transfer of restriction digested DNA samples from agarose gels to nitrocellulose filters, prehybridization and hybridization with 32 P-labelled DNA probes was as previously described. Rapid plasmid isolation from A. eutrophus recombinant strains, for restriction analysis, was performed by the alkaline extraction procedure.
The conjugal transfer of the broad host range plasmid, pLAFR3, or recombinant derivatives of pLAFR3, into A. eutrophus was performed using the same method as previously described. In this case, however, the recipient A. eutrophus cells were not sonicated and transconjugants were selected on A. eutrophus mineral agar plates containing 0.01% NH4 Cl as nitrogen source, 1% (w/v) fructose as carbon source and 10 μg/ml tetracycline.
For Tn5 mutagenesis, a spontaneous streptomycin resistant strain of A. eutrophus 11599 (1599 S1) was used. Transfer of pRK602 (Tn5) was carried out as described above using E. coli MM294A (pRK602) as the only donor. A. eutrophus strains containing Tn5 were selected for by growth on streptomycin (500 μg/ml) and kanamycin (100 μg/ml).
The amplification and screening procedures described by Schlegel and Oeding, Radiation and Radioisotopes for Industrial Microorganisms. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 223-231 (1971) was used to identify PHB-deficient strains of A. eutrophus. A pool of around 105 Kanr transconjugants (Tn5 insertion mutants) was inoculated into 10 ml of mineral media containing 0.01% NH4 Cl, 1% fructose and 100 μg/ml kanamycin and incubated for 18 h at 30° C. This culture was then used to inoculate 100 ml of the same medium and incubated for 30 h at 30° C. To amplify PHB-deficient mutants, aliquots of this culture containing approximately 109 cells were fractionated on sucrose step gradients by density equilibrium centrifugation and plated out on mineral agar plates containing 0.01% NH4 Cl, 1% fructose and 100 μg/ml kanamycin. After growth for 4-5 days at 30° C., opaque (PHB-deficient) and white (PHB-containing) colonies were readily distinguished. By quantitating the level of PHB produced by both opaque and white colonies, it was confirmed that opaque colonies were PHB-deficient whereas white colonies contained PHB.
In order to perform assays for β-ketothiolase, NADPH-linked acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB-polymerase, 100 ml cultures of A. eutrophus strains were grown at 30° C. for 40 hours in TSB. For Tn5 mutant strains, kanamycin was added at 100 μg/ml and for strains containing pLAFR3 or derivatives thereof, tetracycline was added to 10 μg/ml. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 2 ml lysis buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.0; 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 5 mM EDTA, 0.02 mM phenyl-methyl-sulfonyl-fluoride; 10% v/v glycerol) and lysed by sonication. An aliquot of the lysate was cleared of cell debris by centrifugation for β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase assays. β-ketothiolase activity was determined by measuring the rate of thiolysis of acetoacetyl-CoA as described by Davis, et al., J. Biol.Chem. 262,82-89 (1987), of acetoacetyl-CoA with NADPH as the cofactor. PHB polymerase assays were performed using samples of the crude lysate and determining the level of incorporation of D-3 H-hydroxybutyryl-CoA (specific activity approximately 2 μCi/μmol), as described by Fukui, et al., Arch. Microbiol. 110, 149-156 (1976). Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford, Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254 (1976), using Biorad assay solution and bovine serum albumin as the standard. E. coli maxi-cell labelling studies were performed as described by Sancar, et al., J.Bacteriol. 137, 692-693 (1979).
To determine the level of PHB in different strains, 100 μl aliquots of the crude lysates were treated with 1.2 ml of 5% Na hypochlorite solution for 1 h at 37° C. The insoluble PHB was then harvested by centrifugation for 10 min in a microcentrifuge, washed successively with 1 ml of H2 O, 1 ml acetone, 1 ml of ethanol and dried under vacuum. PHB concentrations were then determined spectrophotometrically as described by Law and Slepecky, J.Bacteriol. 82, 33-36 (1961) using a standard curve and expressed as mg PHB/mg protein.
Plasmids pLA29, pLA40, pLA41 and pLA42 were constructed by cloning restriction fragments of the pAeT29 insert into the broad host range vector pLAFR3 for complementation analysis of the PHB-negative A. eutrophus strains. pLAFR3 is a derivative of pLAFR1, described by Friedman, et al., Gene 18, 289-296 (1982), containing a pUC8 polylinker cloning site inserted into the EcoR1 site. Different fragments of pAeT9 were cloned into pLAFR3. pLA29 was constructed by ligating the entire 15 kb EcoR1 insert from pAeT29 into the EcoR1 site of pLAFR3. To facilitate the construction of pLA40, pLA41 and pLA42, the corresponding fragments were first cloned into pUC18 to produce plasmids pAeT40, pAeT41 and pAeT42. The fragments were then excised by digestion with BamHI and EcoR1 from the pUC18 plasmids, purified following agarose gel electrophoresis and ligated into BamH1/HindIII digested pLAFR3. To construct pAeT40, pAeT29 DNA was digested to completion with Nde1 and the cohesive ends filled in using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase. After separating the fragments on an agarose gel, the 7 kb fragment of interest was purified by electroelution, ligated into the Sma1 site of pUC18 and the recombinant plasmid pAeT40 subsequently identified by restriction analysis after transforming E. coli DH5αcells. This construction eliminates the acetoacetyl-CoA reductase activity since one of the Nde1 sites is located within the structural gene for this enzyme. For the construction of pAeT41, Sma1/EcoR1 digested pAeT29 DNA was separated on an agarose gel and the 5 kb Sma1/EcoR1 fragment purified and ligated into Sma1/EcoR1 digested pUC18 to give the correct plasmid. Deletion of the 2.3 kb Pst1 fragment containing the β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase structural genes by partial Pst1 digestion of pAeT41 DNA and religation was used to construct pAeT42.
A library of 105 individual Tn5 insertion mutants of A. eutrophus 11599 S1 was constructed and 32 potentially PHB-negative colonies, identified by their opaque colony phenotype on nitrogen limited minimal plates, as described above. These were further characterized using Southern DNA hybridization analysis. For the DNA hybridization studies restriction digested chromosomal DNA from each strain was analyzed using both a Tn5 DNA probe (plasmid pRK602) and two plasmids, pAeT10 and pAeT29 which contain the A. eutrophus phbA-phbB locus (FIG. 3).
The 32 "opaque" strains represented multiple copies of only three distinct mutant types. These three distinct mutant types are represented by strains PHB #2, PHB #3 and PHB #19. For strains PHB #2 and PHB #3, the transposon Tn5 is inserted into chromosomal Pst1 fragments of 2.3 kb and 0.6 kb, respectively. Both of these chromosomal Pst1 fragments are located on the 15 kb of A. eutrophus DNA cloned in plasmid pAeT29, but not in the phbA-phbB structural genes. Strain PHB #19 has Tn5 inserted into a Pst1 fragment, not present on the pAeT29 plasmid.
More detailed DNA hybridization experiments were performed on the chromosomal DNA from strain PHB #2 and strain PHB #3 to map the site of the Tn5 insertion in each of these mutants. Chromosomal DNA from each of these strains as well as the wild type strain H16 and strain PHB #19 was digested with Sa11, Sma1 and Bg1II, transferred bidirectionally to nitrocellulose filters and hybridized with Tn5 DNA (pRK602) and pAeT29 DNA probes to map the location of the Tn5 insertions in strains PHB #2 and PHB #3.
The results of a biochemical analysis of wild type H16 and each of the mutuant strains PHB #2, PHB #3, and PHB #19 is presented in Table 2. 100 ml stationary phase cultures of each strain were harvested, lysed and assayed for PHB content and β-ketothiolase, NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHB polymerase activities. Under these growth conditions wild type H16 produces a significant level of PHB (1.3 mg PHB/mg protein, Table 2) and has a high level of all three enzyme activities. Mutant strains PHB #2 and PHB #3 produce essentially no PHB and strain PHB #19 produces only 50% of the wild type level (Table 2). PHB polymerase activity could not be detected in any of these mutant strains, however, the presence of PHB in the lysate of strain PHB #19 indicates that the enzyme is there although the activity is probably below the detection level of the assay. β-ketothiolase activities in all three mutants are reduced to the order of 45% (PHB #2) to 38% (PHB #19) that of wild type strain H16. Similarly, NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase activities are around 50% of the wild type level. It was concluded from these data that the PHB-polymerase gene was located upstream from phbA-phbB and that the expression of the latter genes is affected by the Tn5 insertion upstream in the case of strains PHB #2 and PHB #3.
A series of plasmids containing fragments of the A. eutrophus insert of plasmid pAeT29 were constructed in the broad host range vector pLAFR3 for complementation analysis of the PHB-negative mutants.
Each of the recombinant plasmids, pLA29, pLA40, pLA41 and pLA42 were introduced into each of the A. eutrophus strains by conjugation and the resulting transconjugants analyzed on nitrogen limited plates for the restoration of the white (PHB plus) phenotype. Plasmids pLA29, pLA40, pLA41 and pLA42, each of which contains the region upstream from phbA-phbB into which Tn5 has inserted in the chromosome of strains PHB #2 and PHB #3, complemented the mutation in each of these two strains, restoring the white colony phenotype. All four recombinant plasmids also restored the wild type colony phenotype to mutant strain PHB #19. In the case of this strain, the Tn5 insertion is located outside the region of the A. eutrophus chromosome contained in each of the plasmids. Control experiments using the vector pLAFR3 resulted in the opaque colony phenotype when introduced into each of the three mutant strains.
Biochemical analysis of each of the complemented strains was performed as described for the characterization of the mutants and these results are also presented in Table 2. The introduction of pLA29 into each of the mutant strains results in the restoration of PHB polymerase activity and PHB biosynthesis (Table 2). In addition, an approximately three to five-fold increase in the levels of β-ketothiolase and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase activities was observed. Plasmid pLA40 and pLA41 also restore PHB-polymerase and PHB production to strains PHB #2 (Table 2), PHB #3 and PHB #19, although in the case of pLA40, the phbB gene was disrupted during the construction of this plasmid. Finally, plasmid pLA42 restores PHB polymerase activity and PHB production to all three mutant strains although the phbA-phbB genes have been deleted. In the case of strains containing this plasmid the β-ketothiolase and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase activities remain at the same level as the mutant strains (Table 2).
TABLE 2______________________________________Biochemical analysis of mutant andcomplemented A. eutrophus H16 strains. Polymer- Thio- Reduc- ase3Strain PHB1 lase2 tase2 (× 103)______________________________________H16 1.3 8.9 1.0 3.9PHB#2 <0.01 4.0 0.5 NDPHB#3 <0.01 3.4 0.5 NDTn5#19 0.6 3.2 0.4 NDH16/pLA29 1.0 28.7 9.2 5.3PHB#2/pLA29 1.5 27.5 3.5 3.8PHB#3/pLA29 0.9 24.8 4.4 0.7PHB#19/pLA29 1.8 26.7 4.9 1.0PHB#2/pLA40 0.9 20.4 0.45 0.6PHB#2/pLA41 18.0 3.7 0.9PHB#2/pLA42 1.2 2.0 0.3 4.3PHB#3/pLA42 0.9 5.5 0.5 0.6PHB#19/pLA42 1.2 5.5 0.4 0.6______________________________________ 1 mg/mg of protein 2 units/mg of protein 3 cpm/min/mg of protein ND: no detectable activity Results shown are the average of two or more experiments.
As described above, the phbA-phbB genes located on plasmid pAeT29 were expressed in E. coli under the control of the A. eutrophus promoter. Identification of the phbC gene upstream from phbA-phbB together with the observed decrease in thiolase and reductase enzyme activities in strains PHB #2 and PHB #3 indicates that all three genes are expressed from a single promoter located upstream from phbC. To study this, cultures of E. coli strains containing plasmids pAeT41 and pAeT42 were grown under nitrogen limiting conditions until cells reached stationary phase at which point the cells were harvested, lysed and analyzed. E. coli containing pUC18 was used as a control. The results of β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, PHB polymerase and PHB concentration assays, shown in Table 3, indicate that the lysate of E. coli containing plasmid pAeT41 has a significant level of each enzyme activity and PHB production.
Maxi-cell analysis of the E. coli strains described above was used to determine the molecular weight of the polypeptides encoded by plasmids pAeT41 and pAeT42. Plasmid pAeT10 was included in the analysis as this plasmid expresses the A. eutrophus phbA-phbB genes from the pUC8 vector lacZ promoter. Additional protein bands are present of Mr 40,000 and Mr 26,000 in samples containing plasmid pAeT10 and pAeT41, respectively. Both of these plasmids express the phbA-phbB genes encoding β-ketothiolase (Mr 41,000) and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase (Mr 26,000). Neither of these two proteins is present in the extract of cells containing plasmid pAeT42 which does not contain the phbA-phbB genes. Control experiments in which the vector pUC8 was used gave no signal at Mr 41,000 or Mr 26,000. Both plasmids, pAeT41 and pAeT42, express the PHB polymerase (phbC) gene in E. coli, and in samples which contain extracts of cells containing these plasmids a signal at Mr 58,000 is clearly evident. Again, this protein is absent from sample which contains the extract from cells containing plasmid pAeT10 which does not contain the phbC gene and also from a control sample of pUC8 containing cells. An additional band of around Mr 30,000 is present in all samples and was also found in control experiments of cell extracts containing pUC8 and is presumably a vector protein. From these data we conclude that the phbC gene expressed in E. coli encodes a polypeptide of approximately Mr 58,000.
TABLE 3______________________________________Biochemical analysis of recombinant E. colistrains to determine expression of phbC-A-B in E. coli. Thiolase Reductase Polymerase PHB U/mg U/mg cpm/min/mg mg/mgPlasmid Protein Protein Protein Protein______________________________________pUC18 0.5 ND ND 0.015pAeT41 59.0 2.5 2.4 × 104 2.977pAeT42 0.9 ND 0.02 × 104 0.011______________________________________ ND: no detectable activity Results shown are the average of two or more experiments.
The 2 kb Sma1-Pst1 A. eutrophus Chromosomal DNA fragment cloned in plasmid pAeT42 contains the entire structural gene for phbC and probably the regulatory sequences. This fragment was sequenced from both DNA strands multiple times using the dideoxy sequencing method as described above. A single long open reading frame extends from nucleotide 820 to a TGA stop codon at nucleotide 2608. Potential translation initiation codons are present at position 842 (ATG), 1067 (ATG) and 1097 (ATG). Translation from each of these potential start sites would produce proteins of Mr 63,940, Mr 55,513 and Mr 54,483, respectively. Significant amino acid sequence homology between the translation product from the ATG at position 842 to the ATG at position 1067 and the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene product, described below, indicates that the first ATG (position 842) is probably correct. FIG. 4 presents the entire nucleotide sequence of this region from the Sma1 site to the first 30 nucleotides of the phbA gene located downstream. The translation product of the open reading frame from the ATG at position 842 to the TGA at position 2609 is also shown. The PHB polymerase encoded by the phbC gene in plasmid pAeT42 is a polypeptide of 589 amino acids with an Mr=63,940. The N-terminal 10 amino acids of the phbA gene product are also presented in FIG. 4. Additional features of the nucleotide sequence presented in FIG. 4 include the C-terminus of an open reading frame which begins upstream from the Sma1 site and terminates at the TGA stop codon at position 76. Located 85 bp downstream from the phbC TGA stop codon (position 2609) lies the ATG start codon for the phbA structural gene (position 2969). From these data it is clear that the three enzymes of the A. eutrophus PHB biosynthetic pathway are encoded by three genes organized as phbC-phbA-phbB as illustrated in FIG. 4.
The expression of phbC alone in E. coli produces neither PHB nor significant levels of PHB polymerase activity (plasmid pAeT42). E. coli appears incapable of synthesizing D-(-)-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, as substrate for PHB polymerase, in the absence of the A. eutrophus phbA-phbB genes. Since the insert of pAeT42 contains both the promoter and structural gene for phbC (plasmid pLA42 complements all PHB-negative mutants, Table 2), it can be concluded that in the absence of available substrate, PHB polymerase is inactive or degraded in E. coli.
The nucleotide sequence of the A. eutrophus chromosomal DNA insert in plasmid pLA42 encoding PHB polymerase predicts a single polypeptide of Mr 63,940 (FIG. 4). Although PHB polymerase has not previously been purified and characterized, the results of E. coli maxi-cell studies indicate a Mr=58,000 for this polypeptide, in reasonable agreement with that predicted from the gene sequence.
For a number of years, it was proposed that the polymerization of (D)-β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA involves a membrane bound polymerase which forms a type of barrier between the aqueous environment of the cytoplasm and the hydrophobic crystalline PHB granules. The hydropathy profile of the PHB polymerase polypeptide does not indicate a typical membrane spanning structure. In addition, NMR studies of native PHB granules in Methylobacterius indicate that these granules are in a mobile, as opposed to a highly crystalline solid state. Together these data lend credence to the idea that PHB biosynthesis does not in fact require a complex membrane bound polymerization system. The mechanism for PHB polymerase proposed in the literature involves two partial reactions. The initial acyl-S-enzyme intermediate formation is followed by transfer to a primer acceptor in the second reaction. The predicted primary structure of PHB polymerase has 5 cysteine residues, Cys246, Cys319, Cys382, Cys438 and Cys459.
The genes involved in the biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) polyesters in Pseudomonas oleovorans were also isolated, as follows.
In 1983, de Smet, et al. J. Bacteriol. 154,870-878, identified a polymer produced by Pseudomonas oleovorans TF4-1L (ATCC 29347) as poly-B-hydroxyoctanoate. Subsequent studies showed that P. oleovorans could produce a range of PHA biopolymers depending on the carbon source used, i.e., n-alkanes and l-alkenes (Lageveen, et al., Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54,2924-2932 (1988)) or fatty acids (Brandl, et al., App. Environ. Microbiol. 54,1977-1982 (1988). The pathway appears to involve the conversion of the alkanes/alkenes to the fatty acid which then enters the fatty acid B-oxidation pathway, resulting in the formation of the D isomer of the B-hydroxyacyl-CoA, which is incorporated into the polymer by PHA polymerase. P. oleovorans has not been shown to incorporate B-hydroxybutyrate indicating that 1) it does not possess the thiolase/reductase enzymes, or 2) the PHA polymerase cannot use B-hydroxybutyrate as a substrate. The broad range of substrates used by the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase make the gene encoding this enzyme particularly interesting for biopolymer engineering of polyesters.
The approach used for isolating the A. eutrophus B-ketothiolase and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase using the Z. ramigera B-ketothiolase gene as a DNA hybridization probe was followed, as described above, to isolate the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene. Southern DNA hybridization of P. oleovorans chromosomal DNA identified a 6 kb EcoR1 restriction fragment with strong homology to the A. eutrophus PHB polymerase gene (phbC). The 6 kb EcoR1 fragment was cloned in the E. coli plasmid vector, pUC18, by standard procedures to give plasmid pP023. The region which hybridized to the A. eutrophus phbC gene is located as indicated on FIG. 5. Nucleotide sequence analysis of the complete 6 kb fragment identified three potential protein coding regions (open reading frames, ORF1, ORF2 and ORF3, indicated on FIG. 5). ORF1 begins at the ATG initiation codon nucleotide 554 and ends at the TGA stop codon nucleotide 2231 (FIG. 6). This open reading frame is contained in the region of the pP023 insert which hybridizes with the A. eutrophus phbC gene. ORF1 encodes a polypeptide of 562 amino acids with an Mr =60,000. A comparison of the protein sequence predicted by translation of ORF1 with the amino acid sequence of the A. eutrophus PHB polymerase using the program ALIGN revealed 52% identity between the two proteins. These data identify ORF1 as the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene. ORF2 begins at the ATG position 2297 and ends at the TAA position 3146. ORF3 begins at the ATG position 3217 and ends at the TGA position 4948. ORF2 and ORF3 are probably cotranscribed with the PHA polymerase gene (ORF1) and are probably proteins involved in PHA biosynthesis.
It was established above that it is possible to construct new PHB production strains by introducing the A. eutrophus PHB biosynthetic genes into E. coli resulting in the accumulation of up to 50% dry cell weight as PHB. The construction of new or improved polyester production strains is now possible by the expression of either the PHB biosynthetic genes from A. eutrophus or the PHA polymerase gene and ORF2 and ORF3 from P. oleovorans in a number of systems. Plasmids can be constructed which express the A. eutrophus B-ketothiolase and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase genes in P. oleovorans under the control of the xylS promoter in the broad host range expression plasmids pNM185 (Mermod, et al. J.Bacteriol. 167, 447-454 (1986), or pERD20/pERD21 (Ramos, et al, FEBS LETTERS 226, 241-246 (1986). Alternatively, the broad host range tac promoter expression vectors pMMB24/pMMB22 (Bagdasarian, et al, Gene 26, 273-282 (1983)). These same vectors can also be used to express the A. eutrophus PHB polymerase gene or the three P. oleovarans genes cloned in plasmid pP023 (FIG. 5).
Two plasmids, pLAP1 and pLAP2, have been constructed which should express the P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene and ORF2 (pLAP1) or the PHA polymerase gene and ORF2 plus ORF3 (pLAP2) under the control of the A. eutrophus phbC promoter (FIG. 4).
To construct these plasmids, the 810 bp Sma 1-BstB 1 restriction fragment spanning the first 810 nucleotides of the A. eutrophus insert in plasmid pAeT42 containing the phbC promoter was ligated into the unique Sma 1 site in the E. coli vector pUC19 to obtain plasmid pAeTB1. The P. oleovorans PHA polymerase gene promoter was removed by using the exonuclease Bal31 to delete 170 bp from the end of Fsp1 digested pP023 DNA and recovering the PHA polymerase structural gene plus ORF2 by subsequently digesting with Cla1, and cloning the fragment into Sma1/Cla1 digested pBLSK+vector (Stratagene, La Jolla Calif. 92037). The insert of pPOB10 was identified as containing the last 19 bp upstream from the ATG start codon of the PHA polymerase structural gene (nucleotide 535, FIG. 62) the complete PHA polymerase structural gene and ORF2. The structural gene and ORF2 could then be recovered on a 2.6 kb BamH1- Xho1 fragment and ligated into BamH1/ Sal1 digested pAeTB1 to obtain plasmid pAeP1. The entire insert of pAeP1 containing the phbC promoter -PHA polymerase structural gene - ORF2 construct was then excised as a 3.4 EcoR1 - Hind111 fragment and cloned into the polylinker region of the broad host range vector pLAFR3 for conjugation into A. eutrophus strains. To construct pAeP2, the 2.6 kb BamH1 - Cla1 fragment from pPOB10 and the 2.5 kb Cla1 - Xho1 fragment from pP023, containing ORF3(FIG. 66), were ligated with BamH1/Sa11 digested pAeTB1 to obtain pAeP2. Again the phbC - PHA polymerase - ORF2 - ORF3 construct could be excised as a 5.9 kb EcoR1- HindIII fragment and cloned into the polylinker region of pLAFR3 to obtain pLAP2. pLAP1 should express both the PHA polymerase and ORF2 in A. eutrophus and pLAP2 should in addition express ORF3. If the genes are not expressed, they can be inserted into the broad host range expression vectors described above for the B-ketothiolase and NADP-specific acetoacetyl-CoA reductase genes.
The PHB polymerase and PHA polymerase genes should prove invaluable for the production of PHA polymers in bacterial and plant systems. However, the cloned and characterized genes can be further modified by constructing fusions of the two polymerases or by chemical mutagenesis. Functional polymerase enzymes could then be selected in an appropriate organism by the accumulation of polymer detectable by phenotypic appearance or increased density. This is a straightforward approach to altering the enzyme's specificity to create novel polymerases.
After isolation and characterization of the polymer genes and gene products from a variety of organisms, as demonstrated for Z. ramigera, A. eutrophus, N. salmonicolor, and P. oleovorans, a means for controlling the expression of the gene products can be established. Overproduction of the Zoogloea thiolase gene was demonstrated by the studies used to define the transcription start site and promoter of the Z. ramigera. Overproduction enables the purification of the enzymes to homogeneity and provides reagent type quantities for analysis and comparison of substrate specificieties. In addition, the purified enzymes can be used to synthesize stereospecific substrates for in vitro polymer synthesis. Further, once the transcriptional regulatory mechanism responsible for polymer overproduction is elucidated under a variety of environmental conditions, in vitro systems for the enzymatic synthesis of known polymers, and novel polymers, can be developed to provide new materials. The new materials are then analyzed for chemical composition, molecular weight and rheological characteristics so that maximum utilization can be made of the polymers.
An overproduction system for the Z. ramigera thiolase in E. coli was constructed using the synthetic tac promoter to produce a series of thiolase expression plasmids, the optimum construct in induced in E. coli cells yielding about 20-30% of the total soluble cell protein as thiolase. This method yields thiolase in reagent type quantities, an average of 150 mg of pure thiolase from 1 liter of culture.
There are essentially two conditions where gene regulation in Z. ramigera and A. eutrophus may be expected to occur: when carbon starved cells under nutrient limiting conditions are subsequently presented with a carbon source and when cells grown under nutrient limiting conditions have accumulated large amounts of PHB and the nutrient limitation is removed, resulting in PHB degradation.
Transcriptional regulation of the polymer biosynthetic genes is determined as follows. Cultures grown under various conditions are harvested both for enzyme assays (thiolase, reductase and synthetase) and for RNA purification. RNA samples are analyzed in a series of Northern hybridization experiments using the cloned genes as probes. Useful RNA hybridization methodology includes glyoxylation of RNA (McMaster and Carmichael, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74, 4835 (1977)); formaldehyde/agarose gel electrophoresis (Lehrach et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 16, 4743 (1977)); transfer to nitrocellulose or nylon filters (Thomas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 5201 (1980)); and hybridization with DNA probes labelled with 32 P by nick translation (Rigby et al., J. Mol. Biol. 113, 237 (1977)). DNA probes are prepared from clones pUCDBKl (Z. ramigera); and pAeT3 (A. eutrophus). One result of these studies is the establishment of the operon organization of the genes and the length of the mRNA.
The levels of each of the biosynthetic enzymes are manipulated and the effect this has on polymer synthesis monitored. It is necessary to determine the rate-limiting enzyme(s) in the biosynthetic pathway so that one can increase flux through the pathway by overproducing the rate-limiting enzyme(s); the effect overproduction of each enzyme has on the incorporation of different monomeric units, i.e., the ratio of PHB:PHV in the copolymer produced by A. eutrophuswhen grown on butyrate; and the result of expression of the genes from one species in other species, for example, the expression of Zoogloea genes in A. eutrophus, and vice versa, as well as other isolated and characterized heterologous genes from other organisms, e.g., Nocardia and P. oleovorans in Zoogloea and A. eutrophus.
To accomplish overproduction of polymer biosynthetic genes in multiple host organisms, one must use broad host range expression vectors which function in these bacteria. In one instance, enzyme overproduction via gene dosage is carried out. For example, the entire pUCDBKl insert containing the promoter region can be cloned into the vector pSUP104 (Simon et al., Molecular Genetics of the Bacteria-Plant Interaction, A. Pobler, ed. (Spring-Verlag, NY 1983) and used to transform Z. ramigera I-16-M. The extent of overproduction of each enzyme is monitored by enzyme assays. A similar approach can be taken for any number of other genes; for example, thiolase; thiolase and reductase; reductase; reductase and synthetase, etc. Secondly, genes can be placed under the transcriptional control of high efficiency promoters, i.e., tac (Gill et al., J. Bact. 167, 611-615 (1986) and tol (Mermod et al., J. Bact. 167, 447-454 (1986). In this case, the constructs are conjugated into mutants defective in the corresponding gene. The expression of the polymer biosynthetic gene or genes of interest can then be tightly regulated, as determined using enzyme assays to monitor the level of overproduction. As each construct is tested, one can begin to monitor the effect on polymer synthesis in a routine manner i.e., the rate and level of synthesis.
Factors which determine the molecular weight of the PHB or PHA produced by different bacteria can be eludicated by analysing the molecular weight distribution of the polymers produced by various bacteria. There is little doubt that a number of PHB-producing microorganisms have the ability to incorporate monomers other than D(-)-hydroxybutyrate into the polymer chain. For the PHB-PHV copolymer produced by A. eutrophus, it has been proposed that propionate is first converted to propionyl-CoA which then acts as a substrate for beta-ketothiolase. The high yields of pure enzymes available from overproduction systems is necessary to determine the range of alternate substrates which each of the three PHB-biosynthetic enzymes can utilize and the types of new PHB-like polymers that can be synthesized in an in vitro system where the available substrates can be strictly controlled.
Although the thiolase and reductase enzymes are an essential part of the biosynthesis of PHB and PHB-like polymers, it is the PHB polymerase which ultimately defines the new types of polymer which can be made. This is facilitated by the development of an in vitro system using the enzyme to test a whole range of substrates, many of which cannot enter the cell and therefore cannot be tested for incorporation into PHB by a fermentation process.
Overproduction and purification of more than one reductase enzyme provides a means for comparing the kinetics and specificity of the enzymes. The Zoogloea reductase has been reported to be NADP-specific, however, the A. eutrophus enzyme apparently will use either NAD or NADP. The stereospecificity of this enzyme may make it a useful reagent for the synthesis of D-substrates for PHB polymerase studies. Among the acetoacetyl derivatives to be tested are the oxoester of CoA and oxopantetheine pivaloate (OPP) and the methylene analogs. The ketone but not the oxoester of the methylene analogs is cleaved by Zoologea thiolase.
Various longer chain alkyl derivatives, in particular the C5 -C8 linear 3-oxo thiolesters, oxoesters and methylene ketones, may also be useful as substrates for the PHB polymerase, given the existence of C5 -C8 -beta-hydroxyalkanoates in B. megaterium, as well as olefins, alcohols and epoxides.
In crude extracts of Z. ramigera, D-beta-hydroxybutyryl CoA, but not L-hydroxybutyryl CoA, is a substrate for PHB polymerase. It is expected that other D-hydroxyacyl CoA species can utilize alternate substrates or cosubstrates such as D-beta-hydroxyvaleryl CoA (HV-CoA). [2-3 H]HB-CoA and beta[3-14 C]-HV-CoA, each readily preparable by enzymic or chemical synthesis, can be used as substrates and to monitor 3 H and 14 C content and ratios in polymers precipitated or separated by gel filtration. It is predicted that block copolymer regions, e.g., (HB)500 (HV)1000 (HB)500, can be constructed by careful control of substrate ratios, and leaving groups in elongation phase, e.g., HB-oxo-CoA and HV-S-CoA monomers.
Additional alternate substrates can be tested including branched chain beta-hydroxyacyl CoAs. Testing cannot be done in whole cells since such compounds are not normally transporte into the cells. Alternate substrates can be tested for inhibition of normal [14 C]-PHB formation first by incorporation of soluble [14 C]-HBCoA into insoluble polymer, then as copolymerization cosubstrates and finally for homopolymerization. Alternate substrates can be assayed for Km, Vmax relative to HB-CoA and for polymer size determined by calibrated gel filtration studies.
PHB is produced and stored in bacteria when they are grown under nutrient limiting conditions, usually nitrogen-limiting conditions (for example, 0.1% nitrogen, depending on the species), although culturing the bacteria under conditions providing limited oxygen, phosphate, or other non-carbon nutrient source will also induce PHB synthesis and storage. For example, Azotobacter beijerinckii, a nitrogen fixing bacteria accumulates up to 70% dry cell weight as PHB when grown on glucose/ammonium salts under limiting oxygen. Increasing the available oxygen leads to a decrease in PHB synthesis and a concomittant reduction in the levels of two of the biosynthetic enzymes. The reduction in enzyme levels is indicative of a regulatory mechanism(s) operating at the genetic level. Nitrogen limitation of the growth of Alcaligenes eutrophus results in yields of up to 80% dry cell weight PHB. Similarly, Halobacterium and Pseudomonas sp. increase PHB production under nitrogen limitation.
Under non-limiting conditions, the PHB in organisms that normally produce the PHB is rapidly degraded by degradative enzymes. It is possible to mutate these organisms such that the degradative enzymes are inactive or deleted, hence PHB accumulated during limiting conditions of growth cannot be degraded under non-limiting conditions. In order for these bacteria to resume growth, the PHB will be excreted into the medium. Alternatively, it is possible to introduce the requisite enzymes into an organism which does not metabolize PHB (biosynthesis or degradation), enabling that organism to accumulate large quantities of PHB under limiting conditions, and when conditions are changed to non-limiting, the organism should release the PHB into the medium.
By cycling the limiting and non-limiting conditions, it is possible to accumulate the maximum amount of PHB (based on absorbance of the bacteria, which increases as a function of polymer content), then release the accumulated polymer into the medium by changing the conditions to non-limiting conditions which stimulate replication of the bacteria. The organisms can be cultured in conventional fermentation systems for continuous removal of the polymer containing medium without disruption of the bacteria.
As described above with reference to bacterial expression systems, the genes encoding the thiolase, reductase, and/or the polymerase for PHB or PHA can be expressed in plants of a variety of species to produce the desired polymeric product. The advantages of such a system are immediately apparent, decreasing dependence on petroleum-based plastics, and creating an economically useful crop for plants which can grow on a variety of soils.
The first requirement for plant genetic engineering is a system to deliver the foreign DNA to plant tissue. The most popular vectors at this time are the tumour-inducing (Ti) plasmids of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, using this bacterium as the agent to deliver DNA by infection. Plant DNA viruses can also be used as vectors, such as vectors based upon the cauliflower mosaic viruses or the Gemini virus vectors. There are also a number of methods of direct gene transfer to plant cells, including chemically stimulated DNA uptake by protoplasts, electroporation, electroinjection of intact plant cells, liposome-mediated transformation of protoplasts, and DNA transformation by direct injection into plants. Chemically stimulated uptake involves incubating protoplasts with donor and carrier DNA in the presence of 13% (w/v) polyethylene glycol in 40 mM CaCl2. Post-incubation is carried out whereby the PEG concentrationis gradually lowered as the CaCl2 concentration is gradually raised. Electroporation is the process whereby electrical pulses of high field strength are used to reversibly permeabilize cell membranes to facilitate uptake of large molecules, including DNA. Electroinjection and direct injection have the advantage that they do not require formation of protoplasts first. These methods are known to those skilled in the art. See, for example, the review by C. P. Lichtenstein and S. L. Fuller, "Vectors for the genetic engineering of plants", Genetic Engineering, ed. P. W. J. Rigby, vol. 6, 104-171 (Academic Press Ltd. 1987).
The genes can be introduced into the cytoplasm, mitrochondria, or chloroplast, either directly or using targeting sequences. Vectors and targeting sequences and promoters for plants are known to those skilled in the art and are commercially available from Pharmacia-LKB Biotechnology, 800 Centennial Ave., Piscataway, N.J. 08854-9932, and Stragene, La Jolla, Calif.
Any type of plant which produces a useful carbon substrate can be engineered for polymer production. As used with reference to production of polymers in plants, "polymer" includes PHB, PHA, and novel carbon-based polymers synthesized from fatty acids using the disclosed polymerases. If the plant does not form the appropriate fatty acids, the thiolase and reductase genes can be introduced into the plant along with one or more polymerases. The A. eutrophus polymerase polymerizes C4 and C5 substrates. The P. oleovarans polymerase acts on longer substrates, such as C6 to C18 fatty acids, but not short chain fatty acids. The plants can also be modified, preferably by mutagenesis, to block the glycerol ester and fatty acid degradation pathways so that the plant forms the appropriate substrate.
The genes can be introduced into any type of plant. Cereal plants are preferred, such as corn, wheat and rice, since they are widely grown and their genetic systems are well characterized. Other useful agronomic plants include tobacco and high oil seed plants, especially those varieties which grow in desert or in mineralized soil.
The genes can also be introduced into plant cell culture systems, many of which are known to those skilled in the art. Cell culture of a variety of cereal and other agricultural crops is described in detail in Handbook of Plant Cell Culture vol. 4 edited by D. A. Evans, W. R. Sharp, and P. V. Ammirato (Macmillan Publishing Co. N.Y. 1986). A specific example of a plant system in which much genetic work has been conducted is Arabidopsis thaliana. Polymer production in cell culture can be manipulated not only by introduction of the cloned genes but also be variation in substrates and culture conditions, as described with reference to production in bacteria.
Modifications and variations of the present invention, a method for making polyhydroxybutyrate and polyhydroxybutyrate-like polymers having carbon-carbon backbones using recombinant engineering according to the foregoing detailed description, and the resulting polymers, will be obvious to those skilled in the art. Such variations and modifications are intended to come within the scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4477654 *||Jun 29, 1982||Oct 16, 1984||Imperial Chemical Industries Plc||3-Hydroxybutyrate polymers|
|1||*||Bernt and Schlegel, Arch. Microbiol., 103, 21 30 (1975).|
|2||Bernt and Schlegel, Arch. Microbiol., 103, 21-30 (1975).|
|3||*||Fukui et al., Arch Microbiol., 110, 149 156 (1976).|
|4||Fukui et al., Arch Microbiol., 110, 149-156 (1976).|
|5||*||Fukui, et al. Biochim Biophys. Acta 917, 365 371 (1987).|
|6||Fukui, et al. Biochim Biophys. Acta 917, 365-371 (1987).|
|7||*||Griebel and Merrick, J. Bacteriol., 108, 782 789 (1971).|
|8||Griebel and Merrick, J. Bacteriol., 108, 782-789 (1971).|
|9||*||Nishimura et al., Arch Microbiol., 116, 21 27 (1978).|
|10||Nishimura et al., Arch Microbiol., 116, 21-27 (1978).|
|11||*||Oeding and Schlegel, Biochem. J., 134, 239 248 (1973).|
|12||Oeding and Schlegel, Biochem. J., 134, 239-248 (1973).|
|13||*||Peter Schubert, et al., J. Bacteriol. 170 (12), 5837 5847 (Dec. 1988).|
|14||Peter Schubert, et al., J. Bacteriol. 170 (12), 5837-5847 (Dec. 1988).|
|15||*||Saito et al., Arch. Microbiol., 114, 211 217 (1977).|
|16||Saito et al., Arch. Microbiol., 114, 211-217 (1977).|
|17||*||Senior and Dawes, Biochem. J., 134, 225 238 (1973).|
|18||Senior and Dawes, Biochem. J., 134, 225-238 (1973).|
|19||*||Steven C. Slater, et al., J. Bacteriol. 107(10), 4431 4436 (Oct. 1988).|
|20||Steven C. Slater, et al., J. Bacteriol. 107(10), 4431-4436 (Oct. 1988).|
|21||*||Tomita, K., et al. (1982) Symposium in Honor of Dr. H. A. Lardy, Jun. 9 11, 1982, pp. 1 14.|
|22||Tomita, K., et al. (1982) Symposium in Honor of Dr. H. A. Lardy, Jun. 9-11, 1982, pp. 1-14.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5480794 *||Aug 12, 1994||Jan 2, 1996||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology And Metabolix, Inc.||Overproduction and purification of soluble PHA synthase|
|US5569595 *||Mar 24, 1993||Oct 29, 1996||Center For Innovative Technology||Production of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate in prokaryotic host cells|
|US5610041 *||Jun 6, 1994||Mar 11, 1997||Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State University||Processes for producing polyhydroxybutyrate and related polyhydroxyalkanoates in the plastids of higher plants|
|US5614576 *||Apr 15, 1996||Mar 25, 1997||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Poly(β-hydroxyorganoate) pressure sensitive adhesive compositions|
|US5650555 *||Jun 7, 1995||Jul 22, 1997||Board Of Trustees Operating Michigan State University||Transgenic plants producing polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US5750848 *||Aug 13, 1996||May 12, 1998||Monsanto Company||DNA sequence useful for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US5753364 *||Jan 30, 1997||May 19, 1998||Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company||Poly(β-hydroxyorganoate)pressure sensitive adhesive compositions|
|US5811272 *||Jul 26, 1996||Sep 22, 1998||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Method for controlling molecular weight of polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US5891686 *||Jun 24, 1997||Apr 6, 1999||Center For Innovative Technology||Method of production of poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate copolymers|
|US6071998 *||Jul 22, 1998||Jun 6, 2000||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate molding compositions|
|US6083729 *||Oct 26, 1995||Jul 4, 2000||Metabolix, Inc.||Methods for isolating polyhydroxyalkanoates from plants|
|US6103956 *||Mar 31, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis in plants|
|US6143952 *||Mar 31, 1998||Nov 7, 2000||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Modified pseudomonas oleovorans phaC1 nucleic acids encoding bispecific polyhydroxyalkanoate polymerase|
|US6175061 *||Sep 29, 1995||Jan 16, 2001||Monsanto Company||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US6207217||Jan 7, 1999||Mar 27, 2001||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Animal nutrition compositions|
|US6214920||Jun 5, 2000||Apr 10, 2001||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate molding compositions|
|US6245537||May 12, 1998||Jun 12, 2001||Metabolix, Inc.||Removing endotoxin with an oxdizing agent from polyhydroxyalkanoates produced by fermentation|
|US6265202||Jun 26, 1998||Jul 24, 2001||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||DNA encoding methymycin and pikromycin|
|US6316262||Sep 18, 1998||Nov 13, 2001||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US6329183||Aug 4, 1999||Dec 11, 2001||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US6368836||Apr 8, 1999||Apr 9, 2002||Metabolix, Inc.||Method of decolorizing or deodorizing polyhydroxyalkanoates from biomass with ozone|
|US6429285||Jan 8, 1999||Aug 6, 2002||Metabolix, Inc.||Polymer compositions providing low residue levels and methods of use thereof|
|US6451564||Jun 30, 2000||Sep 17, 2002||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Methods for producing L-isoleucine|
|US6475734||Sep 28, 2000||Nov 5, 2002||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthase genes|
|US6492134||Mar 15, 2000||Dec 10, 2002||UNIVERSITé LAVAL||Method for producing polyhydroxyalkanoates in recombinant organisms|
|US6495152||Aug 17, 2001||Dec 17, 2002||Tepha, Inc.||Sulfur containing polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions and method of production|
|US6495348||Mar 12, 1999||Dec 17, 2002||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Mitomycin biosynthetic gene cluster|
|US6514515||Mar 3, 2000||Feb 4, 2003||Tepha, Inc.||Bioabsorbable, biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering|
|US6528706||Aug 21, 2001||Mar 4, 2003||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Polyhydroxybutyrate polymerase|
|US6576450||Aug 30, 2001||Jun 10, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US6586658||Sep 3, 1999||Jul 1, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Modification of fatty acid metabolism in plants|
|US6600029||Dec 18, 1996||Jul 29, 2003||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Metabolic engineering of polyhydroxyalkanoate monomer synthases|
|US6610764||Dec 22, 1998||Aug 26, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates|
|US6623749||Mar 28, 2001||Sep 23, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical device containing polyhydroxyalkanoate treated with oxidizing agent to remove endotoxin|
|US6689589||Nov 9, 2001||Feb 10, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US6709848||Jun 12, 2000||Mar 23, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Methods for isolating polyhydroxyalkanoates from plants|
|US6746685||Nov 6, 2002||Jun 8, 2004||Tepha, Inc.||Bioabsorbable, biocompatible polymers for tissue engineering|
|US6753384||Jul 13, 2001||Jun 22, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyurethanes obtained from hydroxyalkanoates and isocyanates|
|US6806401||Dec 19, 2001||Oct 19, 2004||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US6828357||Mar 28, 2003||Dec 7, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates|
|US6835820||Jan 7, 2000||Dec 28, 2004||The University Of Massachusetts||Polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis associated proteins and coding region in bacillus megaterium|
|US6844447||Dec 18, 2002||Jan 18, 2005||Metabolix Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US6867248||Mar 28, 2003||Mar 15, 2005||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates|
|US6878758||Mar 28, 2003||Apr 12, 2005||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates|
|US6881560||Jan 13, 2003||Apr 19, 2005||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Polyhydroxybutyrate polymerase|
|US6897338||Dec 18, 2002||May 24, 2005||Metabolix, Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US6933404||Dec 18, 2002||Aug 23, 2005||Metabolix Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US6987017||Aug 20, 2002||Jan 17, 2006||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Methods for producing L-isoleucine|
|US7001969||Dec 21, 2004||Feb 21, 2006||Metabolix Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US7081357||Feb 6, 2004||Jul 25, 2006||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US7094840||Oct 25, 2001||Aug 22, 2006||Metabolix, Inc.||Compositions comprising low molecular weight polyhydroxyalkanoates and methods employing same|
|US7109007||Mar 22, 2005||Sep 19, 2006||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Polyhydroxybutyrate polymerase|
|US7129395||Aug 26, 2004||Oct 31, 2006||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US7166743||Apr 4, 2005||Jan 23, 2007||Metabolix, Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US7176349||Sep 29, 2000||Feb 13, 2007||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US7226765 *||Jun 29, 2005||Jun 5, 2007||The Procter & Gamble Company||Solvent extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoates from biomass|
|US7229804||Oct 7, 2005||Jun 12, 2007||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US7230144||Dec 18, 2002||Jun 12, 2007||Metabolix Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US7244442||Aug 15, 2003||Jul 17, 2007||Metabolix, Inc.||Method for making devices using polyhydroxyalkanoate having pyrogen removed|
|US7276361 *||Dec 9, 2002||Oct 2, 2007||Riken||Method for producing biodegradable polyester|
|US7318833||Sep 12, 2003||Jan 15, 2008||Nmt Medical, Inc.||PFO closure device with flexible thrombogenic joint and improved dislodgement resistance|
|US7341856||Jul 17, 2006||Mar 11, 2008||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US7361807||Sep 14, 2006||Apr 22, 2008||Pioneer Hi-Bred International. Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US7410783 *||May 12, 2006||Aug 12, 2008||Tatung University||Method for producing biodegradable polyester|
|US7431729||Jun 5, 2003||Oct 7, 2008||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with radial and circumferential support|
|US7455999||Jan 22, 1999||Nov 25, 2008||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly (3-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|US7504556||Nov 7, 2003||Mar 17, 2009||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly(2-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|US7553923||Oct 26, 2007||Jun 30, 2009||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers|
|US7641825||Jul 29, 2005||Jan 5, 2010||Tepha, Inc.||Method of making a polyhydroxyalkanoate filament|
|US7678123||Jul 14, 2004||Mar 16, 2010||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Tubular patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with catch system|
|US7766820||Oct 24, 2003||Aug 3, 2010||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Expandable sheath tubing|
|US7786355||Nov 16, 2001||Aug 31, 2010||Metabolix, Inc.||Production of medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates from fatty acid biosynthetic pathways|
|US7842053||Mar 30, 2005||Nov 30, 2010||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Double coil occluder|
|US7858350||Sep 9, 2009||Dec 28, 2010||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US7867250||Dec 19, 2002||Jan 11, 2011||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Septal occluder and associated methods|
|US7871419||Mar 2, 2005||Jan 18, 2011||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Delivery/recovery system for septal occluder|
|US7906135||May 15, 2007||Mar 15, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical device comprising polyhydroxyalkanoate having pyrogen removed|
|US7943683||Oct 31, 2007||May 17, 2011||Tepha, Inc.||Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers|
|US7947483||Aug 10, 2007||May 24, 2011||Genomatica, Inc.||Methods and organisms for the growth-coupled production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US7963952||Aug 19, 2004||Jun 21, 2011||Wright Jr John A||Expandable sheath tubing|
|US7967840||Oct 10, 2007||Jun 28, 2011||Nmt Medical, Inc.||PFO closure device with flexible thrombogenic joint and improved dislodgement resistance|
|US8034270||Apr 30, 2004||Oct 11, 2011||Tepha, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers|
|US8039237||May 7, 2003||Oct 18, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Bioabsorbable polymer containing 2-hydroxyacid monomers|
|US8048661||Jan 21, 2011||Nov 1, 2011||Genomatica, Inc.||Microbial organisms comprising exogenous nucleic acids encoding reductive TCA pathway enzymes|
|US8049065||Feb 2, 2009||Nov 1, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly(2-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|US8067214||Mar 14, 2008||Nov 29, 2011||Genomatica, Inc.||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US8071355||Sep 12, 2003||Dec 6, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production by coenzyme A-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase pathways|
|US8084125||Dec 11, 2009||Dec 27, 2011||Tepha, Inc.||Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures|
|US8114643||Mar 4, 2005||Feb 14, 2012||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US8129156||Nov 16, 2010||Mar 6, 2012||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US8129169||Jun 4, 2010||Mar 6, 2012||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol and related methods|
|US8178327||Jan 19, 2011||May 15, 2012||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US8231889||Feb 4, 2011||Jul 31, 2012||Metabolix, Inc.||Method of forming medical devices having pyrogen removed for in vivo application|
|US8257389||May 4, 2005||Sep 4, 2012||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catching mechanisms for tubular septal occluder|
|US8277480||Mar 20, 2006||Oct 2, 2012||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catch member for PFO occluder|
|US8308760||Apr 20, 2005||Nov 13, 2012||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Delivery systems and methods for PFO closure device with two anchors|
|US8329157||Jul 15, 2011||Dec 11, 2012||Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.||Polymers containing poly(hydroxyalkanoates) and agents for use with medical articles and methods of fabricating the same|
|US8329158||Jul 15, 2011||Dec 11, 2012||Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.||Polymers containing poly(hydroxyalkanoates) and agents for use with medical articles and methods of fabricating the same|
|US8357520||Jan 11, 2012||Jan 22, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US8361110||Apr 21, 2005||Jan 29, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Heart-shaped PFO closure device|
|US8377666||Oct 13, 2010||Feb 19, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol, 4-hydroxybutanal, 4-hydroxybutyryl-coa, putrescine and related compounds, and methods related thereto|
|US8377667||May 17, 2011||Feb 19, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol, 4-hydroxybutanal, 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, putrescine and related compounds, and methods related thereto|
|US8430907||Sep 28, 2012||Apr 30, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catch member for PFO occluder|
|US8445244||Jan 21, 2011||May 21, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Methods for increasing product yields|
|US8470582||Mar 18, 2011||Jun 25, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Methods and organisms for the growth-coupled production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US8480706||Mar 31, 2006||Jul 9, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Tubular patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with catch system|
|US8480709||Aug 21, 2012||Jul 9, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catching mechanisms for tubular septal occluder|
|US8530210||Nov 4, 2010||Sep 10, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms and methods for the coproduction 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolactone|
|US8551135||Mar 28, 2007||Oct 8, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Screw catch mechanism for PFO occluder and method of use|
|US8568431||Jan 16, 2011||Oct 29, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Delivery/recovery system for septal occluder|
|US8568447||Oct 15, 2012||Oct 29, 2013||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Delivery systems and methods for PFO closure device with two anchors|
|US8597918||Jun 3, 2010||Dec 3, 2013||Genomatica, Inc.||Process of separating components of a fermentation broth|
|US8609378||Jan 27, 2012||Dec 17, 2013||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US8636765||Apr 5, 2013||Jan 28, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catch member for PFO occluder|
|US8637286||Jan 21, 2011||Jan 28, 2014||Genomatica, Inc.||Methods for increasing product yields|
|US8703449||Sep 30, 2011||Apr 22, 2014||Metabolix, Inc.||Bioabsorbable polymer containing 2-hydroxyacid monomers|
|US8728778||Oct 25, 2007||May 20, 2014||Metabolix, Inc.||Microbial strains and processes for the manufacture of biomaterials|
|US8748139||Jun 27, 2003||Jun 10, 2014||Metabolix, Inc.||Microbial strains and process for the manufacture of biomaterials|
|US8753362||Sep 18, 2013||Jun 17, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Double spiral patent foramen ovale closure clamp|
|US8753555||Apr 11, 2011||Jun 17, 2014||Tepha, Inc.||Medical devices containing oriented films of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers|
|US8758403||Jun 28, 2011||Jun 24, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||PFO closure device with flexible thrombogenic joint and improved dislodgement resistance|
|US8758657||Jul 16, 2013||Jun 24, 2014||Tepha, Inc.||Process of making polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles|
|US8764848||Sep 26, 2005||Jul 1, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Occluder device double securement system for delivery/recovery of such occluder device|
|US8771720||Jul 10, 2012||Jul 8, 2014||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical device comprising polyhydroxyalkanoate having pyrogen removed using oxidizing agent|
|US8784448||Sep 15, 2008||Jul 22, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with radial and circumferential support|
|US8814947||Mar 29, 2007||Aug 26, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Deformable flap catch mechanism for occluder device|
|US8828049||Jan 21, 2010||Sep 9, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Split ends closure device and methods of use|
|US8870913||Mar 27, 2007||Oct 28, 2014||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catch system with locking cap for patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder|
|US8889399||Oct 31, 2011||Nov 18, 2014||Genomatica, Inc.||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US8945158||Sep 30, 2013||Feb 3, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Delivery/recovery system for septal occluder|
|US8969054||Dec 17, 2012||Mar 3, 2015||Genomatica, Inc.||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US9005242||Apr 4, 2008||Apr 14, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Septal closure device with centering mechanism|
|US9017373||Dec 9, 2003||Apr 28, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Septal closure devices|
|US9028527||Jul 17, 2014||May 12, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with radial and circumferential support|
|US9078634||Jan 26, 2012||Jul 14, 2015||Cryosa, Llc||Apparatus and methods for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea utilizing cryolysis of adipose tissues|
|US9084603||Nov 12, 2013||Jul 21, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catch members for occluder devices|
|US9125719||Sep 8, 2011||Sep 8, 2015||Tepha, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers|
|US9138562||Apr 18, 2008||Sep 22, 2015||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Flexible catheter system|
|US9149263||Feb 16, 2010||Oct 6, 2015||W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Tubular patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with catch system|
|US9175297||Apr 17, 2012||Nov 3, 2015||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-Butanediol|
|US9222113||Jul 8, 2013||Dec 29, 2015||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms and methods for the coproduction 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolactone|
|US9241695||Mar 25, 2003||Jan 26, 2016||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure clips|
|US9326759||Jul 2, 2013||May 3, 2016||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Tubular patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with catch system|
|US9333066||May 13, 2014||May 10, 2016||Tepha, Inc.||Method of making a medical textile from polyhydroxyalkanoate fibers|
|US9434964||Jan 30, 2012||Sep 6, 2016||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol and related methods|
|US9439805||Jun 11, 2015||Sep 13, 2016||Cryosa, Llc||Apparatus and methods for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea utilizing cryolysis of adipose tissues|
|US9474517||Mar 31, 2016||Oct 25, 2016||W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Heart occlusion devices|
|US9487803||Jan 22, 2015||Nov 8, 2016||Genomatica, Inc.||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US9545247||Jun 28, 2013||Jan 17, 2017||W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.||Catching mechanisms for tubular septal occluder|
|US9555155||Dec 10, 2015||Jan 31, 2017||Tepha, Inc.||Methods of orienting multifilament yarn and monofilaments of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and copolymers thereof|
|US9677045||Jun 3, 2013||Jun 13, 2017||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms and methods for production of 4-hydroxybutyrate, 1,4-butanediol and related compounds|
|US20020035231 *||Jul 13, 2001||Mar 21, 2002||Whitehouse Robert S.||Polyurethanes obtained from hydroxyalkanoates and isocyanates|
|US20020187530 *||Nov 9, 2001||Dec 12, 2002||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US20030008359 *||Aug 20, 2002||Jan 9, 2003||Massachussetts Institute Of Technology||Methods for producing L-isoleucine|
|US20030017576 *||Nov 16, 2001||Jan 23, 2003||Stephanie Aquin||Production of medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoates from fatty acid biosynthetic pathways|
|US20030124689 *||Oct 9, 2002||Jul 3, 2003||Regents Of The University Of Minnesota||Mitomycin biosynthetic gene cluster|
|US20030158274 *||Dec 18, 2002||Aug 21, 2003||Luhua Zhong||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US20030158441 *||Dec 18, 2002||Aug 21, 2003||Luhua Zhong||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US20030162851 *||Dec 18, 2002||Aug 28, 2003||Luhua Zhong||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US20030167532 *||Dec 19, 2001||Sep 4, 2003||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US20030194784 *||Oct 15, 2002||Oct 16, 2003||Sherman David H.||DNA encoding methymycin and pikromycin|
|US20030233677 *||May 28, 2003||Dec 18, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Modification of fatty acid metabolism in plants|
|US20030236320 *||Mar 28, 2003||Dec 25, 2003||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositions having controlled degradation rates|
|US20040014197 *||Jun 27, 2003||Jan 22, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Microbial strains and process for the manufacture of biomaterials|
|US20040023347 *||May 21, 2003||Feb 5, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US20040053381 *||Aug 15, 2003||Mar 18, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoates for in vivo applications|
|US20040093017 *||Nov 6, 2003||May 13, 2004||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Medical devices utilizing modified shape memory alloy|
|US20040106176 *||Sep 12, 2003||Jun 3, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production by coenzyme A-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase pathways|
|US20040137586 *||Feb 6, 2004||Jul 15, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US20040172675 *||Nov 7, 2003||Sep 2, 2004||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly(2-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|US20040234576 *||Apr 30, 2004||Nov 25, 2004||Tepha, Inc., State Of Incorporation Delaware||Polyhydroxyalkanoate medical textiles and fibers|
|US20050009949 *||Dec 9, 2002||Jan 13, 2005||Yoshiharu Doi||Process for producing biodegradable polyester|
|US20050064565 *||Jan 13, 2003||Mar 24, 2005||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Polyhydroxybutyrate polymerase|
|US20050097636 *||Aug 26, 2004||May 5, 2005||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US20050101760 *||Dec 21, 2004||May 12, 2005||Metabolix Inc.||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US20050182235 *||Apr 4, 2005||Aug 18, 2005||Metabolix Inc., A Delaware Corporation||Methods of making intermediates from polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|US20050239179 *||Mar 4, 2005||Oct 27, 2005||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|US20050287653 *||Jun 29, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||The Procter & Gamble Company||Solvent extraction of polyhydroxyalkanoates from biomass|
|US20060040281 *||Mar 22, 2005||Feb 23, 2006||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Polyhydroxybutyrate polymerase|
|US20060058470 *||Jul 29, 2005||Mar 16, 2006||Tepha, Inc.||Non-curling polyhydroxyalkanoate sutures|
|US20060084155 *||Oct 7, 2005||Apr 20, 2006||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological systems for manufacture of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers containing 4-hydroxyacids|
|US20060177513 *||Jan 27, 2006||Aug 10, 2006||Tepha, Inc.||Embolization using poly-4-hydroxybutyrate particles|
|US20060183209 *||Feb 16, 2006||Aug 17, 2006||Metabolix, Inc.||Enzymes for biopolymer production|
|US20060247390 *||Jun 30, 2006||Nov 2, 2006||Whitehouse Robert S||Compositions comprising low molecular weight polyhydroxyalkanoates and methods employing same|
|US20060252139 *||Jul 17, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US20060253937 *||Jul 17, 2006||Nov 9, 2006||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US20060260006 *||Jul 17, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||Production of polyhydroxyalkanoate in plants|
|US20070011771 *||Sep 14, 2006||Jan 11, 2007||Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.||OAR polynucleotides, polypeptides and their use in PHA production in plants|
|US20070244518 *||Mar 27, 2007||Oct 18, 2007||Nmt Medical, Inc.||Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure device with linearly elongating petals|
|US20070264696 *||May 12, 2006||Nov 15, 2007||Tatung University||Method for producing biodegradable polyester|
|US20070280899 *||May 15, 2007||Dec 6, 2007||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoates for In Vivo Applications|
|US20070293635 *||Aug 28, 2007||Dec 20, 2007||Whitehouse Robert S||Alkanoic Acid Ester Monomer Compositions and Methods Of Making Same|
|US20080095823 *||Oct 26, 2007||Apr 24, 2008||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical Devices and Applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Polymers|
|US20090075351 *||Mar 14, 2008||Mar 19, 2009||Burk Mark J||Compositions and methods for the biosynthesis of 1,4-butanediol and its precursors|
|US20090226962 *||Oct 25, 2007||Sep 10, 2009||Metabolix, Inc.||Microbial strains and processes for the manufacture of biomaterials|
|US20100112654 *||Sep 9, 2009||May 6, 2010||Burk Mark J||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US20100311131 *||Feb 2, 2009||Dec 9, 2010||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly(2-hydroxy-butyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|US20110008856 *||Oct 25, 2007||Jan 13, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Biological Systems for Manufacture of Polyhydroxyalkanoate Polymers Containing 4-Hydroxyacids|
|US20110129899 *||Oct 13, 2010||Jun 2, 2011||Robert Haselbeck||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol, 4-hydroxybutanal, 4-hydroxybutyryl-coa, putrescine and related compounds, and methods related thereto|
|US20110135707 *||Feb 4, 2011||Jun 9, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoates for in vivo applications|
|US20110159572 *||Nov 16, 2010||Jun 30, 2011||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol|
|US20110166598 *||Dec 2, 2010||Jul 7, 2011||Entrigue Surgical, Inc.||Devices and methods for tongue stabilization|
|US20110217742 *||Nov 4, 2010||Sep 8, 2011||Jun Sun||Microorganisms and methods for the coproduction 1,4-butanediol and gamma-butyrolactone|
|US20110229946 *||May 17, 2011||Sep 22, 2011||Genomatica, Inc.||Microorganisms for the production of 1,4-butanediol, 4-hydroxybutanal, 4-hydroxybutyryl-coa, putrescine and related compounds, and methods related thereto|
|USRE37543 *||May 12, 2000||Feb 5, 2002||Monsanto Company||DNA sequence useful for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates|
|EP1049784B1 *||Jan 19, 1999||Apr 20, 2005||Lg Chemical Ltd.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis-related genes derived from alcaligenes latus|
|EP1975236A2||Aug 4, 1999||Oct 1, 2008||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from polyols|
|EP2088198A2||Jan 21, 2000||Aug 12, 2009||Metabolix, Inc.||Transgenic systems for the manufacture of poly(3-hydroxy-butyrate-CO-3-hydroxyhexanoate)|
|EP2258742A1||Dec 22, 1998||Dec 8, 2010||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate compositons having controlled degradation rates|
|EP2275468A1||Jul 13, 2001||Jan 19, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Polyurethanes obtained from hydroxyalkanoates and isocyanates|
|EP2305324A1||Mar 24, 2000||Apr 6, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Medical devices and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoate polymers|
|EP2365088A2||Sep 12, 2003||Sep 14, 2011||Metalbolix Inc.||Polyhydroxyalkanoate production by coenzyme a-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase pathways|
|EP2431475A2||May 7, 2003||Mar 21, 2012||Metabolix, Inc.||Bioabsorbable polymer containing 2-hydroxyacid monomers|
|WO1996005316A1 *||Aug 10, 1995||Feb 22, 1996||Massachusetts Institute Of Technology||Overproduction and purification of soluble pha synthase|
|WO2002016284A2||Aug 21, 2001||Feb 28, 2002||Metabolix, Inc.||Low molecular weight polyhydroxyalkanoate molding compositions|
|WO2011068952A1||Dec 2, 2010||Jun 9, 2011||Entrigue Surgical, Inc.||Devices for tongue stabilization|
|WO2011100608A1||Feb 11, 2011||Aug 18, 2011||Metabolix, Inc.||Process for producing a monomer component from a genetically modified polyhydroxyalkanoate biomass|
|U.S. Classification||536/23.2, 435/193, 435/135, 435/191, 435/232, 435/190|
|International Classification||C12N1/21, C12N9/10, C12N15/60, C12N9/04, C12P7/62, C12N15/52, C12N9/00|
|Cooperative Classification||C12P7/625, C12N9/1029, C12N9/0006, C12N15/52, C12N9/00|
|European Classification||C12N9/10C1, C12N9/00P2, C12P7/62A, C12N15/52, C12N9/00|
|Feb 24, 1997||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Mar 9, 2001||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 8
|Feb 8, 2005||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 12
|Nov 14, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, MASSACHUSET
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PEOPLES, OLIVER P.;SINSKEY, ANTHONY J.;REEL/FRAME:018515/0364
Effective date: 19890911