|Publication number||US5290507 A|
|Application number||US 07/657,642|
|Publication date||Mar 1, 1994|
|Filing date||Feb 19, 1991|
|Priority date||Feb 19, 1991|
|Also published as||CA2105178A1, DE69225312D1, DE69225312T2, EP0572548A1, EP0572548B1, WO1992014853A1|
|Publication number||07657642, 657642, US 5290507 A, US 5290507A, US-A-5290507, US5290507 A, US5290507A|
|Inventors||Joseph C. Runkle|
|Original Assignee||Runkle Joseph C|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (33), Non-Patent Citations (19), Referenced by (49), Classifications (18), Legal Events (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to a group of iron based macrocomposites and to their method of fabrication, particularly for use as thermal fatigue and wear resistant parts, coatings or claddings.
Isostatic pressing generally is used to produce powdered metal parts to near net sizes and shapes of varied complexity. Hot isostatic processing is performed in a gaseous (inert argon or helium) atmosphere contained within a pressure vessel. Typically, the gaseous atmosphere as well as the powder to be pressed are heated by a furnace within the vessel. Common pressure levels extend upward to 45,000 psi, with temperatures exceeding about 1300° C.
In the hot isostatic process, the powder to be hot compacted is placed in a hermetically sealed container, usually made of a weldable metal alloy such as steel or glass. The container deforms plastically at elevated temperatures. Prior to sealing, the container is evacuated, which may include a thermal out-gassing stage to eliminate residual gases in the powder mass that may result in undesirable porosity, high internal stresses, dissolved contaminants and/or oxide formation.
In the hot isostatic process, densification to full density is achievable with most materials. The resulting mechanical properties are equivalent to those of wrought parts in similar structural condition. In some materials, the properties of the hot isostatic product are superior because of reduced anisotropy. Hot isostatic pressing has been used extensively in commercial production of high speed tool steel billets and near net shapes of full density.
On the one hand, heat treated steels have low abrasion resistance and high toughness. Therefore it is desirable to overcome such low abrasion resistance. On the other hand, carbide compositions (carbides), for example tungsten carbide (a ceramic) or the cemented tungsten carbide cobalt (a cermet) have outstanding wear resistance (i.e., to abrasion, corrosion and wear). However, these carbides are usually too brittle to be used as structural elements (which must possess the ability to withstand impact). Furthermore, wear resistant materials (such as carbides) typically are more costly than common alloy steel. As well, cemented carbides, due to their brittleness and lower coefficient of thermal expansion cannot be metallurgically clad or bonded to large steel substrates without great difficulty or expense.
Therefore, it is desirable to form a substrate of less expensive steel essentially in net shape and then to coat or "clad" a wear resistant material over this substrate. In a typical hot isostatic cladding process, a wear resistant alloy powder (e.g., a carbide powder) to be compacted is poured and vibratorily packed into a container of desired shape along with a formed alloy-steel substrate. The powder mass is then simultaneously compacted and bonded to the substrate during the hot isostatic treatment to form a wear resistant coating on the steel substrate. While this process raises initial tool costs, it is generally considered cost effective given the increased life of the formed tool.
Champagne, et al., in "Properties of WC-Co/Steel Composites", International Journal of Refractory and Hard Metals, Vol. 6, No. 3, September 1987, pp. 155-160, compare the relationship of high abrasion resistance (generally referred to hereinafter as wear resistance) and toughness of cemented carbides, white cast irons, austenitic manganese steels, and heat treated steels. This comparison is shown in FIG. 1. Also a class of wear resistant macrocomposite materials is described having moderate wear resistance and moderate toughness. These macrocomposites are a combination of less than 30 percent by volume cemented cermet carbides and a heat treated steel matrix, and thus benefit from the wear advantages of cemented carbides and the toughness of the heat treated steel.
In Champagne et al., cemented carbide particles were produced by agglomerating fine tungsten carbide and cobalt powders and subsequently consolidating by vacuum sintering. The particles were nearly spherical and in the 0.1 to 1 mm size range. Selected amounts of the particles and steel powders were wet mixed, and green compacts were fabricated from these mixtures. After drying, preforms were compacted and hot isostatically treated. It was observed by Champagne et al. that, while the wear losses of composites (including tungsten carbide cobalt particles) in a steel matrix decrease rapidly with the content of the tungsten carbide, no important decrease in wear losses was expected by increasing the volume fraction of tungsten carbide cobalt particles above 30 percent in the steel matrix. Hence the proportion of tungsten carbide cobalt particles in the composites of Champagne et al. was limited to a maximum content of 30 volume percent.
Furthermore, it was also observed in Champagne et al., that tungsten carbide particles were strongly bonded to the steel matrix after hot isostatic treatment at 1100° C. at 15,000 psi for one hour, with the matrix constituted of ferrite and pearlite, as expected for a hypoeutectoid steel containing 0.5 weight percent carbon. Carbon enrichment of the steel matrix from dissolution of the tungsten carbide cobalt particles was very limited even during hot isostatic treatment up to six hours at 1100° C. However, the matrix of the composites so treated at temperatures above 1100° C. changed from a ferrite-pearlite to a fully pearlitic structure, indicating a major carbon enrichment of the matrix at the expense of the tungsten carbide of the tungsten carbide cobalt particles, thus weakening the tungsten carbide and promoting eta phase formation. Furthermore, the interfaces between the tungsten carbide cobalt particles and the steel matrix became quite thick above 1100° C., as a result of diffusion. At 1250° C. the flow of cobalt out of the particles into the matrix was considered detrimental to ductility and strength of the composites since the resulting carbides were said to be brittle and to have lower mechanical properties.
One problem with pure cemented WC/CO cermet is that it cannot be easily bonded to steel substrates due to its relatively low (compared to steel) coefficient of thermal expansion and its intrinsic brittleness. It is therefore an object of the present invention to obtain a new class of materials from which parts and claddings may be economically formed having good wear resistance and toughness, with improved thermal fatigue resistance and having a mean coefficient of thermal expansion and a thermal conductivity midway between those of high speed tool steel and tungsten carbide.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an economical alloy with improved thermal fatigue resistance and resistance to thermal cracking.
It is another object of the present invention to form a tool steel part having good wear resistance and toughness in a combination previously unavailable for general use.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an improved wear resistance coating of good toughness which can be applied in a hot isostatic pressing process to enhance the wear resistance of a formed part with improved thermal fatigue resistance and resistance to thermal cracking, and which can be hot isostatic diffusion bonded, or brazed, directly to a tool steel substrate.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide methods of achieving the foregoing objects.
In practice of the present invention, a new class of hot isostatically treated tool steel macrocomposites is disclosed having, among other features, minimized degradation by thermal fatigue (e.g., heat checking) and longer life. These new macrocomposites are formed with a ceramic or cermet carbide microcomposite held in a matrix of hard, tough tool steel. The tool steel itself is also actually a microcomposite of hardenable steel and carbides. These macrocomposites also have improved wear resistance.
Various tool steels may be employed in practice of the invention. Many tool steels are presently commercially available, such as steels of the AISI-SAG type W, S, O, A, D, H, T, M, L, F, and P, and others. (See Metals Handbook, 1969, Vol. 1, 8th Ed., A.S.M. Publ., p. 638, incorporated herein by reference.) (Also available are the CPM series tool steels such as developed under various patents assigned to Crucible Steel, Inc.)
M-4 and T-15 tool steels are each commonly employed in the formation of hard tool steel tools and bits. M-4 tool steels are characterized by approximating the following composition:
______________________________________Carbon 1.3Chromium 4.0Vanadium 4.0Tungsten 5.5Molybdenum 4.5(Balance iron, withincidental impurities)______________________________________
T-15 tool steels are characterized by approximating the following composition:
______________________________________ Weight Per Centimeter______________________________________Carbon 1.5Chromium 4.0Vanadium 5.0Tungsten 12.0Cobalt 5.0(Balance iron, withincidental impurities)______________________________________
These are hard tool steels. Softer tool steel alloys are also available in various compositions. An example is T-1, which is characterized by approximating the following composition:
______________________________________Carbon 0.70Chromium 4.00Vanadium 1.00Tungsten 18.00(Balance iron, withincidental impurities)______________________________________
Tool steels and carbides (such as cemented carbides) have distinct and at times contrasting qualities. Tool steels, particularly high speed tool steels, exhibit higher thermal expansion coefficients and better toughness than carbides but lower hardness, lower thermal conductivity and lower abrasion resistance. Also, while the hardness of tool steels can be varied by heat treatment, the hardness of carbides does not respond to heat treatment.
In practice of the present invention, thermal fatigue is minimized by forming a macrocomposite from components having a combination of low thermal expansion and high thermal conductivity. As a result, the hardness and toughness benefits of tool steel are married with the low thermal expansion coefficient, hardness and wear resistance benefits of carbides in a new class of macrocomposites having improved thermal fatigue resistance and lifespan.
In the presently disclosed macrocomposites a tool steel matrix is used which is metallurgically and physically more compatible with a carbide (such as a tungsten ceramic or cermet powder) than is a common alloy steel matrix, and therefore enables higher concentrations of carbide to be employed with beneficial results. The higher amount of carbide provides better wear resistance, and use of a tool steel matrix provides better toughness and lower cost compared to a carbide coating alone. The higher concentration of carbide also decreases the thermal expansion coefficient of the composite relative to tool steel. Thus, the macrocomposite of the present invention achieves a thermal expansion coefficient which is a product of the beneficial mixture of the microcomposite components.
In one aspect of the invention, generally, a macrocomposite material having improved thermal fatigue resistance includes (a) a matrix of diffusion-bonded powdered tool steel from the group consisting of M, T, H, D, W, S, O, A, L, F, P or CPM series tool steel, and (b) islands of diffusion-bonded carbide powder affixed within said matrix. The islands may include a ceramic or a cermet.
The carbides used in practice of the present invention preferably are formed from various refractory metals, such as tungsten, titanium, molybdenum, niobium, vanadium, silicon, hafnium, and tantalum. These carbides may be formed as a brittle but wear resistant carbide (a ceramic), or may include a metallic cementing agent, such as cobalt, cobalt-chromium, nickel, iron, and other metallic agents, to form a less brittle cemented carbide (a cermet). Preferred carbides include tungsten carbide and titanium carbide. Another useful carbide is nickel cemented titanium carbide. More particularly, in one example, the tool steel includes M-4 or T-15 steel and the carbide is tungsten carbide or tungsten carbide at about 6 to 17 percent cobalt; in an alternative example the tool steel includes H-11 steel and the carbide is tungsten carbide at about 12 percent cobalt. Generally the carbide is selected from the group consisting of: W, TaC, TiC, NbC, NiC, VC, and SiC, including cobalt, nickel, chromium or molybdenum binder phases, for example, or the carbide may be formed from the group consisting of: tungsten carbide or tungsten carbide with tantalum carbide at less than about 1.5 percent cobalt binder, or tungsten carbide or tungsten carbide with tantalum carbide at about 3-30 percent cobalt, cobalt/chromium, or nickel binder, or titanium carbide at 3-30 percent with nickel or nickel molybdenum binder. The cermet generally has the following compositional range: carbide 97 to 75 percent, binder 3 to 25 percent.
The volumetric ratio of tool steel microcomposite powder to carbide microcomposite powder is desirably between 3:1 and 1:3 and preferably is about 1:1. The carbide microcomposite powder may include angularly or spherically shaped particles ranging up to about 500 μm, but possibly with carbide microcomposite powder of spherically shaped particles less than 1000 μm and preferably less than 100 μM. Preferably the tool steel has a carbon content of between about 1 and 2 percent.
In another aspect of the invention, a process for forming a macrocomposition having improved thermal fatigue resistance includes the steps of mixing a tool steel microcomposite alloy powder and a carbide microcomposite powder to form a powder mass in a manner that said powders are generally well distributed in the mass, hot isostatically treating a hermetically sealed portion of the mass to a temperature of at least 1100° C. at at least 2-3000 psi until the mass is diffusion bonded into a macrocomposite having a tool steel matrix, formed from the tool steel microcomposite powder, and carbide islands, formed from the carbide microcomposite powder dispersed in the matrix. This process may include placing a substrate in a treatment container and then cladding the mass onto the substrate. The temperature is preferably held around 1200°-1250° C. for a time period and pressure sufficient to achieve full density. In a preferred process the treatment is raised to about 1250° C. for about 4 hours at about 15,000 psi.
The mixing of powders may include plasma spraying, or may include mechanically mixing the powders in a magnetic field, such as with tumble or vibratory mixing in a magnetic field.
As a result of the invention, the brittleness of the carbides (ceramic or cermet) is less of a factor in performance because the macrocomposite provides a tough crack-resistant matrix to bind the brittle carbides. Thus cracks that start in the carbide are blunted or arrested by the tool steel matrix. Also, while the tool steel is not tougher than alloy steel, it is more compatible with the carbides. Hence, in practice of the present invention it is possible to improve the already high wear resistance of tool steel by adding large amounts of carbide which can be combined with the tool steel and fully densified and bonded at high temperature via hot isostatic pressing. Furthermore, given the better match in coefficients of thermal expansion between the macrocomposite and steel substrate, the invention is very useful for diffusion bonding of a wear resistant coating of adequate toughness onto a substrate.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully understood by reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the attached drawings in which like reference numerals refer to like elements and in which:
FIG. 1 is a prior art graph comparing high stress abrasion resistance versus toughness for several classes of materials.
FIG. 2 is a graph comparing high stress abrasion resistance versus toughness for the several materials of FIG. 1 and the new class of macrocomposite materials of the present invention.
FIG. 3 shows the mixing of two microcomposite powders.
FIG. 4 is a reproduction of a photograph at 100X magnification of an embodiment of the present invention incorporating a pure tungsten carbide ceramic combined with T-15 high speed tool steel matrix, at 1:1, HIP treated at about 1200° C. for two hours, 15 Kpsi, heat treated at about 1200° C. for 30 minutes, air quenched, double tempered at about 565° C. for three hours.
FIG. 5 is a reproduction of a photograph at 100 magnification of a macrocomposite of the present invention incorporating a tungsten carbide cobalt cermet microcomposite in an M-4 high speed tool steel matrix, at 1:1, Hi 1) treated at about 1205° C. for two hours at 15 Kpsi.
FIG. 6 is a graph comparing Vickers hardness to toughness for several classes of materials.
Turning now to FIG. 2, it will be understood that a new class (10) of macrocomposite materials enjoys good wear resistance and good toughness, with improved thermal fatigue resistance relative to tool steel.
As more particularly shown in FIG. 3, the present invention is a macrocomposite formed from combining a microcomposite tool steel powder 12 with a microcomposite carbide ceramic powder 14 or a cermet powder 16. The prealloyed, gas-atomized tool steel powder and the carbide powder each maintain their integrity as they are mixed. Preferably the powders are combined in a mixing chamber 13. This combining is preferably done mechanically or vibratorily within a magnetic field F, such that the powders remain mixed as they are then poured into a hot isostatic treatment container (not shown).
As shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, after the hot isostatic treatment, a portion of the resulting macrostructure 10, 10' has the tool steel microstructure 12 and the remainder has either the ceramic 14 or cermet 16 microstructure of FIG. 4 or 5. The resulting macrocomposite 10, 10' therefore, exhibits the characteristics of the microcomposites and therefore benefits both from the toughness of the tool steel and the wear resistance of the carbide compound and the low thermal expansion coefficient and the high thermal conductivity of the ceramic or cermet.
Preferably the two microcomposites are mixed in nearly equal volume percentages such that after treatment, about half of the macrocomposite has the tool steel microstructure and half has the ceramic or cermet microstructure. But the exact ratio can be varied by a person skilled in the art to achieve the best combination of properties in the macrocomposite for the desired application. The tool steel microstructure 12 is actually a combination of steel and small carbide particles (such as of tungsten, vanadium or molybdium, for example). The tool steel alloy powder is preferably formed by inert-gas or water atomization.
For purposes of illustration, microcomposite ceramic tungsten carbide powder particles 14 are shown in FIG. 4 after compaction as bound in a sea of tool steel 12. In FIG. 5, microcomposite cermet particles 16 (preferably formed from tungsten, carbon and cobalt) are shown after compaction bound in a sea of tool steel 12. In this example, the tungsten carbide is cemented in a matrix of cobalt to form the microcomposite powder particles 16. Preferably the particle size for each of the constituents is approximately equal.
One example of the invention, in terms of thermal expansion and thermal conductivity, is shown in Table A (line 3), as a combination midway between tungsten carbide ceramic or cermet (line 1) and T-15 tool steel (line 2).
______________________________________ Thermal Expansion Thermal Coefficient Conductivity 10-6 in/in/°F. Btu ft2 /ft · °F. ·______________________________________ hr1. Tungsten carbide 2.6-3.0 55-652. T-15 tool stee1 6.6 13-163. 50% WC/T-15 4.0-4.8 30-40 macrocomposite invention______________________________________
In essence, the present invention recognizes that not only does tool steel demonstrate far better wear resistance than common alloy heat treated steel, but in addition, it is more compatible with a carbide. For example, alloyed steel typically includes 0.2 percent to 0.45 percent carbon and small amounts (less than 5 percent) of molybdenum and chromium, but tool steel (such as T-15) has cobalt, tungsten and carbon in good proportion. Thus a T-15 tool steel, for example, cooperates well chemically with a tungsten carbide ceramic (because the steel already has tungsten and carbon in it) and even better with a tungsten carbide-cobalt cermet (because the steel also has cobalt in it). Likewise the alternative tool steels set forth above yield improved compatibility also.
The better chemistry of the present combination reduces or avoids the formation of a reaction zone around the carbide cermet, even at 1250° C., and avoids mass migration of carbon out of the carbide compared to prior art macrocomposites using a heat treated steel matrix. Thus the resulting carbides retain their advantageous mechanical properties even after processing at high temperatures. In one example, the cobalt content at around 5 percent of the tool steel retards mass cobalt migration from a cobalt cermeted carbide to the tool steel matrix, thereby allowing the cermeted carbide to retain good toughness. Therefore, the tool steel and carbide materials combine quite well during the hot isostatic treatment to form an inherently tough macrocomposite with a unique combination of physical properties. The cermet might range from tungsten carbide 97 percent to 75 percent with cobalt at 3 percent to 25 percent.
As two further examples of the invention, 50 percent by volume of 50-100 μM tungsten carbide cermet particles, at 6 percent cobalt, were mixed with 50 percent by volume of similarly sized T-15 high speed tool steel, in one example, and M-4 type high speed tool steel in another example, respectively. These combinations were each respectively hot isostatically clad at 1200° C./15,000 psi for 2-4 hours in 0.325 inch thickness into rolls for use in the hot rolling of steel I-beams. The rolls were used in "annealed" and heat treated conditions. In all cases the macrocomposite tool steel/cemented carbide composite substantially outperformed straight or common D-2 and T-15 tool steel rolls. Other examples of the invention include M-4 or T-15 and WC; M-2 or T-15 and Wc+Co 12 percent; M-2 or T-15 and Wc+Co 17 percent; and H-11 and Wc+Co 12 percent, generally at 1200° C./15,000 psi for 2-4 hours, and then heat treated. Heat treating may include 1200° C. at 30 minutes, Ar quench and double temper at 565° C., for three hours, for example.
A preferred particle size is about 25-100 micron of crushed carbide. Any particle smaller than 100 microns would likely have been consumed or degraded in prior art processes using a tungsten cermet, such as in Champagne et al., owing to the migration of materials out of the tungsten carbide cermet, particularly at elevated temperatures. In the present invention, particle size and particle characteristics are not limitations, and are selected to be generally matched in size so as to facilitate blending.
Furthermore, in the composition of 50 percent by volume of T-15 tool steel and 50 percent particles of tungsten at 6 percent cobalt, the microhardness of the tungsten carbide particles after treatment (about 1700 vicker) was higher than what would be normally expected for tungsten carbide cobalt at 6 percent cobalt. It is believed that this occurs because some cobalt apparently migrates from the tungsten carbide cermet particle into the tool steel matrix. The tungsten carbide cermet remaining with lower cobalt is therefore converted to a lower cobalt binder carbide microcomposite material (with higher wear resistance) as it is held in the microcomposite tool steel matrix.
Cemented tungsten carbide cobalt and the ceramic tungsten carbide have very low coefficients of thermal expansion. If one of these carbide materials, say tungsten carbide, is clad onto an alloy steel substrate, the cermet coating will form cracks during cooling of the part. However, the new coating of the present invention as previously described has a coefficient of thermal expansion located somewhat between tool steel and the ceramic or cermet carbide, which makes the material easier to treat hot isostatically and to diffusion bond onto a tool steel substrate, with less likelihood of cracking as the coating and substrate cool. Therefore the present invention has very practical advantages in the manufacturing stage. Therefore, an assembly of the macrocomposite described above, as bonded to an alloy steel substrate, after being conventionally normalized, quenched and hardened, does not develop cracks.
Turning to FIG. 6, a comparison is provided of the Vicker hardness (which is related to wear resistance) versus toughness (which is related to resistance to fracture) of various materials including the macrocomposite of the present invention 28, common alloy steel 26, common tool steel 24, tungsten carbide cermet 22 and ceramic 20.
The tungsten carbide ceramic 20 has a hardness of about 2200 Vickers, but is very brittle (i.e., low toughness). A tungsten carbide cermet 22 (such as tungsten carbide cobalt) has a Vickers hardness typically from about 1500 to 1800, and being less brittle, is considered a more useful composite than the carbide ceramic. The alloy steels 26 typically have Vicker hardness from about 200 to 400 and relatively high toughness. Tool steels 24 range from about 600 to 950 Vickers with moderate toughness and higher wear resistance than alloy steel. The present invention combines the benefits of the carbides (either ceramic or cermet) and of tool steel to obtain a class of materials 28 with hardness perhaps in the range of 600 to 1700 Vickers, having moderate toughness and much higher wear resistance than mere alloy steel or tool steel.
It will be understood that the above description pertains to only several embodiments of the present invention. That is, the description is provided by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. The invention, therefore, is to be defined according to the following claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3556780 *||Jan 3, 1966||Jan 19, 1971||Iit Res Inst||Process for producing carbide-containing alloy|
|US3561934 *||Sep 11, 1967||Feb 9, 1971||Crucible Inc||Sintered steel particles containing dispersed carbides|
|US3653982 *||Dec 18, 1969||Apr 4, 1972||Chromalloy American Corp||Temper resistant chromium-containing titanium carbide tool steel|
|US3746518 *||Feb 26, 1965||Jul 17, 1973||Crucible Inc||Alloy composition and process|
|US3809540 *||Dec 29, 1972||May 7, 1974||Chromalloy American Corp||Sintered steel bonded titanium carbide tool steel characterized by an improved combination of transverse rupture strength and resistance to thermal shock|
|US3842471 *||Jul 9, 1973||Oct 22, 1974||Morgaardshammar Ab||Composite roll|
|US3977837 *||Nov 6, 1973||Aug 31, 1976||Chromalloy American Corporation||Titanium carbide tool steel having improved properties|
|US4112564 *||Apr 13, 1977||Sep 12, 1978||Seco Tools Aktiebolag||Method of making a composite roller|
|US4146388 *||Dec 8, 1977||Mar 27, 1979||Gte Sylvania Incorporated||Molybdenum plasma spray powder, process for producing said powder, and coatings made therefrom|
|US4469514 *||Oct 8, 1974||Sep 4, 1984||Crucible, Inc.||Sintered high speed tool steel alloy composition|
|US4546527 *||Nov 29, 1982||Oct 15, 1985||Kubota Ltd.||Composite sleeve for use in rolling rolls for H-section steel and channel steel|
|US4569823 *||Mar 23, 1984||Feb 11, 1986||Kloster Speedsteel Aktiebolag||Powder metallurgical method|
|US4576642 *||Jul 19, 1984||Mar 18, 1986||Crucible Materials Corporation||Alloy composition and process|
|US4618540 *||May 2, 1984||Oct 21, 1986||Santrade Limited||Compound body and method of making the same|
|US4747225 *||Dec 14, 1983||May 31, 1988||Vereinigte Edelstahlwerke Aktiengesellschaft (Vew)||Weapon barrel with metallorgically bonded wear resistant liner|
|US4756677 *||Oct 7, 1986||Jul 12, 1988||Vereinigte Edelstahlwerke Aktiengesellshaft||Method of manufacturing a weapon barrel|
|US4764488 *||Sep 24, 1986||Aug 16, 1988||Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho||High toughness ceramic composites consisting of ceramic body reinforced with metal fiber|
|US4913737 *||Jun 3, 1988||Apr 3, 1990||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Sintered metallic parts using extrusion process|
|US4936912 *||Jun 27, 1988||Jun 26, 1990||Deere & Company||Sintered apex seal material|
|US4954058 *||Jan 25, 1990||Sep 4, 1990||Deere & Company||Method for making composite sintered apex seal material|
|US4958422 *||Mar 24, 1988||Sep 25, 1990||501 Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Wear-resistant compound roll|
|US4968347 *||Nov 22, 1988||Nov 6, 1990||The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy||High energy product permanent magnet having improved intrinsic coercivity and method of making same|
|US4973356 *||Oct 23, 1989||Nov 27, 1990||Sandvik Ab||Method of making a hard material with properties between cemented carbide and high speed steel and the resulting material|
|US5054682 *||Sep 6, 1989||Oct 8, 1991||Cmb Foodcan Plc||Method of bonding a tool material to a holder and tools made by the method|
|DE3308409A1 *||Mar 9, 1983||Sep 20, 1984||Seilstorfer Gmbh & Co Metallur||Process for the production of a sintered material alloy|
|DE3310038A1 *||Mar 19, 1983||Sep 27, 1984||Krupp Gmbh||Process for the production of a composite body, predominantly exposed to abrasive wear|
|DE3507332A1 *||Mar 1, 1985||Sep 4, 1986||Seilstorfer Gmbh & Co Metallur||Steel matrix/sintered material composite|
|DE3508982A1 *||Mar 13, 1985||Sep 18, 1986||Seilstorfer Gmbh & Co Metallur||Steel matrix/sintered material composite|
|EP0023733A1 *||Jul 9, 1980||Feb 11, 1981||SKF Industrial Trading & Development Co, B.V.||Method for applying a dense, hard, adhesive and wear-resistant layer of cermets or ceramic material on a metal object|
|EP0341643A1 *||May 9, 1989||Nov 15, 1989||SEILSTORFER GMBH & CO. METALLURGISCHE VERFAHRENSTECHNIK KG||Corrosion-resistant cold-worked steel and composite containing a matrix of this cold-worked steel and a hard material|
|JPH0288747A *||Title not available|
|JPS5541949A *||Title not available|
|JPS63266038A *||Title not available|
|1||Champagne, "Properties of WC-Co/Steel Composites", R & H M Sep. 1987.|
|2||*||Champagne, Properties of WC Co/Steel Composites , R & H M Sep. 1987.|
|3||*||Ferro Tic: Carbide Performance With Ready Machinability, Div. of Chromalloy.|
|4||Ferro-Tic: Carbide Performance With Ready Machinability, Div. of Chromalloy.|
|5||*||Kennametal, Carbide Components brochure, Wear Systems Division.|
|6||Mal & Tarkan, "Steel Bonded Carbides: Lubricity and Wear Resistance", Sintercast Division, Chromalloy American Corp.|
|7||*||Mal & Tarkan, Steel Bonded Carbides: Lubricity and Wear Resistance , Sintercast Division, Chromalloy American Corp.|
|8||*||Powder Metallurgy International, vol. 16, No. 6, 1984, pp. 267 271.|
|9||Powder Metallurgy International, vol. 16, No. 6, 1984, pp. 267-271.|
|10||Queeney et al., "Elevated Temperature Wear Resistance of Sintered Al2 O3 Reinforced M2 Tool Steel", Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 20, pp. 87-94.|
|11||Queeney et al., "Wear Resistance of WC and VC Reinforced Tool Steel As-Sintered Composites", Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 20, 1988, pp. 77-85.|
|12||*||Queeney et al., Elevated Temperature Wear Resistance of Sintered Al 2 O 3 Reinforced M2 Tool Steel , Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 20, pp. 87 94.|
|13||*||Queeney et al., Wear Resistance of WC and VC Reinforced Tool Steel As Sintered Composites , Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 20, 1988, pp. 77 85.|
|14||Rackoff et al., Rolls For The Metalworking Industries, Chap. 16 "Tungsten Carbide Rolls", pp. 281-306.|
|15||*||Rackoff et al., Rolls For The Metalworking Industries, Chap. 16 Tungsten Carbide Rolls , pp. 281 306.|
|16||Tarkan & Mal, "Steel-Bonded Carbide Improves PM Tooling", Tooling & Production Magazine, Apr. 1974.|
|17||*||Tarkan & Mal, Steel Bonded Carbide Improves PM Tooling , Tooling & Production Magazine, Apr. 1974.|
|18||Wan, "Machinable and Heat Treatable Steel-Bonded Tungsten Carbide", Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 17, 1984, pp. 193-219.|
|19||*||Wan, Machinable and Heat Treatable Steel Bonded Tungsten Carbide , Modern Developments in Powder Metallurgy, vol. 17, 1984, pp. 193 219.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5589268 *||Feb 1, 1995||Dec 31, 1996||Kennametal Inc.||Matrix for a hard composite|
|US5733649 *||Sep 23, 1996||Mar 31, 1998||Kennametal Inc.||Matrix for a hard composite|
|US5733664 *||Dec 18, 1995||Mar 31, 1998||Kennametal Inc.||Matrix for a hard composite|
|US5880382 *||Jul 31, 1997||Mar 9, 1999||Smith International, Inc.||Double cemented carbide composites|
|US6059533 *||May 22, 1998||May 9, 2000||Alliedsignal Inc.||Damped blade having a single coating of vibration-damping material|
|US6220117||Aug 18, 1998||Apr 24, 2001||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Methods of high temperature infiltration of drill bits and infiltrating binder|
|US6227591||Dec 16, 1999||May 8, 2001||Ultraclad Corporation||Dual alloy railroad wheel|
|US6354479 *||Feb 25, 2000||Mar 12, 2002||Sjm Technologies||Dissipative ceramic bonding tip|
|US6454027||Mar 9, 2000||Sep 24, 2002||Smith International, Inc.||Polycrystalline diamond carbide composites|
|US6571889||May 1, 2001||Jun 3, 2003||Smith International, Inc.||Rotary cone bit with functionally-engineered composite inserts|
|US6578622 *||Aug 23, 2001||Jun 17, 2003||Siemens Vdo Automotive Inc.||Core cast manifold assembly|
|US6651864||Dec 31, 2001||Nov 25, 2003||Steven Frederick Reiber||Dissipative ceramic bonding tool tip|
|US6696137 *||Jan 28, 2003||Feb 24, 2004||Smith International, Inc.||Woven and packed composite constructions|
|US6935548||Aug 27, 2003||Aug 30, 2005||Steven-Frederick Reiber||Dissipative ceramic bonding tool tip|
|US7017677||May 14, 2003||Mar 28, 2006||Smith International, Inc.||Coarse carbide substrate cutting elements and method of forming the same|
|US7032802||Sep 15, 2004||Apr 25, 2006||Reiber Steven F||Bonding tool with resistance|
|US7124927||Apr 15, 2005||Oct 24, 2006||Reiber Steven F||Flip chip bonding tool and ball placement capillary|
|US7235211||Jun 3, 2003||Jun 26, 2007||Smith International, Inc.||Rotary cone bit with functionally-engineered composite inserts|
|US7243744||Dec 2, 2003||Jul 17, 2007||Smith International, Inc.||Randomly-oriented composite constructions|
|US7250069||Jun 18, 2003||Jul 31, 2007||Smith International, Inc.||High-strength, high-toughness matrix bit bodies|
|US7389905||Sep 15, 2004||Jun 24, 2008||Reiber Steven F||Flip chip bonding tool tip|
|US7392865||Jul 17, 2007||Jul 1, 2008||Smith International, Inc.||Randomly-oriented composite constructions|
|US7407525||Nov 4, 2003||Aug 5, 2008||Smith International, Inc.||Fracture and wear resistant compounds and down hole cutting tools|
|US7441610||Feb 25, 2005||Oct 28, 2008||Smith International, Inc.||Ultrahard composite constructions|
|US7682557||Dec 15, 2006||Mar 23, 2010||Smith International, Inc.||Multiple processes of high pressures and temperatures for sintered bodies|
|US7757788||Sep 16, 2008||Jul 20, 2010||Smith International, Inc.||Ultrahard composite constructions|
|US7862634||Nov 13, 2007||Jan 4, 2011||Smith International, Inc.||Polycrystalline composites reinforced with elongated nanostructures|
|US8323372 *||Jan 31, 2000||Dec 4, 2012||Smith International, Inc.||Low coefficient of thermal expansion cermet compositions|
|US8349466||Feb 22, 2007||Jan 8, 2013||Kennametal Inc.||Composite materials comprising a hard ceramic phase and a Cu-Ni-Sn alloy|
|US8397841||Jun 26, 2007||Mar 19, 2013||Smith International, Inc.||Drill bit with cutting elements having functionally engineered wear surface|
|US8561731||Sep 24, 2009||Oct 22, 2013||Smith International, Inc.||Hardmetal for use in oil and gas drilling applications|
|US8573330||Aug 6, 2010||Nov 5, 2013||Smith International, Inc.||Highly wear resistant diamond insert with improved transition structure|
|US8579053||Aug 6, 2010||Nov 12, 2013||Smith International, Inc.||Polycrystalline diamond material with high toughness and high wear resistance|
|US8695733||Aug 6, 2010||Apr 15, 2014||Smith International, Inc.||Functionally graded polycrystalline diamond insert|
|US8758463||Aug 6, 2010||Jun 24, 2014||Smith International, Inc.||Method of forming a thermally stable diamond cutting element|
|US8778259||May 25, 2011||Jul 15, 2014||Gerhard B. Beckmann||Self-renewing cutting surface, tool and method for making same using powder metallurgy and densification techniques|
|US8857541||Aug 6, 2010||Oct 14, 2014||Smith International, Inc.||Diamond transition layer construction with improved thickness ratio|
|US8875813||Sep 21, 2007||Nov 4, 2014||Smith International, Inc.||Atomic layer deposition nanocoatings on cutting tool powder materials|
|US8956438||Dec 4, 2012||Feb 17, 2015||Smith International, Inc.||Low coefficient of thermal expansion cermet compositions|
|US9004199||Jun 22, 2010||Apr 14, 2015||Smith International, Inc.||Drill bits and methods of manufacturing such drill bits|
|US20040140133 *||Nov 4, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||Dah-Ben Liang||Fracture and wear resistant compounds and down hole cutting tools|
|US20040142200 *||Sep 2, 2003||Jul 22, 2004||Metso Powdermet Oy||Method for manufacturing erosion-resistant wearing parts and a wearing part|
|US20050109814 *||Sep 15, 2004||May 26, 2005||Reiber Steven F.||Bonding tool with resistance|
|US20050115743 *||Dec 2, 2003||Jun 2, 2005||Anthony Griffo||Randomly-oriented composite constructions|
|US20050242155 *||Apr 15, 2005||Nov 3, 2005||Reiber Steven F||Flip chip bonding tool and ball placement capillary|
|US20050262774 *||Apr 5, 2005||Dec 1, 2005||Eyre Ronald K||Low cobalt carbide polycrystalline diamond compacts, methods for forming the same, and bit bodies incorporating the same|
|DE112009002204T5||Sep 18, 2009||Jul 7, 2011||Smith International, Inc., Tex.||Neuartiges Hartmetall für eine Verwendung bei Erdöl- und Gasbohrungen|
|EP1169926A1 †||Jun 15, 2001||Jan 9, 2002||Hauni Maschinenbau AG||Device for conveying a rod in the tobacco processing industry|
|WO2010149379A1 *||Jun 23, 2010||Dec 29, 2010||Köppern Entwicklungs Gmbh||Wear-resistant insert for a cutting or breaking tool|
|U.S. Classification||419/14, 419/23, 419/18, 419/49|
|International Classification||C22C33/02, C22C29/06, B22F1/00, C22C1/05|
|Cooperative Classification||B22F1/0003, C22C33/0292, C22C1/05, C22C1/051, C22C29/067|
|European Classification||B22F1/00A, C22C33/02F4H, C22C29/06M, C22C1/05B, C22C1/05|
|Feb 19, 1991||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC., 155 RIVER S
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:RUNKLE, JOSEPH C.;REEL/FRAME:005618/0157
Effective date: 19910214
|Oct 30, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NATIONAL FORGE COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:INDUSTRIAL MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. 155 RIVER STREETANDOVER, MASS. 01810;REEL/FRAME:006284/0976
Effective date: 19920206
|Dec 28, 1992||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CIT GROUP/CREDIT FINANCE, INC., THE, NEW YORK
Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NATIONAL FORGE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:006478/0185
Effective date: 19921208
|Sep 11, 1995||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NATIONAL FORGE COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIA
Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:CIT GROUP/CREDIT FINANCE, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:007648/0001
Effective date: 19950627
|Apr 9, 1996||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: RCR GROUP, INC., THE, DELAWARE
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NATIONAL FORGE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:007881/0330
Effective date: 19951011
Owner name: ULTRACLAD CORPORATION, MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RCR GROUP, INC.;REEL/FRAME:007881/0403
Effective date: 19960401
|Oct 7, 1997||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Feb 25, 1998||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Feb 25, 1998||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Sep 25, 2001||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Mar 1, 2002||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Apr 30, 2002||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20020301